Adolphs, R. (2003), ‘Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4.3: 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aitchison, J. (1991), Language Change: Progress or Decay, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alter, R. (1981), The Art of Biblical Narrative, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Andresen, J. (ed.) (2001), Religion in Mind: Cognitive Perspectives on Religious Belief, Ritual and Experience, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, H. (1961), ‘What is authority?’, in Arendt, H., Between Past and Future, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Atran, S. (2002), In Gods We Trust, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Atran, S. and Norenzayan, A. (2004), ‘Religion's evolutionary landscape’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27.6: 713–730.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Co-operation, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W. (1981), ‘The evolution of co-operation’, Science 211: 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayer, A. J. (1936/1990), Language, Truth and Logic, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Baars, B. (1988), A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baars, B. (1997), In the Theatre of Consciousness: the Workspace of the Mind, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, A. (1859), The Emotions and the Will, cited in Scheffler 1986: 58, who refers to Fisch, M. (1954) ‘Alexander Bain and the genealogy of pragmatism’, Journal of the History of Ideas XV and Murphey, M. (1961), pp. 160–161.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995), Mindblindness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Barrett, J. (2000), ‘Exploring the natural foundations of religion’, Trends in Cognitive Science 4.1: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, J. (2004) Why Would Anyone Believe in God?, Pennsylvania: AltaMira Press. Cognitive Science of Religion Series.Google Scholar

Barrett, L., Dunbar, R. and Lycett, J. (eds.) (2002), Human Evolutionary Psychology, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, T. (1993), ‘Two types of naturalism’, Proceedings of the British Academy 80: 171–199.Google Scholar

Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds.) (1992), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barrow, J., Davies, P. and Harper, C. (eds.) (2004), Science and Ultimate Reality, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barth, K. (1933/1968), trans. Hoskyns, E., The Epistle to the Romans, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barton, J. (ed.) (1998), The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, W. (1969/1973) trans. Zorn, H., Charles Baudelaire: A Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism, London: NLB.Google Scholar

Berger, P. (1971), A Rumour of Angels, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Bering, J. (2006), ‘The folk psychology of souls’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29.5: 453–458.Google Scholar

Bering, J. (2008), ‘The end? Why so many of us think our minds continue on after we die’, Scientific American Mind 19.5: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhagavad-Gītā, , trans. R. Zaehner (1973), Oxford University Press.

Bhagavad-Gītā, also trans. B. Miller (1986/2004), New York: Bantam Classic.

Black, M. (1979), ‘More about metaphor’, in Ortony, A. (ed.).

Black, M. (1982), ‘Models and archetypes’, in Black, M., Models and Metaphors, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Blackmore, S. (1999), The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blackmore, S. (2005), Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bockmuehl, M. (2001), ‘Resurrection’, in Bockmuehl, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jesus, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boyer, P. (1993), ‘Cognitive aspects of religious symbolism’, in Boyer, P. (ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Religious Symbolism, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyer, P. (1994), ‘Cognitive constraints on cultural representations: Natural ontologies and religious ideas’, in Hirschfeld and Gelman (eds.) (1994).

Boyer, P. (2000), ‘Evolution of the modern mind and the origins of culture: religious concepts as a limiting case’, in Carruthers, P. and Chamberlain, A. (eds.) (2001) Evolution and the Human Mind, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boyer, P. (2001), Religion Explained, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Brooks, M. (2003), ‘The impossible puzzle’, New Scientist 178. 2389: 34–35.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987), Politeness, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burke, E. (1790/1982), (ed. Cruise O'Brien, C.), Reflections on the Revolution in France, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1985), trans. Raffan, J., Greek Religion, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. (1959), ‘The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language’, in Ayer, A. (ed.), Logical Positivism, Glencoe, ILL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Carse, J. (2008), The Religious Case against Belief, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Carroll, R. and Prickett, S. (eds.) (1997), ‘Introduction’, The Bible: Authorized King James Version, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. (2006), The Architecture of the Mind, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, P. and Smith, P. (eds.) (1996), Theories of Theory of Mind, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, P., Laurence, S. and Stich, S. (eds.) (2005), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carston, R. (1988), ‘Implicature, explicature, and truth theoretic semantics’, in Kempson, R. (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carston, R. (2000), ‘Explicature and semantics’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 2–44. Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London.Google Scholar

Carston, R. (2002), Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication, Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiappe, D. (2000), ‘Metaphor, modularity, and the evolution of conceptual integration’, Metaphor and Symbol 15.3: 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilton, B. (1984), The Kingdom of God in the Teaching of Jesus, London: SPCK.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959), ‘Review of Verbal Behavior by B.S. Skinner’, Language 35: 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1986), Knowledge of Language, New York: Praeger.Google ScholarPubMed

Chomsky, N. (1976), Reflections on Language, London: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2000), New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, M. (2000), The Koran: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (2000), ‘Consider the source: the evolution of adaptations for decoupling and metarepresentations’, in Sperber (ed.) (2000a).

Cosmides, L., Tooby, J. and Barkow, J. (1992), ‘Introduction: evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration’, in Barkow, Cosmides and Tooby (eds.).

Csibra, G. (2003), ‘Teleological and referential understanding in infancy’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B. 35.1431: 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cupitt, D. (1980), Taking Leave of God, London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. (1996), Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, London: Papermac/MacMillan.Google Scholar

Davies, B. (1993), An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1993), ‘Viruses of the mind’, in Dahlblom, B. (ed.), Dennett and His Critics, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (2006), The God Delusion, London: Bantam/Transworld Publishers.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1976), ‘Conditions of personhood’, in Rorty (ed.).

Dennett, D. (1978), Brainstorms, Cambridge MA: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1987), The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: Bradford / MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1995), Darwin's Dangerous Idea, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1996), Kinds of Minds, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (2004), Freedom Evolves, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (2006), Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar

Deutsch, D. (1998), The Fabric of Reality, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

DeWaal, F. (1997), Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

DeWaal, F. (2005), Our Inner Ape, New York: Riverhead/Penguin.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. (2006), Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Dodd, C. (1932/1959), The Epistle of Paul to the Romans, London and Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar

Donner, F. (2006), ‘The historical context’, in McAuliffe (ed.).

Downes, W. (1994), ‘Functional explanations’ in Asher, R. (ed.), The Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Downes, W. (1998), Language and Society, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downes, W. (2000), ‘The language of felt experience’, Language and Literature 9.2: 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downes, W. (2006), ‘Some problems in primatology’, unpublished paper presented at GATI, The Great Ape Trust of Iowa.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1915), trans. Swain, J., The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, New York: Free Press/Macmillan.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (1997), ‘Function and sign: the semiotics of architecture’, in Leach, N. (ed.) Rethinking Architecture, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Eliade, M. (1964), trans. Trask, W., Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Ellis, G. (2004) ‘True complexity and its associated ontology’, in Barrow, Davies and Harper (eds.).

Euripedes, (1973), The Bacchae and other Plays, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Fann, K. (1970), Peirce's Theory of Abduction, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. (1975), The Language of Thought, Hassocks: Harvester.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1981), Representations, Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1983), The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (2001), The Mind Doesn't Work That Way, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar

Frank, R. (1988), Passions within Reason: the Strategic role of the Emotions, New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Gallie, W. (1966), Peirce and Pragmatism, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. (First published in Pelican Philosophy Series, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1952.)Google Scholar

Gardner, D. (2007), Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear, London: Virgin Books.Google Scholar

Gazzaniga, M. (1998), The Mind's Past, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1973), ‘Religion as a cultural system’, in Geertz, C., The Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gethin, R. (1998), The Foundations of Buddhism, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gilliot, C. (2006), ‘Creation of a fixed text’, in McAuliffe (ed.).

Glover, J. (1988), I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1955), ‘On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction’, in Laver, S. and Hutcheson, S. (eds.) (1972) Communication in Face to Face Interaction, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Gould, S and Lewontin, R. (1979), ‘The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme’, Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 2051161: 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, B. (2000), The Elegant Universe, London: Vintage/Random House.Google Scholar

Greene, J. (2005), ‘Cognitive neuroscience and the structure of the moral mind’, in Carruthers, Laurence and Stitch (eds.).

Grice, H. P. (1957), ‘Meaning’, Philosophical Review 66: 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975), ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989), Studies in the Way of Words, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Guthrie, S. (1993), Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guthrie, S. (2001), ‘Why gods? a cognitive theory’, in Andresen (ed.).

Haack, S. (1978), Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (1970), ‘On systematically distorted communication’, Inquiry 13: 205–218. Reprinted in P. Connerton, (ed.) (1976), Critical Sociology, Harmondsworth: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (1984), trans. by McCarthy, T., The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1989), trans. by McCarthy, T., The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Halifax, J. (1979), Shamanic Voices: A Survey of Visionary Narratives, New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. (1978), Language and Social Semiotic, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. (1994), An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Hamburger, M. (1972), The Truth of Poetry, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Hamer, D. (2004), The God Gene, New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Hamilton, S. (2001), Indian Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. (1964), ‘The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1–16; 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harré, R. (1983), Personal Being, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. (2002), ‘The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’, Science 298: 1569–1578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hick, J. (1979), Death and Eternal Life, Glasgow: Collins, Fount Paperbacks.Google Scholar

Hick, J. (1977/2007), Evil and the God of Love, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hirschfeld, L. and Gelman, S. (eds.) (1994), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hölscher, G. (1914), Die Propheten, Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs, cited in Wilson (1988).Google Scholar

Hoobler, T and Hoobler, D. (1993), Confucianism, Oxford and New York: Facts on File Inc./World Religions.Google Scholar

Hooker, R. (1964–1965/1553–1600), Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity. Two Volumes. London: Dent.Google Scholar

Huxley, A. (1946/1974), The Perennial Philosophy, London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (1990), Semantic Structures, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. (1992), Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1960), ‘Closing statement: linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in Language, New York: MIT/Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

James, W. (1896/1956), The Will to Believe and Other essays in Popular Philosophy and Human Immortality, London: Dover/Constable and Co.Google Scholar

James, W. (1902/1958), The Varieties of Religious Experience, New York: Mentor/New American Library.Google Scholar

James, W. (1978), Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jary, M. (1998), ‘Relevance theory and the communication of politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics 30, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987), The Body in the Mind, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. (2005), ‘Reasoning about intentionality in pre-verbal infants’, in Carruthers, Laurence and Stitch (eds.).

Johnson-Laird, P. (1988), The Computer and the Mind, London: Fontana.Google Scholar

,Julian of Norwich (1998), trans. Spearing, E., Revelations of Divine Love, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992), Beyond Modularity: a Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1762/1979), trans. Treash, G., The One Possible Basis for a Demonstration of the Existence of God, (The Beweisgrund), New York: Abaris Books.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1787/1998), trans. Guyer, P. and Wood, A., Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1789/1995), trans. Beck, L., Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What is Enlightenment?, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1793/2000), trans. Guyer, P. and Matthews, E., Critique of the Power of Judgement, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keil, F. (1979), Semantic and Conceptual Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ketner, K., Ransdell, J., Eisele, C., Fisch, M. and Hardwick, C. (eds.) (1981), Proceedings of the C.S. Peirce Bicentennial International Congress, Lubbock TX: Texas Tech Press.Google Scholar

King, R. (1999), Indian Philosophy, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Küng, H. (1977), trans. Quinn, E, On Being a Christian, London: Collins.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1972), Sociolinguistic Patterns, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Ladyman, J. (1998), ‘What is structural realism?’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, the University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Lawson, E. (2001), ‘Psychological perspectives on agency’, in Andresen (ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lennox, J. (2007), God's Undertaker: Has Science Buried God?, London: Lion Hudson.Google Scholar

Poidevin, (1996), Arguing for Atheism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leslie, A. (1987), ‘Pretence and representation: the origins of “Theory of Mind”’, Psychological Review 94: 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leslie, A. (1994) ‘ToMM, ToBY, and agency: core architecture and domain specificity’, in Hirschfeld and Gelman (eds.).

Libet, B. (1990), ‘Conscious subjective experience and unconscious mental functions: a theory of the cerebral processes involved’, in Cotterill, R. (ed.), Models of Brain Function, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Libet, B. (2004), Mind Time: the Temporal Factor in Consciousness, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1977), Semantics, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. (1995), Linguistic Semantics, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, J. (1974), The Cement of the Universe, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. (1982), The Miracle of Theism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Macquarrie, J. (1955/1973), An Existentialist Theology, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Macquarrie, J. (2001), Twentieth Century Religious Thought, 5th edn. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. (1963), ‘Anselm's ontological arguments’, in Malcolm, N., Knowledge and Certainty, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Mandler, G. (1984), Mind and Body, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Mandelbrot, B. and Hudson, R. (2005), The (Mis)Behaviour of Markets, London: Profile Books.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (1981), Cognition and Consciousness, Homewood, ILL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar

McAuliffe, J. (ed.) (2006), The Cambridge Companion to the Qur'ān, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinn, C. (1993), The Problems of Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mead, G. (1934), Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist, Morris, C. (ed.), University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Milner, D. and Goodale, M. (1995), The Visual Brain in Action, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. (1992), Linguistic Variation and Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (1978), ‘Belfast: change and variation in an urban vernacular’, in Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (1985), ‘Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation’, Journal of Linguistics 21: 339–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milroy, L. (1987), Language and Social Networks, 2nd edn. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Milroy, L. and Milroy, J. (1992), ‘Social network and social class: towards an integrated sociolinguistic model’, Language in Society 21: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minsky, M. (1975), ‘A framework for representing knowledge’, in Winston, P. (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Misiak, C. (1991), Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Mithen, S. (1996), The Prehistory of the Mind, London: Phoenix/Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

Murphey, M. (1961), The Development of Peirce's Philosophy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, E. (1979), Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Newberg, A. and D'Aquili, E. (2001), Why God won't Go Away, New York: Ballantine Publishing – Random House.Google Scholar

Newell, W. L. (1981), Struggle and Submission: R.C. Zaehner on Mysticisms, Washington: University of America Press.Google Scholar

Nicols, S. (2005), ‘Innateness and moral psychology’, in Carruthers, Laurence and Stitch (eds.).

Nichols, S. and Stich, S. (2003), Mindreading: an Integrated Account of Pretence, Self-Awareness, and Understanding Other Minds, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nietzsche, F. (1887/1968), trans. Kaufmann, W., Basic Writings of Nietzsche, New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar

O'Hear, A. (1985), What Philosophy Is?, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Ortony, A. (ed.) (1979), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Otto, R. (1950), trans. Harvey, J., The Idea of the Holy, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Otto, R., Oxford Annotated Bible, The, Revised Standard Version (1952/1962), eds. May, H. and Metzger, B., (American Edition), New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parfit, D. (1984), Reasons and Persons, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pilkington, A. (1991), ‘Poetic effects: a relevance theory perspective’, in Sell, R. (ed.), Literary Pragmatics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pilkington, A. (2000), Poetic Effects: A Relevance Theory Perspective, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. (1997), How the Mind Works, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1868/1958), ‘Some consequences of the four incapacities’, Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2:140–157, reprinted in Peirce, C. (1958).Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1871/1958), ‘Critical review of Berkeley's idealism’, North American Review 93: 449–472 reprinted in Peirce, C. (1958).Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1877/1958), ‘The fixation of belief’, Popular Science Monthly 12: 1–15, reprinted in Peirce, C. (1958).Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1878/1958), ‘How to make our ideas clear’, Popular Science Monthly, Jan. 1878: 286–302, reprinted in Peirce, C. (1958).Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1905/1958), ‘What pragmatism is’, The Monist 15: 161–182, reprinted in Peirce, C. (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirce, C. (1905a/1958), ‘Issues of pragmatism’, The Monist 15: 481–499, reprinted in Peirce, C. (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirce, C. (1908/1958), ‘A neglected argument for the existence of God’, Hibbert Journal 7: 90–112. (1908), reprinted in Peirce, C. (1958).Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1953/1958), ‘Excerpts of letters to Lady Welby’, in Lieb, I (ed.), Charles S. Peirce's Letters to Lady Welby, New Haven, CT: Whitlock's Inc., reprinted in Peirce, C. (1958).Google Scholar

Peirce, C. (1958), (ed. Wiener, P.), Values in a Universe of Chance: Selected Writings of C.S. Peirce (1839–1914), Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Original.Google Scholar

Pinch, G. (2004), Egyptian Myth: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plato, (1951), trans. Hamilton, W., The Symposium, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Platts, M. (1997), Ways of Meaning, 2nd edn., Cambridge, MA: Bradford/ MIT Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1957), The Poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Popper, K and Eccles, J. (1977), The Self and its Brain, Berlin/London: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Premack, D. and Woodruff, G. (1978), ‘Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1: 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, H. (1995), Pragmatism: An Open Question, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V. and Blakesee, S. (1998a), Phantoms in the Brain, London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar

Ramachandran, V., Hirstein, W., Armel, K., Tecoma, E. and Iragui, V. (1998b), ‘The neural basis of religious experience’, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 23: 519.1.Google Scholar

Rahman, F. (1979), Islam, 2nd edn., University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Read, S. (1995), Thinking about Logic: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Logic, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recanati, F. (1997), ‘Can we believe what we do not understand?’, Mind and Language 12.1, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recanati, F. (2000), Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press.Google Scholar

Reddy, M. (1979), ‘The conduit metaphor – a case of frame conflict in our language about language’, in Ortony (ed.).

Ricoeur, M. (1969), trans. Buchanan, E., The Symbolism of Evil, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Ridley, M. (1997), The Origins of Virtue, New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Roaf, M. (1990), Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia, Oxford: Facts on File/An Equinox Book.Google Scholar

Robinson, R. and Johnson, W. (1997), The Buddhist Religion: An Historical Introduction, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Rorty, A. (ed.) (1976), The Identities of Persons, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Rosch, (1973), ‘Natural categories’, Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rybczynski, W. (2000), A Good Turn: A Natural History of the Screwdriver and the Screw, New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Sanders, E. (1993), The Historical Figure of Jesus, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Savan, D. (1981), ‘Peirce's semiotic theory of emotion’, in Ketner et al. (eds.).

Saver, J. and Rabin, J. (1997), ‘The neural substrates of religious experience’, Journal of Neuropsychiatry 9.3: 498–510.Google Scholar

Scheffler, I. (1986), Four Pragmatists, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Schillebeeckx, E. (1974/1979), trans. Hoskins, H., Jesus: An Experiment in Christology, London: Collins.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1980), ‘The background of meaning’, in Searle, J., Kiefer, F. and Bierwisch, M. (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sellars, W. (1963), ‘Philosophy and the scientific image of man’, in Sellars, W., Science, Perception and Reality, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Smart, N. (1969/1971), The Religious Experience of Mankind, 13th impression (1983), London: Collins, Fount Paperbacks.Google Scholar

Sober, E. and Wilson, D. (1998), Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behaviour, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1975), trans. Morton, A., Rethinking Symbolism, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1985), ‘Apparently irrational beliefs’, in Sperber, D.On Anthropological Knowledge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1994), ‘The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations’, in Hirschfeld and Gelman (eds.).

Sperber, D. (1996), Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (1997), ‘Intuitive and reflective beliefs’, Mind and Language 12.1, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperber, D. (2000a), (ed.) Metarepresentations: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. (2000b), ‘Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective’, in Sperber (2000a).

Sperber, D. (2000c), ‘An objection to the memetic approach to culture’, in Auger, R. (ed.), Darwinizing Culture, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Hirschfeld, A. (2004), ‘The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity’, Trends in Cognitive Science 8.1. 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995), Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1998), ‘The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon’, in Carruthers, P. and Boucher, J. (eds.), Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (2002), ‘Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading’, Mind and Language 17: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spong, J. (1994), Resurrection: Myth or Reality?, San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar

Steinsaltz, A. (1976), trans Galai, C., The Essential Talmud, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. (1959), Individuals: an Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sripada, C. and Stich, S. (2006), ‘A Framework for the psychology of norms’, in Carruthers, P., Laurence, S. and Stich, S. (eds.), The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1991), The Malaise of Modernity, Toronto: Anansi.Google Scholar

Tegmark, M. (2003), ‘Parallel universes’, Scientific American 288.5: 31–41.Google Scholar

Tegmark, M. (2004), ‘Parallel universes’, in Barrow, Davies and Harper (eds.).

Thrower, J. (1999), Religion: The Classical Theories, Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. (1992), ‘The psychological foundations of culture’, in Barkow, Cosmides and Tooby (eds.).

Trivers, R. (1971), ‘The evolution of reciprocal altruism’, Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, E. (1871/1903), Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art and Custom, 4th edn. 2 Vols., London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Valéry, P. (1961), trans. Folliot, D., The Art of Poetry, New York: Vintage/Random House.Google Scholar

Vermes, G. (2004), The Authentic Gospel of Jesus, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Voloshinov, V. (1973), Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. by Matejka, I. and Titunik, I., New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (1918/1991), ed. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U., Labov, W. and Herzog, M. (1968), ‘Empirical foundations for a theory of language change’, in Lehmann, W. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Williams, R. (2002), Resurrection, London: Darton, Longman and Todd.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2000), ‘Truthfulness and relevance’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics216–254, Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London.Google Scholar

Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2004), ‘Relevance theory’, in Horn, L. and Ward, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell, 607–632. See also UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 249–287. Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London (2002).Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1975), Sociobiology: The New Synthesis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. (1980), Prophecy and Society in Ancient Israel, Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. (1998), ‘The prophetic books’, in Barton (ed.).

Wilson, T. (2002), Strangers to Ourselves, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1979), trans. Paul, D. and Anscombe, G., On Certainty, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Worrall, J. (1989), ‘Structural realism: the best of both worlds?’, Dialectica 43: 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, L. (1976), Teleological Explanations, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Wright, N. (2003), The Resurrection of the Son of Man, (Vol. 3: Christian Origins and the Question of God), London: SPCK.Google Scholar

Zaehner, R. C. (1957), Mysticism: Sacred and Profane, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Zaehner, R. C. (1966), Hinduism, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zimbardo, P. (2008), The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Zimmer, C. (2003), ‘How the mind reads other minds’, Science, 300.5622: 79–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar