Book contents
- Kinship, Law, and Politics
- The Law in Context Series
- International Journal of Law in Context: A Global Forum for Interdisciplinary Legal Studies
- Kinship, Law, and Politics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction: The Anatomy of Belonging
- Part 1 Kinship
- Part 2 Law
- Part 3 Politics
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 June 2020
Book contents
- Kinship, Law, and Politics
- The Law in Context Series
- International Journal of Law in Context: A Global Forum for Interdisciplinary Legal Studies
- Kinship, Law, and Politics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction: The Anatomy of Belonging
- Part 1 Kinship
- Part 2 Law
- Part 3 Politics
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Kinship, Law and PoliticsAn Anatomy of Belonging, pp. 134 - 152Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Adler, Rachel. “The Battered Wife of God: Violence, Law and the Feminist Critique of the Prophets.” Review of Law and Women’s Studies 7, no. 2 (Spring 1998): 171–201.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio. The Coming Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, and Heller-Roazen, Daniel. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Agarwal, Bina. “‘Bargaining’ and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household.” Feminist Economics 3, no. 1 (1997): 1–51.Google Scholar
Eliyyahu Nikomodio, Aharon ben, Sefer Mitsṿot Gadol ha-Niḳra Gan ʻEden Yevpatoria: Saṿsḳan, 1864.Google Scholar
Ahedar, Rex, and Leigh, Ian. Religious Freedom in the Liberal State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ahsan, Niazi I. “The Karaites: Influence of Islamic Law on Jewish Law.” Islamic Studies 32, no. 2 (1993): 137–147.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip S. “The Family of Caesar and the Family of God: The Image of the Emperor in the Heikhalot Literature.” In Images of Empire, edited by Alexander, Loveday, 276–297. Sheffield: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 1991.Google Scholar
Ali, Abdullah Yusuf, trans. The Holy Qur’an : Text, Translation and Commentary. Cairo: Al-Manar, 1934.Google Scholar
Allen, Reginald E. “Participation and Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues.” In Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics, 147–164. New York: Humanities Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Alverio, Efren A. “Other Selves.” Kritike 4, no. 1 (June 2010): 199–218. www.kritike.org/journal/issue_7/alverio_june2010.pdf.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gary A. “The Status of the Torah before Sinai: The Retelling of the Bible in the Damascus Covenant and the Book of Jubilees.” Dead Sea Discoveries 1, no. 1 (1994): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Nancy F. “The ‘Marriage with a Deceased Wife’s Sister Bill’ Controversy: Incest Anxiety and the Defense of Family Purity in Victorian England.” Journal of British Studies 21, no. 2 (1982): 67–86.Google Scholar
Ankori, Zvi. Karaites in Byzantium. Columbia Studies in the Social Sciences 597. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansah, Tawia B. “Reinterpretations of St. Paul’s Concept of Law.” March 5, 2008. https://works.bepress.com/tawia_ansah/1/.Google Scholar
Anselm, . “Cur Deus Homo.” In A Scholastic Miscellany: Anselm to Ockham, edited by Fairweather, Eugene Rathbone, 100–183. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Anthias, Floya. “Belongings in a Globalising and Unequal World: Rethinking Translocations.” In The Situated Politics of Belonging, edited by Yuval-Davis, Nira, Kalpana, Kannabiran, and Vieten, Ulrike, 17–31. London: SAGE, 2006.Google Scholar
Antonsich, Marco. “Searching for Belonging – An Analytical Framework.” Geography Compass 4, no. 6 (2010): 644–659.Google Scholar
Appiah, Kvame A. The Lies That Bind: Rethinking Identity – Creed, Country, Colour, Class, Culture. London: Profile, 2018.Google Scholar
Archibald, Elizabeth. Incest and the Medieval Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . Metaphysics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 2, translated and edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H., ed. Classical Mediterranean Spirituality: Egyptian, Greek, and Roman. New York: Crossroad, 1986.Google Scholar
Aroney, Nicholas. “Subsidiarity, Federalism and the Best Constitution: Thomas Aquinas on City, Province and Empire.” Law and Philosophy 26, no. 2 (2007): 161–228.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahr, Howard M., and Bahr, Kathleen Slaugh. “A Paradigm of Family Transcendence.” Journal of Marriage and Family 58, no. 3 (1996): 541–555.Google Scholar
Bainham, Andrew. “Family Law in a Pluralistic Society.” Journal of Law and Society 22, no. 2 (1995): 234–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bainham, Andrew, Sclater, Shelley Day, and Richards, Martin. What Is a Parent?: A Socio-Legal Analysis. Oxford: Hart, 1999.Google Scholar
Barshack, Lior. “The Holy Family and the Law.” International Journal of Law, Policy and Family 18, no. 2 (August 1, 2004): 214–234.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Katharine T. “Re-expressing Parenthood.” The Yale Law Journal 98, no. 2 (1988): 293–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batnitzky, Leora, Strauss, Leo, and Levinas, Emmanuel. Philosophy and the Politics of Revelation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., and Sommer, Kristin L.. “What Do Men Want? Gender Differences and Two Spheres of Belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson.” Psychological Bulletin 122, no. 1 (1997): 38–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beabout, Gregory R. “The Principle of Subsidiarity and Freedom in the Family, Church, Market, and Government.” Journal of Markets and Morality 1, no. 2 (1998): 130–141.Google Scholar
Ben-Shammai, Haggai. “Between Ananites and Karaites: Observations on Early Medieval Jewish Sectarianism.” In Studies in Muslim–Jewish Relations, vol. 1, edited by Nettler, Ronald L., 19–29. Chur: Harwood Academic (in cooperation with Oxford Centre for Postgraduate Hebrew Studies), 1993.Google Scholar
Ben-Shammai, Haggai. “Sefer Ha-Mitzvoth of the Karaite Levi ben Yefet” (Hebrew). Annual for the Institute of Research in Jewish Law 11–12 (1985): 99–133.Google Scholar
Ben-Shammai, Haggai. “Yeshu‘a Ben Yehuda – The Figure of an 11th-Century Karaite Scholar in Jerusalem” (Hebrew), Pe‘amim 32 (1987): 3–20.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L., Berger, Brigitte, and Kellner, Hansfried. The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. Faith and Order: The Reconciliation of Law and Religion. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.Google Scholar
Berman, Lawrence V. “A Reexamination of Maimonides’ ‘Statement on Political Science.’” Journal of the American Oriental Society 89, no. 1 (1969): 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biale, David. Blood and Belief: The Circulation of a Symbol between Jews and Christians. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Birks, Peter. “The Roman Law Concept of Dominium and the Idea of Absolute Ownership.” Acta Juridica 1 (1985): 1–38.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, book 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Boorstin, Daniel J. The Mysterious Science of the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan R. The Flight to Objectivity: Essays on Cartesianism and Culture. Albany: SUNY Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel. A Radical Jew: Paul and the Politics of Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, Jo, Lind, Craig, and Keating, Heather M.. Responsibility, Law and the Family. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Brill, Alan. Judaism and World Religions: Encountering Christianity, Islam, and Eastern Traditions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buree, Willard L. “The Distinction between the Law and the Gospel: A Sermon by Martin Luther. January 1, 1532.” Concordia Journal, April 1992, 153–163.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Antigone’s Claim: Kinship between Life and Death. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Butler, Melissa A. “Early Liberal Roots of Feminism: John Locke and the Attack on Patriarchy.” The American Political Science Review 72, no. 1 (1978): 135–150.Google Scholar
Butterworth, Charles E. “Philosophy of Law in Medieval Judaism and Islam.” In A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Vol. 6, A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics, edited by Miller, Fred J. Jr. and Biondi, Carrie-Ann, 219–250. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. “On Being Economical with the Truth: Some Liberal Reflections.” Political Studies Review 38, no. 1 (1990): 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. The Ethics of Maimonides. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann. Religion of Reason Out of the Sources of Judaism. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Cohn, Robert L. “Before Israel: The Canaanites as Other in Biblical Traditions.” In The Other in Jewish Thought and History: Constructions of Jewish Culture and Identity, edited by Silberstein, Laurence J. and Cohn, Robert L., 74–91. New York: New York University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Collins, John Joseph, and Harlow, Daniel C.. The “Other” in Second Temple Judaism: Essays in Honor of John J. Collins. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Combs, Mary Beth. “‘A Measure of Legal Independence’: The 1870 Married Women’s Property Act and the Portfolio Allocations of British Wives.” The Journal of Economic History 65, no. 4 (2005): 1028–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conklin, George. “Stephen of Tournai and the Development of Aequitas Canonica: The Theory and Practice of Law after Gratian.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Medieval Canon Law, edited by Chodorow, Stanley, 369–386. Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1992.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Kevin. “Body and Soul in Ancient Religious Experience.” In Armstrong, Classical Mediterranean Spirituality, 360–383.Google Scholar
Crollius, A. Roest. The Word in the Experience of Revelation in Qur’an and Hindu Scriptures. Rome: University Gregoriana, 1974.Google Scholar
Crone, Patricia. “Islam, Judeo-Christianity and Byzantine Iconoclasm.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 2 (1980): 59–95.Google Scholar
Crowley, John. “The Politics of Belonging: Some Theoretical Considerations.” In The Politics of Belonging: Migrants and Minorities in Contemporary Europe, edited by Favell, Adrian and Geddes, Andrew, 15–41. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999.Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard. A Treatise of the Laws of Nature, translated by John Maxwell and edited by Parkin, Jon. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005.Google Scholar
D’Amato, Anthony A. “‘Sources’ and ‘Evidences’ of Law.” In The Concept of Custom in International Law, 264–286. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Daniel, Norman. “The Legal and Political Theory of the Crusade.” In The Impact of the Crusades on Europe, edited by Hazard, Harry W. and Zacour, Norman P., 3–38. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine J., and Stolleis, Michael. Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
David, Joseph E. “‘As It Was Written in the Book of Adam’: Apocalyptic and Mythical Perception of Historical Time in Early Medieval Jewish Thought” (Hebrew). Tarbiẓ 74, no. 4 (2005): 577–602.Google Scholar
David, Joseph E. “Maimonides, Nature, and Law: Refining the Framework.” Journal of Law, Philosophy and Culture 5, no. 1 (2010): 85–100.Google Scholar
David, Joseph E. “‘One Flesh’ in Ecclesiastical Tradition and in Karaite Law.” Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 8, no. 1 (2019): 151–173.Google Scholar
D’Avray, David L. Medieval Marriage: Symbolism and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
DeGirolami, Marc O. The Tragedy of Religious Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Delaney, David. Law and Nature. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delphy, Christine, and Leonard, Diana. Familiar Exploitation: A New Analysis of Marriage in Contemporary Western Societies. Cambridge: Polity, 1992.Google Scholar
Dench, Geoff, and Ogg, Jim. Grandparenting in Britain: A Baseline Study. London: Institute of Community Studies, 2003.Google Scholar
Diamond, James A. “Nahmanides and Rashi on the One Flesh of Conjugal Union: Lovemaking vs. Duty.” Harvard Theological Review 1022 (2009): 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, Jane R., Eshleman, Amy K., Merasco, Dawn M., Shepard, Amy, Wilt, Michael Vander, and Johnson, Melissa, “Parent–Child Relationships and Children’s Images of God.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36, no. 1 (1997): 25–43.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. “The Descent of the Soul in Middle Platonic and Gnostic Theory.” In The Rediscovery of Gnosticism, edited by Layton, Bentley, 357–364. Leiden: Brill, 1980.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert, and Eekelaar, John. “Rethinking Child Protection.” In The State, the Law, and the Family: Critical Perspectives, edited by Freeman, Michael D. A., 93–114. London: Tavistock, 1984.Google Scholar
Dinur, Ben-Zion. ‘‘Arakhim u-Derakhim: Be‘ayot Ḥinnukh ve-Tarbut be-Yisra’el.” Tel Aviv: Urim, 1958.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. “The Idea of a Home: A Kind of Space.” In Home: A Place in the World, edited by Mack, Arien, 287–307. New York: New York University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. “Sacred Contagion.” In Reading Leviticus: A Conversation with Mary Douglas, edited by Sawyer, John F. A., 86–106. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 227. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Duby, Georges. The Knight, the Lady and the Priest: The Making of Modern Marriage in Medieval France, translated by Barbara, Bray. New York: Pantheon, 1983.Google Scholar
Dudley, Leonard. “Language as Platform: A Theory of Subsidiarity and the Nation State.” In Democracy, Freedom and Coercion: A Law and Economics Approach, edited by Marciano, Alain and Josselin, Jean-Michel, 155–170. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007.Google Scholar
Eekelaar, John, and Nhlapo, Ronald Thandabantu. The Changing Family. Oxford: Hart, 1998.Google Scholar
Efros, Israel. “Maimonides’ Arabic Treatise on Logic: Introduction.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 34 (1966): 155–160 (English), 9–42 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Dror. “A Reassessment of Natural Law in Rabbi Joseph Albo’s ‘Book of Principles.’” Hebraic Political Studies 1 (2006): 413–439.Google Scholar
Eichrodt, Walther. Ezekiel: A Commentary., translated by Cosslett Quin. The Old Testament Library. London: SCM, 1970.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1987.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State: In the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan, edited by Leacock, Eleanor Burke and translated by Alec West. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1972.Google Scholar
English, Joseph F. “Married Women and Their Property Rights: A Comparative View.” Catholic University Law Review 10, no. 2 (1961): 75–86.Google Scholar
Erder, Yoram. “Early Karaite Conceptions about Commandments Given before the Revelation of the Torah.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 60 (1994): 101–140.Google Scholar
Erder, Yoram. The Karaite Mourners of Zion and the Qumran Scrolls: On the History of an Alternative to Rabbinic Judaism (Hebrew). Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad, 2004.Google Scholar
Erder, Yoram, and Polliack, Meira. “The Karaite Canon from the Ninth to Eleventh Centuries” (Hebrew). In Canon and Holy Scriptures, edited by Shavit, Yaacov, 165–210. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, 2009.Google Scholar
Estlund, David M., and Nussbaum, Martha Craven, eds. Sex, Preference, and Family: Essays on Law and Nature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, William. “Comparative Jurisprudence (I): What Was It Like to Try a Rat?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143, no. 6 (1995): 1889–2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, William. “Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants.” American Journal of Comparative Law 43, no. 4 (1995): 489–510.Google Scholar
Farnell, David F. “The New Perspective on Paul: Its Basic Tenets, History, and Presuppositions.” Master’s Seminary Journal 16, no. 2 (2005): 189–243.Google Scholar
Federn, Paul. Zur Psychologie der Revolution – Die vaterlose Gesellschaft. Vienna: Anzengruber, 1919.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Eva Dreikurs. “Adler’s Innovative Contributions Regarding the Need to Belong.” Journal of Individual Psychology 66, no. 1 (2010): 1–7.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert. Patriarcha. In Patriarcha and Other Political Works of Sir Robert Filmer, edited by Laslett, Peter, 49–129. Oxford: Blackwell, 1949.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha. The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. New York: New Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, Andreas. “Survey Article: Subsidiarity.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 2 (1998): 190–218.Google Scholar
Fonrobert, Charlotte E. “The Didascalia Apostolorum: A Mishnah for the Disciples of Jesus.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 9, no. 4 (2001): 483–509.Google Scholar
Foster, Theodore B. “‘Mysterium’ and ‘Sacramentum’ in the Vulgate and Old Latin Versions.” American Journal of Theology 19, no. 3 (1915): 402–415.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, vol. 1, translated by Robert Hurley. New York: Random House, 1978.Google Scholar
Fowler, John H. “Outlawing Affineal Incest: Restructuring the Aristocratic Family in the West.” In The Development of Incest Regulations in the Early Middle Ages: Family, Nurturance, and Aggression in the Making of the Medieval West. PhD dissertation, Rice University, 1981.Google Scholar
Frank, Daniel. Search Scripture Well: Karaite Exegetes and the Origins of the Jewish Bible Commentary in the Islamic East. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah. “From Blood to Genes? Rethinking Consanguinity in the Context of Geneticization.” In Christopher H. Johnson et al., Blood and Kinship, 285–306.Google Scholar
Franklin, Sarah, and McKinnon, Susan. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Study. Durham: Duke University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Freedman, H., trans. Genesis. Vols. 1–2 of Midrash Rabbah, edited by Freedman, and Simon, Maurice. London: Soncino, 1961.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles. Modern Liberty and the Limits of Government. New York: W. W. Norton, 2007.Google Scholar
Fujita, Shozo. “The Metaphor of Plant in Jewish Literature of the Intertestamental Period.” Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period 7 (1976): 30–45.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos. “Nachmanides’ Typological Reading of History.” Zion 45, no. 1 (1980): 35–59.Google Scholar
Galston, Miriam. “The Purpose of the Law According to Maimonides.” The Jewish Quarterly Review 69, no. 1 (1978): 27–51.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon J. Gospel of Thomas: Introduction and Commentary. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Gavison, Ruth. “Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction.” Stanford Law Review 45, no. 1 (1992): 1–45.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Gleason, Philip. “Identifying Identity: A Semantic History.” The Journal of American History 69, no. 4 (1983): 910–931.Google Scholar
Goodman, Lenn E. Judaism, Human Rights, and Human Values. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Goshen-Gottstein, Alon. The Sinner and the Amnesiac: The Rabbinic Invention of Elisha Ben Abuya and Eleazar Ben Arach. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Graetz, Heinrich. “Die Mystische Literatur in Der Gaonaeischen Epoche.” Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums 8 (1859): 67–78, 103–118, 140–153.Google Scholar
Grant, Edward. “The Fate of Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy in the Middle Ages: Islam and Western Christianity.” The Review of Metaphysics 61, no. 3 (2008): 503–526.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert M. “The Mystery of Marriage in the Gospel of Philip.” Vigiliae Christianae 15, no. 3 (1961): 129–140.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, W. H. “Filmer’s Patriarchal History.” The Historical Journal 9, no. 2 (1966): 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewe, Wilhelm Georg. The Epochs of International Law, translated by Byers, Michael. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2000.Google Scholar
Grossberg, Lawrence. “Identity and Cultural Studies – Is That All There Is?” In Questions of Cultural Identity, edited by Hall, Stuart and Du Gay, Paul, 87–107. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2012.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Abraham. “The Yeshiva of Eretz-Israel: Its Spiritual Activity and Standing in the Jewish World.” In The History of Jerusalem: The Early Islamic Period (638–1099), edited by Prawer, Joshua, 179–214. Jerusalem: Joint Center of the Hebrew University and Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi, 1987.Google Scholar
Gullette, Margaret Morganroth. “The Puzzling Case of the Deceased Wife’s Sister: Nineteenth-Century England Deals with a Second-Chance Plot.” Representations 31 (1990): 142–166.Google Scholar
Guterman, Simeon L. From Personal to Territorial Law: Aspects of the History and Structure of the Western Legal-Constitutional Tradition. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow, 1972.Google Scholar
Halbertal, Moshe. By Way of Truth: Nahmanides and the Creation of Tradition. Jerusalem: Shalom Hartman Institute, 2006.Google Scholar
Halim, Asyiqin Abdul, Roslan, Mohd Nor, Mohd, Zaki, Ahmad Ibrahim, Berahim, and Ahmad, Faisal Hamid, Faisal. “Ibn Khaldun’s Theory of ‘Asabiyyah and Its Application in Modern Muslim Society.” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 11, no. 9 (2012): 1232–1237.Google Scholar
Hallamish, Moshe, and Ravitzky, Aviezer, eds. The Land of Israel in Medieval Jewish Thought. Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi, 1991.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni uṣūl al-fiqh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Harding, Alan. “Aquinas and the Legislators.” In Théologie et droit dans la science politique de l’État moderne. Actes de la table ronde de Rome (12–14 novembre 1987), 51–61. Publications de l’École française de Rome 147. Rome: École française de Rome, 1991.Google Scholar
Harkavy, Albert. Likute Kadmoniyot: le-korot Dat Bene Miḳra’ veha-literatur shelahem II. Studien und Mittheilungen 8. St. Petersburg, 1903. https://archive.org/details/misifrehamitsvot00hark.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine E. Gentile Impurities and Jewish Identities: Intermarriage and Conversion from the Bible to the Talmud. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hayes, Christine E. What’s Divine about Divine Law? Early Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Letter on Humanism.” In Basic Writings: From Being and Time (1927) to The Task of Thinking (1964), 213–266. New York: Harper and Row, 1977.Google Scholar
Heiser, Michael S. “The Divine Council in Late Canonical and Non-Canonical Second Temple Jewish Literature.” PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 2004.Google Scholar
Héritier, Françoise. Two Sisters and Their Mother: The Anthropology of Incest. New York: Zone Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Hertel, Bradley R., and Donahue, Michael J.. “Parental Influences on God Images among Children: Testing Durkheim’s Metaphoric Parallelism.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34, no. 2 (1995): 186–199.Google Scholar
Hirshman, Marc G. Torah for the Entire World: A Universalist School of Rabbinic Thought. Tel Aviv: ha-Kibuts ha-meuhad, 1999.Google Scholar
Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf, translated and annotated by Murphy, James. London: Angriff, 1981.Google Scholar
Horovitz, Joseph. “Jewish Proper Names and Derivatives in the Koran.” Hebrew Union College Annual 2 (1925): 145–227.Google Scholar
Hughes, Aaron W. “The Golden Age of Muslim Spain: Religious Identity and the Invention of a Tradition in Modern Jewish Studies.” In Historicizing “Tradition” in the Study of Religion, edited by Engler, Steven and Grieve, Gregory P., 51–74. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2005.Google Scholar
Hughes, Aaron W. The Texture of the Divine: Imagination in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Thought. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Hulliung, Mark. “Patriarchalism and Its Early Enemies.” Political Theory 2, no. 4 (1974): 410–419.Google Scholar
Hurtado, Larry W. One God, One Lord: Early Christian Devotion and Ancient Jewish Monotheism. London: T.&T. Clark, 2005.Google Scholar
Huss, Boaz. “The Early Dissemination of Sefer Ha-Zohar.” Tarbiẓ 70, no. 3–4 (2001): 507–542.Google Scholar
Ibn Ezra, Avraham. Yesod Mora ve-Sod Torah (The Foundation of Piety and the Secret of the Torah), edited by Cohen, Joseph. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Khaldun, Ibn. The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History, translated by Franz Rosenthal. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Idel, Moshe. Ben: Sonship and Jewish Mysticism. London: Continuum and Shalom Hartman Institute, 2007.Google Scholar
Idel, Moshe. “On the Land of Israel in Medieval Jewish Mystical Thought.” In Hallamish and Ravitzky, Land of Israel, 193–214.Google Scholar
Izenberg, Gerald. “Identity Becomes an Issue: European Literature in the 1920s.” Modern Intellectual History 5, no. 2 (2008): 279–307.Google Scholar
Jackson, Sherman A. “Legal Pluralism between Islam and the Nation-State: Romantic Medievalism or Pragmatic Modernity?” Fordham International Law Review 30, no. 1 (2006): 158–176.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Andrew S. “‘Papinian Commands One Thing, Our Paul Another’: Roman Christians and Jewish Law in the Collatio Legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum.” In Religion and Law in Classical and Christian Rome, edited by Ando, Clifford and Rüpke, Jörg, 85–99. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2006.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jonathan. “Return to the Sources: Political Hebraism and the Making of Modern Politics.” Hebraic Political Studies 1, no. 3 (2006): 328–342.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Russell. Social Amnesia: A Critique of Conformist Psychology from Adler to Laing. Boston: Beacon, 1975.Google Scholar
Paul, John II. “Centesimus Annus: Encyclical Letter on the Hundredth Anniversary of Rerum Novarum.” May 1, 1991. https://www.catholiclinks.org/encicentesimusannus.htm.Google Scholar
Johnson, Christopher H., Jussen, Bernard, Sabean, David W., and Teuscher, Simon, eds. Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present. New York: Berghahn, 2013.Google Scholar
Joosten, Jan. “A Note on the Text of Deuteronomy XXXII 8.” Vetus Testamentum 57, no. 4 (2007): 548–555.Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. Language and Identity: National, Ethnic, Religious. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar
Julian, III. “Against the Galileans.” In The Works of the Emperor Julian III with an English Translation by Wilmer Cave Wright, Ph.D., 319–428. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Justin, . “Dialogue of Justin, Philosopher and Martyr, with Trypho, a Jew.” In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 1, The Apostolic Fathers, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, edited by Roberts, Alexander, Donaldson, James, and Coxe, A. Cleveland, 519–719. Christian Classics Ethereal Library. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.pdf.Google Scholar
Ḳafiḥ, Yosef, trans. and ed. Beʼur Melekhet ha-Higgayon le-Rabbenu Mosheh Ben Maimon. Tel Aviv: Mekhon Mishnat ha-Rambam, 2010.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, translated by Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson. New York: Harper, 1960.Google Scholar
Kayserling, M. Review of The Jews of Spain: An Inquiry into the Sources of the History of the Jews of Spain, by Jacobs, Joseph. Jewish Quarterly Review 8, no. 3 (1896): 486–499.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. “The Stages of the Decline of the Public/Private Distinction.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 130, no. 6 (1982): 1349–1357.Google Scholar
Khadduri, Majid. War and Peace in the Law of Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. “The Genesis of the Family Tree.” In I Tatti: Studies in the Italian Renaissance 4 (1991): 105–129.Google Scholar
Knust, Jennifer Wright. Abandoned to Lust: Sexual Slander and Ancient Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Koltun-Fromm, Naomi. Hermeneutics of Holiness: Ancient Jewish and Christian Notions of Sexuality and Religious Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Koschorke, Albrecht. The Holy Family and Its Legacy: Religious Imagination from the Gospels to Star Wars. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Kotef, Hagar. “Ba’it (Home/Household).” Mafte’akh: Lexical Review of Political Thought 2 (2010): 1–22.Google Scholar
Kreisel, Howard. “Asceticism in the Thought of R. Bahya Ibn Paquda and Maimonides.” Daat 21 (1988): v–xxii.Google Scholar
Kunin, Seth Daniel. The Logic of Incest: A Structuralist Analysis of Hebrew Mythology. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 185. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. “Rethinking the Family,” review of Justice, Gender, and the Family, by Okin, Susan Moller. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, no. 1 (1991): 77–97.Google Scholar
Ladner, Gerhart B. “Homo Viator: Mediaeval Ideas on Alienation and Order.” Speculum 42, no. 2 (1967): 233–259.Google Scholar
Lafollette, Hugh. “Licensing Parents.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 9, no. 2 (1980): 182–197.Google Scholar
Langermann, Tzvi. “Abraham Ibn Ezra.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Substantive revision October 22, 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ibn-ezra/.Google Scholar
Lara, Maria Mercedes. “Rachel Dolezal Admits She Was ‘Biologically Born White’ but Maintains That She Identifies as Black.” People, November 2, 2015. https://people.com/.Google Scholar
Lasker, Daniel J. “Islamic Influences on Karaite Origins.” In Studies in Islamic and Judaic Traditions, vol. 2, edited by Brinner, William M. and Ricks, Stephen D., 23–47. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Lasker, Daniel J., Citonne, Eli, Ben-Shammai, Haggai, Heller, Joseph Elijah, Nemoy, Leon, and Hofman, Shlomo. “Karaites.” In Encyclopaedia Judaica, edited by Skolnik, Fred and Berenbaum, Michael, 11:785–802. 2nd ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA in association with Keter, 2007.Google Scholar
Avraham, Leṿi ben. Livyat Ḥen: Book Six Part Three: The Work of Creation (Hebrew), edited by Kreisel, Howard T.. Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies, 2004.Google Scholar
Lilla, Mark. The Stillborn God: Religion, Politics, and the Modern West. New York: Vintage Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Locke, John. “The Second Treatise.” In Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration, 100–209. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lorberbaum, Menachem. Politics and the Limits of Law: Secularizing the Political in Medieval Jewish Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Lunn-Rockliffe, Sophie. Ambrosiaster’s Political Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. The Bondage of the Will. In Lull, Basic Theological Writings, 173–226.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. Lectures on Galatians, vol. 26, book 7, of Luther’s Works. St. Louis: Concordia, 1963.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. Martin Luther’s Basic Theological Writings, edited by Lull, Timothy F.. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1989.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. Prefaces to the Old Testament. In Lull, Basic Theological Writings, 118–134.Google Scholar
MacClancy, Jeremy. “The Milk Tie.” Anthropology of Food 2 (September 2003). https://aof.revues.org/339.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. “Democracy, Subsidiarity, and Citizenship in the ‘European Commonwealth.’” Law and Philosophy 16, no. 4 (1997): 331–356.Google Scholar
Mahdi, Muhsin, and Lerner, Ralph, eds. Medieval Political Philosophy: A Sourcebook. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Maier, Christoph T. Crusade Propaganda and Ideology: Model Sermons for the Preaching of the Cross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Maimonides, Moses. Title as Given, translated by A. M. Hershman. Yale Judaica Series. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Makdisi, George. “The Significance of the Sunni Schools of Law in Islamic Religious History.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 10, no. 1 (1979): 1–8.Google Scholar
Malpas, Jeff. Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Malul, Meir. “Adoption of Foundlings in the Bible and Mesopotamian Documents: A Study of Some Legal Metaphors in Ezekiel 16.1–7.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 15, no. 46 (1990): 97–126.Google Scholar
Mansoor, Menahem. “Arabic Sources on Ibn Pakuda’s ‘Duties of the Heart.’” Proceedings of the World Congress of Jewish Studies III, C (1973): 81–90.Google Scholar
Margoliouth, G. “Ibn al-Hītī’s Arabic Chronicle of Karaite Doctors.” Jewish Quarterly Review 9, no. 3 (1897): 429–443.Google Scholar
Martens, John W. One God, One Law: Philo of Alexandria on the Mosaic and Greco-Roman Law. Boston: Brill, 2003.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. Manifesto of the Communist Party, translated from the 1st ed. by Carver, Terrell. In The Cambridge Companion to The Communist Manifesto, edited by Carver, and Farr, James Richard, 235–282. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Maslow, Abraham. “A Theory of Human Motivation.” Psychological Review 50 (1943): 370–396.Google Scholar
Mee, Kathleen, and Wright, Sarah. “Geographies of Belonging.” Environment and Planning A 41, no. 4 (2009): 772–779.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne A. “The Image of the Androgyne: Some Uses of a Symbol in Earliest Christianity.” History of Religions 13, no. 3 (1974): 165–208.Google Scholar
Melamed, Abraham. “Natural, Human, Divine: Classification of the Law among Some 15th and 16th Century Jewish Thinkers.” Italia 4 (1985): 59–93.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. Jerusalem, or On Religious Power and Judaism, translated by Allan Arkush, and introduction and commentary by Alexander Altmann. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1983.Google Scholar
Meulders-Klein, Marie-Thérèse. “Individualisme et Communautarisme: L’individu, la Famille et L’Etat en Europe Occidentale.” Brigham Young University Law Review, 1993, 645–691.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Nature, the Utility of Religion, and Theism. London: Longmans, Green, 1923.Google Scholar
Miller, Linn Maree. “Being and Belonging.” PhD dissertation, University of Tasmania, 2006.Google Scholar
Miller, Patricia Cox. The Corporeal Imagination: Signifying the Holy in Late Ancient Christianity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. “All in the Family and in All Families: Membership, Loving and Owing.” In Estlund and Nussbaum, Sex, Preference, and Family, 249–276.Google Scholar
Mitterauer, Michael. “Christianity and Endogamy.” Continuity and Change 6, no. 3 (1991): 295–333.Google Scholar
Morgan, Derek. “Enigma Variations: Surrogacy, Rights and Procreative Tourism.” In Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives, edited by Cook, Rachel, Day-Sclater, Shelley, and Kaganas, Felicity, 75–92. Oxford: Hart, 2003.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lewis H. Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute, 1871.Google Scholar
Morning, Ann. “Kaleidoscope: Contested Identities and New Forms of Race Membership.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 41, no. 6 (2018): 1055–1073.Google Scholar
Morrow, Virginia. Understanding Families: Children’s Perspectives. London: National Children’s Bureau Enterprises, 1998.Google Scholar
Mueller, Franz H. “The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Christian Tradition.” The American Catholic Sociological Review 4, no. 3 (1943): 144–157.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang P. “The Internal Forum of the Later Middle Ages: A Modern Myth?” Law and History Review 33, no. 4 (2015): 887–913.Google Scholar
Nahmanides, Moses. Commentary on the Torah, edited by Chavel, Charles Ber. 2 vols. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1976.Google Scholar
Nahmanides, Moses. “Drashah for Rosh HaShanah.” In Writings of the Ramban, edited by Chavel, Charles Ber, 211–260. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1986.Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander. “Participation and Predication in Plato’s Later Thought.” Review of Metaphysics 26 (1982): 343–374.Google Scholar
Nemoy, Leon. “Al-Qirqisānī’s Account of the Jewish Sects and Christianity.” Hebrew Union College Annual 7 (1930): 317–397.Google Scholar
Nemoy, Leon. “Two Controversial Points in the Karaite Law of Incest.” Hebrew Union College Annual 49 (1978): 247–265.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Helen J., ed. The Chronicle of the Third Crusade: The Itinerarium Peregrinorum et Gesta Regis Ricardi. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Niederwimmer, Kurt. Askese und Mysterium: Über Ehe, Ehescheidung und Eheverzicht in den Anfängen des Christlichen Glaubens. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 113. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1975.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Dawn Thoughts on the Presumptions of Morality, translated by Smith Brittain. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Noam, Vered. “Divorce in Qumran in Light of Early Halakhah.” Journal of Jewish Studies 56 (2005): 206–223.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. “Preference and Family.” In Estlund and Nussbaum, Sex, Preference, and Family, 319–338.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. The John Robert Seeley Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, and Bales, Robert Freed. Family, Socialization and Interaction Process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955.Google Scholar
Paton, Chalmers I. Marriage with a Deceased Brother’s Wife: Condemned by the Laws of Nature, Scripture, and the Testimony of Churches and Nations. London: James Nisbet, 1869.Google Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. “The Emperor Is Lord of the World: The Bolognese Lawyers and Imperial Ideology.” In The Prince and the Law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition, 8–37. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Philo, . The Allegories of the Laws (Legum Allegoriarum). In Philo, vol. 1, translated and edited by Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
Pines, Shlomo. The Jewish Christians of the Early Centuries of Christianity According to a New Source. Proceedings of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities 2, no. 13. Jerusalem, 1966.Google Scholar
Polliack, Meira. “Medieval Karaite Methods of Translating Biblical Narrative into Arabic.” Vetus Testamentum 48, no. 3 (1998): 375–398.Google Scholar
Powers, David Stephan. Muhammad Is Not the Father of Any of Your Men: The Making of the Last Prophet. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Pusey, E. B. Marriage with a Deceased Wife’s Sister Prohibited by Holy Scripture as Understood by the Church for 1,500 Years: Evidence Given before the Commission Appointed to Inquire into the State and Operation of the Law of Marriage as Relating to the Prohibited Degrees of Affinity. Oxford: John Henry Parker, 1849.Google Scholar
Rapport, Nigel, and Dawson, Andrew. Migrants of Identity: Perceptions of Home in a World of Movement. Oxford: Berg, 1998.Google Scholar
Ravitzky, Aviezer. “‘Waymarks to Zion’: The History of an Idea.” In Hallamish and Ravitzky, Land of Israel, 1–39.Google Scholar
Reinhartz, Adele. “The Meaning of Nomos in Philo’s Exposition of the Law.” Studies in Religion 15 (1986): 337–345.Google Scholar
Renkema, J. “Does Hebrew YTWM Really Mean ‘Fatherless’?” Vetus Testamentum 45, no. 1 (1995): 119–122.Google Scholar
Revel, Bernard. The Karaite Halakah and Its Relations to Sadducean, Samaritan and Philonian Halakah. Philadelphia: Cahan, 1913.Google Scholar
Richardson, Peter, and Westerholm, Stephen, eds. The Debate Over Torah and Nomos in Post-Biblical Judaism and Early Christianity. Studies in Christianity and Judaism 4. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Oneself as Another, translated by Kathleen Blamey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Robinson, James M., ed. “The Exegesis on the Soul.” In The Nag Hammadi Library: The Definitive New Translation of the Gnostic Scriptures, Complete in One Volume, 190–198. San Francisco: Harper Collins, 2000.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. Wheeler. Corporate Personality in Ancient Israel. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1964.Google Scholar
Robinson, William C. Jr. “The Exegesis on the Soul.” Novum Testamentum 12, no. 2 (1970): 102–117.Google Scholar
Rolker, Christof. “Two Models of Incest: Conflict and Confusion in High Medieval Discourse on Kinship and Marriage.” In Law and Marriage in Medieval and Early Modern Times: Proceedings of the Eighth Carlsberg Academy Conference on Medieval Legal History 2011, edited by Andersen, Per, Salonen, Kirsi, Sigh, Helle Moller, and Vogt, Helle, 139–159. Copenhagen: Djøf, 2012.Google Scholar
Rorty, Amélie O. The Identities of Persons. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. “Beyond the Public/Private Division: Law, Power and the Family.” Journal of Law and Society 14, no. 1 (1987): 61–76.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emile, or, On Education, translated by Bloom, Alan. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. In The Social Contract and The First and Second Discourses, edited by Dunn, Susan. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Ruddick, William. “Parents and Life Prospects.” In Having Children: Philosophical and Legal Reflections on Parenthood, edited by O’Neill, Onora and Ruddick, William. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Saba, Sara. “Greek Cities and Families.” In A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds, edited by Rawson, Beryl, 395–407. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar
Sabean, David W., Teuscher, Simon, and Mathieu, Jon, eds. Kinship in Europe: Approaches to Long-Term Developments (1300–1900). New York: Berghahn, 2007.Google Scholar
Saller, Richard P. Patriarchy, Property, and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Sampley, J. Paul. “And the Two Shall Become One Flesh: A Study of Traditions in Ephesians 5:21–33.” Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J., ed. Introduction to Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: New York University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. “Imagining the Law of the Father: Loss, Dread, and Mourning in The Sweet Hereafter.” Law and Society Review 34, no. 1 (2000): 3–46.Google Scholar
Sasson, Ilana. “Gender Equality in Yefet Ben ʿElī’s Commentary and Karaite Halakhah.” AJS Review 37, no. 1 (2013): 51–74.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Peter. The Origins of Jewish Mysticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Heinz Rudolph. Making Decisions about Children: Psychological Questions and Answers. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Schein, Sylvia. Gateway to the Heavenly City: Crusader Jerusalem and the Catholic West (1099–1187). Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar
Schneider, David M. “What Is Kinship All About?” In Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year, edited by Reining, Priscilla, 32–63. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, 1972.Google Scholar
Schoeps, Hans Joachim. Paul: The Theology of the Apostle in the Light of Jewish Religious History. London: Lutterworth, 1961.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Moses. Sefer Ḥatam Sofer, Ḥeleḳ Oraḥ Ḥayyim … Teshuvot She’elot. Bratislava: Grossman, 1841.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Frederick M. “The Self in Ancient Religious Experience.” In Armstrong, Classical Mediterranean Spirituality, 337–359.Google Scholar
Schwarb, Gregor. “Capturing the Meanings of God’s Speech: The Relevance of uṣūl al-fiqh to an Understanding of uṣūl al-tafsīr in Jewish and Muslim kalam.” In A Word Fitly Spoken: Studies in Medieval Exegesis of the Hebrew Bible and the Qurʾān Presented to Haggai Ben-Shammai, edited by Bar-Asher, Meir M., Hopkins, Simon, Stroumsa, Sarah, and Chiesa, Bruno, 111–156. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi Institute, 2007.Google Scholar
Schwarb, Gregor. “Yūsuf al-Baṣīr.” In Encyclopedia of Jews in the Islamic World, edited by Stillman, Norman A.. Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Schweigert, Francis J. “Solidarity and Subsidiarity: Complementary Principles of Community Development.” Journal of Social Philosophy 33, no. 1 (2002): 33–44.Google Scholar
Scott, James M. Adoption as Sons of God: An Exegetical Investigation into the Background of [Huiothesia] in the Pauline Corpus. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1992.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. “Gender and Cooperative Conflicts.” In Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development, edited by Tinker, Irene, 123–149. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Shell, Marc. “Tribal Brotherhood and Universal Otherhood.” In Children of the Earth: Literature, Politics, and Nationhood, 176–192. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Shell, Marc. “The Want of Incest in the Human Family: Or, Kin and Kind in Christian Thought.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 62, no. 3 (1994): 625–650.Google Scholar
Shemesh, Aharon, “The Laws of Incest in the Dead Sea Scrolls and the History of Halakhah.” In Halakhah in Light of Epigraphy, edited by Baumgarten, Albert I., Eshel, Hanan, Katzoff, Ranon, and Tzoref, Shani, 81–102. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 2010.Google Scholar
Shepardson, Christine. Anti-Judaism and Christian Orthodoxy: Ephrem’s Hymns in Fourth-Century Syria. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Shivanandan, Mary. Crossing the Threshold of Love: A New Vision of Marriage in the Light of John Paul II’s Anthropology. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Shur, Nathan. The History of the Karaites (Hebrew). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, 2003.Google Scholar
Sklare, David. “Are the Gentiles Obligated to Observe the Torah? The Discussion Concerning the Universality of the Torah in the East in the Tenth and Eleventh Centuries.” In Be’erot Yitzhak: Studies in Memory of Isadore Twersky, edited by Harris, Jay M., 311–346. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Sklare, David E. “Yūsuf al-Baṣīr: Theological Aspects of His Halakhic Works.” In The Jews of Medieval Islam: Community, Society, and Identity, edited by Frank, D., 249–270. Leiden: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar
Slater, Philip E. The Glory of Hera: Greek Mythology and the Greek Family. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol, Neale, Bren, and Wade, Amanda. The Changing Experience of Childhood: Families and Divorce. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar
Smith, , Jonathan, Z. “A Matter of Class: Taxonomies of Religion.” The Harvard Theological Review 89, no. 4 (1996): 387–403.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan Z. “What a Difference a Difference Makes.” In To See Ourselves as Others See Us: Christians, Jews, ‘Others’ in Late Antiquity, edited by Jacob, Neusner and Frerichs, Ernset S., 3–48. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Smith, Karl. “From Dividual and Individual Selves to Porous Subjects.” Australian Journal of Anthropology 23 (2012): 50–64.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark S. The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven D. The Rise and Decline of American Religious Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P. “From Suarez to Filmer: A Reappraisal.” The Historical Journal 25, no. 3 (1982): 525–540.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de. Theological-Political Treatise, edited by Israel, Jonathan, translated by Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Steinschneider, Moses. Catalogus Codicum Hebræorum Bibliothecæ Academiæ Lugduno-Batavæ. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1858.Google Scholar
Stephen, . Preface to the Summa of Stephen of Tournai on Gratian’s Decretum. In Prefaces to Canon Law Books in Latin Christianity: Selected Translations, 500–1245, commentary and translations by Robert Somerville and Bruce C. Brasington, 194–201. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Stern, Josef. Problems and Parables of Law. New York: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. Spinoza’s Critique of Religion, translated by E. M. Sinclair. New York: Schocken, 1965.Google Scholar
Suber, Peter. “Paternalism.” In Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia, edited by Gray, Christopher B., 632–635. New York: Garland, 1999.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Winnifred F., Hurd, Elizabeth S., Mahmood, Saba, and Danchin, Peter G., eds. Politics of Religious Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Summerell, Orrin F. The Otherness of God. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1998.Google Scholar
Syrpis, Phil. “In Defence of Subsidiarity.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24, no. 2 (2004): 323–334.Google Scholar
Taubes, Jacob. The Political Theology of Paul, translated by Dana Hollander. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Teuscher, Simon. “Flesh and Blood in the Treatises on the Arbor Consanguinitatis.” In Johnson, Christopher H. et al., Blood and Kinship, 83–104.Google Scholar
Thomas, Laurence. The Family and the Political Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Thomas, . The Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas, translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province and revised by Sullivan, Daniel J.. Chicago: William Benton, 1952.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. “Origins of Jurisdiction: Hierarchy and Consent, 1250–1350.” In Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought, 1150–1650, 29–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. “‘The Prince Is Not Bound by the Laws’: Accursius and the Origins of the Modern State.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 5, no. 4 (1963): 378–400.Google Scholar
Triglot Concordia: The Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1921.Google Scholar
Ullmann, Walter. “The Development of the Medieval Idea of Sovereignty.” English Historical Review 64, no. 250 (1949): 1–33.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna. “Family Fairness.” Social Research 73, no. 2 (Summer 2006): 575–596.Google Scholar
Van Ginneken, Jaap. “The Killing of the Father: The Background of Freud’s Group Psychology.” Political Psychology 5, no. 3 (1984): 391–414.Google Scholar
Van Slyke, D. G. “The Changing Meanings of sacramentum: Historical Sketches.” Antiphon 11, no. 3 (2007): 245–279.Google Scholar
Vergote, Antoine, Tamayo, Alvaro, Pasquali, Luiz, Bonami, Michel, Pattyn, Marie-Rose, and Custers, Anne. “Concept of God and Parental Images.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 8, no. 1 (1969): 79–87.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. The New Science, translated by Thomas Goddard Bergin and Max Harold Fisch. Place: Cornell University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Von Hayek, Friedrich A. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Vööbus, Arthur, trans. The Synodicon in the West Syrian Tradition, vol. 1. Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium. Louvain: Secrétariat du Corpus SCO, 1975.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. “Liberalism and the Art of Separation.” Political Theory 12, no. 3 (1984): 315–330.Google Scholar
Waters, Brent. “Welcoming Children into Our Homes: A Theological Reflection on Adoption.” Scottish Journal of Theology 55, no. 4 (2002): 424–437.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jeffrey. “The Value of Difference.” In Identity, Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Rutherford, Jonathan, 88–100. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1990.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Jeff Alan, and Kumar, Krishan. Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Westerholm, Stephen. Perspectives Old and New on Paul: The “Lutheran” Paul and His Critics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
White, Stephen D. Re-thinking Kinship and Feudalism in Early Medieval Europe. Burlington: Aldershot, 2005.Google Scholar
White House Working Group on the Family. The Family: Preserving America’s Future – A Report to the President from the White House Working Group on the Family. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, 1986.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “The Neo-romantic Turn.” In Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, edited by Legrand, P. and Munday, R., 312–344. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Widener, Michael, and Weiner, Mark S.. Law’s Picture Books: The Yale Law Library Collection. New Jersey: Talbot, 2017.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Glasgow: Croom Helm, 1976.Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan. “Civil and Religious Law in England: A Religious Perspective.” Ecclesiastical Law Journal 10, no. 3 (2008): 262–282.Google Scholar
Winer, Rebecca Lynn. “Family, Community, and Motherhood: Caring for Fatherless Children in the Jewish Community of Thirteenth-Century Perpignan.” Jewish History 16, no. 1 (2002): 15–48.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr. Law and Protestantism: The Legal Teachings of the Lutheran Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr. “Why Two in One Flesh? The Western Case for Monogamy over Polygamy.” Emory Law Journal 64, no. 6 (2015): 1675–1746.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed., translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. New York: MacMillan, 1958.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, Barbara Bennett. “Children’s Rights: The Destruction and Promise of Family.” Brigham Young University Law Review, 1993, 497–515.Google Scholar
Worby, Sam. Law and Kinship in Thirteenth-Century England. Woodbridge: Royal Historical Society, 2010.Google Scholar
al-Qirqisani, Ya‘qub. Kitab al-Anwar w al-Maraqib, edited by Nemoy, Leon. New York: Alexander Kuhut Memorial Foundation, 1939.Google Scholar
Yaron, Reuven. “Duabus sororibus coniunctio.” Revue Internationale de Droits de l’Antiquité 10 (1963): 115–136.Google Scholar
Yazaki, Saeko. Islamic Mysticism and Abū Ṭālib Al-Makkī: The Role of the Heart. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Yelle, Robert. “Moses’ Veil: Secularization as Christian Myth.” In After Secular Law, edited by Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers, Yelle, Robert A., and Taussig-Rubbo, Mateo, 23–42. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Yehudah, Yeshu‘ah ben. Sefer ha-ʻArayot ha-Mekhunneh Sefer ha-Yashar, translated by Ya‘aḳov ben Shim‘on, edited by Markon, Isaak. St. Petersburg: Defus Yosef Lurya, 1908.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. “Belonging and the Politics of Belonging.” Patterns of Prejudice 40, no. 3 (2006): 197–214.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Solomon. “Judaism as a Religion: An Historical Study [Continued from JQR, N. S. XXXV (1944) 85–116],” The Jewish Quarterly Review, n.s., 35, no. 2 (1944): 179–225.Google Scholar
Ziskind, J. R. “The Missing Daughter in Leviticus XVII.” Vetus Testamentum 46, no. 1 (1996): 125–130.Google Scholar