Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mm7gn Total loading time: 0.896 Render date: 2022-08-17T05:29:23.050Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2019

Eric Watkins
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant on Laws , pp. 284 - 292
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert M., “Moral Faith,” The Journal of Philosophy 92 (1995): 7595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Robert M., “God, Possibility, and Kant,” Faith and Philosophy 4 (2000): 425–40.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry, “Kant’s Antinomy of Teleological Judgment,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (Supplement) (1991): 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry, Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Kant’s Theory of Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “The Critique of Metaphysics: Kant and Traditional Ontology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, Paul (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 249–79.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, Interpreting Kant’s Critiques (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “The End of the Critiques: Kant’s Moral ‘Creationism,’” in Rethinking Kant, ed. Muchnik, Pablo (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009), pp. 165–90.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “Kant’s Ambivalent Cosmopolitanism,” in Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht, ed. La Rocca, Claudio, Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, and Ruffing, Margit, vol. 1 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 5572.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “Vindicating Autonomy,” in Kant on Moral Autonomy, ed. Sensen, Oliver (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 5370.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl, “On the Many Senses of ‘Self-Determination,’” in Freedom and Spontaneity in Kant, ed. Moran, Kate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 171–94.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, What Is a Law of Nature? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano, “Legge e obbligatorietà: la struttura dell’idea di autolegislazione morale,” Studi kantiani 26 (2013): 5570.Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano, and Sensen, Oliver (eds.), The Emergence of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Baumeister, Friedrich, Institutiones Metaphysicae, [Wittenberg], reprinted in Abt. 3, Bd. 25 of Christian Wolff, Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlag, [1738] 1988).Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White, Selected Essays on Kant, ed. Robinson, Hoke (Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen, “The Nongoverning Conception of Laws of Nature,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2000): 571–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeson, David, Maupertuis: An Intellectual Biography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bilfinger, Georg Bernhard, Dilucidationes philosophicae de Deo, anima humana, mundo, et generalibus rerum affectionibus, [Tübingen], reprinted in Abt. 3, Bd. 18 of Christian Wolff, Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlag, [1725] 1982).Google Scholar
Breitenbach, Angela, Die Analogie von Vernunft und Natur. Eine Umweltphilosophie nach Kant (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittan, Gordan, Kant’s Theory of Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Brook, Andrew, Kant and the Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969).Google Scholar
Buchdahl, Gerd, “Gravity and Intelligibility: From Newton to Kant,” in The Methodological Heritage of Newton, ed. Butts, Robert and Davis, John (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1970), pp. 74102.Google Scholar
Butts, Robert, “The Methodological Structure of Kant’s Metaphysics of Science,” in Kant’s Philosophy of Physical Science, ed. Butts, Robert (Reidel: Dordrecht, 1986), pp. 163–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calinger, Ronald S., “Frederick the Great and the Berlin Academy of Sciences (1740–1766),” Annals of Science 24 (1968): 239–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calinger, Ronald S., “The Newtonian-Wolffian Confrontation in the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences,” Cahiers d’histoire mondiale 11 (1968): 417–35.Google Scholar
Calinger, Ronald S., “The Newtonian-Wolffian Controversy (1741–1759),” Journal of the History of Ideas 30 (1969): 319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolph, “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 11 (1950): 2043.Google Scholar
Carrier, Martin, “Kant’s Relational Theory of Absolute Space,” Kant-Studien 83 (1992): 399416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy, How the Laws of Physics Lie (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy, Nature’s Capacities and Its Measurement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy, The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, Kants Leben und Lehre (Berlin: B. Cassirer, 1921).Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst, Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit (Berlin: B. Cassirer, 1922).Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew, “Belief in Kant,” The Philosophical Review 116 (2007): 323–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew, “Kant’s Concepts of Justification,” Nous 41 (2007): 3363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew, “Kant, Modality, and the Most Real Being,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (2009): 157–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William, “German Physics Textbooks in the Goethezeit, Parts 1 and 2,” History of Science 35 (1997): 219–39 and 295–363.Google Scholar
Cohen, Alix, “Kant’s Antinomy of Reflective Judgment: A Re-Evaluation,” Teorema 23 (2004): 183–97.Google Scholar
Cramer, Konrad, Nicht-reine synthetische Urteile a priori. Ein Problem der Transzendentalphilosophie Immanuel Kants (Heidelberg: Carl Winter Verlag, 1985).Google Scholar
Crusius, Christian, August, Entwurf der nothwendigen Vernunft-Wahrheiten (Leipzig: Gleditsch, 1745).Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Daniel O., “Kant’s Metaphysics of Nature,” in Nature and Scientific Method, ed. Dahlstrom, Daniel O. (Washington: Catholic University Press of America, 1991) pp. 271–90.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert, and Kelly, Sean Dorrance, All Things Shining: Reading the Western Classics to Find Meaning in a Secular Age (New York: Free Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Erxleben, Johann Christian Polykarp, Anfangsgründe der Naturlehre (Göttingen, 1772 [1st edition], 1787 [4th edition]).Google Scholar
Ewing, Alfred C., Kant’s Treatment of Causality (London: Kegan Paul, 1923).Google Scholar
Fischer, Mark, “Organisms and Teleology in Kant’s Natural Philosophy,” PhD dissertation, Emory University, 2007.
Förster, Eckart, “Is There ‘a Gap’ in Kant’s Critical System?,” Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (1987): 533–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Eckart, “How Are Transcendental Arguments Possible?,” in Reading Kant, ed. Schaper, Eva and Vossenkuhl, Wilhelm (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1989), pp. 320.Google Scholar
Förster, Eckart, “Von der Eigentümlichkeit unseres Verstands in Ansehung der Urteilskraft (§§ 74–78),” in Kooperativer Kommentar zu Kants Kritik der Urteilskraft, ed. Höffe, Otfried and Goy, Ina (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2008), pp. 259–74.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael, “Causal Laws and the Foundations of Natural Science,” in The Cambridge Companion to Kant, ed. Guyer, Paul (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 161–99.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael, Kant and the Exact Sciences (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael, Kant’s Construction of Nature: A Reading of the Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah, “Kant on Understanding Organisms as Natural Purposes,” in Kant and the Sciences, ed. Watkins, Eric (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 231–58.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah, “Two Kinds of Mechanical Inexplicability,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004): 3365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah, “Kant’s Biological Teleology and Its Philosophical Significance,” in The Normativity in Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 316–31.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah, The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Goy, Ina, “On Judging Nature as a System of Ends. Exegetical Problems of §67 of the Critique of the Power of Judgment,” in Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, Pisa 2010, ed. LaRocca, Claudio, Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, and Ruffing, Margit, vol. 5 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013), pp. 6576.Google Scholar
Grier, Michelle, Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant and the Claims of Knowledge (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul, “Freedom, Happiness, and Nature: Kant’s Moral Teleology,” in Kant’s Philosophy of Biology, ed. Goy, Ina and Watkins, Eric (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2014), pp. 221–37.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud, “German Natural Law,” in Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, ed. Goldie, Mark and Wokler, Robert (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 249–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, “Eighteenth Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis-Viva Controversy,” Isis 56 (1965): 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, “The Influence of Malebranche on the Science of Mechanics during the 18th Century,” Journal of the History of Ideas 28 (1967): 193210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, “The Reception of Newton’s Second Law of Motion in the 18th Century,” Archives internationales d’histoire des sciences 20 (1967): 4365.Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, “The Concept of Hard Bodies in the History of Physics,” History of Science 9 (1970): 119–28.Google Scholar
Hankins, Thomas, Jean d’Alembert: Science and the Enlightenment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Harnack, Adolf, Geschichte der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Berlin: Reichsdruckerei, 1900).Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter, “Voluntarism and Early Modern Science,” History of Science 40 (2002): 6389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartung, Gerald, Die Naturrechtsdebatte: Geschichte der Obligatio vom 17. bis 20. Jarhhundert (Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber, 1998).Google Scholar
Henry, John, “Metaphysics and the Origins of Modern Science: Descartes and the Importance of Laws of Nature,” Early Science and Medicine 9 (2004): 73114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstrasser, Tim, Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, Hansgeorg, Kants Theorie der Physik. Eine Untersuchung über das Opus postumum von Kant (Frankfurt: Klostermann, 1969).Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian, Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn M., “D’Alembert and the Vis Viva Controversy,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 1 (1970): 135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn M., “Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy,” Isis 62 (1971): 2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn M., “The Leibnizean-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology,” British Journal for the History of Science 6 (1972): 341–77.Google Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn M., “The Decline of Cartesian Mechanics: The Leibnizian-Cartesian Debates,” Isis 64 (1973): 356–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, Carolyn, “Madame du Chatelet’s Metaphysics and Mechanics,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 8 (1977): 2948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Terence, The Development of Ethics, vol. 2 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan, The Enlightenment Contested (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankowiak, Tim, “Kant on the Continuity of Alteration” (unpublished manuscript).
Kain, Patrick, “Self-Legislation in Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 86 (2004): 257306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, Patrick, “Interpreting Kant’s Theory of Divine Commands,” Kantian Review 9 (2005): 128–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Pluhar, W. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Vorlesung zur Moralphilosophie, ed. Stark, Werner (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004).Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip, “Kant’s Philosophy of Science,” in Contemporary Perspectives on the History of Philosophy, ed. French, Peter A., Uehling, Theodore E. Jr., and Wettstein, Howard K., vol. 8 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983), pp. 387408.Google Scholar
Kleinert, Andreas, “Mathematik und anorganische Naturwissenschaften,” in Wissenschaften im Zeitalter der Aufklärung, ed. Vierhaus, Rudolf (Göttingen: Vandenhoek and Ruprecht, 1985), pp. 218–48.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline, “The Conative Character of Reason in Kant’s Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (1998): 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudan, Larry, “The Vis Viva Controversy: A Post-Mortem,” Isis 59 (1968): 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Philosophical Essays, ed. and trans. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1989).Google Scholar
Lind, Gunter, Physik im Lehrbuch 1700–1850 (Springer: Berlin, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1689).Google Scholar
Locke, John, Essays on the Laws of Nature, ed. von Leyden, Wolfgang (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice, Kant and the Capacity to Judge (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de, Recherche des loix du mouvement (Berlin, 1746).Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de, Examen philosophique de la preuve de l’Existence de Dieu employee dans l’Essai de Cosmologie (Berlin, 1758).Google Scholar
Maupertuis, Pierre Louis Moreau de, Discours sur les différentes Figures des Astres, Paris, [1732], reprinted in Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis, Oeuvres (Lyon, 1768).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Peter, Kant’s Critique of Teleology in Biological Explanation: Antinomy and Teleology (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 1990).Google Scholar
McMullin, Ernan, Newton on Matter and Activity (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Milton, John R., “The Origin and Development of the Concept of the Laws of Nature,” Archives Européennes de Sociologie 22 (1981): 173–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musschenbroek, Pieter van, Grundlehren der Naturwissenschaft, nach der zweiten lateinischen Ausgabe, trans. Gottsched, Johann Christoph (Leipzig, 1747).Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World, trans. Mott, Andrew, revised by Cajori, Florian (Berkeley: University of California Press, [1729] 1934).Google Scholar
Oakley, Francis, “Christian Theology and the Newtonian Science: The Rise of the Concept of the Laws of Nature,” Church History 30 (1961): 433–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora, Constructions of Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Palter, Robert, “Kant’s Formulation of the Laws of Motion,” Synthese 24 (1972): 96116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David, “The Vis Viva Controversy,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 8 (1977): 111–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Stuart, “Two Mathematics, Two Gods: Newton and the Second Law,” Perspectives on Science 2 (1994): 231–53.Google Scholar
Plaass, Peter, Kants Theorie der Naturwissenschaft. Eine Untersuchung zur Vorrede von Kants “Metaphysischen Anfangsgründen der Naturwissenschaft” (Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1965).Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, “Kant’s Objection to the Ontological Argument,” The Journal of Philosophy 63 (1966): 537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollok, Konstantin, Kant’s Theory of Normativity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulte, Helmut, Das Prinzip der kleinsten Wirkung und die Kraftkonzeption der rationalen Mechanik (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1989).Google Scholar
Quarfood, Marcel, Transcendental Idealism and the Organism (Stockholm: Almquiest and Wiksell, 2004).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” The Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980): 515–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews, “Legislating the Moral Law,” Nous 28 (1994): 435–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews, Agency and Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reusch, Johann Peter, Systema metaphysicum antiquiorum atque recentiorum item propria dogmata et hypotheses exhibens, [Jena], reprinted in Abt. 3, Bd. 27 of Christian Wolff, Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlag, [1735] 1990).Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur, Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruby, Jane E., “The Origins of Scientific ‘Law,’Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome, “Kant and Natural Law Ethics,” Ethics 104 (1993): 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome, The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönfeld, Martin, The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Pre-Critical Project (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
s’Gravesande, Willem Jacob van, Mathematical Elements of Natural Philosophy Confirmed by Experiments or an Introduction to Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy, 2nd edition, trans. Desaguliers, John Theophilus (London, 1721).Google Scholar
Smith, Norman Kemp, A Commentary to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (New York: Humanities Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Kant’s Early Theory of Motion,” The Leibniz Review 19 (2009): 2960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Rebellious Wolffian: Kant’s Philosophy of Mechanics in 1758,” in Rethinking Kant, ed. Thorndike, Oliver, Vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2011), pp. 158–79.Google Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Newton and Wolff: The Leibnizian Reaction to the Principia, 1716–1763,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (2012): 459–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Kant’s Third Law of Mechanics: The Long Shadow of Leibniz,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (2013): 493504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Kant and the Object of Determinate Experience,” Philosopher’s Imprint 15 (2015): 119.Google Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Euler, Newton, and Foundations for Mechanics,” in The Oxford Handbook of Newton, ed. Smeenk, Chris and Schliesser, Eric (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 122.Google Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Newton’s Concepts of Force among the Leibnizians,” in Reading Newton in Early Modern Europe, ed. Feingold, Mordechai and Boran, Elizabethanne (Leiden: Brill, 2017), pp. 244–89.Google Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Emilie du Chatelet’s Metaphysics of Substance,” The Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (2018): 477–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stan, Marius, “Rationalist Foundations and the Science of Force,” in The Oxford Handbook of 18th Century German Philosophy, ed. Brandon Look and Frederick Beiser (New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).
Steinle, Friedrich, “The Amalgamation of a Concept – Laws of Nature in the New Sciences,” in Laws of Nature: Essays on the Philosophical, Scientific and Historical Dimensions, ed. Weinert, Friedel (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995), pp. 316–68.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter, The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (London: Methuen, 1966).Google Scholar
Suarez, Francisco, On Laws and God the Lawgiver, 8 vols., ed. and trans. Perena, L. et al. (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 1971–81).Google Scholar
Sutherland, Daniel, “The Point of Kant’s Axioms of Intuition,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2005): 135–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Terrall, Mary, “Maupertuis and Eighteenth-Century Scientific Culture,” PhD thesis, UCLA, 1987.
Thümmig, Ludwig Philipp, Institutiones philosophiae Wolfianae, [Frankfurt], reprinted in Abt. 3, Bd. 19 of Christian Wolff, Gesammelte Werke, (Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlag, [1725–6] 1982).Google Scholar
Tolley, Clinton, “Kant and the Nature of Logical Laws,” Philosophical Topics 34 (2006): 371407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooley, Michael, “The Nature of Laws,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (1977): 667–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard, The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Velkley, Richard, Freedom and the End of Reason: On the Moral Foundation of Kant’s Critical Philosophy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Ralph C., “The Status of Kant’s Theory of Matter,” in Kant’s Theory of Knowledge, ed. Beck, Lewis White (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1974), pp. 151–6.Google Scholar
Washburn, Michael, “Did Kant Have a Theory of Self-Knowledge?,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 58 (1976): 4056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “The Development of Physical Influx in Early Eighteenth-Century Germany: Gottsched, Knutzen, and Crusius,” Review of Metaphysics 49 (1995): 295339.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “Kant’s Theory of Physical Influx,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 77 (1995): 285324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “On the Necessity and Nature of Simples: Leibniz, Wolff, Baumgarten, and the Pre-Critical Kant,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 3 (2006): 261314.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “Kant and the Myth of the Given,” Inquiry 51 (2008): 512–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “Kant on the Hiddenness of God,” Kantian Review 14 (2009): 81122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “The Antinomy of Practical Reason: Reason, the Unconditioned, and the Highest Good,” in Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, ed. Reath, Andrews and Timmerman, Jens (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 145–67.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “Making Sense of Mutual Interaction: Simultaneity and the Equality of Action and Reaction,” in Kant and the Concept of Community, ed. Payne, Charlton and Thorpe, Lucas (Rochester: Rochester University Press, 2011), pp. 4162.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “The Early Kant’s (Anti-)Newtonianism,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44 (2012): 429–37.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric (ed.), The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “The Foundations of Transcendental Idealism: The Origin of Kant’s Distinction between Sensibility and Understanding,” in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide, ed. O’Shea, James (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “The Unconditioned Goodness of the Good Will,” in Kant on Persons and Agency, ed. Watkins, Eric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 1128.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “Breaking with Rationalism: Kant, Crusius, and the Priority of Existence,” in Leibniz and Kant, ed. Look, Brandon (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, “Kant on Real Conditions,” in Proceedings of the 12. International Kant Congress Nature and Freedom, ed. Waibel, Violetta and Ruffing, Margit (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2019), pp. 1133–40.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric, and Willaschek, Marcus, “Kant’s Account of Cognition,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (2017): 83112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric, and Willaschek, Marcus, “Kant on Cognition and Knowledge,” Synthese (2017): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1624-4.CrossRef
Wolff, Christian, Allerhand nützliche Versuche dadurch zu genauer Erkantnis der Natur und Kunst der Weg gebahnet wird (Halle, 1721).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian Cosmologia Generalis, [Frankfurt], reprint of the 2nd edition in Abt. 2, Bd. 4 of Christian Wolff, Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlag, 1964).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Vernünfftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, auch allen Dingen überhaupt, [Halle], reprint of the 11th edition in Abt. 1, Bd. 2 of Christian Wolff, Gesammelte Werke (Hildesheim: G. Olms Verlag, [1719] 1983).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen, Kant’s Moral Religion (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Wood, Allen, Kant’s Rational Theology (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Zilsel, Edward, “The Genesis of the Concept of Physical Law,” Philosophical Review 51 (1942): 245–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Eric Watkins, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant on Laws
  • Online publication: 11 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683026.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Eric Watkins, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant on Laws
  • Online publication: 11 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683026.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Eric Watkins, University of California, San Diego
  • Book: Kant on Laws
  • Online publication: 11 April 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316683026.016
Available formats
×