Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-27v8q Total loading time: 0.778 Render date: 2022-11-29T08:42:35.570Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2020

Allen W. Wood
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Kant and Religion , pp. 216 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert M. (1987). The Virtue of Faith and Other Essays in Philosophical Theology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (1999). Finite and Infinite Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. (2018). Introduction to Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings by Kant, Immanuel. Edited and translated by Wood, Allen and di Giovanni, George. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adickes, Erich (1920). Kants Opus Postumum, Kant-Studien Ergänzungsheft 50.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2011). Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry E. (2018 [1966]). Lessing and the Enlightenment: His Philosophy of Religion and Its Relation to Eighteenth-Century Thought. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Alston, William (1996). “Belief, Acceptance, and Religious Faith.” In Jordan, J (ed.), Freedom and Rationality, pp. 327. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Altman, Matthew (ed.) (2017). The Palgrave Kant Handbook. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Gold, Sharon, and Muchnik, Pablo (eds.) (2010). Kant’s Anatomy of Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1963). Intention. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. 2nd ed. Translated by Irwin, Terence. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Arkush, Allan (1994). Moses Mendelssohn and the Enlightenment. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1994). The Origins of Totalitarianism. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, and Jaspers, Karl (1992). Correspondence, 1926–1969. Edited by Kohler, Lotte and Saner, Hans. Translated by Robert and Rita Kimber. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White (1960). Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: Commentary. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (1987). The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. (1996). The Sovereignty of Reason: The Defense of Rationality in the Early English Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1977). “David Hume and the Sources of German Anti-rationalism.” In Morice, G. P. (ed.), David Hume Bicentenary Papers, pp. 204235. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (2002). Liberty. Edited by Hardy, Henry. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Leonard (1971). Mass. London: Boosey and Hawkes.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard (2002). Radical Evil: A Philosophical Interrogation. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bielefeldt, Heiner (2001). Kants Symbolik: Ein Schlüssel zur kritischen Freiheitsphilosophie. Munich: Alber. [English translation: Symbolic Representation in Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Translated by Heiner Bielefeldt. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.]Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon (1998). Ruling Passions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, Peter (1979). “Kant’s Moral Proof of the Existence of God.Scottish Journal of Theology 32, pp. 333335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, Claudia (2002). The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, Matthew (2007). “Kant on the Diabolical Will: A Neglected Alternative?Kantian Review 12, no. 2, pp. 147157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2006). “Beauty as a Symbol of Natural Systematicity.British Journal of Aesthetics 46, no. 4, pp. 406415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2007). “Belief in Kant.Philosophical Review 116, no. 3, pp. 323360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2010a). “The Devil, the Virgin, and the Envoy: Symbols of Moral Struggle in Religion, Part Two, Section Two.” In Höffe, Otfried (ed.), Kant: Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloβen Vernunft. Klassiker auslegen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2010b). “Real Repugnance and Belief about Things-in-Themselves: A Problem and Kant’s Three Solutions.” In Krueger, James and Lipscomb, Benjamin Bruxvoort (eds.), Kant’s Moral Metaphysics, pp. 177209. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2016). “Rational Hope, Possibility, and Divine Action.” In Michalson (ed.), pp. 98117.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (2018). “Religious Dietary Practices and Secular Food Ethics: Or, How to Hope Your Food Choices Make a Difference Even When You Reasonably Believe They Don’t.” In Barnhill, Anne, Budolfson, Mark, and Doggett, Taylor (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Food Ethics, pp. 287312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chignell, Andrew (ed.) (2019). Evil: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, William Kingdon (1999). The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Conze, Edward (1963). “Spurious Parallels to Buddhist Philosophy.Philosophy East and West 13, no. 2 (July), pp. 105115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coxe, William (1816). Memoirs of Robert Walpole. 4 vols. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.Google Scholar
Cummiskey, David (2017). “Buddhist Modernism and Kant on Enlightenment.” In Emmanuel, Steven (ed.), Buddhist Philosophy: A Comparative Approach, pp. 205220. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalberg-Acton, John (1907). “Letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton,” April 5, 1887. In Figgis, J. N. and Laurence, R. V. (eds.), Historical Essays and Studies, pp. 503508. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald (1963). “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.Journal of Philosophy 60, pp. 685700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Censo, James J. (2012). Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1890). “Der Streit Kants mit der Zensur über das Recht freier Religionsforschung.Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 3, pp. 418–50.Google Scholar
Doris, John M. (2002). Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, John M. (ed.) (2010). The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, John M. (2017). The John L. Doris Memorial Lecture: “Marking Good: Can We Realize Our Moral Aspirations?” www.bctr.cornell.edu/tag/john-doris-memorial-lecture/.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry (2011). Why Marx Was Right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eliot, Thomas Stearns (1963 [1935]). Murder in the Cathedral. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1970 [1790]). Aphorismen über Religion und Deismus. Fichtes Sammtliche Werke. Vol. 5. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: W. deGruyter.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (1970 [1806]). Anweisung zum seligen Leben, oder auch die Religionslehre. Fichtes Sammtliche Werke. Vol. 5. Edited by Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb (2010 [1793]). Attempt at a Critique of All Revelation. Vol. 5 of Fichtes Sammtliche Werke. Translated by Green, G. Edited by Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Firestone, Chris L. (2009). Kant and Theology at the Boundaries of Reason. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Firestone, Chris L., and Jacobs, Nathan (2008). In Defense of Kant’s Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Firestone, Chris L., and Palmquist, Stephen (eds.) (2006). Kant and the New Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin (2010). “Gottesdienst und Afterdienst: Die Kirche als öffentliche Institution?” In Höffe, Otfried (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft, pp. 193210. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1964). The Future of an Illusion. Translated by W. D. Robson-Scott. Revised by James Strachey. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2003). Freedom and Anthropology in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2008). “Empirical Psychology, Common Sense, and Kant’s Empirical Markers for Moral Responsibility.Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 34, pp. 473482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goethe, J. Wolfgang von (1988). Briefe. Edited by Mandelkow, K. R.. Munich: Deutsche Taschenbuch.Google Scholar
Greene, Theodore M. (1960). “The Historical Context and Religious Significance of Kant’s Religion.” Introduction to Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone by Immanuel Kant, pp. viilxxvii. Translated by Greene, Theodore M. and Hudson, Hoyt. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Grenberg, Jeanine (2005). Kant and the Ethics of Humility: A Story of Dependence, Corruption, and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, Charles L. (2007). Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2005). Kant’s System of Nature and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2015). “Moral Worth and Moral Motivation: Kant’s Real View.International Yearbook for German Idealism 13, pp. 1938.Google Scholar
Hare, John E. (1996). The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God’s Assistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert (1999). “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99, pp. 315331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert (2009). “Skepticism about Character Traits.The Journal of Ethics 13, pp. 235242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, Van A. (1996). The Historian and the Believer: The Morality of Historical Knowledge and Christian Belief. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1981). Phenomenology of Spirit. Translated by A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by H. B. Nisbet. Edited by Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara (2002). “Could It Be Worth Thinking about Kant on Sex and Marriage?” In Antony, Louise and Witt, Charlotte (eds.), A Mind of One’s Own. 2nd ed., pp. 5372. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara (2018). “Religion and the Highest Good: Speaking to the Heart of Even the Best of Us.” In Moran, Kate (ed.) Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity, pp. 214230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Hud (1994). Kant’s Compatibilism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1980). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. 2nd ed. Edited by Popkin, Richard. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1983). History of England. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hume, David (1992). The Natural History of Religion. Edited with an introduction by Fieser, James. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hume, David (2007). Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Millican, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Insole, Christopher J. (2016). The Intolerable God. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Kahn, Samuel (2018). “Kant’s Post-1800 Disavowal of the Highest Good Argument for the Existence of God.Kant Yearbook 10, no. 1, pp. 6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Samuel (2019). Kant, Ought Implies Can, the Principle of Alternate Possibilities and Happiness. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kail, P. J. E. (2007). “Understanding Hume’s Natural History of Religion.Philosophical Quarterly 57, no. 227 (April 1), pp. 190211,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Y. A. (1985). Schema and Symbol: A Study of Kant’s Doctrine of Schematism. Amsterdam: Free University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (1980 [1848]). The Sickness unto Death. Translated by Howard Hong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren (2006 [1843]). Fear and Trembling. Translated by Sylvia Walsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamott, Anne (2005). Plan B: Further Thoughts on Faith. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lessing, G. E. (2005). Theological Writings. Edited and translated by Nisbet, H. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice (2017). I, Me, Mine: Back to Kant and Back Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariña, Jacqueline (1997). “Kant on Grace: A Reply to His Critics.Religious Studies 33, pp. 379400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariña, Jacqueline (2009). “Making Sense of Kant’s Highest Good.Kant-Studien 91, no. 3, pp. 329355.Google Scholar
Mariña, Jacqueline (2017). “Kant’s Robust Theory of Grace.International Journal of Philosophy 6, pp. 302320.Google Scholar
Matuštík, Martin Beck (2008). Radical Evil and the Scarcity of Hope. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1969). Jerusalem and Other Jewish Writings. Translated and edited by Alfred Jospe. New York: Shocken.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (1983 [1783]). Jerusalem; Or, On Religious Power and Judaism. Translated by Allan Arkush. London: Brandeis University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (2007 [1767]). Phädon; or, On the Immortality of the Soul. Translated by Patricia Noble. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses (2011 [1785]). Morning Hours: Lectures on God’s Existence. Translated by Daniel Dahlstrom and Corey Dyck. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa (2018). Kant on Reflection and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalson, Gordon (1986). “The Non-moral Element in Kant’s ‘Moral Proof’ of the Existence of God.Scottish Journal of Theology 39, pp. 501515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalson, Gordon (1990). Fallen Freedom: Kant on Radical Evil and Moral Regeneration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalson, Gordon (1999). Kant and the Problem of God. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Michalson, Gordon (ed.) (2016). Cambridge Critical Guide to Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1978). On Liberty. Edited by Rapaport, Elizabeth. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (2001 [1861]). Utilitarianism. 2nd ed. Edited by Sher, George. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel Eyquem (1991). The Complete Essays. Translated by M. A. Screech. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Moors, Martin (2017). “The Fate of Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason.” In Altman (ed.) (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Seiriol (2005). “The Missing Formal Proof of Humanity’s Radical Evil in Kant’s Religion.Philosophical Review 114, no. 1, pp. 63114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Jennifer M., and Paul, Sarah K. (2019). “Grit.Ethics 129, no. 2 (January), pp. 175203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murti, T. R. V. (2008 [1955]). The Central Philosophy of Buddhism: A Study of the Madhyamika System. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick (2008). Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967). On the Genealogy of Morals. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen (1992). “Does Kant Reduce Religion to Morality?Kant-Studien 83, no. 2, pp. 129148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen (2000). Kant’s Critical Religion. Vol. 2 of Kant’s System of Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen (2008), “Kant’s Quasi-transcendental Argument for a Necessary and Universal Evil Propensity in Human Nature.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (Summer), pp. 261297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmquist, Stephen (2015). Comprehensive Commentary on Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Bare Reason. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papish, Laura (2018). Kant on Evil, Self-Deception, and Moral Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascal, Blaise (1995). Pensées. Translated by A. J. Krailsheimer. London: Penguin. Cited by section (§).Google Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence (2014). Guidebook to Kant’s Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence (2017a). “Kant on Faith, Religious Assent, and the Limits of Knowledge.” In Altman (ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence (2017b). “The ‘Two Experiments’ in Kant’s Religion: Dismantling the Conundrum.” Kantian Review 22, pp. 107131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternack, Lawrence, and Rossi, Philip (2014). “Kant’s Philosophy of Religion.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/kant-religion/.Google Scholar
Plato, (1980). Gorgias. Translated by Terence Irwin. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (2002) Moral Writings. Edited by MacAdam, J. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (2005 [1729]). De jure naturae et gentium (On the Law of Nature and of Nations), Fourth Edition, … To Which Is Now Prefixed Mr. Barbeyrac’s Prefatory Discourse, … Done into English by Mr. [George] Carew, Buffalo, NY, William S. Hein; reprint of London: S. Aris.Google Scholar
Quinn, Philip (1978). Divine Commands and Moral Requirements. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, Matthew Alun (2003). Subjectivity and Irreligion: Atheism and Agnosticism in Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (2010). “On the Guise of the Good.” In Tenenbaum, S (ed.), Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good. Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews (1988). “Two Conceptions of the Highest Good in Kant.Journal of the History of Philosophy 26, no. 4 (October), pp. 593619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhold, Karl Leonhard (2005). Letters on the Kantian Philosophy. Edited by Ameriks, K. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Franz (1985 [1930]). The Star of Redemption. Translated by Willam Hallo. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. (2002). The Right and the Good. Edited by Stratton-Lake., Philip Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Philip, and Wreen, Michael (eds.) (1991). Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Re-examined. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1997). The Discourses and Other Political Writings. Edited by Gourevitch, Victor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, William L. (1968). Religious Symbols and God: A Philosophical Study of Tillich’s Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah (2008 [1908]). The Philosophy of Loyalty. London: Macmillan; Reprint: BiblioLife.Google Scholar
Sala, G. B. (2004). “The Christology in Kant’s Religion.” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 96, no. 2–3, pp. 235304.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1956). Being and Nothingness. Translated by Hazel Barnes. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Savage, Denis (1988). “Kant’s Rejection of Divine Revelation and his Theory of Radical Evil.” In Rossi, Philip J. and Wreen, Michael (eds.), Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered, pp. 5475. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar (2006). “Kantian Rigorism and Mitigating Circumstances.Ethics 117, no. 1, pp. 3257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst (1998). “Review of Immanuel Kant’s Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1799).” From Athenaeum 2, no. 2, translated by Jacqueline Mariña, New Athenaeum, pp. 1131.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1958). The World as Will and Representation. Vol. 1. Translated by E. J. F. Payne. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Schott, Robin May (1988). Cognition and Eros: A Critique of the Kantian Paradigm. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Schrift, A. D. (ed.) (2005). Modernity and the Problem of Evil. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, Albert (2005 [1911]). Quest for the Historical Jesus. Translated by W. Montgomery. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Setiya, Kieran (2007). Reasons without Rationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shantz, Douglas H. (2013). An Introduction to German Pietism: Protestant Renewal at the Dawn of Modern Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1981). Methods of Ethics. 7th ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Silber, John (1960). “The Ethical Significance of Kant’s Religion.” Introduction to Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone by Kant, Immanuel, pp. tk–tk. Translated by Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt Hudson. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Silber, John (1991). “Kant at Auschwitz.” In Funke, G and Seebohm, T. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress, pp. 177211. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America.Google Scholar
Silber, John (2012). Kant’s Ethics. Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Upton (1934). I, Candidate for Governor, and How I Got Licked. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (2000). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch (1982 [1677]). Ethics and Selected Letters. Translated by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert (2004). “Does ‘Ought’ Imply ‘Can’? And Did Kant Think It Does?Utilitas 16, no. 1, pp. 4261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoeffler, F. Ernest (1973). German Pietism during the Eighteenth Century. Studies in the History of Religion 24. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David (2001). The Idea of Humanity: Anthropology and Anthroponomy in Kant’s Ethics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David (2005). “Perversity of the Heart.Philosophical Review 114, no. 2, pp. 153177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David (2009). “For Badness’ Sake.Journal of Philosophy 106, no. 11, pp. 613628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard (2004). The Existence of God. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio (2007). Appearances of the Good: An Essay on Practical Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, Oliver (ed.) (2011). Rethinking Kant. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul (1951, 1957, 1963). Systematic Theology. 3 vols. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul (1952). The Courage to Be. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul (1957). Dynamics of Faith. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David (1992). “The Guise of the Good.Noûs 26, pp. 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, Owen (2009). “The Duty of Self-Knowledge.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LXXIX, no. 3, pp. 671698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Eric (2005). Kant and the Metaphysics of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, Janice Dean (2008). Dreaming Me: Black, Baptist, and Buddhist. Sommerville, MA: Wisdom.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1991). “Conundrums in Kant’s Rational Religion.” In Rossi, Philip J. and Wreen, Michael (eds.), Kant’s Philosophy of Religion Reconsidered, pp. 4053. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1998). “Is It Possible and Desirable for Theologians to Recover from Kant?Modern Theology 1, no. 1, pp. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (1970, 2009). Kant’s Moral Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1978, 2009). Kant’s Rational Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1984). “Kant’s Compatibilism.” In Wood, Allen (ed.), Self and Nature in Kant’s Philosophy, pp. 73–10. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1992). “Rational Theology, Moral Faith, and Religion.” In Guyer, Paul (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant, pp. 394417. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (2002). Unsettling Obligations: Essays on Reason, Reality, and the Ethics of Belief. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2005). Kant. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2008). Kantian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2010). “Ethical Community, Church, and Scripture.” In Höffe, O (ed.), Kant: Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloβen Vernunft. Klassiker auslegen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2012). “Recht und Universität bei Kant.” In Honnefelder, Ludger et. al. (eds.), Kants Streit der Fakultäten: Oder der Bildung zwischen Lebenswelt und Wissenschaften, pp. 5476. Berlin: Berlin University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2014). The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (2015). “Kant on the History of Ethics.” In Sensen, O and Denis, L (eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide, pp. 120137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (2017). Formulas of the Moral Law. Kant Elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Allen (2019). “Evil in Classical German Philosophy: Evil, Selfhood, and Despair.” In Chignell (ed.), pp. 322348.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel (2010). “Kant’s Account of Practical Fanaticism.” In Lipscomb, Benjamin and Krueger, James (eds.), Kant’s Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality, pp. 291317. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Allen W. Wood, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Kant and Religion
  • Online publication: 08 May 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381512.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Allen W. Wood, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Kant and Religion
  • Online publication: 08 May 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381512.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Allen W. Wood, Stanford University, California
  • Book: Kant and Religion
  • Online publication: 08 May 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381512.011
Available formats
×