Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T04:17:54.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Yoko Hasegawa
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Japanese
A Linguistic Introduction
, pp. 369 - 383
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, Taro. 1995. Tekara to ato(de): Dekigoto no keikiteki setsuzoku. In Nihongo ruigi hyōgen no bunpō II, ed. Miyajima, Tatsuo and Nitta, Yoshio, 547–53. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1985. Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language 61: 625–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfonso, Anthony. 1971. On the “adversative” passive. The Journal – Newsletter of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 7 (1): 1–7. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amanuma, Yasushi. 1988. Kokugo mondai no rekishi. In Nihongo hyakka daijiten, ed. Kindaichi, Haruhiko, Hayashi, Oki, and Shibata, Takeshi, 1229–38. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Aoki, Haruo. 1986. Evidentials in Japanese. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. Chafe, Wallace and Nichols, Johanna, 223–38. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
Arisaka, Hideyo. 1957. Jōdai ni okeru sa-gyō no tōon. In Kokugo on’inshi no kenkyū, 145–59. Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Arita, Setsuko. 1993. Nihongo jōkenbun kenkyū no hensen. In Nihongo no jōken hyōgen, ed. Masuoka, Takashi, 225–78. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Arita, Setsuko. 2007. Nihongo jōkenbun to jiseisetusei. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Aston, William. 1904. A Grammar of the Japanese Written Language. .
Atkinson, Richard, and Shiffrin, Richard. 1968. Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, ed. Spence, Kenneth and Spence, Janet, 89–195. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Atsuji, Tetsuji. 1994. Kanji no bunkashi. Tokyo: NHK Publishing.Google Scholar
Austin, John. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Barnlund, Dean, and Araki, Shoko. 1985. Intercultural encounters: the management of compliments by Japanese and Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 16 (1): 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Robert. 1981. Logic. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie, Takahashi, Tomoko, and Uliss-Weltz, Robin. 1990. Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language, ed. Scarcella, Robin, Andersen, Elaine, and Krashen, Stephen, 55–73. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen. 1978/1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blackless, Melanie, Charuvastra, Anthony, Derryck, Amanda, Fausto-Sterling, Anne, Lauzanne, Karl, and Lee, Ellen. 2000. How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology 12: 151–66.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Olshtain, Elite. 1984. Requests and apologies: a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5 (3): 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunkachō, . 2004. Heisei 15 nendo kokugo ni kansuru yoronchōsa no kekka ni tsuite. .
Bunkachō, . 2007. Keigo no shishin. .
Cameron, Deborah. ed. 1998. The Feminist Critique of Language: A Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, ed. Li, Charles, 25–56. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, ed. Anderson, Stephen and Kiparsky, Paul, 232–86. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia. 1986. The Acquisition of Japanese. In The Acquisition of Japanese, ed. Clancy, Patricia and Slobin, Dan, 373–524. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia, Thompson, Sandra, Suzuki, Ryoko, and Tao, Hongyin. 1996. The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 355–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, William. 1972. To Walk in Seasons: An Introduction to Haiku. Rutland, Vermont: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko. 1990. The sentence-final particle ne as a tool for cooperation in Japanese conversation. In Japanese Korean Linguistics, ed. Hoji, Hajime, 29–44. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko. 1992. Meanings of non-referential indexes: a case study of Japanese sentence-final particle ne. Text 12: 507–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko. 2006. Japanese politeness as an interactional achievement: academic consultation sessions in Japanese universities. Multilingua 25: 269–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Haruko. 2008. Socializing Identities Through Speech Style. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1985. Direct and indirect speech: general problems and problems of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daikuhara, Midori. 1986. A study of compliments from a cross-cultural perspective: Japanese vs. American English. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 2 (2): 103–34. .Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith. 1967. Reasons and causes. In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Volume 7, ed. Edwards, Paul, 85–88. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1990. Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. Papers from the Twenty-sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 137–62.
Fishman, Pamela. 1983. Interaction: the work women do. In Language, Gender, and Society, ed. Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris, and Henley, Nancy, 89–101. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and Narrativity. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, and Thompson, Sandra. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In Interaction and Grammar, ed. Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel, and Thompson, Sandra, 134–84. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, Dennis. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1: 126–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Seiko Yamaguchi. 1993. The use and learning of clause-linkage: case studies in Japanese and English conditionals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Fujii, Seiko. 2004. Lexically (un)filled constructional schemes and construction types: the case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. In Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective, ed. Fried, Mirjam and Östman, Jan-Ola, 121–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya, and Sugito, Miyoko. 1977. Onsei no butsuriteki seishitsu. In Iwanami Kōza Nihongo 5: On’in, 63–106. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Yoichi. 1983. Hōgengaku genron. Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Fukada, Atsushi, and Asato, Noriko. 2004. Universal politeness theory: application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1991–2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Wolf-Peter. 1985. On a semantic typology of conditional sentences. Folia Linguistica 19: 365–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1982. Tense–aspect-modality: the creole proto-type and beyond. In Tense–Aspect: Between Semantics & Pragmatics, ed. Hopper, Paul, 115–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. The neglected situation. American Anthropologist 66 (6): 133–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, ed. Greenberg, Joseph, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Speech Acts, ed. Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Haberman, Clyde. 1988. Some Japanese (one) urge plain speaking. In The New York Times. .
Habu, Junko. 2004. Ancient Jomon of Japan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, and Wekker, Herman. 1984. The syntax and interpretation of futurate conditionals in English. Journal of Linguistics 20 (1): 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, Michael, and Horai, Satoshi. 1995. Y chromosomal DNA variation and the peopling of Japan. The American Journal of Human Genetics 56: 951–62. .Google Scholar
Hanihara, Kazuro. 1991. Dual structure model for the population history of the Japanese. Japan Review 2: 1–33. .Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert, and Honoré, Anthony. 1959. Causation in the Law. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1988. Question pull: a diagnostic test for the complement/adjunct distinction in Japanese. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 66–77. .
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1989. Questioning vs. identifying: a functional analysis of the [A candidate that which professor recommend was hired?] construction in Japanese. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 138–49. .
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1992. On the ambiguity between the perfect and the resultative: evidence from V-te ar- constructions in Japanese. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 88–99. .
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1995. Against marking accent locations in Japanese textbooks. Japanese-Language Education Around the Globe 5: 95–103. .Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1996a. A Study of Japanese Clause Linkage: The Connective TE in Japanese. Stanford and Tokyo: CSLI; Kurosio.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1996b. The (nonvacuous) semantics of TE-linkage in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 763–90. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1999a. Pitch accent and vowel devoicing in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 523–26. .
Hasegawa, Yoko. 1999b. Tense-aspect controversy revisited: the ‑TA and ‑RU forms in Japanese. In Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, ed. Verschueren, Jef, 225–40. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association. .Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2006. Embedded soliloquy and affective stances in Japanese. In Emotive Communication in Japanese, ed. Suzuki, Satoko, 209–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2010. Soliloquy in Japanese and English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2011. The Routledge Course in Japanese Translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko. 2012. Deictic and anaphoric uses of the Japanese demonstratives, ko-so-a. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 28: 43–59. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko, and Hata, Kazue. 1992. Fundamental frequency as an acoustic cue to accent perception. Language and Speech 35: 87–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasegawa, Yoko, and Hirose, Yukio. 2005. What the Japanese language tells us about the alleged Japanese relational self. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25: 219–51. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko, Kambara, Wakae, Komatsu, Noriko, Baker, Yasuko Konno, Nonaka, Kayo, Shibahara, Chika, Tomizuka, Miwako, and Yamaguchi, Kimiaki. 2005. Elementary Japanese, Volume 1. Boston: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Yoko, Lee-Goldman, Russell, Ohara, Kyoko Hirose, Fujii, Seiko, and Fillmore, Charles. 2010. On expressing measurement and comparison in English and Japanese. In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar, ed. Boas, Hans, 169–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, Osamu. 1990. Hobun hyōshiki “no” “koto” no bunpu ni kakawaru imi kisoku. Kokugogaku 163: 101–12.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Shinkichi. 1938. Kokugo on’in no hensen. Kokugo to Kokubungaku October: 3–40. .
Hashimoto, Shinkichi. 1980. Kodai kokugo no on’in ni tsuite – Hoka 2 hen. Tokyo: Iwanami. .Google Scholar
Hattori, Shiro. 1951. Genshi nihongo no akusento. In Kokugo akusento ronsō, eds. Terakawa, Kishio, Kindaichi, Haruhiko, and Masayuki, Inagaki, 45–65. Tokyo: Hōsei Daigaku Shuppankyoku.Google Scholar
Hattori, Shiro. 1976. Jōdai Nihongo no boin-taikei to boin-chōwa. Gekkan Gengo 5 (6): 2–14.Google Scholar
Hayata, Teruhiro. 1999. Onchō no taiporojī. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Hayatsu, Emiko, and Ko, Kyoungmi. 2012. Kōpasu ni motozuku nihongo shiekibun, tadōshibun no jittai. Tokyo: Global COE Program, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto, and Mori, Junko. 1998. Co-construction in Japanese revisited: we do “finish each other’s sentences.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics Volume 7, ed. Akatsuka, Noriko, Hoji, Hajime, Iwasaki, Shoichi, Sohn, Sung-Ock, and Strauss, Susan, 77–93. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Himeno, Tomoko. 1991. Irai to kanyū: Juekisha hyōgen no nichi-ei taishō o chūshin ni. Japanese-language Education around the Globe 1: 69–81. .Google Scholar
Hinds, John, and Tawa, Wako. 1975. Conditions on conditionals in Japanese. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 4: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hino, Sukezumi. 1986. Nihon no hōgengaku. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, and Ohala, John. 1994. Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirose, Yukio. 1995. Direct and indirect speech as quotations of public and private expression. Lingua 95: 223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12, Discourse and Syntax, ed. Givón, Talmy, 213–41. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Thompson, Sandra. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61: 121–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1748. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. .
Ide, Sachiko. 1982. Japanese sociolinguistics: politeness and women’s language. Lingua 57: 357–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 8: 223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1991. How and why do women speak more politely in Japanese? In Aspects of Japanese Women’s Language, ed. Ide, Sachiko and McGloin, Naomi, 63–79. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko, Hill, Beverly, Carnes, Yukiko, Ogino, Tsunao, and Kawasaki, Akiko. 1992. The concept of politeness: an empirical study of American English and Japanese. In Politeness in Language Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, ed. Watts, Richard, Ide, Sachiko, and Ehlich, Konrad, 281–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ikawa-Smith, Fumiko. 1978. The history of early paleolithic research in Japan. In Early Paleolithic in South & East Asia, ed. Ikawa-Smith, Fumiko, 247–86. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikuta, Shoko. 1983. Speech level shift and conversational strategy in Japanese discourse. Language Sciences 5: 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, Masaru. 1997. Moshi moshi, kippu o otosaremashita yo. Gekkan Gengo 26 (2): 62–67.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako. 2004. Gender, language, and modernity: toward an effective history of “Japanese women’s language.” In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology, ed. Okamoto, Shigeko and Smith, Janet, 315–30. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako. 2006. Vicarious Language: Gender and Linguistic Modernity in Japan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ishihara, Noriko, and Cohen, Andrew. 2010. Teaching and Learning Pragmatics: Where Language and Culture Meet. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Ito, Masamitsu. 2007. Zasshi ni mirareru gaikokugo to gairaigo. .
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2002. Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwasaki, Takashi. 1995. “Node” to “kara”. In Nihongo ruigihyōgen no bunpō II, ed. Miyajima, Tatsuo and Nitta, Yoshio, 506–13. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Izuhara, Eiko. 2003. Shūjoshi “yo”, “yone”, “ne” saikō. The Journal of Aichi Gakuin University 51 (2): 1–15.Google Scholar
Izui, Hisanosuke. 1967. Gengo no kōzō. Tokyo: Kinokuniya.Google Scholar
Josephs, Lewis. 1972. Phenomena of tense and aspect in Japanese relative clauses. Language 48 (1): 109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabashima, Tadao. 1977. Kanji kara rōmaji made: nihongo hyōki taikei no keisei. In Nihongo no rekishi, ed. Sakakura, Atsuyoshi, 115–54. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro. 1996. Dōshi imiron: gengo to ninchi no setten. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kamada, Osamu. 1988. Nihongo no dentatsu hyōgen. Nihongogaku 7: 59–72.Google Scholar
Kamada, Osamu. 2000. Nihongo no in’yō. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobō.Google Scholar
Kamei, Takashi, Oto, Tokihiko, and Yamada, Toshio. eds. 2007. Nihongo no rekishi: atarashii kougo e no ayumi. Tokyo: Heibonsha.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1994. The theory of territory of information: the case of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1995. Territory of information in English and Japanese and psychological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katagiri, Yasuhiro. 1995. Shūjoshi ni yoru taiwa chōsei. Gekkan Gengo 24: 38–45.Google Scholar
Katagiri, Yasuhiro. 2007. Dialogue functions of Japanese sentence-final particles “yo” and “ne.”Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1313–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Masanobu. 2009. On’in gaisetsu. In Kōza Hōgengaku 1: Hōgen Gaisetsu, 69–95. Tokyo: Tosho Kankōkai.Google Scholar
Kato, Shigehiro. 2001. Bunmatsu joshi “ne” “yo” no danwa kōsei kinō. Toyama Daigaku Jinbun Gakubu Kiyō 35: 31–48.Google Scholar
Kawamoto, Takao. 1980. Nihongo no Genryū – Nantōgo Kigenron. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Kenkyūjo, Kokuritsu Kokugo. 1955. Danwago no Jittai. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
Kenkyūjo, Kokuritsu Kokugo. 1958. Gendaigo no goichōsa, Part II. .
Kenkyūjo, Kokuritsu Kokugo. 1964. Gendai zasshi 90-shu no yōji yōgo, Part III.
Keshikawa, Ritsuji. 1983. Aichiken no hōgen. In Kōza hōgengaku 6: Chūbu Chihō no Hōgen, ed. Iitoyo, Kiichi, Hino, Sukezumi, and Sato, Ryoichi, 207–41. Tokyo: Tosho Kankōkai.Google Scholar
Kibe, Nobuko. 1999. Hōgen onsei/akusento no genzai. In Tenbō: Gendai no Hōgen, ed. Sanada, Shinji, 33–61. Tokyo: Hakuteisha.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1950. Kokugo dōshi no ichi bunrui. Gengo Kenkyū 15: 48–63.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1953. On’in. In Nihon Hōgengaku, ed. Tojo, Misao, 87–176. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 1984. “Iru, aru, oru”: sonzai hyōgen no rekishi to hōgen. Eureka 16 (12): 284–93.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 1997. The influence of translation on the historical development of the Japanese passive construction. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 759–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2003. Vācharu nihongo: Yakuwarigo no nazo. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi, and Takubo, Yukinori. 1992. Danwa kanri riron kara mita nihongo no shijishi. In Shijishi, ed. Kinsui, Satoshi and Takubo, Yukinori, 123–49. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobō.Google Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi, and Takubo, Yukinori. 1998. Danwa kanri riron ni motozuku “yo, ne, yone” no kenkyū. In Onsei ni yoru Ningen to Kikai no Taiwa, ed. Doshita, Shuji et al., 257–70. Tokyo: Ohmsha.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul, and Kiparsky, Carol. 1970. Fact. In Progress in Linguistics: A Collection of Papers, ed. Bierwisch, Manfred and Heidolph, Karl, 143–56. Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1992. The present perfect puzzle. Language 68: 525–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, Takashi. 1999. Hōgen goi/hyōgenhō no genzai. In Tenbō: Gendai no Hōgen, ed. Sanada, Shinji, 62–80. Tokyo: Hakuteisha.Google Scholar
Kokugogakkai, . 1980. Kokugogaku Daijiten. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Komatsu, Hideo. 1981. Nihongo no on’in. Tokyo: Chūō Kōron.Google Scholar
Komatsu, Hideo. 1999/2001. Nihongo wa Naze Henka suru ka. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Komatsu, Hideo. 2001. Nihongo no Rekishi. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Komatsu, Hideo. 1988. Tōkyōgo ni okeru danjosa no keisei: Shūjoshi o chūshin to shite. Kokugo to Kokubungaku 65: 94–106.Google Scholar
Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1989. Come, stay, finish: on the development of aspect markers in interlanguage and pidgin/creole languages. In Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Symposium on Aspectology, ed, Larsson, Lars-Gunner, 33–48. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Kouchi, Makiko. 1983. Geographic Variation in Modern Japanese Somatometric Data and Its Interpretation. University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo. 2001. On the markedness of diphthongs. Kobe Papers in Linguistics 3: 60–73.Google Scholar
Kudo, Mayumi. 1985. No, koto no tsukaiwake to dōshi no shurui. Kokubungaku Kaishaku to Kanshō 50 (3): 45–52.Google Scholar
Kunihiro, Tetsuya. 1967. Kōzōteki imiron – Nichi-ei Ryōgo Taishō Kenkyū. Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1988. Blended quasi-direct discourse in Japanese. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, ed. Poser, William, 75–102. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1972. The categorical and the thetic judgment: evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 9: 153–85.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1979/1992. (Ko) so a ni tsuite. In Shijishi, ed. Kinsui, Satoshi and Takubo, Yukinori, 91–104. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobō.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1982. A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness, or, minding your p’s and q’s. In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 295–305.
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Reference. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Volume 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Nagiko. 1998. Hatsuwa kōi (speech act) ni arawareru gengo bunka – Nihongo bogowasha no tokuchō. Ritsumeikan Keizaigaku 46 (6): 778–92.Google Scholar
Leonard, Wesley. 2001. A comparative study of the English while with Japanese nagara & aida ni: an investigation of semantics, usage restrictions, and prominence. Unpublished MS. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Department of Linguistics.
Maeda, Naoko. 1995. Ba, to, tara, nara. In Nihongo Ruigihyōgen no Bunpō II, ed. Miyajima, Tatsuo and Nitta, Yoshio, 483–95. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel, and Borker, Ruth. 1982. A cultural approach to male–female miscommunication. In Language and Social Identity, ed. Gumperz, John, 196–216. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel. 1962. Essential Japanese – An Introduction to the Standard Colloquial Japanese. Rutland, Vermont: Tuttle.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel. 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mashimo, Saburo. 1969. Fujingo no Kenkyū. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Maslov, Jurij. 1988. Resultative, perfect, and aspect. In Typology of Resultative Constructions, ed. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P., 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi. 1991. Modaritī no Bunpō. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi. 1993a. Nihongo no Jōken Hyōgen. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi. 1993b. Nihongo no jōken hyōgen ni tsuite. In Nihongo no Jōken Hyōgen, ed. Masuoka, Takashi, 1–20. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi. 1997. Fukubun. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Katsumi. 2003. Nihongo no keitō – ruikei chirironteki kōsatsu. In Perspectives on the Origins of the Japanese Language, ed. Osada, Toshiki and Vovin, Alexander, 41–129. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. Grammar and semantics of adnominal clauses in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Matsumura, Yoshiko, and Chinami, Kyoko. 1998. Nihongo danwa ni okeru sutairu kōtai no jittai to sono kōka. Gengokagaku 33: 109–18.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1987. Thematization as a staging device in Japanese narrative. In Perspectives on Topicalization: The Case of Japanese Wa, ed. Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko, and Iwasaki, Shoichi, 57–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1990. Conversation management in contrast: listener response in Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 392–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1991. Pragmatics of discourse modality: a case of da and desu/masu forms in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 551–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1996. Multivoicedness in speech and thought representation: the case of self-quotation in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Senko. 1997. Japanese Communication: Language and Thought in Context. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
McGloin, Naomi Hanaoka. 1976. The speaker’s attitude and the conditionals to, tara, and ba. Papers in Japanese Linguistics: 181–91.CrossRef
McGloin, Naomi Hanaoka. 1987. The role of wa in negation. In Perspectives in Topicalization: The Case of Japanese ‘Wa’, ed. Hinds, John, Maynard, Senko, and Iwasaki, Shoichi, 165–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura. 1993. Toward a grammar of aspect: the case of the English perfect constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Mikami, Akira. 1953. Gendai gohō Josetsu. Tokyo: Tōkō Shoin.Google Scholar
Mikami, Akira. 1970/1992. Kosoado-shō. In Shijishi, ed. Kinsui, Satoshi and Takubo, Yukinori, 35–37. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobō.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy. 1967. The Japanese Language. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy. 1971. Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy. 1975. Do the Japanese know how to tell time?The Journal of the Association of Teachers of Japanese 10: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, Akira. 1974. The V-u form vs. the V-ta form. Papers in Japanese Linguistics 3: 95–121.Google Scholar
Miyajima, Tatsuo. 1971. Koten Taishō Goihyō. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Miyake, Tomohiro. 1995. Rashii to yōda. In Nihongo ruigi Hyōgen no Bunpō I: Tanbun-hen, ed. Miyajima, Tatsuo and Nitta, Yoshio, 183–89. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Miyata, Koichi. 1927. Nihongo no akusentokan to akusento hyōkihō. Onsei no Kenkyū 1: 18–22.Google Scholar
Mizutani, Nobuko. 1984. Nihongo kyōiku to hanashikotoba no jittai: aizuchi no bunseki. In Kindaichi Haruhiko hakase koki kinen Ronbunshū, 261–79. Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Morita, Yoshiyuki. 1989. Goi. In Nihongo Gaisetsu, ed. Kato, Akihiko, Saji, Keizo, and Morita, Yoshiyuki, 65–93. Tokyo: Ōfūsha.Google Scholar
Morita, Yoshiyuki. 1994. Dōshi no Imironteki Bunpō Kenkyū. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Moriyama, Takuro. 1989. Ninshiki no mūdo to sono shūhen. In Nihongo no Modaritī, ed. Nitta, Yoshio and Masuoka, Takashi, 57–120. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Moriyama, Takuro. 1995. To omou, hazuda, ni chigai nai, darō, fukushi ~Ø. In Nihongo ruigi Hyōgen no Bunpō I: Tanbun-hen, ed. Miyajima, Tatsuo and Nitta, Yoshio, 171–82. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Murayama, Shichiro. 1974. Nantōgo kigensetu ni tsuite. Gekkan Gengo 3 (1): 11–18.Google Scholar
Murayama, Shichiro. 1988. Nihongo no Kigen to Gogen. Tokyo: San’ichi Shobō.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Japanese reportive evidentiality and the pragmatics of retelling. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1361–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamoto, Masachie. 1981. Nihongo no genkei. Tokyo: Rikitomi Shobō.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Keiko. 2001. Gender and language in Japanese preschool children. Research on Language and Social Interaction 34: 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Momoko. 2006. Gengo ideorogī to shite no “onna kotoba”: meijiki “jogakusei kotoba” no seiritsu. In Nihongo to Jendā, ed. Sasaki, Mizue, 121–38. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobō.Google Scholar
Nakane, Chie. 1970. Japanese Society. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Nakau, Minoru. 1994. Ninchi Imiron no Genri. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir, and Je Jaxontov, Sergey. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In Typology of Resultative Constructions, ed. Nedjalkov, Vladimir, 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustupný, Jiri. 1982. Gaikokujin to no Komyunikēshon. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Nitta, Yoshio. 1989. Gendai nihongo-bun no modaritī no taikei to kōzō. In Nihongo no Modaritī, ed. Nitta, Yoshio and Masuoka, Takashi, 1–56. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Noda, Harumi. 1995. No to koto. In Nihongo ruigi Hyōgen no Bunpō 2: Fukubun, Renbun-hen, ed. Moriyama, Takuro and Nitta, Yoshio, 419–28. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Noda, Harumi. 1997. No (da) no kinō. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Nomura, Masaaki. 1988. Nihongo no kanji. In Nihongo Hyakka Daijiten, ed. Kindaichi, Haruhiko, Hayashi, Oki, and Shibata, Takeshi, 329–45. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Ochs Keenan, Elinor. 1976. The universality of conversational postulates. Language in Society 5: 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1993. Indexing gender. In Sex and Gender Hierarchies, ed. Miller, Barbara, 146–69. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. Gumperz, John and Levinson, Stephen, 407–37. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound–symbolic use of voice pitch. In Sound Symbolism, ed. Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, and Ohala, John, 325–47. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohara, Kyoko Hirose. 1996. A constructional approach to Japanese internally headed relativization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Ohso, Mieko. 1986. Goyō-bunseki I “kyō wa ii tenki desu ne.” – “Hai, sō desu.”Nihongogaku 5: 91–95.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Masataka. 2009. Gengo futsū no rettō kara tan’itsu gengo hatsugen e no kiseki. Fukuoka kenritsu daigaku ningen shakai gakubu kiyō 17 (2): 11–31. .Google Scholar
Okamoto, Noriko. 1997. Kyōshitsu-danwa ni okeru buntai-shifuto no shihyōteki kinō: Teineitai to futsūtai no tsukaiwake. Nihongogaku 16: 39–51.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko. 1997. Social context, linguistic ideology, and indexical expressions in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 795–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko, and Sato, Shie. 1992. Less feminine speech among young Japanese females. In Proceedings of the Second Women and Language Conference, ed. Hall, Kira, Bucholtz, Mary, and Moonwomon, Birch, 478–88. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Okubo, Ai. 1967. Yōji gengo no hattatsu. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Okumura, Mitsuo. 1980. Rendaku. In Kokugogaku Daijiten, ed. Gakkai, Kokugo, 925–26. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Okutsu, Keiichiro. 1967. Jidōka, tadōka oyobi ryōkyokuka tenkei: Ji-ta dōshi no taiō. Kokugogaku 70: 46–66.Google Scholar
Omoto, Keiichi. 1978. Blood protein polymorphisms and the problem of genetic affinities of the Ainu. In Evolutionary Models and Studies in Human Diversity, ed. Meier, Robert, Otten, Charlotte. and Abdel-Hameed, Fathi, 333–41. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
Onishi, Takuichiro. 1993. Nihon no hōgen gaisetsu. In Hōgen to nihongo kyōiku, 1–83. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
Ono, Susumu. 1957. Nihongo no kigen. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Ono, Susumu. 1981. Nihongo to Tamirugo. Tokyo: Shinchōsha.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Yoshida, Eri. 1996. A study of co-construction in Japanese: we don’t finish each other’s sentences. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Volume 5, ed. Akatsuka, Noriko, Iwasaki, Shoichi, and Strauss, Susan, 115–29. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Onoe, Keisuke. 1995. Grounding keishiki to shite no shita, shiteiru. Paper presented at CLC Gengogaku Shūchū Kōgi.
Osada, Natsuki. 1974. Nihongo hoppōkigensetsu – Arutaigaku no tachiba kara. Gekkan Gengo 3 (1): 2–10.Google Scholar
Osada, Toshiki. 2003. Nihongo tōkeiron wa naze hayaranakunatta no ka – Nihongo tōkeiron no genzai, kako, mirai. In Perspectives on the Origins of the Japanese Language, ed. Osada, Toshiki and Vovin, Alexander, 373–418. Kyoto: International Research Center for Japanese Studies.Google Scholar
Ota, Akira. 1972. Tense correlations in English and Japanese. In Studies in Honor of Albert H. Marckwardt, ed. Alatis, James E., 121–34. Washington, DC: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Beckman, Mary. 1988. Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara. 2003. Re-examining politeness, face and the Japanese language. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1471–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poser, William. 1985. The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Russell, Bartland. 1917. Mysticism and Logic. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel, and Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4): 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1985. Writing Systems. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanada, Shinji. 2002. Hōgen no Nihon Chizu: Kotoba no tabi. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Sanders, José, and Sweetser, Eve. 2009. Causality, cognition and communication: a mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In Causal Categories in Discourse and Cognition, ed. Sanders, Ted and Sweetser, Eve, 19–59. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satake, Hideo. 1988. Hyōki kōdō to kisoku. In Nihongo Hyakka Daijiten, ed. Kindaichi, Haruhiko, Hayashi, Oki, and Shibata, Takeshi, 310–19. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Sato, Ryoichi. 1979. Hōgen no bunpu. In Nihon no Hōgen Chizu, ed. Tokugawa, Munemasa, 3–52. Tokyo: Chūōkōronsha.Google Scholar
Sato, Sekiko. 2006. “Genji monogatari” to gendā: “Shukusei” o iwanu onnnagimi. In Nihongo to Jendā, ed. Sasaki, Mizue, 109–20. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobō.Google Scholar
Sato, Takuzo. 2005. Jidōshibun to Tadōshibun no Imiron. Tokyo: Kasama Shoin.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense variation in narrative. Language 57: 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeley, Christopher. 2000. A History of Writing in Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Sei Shōnagon, ca. 1000/1991. The Pillow Book of Sei Shonagon. trans. by Morris, Ivan. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, Edward. 1989. On trying to translate Japanese. In The Craft of Translation, ed. Biguenet, John and Schulte, Rainer, 142–53. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, Edward, and Nasu, Kiyoshi. 1962. Nohongo rashii Hyōgen kara eigo rashii Hyōgen e. Tokyo: Baifūkan.Google Scholar
Sell, Roger. 1992. Literary texts and diachronic aspects of politeness. In Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory, and Practice, ed. Watts, Richard, Ide, Sachiko, and Ehlich, Konrad, 109–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shibata, Takeshi. 1958. Nihon no Hōgen. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: a prototype analysis. Language 61: 821–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1994. An integrational approach to possessor raising, ethical datives, and adversative passives. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 461–85.
Shibuya, Katsumi. 1999. Hōgen bunpō no genzai. In Tenbō: Gendai no Hōgen, ed. Sanada, Shinji, 81–99. Tokyo: Hakuteisha.Google Scholar
Shimizu, Yoshinori. 2003. Nihongo Hisshō Kōza. bunko, Kodansha. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Shirakawa, Hiroyuki. 1995. Riyū o arawasanai “kara”. In Fukubun no Kenkyū I, ed. Nitta, Yoshio, 189–219. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Shōgaku, Tosho. ed. 1981. Kokugo Daijiten. Tokyo: Shōgakkan.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, ed. Dixon, Robert, 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Smith, Tomoko Yamashita. 2005. Affectedness constructions: how languages indicate positive and negative events. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Soga, Matsuo. 1983. Tense and Aspect in Modern Colloquial Japanese. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Sugito, Miyoko. 1969/1982. Nihongo Akusento no Kenkyū. Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Sugito, Miyoko. 1998. Nihon rettō Kotoba no Tanken. Tokyo: Fujitsū BSC.Google Scholar
Sunakawa, Yuriko. 2011. Hakereru, mirereru. In Mondai na Nihongo: Sono 4, ed. Kitahara, Yasuo, 124–29. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Kazuhiko. 1977. Bunpō no utsurikawari. In Nihongo no Rekishi, ed. Sakakura, Atsuyoshi, 197–242. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Mutsumi. 1997. Nihongo-kyōiku ni okeru teineitai-sekai to futsūtai-sekai. In Shiten to Gengo-kōdō, ed. Takubo, Yukinori, 45–76. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shigeyuki. 1965. Gendai Nihongo no dōshi no tensu. Tokyo: Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Takashi, and Usami, Mayumi. 2006. Co-constructions in English and Japanese revisited: a quantitative approach to cross-linguistic comparison. In Gengo Jōhōgaku Kenkyū Hōkoku 13: Shizen kaiwa Bunseki e no gengo Shakai Shinrigakuteki Apurōchi, 263–76. Tokyo: Graduate School of Area and Culture Studies, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Yoshikazu. 1993. Nara jōkenbun no imi. In Nihongo no Jōken Hyōgen, ed. Masuoka, Takashi, 131–48. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, Helen. 1992. Autistic children’s talk about psychological states: deficits in the early acquisition of a theory of mind. Child Development 63: 161–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takeuchi, Toshio. 1982. Tōkai no Kotoba Chizu. Tokyo: Roppō Shuppansha.Google Scholar
Takubo, Yukinori, and Kinsui, Satoshi. 1997. Discourse management in terms of mental spaces. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 741–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamamura, Fumio. 1975. Goiron kara mita keiyōshi. Dōshisha Kokubungaku 10 (2): 87–104.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Akio. 1988. Tōkyōgo no jidai kubun. Kokugo to Kokubungaku 65: 1–16.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. That’s Not What I Meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. ed. 1993. Gender and Conversation Interaction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tansman, Alan. 1993. The Writings of Koda Aya: A Japanese Literary Daughter. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teramura, Hideo. 1982. Nihongo no Shintakusu to imi. Volume 1. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Teramura, Hideo. 1984. Nihongo no Shintakusu to imi. Volume 2. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959/1976. Éléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tojo, Misao. 1953. Josetsu. In Nihon Hōgengaku, ed. Tojo, Misao, 1–86. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan.Google Scholar
Tokashiki, Kyoko. 2006. Jidōshi shieki no joshi ni tsuite no ichi-kōsatsu. Papers in Teaching Japanese as a Foreign Language, Kansai Gaidai University 16: 47–60. .Google Scholar
Tokugawa, Munemasa. 1979. Bunken kokugoshi to hōgen. In Nihon no Hōgen Chizu, ed. Tokugawa, Munemasa, 141–200. Tokyo: Chūōkōronsha.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, Misato. 1986. Affective deixis in Japanese: a case study of directional verbs. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Tsujimura, Natsuko. 2007. An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tsukimoto, Masayuki. 1988. Heian jidai. In Nihongo Hyakka Daijiten, eds. Kindaichi, Haruhiko, Hayashi, Oki and Shibata, Takeshi, 73–82. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Tsukishima, Hiroshi. 1988. Nihongoshi no jidai kubun. In Nihongo Hyakka Daijiten, ed. Kindaichi, Haruhiko, Hayashi, Oki, and Shibata, Takeshi, 59–65. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Tsuzuku, Tsuneo. 1986. Bunpō gaisetsu. In Kōza Hōgengaku 1: Hōgen Gaisetsu, ed. Iitoyo, Kiichi, Hino, Sukezumi, and Sato, Ryoichi, 117–48. Tokyo: Tosho Kankōkai.Google Scholar
Uchida, Aki. 1992. When “difference” is “dominance”: a critique of the “anti-power-based” cultural approach to sex differences. Language in Society 21: 547–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Kazutoshi. 1895. Hyōjungo ni tsukite. Teikokubungaku 1 (1): 14–23.Google Scholar
Ueda, Kazutoshi. 1898. P on kō. Teikokubungaku 4 (1): 41–46.Google Scholar
Ueda, Makoto. 1970/1982. The Master Haiku Poet: Matsuo Bashō. Tokyo: Kōdansha International.Google Scholar
Usami, Mayumi 1995. Danwa-reberu kara mita keigo shiyō: supīchi reberu shifuto seiki no jōken to kinō. Gakuen 662: 27–42.Google Scholar
Uyeno, Tazuko. 1971. A study of Japanese modality: a performance analysis of sentence particles. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Vance, Timothy. 1987. An Introduction to Japanese Phonology. State University of New York.Google Scholar
Wada, Akemi. 1994. Kodai nihongo no Jodōshi no Kenkyū. Tokyo: Kazama Shobō.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watabe, Shintaro. 1995. Kokugo kokuji no Konpon Mondai. Osaka: Shinpū Shobō.Google Scholar
Watamaki, Toru. 1997. Jiheishōji ni okeru kyōkan kakutoku hyōgen joshi ‘ne’ no shiyō no ketsujo: jirei kenkyū. Hattatsu Shōgai Kenkyū 19: 146–57.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Minoru. 1997. Nihongoshi Yōsetsu. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard. 1992. Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: reconsidering claims for universality. In Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory, and Practice, ed. Watts, Richard, Ide, Sachiko, and Ehlich, Konrad, 43–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
West, Candace, and Zimmerman, Don. 1983. Small insults: a study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In Language, Gender, and Society, ed. Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris, and Henley, Nancy, 103–17. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
West, Candace, and Zimmerman, Don. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1: 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, Patricia. 1984. Uchi and soto (“in-group and out-group”): Social deixis in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1979/1988. The Japanese “adversative” passive in a typological context (Are grammatical categories vague or multiply polysemous?). In The Semantics of Grammar, 257–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1979. The conversational historical present alternation. Language 55: 168–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Akiho. 1988. Kamakura, Muromachi jidai. In Nihongo hyakka daijiten, ed. Kindaichi, Haruhiko, Hayashi, Oki, and Shibata, Takeshi, 83–92. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Yamashita, Kiyo. 1995. keiyōshisei setsubiji ‑poi ‑rashii ‑kusai ni tsuite. Kōza Nihongo Kyōiku 30: 183–206. .Google Scholar
Yanabu, Akira. 1982. Hon’yakugo Seiritsu Jijō. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Yanagita, Kunio. 1930. Kagyūkō. Tokyo: Tōkō Shoin.Google Scholar
Yasuda, Naomichi. 1988. Jōdai. In Nihongo Hyakka Daijiten, ed. Kindaichi, Haruhiko, Hayashi, Oki, and Shibata, Takeshi, 65–73. Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 2005. Language log: saying more with less. .

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Yoko Hasegawa, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Japanese
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507127.036
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Yoko Hasegawa, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Japanese
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507127.036
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Yoko Hasegawa, University of California, Berkeley
  • Book: Japanese
  • Online publication: 18 December 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507127.036
Available formats
×