Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7bb4899584-6pg97 Total loading time: 0.616 Render date: 2023-01-27T06:15:12.502Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

4 - Inclusion Without Power?

Limits of Participatory Institutions

from Part I - Extending Social Policy and Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2021

Diana Kapiszewski
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Steven Levitsky
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Deborah J. Yashar
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Early in the twenty-first century, Latin America became a center for experiments with participatory institutions. While many observers applauded the growing possibilities for building more inclusionary polities, there are limits to the degree of popular sector empowerment delivered by the new institutions, whether instigated by revived left parties, charismatic populists, or technocratic elites. To account for the varying trajectories and limitations of participatory institutions, this chapter looks for inclusion in the most likely cases, starting with the diffusion of a single institution, participatory budgeting, and continuing with an examination of the countries that advanced most in bringing several types of participatory institutions from parchment to practice at multiple levels of government – Brazil, Peru, Venezuela, and Uruguay. Even in these most likely cases, such institutions tended to offer access through low quality channels of participation that entailed consultation rather than effective decision-making, focused on issues or resources of lesser magnitude, restricted involvement to a limited public, or even reinforced clientelism in some cases.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, David. 2011. Direct Democracy Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andreucci, Diego, and Radhuber, Isabella. 2017. “Limits to ‘Counter-Neoliberal’ Reform: Mining Expansion and the Marginalization of Post-Extractivist Forces in Evo Morales’s Bolivia.” Geoforum 84: 280291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsel, Murat, Hogenboom, Barbara, and Pellegrini, Lorenzo. 2016. “The Extractive Imperative in Latin America.” The Extractive Industries and Society 3(4): 880887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2012. “Conferências Nacionais: Ampliando e Redefinindo os Padrões de Participação Social no Brasil.” IPEA Texto para discussão 1739. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2017. “Participation in Democratic Brazil: From Popular Hegemony and Innovation to Middle-Class Protest.” Opinião Pública 23(1): 4359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzellini, Dario. 2016. Communes and Workers’ Control in Venezuela: Building 21st Century Socialism from Below. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2015. “But Who Will Speak for the People? The Travel and Translation of Participatory Budgeting.” In Deliberation and Development: Rethinking the Role of Voice and Collective Action in Unequal Societies, edited by Heller, Patrick and Rao, Vijayendra, 107132. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2017. “A Century of Councils: Participatory Budgeting and the Long History of Participation in Brazil.” In Beyond Civil Society: Activism, Participation, and Protest in Latin America, edited by Alvarez, Sonia E., Rubin, Jeffrey W., Thayer, Millie, Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, and Laó-Montes, Agustín, 2744. Durham and London: Duke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, and Ganuza, Ernesto. 2017. Popular Democracy: The Paradox of Participation. Palo Alto: Stanford.Google Scholar
Balderacchi, Claudio. 2017. “Participatory Mechanisms in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela: Deepening or Undermining Democracy?Government & Opposition 52(1): 131161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidegain, Germán, and Tricot, Victor. 2017. “Political Opportunity Structure, Social Movements, and Malaise in Representation in Uruguay, 1985–2014.” In Malaise in Representation in Latin American Countries: Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay, edited by Joignant, Alfredo, Morales, Mauricio, and Fuentes, Claudio, 139160. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briceño, Héctor. 2014. “Los consejos comunales y la democracia participativa en Venezuela.” In Venezuela under Chavez’s Administration, edited by Sakaguchi, Aki, 144. Tokyo: IDE.Google Scholar
Cabannes, Yves, and Lipietz, Barbara. 2017. “Revisiting the Democratic Promise of Participatory Budgeting in Light of Competing Political, Good Governance and Technocratic Logics,” Environment & Urbanization, Online First, doi.org/10.1177/0956247817746279.Google Scholar
Cabrero Mendoza, Enrique, and Díaz Aldret, Ana. 2012. “La acción local en periferias urbanas marginadas de México ¿Nuevas o viejas institucionalidades?Gestión y Política Pública 21(Special Issue): 83129.Google Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell, and Sharpe, Kenneth. 2012. “Institutionalized Voice in Latin American Democracies.” In New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence, edited by Cameron, Maxwell, Hershberg, Eric, and Sharpe, Kenneth, 231250. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, Barry, and Kirby, Peadar. 2012. “Civil Society-State Relations in Left-Led Latin America: Deepening Democratization?” In Civil Society and the State in Left-Led Latin America: Challenges and Limitations to Democratization, edited by Cannon, and Kirby, , 189203. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassen, Bernard. 1998. “Participative Democracy in Porto Alegre.” Le Monde Diplomatique, October.Google Scholar
Castro, Fábio de, and Motta, Renata. 2015. “Environmental Politics under Dilma: Changing Relations between the Civil Society and the State.” LASAForum 46(3): 2527.Google Scholar
Ciccariello-Maher, George. 2016. Building the Commune: Radical Democracy in Venezuela. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
CNN. 2017. “¿Qué son los CLAP y cómo funcionan en Venezuela?” CNN Español, Sept. 5. http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2017/09/05/que-son-los-clap-y-como-funcionan-en-venezuela/ (accessed February 25, 2018).Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina, and Teixeira, Ana Cláudia. 2014. “The Participation of Civil Society in the Lula’s Government.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 6(3): 3966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina, Olvera, Alberto, and Panfichi, Aldo. 2006. “Para uma outra leitura da disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina.” In A disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina, edited by Dagnino, , Olvera, , and Panfichi, , 1391. São Paulo and Campinas: Paz e Terra and Unicamp.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
De la Torre, Carlos. 2017. “Populist Citizenship in the Bolivarian Revolutions.” Middle Atlantic Review of Latin American Studies 1(1): 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delamaza, Gonzalo. 2015. Enhancing Democracy: Public Policies and Citizen Participation in Chile. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Desenzi, Thiago. 2017. “Participação cidadã como imposição legal: reflexos da obrigatoriedade do orçamento participativo na região metropolitana de Lima, Peru.” Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Política (8)3: 112138.Google Scholar
Dias, Nelson, and Júlio, Simone. 2018. “The Next Thirty Years of Participatory Budgeting in the World Start Today.” In Hope for Democracy: 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide, edited by Dias, Nelson, 1532. Faro, Portugal: Oficina.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia, and Riofrancos, Thea. 2018. “Endogenous Participation: Strengthening Prior Consultation in Extractive Economies.” World Politics 70(1): 86121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farthing, Linda. 2019. “An Opportunity Squandered? Elites, Social Movements, and the Government of Evo Morales.” Latin American Perspectives 46(1): 212229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federación Iberoamericana del Ombudsman. 2018. “Recomendaciones para la incorporación del enfoque de empresas y derechos humanos en la gestión defensorial en contextos mineros, sobre la base de las experiencias institucionales de las Oficinas de Ombudsman de Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Perú y Portugal.” www.defensoria.gov.co/public/pdf/FIO-Mineria-DDHH.pdfGoogle Scholar
Flemmer, Ricarda, and Schilling-Vacaflor, Almut. 2016. “Unfulfilled Promises of the Consultation Approach: The Limits to Effective Indigenous Participation in Bolivia’s and Peru’s Extractive Industries.” Third World Quarterly 37(1): 172188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freigedo, Martín. 2015. “¿Por qué unos más y otros menos? Los incentivos para crear mecanismos de innovación democrática en los municipios uruguayos,” PhD thesis in Social Sciences, FLACSO Mexico.Google Scholar
Fuentes, Guillermo, Buschiazzo, Valentina, and Castillo, Marcelo. 2016. “¿Quiénes, cómo y para qué? Los espacios de participación convocados por el Ministerio de Desarrollo Social uruguayo.” Espiral, Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad XXIII (65): 89121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Guadilla, María. 2018. “The Incorporation of Popular Sectors and Social Movements in Venezuela Twenty-First Century Socialism.” In Reshaping the Political Arena in Latin America: From Resisting Neoliberalism to the Second Incorporation, edited by Silva, Eduardo and Rossi, Federico, 6077. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genro, Tarso, and de Souza, Ubiratan. 1997. Orçamento Participativo: A Experiência de Porto Alegre. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2011a. Deepening Local Democracy in Latin America: Participation, Decentralization, and the Left. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2011b. “The Left and Participatory Democracy: Brazil, Uruguay, and Venezuela.” In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, edited by Levitsky, Steve and Roberts, Kenneth, 162183. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2012. “The World Bank and the Globalization of Participatory Budgeting.” Journal of Public Deliberation 8(2), Article 7.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2017. “Participatory Budgeting in Latin American Cities.” In Urban Latin America: Inequalities and Neoliberal Reforms, edited by Angotti, Tom, 113128. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gómez Bruera, Hernán. 2015. “Participation Under Lula: Between Electoral Politics and Governability.” Latin American Politics & Society 57(2): 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Rebecca. 2018. “Deepening Distrust: Why Participatory Experiments Are Not Always Good for Democracy.” The Sociological Quarterly 59(1): 145167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Alisha, and Schneider, Ben Ross. 2017. “Easy and Hard Redistribution: The Political Economy of Welfare States in Latin America.” Perspectives on Politics 15(4): 9881006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iguíñiz, Javier. 2015. “Consensus Building and Its Incidence on Policy: The ‘National Agreement’ in Peru.” PUCP, Departamento de Economía, Documento de Trabajo 399.Google Scholar
Jara Reyes, René. 2012. “State-Civil Society Relations during Student Mobilizations in Chile in 2006 and 2011.” In Civil Society and the State in Left-Led Latin America, edited by Cannon, B. and Kirby, P., 94110. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Lalander, Rickard. 2014. “The Ecuadorian Resource Dilemma: Sumak Kawsay or Development?” Critical Sociology. DOI: 10.1177/0896920514557959. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalander, Rickard. 2016. “Ethnic Rights and the Dilemma of Extractive Development in Plurinational Bolivia.” International Journal of Human Rights 21(4): 464481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lander, Edgardo. 2016. “The Implosion of Venezuela’s Rentier State.” New Politics Papers #1. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
Latinobarómetro. 2015. “Informe 1995–2015.” Santiago: Corporación Latinobarómetro.Google Scholar
Lima, Valesca. 2020. Participatory Citizenship and Crisis in Contemporary Brazil. New Jersey: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissidini, Alicia. 2015. “Democracia directa en América Latina: avances, contradicciones y desafíos.” In Democracia participativa e izquierdas: logros, contradicciones, y desafíos, edited by Minnaert, Anja and Endara, Gustavo, 121189. Quito: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Lissidini, Alicia, Welp, Yanina, and Zovatto, Daniel, eds. 2014. Democracias en movimiento: mecanismos de democracia directa y participativa en América Latina. Mexico: UNAM.Google Scholar
McNeish, John-Andrew. 2017. “Extracting Justice? Colombia’s Commitment to Mining and Energy as a Foundation for Peace.” International Journal of Human Rights 21(4): 500516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie. 2013. “Participatory Democracy? Exploring Peru’s Efforts to Engage Civil Society in Local Governance.” Latin American Politics & Society 55(3): 6992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, Stephanie. 2019. Democracy from Above? The Unfulfilled Promise of Nationally Mandated Participatory Reforms. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 2012. “From Representative Democracy to Participatory Competitive Authoritarianism: Hugo Chávez and Venezuelan Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10(4): 955967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansuri, Ghazala, and Rao, Vijayendra. 2013. Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019. Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America: Reform Coalitions and Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Judy. 2013. Shifting Imaginaries of 'Good Citizens': Governing Citizens in 20th Century Peru. PhD thesis. Political Science. Carleton University.Google Scholar
Moncada, Eduardo. 2016. “Urban Violence, Political Economy, and Territorial Control: Insights from Medellín.” Latin American Research Review 51(4): 225248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noboa, Alejandro, and Bisio, Natalia. 2016. “La descentralización del Estado en América Latina: el caso uruguayo.” In Diálogo de saberes desde las Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contables, edited by Ziritt Trejo, Gertrudis, 105119. Sincelejo: CECAR.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Osmany Porto de. 2017. International Policy Diffusion and Participatory Budgeting: Ambassadors of Participation, International Institutions, and Transnational Networks. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olvera, Alberto. 2015. “Ciudadanía y participación ciudadana en México.” In Hacia una nación de ciudadanos, edited by Díaz, José Ramón Cossío and Florescano, Enrique, 232247. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica.Google Scholar
Ostiguy, Pierre, and Schneider, Aaron. 2018. “The Politics of Incorporation: Party Systems, Political Leaders and the State in Argentina and Brazil.” In Reshaping the Political Arena in Latin America: From Resisting Neoliberalism to the Second Incorporation, edited by Silva Eduardo, Eduardo and Rossi, Federico, 287320. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Panfichi, Aldo, and Luis Dammert, Juan. 2006. “Oportunidades e limitações da Participação Cidadã no Peru. A mesa de Concertação para a Luta Contra a Pobreza.” In A disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina, edited by Dagnino, Evelina, Olvera, Alberto, and Panfichi, Aldo, 229259. São Paulo and Campinas: Paz e Terra and Unicamp.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie, and Theodore, Nik. 2015. Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pires, Roberto. 2015. “The Midlife of Participatory Institutions in Brazil.” LASAForum 46(3): 2830.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy. 2016. “Comparing Deliberative Systems: An Assessment of 12 Countries in Latin America.” Paper prepared for presentation at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA), Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy. 2017a. “Democratic Innovation: Lessons from beyond the West.” In The Hertie School of Governance, The Governance Report 2017. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy. 2017b. LATINNO Dataset. Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy, and Samuels, David. 2014. “The Impact of Participatory Democracy: Evidence from Brazil’s National Public Policy Conferences.” Comparative Politics 46(3): 313332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy, and Tanscheit, Talita. 2017. “Moving Backwards: What Happened to Citizen Participation in Brazil?” Open Democracy. Nov. 30. www.opendemocracy.net/democraciaabierta/thamy-pogrebinschi-talita-tanscheit/moving-backwards-what-happened-to-citizen-part (accessed February 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Democracy and the Limits of Self-Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampf, David, and Chavarro, Diana. 2014. “The 1991 Colombian National Constituent Assembly: Turning Exclusion into Inclusion, or a Vain Endeavour?” Inclusive Political Settlements Paper 1. Berlin: Berghof Foundation.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew. 2015. “Participatory Populism: Theory and Evidence from Bolivarian Venezuela.” Political Research Quarterly 68(3): 415427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risley, Amy. 2015. Civil Society Organizations, Advocacy, and Policy Making in Latin American Democracies: Pathways to Participation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romão, Wagner de Melo. 2015. “Reflexões sobre as dificuldades da implementação da participação institucional no Brasil.” Idéias 6(2): 3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romão, Wagner de Melo, Gurza Lavalle, Adrián, and Zaremberg, Gisela. 2017. “Political Intermediation and Public Policy in Brazil: Councils and Conferences in the Policy Spheres of Health and Women’s Rights.” In Intermediation and Representation in Latin America: Actors and Roles Beyond Elections, edited by Zaremberg, G., Guarneros-Meza, V., and Gurza Lavalle, A., 3151. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruth, Saskia, Welp, Yanina, and Whitehead, Laurence, eds. 2017. Let the People Rule? Direct Democracy in the Twenty-First Century. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, and Avritzer, Leonardo. 2002. “Para ampliar o cânone democrático.” In Democratizar a democracia: os caminhos da democracia participativa, edited by Santos, , 3982. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
Schilling-Vacaflor, Almut, and Vollrath, David. 2012. “Contested Development: Comparing Indigenous and Peasant Participation in Resource Governance in Bolivia and Peru.” In Civil Society and the State in Left-Led Latin America, edited by Cannon, B. and Kirby, P., 126140. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Silva, Eduardo. 2017. “Reorganizing Popular Sector Incorporation: Propositions from Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela.” Politics & Society 45(1): 91122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintomer, Yves, Herzberg, Carsten, and Rocke, Anja. 2014. “Transnational Models of Citizen Participation: The Case of Participatory Budgeting.” In Hope for Democracy: 25 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide, edited by Dias, Nelson, 2844. São Brás de Alportel, Portugal: In Loco Association.Google Scholar
Tranjan, J. Ricardo. 2016. Participatory Democracy in Brazil: Socioeconomic and Political Origins. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
UN-Habitat. 2004. 72 Frequently Questions Asked about Participatory Budgeting. Urban Governance Toolkit Series. Quito: UN-Habitat.Google Scholar
Vargas Reina, Jenniffer. 2014. “Análisis comparativo de los diseños institucionales que regulan la participación de las víctimas en Colombia: antes y después de la Ley 1448 de 2012.” Estudios Socio-Jurídicos 16(1): 167207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecinday, Laura. 2017. “La orientación de la política social en el ciclo de recuperación “posneoliberal” en Uruguay (2005–2015).” Serviço Social & Sociedade, 129: 245264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, Alicia. 2017. “La Descentralización y el Presupuesto Participativo de Montevideo (2006–2016). Cambios en su diseño, la participación y los primeros resultados.” ALACIP Conference, Montevideo, July 26–28.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2015. Activating Democracy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, Jeffery, and Carr, Barry. 2013. “Introduction: The Latin American Left in Theory and Practice.” In The New Latin American Left: Cracks in the Empire, edited by Webber, and Carr, , 127. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Welp, Yanina. 2008. “La participación ciudadana en la encrucijada: los mecanismos de democracia directa en Ecuador, Perú y Argentina.” Íconos: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 40 (May): 117130.Google Scholar
Welp, Yanina. 2016a. “Recall Referendums in Peruvian Municipalities: a Political Weapon for Bad Losers or an Instrument of Accountability?Democratization 23(7): 11621179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welp, Yanina. 2016b. “El Referéndum ante la crisis de legitimidad.” In Partidos Políticos y Elecciones, edited by Soldevilla, Fernando Tuesta, 145159. Lima: JNE-PNUD-PUCP,.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1997. World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Wylde, Christopher. 2012. “State-Civil Society Relations in Post-Crisis Argentina.” In Civil Society and the State in Left-Led Latin America, edited by Cannon, B. and Kirby, P., 3447. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Zaremberg, Gisela, Gurza Lavalle, Adrián, and Guarneros-Meza, Valeria. 2017. “Introduction: Beyond Elections: Representation Circuits and Political Intermediation.” In Intermediation and Representation in Latin America: Actors and Roles Beyond Elections, edited by Zaremberg, , Guarneros-Meza, , and Lavalle, , 130. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaremberg, Gisela and Torres Wong, Marcela. 2018. “Participation on the Edge: Prior Consultation and Extractivism in Latin America.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 10(3): 2958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuazo, Moira. 2017. “Bolivia: ‘Social Control’ as the Fourth State Power 1994–2015.” In Intermediation and Representation in Latin America, edited by Zaremberg, , Guarneros-Mesa, , and Lavalle, , 95114. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×