Book contents
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Prepregnancy Problems
- Section 2 Early Prenatal Problems
- Section 3 Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems
- Section 4 Problems Associated with Infection
- Chapter 24 Hepatitis Virus Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 25 Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 26 Rubella, Measles, Mumps, Varicella, and Parvovirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 27 Cytomegalovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus, Adenovirus, Coxsackievirus, and Human Papillomavirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 28 Parasitic Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th June 2018)
- Chapter 29 Other Infectious Conditions in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Section 5 Late Pregnancy – Maternal Problems
- Section 6 Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems
- Section 7 Postnatal Problems
- Section 8 Normal Values
- Index
- References
Section 6 - Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2017
Book contents
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- High-Risk Pregnancy: Management Options
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Prepregnancy Problems
- Section 2 Early Prenatal Problems
- Section 3 Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems
- Section 4 Problems Associated with Infection
- Chapter 24 Hepatitis Virus Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 25 Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 23rd July 2019)
- Chapter 26 Rubella, Measles, Mumps, Varicella, and Parvovirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 27 Cytomegalovirus, Herpes Simplex Virus, Adenovirus, Coxsackievirus, and Human Papillomavirus in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Chapter 28 Parasitic Infections in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 15th June 2018)
- Chapter 29 Other Infectious Conditions in Pregnancy (Content last reviewed: 11th November 2020)
- Section 5 Late Pregnancy – Maternal Problems
- Section 6 Late Prenatal – Obstetric Problems
- Section 7 Postnatal Problems
- Section 8 Normal Values
- Index
- References
Summary
Abdominal pain during pregnancy presents unique clinical challenges, and the differential diagnoses are extensive.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- High-Risk PregnancyManagement Options, pp. 1523 - 1926Publisher: Cambridge University PressFirst published in: 2017
References
References
Torloni, MR, Vadmedorska, N, Merialdi, M, et al. Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 599–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chenn, MM, Coakley, FV, Kaimal, A, et al. Guidelines for computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 333–40.Google Scholar
Streffer, C, Shore, R, Konermann, G, et al. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2003; 33: 5–206.Google ScholarPubMed
Karam, PA. Determining and reporting fatal radiation exposure from diagnostic radiation. Health Phys 2000; 79 (Suppl 5): 585–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappell, MS, Colon, VJ, Sidhom, OA. A study of 10 medical centres of the safety and efficacy of 48 flexible sigmoidoscopies and 8 colonoscopies during pregnancy with follow-up of fetal outcome and with comparison to control groups. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41: 2353–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J, Price, R, Richardson, W, Fanelli, R. Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and use of laparoscopy for surgical problems during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3479–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reedy, MB, Galan, HL, Richards, WE, et al. Laparoscopy during pregnancy: a survey of laparoendoscopic surgeons. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 33–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Oelsner, G, Stockheim, D, Soriano, D, et al. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopy or laparotomy in pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 200–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rollins, MD, Chan, KJ, Price, RR. Laparoscopy for appendicitis and cholelithiasis during pregnancy: a new standard of care. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 237–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, CJ, Yen, CF, Lee, CL, Soong, YK. Minilaparoscopic cystectomy and appendectomy in late second trimester. JSLS 2002; 6: 373–5.Google ScholarPubMed
McKellar, DP, Anderson, CT, Boynton, CJ, Peoples, JB. Cholecystectomy during pregnancy without fetal loss. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 174: 465–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Casele, HL. The use of unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparins in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006; 49: 895–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachman, E, Schienfield, A, Voss, E, et al. Pregnancy and laparoscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6: 347–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fatum, M, Rojanshy, N. Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001; 56: 50–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fardiazar, Z, Derakhshan, I, Torab, R, Vahedi, A, Goldust, M. Maternal-neonatal outcome in pregnancies with non-obstetric laparotomy during pregnancy. Pak J Biol Sci 2014; 17: 260–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, A, Pearl, M. Mini-laparotomy versus laparoscopy for gynecologic conditions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21: 109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, JG. Uterine torsion in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992; 71: 260–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salani, R, Theiler, RN, Lindsay, M. Uterine torsion and fetal bradycardia associated with external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 820–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Setchell, M. Abdominal pain in pregnancy. In Studd, J (ed.), Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 6. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987, pp. 89–99.Google Scholar
Yoneyama, K, Kimura, A, Kogo, M, et al. Clinical predictive factors for preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labour or preterm premature ruptured membranes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49: 16–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, CM, O’Neill, LM. Use of pelvic tilt exercise for ligament pain relief. J Nurse Midwifery 1994; 39: 370–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dowswell, T, Neilson, JP. Interventions for heartburn in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (4): CD007065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, SK, O’Brien, L, Koren, G. The safety of histamine 2 (H2) blockers in pregnancy: A meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1835–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trash, HK, Friede, A, Hogue, CJ. Abdominal pregnancy in the United States: frequency and maternal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 333–6.Google Scholar
Aliyu, LD, Ashimi, AO. A multicenter study of advanced abdominal pregnancy: a review of six cases in low resource settings. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 33–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nkusu Nunyalulendho, D, Einterz, EM. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: case report and review of 163 cases reported since 1946. Rural Remote Health 2008; 8: 1087–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Worley, KC, Hnat, MD, Cunningham, FG. Advanced extrauterine pregnancy: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 297–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, K, Song, L, Wang, L, et al. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: an increasingly challenging clinical concern for obstetricians. Int J Clin Pathol 2014; 7: 5461–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Sunday-Adeoye, I, Twoney, D, Egwuatu, EV, Okonta, PI. A 30 year review of advanced abdominal pregnancy at the Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Afikpo, south eastern Nigeria (1976–2006). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283: 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetinkaya, MB, Kokcu, A, Alper, T. Follow up of the regression of the placenta left in situ in an advanced abdominal pregnancy using the Cavaleiri method. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2005; 31: 22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B, Nielson, TF. Appendicitis in pregnancy: diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 78: 758–62.Google Scholar
Andersson, RE, Lambe, M. Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1281–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, PL, Keller, JJ, Liang, HH, Lin, HC. Acute appendicitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1204–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehnert, BE, Gross, JA, Linnau, KF, Moshiri, M. Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Emerg Radiol 2012; 19: 293–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel, GM, Malguria, N, McCarthy, S, Copel, J, Weinreb, J. MRI vs. ultrasound for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 428–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coursey, CA, Nelson, RC, Patel, MB. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology 2009; 254: 460–8.Google Scholar
Basaran, A, Basaran, M. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009; 64: 481–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedrosa, I, Lafornara, M, Pandharipande, PV, et al. Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 2009; 250: 749–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corneille, MG, Gallup, TM, Bening, T, et al. The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 2010; 200: 363–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang Y, , Zhao, YY, Qiao, J, Ye, RH. Diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy and perinatal outcome in the late pregnancy. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122: 521–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Eom, JM, Hong, JH, Jeon, SW, et al. Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Pregnant Women with Acute Appendicitis. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2012; 41: 82–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Chung, JC, Cho, GS, Shin, EJ, Kim, HC, Song, OP. Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in pregnant women. Can J Surg 2013; 56: 341–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, HG, Samaraee, AA, Mills, SJ, Kalbassi, MR. Laparoscopic appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review of the published evidence. Int J Surg 2014; 12: 1235–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, H, Granger, S, Price, R, et al. Diagnosis and laparoscopic treatment of surgical diseases during pregnancy: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1917–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, CA1, Tang, T, Walsh, SR. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review. Int J Surg 2008; 6: 339–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerson, S, Holtz, T, Ehringreis, M, et al. Small bowel obstruction in pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 299–302.Google ScholarPubMed
Rawlings, C. Management of postcaesarian Ogilvie’s syndrome and their subsequent outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 50: 573–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CW, Beresford, SA, Schulte, SJ, Matsumoto, AM. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors for biliary sludge and stones during pregnancy. Hepatology 2005; 41: 359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, CW. Risk factors for gallstone-related hospitalization during pregnancy and the postpartum. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2263–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sang, SJ, Mayo, ML, Rodriguez-Frias, E, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:453–61.Google Scholar
Othman, MO, Stone, E, Hashimi, M, Parasher, G. Conservative management of cholelithiasis and its complications in pregnancy is associated with recurrent symptoms and more emergency department visits. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 564–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Fan, C, Wang, S. Clinical analysis of 16 patients with acute pancreatitisin the third trimester of pregnancy Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2013; 6: 1696–701.Google ScholarPubMed
Kayatas, SE, Eser, M, Cam, C, Cogendez, E, Guzin, K. Acute pancreatitis associated with hypertriglyceridemia: a life-threatening complication. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 281: 427–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, SS, Lin, XZ, Tsai, YT, et al. Clinical significance of ultrasonography, computed tomography, and biochemical testsin the rapid diagnosis of gallstone-related pancreatitis: a prospective study. Pancreas 1988; 3: 153–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, SJ, Mayo, MJ, Rodriguez-Frias, E, et al. Safety and utility of ERCP during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 453–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, A, Petrov, MS, Brooks, DC, et al. Acute pancreatitis and pregnancy: a 10-year single center experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 1623–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Date, RS, Kaushal, M, Ramesh, A. A review of the management of gallstone disease and its complications in pregnancy. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 599–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crisan, LS, Steidl, ET, Rivera-Alsina, ME. Acute hyperlipidemic pancreatitis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: e9.Google Scholar
Eddy, JJ, Gideonsen, MD, Song, JY, et al. Pancreatitis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 1075–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandey, R, Jacob, A, Brooks, H. Acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: review of three cases and anaesthetic management. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21: 360–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClave, SA. Nutrition support in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2007; 36:65–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithson, A, Ruiz, J, Perello, R, et al. Diagnostic and management of spontaneous rectus sheath hematoma. Eur J Intern Med 2013; 24: 579–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasotakis, G. Retroperitoneal and rectus sheath hematomas. Surg Clin North Am 2014; 94: 71–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapelle, CF, Schutte, JM, Schuitemaker, NW, Steegers, EAP, van Roosmalen, J. Maternal mortality attributable to vascular dissection and rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide confidential enquiry BJOG 2012; 119: 86–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aubrey-Bassler, FK, Sowers, N. 613 cases of splenic rupture without risk factors or previously diagnosed disease: a systematic review. BMC Emerg Med 2012; 12: 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, PN, Madeley, RJ, Symonds, EM. Abdominal pain of unknown aetiology in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 688–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Glanc, P, Brofman, N, Salem, S, et al. The prevalence of incidental simple ovarian cysts ≥ 3 cm detected by transvaginal sonography in early pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007; 29: 502–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Sergent, F, Verspyck, E, Marpeau, L. [Management of an ovarian cyst during pregnancy]. Presse Med 2003; 32: 1039–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Zanetta, G, Mariani, E, Lissoni, A, et al. A prospective study of the role of ultrasound in the management of adnexal masses in pregnancy. BJOG 2003; 110: 578–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, KY, Johnson, JL, Kay, HH. Simple ovarian cysts: clinical features on a first-trimester ultrasound scan. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 440–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Goffinet, F. [Ovarian cysts and pregnancy]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2001; 30 (1 Suppl): S100–8.Google Scholar
Yen, CF, Lin, SL, Murk, W, et al. Risk analysis of torsion and malignancy for adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1895–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szecsi, PB, Andersen, MR, Bjørngaard, B, Hedengran, KK, Stender, S. Cancer antigen 125 after delivery in women with a normal pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 1295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derchi, LE, Serafini, G, Gandolfo, N, Gandolfo, NG, Martinoli, C. Ultrasound in gynecology. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 2137–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherard, GB, Hodson, CA, Williams, HJ, et al. Adnexal masses and pregnancy: a 12-year experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 358–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usui, R, Minakami, H, Kosuge, S, et al. A retrospective survey of clinical, pathologic, and prognostic features of adnexal masses operated on during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2000; 26: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, LM, Connors-Beatty, DJ, Nowak, A, Tush, B. The role of ultrasonography in the detection and management of adnexal masses during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 703–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, SB, Oelsner, G, Seidman, DS, et al. Laparoscopic detorsion allows sparing of the twisted ischemic adnexa. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1999; 6: 139–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuen, PM, Chang, AM. Laparoscopic management of adnexal mass during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 173–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balci, O, Gezginc, K, Karatayli, R, et al. Management and outcomes of adnexal masses during pregnancy: a 6-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34: 524–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspi, B, Ben-Arie, A, Appelman, Z, Or, Y, Hagay, Z. Aspiration of simple pelvic cysts during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000; 49: 102–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glanc, P, Salem, S, Farine, D. Adnexal masses in the pregnant patient: a diagnostic and management challenge. Ultrasound Q 2008; 24: 225–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, H, Yoshida, A, Kobayashi, M, Yamada, T. Changes in size of the functional cyst on ultrasonography during early pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 1997; 14: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, JP, Kay, HH, Mahony, BS. The clinical significance of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1212–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobelt, N, Ghidini, A, Cavallone, M, et al. Natural history of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laughlin, SK, Baird, DD, Savitz, DA, Herring, AH, Hartmann, KE. Prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in the first trimester of pregnancy: an ultrasound-screening study. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 630–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qidwai, GI, Caughey, AB, Jacoby, AF. Obstetric outcomes in women with sonographically identified uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 376–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winer-Muram, HT, Muram, D, Gillieson, MS. Uterine myomas in pregnancy. J Can Assoc Radiol 1984; 35: 168–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Rosati, P, Exacoustos, C, Mancuso, S. Longitudinal evaluation of uterine myoma growth during pregnancy. A sonographic study. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 511–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aharoni, A, Reiter, A, Golan, D, Paltiely, Y, Sharf, M. Patterns of growth of uterine leiomyomas during pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 510–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatsky, PC, Tran, ND, Caughey, AB, Fujimoto, VY. Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 357–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, SJ, Best, S, Kumar, S. The impact of fibroid characteristics on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 395.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coronado, GD, Marshall, LM, Schwartz, SM. Complications in pregnancy, labor, and delivery with uterine leiomyomas: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 764–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Exacoustos, C, Rosati, P. Ultrasound diagnosis of uterine myomas and complications in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 97–101.Google ScholarPubMed
Vergani, P, Ghidini, A, Strobelt, N, et al. Do uterine leiomyomas influence pregnancy outcome? Am J Perinatol 1994; 11: 356–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritts, EA, Parker, WH, Olive, DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 1215–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carranza-Mamane, B, Havelock, J, Hemmings, R, et al. The management of uterine fibroids in women with otherwise unexplained infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2015; 37: 277–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chittawar, PW, Franik, S, Pouwer, AW, Farquhar, C. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10): CD004638.Google Scholar
Roberts, WE, Fulp, KS, Morrison, JC, Martin, JN. The impact of leiomyomas on pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 39: 43–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narayan, R, Rajat, , Goswamy, K. Treatment of submucous fibroids, and outcome of assisted conception. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994; 1: 307–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koike, T, Minakami, H, Kosuge, S, et al. Uterine leiomyoma in pregnancy: its influence on obstetric performance. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1999; 25: 309–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celik, C, Acar, A, Ciçek, N, Gezginc, K, Akyürek, C. Can myomectomy be performed during pregnancy? Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002; 53: 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonito, M, Gulemì, L, Basili, R, Roselli, D. Myomectomy during the first and second trimester of pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2007; 34: 149–50.Google ScholarPubMed
De Carolis, S, Fatigante, G, Ferrazzani, S, et al. Uterine myomectomy in pregnant women. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001; 16: 116–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittich, AC, Salminen, ER, Yancey, MK, Markenson, GR. Myomectomy during early pregnancy. Mil Med 2000; 165: 162–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mollica, G, Pittini, L, Minganti, E, Perri, G, Pansini, F. Elective uterine myomectomy in pregnant women. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1996; 23: 168–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Phelan, JP. Myomas and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995; 22: 801–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, CE. Myomectomy: comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000; 27: 407–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgakopoulos, PA, Bersis, G. Sigmoido-uterine rupture in pregnancy after multiple myomectomy. Int Surg 1981; 66: 367–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, AB, Chamberlain, R, Te Linde, RW. Myomectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1956; 71: 759–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nezhat, C. The “cons” of laparoscopic myomectomy in women who may reproduce in the future. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1996; 41: 280–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Matsunaga, JS, Daly, CB, Bochner, CJ, Agnew, CL. Repair of uterine dehiscence with continuation of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1211–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubuisso, JB, Fauconnier, A, Babaki-Fard, K, Chapron, C. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view. Hum Reprod Update 2000; 6: 588–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Tian, YC, Long, TF, Dai, YM. Pregnancy outcomes following different surgical approaches of myomectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41: 350–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Serehi, A, Mhoyan, A, Brown, M, et al. Placenta accreta: an association with fibroids and Asherman syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 1623–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, J, Bunting, L, Collins, JA, Nygren, KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 1506–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupas, C, Christin-Maitre, S. [What are the factors affecting fertility in 2008?] Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 2008; 69 (Suppl 1): S57–61.Google Scholar
Snick, HK, Snick, TS, Evers, JL, Collins, JA. The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1582–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigorescu, V, Zhang, Y, Kissin, DM, et al. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology by infertility diagnosis: ovulatory dysfunction versus tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 1019–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandey, S, Shetty, A, Hamilton, M, Bhattacharya, S, Maheshwari, A. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18: 485–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ziadeh, SM, Zakaria, MR, Abu-Hieja, A. Pregnancy rates using CC/hMG or hMG alone. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 1997; 23: 97–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elchalal, U, Schenker, JG. The pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: views and ideas. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1129–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delvigne, A, Rozenberg, S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update 2002; 8: 559–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schieve, LA, Tatham, L, Peterson, HB, Toner, J, Jeng, G. Spontaneous abortion among pregnancies conceived using assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 959–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Devroey, P, Van Steirteghem, A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clayton, HB, Schieve, LA, Peterson, HB, et al. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 595–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, KM, Boulet, SL, Kissin, DM, Jamieson, DJ; National ART Surveillance (NASS) Group. Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001–2011. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 70–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adamson, GD, de Mouzon, J, Lancaster, P, et al. World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 1586–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Mouzon, J, Goossens, V, Bhattacharya, S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1851–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, J, Wang, H, Sheng, X, et al. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril 2015; 103: 1492–508.e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunby, J, Bissonnette, F, Librach, C, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2006 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 2189–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Peperstraten, AM, Hermens, RP, Nelen, WL, et al. Perceived barriers to elective single embryo transfer among IVF professionals: a national survey. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2718–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Allen, C, Bowdin, S, Harrison, RF, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study. Ir J Med Sci 2008; 177: 233–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, RA, Gibson, KA, Wu, YW, Croughan, MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 551–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caserta, D, Marci, R, Tatone, C, et al. IVF pregnancies: neonatal outcomes after the new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (law 40/2004). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008; 87: 935–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malchau, SS, Loft, A, Henningsen, AK, Nyboe Andersen, A, Pinborg, A. Perinatal outcomes in 6,338 singletons born after intrauterine insemination in Denmark, 2007 to 2012: the influence of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 1110–16.e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hvidtjørn, D, Schieve, L, Schendel, D, et al. Cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorders, and developmental delay in children born after assisted conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163: 72–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallen, B. The risk of neurodisability and other long-term outcomes for infants born following ART. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 19: 239–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romundstad, LB, Romundstad, PR, Sunde, A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI: a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2353–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kashyap, S, Claman, P. Polycystic ovary disease and the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Reprod Med 2000; 45: 991–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Kuliev, A, Verlinsky, Y. The role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in women of advanced reproductive age. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 15: 233–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbett, S, Shmorgun, D, Claman, P, et al. The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014; 36: 1024–36.Google ScholarPubMed
Ankum, WM, Mol, BW, Van der Veen, F, Bossuyt, PM. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 1093–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, CA, Ungerer, JA, Beaurepaire, J, Tennant, C, Saunders, D. Anxiety during pregnancy and fetal attachment after in-vitro fertilization conception. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 176–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, DA, Newnham, JP, Bower, C, Hart, R. Implications of polycystic ovary syndrome for pregnancy and for the health of offspring. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1397–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElhaney, RD, Ringer, M, DeHart, DJ, Vasilenko, P. Rubella immunity in a cohort of pregnant women. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20: 64–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urman, B, Sarac, E, Dogan, L, Gurgan, T. Pregnancy in infertile PCOD patients. Complications and outcome. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 501–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Rackow, BW, Arici, A. Reproductive performance of women with Mullerian anomalies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 229–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syed, I, Hussain, HK, Weadock, W, Ellis, J. Imaging in Mullerian duct abnormalities. Medscape. Updated: Feb 28, 2016. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/405335-overview (accessed March 2017).Google Scholar
Golan, A, Langer, R, Neuman, M, et al. Obstetric outcome in women with congenital uterine malformations. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 233–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, PK. Pregnancies in women with uterine malformation, treated obstruction of hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287: 975–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfirevic, Z, Stampalija, T, Roberts, D, Jorgensen, AL. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (4): CD008991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iams, JD. Prevention of preterm parturition. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1861.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, PK. Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997; 4: 311–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leiman, G, Harrison, NA, Rubin, A. Pregnancy following conization of the cervix: complications related to cone size. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 136: 14–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinborg, A, Ortoft, G, Loft, A, Rasmussen, SC, Ingerslev, HJ. Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehsanipoor, RM, Jolley, JA, Goldshore, MA, et al. The relationship between previous treatment for cervical dysplasia and preterm delivery in twin gestations. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27: 821–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, JR, Seman, EI. Pregnancy following endometrial ablation: case history and literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003; 58: 551–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, I, Das, M, Fernandez, H, Deffieux, X. Pregnancy after endometrial ablation: a report of three cases. J Reprod Med 2013; 58: 173–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Yin, CS. Pregnancy after hysteroscopic endometrial ablation without endometrial preparation: a report of five cases and a literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 49: 311–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
McShane, PM, Heye, PS, Epstein, ME. Maternal and perinatal mortality resulting from placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 176–82.
Oyelese, Y, Ananth, CV. Placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1005–16.
Ananth, CV, Demissie, K, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998. A comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 275–81.
Fan, D, Wu, S, Liu, L, et al. Prevalence of antepartum hemorrhage in women with placenta previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 40320. htps://doi.org/10.1038/srep40320.
Crane, JM, Van den Hof, MC, Dodds, L, Armson, BA, Liston, R. Maternal complications with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol. 2000; 17: 101–5.
Crane, JM, Van den Hof, MC, Dods, L, Armson, BA, Liston, R. Neonatal outcomes with placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210–14.
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM.The effects of placenta previa on neonatal mortality: a population based study in the United States, 1989 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1299–304.
Faiz, AS, Ananth, CV. Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa. An overview and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13: 175–90.
Romundstad, LB, Romundstad, PR, Sunde, A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI: a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2353–8.
Naeye, RL. Abruptio placentae and placenta previa: frequency, perinatal mortality, and cigarette smoking. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 701–4.
Hibbard, BM. Bleeding in late pregnancy. In Hibbard, BM (ed.), Principles of Obstetrics. London: Butterworths, 1988, pp. 96–104.
Hershkowitz, R, Fraser, D, Mazor, M, Leiberman, JR. One or more multiple previous cesarean sections are associated with similar increased frequency of placenta previa. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1995; 62: 185–8.
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. The association of placenta praevia with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1071–8.
Knight, M, Bunch, K, Tuffnell, D, et al. (eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2015–17. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2019.
Cotton, DB, Read, JA, Paul, RH, Quilligan, EJ. The conservative aggressive management of placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 687–95.
Drife, J, Lewis, G (eds). Why Mothers Die: A Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 2000–2002. London: Stationery Office, 2004.
Naeye, ER. Placenta previa: predisposing factors and effects on the fetus and the surviving infants. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 521–5.
Papinniemi, M, Keski-Nisula, L, Heinonen, S. Placental ratio and risk of velamentous umbilical cord insertion are increased in women with placenta previa. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24: 353–7.
Varma, TR. Fetal growth and placental function in patients with placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 80: 311–15.
Taipale, P, Hiilesmaa, V, Ylostalo, P. Diagnosis of placenta previa by transvaginal sonographic screening at 12–16 weeks in a non-selected population. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 364–7.
Konje, JC, Ewings, PD, Adewunmi, OA, et al. The outcome of pregnancies complicated by threatened abortion. J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 12: 150–5.
Newton, ER, Barss, V, Cetrulo, CL. The epidemiology and clinical history of asymptomatic mid-trimester placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 743–8.
Chapman, MG, Furness, ET, Jones, WR, Sheat, JH. Significance of the location of placenta site in early pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 86: 846–8.
McClure, N, Dornan, JC. Early identification of placenta previa. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 959–61.
Laing, FC. Placenta previa: avoiding false-negative diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9: 109–13.
Comeau, J, Shaw, L, Marcell, CC, Lavery, JP. Early placenta previa and delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 577–80.
Ruparelia, BA, Chapman, MG. Early low-lying placenta ultrasonic assessment, progress and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1985; 20: 209–13.
Oppenheimer, L; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007; 29: 261–73.
Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Ramus, RM, et al. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 692–7.
Tan, NH, Abu, M, Woo, JLS, Tahir, HM. The role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of placental previa. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 35: 42–5.
Knuppel, AR, Drukker, JE. Bleeding in late pregnancy: antepartum bleeding. In Hayashi, RH, Castillo, MS (eds), High Risk Pregnancy: A Team Approach. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1986, pp. 547–80.
Heer, IM, Muller-Egloff, S, Strauss, A. Placenta previa: comparison of four sonographic modalities. Ultraschall Med 2006; 27: 355–9.
Simon, EG, Fouche, CJ, Perrotin, F. Three-dimensional transvaginal sonography in third-trimester evaluation of placenta previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 465–8.
Bonner, SM, Haynes, SR, Ryall, D. The anesthetic management of cesarean section for placenta previa: a questionnaire survey. Anesthesia 1995; 50: 992–4.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management. Green-top Guideline No. 27a. London: RCOG, 2018. www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg27a (accessed February 2020).
Ghourab, S. Third trimester transvaginal ultrasonography in placenta previa: does the shape of the lower placental edge predict clinical outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 103–8.
Neilson, JP. Interventions for suspected placenta previa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (2): CD001998.
Love, CDB, Wallace, EM. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa: what is appropriate management? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 864–7.
Crenshaw, C, Jones, DED, Parker, RT. Placenta previa: a survey of 20 years experience with improved perinatal survival by expectant therapy and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1973; 28: 461–70.
Brenner, WE, Edelman, DA, Hendricks, CH. Characteristics of patients with placenta previa and results of “expectant management”. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 132: 180–91.
Besinger, RE, Moniak, CW, Paskiewicz, LS, Fisher, SG, Tomich, PG. The effect of tocolytic use in the management of symptomatic placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1770–5.
Sharma, A, Suri, V, Gupta, I. Tocolytic therapy in conservative management of symptomatic placenta previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84: 109–13.
Vintzileos, AM, Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC. Using ultrasound in the clinical management of placental implantation abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: S70–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.059.
Silver, RM. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: 654–68. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001005.
Balayla, J, Wo, BL, Bedard, MJ. A late-preterm, early-term stratified analysis of neonatal outcomes by gestational age in placenta previa: defining the optimal timing for delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 1756–61.
Hong, J, Jee, Y, Yoon, H, Kim, S. Comparison of general and epidural anesthesia in elective cesarean section for placenta previa totalis: maternal hemodynamics, blood loss and neonatal outcome. Int J Obstet Anesth 2003; 12: 12–16.
Yamada, T, Mori, H, Ueki, M. Autologous blood transfusion in patients with placenta previa. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 255–9.
Scott, JS. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Whitefield, CR (ed.), Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology for Postgraduates, 4th edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986, pp. 412–17.
Myerscough, PR (ed.). Munro Kerr’s Operative Obstetrics, 10th edn. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1982.
Williamson, HC, Greeley, AV. Management of placenta previa: 12 year study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1945; 50: 987–91.
Zaki, ZM, Bahar, AM. Massive haemorrhage due to placenta praevia accreta: a useful role for vasopressin. J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 17: 486–7.
Kato, S, Tanabe, A, Kanki, K, et al. Local injection of vasopressin reduces the blood loss during cesarean section in placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 1249–56.
Miller, DA, Chollet, JA, Goodwin, TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa–placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 210–14.
Clark, SL, Koonings, PP, Phelan, JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 89–92.
Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, et al.; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1226–32.
Knight, M, Nair, M, Tuffnell, D, et al.; MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care: Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013–15. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2017.
Ananth, CV, Lavery, JA, Vintzileos, AM, et al. Severe placental abruption: clinical definition and associations with maternal complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 272.e1–e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.069.
Rasmussen, S, Irgrens, KM, Dalaker, K. The occurrence of placental abruption in Norway 1967–1991. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 222–8.
Fox, H (ed.). Pathology of the Placenta. London: Saunders, 1978.
Fraser, R, Watson, R. Bleeding during the latter half of pregnancy. In Chalmers, I (ed.), Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. London: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 89–92.
Sher, G, Statland, BE. Abruptio placentae with coagulopathy: a rational basis for management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985; 28: 15–23.
Pritchard, JA, Brekken, AL. Clinical and laboratory studies on severe abruption placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1967; 97: 681–700.
Rasmussen, S, Irgrens, KM, Dalaker, K. The effect on the likelihood of further pregnancy of placental abruption and the rate of its recurrence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1292–5.
Paterson, MEL. The aetiology and outcome of abruptio placentae. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1979; 58: 31–5.
Kramer, MS, Usher, RH, Pollack, R, et al. Etiologic determinants of abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 221–6.
Ananth, CV, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Incidence of placental abruption in relation to cigarette smoking and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 622–8.
Lehtovirta, P, Forss, M. The acute effect of smoking on intervillous blood flow of the placenta. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1978; 85: 729–37.
Scott, JS. Placenta extrachoralis (placenta marginata and placenta circumvallata). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1960; 67: 904–18.
Wilson, D, Paalman, RJ. Clinical significance of circumvallate placenta. Obstet Gynecol 1967; 29: 774–8.
Crosby, WM, Costila, JP. Safety of lap-belt restraint for pregnant victims of automobile collisions. N Engl J Med 1971; 284: 632–5.
Egley, C, Cefalo, R. Abruptio placentae. In Studd, J (ed.), Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 5. London, Churchill Livingstone,1985, pp. 108–20.
Yaron, Y, Cherry, M, Kramer, RL, et al. Second trimester maternal serum marker screening: maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, betahuman chorionic gonadotrophin, estriol, and their various combinations as predictors of pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 968–74.
Abdella, TN, Sibai, BM, Hays, JM, Anderson, GD. Relationship of hypertensive diseases to abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 365–70.
Ananth, CV, Savitz, DA, Williams, MA. Placental abruption and its association with hypertension and prolonged rupture of membranes: a methodologic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 309–18.
Golditch, IA, Boyce, NE. Management of abruptio placentae. JAMA 1970; 212: 288–93.
De Valera, E. Abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968; 100: 599–606.
De Vries, JI, Dekker, GA, Huijgens, PC, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and protein S deficiency in complicated pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1248–54.
Kupferminc, MJ, Eldor, A, Steinman, N, et al. Increased frequency of genetic thrombophilia in women with complications of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 9–13.
Zdoukopoulos, N, Zintzaras, E. Genetic risk factors for placental abruption: a HuGE review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2008; 19: 309–323.
Pariente, G, Wiznitzer, A, Sergienko, R, Mazor, M, Holcberg, G, Sheiner, E. Placental abruption: critical analysis of risk factors and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 24: 698–702.
Kennare, R, Heard, A, Chan, A. Substance use during pregnancy: risk factors and obstetric and perinatal outcomes in South Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 45: 220–5.
Ananth, CV, Wilcox, AJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153: 332–7.
Tikkanen, M, Luukkaala, T, Gissler, M, et al. Decreasing perinatal mortality in placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92: 298–305.
Ananth, CV, VanderWeele, TJ. Placental abruption and perinatal mortality with preterm delivery as a mediator: disentangling direct and indirect effects. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174: 99–108.
Aliyu, MH, Salihu, HM, Lynch, O, et al. Placental abruption, offspring sex, and birth outcomes in a large cohort of mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 248–52.
Tikkanen, M. Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 140–9.
Ananth, CV, Berkowitz, GS, Savitz, DA, Lapinski, RH. Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA 1999; 282: 1646–51.
Sheiner, E, Shoham-Vardi, I, Hadar, A, et al. Incidence, obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome of preterm placental abruption: a retrospective analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002; 11: 34–9.
Lunan, CB. The management of abruptio placentae. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw 1973; 80: 120–4.
Gibbs, JM, Weindling, AM. Neonatal intracranial lesions following placental abruption. Eur J Pediatr 1994; 153: 195–7.
Niswander, KR, Friedman, EA, Hoover, DB, et al. Fetal morbidity following potentially atoxigenic obstetric conditions: I. Abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 95: 838–45.
Glantz, C, Purnell, L. Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 837–40.
Roberts, G. Unclassified antepartum haemorrhage: incidence and perinatal mortality in a community. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1970; 77: 492–5.
Hurd, WW, Miodovnik, M, Lavin, JP. Selective management of abruption placentae: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61: 467–73.
Notelovitz, M, Bottoms, SF, Dase, DF, Leichter, PJ. Painless abruptio placentae. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 270–2.
Page, EW, King, EB, Merril, JA. Abruptio placentae: dangers of delayed delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1954; 3: 385–93.
Green-Thompson, RW. Antepartum haemorrhage. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1982; 9: 479–515.
Nyberg, DA, Cyr, DR, Mack, LA, Wilson, DA, Shuman, WP. Sonographic spectrum of placental abruption. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148: 161–7.
Rivera-Alxima, ME, Saldana, LR, Maklad, N, Korp, S. The use of ultrasound in the expectant management of abruptio placentae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 924–7.
Barron, SL. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Chamberlain, G, Turnbull, A (eds), Obstetrics. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1989, pp. 176–88.
Okonofua, FE, Olatubosun, OA. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery in abruptio placentae associated with live fetuses. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1985; 23: 471–4.
Besinger, RE, Niebyl, JR. The safety and efficacy of tocolytics agents for the treatment of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1990; 45: 415–40.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Tocolytic Drugs for Women in Preterm Labour. Green-top Guideline No. 1b. London: RCOG, 2011.
Towers, CV, Pircon, RA, Heppard, M. Is tocolysis safe in the management of third-trimester bleeding? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: 1572–8.
Colón, I, Berletti, M, Garabedian, MJ, et al. Randomized, double-blinded trial of magnesium sulfate tocolysis versus intravenous normal saline for preterm nonsevere placental abruption. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33: 696–702. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571324.
Ruiter, L, Ravelli, AC, de Graaf, IM, Mol, BW, Pajkrt, E. Incidence and recurrence rate of placental abruption: a longitudinal linked national cohort study in the Netherlands. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 573.e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.019.
Roberge, S, Bujold, E, Nicolaides, KH. Meta-analysis on the effect of aspirin use for prevention of preeclampsia on placental abruption and antepartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 483–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.238.
Kim, YA. Makar, RS. Detection of fetomaternal hemorrhage. Am J Hematol 2012; 87: 417–23.
Oyelese, KO, Turner, M, Lees, C, Campbell, S. Vasa previa: an avoidable obstetric tragedy. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 18: 109–15.
Baulies, S, Maiz, N, Muñoz, A, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of vasa previa and analysis of risk factors. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27: 595–9.
Englert, Y, Imbert, MC, Van Rosendael, E, et al. Morphological anomalies in the placentae of IVF pregnancies: preliminary report of a multicentric study. Hum Reprod 1987; 2: 155–7.
Jauniaux, E, Englert, Y, Vanesse, M, et al. Pathologic features of placentas from singleton pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 61–4.
Lee, W, Lee, VL, Kirk, JS, et al. Vasa previa: prenatal diagnosis, natural evolution, and clinical outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 572–6.
Rebarber, A, Dolin, C, Fox, NS, et al. Natural history of vasa previa across gestation using a screening protocol. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 141–7.
Bronsteen, R, Whitten, A, Balasubramanian, M, et al. Vasa previa: clinical presentations, outcomes, and implications for management. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122: 352–7.
Antoine, C, Young, BK, Silverman, F, Greco, MA, Alvarez, SP. Sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern with vasa previa in twin pregnancy. J Reprod Med 1982; 27: 295–300.
Dougall, A, Baird, CH. Vasa previa: report of three cases and review of literature. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 712–15.
Derbala, Y, Grochal, F, Jeanty, P. Vasa previa. J Prenat Med 2007; 1: 2–13.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Placenta Praevia, Placenta Praevia Accreta and Vasa Praevia: Diagnosis and Management. Green-top Guideline No. 27. London: RCOG, 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg27/ (accessed March 2017).
Gagnon, R, Morin, L, Bly, S, et al. Guidelines for the management of vasa previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2009; 31: 748–60.
Oyelese, Y, Catanzarite, V, Prefumo, F, et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937–42.
Paavonen, J, Jouttunpää, K, Kangasluoma, P, et al. Velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord and vasa previa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1984; 22: 207–11.
Watson, R. Antepartum haemorrhage of uncertain origin. Br J Clin Pract 1982; 36: 222–6.
Macafee, CHG, Harley, JMG. Antepartum haemorrhage. In Claye, A (ed.), British Obstetric Practice: Obstetrics, 3rd edn. London: Heinemann, 1963, pp 195–204.
Willocks, J. Antepartum haemorrhage of uncertain origin. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 78: 987–91.
Naftolin, F, Khudr, G, Benirschke, K, Hutchinson, DL. The syndrome of chronic abruptio placentae, hydorrhoea and circumvallate placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 116: 347–50.
Walker, J, MacGillivary, I, MacNaughton, MC (eds). Combined Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 9th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1976, pp. 133–45.
References
Boyle, B, McConkey, R, Garne, E, et al. Trends in the prevalence, risk and pregnancy outcome of multiple births with congenital anomaly: a registry-based study in 14 European countries 1984–2007. BJOG 2013; 120: 707–16.
Office for National Statistics. Birth characteristics in England and Wales: 2016. Statistical Bulletin October 2017. www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthcharacteristicsinenglandandwales/2016 (accessed September 2018).
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Driscoll, AK, Drake, P. Births: final data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018; 67(1): 1–55. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr67/nvsr67_01.pdf (accessed September 2018).
Vayssiere, C, Benoist, G, Blondel, B, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 156: 12–17.
Hall, JG. Twinning. Lancet 2003; 362: 735–43.
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Sutton, PD, et al. Births: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57: 1–102
Chauhan, SP, Scardo, JA, Hayes, E, Abuhamad, AZ, Berghella, V. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 305–15.
Macfarlane, A, Blondel, B. Demographic trends in Western European countries. In Blickstein, I, Keith, LG (eds), Multiple Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Gestation, and Perinatal Outcome, 2nd edn. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005, pp. 11–21.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Multiple births and single embryo transfer review, 2013. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/Multiple-births-after-IVF.html (accessed March 2017).
Weber, MA, Sebire, NJ. Genetics and developmental pathology of twinning. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 15: 313–18.
Benirschke, K, Kim, CK. Multiple pregnancy. 2. N Engl J Med 1973; 288: 1329–36.
Derom, C, Vlietinck, R, Derom, R, Van den Berghe, H, Thiery, M. Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction. Lancet 1987; 1: 1236–8.
Umranikar, A, Parmar, D, Davies, S, Fountain, S. Multiple births following in vitro fertilization treatment: redefining success. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 170: 299–304.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Fertility Problems: Assessment and Treatment. Clinical Guideline CG156. London: NICE, 2013. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156 (accessed March 2017).
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Multiple Pregnancy Following Assisted Reproduction. Scientific Impact Paper No. 22. London: RCOG, 2011. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/sip_no_22.pdf (accessed March 2017).
Luke, B, Brown, MB, Wantman, E, Stern, JE. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 683–9.
Busnelli, A, Dallagiovanna, C, Reschini, M, et al. Risk factors for monozygotic twinning after in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2019; 111: 302–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.025.
Glujovsky, D, Blake, D, Farquhar, C, Bardach, A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (7): CD002118.
McLernon, D, Harrild, K, Bergh, C, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 341: c6945.
Gelbaya, TA, Tsoumpou, I, Nardo, LG. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 936–45.
Luke, B, Gopal, D, Cabral, H, et al. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 330.e1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025.
Helmerhorst, FM, Perquin, DA, Donker, D, Keirse, MJ. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ 2004; 328: 261.
Santana, DS, Cecatti, JG, Surita, FG, et al. Twin pregnancy and severe maternal outcomes: the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127: 631–41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001338.
Rao, A, Sairam, S, Shehata, H. Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18: 557–76.
Sibai, BM, Hauth, J, Caritis, S, et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 938–42.
Laine, K, Murzakanova, G, Sole, KB, et al. Prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies: a population-based register study. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (7): e029908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029908.
Schwartz, DB, Daoud, Y, Zazula, P, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 912–14.
Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 75–84.
Blondel, B, Macfarlane, A, Gissler, M, Breart, G, Zeitlin, J. General obstetrics: preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG 2006; 113: 528–35.
Victoria, A, Mora, G, Arias, F. Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 310–15.
Ross, LE, McQueen, K, Vigod, S, Dennis, CL. Risk for postpartum depression associated with assisted reproductive technologies and multiple births: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 96–106.
Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH). Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safe: 2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. London: CEMACH, 2007.
Sebire, N Anomalous development in twins (including monozygotic duplication). In Kilby, M, Baker, P, Critchley, H, Field, D (eds), Multiple Pregnancy. London: RCOG Press; 2006, pp. 59–88.
Glinianaia, SV, Rankin, J, Wright, C. Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1306–11.
Morin, L, Lim, K, Bly, S, et al. Ultrasound in twin pregnancies: no. 260, June 2011. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2011; 115: 117–18.
Berghella, V, Saccone, G. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 9: CD007235. https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub4.
Sun, LM, Chen, XK, Wen, SW, et al. Perinatal outcomes of normal cotwins in twin pregnancies with one structurally anomalous fetus: a population-based retrospective study. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 51–6.
Pandya, PP, Snijders, RJ, Psara, N, Hilbert, L, Nicolaides, KH. The prevalence of non-viable pregnancy at 10–13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 170–3.
Sebire, NJ, Snijders, RJ, Hughes, K, Sepulveda, W, Nicolaides, KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 1203–7.
D’Antonio, F, Khalil, A, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B. Early fetal loss in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 632–6.
Sebire, NJ, Thornton, S, Hughes, K, Snijders, RJ, Nicolaides, KH. The prevalence and consequences of missed abortion in twin pregnancies at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 847–8.
Landy, H, Keith, L. The vanishing twin: a review. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 177–83.
Kamath, MS, Antonisamy, B, Selliah, HY, Sunkara, SK. Perinatal outcomes of singleton live births with and without vanishing twin following transfer of multiple embryos: analysis of 113 784 singleton live births. Hum Reprod 2018; 33: 2018–22. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey284.
Ong, S, Zamora, J, Khan, K, Kilby, M. Prognosis for the co-twin following single-twin death: a systematic review. BJOG 2006; 113: 992–8.
Hillman, SC, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Co-twin prognosis after single fetal death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 928–40.
D’Antonio, F, Thilaganathan, B, Dias, T, et al. Influence of chorionicity and gestational age at single fetal loss on risk of preterm birth in twin pregnancy: analysis of STORK multiple pregnancy cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 723–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.17426.
Breathnach, FM, Malone, FD. Fetal growth disorders in twin gestations. Semin Perinatol 2012; 36: 175–81.
Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al. Definition of intertwin birth weight discordance. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118: 94–103.
Lewi, L, Deprest, J. Management of twin pregnancies: where do we go from here? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 601–4.
Kalafat, E, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghiou, A, Bhide, A, Khalil, A. Significance of placental cord insertion site in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 378–84. doi: 10.1002/uog.18914.
Couck, I, Mourad Tawfic, N, Deprest, J, et al. Does site of cord insertion increase risk of adverse outcome, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and discordant growth in monochorionic twin pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 385–9. doi: 10.1002/uog.18926.
Jones, R, Roberton, N. Small for dates babies: are they really a problem? Arch Dis Child 1986; 61: 877–80.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 169: Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: e131–46.
Miller, J, Chauhan, SP, Abuhamad, AZ. Discordant twins: diagnosis, evaluation and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 10–20.
Ananth, CV, Joseph, K, Demissie, K, Vintzileos, AM. Trends in twin preterm birth subtypes in the United States, 1989 through 2000: impact on perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1076.e1–9.
Kiely, JL. What is the population-based risk of preterm birth among twins and other multiples? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998; 41: 3–11.
Stoll, BJ, Hansen, NI, Bell, EF, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 443–56.
Murphy, D, MacKenzie, I. The mortality and morbidity associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 826–30.
Cohen, M, Kohl, S, Rosenthal, A. Fetal interlocking complicating twin gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 91: 407–12.
Pharoah, P. Neurological outcome in twins. Semin Neonatol 2002; 7: 223–30.
MBRRACE-UK. Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report: UK perinatal deaths for births from January to December 2014. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 2016. https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/mbrrace-uk/reports/MBRRACE-UK-PMS-Report-2014.pdf (accessed March 2017).
Draper, ES, Gallimore, ID, Kurinczuk, JJ, et al., on behalf of the MBRRACE-UK Collaboration. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report, UK Perinatal Deaths for Births from January to December 2016. Leicester: Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2018.
Danon, D, Sekar, R, Hack, KE, Fisk, NM. Increased stillbirth in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 1318–26.
Dube, J, Dodds, L, Armson, BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: 579–83.
Barigye, O, Pasquini, L, Galea, P, et al. High risk of unexpected late fetal death in monochorionic twins despite intensive ultrasound surveillance: a cohort study. PLoS Med 2005; 2 (6): e172.
Spitz, L. Conjoined twins. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 814–19.
Mutchinick, OM, Luna-Muñoz, L, Amar, E, et al. Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2011; 157C: 274–87.
Chen, CP, Hsu, CY, Su, JW, et al. Conjoined twins detected in the first trimester: a review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 50: 424–31.
Dias, T, Mahsud-Dornan, S, Bhide, A, Papageorghiou, AT, Thilaganathan, B. Cord entanglement and perinatal outcome in monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 201–4.
Baxi, LV, Walsh, CA. Monoamniotic twins in contemporary practice: a single-center study of perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 506–10.
Hack, KE, Derks, JB, Schaap, AH, et al. Perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 353–60.
Rossi, AC, Prefumo, F. Impact of cord entanglement on perinatal outcome of monoamniotic twins: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 131–5.
Sueters, M, Oepkes, D. Diagnosis of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective fetal growth restriction, twin anaemia-polycythaemia sequence, and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28: 215–26.
Khalil, A, Beune, I, Hecher, K, et al. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 47–54. doi: 10.1002/uog.19013.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy, 2nd edn. Green-top Guideline No. 51. London: RCOG, 2016. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg51/ (accessed March 2017).
Gratacos, E, Antolin, E, Lewi, L, et al. Monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (Type III): feasibility and perinatal outcome of fetoscopic placental laser coagulation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 669–75.
Gratacos, E, Lewi, L, Muñoz, B, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 28–34.
Healey, MG. Acardia: predictive risk factors for the co-twin’s survival. Teratology 1994; 50: 205–13.
Lewi, L, Valencia, C, Gonzalez, E, Deprest, J, Nicolaides, KH. The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 213.e1–4.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Intrauterine laser ablation of placental vessels for the treatment of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance IPG198. London: NICE, 2006. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg198 (accessed March 2017).
Denbow, M, Fogliani, R, Kyle, P, et al. Haematological indices at fetal blood sampling in monochorionic pregnancies complicated by feto-fetal transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18: 941–6.
Stagnati, V, Zanardini, C, Fichera, A, et al. Early prediction of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016. doi: 10.1002/uog.15989. [Epub ahead of print]
Mackie, FL, Whittle, R, Morris, RK, et al. First-trimester ultrasound measurements and maternal serum biomarkers as prognostic factors in monochorionic twins: a cohort study. Diagn Progn Res 2019; 3: 9. doi: 10.1186/s41512-019-0054-9.
Simpson, LL. Twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 3–18.
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 550–5.
Lopriore, E, Oepkes, D, Walther, FJ. Neonatal morbidity in twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Early Hum Dev 2011; 87: 595–9.
Tollenaar, LSA, Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Improved prediction of twin anemia–polycythemia sequence by delta middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: new antenatal classification system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 788–93. doi: 10.1002/uog.20096.
Tavares de Sousa, M, Fonseca, A, Hecher, K. Role of fetal intertwin difference in middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in predicting neonatal twin anemia–polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 794–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.20116.
Slaghekke, F, Kist, WJ, Oepkes, D, et al. Twin anemia–polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 181–90.
Ellings, JM, Newman, RB, Hulsey, TC, Bivins, HA, Keenan, A. Reduction in very low birth weight deliveries and perinatal mortality in a specialized, multidisciplinary twin clinic. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 387–91.
Newman, RB, Ellings, JM. Antepartum management of the multiple gestation: the case for specialized care. Semin Perinatol 1995; 19: 387–403.
Ruk, RJ, Brown, CE, Peters, MT, Johnston, AB. Specialized care for twin gestations: improving newborn outcomes und reducing costs. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2001; 30: 52–60.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Multiple pregnancy: twin and triplet pregnancies. NICE Quality Standard QS 46. London: NICE, 2013 (updated September 2019). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs46 (accessed February 2020).
Twins and Multiple Births Association. NICE Works: Twins and Multiple Births Association Maternity Engagement Project Final Report. Aldershot: TAMBA, 2019. https://twinstrust.org/uploads/assets/afcc44b3-776e-4341-8a16e9bd990c3425/NICE-works-final-report.pdf (accessed February 2020).
Ballard, CK, Bricker, L, Reed, K, Wood, L, Neilson, JP. Nutritional advice for improving outcomes in multiple pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (6): CD008867.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Twin and Triplet Pregnancy. NICE Guideline NG137. London: NICE, 2019. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng137 (accessed December 2020).
Lewi, L, Lewi, P, Diemert, A, et al. The role of ultrasound examination in the first trimester and at 16 weeks’ gestation to predict fetal complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 493.e1–7.
Kurtz, A, Wapner, R, Mata, J, Johnson, A, Morgan, P. Twin pregnancies: accuracy of first-trimester abdominal US in predicting chorionicity and amnionicity. Radiology 1992; 185: 759–62.
Monteagudo, A, Timor-Tritsch, IE, Sharma, S. Early and simple determination of chorionic and amniotic type in multifetal gestations in the first fourteen weeks by high-frequency transvaginal ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 824–9.
Lu, J, Cheng, YKY, Ting, YH, Law, KM, Leung, TY. Pitfalls in assessing chorioamnionicity: novel observations and literature review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 242–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.010.
Dias, T, Ladd, S, Mahsud-Dornan, S, et al. Systematic labeling of twin pregnancies on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 130–3.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal Care for Uncomplicated Pregnancies. NICE Clinical Guideline CG62. London: NICE, 2008. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62 (accessed March 2017).
Spencer, K Screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies in the first trimester using free β-hCG and PAPP-A, combined with fetal nuchal translucency thickness. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20: 91–5.
NHS Screening Programmes. Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme: Programme Handbook. June 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/456654/FASP_programme_handbook_August_2015.pdf (accessed March 2017).
Gil, MM, Quezada, MS, Revello, R, Akolekar, R, Nicolaides, KH. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 249–66.
Canick, JA, Kloza, EM, Lambert-Messerlian, GM, et al. DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to identify Down syndrome and other trisomies in multiple gestations. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 730–4.
Attilakos, G, Maddocks, DG, Davies, T, et al. Quantification of free fetal DNA in multiple pregnancies and relationship with chorionicity. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 967–72.
Leung, TY, Qu, JZ, Liao, GJ, et al. Noninvasive twin zygosity assessment and aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33: 675–81.
Qu, JZ, Leung, TY, Jiang, P, et al. Noninvasive prenatal determination of twin zygosity by maternal plasma DNA analysis. Clin Chem 2013; 59: 427–35.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Chromosomal Abnormality using Maternal Plasma DNA. Scientific Impact Paper No. 15. London: RCOG, 2014. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/sip_15_04032014.pdf (accessed March 2017).
American College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists. Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: e31–7.
Benn, P, Borrell, A, Chiu, RW, et al. Position statement from the Chromosome Abnormality Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35: 725–34.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling. Green-top Guideline No. 8. London: RCOG, 2010. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_8.pdf (accessed March 2017).
Yukobowich, E, Anteby, EY, Cohen, SM, et al. Risk of fetal loss in twin pregnancies undergoing second trimester amniocentesis(1). Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 231–4.
Millaire, M, Bujold, E, Morency, AM, Gauthier, RJ. Mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis in twin pregnancy and the risk of fetal loss. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28: 512–18.
Weisz, B, Rodeck, CH. Invasive diagnostic procedures in twin pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 751–8.
Antsaklis, A, Daskalakis, G, Souka, AP, Kavalakis, Y, Michalas, S. Fetal blood sampling in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 377–9.
D’Antonio, F, Odibo, AO, Prefumo, F, et al. Weight discordance and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 11–23. doi: 10.1002/uog.18966.
Leombroni, M, Liberati, M, Fanfani, F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in predicting birth-weight discordance in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 442–50. doi: 10.1002/uog.17348.
Townsend, R, Duffy, JM, Sileo, F, et al.; International Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes for Selective Fetal Growth Restriction (CHOOSE-FGR). A core outcome set for studies investigating the management of selective fetal growth restriction in twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; doi: 10.1002/uog.20388.
Khalil, A, Duffy, JMN, Perry, H, et al.; International Collaboration to Harmonise Outcomes for Selective Fetal Growth Restriction (CHOOSE-FGR). Study protocol: developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies. Trials 2019; 20 (1): 35. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3153-y.
Ishii, K, Murakoshi, T, Takahashi, Y, Shinno, T, Matsushita, M, Naruse, H, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction and different types of umbilical artery Doppler under expectant management. Fetal Diagn Ther 2009; 26: 157–61.
Townsend, R, D’Antonio, F, Sileo, FG, et al. Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 36–46. doi: 10.1002/uog.20114.
Monaghan, C, Kalafat, E, Binder, J, Thilaganathan, B, Khalil, A. Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 200–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.19078.
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJK, Curtin, SC, Mathews, TJ. National vital statistics reports. Births: final data for 2013–2015.
Breathnach, FM, McAuliffe, FM, Geary, M, et al.; Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Optimum timing for planned delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 50–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d7b06.
Conde-Agudelo A, Romero, R, Hassan, SS, Yeo, L. Transvaginal sonographic cervical length for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 128.e1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.064.
Lee, YM. Delivery of twins. Semin Perinatol 2012; 36: 195–200.
Singer, E, Pilpel, S, Bsat, F, Plevyak, M, Healy, A, Markenson, G. Accuracy of fetal fibronectin to predict preterm birth in twin gestations with symptoms of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1083–7.
Gyamfi, C, Lerner, V, Holzman, I, Stone, JL. Routine cervical length in twins and perinatal outcomes. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24: 65–9.
da Silva Lopes, K, Takemoto, Y, Ota, E, Tanigaki, S, Mori, R. Bed rest with and without hospitalisation in multiple pregnancy for improving perinatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (3): CD012031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012031.pub2.
Sosa, C, Althabe, F, Belizan, J, Bergel, E. Bed rest in singleton pregnancies for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1): CD003581.
Norman, JE, Mackenzie, F, Owen, P, et al. Progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancy (STOPPIT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 373: 2034–40.
Dodd, JM, Grivell, RM, O’Brien, CM, Dowswell, T, Deussen, AR. Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; (11). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub3.
Schuit, E, Stock, S, Rode, L, et al. Effectiveness of progestogens to improve perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies: an individual participant data meta-analysis. BJOG 2015; 122: 27–37.
Romero, R, Conde-Agudelo, A, El-Refaie, W, et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta‐analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 49: 303–14. doi: 10.1002/uog.17397.
Rafael, TJ, Berghella, V, Alfirevic, Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (9): CD009166.
Liem, SM, van Pampus, MG, Mol, BW, Bekedam, DJ. Cervical pessaries for the prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013; 2013: 576723.
Liem, S, Schuit, E, Hegeman, M, et al. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 382: 1341–9.
Goya, M, Pratcorona, L, Merced, C, et al. Cervical pessary in 112 pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1800–6.
Nicolaides, KH, Syngelaki, A, Poon, LC, et al. Cervical pessary placement for prevention of preterm birth in unselected twin pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214(1): 3.e1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.051.
Pratcorona, L, Goya, M, Merced, C, et al. Cervical pessary to reduce preterm birth <34 weeks of gestation after an episode of preterm labor and a short cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 99.e1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.031.
Thangatorai, R, Lim, FC, Nalliah, S. Cervical pessary in the prevention of preterm births in multiple pregnancies with a short cervix: PRISMA compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 1638–45. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1319930.
Norman, JE, Norrie, J, Maclennan, G, et al. Open randomised trial of the (Arabin) pessary to prevent preterm birth in twin pregnancy with health economics and acceptability: STOPPIT-2 – a study protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8 (12): e026430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026430.
Hashimoto, LN, Hornung, RW, Lindsell, CJ, Brewer, DE, Donovan, EF. Effects of antenatal glucocorticoids on outcomes of very low birth weight multifetal gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 804–10.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Preterm Prelabour Rupture of the Membranes. Green-top Guideline No. 44. London: RCOG, 2010. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_44.pdf (accessed March 2017).
Kenyon, S, Brocklehurst, P, Jones, D, et al.; MRC ORACLE Children Study. Long term outcomes following prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with either spontaneous preterm labour or preterm rupture of the membranes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008; 8: 14.
Sela, HY, Simpson, LL. Preterm premature rupture of membranes complicating twin pregnancy: management considerations. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 54: 321–9.
Doyle, LW, Crowther, CA, Middleton, P, Marret, S, Rouse, D. Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (1): CD004661.
Wu, MY, Chen, SU, Lee, CN, Ho, HN, Yang, YS. Use of atosiban in a twin pregnancy with extremely preterm premature rupture in the membrane of one twin: a case report and literature review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 49: 495–9.
Cheung, KW, Seto, MTY, Wang, W, et al. Effect of delayed interval delivery of remaining fetus(es) in multiple pregnancies on survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222: 306–319.e18. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.046.
Dodd, J, Crowther, C. Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies to twins. Fertil Steril 2004; 81: 1420–2.
Wimalasundera, RC. Selective reduction and termination of multiple pregnancies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 15: 327–35.
Devine, PC, Malone, FD, Athanassiou, A, Harvey-Wilkes, K, D’Alton, ME. Maternal and neonatal outcome of 100 consecutive triplet pregnancies. Am J Perinatol 2001; 18: 225–35.
Petterson, B, Nelson, KB, Watson, L, Stanley, F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980s. BMJ 1993; 307: 1239–43.
Curado, J, D'antonio, F, Papageorghiou, AT, et al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in triplet pregnancy according to chorionicity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54: 589–95. https://doi.org//10.1002/uog.20209.
Antsaklis, A, Anastasakis, E. Selective reduction in twins and multiple pregnancies. J Perinat Med 2011; 39: 15–21.
Zipori, Y, Haas, J, Berger, H, Barzilay, E. Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplets to twins compared with non-reduced triplets: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35: 296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.05.012.
Anthoulakis, C, Dagklis, T, Mamopoulos, A, Athanasiadis, A. Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 1351–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex084.
Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA. Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (10): CD003932.
Evans, MI, Goldberg, JD, Horenstein, J, et al. Selective termination for structural, chromosomal, and Mendelian anomalies: international experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 893–7.
Evans, MI, Goldberg, JD, Dommergues, M, et al. Efficacy of second-trimester selective termination for fetal abnormalities: international collaborative experience among the world’s largest centers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 90–4.
Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. Umbilical cord occlusion for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twins: a systematic review of literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 123–9.
Schreiner-Engel, P, Walther, VN, Mindes, J, Lynch, L, Berkowitz, RL. First-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction: acute and persistent psychologic reactions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 541–7.
Heyborne, KD, Porreco, RP, Garite, TJ, Phair, K, Abril, D. Improved perinatal survival of monoamniotic twins with intensive inpatient monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 96–101.
Van Mieghem T, De Heus R, Lewi, L, et al. Prenatal management of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124: 498–506. https://doi.org//10.1097/AOG.0000000000000409.
MONOMONO Working Group. Inpatient vs outpatient management and timing of delivery of uncomplicated monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy: the MONOMONO study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 175–83. https://doi.org//10.1002/uog.19179.
Hillman, S, Morris, R, Kilby, M. Single twin demise: consequence for survivors. Semin Fetal Neonat Med 2010; 15: 319–26.
Mackie, FL, Rigby, A, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Prognosis of the co-twin following spontaneous single intrauterine fetal death in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2019; 126: 569–78. https://doi.org//10.1111/1471-0528.15530.
Righini, A, Salmona, S, Bianchini, E, et al. Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ischemic brain lesions in the survivors of monochorionic twin pregnancies: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28: 87–92.
Senat, MV, Bernard, JP, Loizeau, S, Ville, Y. Management of single fetal death in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a role for fetal blood sampling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 360–3.
Tanawattanacharoen, S, Taylor, MJ, Letsky, EA, et al. Intrauterine rescue transfusion in monochorionic multiple pregnancies with recent single intrauterine death. Prenat Diagn 2001; 21: 274–8.
Brassard, M, Fouron, JC, Leduc, L, Grignon, A, Proulx, F. Prognostic markers in twin pregnancies with an acardiac fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 409–14.
Malone, FD, D’Alton, ME. Anomalies peculiar to multiple gestations. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27: 1033–46, x.
Mone, F, Devaseelan, P, Ong, S. Intervention versus a conservative approach in the management of TRAP sequence: a systematic review. J Perinat Med 2016; 44: 619–29.
Chaveeva, P, Poon, LC, Sotiriadis, A, Kosinski, P, Nicolaides, KH. Optimal method and timing of intrauterine intervention in twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: case study and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014; 35: 267–79.
Cabassa, P, Fichera, A, Prefumo, F, et al. The use of radiofrequency in the treatment of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 166: 127–32.
Lopriore, E, Sueters, M, Middeldorp, JM, et al. Neonatal outcome in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with fetoscopic laser occlusion of vascular anastomoses. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 597–602.
Khalil, A, Cooper, E, Townsend, R, Thilaganathan, B. Evolution of stage 1 twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS): systematic review and meta-analysis. Twin Res Hum Genet 2016; 19: 207–16. doi: 10.1017/thg.2016.33.
Roberts, D, Neilson, JP, Kilby, MD, Gates, S. Interventions for the treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (1): CD002073.
Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 136–44.
Crombleholme, TM, Shera, D, Lee, H, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of amnioreduction vs selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for the treatment of severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 396.e1–9.
Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. The efficacy of Quintero staging system to assess severity of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser therapy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 537–44.
Lopriore, E, Middeldorp, JM, Oepkes, D, et al. Residual anastomoses after fetoscopic laser surgery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: frequency, associated risks and outcome. Placenta 2007; 28: 204–8.
Robyr, R, Lewi, L, Salomon, LJ, et al. Prevalence and management of late fetal complications following successful selective laser coagulation of chorionic plate anastomoses in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 796–803.
Dhillon, RK, Hillman, SC, Pounds, R, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. Comparison of Solomon technique against selective laser ablation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 526–31.
van Klink, JM, Koopman, HM, van Zwet, EW, et al. Improvement in neurodevelopmental outcome in survivors of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 540.e1–7.
Morris, RK, Selman, TJ, Harbidge, A, Martin, WI, Kilby, MD. Fetoscopic laser coagulation for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: factors influencing perinatal outcome, learning curve of the procedure and lessons for new centres. BJOG 2010; 117: 1350–7.
Beck, V, Lewi, P, Gucciardo, L, Devlieger, R. Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and fetal survival after minimally invasive fetal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31: 1–9.
Yamamoto, M, El Murr, L, Robyr, R, et al. Incidence and impact of perioperative complications in 175 fetoscopy-guided laser coagulations of chorionic plate anastomoses in fetofetal transfusion syndrome before 26 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1110–16.
Rossi, AC, D’Addario, V. Comparison of donor and recipient outcomes following laser therapy performed for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: a meta-analysis and review of literature. Am J Perinatol 2009; 26: 27–32.
Herberg, U, Gross, W, Bartmann, P, et al. Long term cardiac follow up of severe twin to twin transfusion syndrome after intrauterine laser coagulation. Heart 2006; 92: 95–100.
Lopriore, E, Slaghekke, F, Oepkes, D, et al. Hematological characteristics in neonates with twin anemia–polycythemia sequence (TAPS). Prenat Diagn 2010; 30: 251–5.
Leung, TY, Tam, WH, Leung, TN, Lok, IH, Lau, TK. Effect of twin-to-twin delivery interval on umbilical cord blood gas in the second twins. BJOG 2002; 109: 63–7.
Dodd, JM, Deussen, AR, Grivell, RM, Crowther, CA. Elective birth at 37 weeks’ gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (2): CD003582.
Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA, Haslam, RR, Robinson, JS. Elective birth at 37 weeks of gestation versus standard care for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term: the Twins Timing of Birth Randomised Trial. BJOG 2012; 119: 964–73.
Morales, WJ, O’BRIEN, WF, Knuppel, RA, Gaylord, S, Hayes, P. The effect of mode of delivery on the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage in nondiscordant twin gestations under 1500 g. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 107–10.
Hofmeyr, GJ, Barrett, JF, Crowther, CA. Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (12): CD006553. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006553.pub3.
Hogle, KL, Hutton, EK, McBrien, KA, Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME. Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 220–7.
Hannah, ME, Hannah, WJ, Hewson, SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83.
Hofmeyr, GJ, Hannah, M, Lawrie, TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (7): CD000166.
Rossi, AC, Mullin, PM, Chmait, RH. Neonatal outcomes of twins according to birth order, presentation and mode of delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2011; 118: 523–32.
Barrett, JF, Hannah, ME, Hutton, EK, et al.; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1295–305.
Wildschut, H, van Roosmalen, J, van Leeuwen, E, Keirse, MJ. Planned abdominal compared with planned vaginal birth in triplet pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 292–6.
Stutchfield, P, Whitaker, R, Russell, I. Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ 2005; 331: 662.
Fox, NS, Silverstein, M, Bender, S, et al. Active second-stage management in twin pregnancies undergoing planned vaginal delivery in a US population. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 229–33.
Myles, T. Vaginal birth of twins after a previous Cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Med 2001; 10: 171–4.
D’Antonio, F, Dias, T, Thilaganathan, B; Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK). Does antenatal ultrasound labeling predict birth order in twin pregnancies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 274–7.
Yang, Q, Wen, SW, Chen, Y, et al. Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 840–7.
Yang, Q, Wen, SW, Chen, Y, et al. Neonatal mortality and morbidity in vertex-vertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. J Perinatol 2006; 26: 3–10.
Rydhstrom, H. Prognosis for twins with birth weight less than 1500 gm: the impact of cesarean section in relation to fetal presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 528–33.
Acker, D, Lieberman, M, Holbrook, RH, et al. Delivery of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 59: 710–11.
Chervenak, FA, Johnson, RE, Berkowitz, RL, Hobbins, JC. Intrapartum external version of the second twin. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 160–5.
Chauhan, SP, Roberts, WE, McLaren, RA, et al. Delivery of the nonvertex second twin: breech extraction versus external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1015–20.
Webster, SN, Loughney, AD. Internal podalic version with breech extraction. Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2011; 13: 7–14.
Rayburn, WF, Lavin, JP, Miodovnik, M, Varner, MW. Multiple gestation: time interval between delivery of the first and second twins. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 502–6.
Thompson, SA, Lyons, TL, Makowski, EL. Outcomes of twin gestations at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 1973–1983. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 328–39.
Chervenak, FA, Johnson, RE, Youcha, S, Hobbins, JC, Berkowitz, RL. Intrapartum management of twin gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 119–24.
Rydhstrom, H, Ingemarsson, I. Interval between birth of the first and the second twin and its impact on second twin perinatal mortality. J Perinat Med 1990; 18: 449–53.
Robertson, E, Celasun, N, Stewart, DE. Risk factors for postpartum depression. In Stewart, DE, Robertson, E, Dennis, CL, Grace, SL, Wallington, T (eds), Postpartum Depression: Literature Review of Risk Factors and Interventions. Toronto: Toronto Public Health, 2003. http://www.who.int/mental_health/prevention/suicide/lit_review_postpartum_depression.pdf (accessed March 2017).
Simmons, R, Doyle, P, Maconochie, N. Dramatic reduction in triplet and higher order births in England and Wales. BJOG 2004; 111: 856–8.
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1856–64.
Wen, SW, Demissie, K, Yang, Q, Walker, MC. Maternal morbidity and obstetric complications in triplet pregnancies and quadruplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 254–8.
Pandian, Z, Marjoribanks, J, Ozturk, O, Serour, G, Bhattacharya, S. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (7): CD003416.
Sepulveda, W, Sebire, NJ, Hughes, K, Odibo, A, Nicolaides, KH. The lambda sign at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of chorionicity in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 421–3.
Campbell, DM, Templeton, A. Maternal complications of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2004; 84: 71–3.
Cotter, A, Ness, A, Tolosa, J. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (4): CD001808.
References
World Health Organization. WHO: recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Modifications recommended by FIGO as amended October 14, 1976. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1977; 56: 247–53.
Steer, P. The epidemiology of preterm labour. BJOG 2005; 112 (s1): 1–3.
Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Chou, D, et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health 2013; 10 (Suppl 1): S2.
Marlow, N Full term: an artificial concept. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012; 97: F158–9.
Goldenberg, RL, Culhane, JF, Iams, JD, Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 75–84.
Blencowe, H, Cousens, S, Oestergaard, MZ, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 2012; 379: 2162–72.
Lawn, J, Kerber, K, Enweronu-Laryea, C, Cousens, S. 3.6 million neonatal deaths: what is progressing and what is not? Semin Perinatol 2010; 34: 371–86.
Winkvist, A, Mogren, I, Högberg, U. Familial patterns in birth characteristics: impact on individual and population risks. Int J Epidemiol 1998; 27: 248–54.
Shah, PS, Shah, V. Influence of the maternal birth status on offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88: 1307–18. doi: 10.3109/00016340903358820.
Strauss, JF, Romero, R, Gomez-Lopez, N, et al. Spontaneous preterm birth: advances toward the discovery of genetic predisposition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 294–314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.009.
Smid, MC, Lee, JH, Grant, JH, et al. Maternal race and intergenerational preterm birth recurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 480.e1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.051.
Esplin, MS, Manuck, TA, Varner, MW, et al. Cluster analysis of spontaneous preterm birth phenotypes identifies potential associations among preterm birth mechanisms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 429.e1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.011.
Menon, R, Velez, DR, Thorsen, P, et al. Ethnic differences in key candidate genes for spontaneous preterm birth: TNF-alpha and its receptors. Hum Hered 2006; 62: 107–18.
Engel, SA, Erichsen, HC, Savitz, DA, et al. Risk of spontaneous preterm birth is associated with common proinflammatory cytokine polymorphisms. Epidemiology 2005; 16: 469–77.
Zhang, G, Feenstra, B, Bacelis, J, et al. Genetic associations with gestational duration and spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1156–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612665.
Moore, T, Hennessy, EM, Myles, J, et al. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: the EPICure studies. BMJ 2012; 345: e7961.
Costeloe, K, Hennessy, E, Gibson, AT, Marlow, N, Wilkinson, AR. The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the threshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 659–71.
Costeloe, KL, Hennessy, EM, Haider, S, et al. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ 2012; 345: e7976.
Wood, N, Costeloe, K, Gibson, A, et al. The EPICure study: associations and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F134–40.
Mangham, LJ, Petrou, S, Doyle, LW, Draper, ES, Marlow, N. The cost of preterm birth throughout childhood in England and Wales. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e312–27.
Butler, AS, Behrman, RE. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.
Goldenberg, RL, Iams, JD, Mercer, BM, et al. The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous preterm births. NICHD MFMU Network. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 233–8.
Mercer, BM, Goldenberg, RL, Moawad, AH, et al. The preterm prediction study: effect of gestational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 1216–21.
McManemy, J, Cooke, E, Amon, E, Leet, T Recurrence risk for preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 576.e1–6.
Crane, JM, Delaney, T, Hutchens, D. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the prediction of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 37–44.
Castanon, A, Brocklehurst, P, Evans, H, et al. Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective–prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012; 345: e5174.
Levine, LD, Sammel, MD, Hirshberg, A, Elovitz, MA, Srinivas, SK. Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 360.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.09.035.
Watson, HA, Ridout, A, Shennan, AH. Second stage cesarean as risk factor for preterm birth: how to manage subsequent pregnancies? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 367–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.589.
Hickland MM, Story L, Glazewska-Hallin A, et al. Efficacy of transvaginal cervical cerclage in women at risk of preterm birth following previous emergency cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 1486–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13972.
Meis, PJ, Goldenberg, RL, Mercer, BM, et al. The preterm prediction study: risk factors for indicated preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 562–7.
Homer, HA, Li, TC, Cooke, ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 1–14.
Tomaževič, T, Ban-Frangež, H, Ribič-Pucelj, M, Premru-Sršen, T, Verdenik, I. Small uterine septum is an important risk variable for preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 135: 154–7.
Da Silva, AA, Simões, VM, Barbieri, MA, et al. Young maternal age and preterm birth. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2003; 17: 332–9.
Brett, K, Strogatz, D, Savitz, D. Employment, job strain, and preterm delivery among women in North Carolina. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 199–204.
Smith, LK, Draper, ES, Manktelow, BN, Doring, JS, Field, JA. Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92: F11–14.
Hendler, I, Goldenberg, RL, Mercer, BM, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: association between maternal body mass index and spontaneous and indicated preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 882–6.
Reagan, PB, Salsberry, PJ. Race and ethnic differences in determinants of preterm birth in the USA: broadening the social context. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 2217–28.
Simhan, HN, Bodnar, LM. Pre-pregnancy body mass index, vaginal inflammation, and the racial disparity in preterm birth. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 163: 459–66.
Zhang, J, Savitz, DA. Preterm birth subtypes among blacks and whites. Epidemiology 1992; 3: 428–33.
Balchin, I, Steer, PJ. Race, prematurity and immaturity. Early Hum Dev 2007; 83: 749–54.
Menon, R, Fortunato, SJ, Edwards, DR, Williams, SM. Association of genetic variants, ethnicity and preterm birth with amniotic fluid cytokine concentrations. Ann Hum Genet 2010; 74: 165–83.
Creasy, RK, Gummer, BA, Liggins, GC. System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 1980; 55: 692–5.
Honest, H, Bachmann, L, Sundaram, R, et al. The accuracy of risk scores in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 343–59.
Hillier, SL, Witkin, SS, Krohn, MA, et al. The relationship of amniotic fluid cytokines and preterm delivery, amniotic fluid infection, histologic chorioamnionitis, and chorioamnion infection. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 941–8.
Gomez, R, Ghezzi, F, Romero, R, et al. Premature labor and intra-amniotic infection. Clinical aspects and role of the cytokines in diagnosis and pathophysiology. Clin Perinatol 1995; 22: 281–342.
Greig, PC, Ernest, J, Teot, L, Erikkson, M, Talley, R. Amniotic fluid interleukin-6 levels correlate with histologic chorioamnionitis and amniotic fluid cultures in patients in premature labor with intact membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 1035–44.
Simhan, HN, Caritis, SN, Krohn, MA, et al. Decreased cervical proinflammatory cytokines permit subsequent upper genital tract infection during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 560–7.
Wei, SQ, Fraser, W, Luo, ZC. Inflammatory cytokines and spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 393–401.
Abbott, DS, Chin-Smith, EC, Seed, PT, et al. Raised Trappin2/elafin protein in cervico-vaginal fluid is a potential predictor of cervical shortening and spontaneous preterm birth. PloS one 2014; 9: e100771.
Stock, SJ, Duthie, L, Tremaine, T, et al. Elafin (SKALP/Trappin-2/proteinase inhibitor-3) is produced by the cervix in pregnancy and cervicovaginal levels are diminished in bacterial vaginosis. Reprod Sci 2009; 16: 1125–34.
Espinoza, J, Chaiworapongsa, T, Romero, R, et al. Antimicrobial peptides in amniotic fluid: defensins, calprotectin and bacterial/permeability-increasing protein in patients with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, intra-amniotic inflammation, preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 13: 2–21.
Rubens, CE, Sadovsky, Y, Muglia, L, et al. Prevention of preterm birth: harnessing science to address the global epidemic. Sci Transl Med 2014; 262: 262sr5.
Racicot, K, Cardenas, I, Wunsche, V, et al. Viral infection of the pregnant cervix predisposes to ascending bacterial infection. J Immunol 2013; 191: 934–41.
Kalanda, BF, Verhoeff, F, Chimsuku, L, Harper, G, Brabin, BJ. Adverse birth outcomes in a malarious area. Epidemiol Infect 2006; 134: 659–66.
Madinger, NE, Greenspoon, JS, Gray Ellrodt, A. Pneumonia during pregnancy: has modern technology improved maternal and fetal outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 657–62.
Goodnight, WH, Soper, DE. Pneumonia in pregnancy. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: S390–7.
Romero, R, Oyarzun, E, Mazor, M, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between asymptomatic bacteriuria and preterm delivery/low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 576–82.
Leitich, H, Bodner-Adler, B, Brunbauer, M, et al. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 139–47.
Chandiramani, M, Seed, PT, Orsi, NM, et al. Limited relationship between cervico-vaginal fluid cytokine profiles and cervical shortening in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm birth. PloS one 2012; 7: e52412.
Hirsch, E, Saotome, I, Hirsch, D. A model of intrauterine infection and preterm delivery in mice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1598–603.
Gibbs, RS, McDuffie, RS, Kunze, M, et al. Experimental intrauterine infection with Prevotella bivia in New Zealand White rabbits. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1082–6.
McDuffie, R, Sherman, MP, Gibbs, RS. Amniotic fluid tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1 in a rabbit model of bacterially induced preterm pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 1583–8.
Romero, R, Mazor, M, Wu, YK, et al. Infection in the pathogenesis of preterm labor. Semin Perinatol 1988; 12: 262–79.
Fidel, P, Ghezzi, F, Romero, R, et al. The effect of antibiotic therapy on intrauterine infection-induced preterm parturition in rabbits. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2003; 14: 57–64.
Amsel, R, Totten, PA, Spiegel, CA, et al. Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74: 14–22.
Brocklehurst, P, Gordon, A, Heatley, E, Milan, SJ. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (1): CD000262.
Leitich, H, Kiss, H. Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 21: 375–90.
Vermeulen, GM, Bruinse, HW. Prophylactic administration of clindamycin 2% vaginal cream to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women with an increased recurrence risk: a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 652–7.
Shennan, A, Crawshaw, S, Briley, A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of metronidazole for the prevention of preterm birth in women positive for cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin: the PREMET Study. BJOG 2006; 113: 65–74.
Kurkinen-Räty, M, Vuopala, S, Koskela, M, et al. A randomised controlled trial of vaginal clindamycin for early pregnancy bacterial vaginosis. BJOG 2000; 107: 1427–32.
Othman, M, Neilson, J, Alfirevic, Z. Probiotics for preventing preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (1): CD005941.
Nicolle, LE, Bradley, S, Colgan, R, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40: 643–54.
Zalmanovici Trestioreanu, A, Lador, A, Sauerbrun-Cutler, MT, Leibovici, L, Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (4): CD009534.
Meiss, PJ, Michielutte, R, Peters, T, et al. Factors associated with preterm birth in Cardiff, Wales: II. Indicated and spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 597–602.
Villar, J, Gulmezoglu, AM, De Onis, M. Nutritional and antimicrobial interventions to prevent preterm birth: an overview of randomized controlled trials. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1998; 53: 575–85.
Smaill, FM, Vazquez, JC. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (8): CD000490.
Heath, V, Southall, T, Souka, A, Novakov, A, Nikolaides, KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 1998; 12: 304–11.
Iams, JD, Goldenberg, RL, Meis, PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Eng J Med 1996; 334: 567–73.
Onek, JD, Iams, J, Blumenfeld, M, et al. Measurement of cervical length in pregnancy: comparison between vaginal ultrasonography and digital examination. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 172–5.
To, M, Skentou, C, Chan, C, Zagaliki, A, Nikolaides, KH. Cervical assessment at the routine 23-week scan: standardizing techniques. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 2001; 17: 217–19.
Guzman, E, Walters, C, Ananth, C, et al. A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 2001; 18: 204–10.
Owen, J, Yost, N, Berghella, V, et al. Midtrimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA 2001; 286: 1340–8.
Watson, WJ, Stevens, D, Welter, S, Day, D. Observations on the sonographic measurement of cervical length and the risk of premature birth. J Matern Fetal Med 1999; 8: 17–19
Berghella, V, Tolosa, JE, Kuhlman, K, et al. Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 723–30.
Andrews, WW, Copper, R, Hauth, JC, et al. Second-trimester cervical ultrasound: associations with increased risk for recurrent early spontaneous delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 222–6.
Cook, CM, Ellwood, D. The cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery in “at-risk” women. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 2000; 15: 109–13.
Hassan, SS, Romero, R, Berry, SM, et al. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length ≤ 15 mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1458–67.
Fuchs, I, Henrich, W, Osthues, K, Dudenhausen, JW. Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 2004; 24: 554–7.
Sotiriadis, A, Papatheodorou, S, Kavvadias, A, Makrydimas, G. Transvaginal cervical length measurement for prediction of preterm birth in women with threatened preterm labor: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 2010; 35: 54–64.
Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Ventura, SJ, et al. Births: final data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013; 62: 1–90.
Lim, AC, Hegeman, MA, Huis In ‘T Veld, MA, et al. Cervical length measurement for the prediction of preterm birth in multiple pregnancies: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 2011; 38: 10–17.
Fox, NS, Rebarber, A, Klauser, CK, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancies using the change in cervical length over time. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202: 155.e1–4.
Hofmeister, C, Brizot, MdeL, Liao, A, Francisco, RP, Zugaib, M. Two-stage transvaginal cervical length screening for preterm birth in twin pregnancies. J Perinat Med 2010; 38: 479–84.
Oh, KJ, Park, KH, Jeong, EH, et al. The change in cervical length over time as a predictor of preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies who have a normal mid-trimester cervical length. Twin Res Hum Genet 2012; 15: 516–21.
Khalil, MI, Alzahrani, MH, Ullah, A. The use of cervical length and change in cervical length for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013; 169: 193–6.
Conde-Agudelo, A, Romero, R. Prediction of preterm birth in twin gestations using biophysical and biochemical tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 583–95.
McLaren, JS, Hezelgrave, NL, Ayubi, H, Seed, P, Shennan, AH. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth using quantitative fetal fibronectin after recent sexual intercourse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 89.e1–5.
Hezelgrave, NL, Kuhrt, K, Cottam, K, et al. The effect of blood staining on cervicovaginal quantitative fetal fibronectin concentration and prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 208: 103–8.
Lockwood, CJ, Senyei, AE, Dische, MR, et al. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 669–74
Shennan, AH, Jones, G, Haken, J, et al. Fetal fibronectin test predicts delivery before 30 weeks of gestation in high risk women, but increases anxiety. BJOG 2005; 112: 293–8.
Goepfert, AR, Goldenberg, RL, Mercer, B, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: Quantitative fetal fibronectin values and the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 1480–3.
Honest, H, Bachmann, LM, Gupta, JK, Kleijnen, J, Khan, KS. Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review. BMJ 2002; 325: 301.
Iams, JD, Casal, D, McGregor, JA, et al. Fetal fibronectin improves the accuracy of diagnosis of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 141–5.
Abbott, DA, Hezelgrave, NL, Seed, PT, et al. Quantitative fetal fibronectin to predict preterm Birth in asymptomatic women at high risk. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1168–76.
Abbott, DS, Radford, SK, Seed, PT, Tribe, RM, Shennan, AH. Evaluation of a quantitative fetal fibronectin test for spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 122.e1–6.
DeFranco, EA, Lewis, DF, Odibo, AO. Improving the screening accuracy for preterm labor: is the combination of fetal fibronectin and cervical length in symptomatic patients a useful predictor of preterm birth? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 233.e1–6.
Kuhrt K, Hezelgrave-Elliott N, Stock SJ, et al. Quantitative fetal fibronectin for prediction of preterm birth in asymptomatic twin pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 1191–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13861.
Watson, HA, Seed, PT, Carter, J, et al. Development and validation of the predictive models for the QUiPP App v.2: a tool for predicting preterm birth in high-risk asymptomatic women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019 Jul 20. doi: 10.1002/uog.20401.
Carter, J, Seed, PT, Watson, HA, et al. Development and validation of prediction models for the QUiPP App v.2: a tool for predicting preterm birth in women with symptoms of threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019 Aug 6. doi: 10.1002/uog.20422.
Goodfellow, L, Care, A, Sharp, A, et al. Effect of QUiPP prediction algorithm on treatment decisions in women with a previous preterm birth: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2019; 126) :1569–75. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15886.
Petch, S, DeMaio, A, Daly, S. Prediction of recurrent preterm delivery in asymptomatic women: an anxiety reducing measure? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2019; 4: 100064. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100064.
Dawes, LK, Prentice, LR, Huang, Y, Groom, KM. The Biomarkers for Preterm Birth Study: a prospective observational study comparing the impact of vaginal biomarkers on clinical practice when used in women with symptoms of preterm labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2020; 99: 249–58. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13729.
Akercan, F, Kazandi, M, Sendag, F, et al. Value of cervical phosphorylated insulin like growth factor binding protein-1 in the prediction of preterm labor. J Reprod Med 2004; 49: 368–72.
Honest, H, Hyde, CJ, Khan, KS. Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth: no good test for predicting a spontaneous preterm birth. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 24: 422–33.