Abkarian, G. G., Jones, A., and West, G.. 1992. Young children’s idiom comprehension: trying to get the picture. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 35, 580–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aboh, E., and DeGraff, M.. 2016. A null theory of creole formation based on universal grammar. In Roberts, I. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, 401–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Abouguendia, M., and Noels, K. A.. 2001. General and acculturation-related daily hassles and psychological adjustment in first- and second-generation South Asian immigrants to Canada. International Journal of Psychology 36, 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrahamsson, N., and Hyltenstam, K.. 2008. The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrahamsson, N., and Hyltenstam, K.. 2009. Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59, 249–306.Google Scholar

Abutalebi, J., and Green, D. W.. 2007. Bilingual language production: the neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 20, 242–75.Google Scholar

Aissen, J. 1994. Tzotzil auxiliaries. Linguistics 32, 657–90.Google Scholar

Aissen, J. 2003. Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, 435–48.Google Scholar

Aissen, J., England, N. C., and Zavala Maldonado, R.. 2017. Introduction. In Aissen, J., England, N. C., and Zavala Maldonado, R. (eds.), Mayan Languages, 1–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Aksu-Koç, A. 1994. Development of linguistic forms: Turkish. In Berman, R. A. and Slobin, D. I. (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study, 329–88. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Aksu-Koç, A., and Slobin, D. I.. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 159–67. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Albirini, A., and Benmamoun, E.. 2014a. Concatenative and nonconcatenative plural formation in L1, L2, and heritage speakers of Arabic. Modern Language Journal 98, 854–71.Google Scholar

Albirini, A., and Benmamoun, E.. 2014b. Aspects of second language transfer in the oral production of Egyptian and Palestinian heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 18, 244–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albirini, A., and Benmamoun, E.. 2015. Factors affecting the retention of sentential negation in heritage Egyptian Arabic. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8, 470–89.Google Scholar

Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Chakrani, B.. 2013. Gender and number agreement in the oral production of Arabic heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 1–18.Google Scholar

Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Saadah, E.. 2011. Grammatical features of Egyptian and Palestinian heritage speakers’ oral production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 273–303.Google Scholar

Aldridge, E. 2004. Ergativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Algeo, J., and Butcher, C.. 2013. The Origins and Development of the English Language. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Allen, S. 2007. The future of Inuktitut in the face of majority languages: bilingualism or language shift? Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 515–36.Google Scholar

Allen, S. 2013. The acquisition of ergativity in Inuktitut. In Bavin, E. and Stoll, S. (eds.), The Acquisition of Ergativity, 71–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, S., Genesee, F., Fish, S., and Crago, M.. 2002. Patterns of code mixing in English–Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In Du Bois, J. W., Kumpf, L. E., and Ashby, W. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 2, 171–88. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Allen, S., Crago, M., and Pesco, D.. 2006. The effect of majority language exposure on minority language skills: the case of Inuktitut. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9, 578–96.Google Scholar

Ambridge, B., and Rowland, C.. 2013. Experimental methods in studying child language acquisition. WIREs Cognitive Science 4, 149–68.Google Scholar

Ammerlaan, T. 1996. You Get It a Bit Wobbly … Exploring Bilingual Lexical Retrieval in the Context of First Language Attrition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulou, E. 2006. Clitic doubling. In Everaert, M. and Riemsdijk, H. van (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Ch. 14. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Annear, L., and Speth, K.. 2015. Maintaining a multilingual repertoire: lexical change in American Norwegian. In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 201–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Anstatt, T. 2009. Von Fröschen und Jungen: Die Kategorie der Belebtheit bei Russischsprechern in Deutschland. Paper presented at the XXXVth Konstanzer Slavistisches Arbeitstreffen, Salzburg.Google Scholar

Anstatt, T. 2011. Sprachattrition: Abbau der Erstsprache bei russisch–deutschen Jugendlichen. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 67, 7–31.Google Scholar

Anstatt, T. 2013. Polnisch als Herkunftssprache: Sprachspezifische grammatische Kategorien bei bilingualen Jugendlichen. In Kempgen, S. et al. (eds.), Deutsche Beiträge zum 15. Internationalen Slavistenkongress, Minsk 2013, 15–25. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar

Anstatt, T. 2017. Language attitudes and linguistic skills in young heritage speakers of Russian in Germany. In Isurin, L. and Riehl, C. M. (eds.), Integration, Identity and Language Maintenance in Young Immigrants: Russian Germans or German Russians, 197–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antón-Méndez, I., Nicol, J. L., and Garrett, M. F.. 2002. The relation between gender and number agreement processing. Syntax 5, 1–25.Google Scholar

Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., and Kroos, C., C. 2011. Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics 39, 558–70.Google Scholar

Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., and Choueiri, L.. 2010. The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aoun, J., and Li, Y.-H. A.. 1989. Constituency and scope. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 141–72.Google Scholar

Aoun, J., and Li, Y.-H. A.. 2003. Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Applebaum, A., and Gordon, M.. 2013. A comparative phonetic study of the Circassian languages. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Languages of the Caucasus, 3–17.Google Scholar

Arregi, K. 2002. Focus on Basque Movements. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Arregi, K., and Nevins, A.. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arslan, S., Bastiaanse, R., and Felser, C.. 2015. Looking at the evidence in visual world: eye-movements reveal how bilingual and monolingual Turkish speakers process grammatical evidentiality. Frontiers in Psychology 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01387.Google Scholar

Asherov, D., Fishman, A., and Cohen, E.-G.. 2016. Vowel reduction in Israeli heritage Russian. Heritage Language Journal 13, 113–33.Google Scholar

Au, T. K.-F., and Oh, J.. 2009. Korean as a heritage language. In Ping, Li (ed.), Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics, Part III: Korean Psycholinguistics, 268–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Au, T. K.-F., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., and Oh, J. S.. 2002. Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science 13, 238–43.Google Scholar

Au, T. K.-F., Oh, J. S., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., and Romo, L.. 2008. Salvaging a childhood language. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 998–1011.Google Scholar

Avanesov, R. I. 1977. Dialektologičeskie issledovanija po russkomu jazyku. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar

Avrutin, S., and Babyonyshev, M.. 1997. Obviation in subjunctive clauses and AGR: evidence from Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15, 229–62.Google Scholar

Babaii, E., and Ansary, H.. 2001. The C-test: a valid operationalization of reduced redundancy principle? System 29, 209–19.Google Scholar

Babyonyshev, M., Ganger, J., Pesetsky, D., and Wexler, K.. 2001. The maturation of grammatical principles: evidence from Russian unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bach, E., Brown, C., and Marslen-Wilson, W.. 1986. Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch: a psycholinguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 249–62.Google Scholar

Backus, A. 1996. Two in One: Bilingual Speech of Turkish Immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Bae, S.-H. 2015. The Syntax–Phonology Interface in Native and Near-Native Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Bae, S.-H., Plaster, K., and Polinsky, M.. 2012. Heritage Korean. Harvard Dataverse, hdl:1902.1/18833.Google Scholar

Bailyn, J. 2014. Against a VP ellipsis account of Russian verb-stranding construction. In McClure, W. and Vovin, A. (eds.), Studies in Japanese and Korean Historical and Theoretical Linguistics and Beyond: A Festschrift to Honor Prof. John B. Whitman on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, 93–109. Leiden: Global Oriental/Brill.Google Scholar

Bak, T. H. 2016a. Cooking pasta in La Paz: bilingualism, bias and the replication crisis. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6, 699–717.Google Scholar

Bak, T. H. 2016b. The impact of bilingualism on cognitive aging and dementia: finding a path through a forest of confounding variables. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6, 205–26.Google Scholar

Baker, M. C. 2003. Lexical Categories: Nouns, Verbs, and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, M. C. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, W., and Trofimovich, P.. 2005. Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech 48, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baladzhaeva, L., and Laufer, B.. 2017. Is first language attrition possible without second language knowledge? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, June; https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-0066.Google Scholar

Barlow, J. 2014. Age of acquisition and allophony in Spanish–English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00288.Google Scholar

Barlow, J., Branson, P., and Nip, I.. 2013. Phonetic equivalence in the acquisition of /l/ by Spanish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 68–85.Google Scholar

Barnes, H. 2009. A Sociolinguistic Study of Sustained Veneto–Spanish Bilingualism in Chipilo, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar

Barnes, H. 2010a. Social motivations for sustained bilingualism in an Italo–Mexican community. In Borgonovo, C. et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 122–35. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Barnes, H. 2010b. Subject pronoun expression in bilinguals of two null subject languages. In Arregi, K. et al. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2008. Interactions in Romance: Selected Papers from the 38th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Urbana-Champaign, April 2008, 9–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 2006. Strength and Weakness at the Interface: Positional Neutralization in Phonetics and Phonology. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 2007. Phonetics and phonology in Russian unstressed vowel reduction: A study in hyperarticulation. Manuscript, Boston University.Google Scholar

Barski, E. 2017. Nominal case restructuring: a case study on a Polish heritage speaker. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 38.Google Scholar

Bates, E., and Goodman, J.. 1997. On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 12, 507–84.Google Scholar

Bates, E., Dale, P. S., and Thal, D.. 1995. Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds.), Handbook of Child Language, 96–151. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bavin, E. L., and Shopen, T.. 1985. Children’s acquisition of Warlpiri: comprehension of transitive sentences. Journal of Child Language 12, 597–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaudrie, S., and Ducar, C.. 2005. Beginning level university heritage language programs: creating a space for all heritage language learners. Heritage Language Journal 3, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaudrie, S., Ducar, C., and Potowski, K.. 2014. Heritage Language Teaching: Research and Practice. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

Behaghel, O. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25, 110–42.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., and Albirini, A.. 2018. Is learning a standard variety similar to learning a new language? Evidence from heritage speakers of Arabic. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40, 31–61.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Albirini, A., Montrul, S., and Saadah, E.. 2014. Arabic plurals and root and pattern morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4, 89–123.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013a. Heritage languages and their speakers: opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39, 129–81.Google Scholar

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013b. Defining an “ideal” heritage speaker: theoretical and methodological challenges. Reply to peer commentaries. Theoretical Linguistics 39, 259–94.Google Scholar

Benneli, B., Belacchi, C., Gini, G., and Lugangeli, D.. 2006. “To define means to say what you know about things”: the development of definitional skills as metalinguistic acquisition. Journal of Child Language 33, 71–97.Google Scholar

Benson, M. 1960. American–Russian speech. American Speech 35, 163–74.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A. 1988. Word class distinctions in developing grammars. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M., and Braine, M. D. S. (eds.), Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition, 45–72. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Berman, R. A., and Olshtain, E.. 1983. Features of first language transfer in second language attrition. Applied Linguistics 4, 222–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, R. A., and Slobin, D. I. (eds.). 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bhatia, T., and Ritchie, W. (eds.). 2013. The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bianchi, G. 2013. Gender in Italian–German bilinguals: a comparison with German L2 learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 538–57.Google Scholar

Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., and Roberts, I.. 2007. Disharmonic word-order systems and the final-over-final-constraint (FOFC). In Bisetto, A. and Barbieri, F. (eds.), Proceedings of XXXIII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 173–221.Google Scholar

Bickerton, D. 1988. Creole languages and the bioprogram. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 268–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Binnick, R. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bittner, M., and Hale, K.. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 1–68.Google Scholar

Blackwell, A., and Bates, E.. 1995. Inducing agrammatic profiles in normal: evidence for selective vulnerability of morphology under cognitive resource limitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7, 228–57.Google Scholar

Blake, R. J. 1980. The Acquisition of Mood Selection among Spanish-Speaking Children: Ages 4 to 12. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Bleam, T. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar

Bloom, L., Rispoli, M., Gartner, B., and Hafitz, J.. 2009. Acquisition of complementation. Journal of Child Language 16, 101–20.Google Scholar

Bloomfield, L. 1927. Literate and illiterate speech. American Speech 2, 432–39.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11, 131–46.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., and Kasper, G. (eds.). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. New York, NY: Ablex.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, S., and Olshtain, E.. 1984. Requests and apologies: a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5, 196–213.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. 2003. Floating quantifiers: handle with care. In Cheng, L. L. and Sybesma, R. (eds.), The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book: The Latest in Linguistics, 107–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J., and Branigan, P.. 2006. Eccentric agreement and multiple case-checking. In Johns, A., Massam, D., and Ndayiragije, J. (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging Issues, 47–77.  Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Bock, K., and Miller, C. A.. 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 2, 45–93.Google Scholar

Bock, K., Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., Meyer, A., and Schriefers, H.. 2001. Some attractions of verb agreement. Cognitive Psychology 43, 83–128.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. 2003. Islands and Chains: Resumption as Derivational Residue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., and Nunes, J.. 2008. Copy-reflexive and copy-control constructions: a movement analysis. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8, 61–100.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., and Nunes, J.. 2010. Control as Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bohman, T. M., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Mendez-Perez, A., and Gillam, R. B.. 2010. What you hear and what you say: language performance in Spanish–English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 13, 325–44.Google Scholar

Böhmer, J. 2015. Biliteralität: Eine Studie zu literaten Strukturen in Sprachproben von Jugendlichen im Deutschen und im Russischen. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, J. 2009. Temporal anaphora in a tenseless language. In Klein, W. and Li, P. (eds.), The Expression of Time in Language, 83–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolonyai, A. 2002. Case systems in contact: syntactic and lexical case in bilingual child language. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 21(2), 1–35.Google Scholar

Bolonyai, A. 2007. (In)vulnerable agreement in incomplete bilingual L1 learners. International Journal of Bilingualism 11, 3–21.Google Scholar

Boon, E. 2014. Heritage Welsh: A Study of Heritage Language As the Outcome of Minority Language Acquisition and Bilingualism. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Borer, H. 1989. Anaphoric AGR. In Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. J. (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter, 69–109, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Bossong, G. 1985. Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in der neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Bossong, G. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Wanner, D. and Kibbee, D. (eds.), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 1988, 143–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Boumans, L. 2006. The attributive possessive in Moroccan Arabic spoken by young bilinguals in the Netherlands and their peers in Morocco. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9, 213–31.Google Scholar

Bourque, F., Van der Ven, E., and Malla, A.. 2011. A meta-analysis of the risk for psychotic disorders among first- and second-generation immigrants. Psychological Medicine 41, 897–910.Google Scholar

Bowern, C. 2008. Linguistic Fieldwork: A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bowles, M. 2011. Exploring the role of modality: second language–heritage learner interactions in the Spanish language classroom. Heritage Language Journal 8, 30–65.Google Scholar

Braine, M. D. S. 1987. What is learned in acquiring word classes: a step toward an acquisition theory. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, 65–87. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Braine, M. D. S. 1988. Modeling the acquisition of linguistic structure. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M., and Braine, M. D. S. (eds.), Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition, 217–60. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Braun, B., and Tagliapietra, L.. 2010. The role of contrastive intonation contours in the retrieval of contextual alternatives. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 7–9.Google Scholar

Brehmer, B. 2007. Sprechen Sie Qwelja? Formen und Folgen russisch–deutscher Zweisprachigkeit in Deutschland. In Anstatt, T. (ed.), Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen: Erwerb, Formen, Förderung, 163–87. Tübingen: Germany Attempto.Google Scholar

Brehmer, B., and Czachór, A.. 2012. The formation and distribution of the analytic future tense in Polish–German bilinguals. In Braunmüller, K. and Gabriel, C. (eds.), Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies, 297–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Brehmer, B., and Rothweiler, M.. 2012. The acquisition of gender agreement marking in Polish: a study of bilingual Polish–German-speaking children. In Braunmüller, K. and Gabriel, C. (eds.), Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies, 81–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Brehmer, B., and Usanova, I.. 2015. Let’s fix it? Cross-linguistic influence in word order patterns of Russian heritage speakers in Germany. In Peukert, H. (ed.), Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development, 161–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., and Bauckus, S. (eds.). 2008. Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brody, M. 1990. Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 201–25.Google Scholar

Broschart, J. 1997. Why Tongan does it differently: categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 1, 123–65.Google Scholar

Brown, N. 1996. Russian Learners’ Dictionary: 10,000 Russian Words in Frequency Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brown, P., and Levinson, S.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, R., and Gilman, A.. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in Language, 253–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bruck, M., and Genesse, F.. 1995. Phonological awareness in young second language learners. Journal of Child Language 22, 307–24.Google Scholar

Bruening, B. 2013. By-phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16, 1–41.Google Scholar

Bruhn de Garavito, J. 2002. Verb raising in Spanish: a comparison of early and late bilinguals. In Skarabela, B., Fish, S., and Do, A. H.-J. (eds.), BUCLD 26: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 84–94. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar

Bullock, B., and Gerfen, C.. 2004. Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7, 95–104.Google Scholar

Burke, D. M., and Shafto, M. A.. 2004. Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13, 21–24.Google Scholar

Burt, M., and Kiparsky, C.. 1972. The Gooficon: A Repair Manual for English. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Bylund, E. 2009. Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning 59, 687–715.Google Scholar

Byrd, D. 1992. Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database. JASA 92, 593–96.Google Scholar

Cain, K., Towse, A. S., and Knight, R. S.. 2008. The development of idiom comprehension: an investigation of semantic and contextual processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102, 280–98.Google Scholar

Cairns, H. S., McDaniel, D., Ryan Hsu, J., and Rapp, M.. 1994. A longitudinal study of principles of control and pronominal reference in child English. Language 70, 260–88.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, K. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82, 32–64.Google Scholar

Candea, M., Vasilescu, I., and Adda-Decker, M.. 2005. Inter- and intra-language acoustic analysis of autonomous fillers. Paper presented at DISS 05, Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop, September 2005, Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar

Cantone, K. F. 1999. Das Genus im Italienischen und Deutschen: Empirische Untersuchung zum bilingualen Erstspracherwerb. M.A. thesis, Hamburg University.Google Scholar

Carminati, M. N. 2002. The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

Carminati, M. N. 2005. Processing reflexes of the feature hierarchy (person > number > gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua 115, 259–85.Google Scholar

Carreira, M., and Beeman, T.. 2014. Voces: Latino Students on Life in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Carvalho, A., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. (eds.). 2015. Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish: A Cross-Dialectal Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Casasanto, L. S., Hofmeister, P., and Sag, I. A.. 2010. Understanding acceptability judgments: additivity and working memory effects. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and Topic, 27–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. (ed.). 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar

Chang, C. B. 2016. Bilingual perceptual benefits of experience with a heritage language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19, 791–809.Google Scholar

Chang, C. B., and Yao, Y.. 2016. Toward an understanding of heritage prosody: acoustic and perceptual properties of tone produced by heritage, native, and second language speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal 13, 134–60.Google Scholar

Chang, C. B., Yao, Y, Haynes, E. F, and Rhodes, R.. 2011. Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 3964–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Li, Wei, et al. 2004. Phonological awareness of bilingual and monolingual Chinese children. Journal of Educational Psychology 96, 142–51.Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Xu, Y., and Guion-Anderson, S.. 2014. Prosodic realization of focus in bilingual production of Southern Min and Mandarin. Phonetica 71, 249–70.Google Scholar

Cheng, L. L.-S. 1997. On the Typology of Wh-Questions. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar

Cho, S. W. 1989. Parameter, subset principle, and the acquisition of the Korean reflexive pronoun. In Proceedings for the Cognitive Science Conference, Seoul, Korea, 1989, 296–301. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar

Cho, S. W. 1992. The syntax and acquisition of “kyay” (“s/he”) and “caki” (“self”). Studies in Generative Grammar 4, 361–92.Google Scholar

Choi, H.-W. 1999. Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Choi, H.-W. 2003. Paradigm leveling in American Korean. Language Research 39, 183–204.Google Scholar

Choi, K.-I., and Kim, Y.-J.. 2007. Caykwitaymyengsa-uy tauyseng hayso-kwaceng: Ankwu-wuntong pwunsek [Ambiguity resolution processes of reflexives: eye-tracking data]. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology 19, 263–77.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184–221. Boston, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Martin, R. et al. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chondrogianni, V., and Marinis, T.. 2011. Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 223–48.Google Scholar

Clark, H. H., and Fox Tree, J. E.. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84, 73–111.Google Scholar

Cleary, C. 1988. The C-test in English: left-hand deletions. Regional English Language Centre Journal 19(2), 26–38.Google Scholar

Clyne, M. 2003. Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cojtí Cuxil, D. 2012. El desarrollo socioeconómico contra el desarrollo de los idiomas indígenas. In STILLA-2011 Proceedings, 183–205. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar

Colantoni, L., Cuza, A., and Mazzaro, N.. 2016. Task related effects in the prosody of Spanish heritage speakers and long-term immigrants. In Armstrong, M. E., Henriksen, N., and del Mar Vanrell, M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cole, P., Hermon, G., and Huang, C.-T. J.. 2001. Introduction: Long-distance reflexives: the state of the art. In Cole, P., Hermon, G., and Huang, C.-T. J. (eds.), Long-Distance Reflexives (Syntax and Semantics 33), xxiii–xlvii. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Collentine, J. G. 2003. Development of subjunctive and complex-syntactic abilities among foreign language learners of Spanish. In Lafford, B. and Salaberry, R. (eds.), Studies in Spanish Second Language Acquisition: The State of the Science, 74–97. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, B., and Kuteva, T.. 2013. Relativization on subjects. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology; available online at http://wals.info/chapter/122 (accessed August 23, 2017).Google Scholar

Contreras, H. 1987. Small clauses in Spanish and English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 225–43.Google Scholar

Cook, V. 1991. The poverty of the stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research 7, 103–17.Google Scholar

Cook, V. 1992. Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning 42, 557–91.Google Scholar

Cook, V. 1997. Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 34, 35–50.Google Scholar

Cook, V. (ed.). 2003. Effects of the Second Language on the First. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Coon, J. 2016. Mayan morphosyntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 10, 515–50.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. 1979. Variable binding and relative clauses. In Guenthner, F. and Schmidt, S. J. (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, 131–69. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. 1982. Gender in Russian: an account of gender specification and its relationship to declension. Russian Linguistics 6, 197–232.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbett, G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corder, P. 1967. The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5, 161–70.Google Scholar

Cowart, W. 1997. Experimental Syntax. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Cozens, S. 2003. Heritage learners in the Polish language classroom. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies 17, 27–45.Google Scholar

Craig, C. 1979. The antipassive and Jacaltec. In Martin, L. (ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, 139–65. Colombia, MO: Lucas Bros. Publishers.Google Scholar

Crain, S. 2013. What’s parsing got to do with it? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3, 301–7.Google Scholar

Crain, S., and Thornton, R.. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Research on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., et al. 1996. Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition 5, 83–153.Google Scholar

Croft, W. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Csernicskó, I. 2005. Hungarian in Ukraine. In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 89–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. 1978. Bilingualism and the development of metalinguistic awareness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 9, 131–49.Google Scholar

Cummins, J. 1991. Introduction. The Canadian Modern Language Review 47, 601–5.Google Scholar

Cuza, A. 2012. Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax proper: interrogative subject–verb inversion in heritage Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 17, 71–96.Google Scholar

Cuza, A., and Frank, J.. 2011. Transfer effects at the syntax–semantics interface: the case of double que questions in heritage Spanish. Heritage Language Journal 8, 66–89.Google Scholar

Cuza, A., and Frank, J.. 2015. On the role of experience and age-related effects: evidence from the Spanish CP. Second Language Research 31, 3–28.Google Scholar

Cuza, A., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., and Sánchez, L.. 2013. The role of semantic transfer in clitic drop among simultaneous and sequential Chinese–Spanish bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, 93–125.Google Scholar

Cuza, A., and Pérez-Tattam, R.. 2012. Grammatical gender selection and phrasal word order in the grammar of Spanish/English bilingual children. Paper presented at Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL42), Southern Utah University.Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, E. 1997. The LAD goes to school: a cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics 35, 735–66.Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, E. 2012. Different speakers, different grammars: individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2, 219–53.Google Scholar

Dagut, M., and Laufer, B.. 1985. Avoidance of phrasal verbs: a case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 73–79.Google Scholar

Dal Pozzo, L. 2015. New Information Subjects in L2 Acquisition: Evidence from Italian and Finnish. Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar

Daller, M., Yildiz, C., De Jong, N., Kan, S., and Basbagi, R.. 2011. Language dominance in Turkish German bilinguals: methodological aspects of measurements in structurally different languages. International Journal of Bilingualism 15, 215–36.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. E., and Lekic, M.. 2013. The heritage and non-heritage learner in the overseas immersion context: comparing learning outcomes and target-language utilization in the Russian flagship. Heritage Language Journal 10(2), 88–114.Google Scholar

Davidson, L. 2011. Characteristics of stop releases in American English spontaneous speech. Speech Communication 53, 1042–58.Google Scholar

Davis, H., and Huijsmans, M.. 2017. Changes in the alignment of arguments in transitive clauses in ʔayʔaǰuθəm (Comox-Sliammon). In Anghelescu, A., Fry, M., Huijsmans, M., and Reisinger, D. (eds.), Papers for the International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages 52 (University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 45), 13–46. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Dawsey, C. B., and Dawsey, J. M. (eds.). 1995. The Confederados: Old South Immigrants in Brazil. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar

de Bot, K. 1990. Language attrition, competence loss or performance loss. In Spillner, B. (ed.), Sprache und Politik: Kongreßbeiträge zur 19. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Angewandte Linguistik, 63–65. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Déchaine, R.-M. 1993. Predicates Across Categories: Towards a Category-Neutral Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.Google Scholar

Déchaine, R.-M., and Wiltschko, M.. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 409–42.Google Scholar

de Groot, C. 2005. The grammars of Hungarian outside Hungary from a linguistic-typological perspective. In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 351–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

de Houwer, A. 1990. The Acquisition of Two Languages from Birth: A Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Houwer, A. 2011. Language input environments and language development in bilingual acquisition. Applied Linguistics Review 2, 221–40.Google Scholar

de Houwer, A. 2014. The absolute frequency of maternal input to bilingual and monolingual children: a first comparison. In Grüter, T. and Paradis, J. (eds.), Input and Experience in Bilingual Development, 37–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

De Jong, N., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., and Hulstijn, J.. 2013. Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 34, 893–916.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. 2015. Skill acquisition theory. In Williams, J. and VanPatten, B. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 94–112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. 2017. Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 15–32. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

DeLancey, S. 1997. Mirativity: the grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1, 33–52.Google Scholar

DeLancey, S. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 369–82.Google Scholar

Denisova-Schmidt, E. 2014. Heritage Russian: Germany. Harvard Dataverse, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/26350.Google Scholar

de Prada Pérez, A. 2009. Subject Expression in Minorcan Spanish: Consequences of Contact with Catalan. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar

de Prada Pérez, A., and Pascual y Cabo, D.. 2011. Invariable gusta in the Spanish of heritage speakers in the US. In Herschensohn, J. and Tanner, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2011), 110–20. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

de Prada Pérez, A., and Pascual y Cabo, D.. 2012. Interface heritage speech across proficiencies: unaccusativity, focus, and subject position in Spanish. In Geeslin, K. and Díaz-Campos, M. (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 308–18. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar

Dieser, E. 2007. Osvojenije kategorii roda v ramkax detskogo dvu-/trexjazyčija. In Ceytlin, S. N. (ed.), Semantičeskije kategorii v detskoj reči, 244–63. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija.Google Scholar

Dieser, E. 2009. Genuserwerb im Russischen und Deutschen. Korpusgestützte Studie zu ein- und zweisprachigen Kindern und Erwachsenen. München: Kubon & Sagner.Google Scholar

Dixon, L. Q., Zhao, J., Quiroz, B. G., and Shin, J.. 2012. Home and community factors influencing bilingual children’s ethnic language vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism 16, 541–65.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 1994. The Syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Doetjes, J. S. 1992. Rightward floating quantifiers float to the left. Linguistic Review 9, 313–39.Google Scholar

Doetjes, J. S. 1995. Quantification at a distance and iteration. In Beckman, J. (ed.), The Proceedings of NELS 25, 111–26. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar

Dogruöz, S., and Backus, A.. 2009. Innovative constructions in Dutch Turkish: an assessment of on-going contact-induces change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 41–64.Google Scholar

Döpke, S. 1998. Competing language structures: the acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Journal of Child Language 25, 555–84.Google Scholar

Dorian, N. 1981. Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., and Katona, L.. 1992. Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners. Language Testing 9, 187–206.Google Scholar

Druks, J. 2002. Verbs and nouns: a review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics 15, 289–315.Google Scholar

Dubinina, I. 2010. How to ask for a favor: a pilot study in heritage Russian pragmatics. In Mustajoki, A., Protassova, E., and Vakhtin, N. (eds.), Instrumentarium of Linguistics: Sociolinguistic Approaches to Non-Standard Russian (Slavica Helsingiensia 40), 418–30. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press.Google Scholar

Dubinina, I., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Russian in the USA. In Moser, M. and Polinsky, M. (eds.), Slavic Languages in Migration, 131–60. Wien: University of Vienna.Google Scholar

Duchin, S. W., and Mysak, E. D.. 1987. Disfluency and rate characteristics of young adult, middle-aged, and older males. Journal of Communicative Disorders 20, 245–57.Google Scholar

Duffield, N. 2018. Reflections on Psycholinguistic Theories: Raiding the Inarticulate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, A., and Fox Tree, J. E.. 2009. A quick, gradient bilingual dominance scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 273–89.Google Scholar

Dunn, L. M., and Dunn, D. M.. 1997. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 3rd edn. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar

Dunn, M. J. 1999. A Grammar of Chukchi. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Duursma, E., Romero-Contreras, S., Szuber, A., et al. 2007. The role of home literacy and language environment on bilinguals’ English and Spanish vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 171–90.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 453–76.Google Scholar

Eckes, E., and Grotjahn, R.. 2006. A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing 23, 290–325.Google Scholar

Ehresmann, T., and Bousquette, J.. 2015. Phonological non-integration of lexical borrowings in Wisconsin West Frisian. In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 234–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Eide, K. M., and Hjelde, A.. 2015. Borrowing modal elements into American Norwegian: the case of suppose(d). In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 256–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

El Aissati, A., and Schaufeli, A.. 1999. Language maintenance and loss: evidence from language perception and production. In Extra, G. and Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Bilingualism and Migration, 363–78. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 1991. Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, 161–86.Google Scholar

England, N. C. 2003. Mayan language revival and revitalization politics: linguists and linguistic ideologies. American Anthropologist 105, 733–43.Google Scholar

Eubank, L., Bischof, J., Huffstutler, A., Leek, P., and West, C.. 1997. “Tom eats slowly cooked eggs”: thematic-verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition 6, 171–99.Google Scholar

Evans, N. 1995. A Grammar of Kayardild: With Historical-Comparative Notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ewen, C., and van der Hulst, H.. 2001. The Phonological Structure of Words: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fairclough, M. 2006. Language placement exams for heritage speakers of Spanish: learning from students’ mistakes. Foreign Language Annals 39, 595–604.Google Scholar

Fairclough, M. 2011. Testing the lexical recognition task with Spanish/English bilinguals in the United States. Language Testing 28, 273–97.Google Scholar

Fairclough, M. 2012. A working model for assessing Spanish heritage language learners’ language proficiency through a placement exam. Heritage Language Journal 9(1), 121–38.Google Scholar

Fairclough, M., and Beaudrie, S. (eds.). 2016. Innovative Strategies for Heritage Language Teaching: A Practical Guide for the Classroom. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Fallon, P. D. 2002. Phonology of Ejectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Farkas, D. 1978. Direct and indirect object reduplication in Rumanian. In Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 14), 88–97. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Farkas, D. 2002. Specificity distinction. Journal of Semantics 19, 213–43.Google Scholar

Fenyvesi, A. 1996. The case of American Hungarian case: morphological change in McKeesport, PA. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 43, 381–404.Google Scholar

Fenyvesi, A. 2000. The affectedness of the verbal complex in American Hungarian. In Fenyvesi, A. and Sándor, K. (eds.), Language Contact and the Verbal Complex of Dutch and Hungarian: Working Papers from the 1st Bilingual Language Use Theme Meeting of the Study Centre on Language Contact, November 11–13, 1999, Szeged, Hungary, 94–107. Szeged: Teacher Training College.Google Scholar

Fenyvesi, A. 2005a. Hungarian in the United States. In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 265–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fenyvesi, A. (ed.). 2005b. Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fernald, A., and Marchman, V.. 2012. Individual differences in lexical processing at 18 months predict vocabulary growth in typically-developing and late-talking toddlers. Child Development 83, 203–22.Google Scholar

Fernández Soriano, O. 1989. Strong pronouns in null subject languages and the Avoid Pronoun Principle. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 228–39.Google Scholar

Ferreira, F. 2003. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47, 164–203.Google Scholar

Ferreira, F., and Swets, B. 2005. The production and comprehension of resumptive pronouns in relative clause “island” contexts. In Cutler, A. (ed.), Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones, 263–78. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Féry, C. 2007. The prosody of topicalization. In Schwabe, K. and Winkler, S. (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form: Generalizations across Languages, 69–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Féry, C. 2011. German sentence accents and embedded prosodic phrases. Lingua 121, 1906–22.Google Scholar

Filip, H. 1999. Aspect, Eventuality Types and Noun Phrase Semantics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Filip, H. 2004. Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 12, 55–101.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. 2001. 300-plus years of heritage language education in the United States. In Peyton, J. K. et al. (eds.), Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource, 81–98. Washington, DC: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Flege, J. 1987. The instrumental study of L2 speech production: some methodological considerations. Language Learning 37, 285–96.Google Scholar

Flege, J. 2007. Language contact in bilingualism: phonetic system interactions. Laboratory Phonology 9, 354–81.Google Scholar

Flege, J., and Eefting, W.. 1986. Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica 43, 155–71.Google Scholar

Flege, J., and Eefting, W.. 1987. Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics 15, 67–83.Google Scholar

Flege, J., and Eefting, W.. 1988. Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83, 729–40.Google Scholar

Flege, J., Frieda, E., and Nozawa, T.. 1997. Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics 25, 169–86.Google Scholar

Flege, J., Yeni-Komshian, G., and Liu, S. H.. 1999. Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 78–104.Google Scholar

Fleischer, J., Rieken, E., and Widmer, P. (eds.). 2015. Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Flores, C. M. M. 2010. The effect of age on language attrition: evidence from bilingual returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13, 533–46.Google Scholar

Flores, C. M. M. 2012. Differential effects of language attrition in the domains of verb placement and object expression. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 550–67.Google Scholar

Flores, C. M. M. 2015a. Losing a language in childhood: a longitudinal case study on language attrition. Journal of Child Language 42, 562–90.Google Scholar

Flores, C. M. M. 2015b. Understanding heritage language acquisition: some contributions from the research on heritage speakers of European Portuguese. Lingua 164, 251–65.Google Scholar

Flores, C. M. M. 2016. Portugiesisch als Herkunftssprache. Deutsch als Umgebungssprache. Anmerkungen zum Erwerb der Familiensprache in einem Migrationskontext. In Born, J. and Ladoliva, A. (eds.), Sprachkontakte des Portugiesischen, 45–65. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Flores, C. M. M., and Barbosa, P.. 2014. When reduced input leads to delayed acquisition: a study on the acquisition of clitic placement by Portuguese heritage speaker. International Journal of Bilingualism 8, 304–25.Google Scholar

Flores, C. M. M., Kupisch, T., and Rinke, E.. 2016. Linguistic foundations of heritage language development from the perspective of Romance languages in Germany. In Trifonas, P. P. and Aravossitas, T. (eds.), Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education, 1–18. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Floyd, M. B. 1990. Development of subjunctive mood in children’s Spanish: a review. Confluencia 5, 93–104.Google Scholar

Forsyth, J. 1970. A Grammar of Aspect: Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fotopoulou, G. 2004. Code-Switching In the Case of 2nd Generation Greek-German Bilinguals in Germany: An Empirical Study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Fowler, C., Sramko, V., Ostry, D., Rowland, S., and Hallé, P.. 2008. Cross-language phonetic influences on the speech of French–English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 36, 649–63.Google Scholar

Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., and Rizzi, L.. 2006. Agreement and movement: a syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition 101, 173–216.Google Scholar

Frank, J. 2013. Derivational complexity effects in bilingual adults: instances of interrogative inversion in Spanish. In Aaron, J., Cabrelli Amaro, J., Lord, G., and de Prada Pérez, A. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 143–55. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar

Franks, S. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fraundorf, S. H., Watson, D. G., and Benjamin, A. S.. 2010. Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is. Journal of Memory and Language 63, 367–86.Google Scholar

French, B. 2010. Maya Ethnolinguistic Identity: Violence, Cultural Rights, and Modernity in Highland Guatemala. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Freywald, U., Mayr, K., Özçelik, T., and Wiese, H.. 2011. Kiezdeutsch as a multiethnolect. In Kern, F. and Selting, M. (eds.), Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas, 45–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Frommer, J. G., and Ishikawa, W.. 1980. Alors … euh … on parle français. French Review 53, 501–6.Google Scholar

Fruehwald, J. 2016. Filled pause choice as a sociolinguistic variable. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 2(6), 40–49.Google Scholar

Fry, J. 2003. Ellipsis and Wa-Marking in Japanese Conversation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, M., and Scontras, G.. 2015. The differential representation of number and gender in Spanish. Linguistic Review 32, 703–37.Google Scholar

Fukuda, S. 2008. Backward control. Language and Linguistics Compass 2, 168–95.Google Scholar

Fukuda, S. 2017. Floating numeral quantifiers as an unaccusative diagnostic in native, heritage and L2 Japanese speakers. Language Acquisition 24, 169–208.Google Scholar

Fung, R. S.-Y. 2000. Final Particles in Standard Cantonese: Semantic Extension and Pragmatic Inference. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Gagarina, N., and Voeikova, M.. 2009. The acquisition of case and number in Russian. In Stephany, U. and Voeikova, M. (eds.), Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 179–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, A. 2012. Input and Intake in Language Acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Galambos, S. J., and Goldin-Meadow, S.. 1990. The effects of learning two languages on levels of metalinguistic awareness. Cognition 34, 1–56.Google Scholar

García-Mayo, M., and Hawkins, R.. 2009. Second Language Acquisition of Articles: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Garzon, S. S., McKenna Brown, R., Becker Richards, J., and Ajpub’, Wuqu’. 1998. The Life of Our Language: Kaqchikel Maya Maintenance, Shift, and Revitalization. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Gass, S. 1983. The development of L2 intuitions. Tesol Quarterly 17, 273–91.Google Scholar

Gass, S., and Selinker, L.. 1992. Language Transfer in Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gathercole, S. E., Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., and Peaker, S.. 1999. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25, 84–95.Google Scholar

Gathercole, V. C. M., and Thomas, E. M.. 2007. Factors contributing to language transmission in bilingual families: The core study—adult interviews. In Gathercole, V. C. M. (ed.), Language Transmission in Bilingual Families in Wales, 59–181. Cardiff: Welsh Language Board.Google Scholar

Gathercole, V. C. M., and Thomas, E. M.. 2009. Bilingual first-language development: dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 213–37.Google Scholar

Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I. 2000. “I want a chimney builden”: the acquisition of infinitival constructions in bilingual children. In Döpke, S. (ed.), Cross-linguistic Structures in Simultaneous Bilingualism, 123–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Genesee, F., and Nicoladis, E. 2006. Bilingual acquisition: bilingual first language acquisition. In Hoff, E. and Shatz, M. (eds.), Handbook of Language Development, 324–42. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gentner, D. 1981. Some interesting differences between nouns and verbs. Cognition and Brain Theory 4, 161–78.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. 2001. Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol 16, 317–33.Google Scholar

Gibbs, R. 2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 457–86.Google Scholar

Gibson, E. 1998. Syntactic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 1–76.Google Scholar

Gilbert, G. 1972. Linguistic Atlas of Texas German. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Gilkerson, J. S. 2006. Acquiring English Particle Verbs: Age and Transfer Effects in Second Language Acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar

Gittelson, B., and Polinsky, M.. 2012. Heritage English: France. Harvard Dataverse, hdl:1902.1/18537.Google Scholar

Godson, L. 2003. Phonetics of Language Attrition: Vowel Production and Articulatory Setting in the Speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California San Diego.Google Scholar

Godson, L. 2004. Vowel production in the speech of Western Armenian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal 2, 1–22.Google Scholar

Goodall, G. 1993. On сase and the passive morpheme. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 31–44.Google Scholar

Goodall, G. 1999. Passives and arbitrary plural subjects in Spanish. In Authier, J.-M., Bullock, B., and Reed, L. (eds.), Formal Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Papers from the 28th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 135–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Golla, V. 2007. North America. In Moseley, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the World’s Endangered Languages, 1–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Göncz, L., and Vörös, O.. 2005. Hungarian in the former Yugoslavia (Vojvodina and Prekmurje). In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 187–240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

González-Vilbazo, K., Bartlett, L., Downey, S., et al. 2015. Methodological considerations in code-switching research. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 6, 119–38.Google Scholar

Gor, K. 2014. Raspberry, not a car: context predictability and a phonological advantage in early and late learners’ processing speech in noise. Frontiers in Psychology 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01449.Google Scholar

Gribanova, V. 2013. A new argument for verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44, 145–57.Google Scholar

Grodner, D., and Gibson, E.. 2005. Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity. Cognitive Science 29, 261–90.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. 2010. Bilingual: Life and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grotjahn, R. 1987. How to construct and evaluate a C-test: a discussion of some problems and some statistical analyses. In Grotjahn, R., Klein-Braley, C., and Stevenson, D. K. (eds.), Taking Their Measure: The Validity and Validation of Language Tests, 219–53. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Grotjahn, R., Klein-Braley, C., and Raatz, U.. 2002. C-tests: an overview. In Coleman, J., Grotjahn, R., and Raatz, U. (eds.), University Language Testing and the C-Test, 93–114. Bochum: AKS-Verlag.Google Scholar

Guasti, M.-T. 2017. Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guion, S. G. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua–Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica 60, 98–128.Google Scholar

Gundel, J. K. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E., and Wirth, J. (eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology, 209–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gupol, O. 2009. The Acquisition of Russian Verbal Morphosyntax in Russian–Hebrew Bilingual Children. Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.Google Scholar

Gupol, O., Rothstein, S., and Armon-Lotem, S.. 2012. The development of L1 Russian tense-aspect morphology in Russian–Hebrew sequential bilinguals. In Labeau, E. and Saddour, I. (eds.), Tense, Aspect and Mood in First and Second Language Acquisition, 73–106. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Gussmann, E. 2007. The Phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gut, U. 2000. Cross-linguistic structures in the acquisition of intonational phonology by German–English bilingual children. In Döpke, S. (ed.), Cross-Linguistic Structures in Simultaneous Bilingualism, 201–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gutièrrez-Bravo, R. 2005. Subject inversion in Spanish relative clauses a case of prosody-induced word order variation without narrow focus. In Geerts, T., van Ginneken, I., and Jacobs, H. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” 2003, Nijmegen, 20–22 November, 115–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gvozdev, A. N. 1961. Voprosy izučenija detskoj reči. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii pedagogičeskix nauk RSFSR.Google Scholar

Haddad, Y. 2009. Copy control in Telugu. Journal of Linguistics 45, 69–109.Google Scholar

Haiman, J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59, 781–819.Google Scholar

Håkansson, G. 1995. Syntax and morphology in language attrition: a study of five bilingual expatriate Swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5, 153–71.Google Scholar

Halmari, H. 1997. Government and Codeswitching: Explaining American Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Halmari, H. 2005. “I’m forgetting both”: L1 maintenance and codeswitching in Finnish–English language contact. International Journal of Bilingualism 9, 397–433.Google Scholar

Harves, S. 2013. The genitive of negation in Russian. Language and Linguistics Compass 7, 647–62.Google Scholar

Harley, H., and Ritter, E.. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78, 482–526.Google Scholar

Han, C.-H., and Lee, C.. 2007. On negative imperatives in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 373–95.Google Scholar

Hasselmo, N. 1961. American Swedish: A Study in Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hasselmo, N. 1974. Amerikasvenska: En bok om språkutvecklingen i Svensk-Amerika. Stockholm: Esselte Stadium.Google Scholar

Haugen, E. 1953. The Norwegian Language in America, vol. 1: The Bilingual Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Haugen, E. 1987. Blessings of Babel: Bilingualism and Language Planning, Problems and Pleasures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

He, A. W. 2011. Heritage language socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization, 587–609. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

He, A. W. 2012. “Do I really have to?”: The give-and-take of deontic meaning in Chinese. In Kádár, D. and Pan, Yuling (eds.), Chinese Discourse and Interaction, 68–87. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

He, A. W. 2014. Identity construction throughout the life cycle. In Wiley, T., Peyton, J. K., Christian, D., Moore, S., and Liu, N. (eds.), Handbook of Heritage and Community Languages in the United States: Research, Educational Practice, and Policy, 324–32. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

He, A. W. 2015. Literacy, creativity, and continuity: a language socialization perspective on heritage language classroom interaction. In Markee, N. (ed.), Handbook of Classroom Interaction, 304–18. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

He, A. W. 2016. Across generations and geographies: communication in Chinese heritage language speaking households. In Wei, Li (ed.), Multilingualism in the Chinese Diaspora Worldwide, 293–311. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hendery, R. 2012. Relative Clauses in Time and Space: A Case Study in the Methods of Diachronic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., and Norenzayan, A.. 2010. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 61–135.Google Scholar

Heycock, C. 2008. Japanese -wa, -ga, and information structure. In Miyagawa, S. and Saito, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Japanese linguistics, 54–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hirsch, C. 2011. The Acquisition of Raising. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Hirsch, C., and Wexler, K.. 2006. Children’s passives and their resulting interpretation. In Ud Deen, K. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), 125–36. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Press.Google Scholar

Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., et al. 2012. Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language 39, 1–27.Google Scholar

Hoji, H. 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structure in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar

Hoot, B. 2012. Presentational Focus in Heritage and Monolingual Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar

Hoji, H. 2017. Narrow presentational focus in heritage Spanish and the syntax–discourse interface. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7, 63–95.Google Scholar

Hornstein, N. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 69–96.Google Scholar

Horvath, J. 1986. FOCUS in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Horvath, J. 2005. Is “focus movement” driven by stress? In Piñon, C. and Siptár, P. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian, vol. 9, 131–58. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadό.Google Scholar

Horvath, J. 2010. “Discourse-features,” syntactic displacement and the status of contrast. Lingua 120, 1346–69.Google Scholar

Hua, Z. 2002. Phonological Development in Specific Contexts: Studies of Chinese-Speaking Children. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hua, Z. and Dodd, B.. 2000. The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (modern standard Chinese). Journal of Child Language 27, 3–42.Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. J. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–74.Google Scholar

Hudson Kam, C. L. 2015. The impact of conditioning variables on the acquisition of variation in adult and child learners. Language 91, 906–37.Google Scholar

Huffines, M. K. 1987. The dative case in Pennsylvania German: diverging norms in language maintenance and loss. Yearbook of German–American Studies 22, 173.Google Scholar

Hulk, A., and Müller, N.. 2000. Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3, 227–44.Google Scholar

Hulsen, M. 2000. Language Loss and Language Processing: Three Generations of Dutch Migrants in New Zealand. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar

Iatridou, S. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 231–70.Google Scholar

Ionin, T., Ko, H., and Wexler, K.. 2004. Article semantics in L2 acquisition: the role of specificity. Language Acquisition 12, 3–69.Google Scholar

Irizarri van Suchtelen, P. 2014. Maintained and acquired heritage Spanish in the Netherlands: the case of dative constructions. Applied Linguistics Review 5, 375–400.Google Scholar

Irrizari van Suchtelen, P. 2016. Spanish as a Heritage Language in the Netherlands: A Cognitive Linguistic Exploration. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Isurin, L., and Ivanova-Sullivan, T.. 2008. Lost in between: the case of Russian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal 6, 72–103.Google Scholar

Ito, K., and Speer, S. R.. 2008. Anticipatory effects of intonation: eye movements during instructed visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 541–73.Google Scholar

Ivanova-Sullivan, T. 2013. Heritage Russian. Harvard Dataverse, hdl:1902.1/19792.Google Scholar

Ivanova-Sullivan, T. 2014. Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of Syntax–Discourse Interface in Heritage Grammars. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 21–35.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 2002a. English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. In Dehé, N., Jackendoff, R., McIntyre, A., and Urban, S. (eds.), Verb-particle Explorations, 67–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Jackendoff, R. 2002b. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jafarpur, A. 1995. Is C-testing superior to cloze? Language Testing 12, 194–216.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1932/1971. Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Selected Writings of Roman Jakobson, vol. 2: Word and Language, 3–15. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1968. Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

James, D. 1982. Past tense and the hypothetical: a cross-linguistic study. Studies in Language 6, 375–403.Google Scholar

Jannedy, S., and Weirich, M.. 2014. Perceptual divergence in an urban setting: category instability of the palatal fricative. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 5, 91–122.Google Scholar

Jannedy, S., Weirich, M., and Wagner, L.. 2015. Acoustic analyses of differences in [ç] and [ʃ] productions in Hood German. In XVIII ICPhS, Glasgow. Glasgow: University of Glasgow Press.Google Scholar

Janse, M. 2004. Animacy, definiteness and case in Cappadocian and other Asia Minor Greek dialects. Journal of Greek Linguistics 5, 3–26.Google Scholar

Jarayapun, J. 2015. Language Teacher Identity Negotiation: A Case Study of a Heritage Thai Language Class in a Thai Buddhist School in the United States. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. 1998. Conceptual Transfer in the Interlingual Lexicon. Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications.Google Scholar

Jegerski, J., and Ponti, E.. 2014. Peer review among students of Spanish as a heritage language: the effectiveness of a metalinguistic literacy task. Linguistics and Education 26, 70–82.Google Scholar

Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., and Tomita, Y.. 2007. Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes 64, 215–20.Google Scholar

Jia, L., and Bailey, R.. 2008. The (re)acquisition of perfective aspect marking by Chinese heritage language learners. In He, A.W. and Xiao, Yun (eds.), Chinese as a Heritage Language: Fostering Rooted World Citizenry, 205–24. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.Google Scholar

Jiménez-Fernández, Á., and Spyropoulos, V.. 2013. Feature inheritance, vP phrases and the information structure of small clauses. Studia Linguistica 67, 185–224.Google Scholar

Johannessen, J. B. 2015. Attrition in an American Norwegian heritage language speaker. In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 46–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Johannessen, J. B., and Laake, S.. 2015. On two myths of the Norwegian language in America: Is it old-fashioned? Is it approaching the written Bokmål standard? In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 299–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Johanson, L. 1998. Code copying in Irano-Turkic. Language Sciences 20, 325–37.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. S. 1992. Critical period effects in second language acquisition: the effect of written versus auditory materials on the assessment of grammatical competence. Language Learning 42, 217–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, J. S., Shenkman, K. D., Newport, E. L., and Medin, D. L.. 1996. Indeterminacy in the grammar of adult language learners. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 335–52.Google Scholar

Joshi, A. 1989. Processing Crossed and Nested Dependencies: An Automaton Perspective on the Psycholinguistic Results, University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science Technical Report No. MS-CIS-89–58, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Juffs, A., and Harrington, M.. 1996. Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning 46, 283–326.Google Scholar

Jun, S.-A. 1996. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean: Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Structure. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Kádár, D., and Haugh, M.. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kagan, O., Carreira, M., and Chik, C. (eds.). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Heritage Language Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kagan, O., and Friedman, D.. 2003. Using the OPI to place heritage speakers of Russian. Foreign Language Annals 36, 536–46.Google Scholar

Kang, B.-M. 1998a. Mwunpep-kwa ene sayong: Khophes-ey kipanhan caykwisa “caki,” “casin,” “caki-casin”-uy kinung pwunsek-ul cwungsim-ulo [Grammar and the use of language: Korean reflexives “caki,” “casin,” and “caki-casin”]. Kwuk-e-hak 31, 165–204.Google Scholar

Kang, B.-M. 1998b. Three kinds of Korean reflexives: a corpus linguistic investigation on grammar and usage. In Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC12), 10–19.Google Scholar

Kang, B.-M. 2002. Categories and meanings of Korean floating quantifiers: with some reference to Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 375–98.Google Scholar

Kang, S.-G. 2011. English Attrition in Korean–English Bilingual Children. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Mānoa.Google Scholar

Kang, H.-S., and Kim, I.-S.. 2012. Perceived and actual competence and ethnic identity in heritage language learning: a case of Korean–American college students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15, 279–94.Google Scholar

Kang, K.-H., and Guion, S.. 2006. Phonological systems in bilinguals: age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean–English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119, 1672–83.Google Scholar

Kang, Y., and Nagy, N.. 2012. VOT merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–15. Toronto: Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar

Kang, Y., and Nagy, N.. 2016. VOT merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. Language Variation and Change 28, 249–72.Google Scholar

Karimi, H., and Ferreira, F.. 2016. Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69, 1013–40.Google Scholar

Karimi, S. 2003. Focus movement and uninterpretable features. In Carnie, A., Harley, H., and Willie, M. (eds.), Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar. Festschrift for Eloise Jelinek, 297–306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1981. A Functional Approach to Child Language: A Study of Determiners and Reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, D., and Aronoff, M.. 1991. Morphological disintegration and reconstruction in first language attrition. In Seliger, H. W. and Vago, R. M. (eds.), First Language Attrition, 175–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, T. 1990. Algunos rasgos estructurales de los idiomas mayances con referencia especial al K’iche’. In England, N. C. and Elliot, S. R. (eds.), Lecturas sobre la linguïstica maya, 59–114. Antigua: CIRMA.Google Scholar

Kayam, O. 2013. Heritage language maintenance among native English speakers living in Israel. Journal of Sociological Research 4(2), 308–17.Google Scholar

Kayam, O., and Hirsch, T.. 2013. Israel’s English speaking immigrant parents’ family language policy management: language in the education domain. International Journal of Linguistics 5(1), 320–31.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax: The transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–86.Google Scholar

Keating, G. D., Jegerski, J., and VanPatten, B.. 2016. Online processing of subject pronouns in monolingual and heritage bilingual speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19, 36–49.Google Scholar

Keating, G. D., VanPatten, B., and Jegerski, J.. 2011. Who was walking on the beach? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 193–221.Google Scholar

Keen, S. 1983. Yukulta. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, B. J. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, 190–301. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar

Keenan, E. L., and Comrie, B.. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 63–99.Google Scholar

Keffala, B. 2011. Resumption and gaps in English relative clauses: Relative acceptability creates an illusion of “saving.” In Cathcart, C., Chen, I. H., Finley, G., et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 140–54. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Keijzer, M. 2004. First language attrition: A cross-linguistic investigation of Jakobson’s regression hypothesis. International Journal of Bilingualism 8, 389–93.Google Scholar

Kemper, S., Thompson, M., and Marquis, J.. 2001. Longitudinal change in language production: effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content. Psychology and Aging 16, 600–14.Google Scholar

Kempler, D., Van Lancker, D., Marchman, V., and Bates, E.. 1999. Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral damage. Developmental Neuropsychology 15, 327–49.Google Scholar

Kerswill, P. 2002. Koineization and accommodation. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., and Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 669–702. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar