Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-mpxzb Total loading time: 2.544 Render date: 2023-01-29T20:11:46.823Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2018

Maria Polinsky
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abkarian, G. G., Jones, A., and West, G.. 1992. Young children’s idiom comprehension: trying to get the picture. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 35, 580–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aboh, E., and DeGraff, M.. 2016. A null theory of creole formation based on universal grammar. In Roberts, I. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar, 401–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abouguendia, M., and Noels, K. A.. 2001. General and acculturation-related daily hassles and psychological adjustment in first- and second-generation South Asian immigrants to Canada. International Journal of Psychology 36, 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., and Hyltenstam, K.. 2008. The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, 481509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., and Hyltenstam, K.. 2009. Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59, 249306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abutalebi, J., and Green, D. W.. 2007. Bilingual language production: the neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 20, 242–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, J. 1994. Tzotzil auxiliaries. Linguistics 32, 657–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, J. 2003. Differential object marking: iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, J., England, N. C., and Zavala Maldonado, R.. 2017. Introduction. In Aissen, J., England, N. C., and Zavala Maldonado, R. (eds.), Mayan Languages, 118. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. 1994. Development of linguistic forms: Turkish. In Berman, R. A. and Slobin, D. I. (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study, 329–88. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A., and Slobin, D. I.. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe, W. and Nichols, J. (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 159–67. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Albirini, A., and Benmamoun, E.. 2014a. Concatenative and nonconcatenative plural formation in L1, L2, and heritage speakers of Arabic. Modern Language Journal 98, 854–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A., and Benmamoun, E.. 2014b. Aspects of second language transfer in the oral production of Egyptian and Palestinian heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 18, 244–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A., and Benmamoun, E.. 2015. Factors affecting the retention of sentential negation in heritage Egyptian Arabic. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8, 470–89.Google Scholar
Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Chakrani, B.. 2013. Gender and number agreement in the oral production of Arabic heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Saadah, E.. 2011. Grammatical features of Egyptian and Palestinian heritage speakers’ oral production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 273303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldridge, E. 2004. Ergativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Algeo, J., and Butcher, C.. 2013. The Origins and Development of the English Language. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Allen, S. 2007. The future of Inuktitut in the face of majority languages: bilingualism or language shift? Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 515–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S. 2013. The acquisition of ergativity in Inuktitut. In Bavin, E. and Stoll, S. (eds.), The Acquisition of Ergativity, 71106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, S., Genesee, F., Fish, S., and Crago, M.. 2002. Patterns of code mixing in English–Inuktitut spontaneous speech data. In Du Bois, J. W., Kumpf, L. E., and Ashby, W. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 2, 171–88. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Allen, S., Crago, M., and Pesco, D.. 2006. The effect of majority language exposure on minority language skills: the case of Inuktitut. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9, 578–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., and Rowland, C.. 2013. Experimental methods in studying child language acquisition. WIREs Cognitive Science 4, 149–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ammerlaan, T. 1996. You Get It a Bit Wobbly … Exploring Bilingual Lexical Retrieval in the Context of First Language Attrition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
Anagnostopoulou, E. 2006. Clitic doubling. In Everaert, M. and Riemsdijk, H. van (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Ch. 14. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Annear, L., and Speth, K.. 2015. Maintaining a multilingual repertoire: lexical change in American Norwegian. In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 201–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Anstatt, T. 2009. Von Fröschen und Jungen: Die Kategorie der Belebtheit bei Russischsprechern in Deutschland. Paper presented at the XXXVth Konstanzer Slavistisches Arbeitstreffen, Salzburg.
Anstatt, T. 2011. Sprachattrition: Abbau der Erstsprache bei russisch–deutschen Jugendlichen. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 67, 731.Google Scholar
Anstatt, T. 2013. Polnisch als Herkunftssprache: Sprachspezifische grammatische Kategorien bei bilingualen Jugendlichen. In Kempgen, S. et al. (eds.), Deutsche Beiträge zum 15. Internationalen Slavistenkongress, Minsk 2013, 1525. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Anstatt, T. 2017. Language attitudes and linguistic skills in young heritage speakers of Russian in Germany. In Isurin, L. and Riehl, C. M. (eds.), Integration, Identity and Language Maintenance in Young Immigrants: Russian Germans or German Russians, 197224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antón-Méndez, I., Nicol, J. L., and Garrett, M. F.. 2002. The relation between gender and number agreement processing. Syntax 5, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, M., Best, C. T., Tyler, M. D., and Kroos, C., C. 2011. Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics 39, 558–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., and Choueiri, L.. 2010. The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aoun, J., and Li, Y.-H. A.. 1989. Constituency and scope. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 141–72.Google Scholar
Aoun, J., and Li, Y.-H. A.. 2003. Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Applebaum, A., and Gordon, M.. 2013. A comparative phonetic study of the Circassian languages. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Languages of the Caucasus, 3–17.
Arregi, K. 2002. Focus on Basque Movements. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Arregi, K., and Nevins, A.. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arslan, S., Bastiaanse, R., and Felser, C.. 2015. Looking at the evidence in visual world: eye-movements reveal how bilingual and monolingual Turkish speakers process grammatical evidentiality. Frontiers in Psychology 6, ScholarPubMed
Asherov, D., Fishman, A., and Cohen, E.-G.. 2016. Vowel reduction in Israeli heritage Russian. Heritage Language Journal 13, 113–33.Google Scholar
Au, T. K.-F., and Oh, J.. 2009. Korean as a heritage language. In Ping, Li (ed.), Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics, Part III: Korean Psycholinguistics, 268–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Au, T. K.-F., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., and Oh, J. S.. 2002. Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science 13, 238–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, T. K.-F., Oh, J. S., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., and Romo, L.. 2008. Salvaging a childhood language. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 9981011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avanesov, R. I. 1977. Dialektologičeskie issledovanija po russkomu jazyku. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Avrutin, S., and Babyonyshev, M.. 1997. Obviation in subjunctive clauses and AGR: evidence from Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15, 229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babaii, E., and Ansary, H.. 2001. The C-test: a valid operationalization of reduced redundancy principle? System 29, 209–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babyonyshev, M., Ganger, J., Pesetsky, D., and Wexler, K.. 2001. The maturation of grammatical principles: evidence from Russian unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, E., Brown, C., and Marslen-Wilson, W.. 1986. Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch: a psycholinguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes 1, 249–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backus, A. 1996. Two in One: Bilingual Speech of Turkish Immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Bae, S.-H. 2015. The Syntax–Phonology Interface in Native and Near-Native Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Bae, S.-H., Plaster, K., and Polinsky, M.. 2012. Heritage Korean. Harvard Dataverse, hdl:1902.1/18833.
Bailyn, J. 2014. Against a VP ellipsis account of Russian verb-stranding construction. In McClure, W. and Vovin, A. (eds.), Studies in Japanese and Korean Historical and Theoretical Linguistics and Beyond: A Festschrift to Honor Prof. John B. Whitman on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, 93109. Leiden: Global Oriental/Brill.Google Scholar
Bak, T. H. 2016a. Cooking pasta in La Paz: bilingualism, bias and the replication crisis. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6, 699717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bak, T. H. 2016b. The impact of bilingualism on cognitive aging and dementia: finding a path through a forest of confounding variables. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6, 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. 2003. Lexical Categories: Nouns, Verbs, and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. C. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W., and Trofimovich, P.. 2005. Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech 48, 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baladzhaeva, L., and Laufer, B.. 2017. Is first language attrition possible without second language knowledge? International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, June;
Barlow, J. 2014. Age of acquisition and allophony in Spanish–English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 5, ScholarPubMed
Barlow, J., Branson, P., and Nip, I.. 2013. Phonetic equivalence in the acquisition of /l/ by Spanish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 6885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. 2009. A Sociolinguistic Study of Sustained Veneto–Spanish Bilingualism in Chipilo, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Barnes, H. 2010a. Social motivations for sustained bilingualism in an Italo–Mexican community. In Borgonovo, C. et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 122–35. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. 2010b. Subject pronoun expression in bilinguals of two null subject languages. In Arregi, K. et al. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2008. Interactions in Romance: Selected Papers from the 38th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Urbana-Champaign, April 2008, 922. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. 2006. Strength and Weakness at the Interface: Positional Neutralization in Phonetics and Phonology. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 2007. Phonetics and phonology in Russian unstressed vowel reduction: A study in hyperarticulation. Manuscript, Boston University.
Barski, E. 2017. Nominal case restructuring: a case study on a Polish heritage speaker. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 38.Google Scholar
Bates, E., and Goodman, J.. 1997. On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 12, 507–84.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Dale, P. S., and Thal, D.. 1995. Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In Fletcher, P. and MacWhinney, B. (eds.), Handbook of Child Language, 96151. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bavin, E. L., and Shopen, T.. 1985. Children’s acquisition of Warlpiri: comprehension of transitive sentences. Journal of Child Language 12, 597610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudrie, S., and Ducar, C.. 2005. Beginning level university heritage language programs: creating a space for all heritage language learners. Heritage Language Journal 3, 126.Google Scholar
Beaudrie, S., Ducar, C., and Potowski, K.. 2014. Heritage Language Teaching: Research and Practice. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Behaghel, O. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25, 110–42.Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., and Albirini, A.. 2018. Is learning a standard variety similar to learning a new language? Evidence from heritage speakers of Arabic. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40, 3161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Albirini, A., Montrul, S., and Saadah, E.. 2014. Arabic plurals and root and pattern morphology in Palestinian and Egyptian heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4, 89123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013a. Heritage languages and their speakers: opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39, 129–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. 2013b. Defining an “ideal” heritage speaker: theoretical and methodological challenges. Reply to peer commentaries. Theoretical Linguistics 39, 259–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benneli, B., Belacchi, C., Gini, G., and Lugangeli, D.. 2006. “To define means to say what you know about things”: the development of definitional skills as metalinguistic acquisition. Journal of Child Language 33, 7197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, M. 1960. American–Russian speech. American Speech 35, 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A. 1988. Word class distinctions in developing grammars. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M., and Braine, M. D. S. (eds.), Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition, 4572. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A., and Olshtain, E.. 1983. Features of first language transfer in second language attrition. Applied Linguistics 4, 222–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A., and Slobin, D. I. (eds.). 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, T., and Ritchie, W. (eds.). 2013. The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bianchi, G. 2013. Gender in Italian–German bilinguals: a comparison with German L2 learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 538–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., and Roberts, I.. 2007. Disharmonic word-order systems and the final-over-final-constraint (FOFC). In Bisetto, A. and Barbieri, F. (eds.), Proceedings of XXXIII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa.
Bickerton, D. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7, 173221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1988. Creole languages and the bioprogram. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 268–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binnick, R. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bittner, M., and Hale, K.. 1996. The structural determination of case and agreement. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 168.Google Scholar
Blackwell, A., and Bates, E.. 1995. Inducing agrammatic profiles in normal: evidence for selective vulnerability of morphology under cognitive resource limitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7, 228–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, R. J. 1980. The Acquisition of Mood Selection among Spanish-Speaking Children: Ages 4 to 12. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
Bleam, T. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.
Bloom, L., Rispoli, M., Gartner, B., and Hafitz, J.. 2009. Acquisition of complementation. Journal of Child Language 16, 101–20.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1927. Literate and illiterate speech. American Speech 2, 432–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: same or different? Journal of Pragmatics 11, 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., and Kasper, G. (eds.). 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. New York, NY: Ablex.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and Olshtain, E.. 1984. Requests and apologies: a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5, 196213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, J. 2003. Floating quantifiers: handle with care. In Cheng, L. L. and Sybesma, R. (eds.), The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book: The Latest in Linguistics, 107–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J., and Branigan, P.. 2006. Eccentric agreement and multiple case-checking. In Johns, A., Massam, D., and Ndayiragije, J. (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging Issues, 4777.  Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., and Miller, C. A.. 1991. Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 2, 4593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., Meyer, A., and Schriefers, H.. 2001. Some attractions of verb agreement. Cognitive Psychology 43, 83128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boeckx, C. 2003. Islands and Chains: Resumption as Derivational Residue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., and Nunes, J.. 2008. Copy-reflexive and copy-control constructions: a movement analysis. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8, 61100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, C., Hornstein, N., and Nunes, J.. 2010. Control as Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, T. M., Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Mendez-Perez, A., and Gillam, R. B.. 2010. What you hear and what you say: language performance in Spanish–English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 13, 325–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Böhmer, J. 2015. Biliteralität: Eine Studie zu literaten Strukturen in Sprachproben von Jugendlichen im Deutschen und im Russischen. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, J. 2009. Temporal anaphora in a tenseless language. In Klein, W. and Li, P. (eds.), The Expression of Time in Language, 83128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bolonyai, A. 2002. Case systems in contact: syntactic and lexical case in bilingual child language. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 21(2), 135.Google Scholar
Bolonyai, A. 2007. (In)vulnerable agreement in incomplete bilingual L1 learners. International Journal of Bilingualism 11, 321.Google Scholar
Boon, E. 2014. Heritage Welsh: A Study of Heritage Language As the Outcome of Minority Language Acquisition and Bilingualism. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. 1989. Anaphoric AGR. In Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. J. (eds.), The Null Subject Parameter, 69109, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, G. 1985. Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in der neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bossong, G. 1991. Differential object marking in Romance and beyond. In Wanner, D. and Kibbee, D. (eds.), New Analyses in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the XVIII Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 1988, 143–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Boumans, L. 2006. The attributive possessive in Moroccan Arabic spoken by young bilinguals in the Netherlands and their peers in Morocco. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9, 213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourque, F., Van der Ven, E., and Malla, A.. 2011. A meta-analysis of the risk for psychotic disorders among first- and second-generation immigrants. Psychological Medicine 41, 897910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowern, C. 2008. Linguistic Fieldwork: A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, M. 2011. Exploring the role of modality: second language–heritage learner interactions in the Spanish language classroom. Heritage Language Journal 8, 3065.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. 1987. What is learned in acquiring word classes: a step toward an acquisition theory. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, 6587. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. 1988. Modeling the acquisition of linguistic structure. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M., and Braine, M. D. S. (eds.), Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition, 217–60. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Braun, B., and Tagliapietra, L.. 2010. The role of contrastive intonation contours in the retrieval of contextual alternatives. Language and Cognitive Processes 25, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehmer, B. 2007. Sprechen Sie Qwelja? Formen und Folgen russisch–deutscher Zweisprachigkeit in Deutschland. In Anstatt, T. (ed.), Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen: Erwerb, Formen, Förderung, 163–87. Tübingen: Germany Attempto.Google Scholar
Brehmer, B., and Czachór, A.. 2012. The formation and distribution of the analytic future tense in Polish–German bilinguals. In Braunmüller, K. and Gabriel, C. (eds.), Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies, 297314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehmer, B., and Rothweiler, M.. 2012. The acquisition of gender agreement marking in Polish: a study of bilingual Polish–German-speaking children. In Braunmüller, K. and Gabriel, C. (eds.), Multilingual Individuals and Multilingual Societies, 81100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehmer, B., and Usanova, I.. 2015. Let’s fix it? Cross-linguistic influence in word order patterns of Russian heritage speakers in Germany. In Peukert, H. (ed.), Transfer Effects in Multilingual Language Development, 161–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brinton, D. M., Kagan, O., and Bauckus, S. (eds.). 2008. Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brody, M. 1990. Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 201–25.Google Scholar
Broschart, J. 1997. Why Tongan does it differently: categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology 1, 123–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N. 1996. Russian Learners’ Dictionary: 10,000 Russian Words in Frequency Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, P., and Levinson, S.. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., and Gilman, A.. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in Language, 253–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruck, M., and Genesse, F.. 1995. Phonological awareness in young second language learners. Journal of Child Language 22, 307–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruening, B. 2013. By-phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax 16, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J. 2002. Verb raising in Spanish: a comparison of early and late bilinguals. In Skarabela, B., Fish, S., and Do, A. H.-J. (eds.), BUCLD 26: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 8494. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, B., and Gerfen, C.. 2004. Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7, 95104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, D. M., and Shafto, M. A.. 2004. Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13, 2124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, M., and Kiparsky, C.. 1972. The Gooficon: A Repair Manual for English. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E. 2009. Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning 59, 687715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, D. 1992. Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database. JASA 92, 593–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cain, K., Towse, A. S., and Knight, R. S.. 2008. The development of idiom comprehension: an investigation of semantic and contextual processing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 102, 280–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Cairns, H. S., McDaniel, D., Ryan Hsu, J., and Rapp, M.. 1994. A longitudinal study of principles of control and pronominal reference in child English. Language 70, 260–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82, 3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candea, M., Vasilescu, I., and Adda-Decker, M.. 2005. Inter- and intra-language acoustic analysis of autonomous fillers. Paper presented at DISS 05, Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop, September 2005, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Cantone, K. F. 1999. Das Genus im Italienischen und Deutschen: Empirische Untersuchung zum bilingualen Erstspracherwerb. M.A. thesis, Hamburg University.
Carminati, M. N. 2002. The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Carminati, M. N. 2005. Processing reflexes of the feature hierarchy (person > number > gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua 115, 259–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreira, M., and Beeman, T.. 2014. Voces: Latino Students on Life in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A., Orozco, R., and Shin, N. (eds.). 2015. Subject Pronoun Expression in Spanish: A Cross-Dialectal Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Casasanto, L. S., Hofmeister, P., and Sag, I. A.. 2010. Understanding acceptability judgments: additivity and working memory effects. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Li, C. N. (ed.), Subject and Topic, 27–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (ed.). 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B. 2016. Bilingual perceptual benefits of experience with a heritage language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19, 791809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B., and Yao, Y.. 2016. Toward an understanding of heritage prosody: acoustic and perceptual properties of tone produced by heritage, native, and second language speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal 13, 134–60.Google Scholar
Chang, C. B., Yao, YHaynes, E. F, and Rhodes, R.. 2011. Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 3964–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Li, Wei, et al. 2004. Phonological awareness of bilingual and monolingual Chinese children. Journal of Educational Psychology 96, 142–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Xu, Y., and Guion-Anderson, S.. 2014. Prosodic realization of focus in bilingual production of Southern Min and Mandarin. Phonetica 71, 249–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, L. L.-S. 1997. On the Typology of Wh-Questions. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Cho, S. W. 1989. Parameter, subset principle, and the acquisition of the Korean reflexive pronoun. In Proceedings for the Cognitive Science Conference, Seoul, Korea, 1989, 296301. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.Google Scholar
Cho, S. W. 1992. The syntax and acquisition of “kyay” (“s/he”) and “caki” (“self”). Studies in Generative Grammar 4, 361–92.Google Scholar
Choi, H.-W. 1999. Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Choi, H.-W. 2003. Paradigm leveling in American Korean. Language Research 39, 183204.Google Scholar
Choi, K.-I., and Kim, Y.-J.. 2007. Caykwitaymyengsa-uy tauyseng hayso-kwaceng: Ankwu-wuntong pwunsek [Ambiguity resolution processes of reflexives: eye-tracking data]. Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology 19, 263–77.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184221. Boston, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Martin, R. et al. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, 89155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., and Marinis, T.. 2011. Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H., and Fox Tree, J. E.. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84, 73111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleary, C. 1988. The C-test in English: left-hand deletions. Regional English Language Centre Journal 19(2), 2638.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. 2003. Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cojtí Cuxil, D. 2012. El desarrollo socioeconómico contra el desarrollo de los idiomas indígenas. In STILLA-2011 Proceedings, 183205. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., Cuza, A., and Mazzaro, N.. 2016. Task related effects in the prosody of Spanish heritage speakers and long-term immigrants. In Armstrong, M. E., Henriksen, N., and del Mar Vanrell, M. (eds.), Intonational Grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across Linguistic Subfields, 124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cole, P., Hermon, G., and Huang, C.-T. J.. 2001. Introduction: Long-distance reflexives: the state of the art. In Cole, P., Hermon, G., and Huang, C.-T. J. (eds.), Long-Distance Reflexives (Syntax and Semantics 33), xxiiixlvii. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collentine, J. G. 2003. Development of subjunctive and complex-syntactic abilities among foreign language learners of Spanish. In Lafford, B. and Salaberry, R. (eds.), Studies in Spanish Second Language Acquisition: The State of the Science, 7497. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B., and Kuteva, T.. 2013. Relativization on subjects. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology; available online at (accessed August 23, 2017).Google Scholar
Contreras, H. 1987. Small clauses in Spanish and English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 225–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. 1991. The poverty of the stimulus argument and multicompetence. Second Language Research 7, 103–17.Google Scholar
Cook, V. 1992. Evidence for multicompetence. Language Learning 42, 557–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. 1997. Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 34, 3550.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (ed.). 2003. Effects of the Second Language on the First. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coon, J. 2016. Mayan morphosyntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 10, 515–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. 1979. Variable binding and relative clauses. In Guenthner, F. and Schmidt, S. J. (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, 131–69. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. 1982. Gender in Russian: an account of gender specification and its relationship to declension. Russian Linguistics 6, 197232.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corder, P. 1967. The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowart, W. 1997. Experimental Syntax. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cozens, S. 2003. Heritage learners in the Polish language classroom. Australian Slavonic and East European Studies 17, 2745.Google Scholar
Craig, C. 1979. The antipassive and Jacaltec. In Martin, L. (ed.), Papers in Mayan Linguistics, 139–65. Colombia, MO: Lucas Bros. Publishers.Google Scholar
Crain, S. 2013. What’s parsing got to do with it? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3, 301–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S., and Thornton, R.. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Research on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., et al. 1996. Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition 5, 83153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Csernicskó, I. 2005. Hungarian in Ukraine. In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 89132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. 1978. Bilingualism and the development of metalinguistic awareness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 9, 131–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. 1991. Introduction. The Canadian Modern Language Review 47, 601–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuza, A. 2012. Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax proper: interrogative subject–verb inversion in heritage Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 17, 7196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuza, A., and Frank, J.. 2011. Transfer effects at the syntax–semantics interface: the case of double que questions in heritage Spanish. Heritage Language Journal 8, 6689.Google Scholar
Cuza, A., and Frank, J.. 2015. On the role of experience and age-related effects: evidence from the Spanish CP. Second Language Research 31, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuza, A., Pérez-Leroux, A. T., and Sánchez, L.. 2013. The role of semantic transfer in clitic drop among simultaneous and sequential Chinese–Spanish bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, 93125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuza, A., and Pérez-Tattam, R.. 2012. Grammatical gender selection and phrasal word order in the grammar of Spanish/English bilingual children. Paper presented at Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL42), Southern Utah University.
Dąbrowska, E. 1997. The LAD goes to school: a cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics 35, 735–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. 2012. Different speakers, different grammars: individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2, 219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagut, M., and Laufer, B.. 1985. Avoidance of phrasal verbs: a case for contrastive analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 7379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Pozzo, L. 2015. New Information Subjects in L2 Acquisition: Evidence from Italian and Finnish. Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
Daller, M., Yildiz, C., De Jong, N., Kan, S., and Basbagi, R.. 2011. Language dominance in Turkish German bilinguals: methodological aspects of measurements in structurally different languages. International Journal of Bilingualism 15, 215–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. E., and Lekic, M.. 2013. The heritage and non-heritage learner in the overseas immersion context: comparing learning outcomes and target-language utilization in the Russian flagship. Heritage Language Journal 10(2), 88114.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. 2011. Characteristics of stop releases in American English spontaneous speech. Speech Communication 53, 1042–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, H., and Huijsmans, M.. 2017. Changes in the alignment of arguments in transitive clauses in ʔayʔaǰuθəm (Comox-Sliammon). In Anghelescu, A., Fry, M., Huijsmans, M., and Reisinger, D. (eds.), Papers for the International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages 52 (University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics 45), 1346. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Dawsey, C. B., and Dawsey, J. M. (eds.). 1995. The Confederados: Old South Immigrants in Brazil. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
de Bot, K. 1990. Language attrition, competence loss or performance loss. In Spillner, B. (ed.), Sprache und Politik: Kongreßbeiträge zur 19. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Angewandte Linguistik, 6365. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Déchaine, R.-M. 1993. Predicates Across Categories: Towards a Category-Neutral Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.
Déchaine, R.-M., and Wiltschko, M.. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 409–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, C. 2005. The grammars of Hungarian outside Hungary from a linguistic-typological perspective. In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 351–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
de Houwer, A. 1990. The Acquisition of Two Languages from Birth: A Case Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Houwer, A. 2011. Language input environments and language development in bilingual acquisition. Applied Linguistics Review 2, 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Houwer, A. 2014. The absolute frequency of maternal input to bilingual and monolingual children: a first comparison. In Grüter, T. and Paradis, J. (eds.), Input and Experience in Bilingual Development, 3758. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
De Jong, N., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., and Hulstijn, J.. 2013. Linguistic skills and speaking fluency in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 34, 893916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. 2015. Skill acquisition theory. In Williams, J. and VanPatten, B. (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, 94112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. 2017. Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M. (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 1532. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
DeLancey, S. 1997. Mirativity: the grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1, 3352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, S. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denisova-Schmidt, E. 2014. Heritage Russian: Germany. Harvard Dataverse,
de Prada Pérez, A. 2009. Subject Expression in Minorcan Spanish: Consequences of Contact with Catalan. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
de Prada Pérez, A., and Pascual y Cabo, D.. 2011. Invariable gusta in the Spanish of heritage speakers in the US. In Herschensohn, J. and Tanner, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2011), 110–20. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
de Prada Pérez, A., and Pascual y Cabo, D.. 2012. Interface heritage speech across proficiencies: unaccusativity, focus, and subject position in Spanish. In Geeslin, K. and Díaz-Campos, M. (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 308–18. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Dieser, E. 2007. Osvojenije kategorii roda v ramkax detskogo dvu-/trexjazyčija. In Ceytlin, S. N. (ed.), Semantičeskije kategorii v detskoj reči, 244–63. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija.Google Scholar
Dieser, E. 2009. Genuserwerb im Russischen und Deutschen. Korpusgestützte Studie zu ein- und zweisprachigen Kindern und Erwachsenen. München: Kubon & Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, L. Q., Zhao, J., Quiroz, B. G., and Shin, J.. 2012. Home and community factors influencing bilingual children’s ethnic language vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism 16, 541–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. 1994. The Syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, J. S. 1992. Rightward floating quantifiers float to the left. Linguistic Review 9, 313–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, J. S. 1995. Quantification at a distance and iteration. In Beckman, J. (ed.), The Proceedings of NELS 25, 111–26. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dogruöz, S., and Backus, A.. 2009. Innovative constructions in Dutch Turkish: an assessment of on-going contact-induces change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 4164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döpke, S. 1998. Competing language structures: the acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Journal of Child Language 25, 555–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorian, N. 1981. Language Death: The Life Cycle of a Scottish Gaelic Dialect. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., and Katona, L.. 1992. Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners. Language Testing 9, 187206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druks, J. 2002. Verbs and nouns: a review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics 15, 289315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubinina, I. 2010. How to ask for a favor: a pilot study in heritage Russian pragmatics. In Mustajoki, A., Protassova, E., and Vakhtin, N. (eds.), Instrumentarium of Linguistics: Sociolinguistic Approaches to Non-Standard Russian (Slavica Helsingiensia 40), 418–30. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press.Google Scholar
Dubinina, I., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Russian in the USA. In Moser, M. and Polinsky, M. (eds.), Slavic Languages in Migration, 131–60. Wien: University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Duchin, S. W., and Mysak, E. D.. 1987. Disfluency and rate characteristics of young adult, middle-aged, and older males. Journal of Communicative Disorders 20, 245–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffield, N. 2018. Reflections on Psycholinguistic Theories: Raiding the Inarticulate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, A., and Fox Tree, J. E.. 2009. A quick, gradient bilingual dominance scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., and Dunn, D. M.. 1997. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 3rd edn. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
Dunn, M. J. 1999. A Grammar of Chukchi. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University.
Duursma, E., Romero-Contreras, S., Szuber, A., et al. 2007. The role of home literacy and language environment on bilinguals’ English and Spanish vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 171–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12, 453–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckes, E., and Grotjahn, R.. 2006. A closer look at the construct validity of C-tests. Language Testing 23, 290325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehresmann, T., and Bousquette, J.. 2015. Phonological non-integration of lexical borrowings in Wisconsin West Frisian. In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 234–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Eide, K. M., and Hjelde, A.. 2015. Borrowing modal elements into American Norwegian: the case of suppose(d). In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 256–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
El Aissati, A., and Schaufeli, A.. 1999. Language maintenance and loss: evidence from language perception and production. In Extra, G. and Verhoeven, L. (eds.), Bilingualism and Migration, 363–78. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1991. Grammaticality judgments and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, 161–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, N. C. 2003. Mayan language revival and revitalization politics: linguists and linguistic ideologies. American Anthropologist 105, 733–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L., Bischof, J., Huffstutler, A., Leek, P., and West, C.. 1997. “Tom eats slowly cooked eggs”: thematic-verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition 6, 171–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. 1995. A Grammar of Kayardild: With Historical-Comparative Notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewen, C., and van der Hulst, H.. 2001. The Phonological Structure of Words: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, M. 2006. Language placement exams for heritage speakers of Spanish: learning from students’ mistakes. Foreign Language Annals 39, 595604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, M. 2011. Testing the lexical recognition task with Spanish/English bilinguals in the United States. Language Testing 28, 273–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, M. 2012. A working model for assessing Spanish heritage language learners’ language proficiency through a placement exam. Heritage Language Journal 9(1), 121–38.Google Scholar
Fairclough, M., and Beaudrie, S. (eds.). 2016. Innovative Strategies for Heritage Language Teaching: A Practical Guide for the Classroom. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fallon, P. D. 2002. Phonology of Ejectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Farkas, D. 1978. Direct and indirect object reduplication in Rumanian. In Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS 14), 8897. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farkas, D. 2002. Specificity distinction. Journal of Semantics 19, 213–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenyvesi, A. 1996. The case of American Hungarian case: morphological change in McKeesport, PA. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 43, 381404.Google Scholar
Fenyvesi, A. 2000. The affectedness of the verbal complex in American Hungarian. In Fenyvesi, A. and Sándor, K. (eds.), Language Contact and the Verbal Complex of Dutch and Hungarian: Working Papers from the 1st Bilingual Language Use Theme Meeting of the Study Centre on Language Contact, November 11–13, 1999, Szeged, Hungary, 94107. Szeged: Teacher Training College.Google Scholar
Fenyvesi, A. 2005a. Hungarian in the United States. In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 265318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenyvesi, A. (ed.). 2005b. Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., and Marchman, V.. 2012. Individual differences in lexical processing at 18 months predict vocabulary growth in typically-developing and late-talking toddlers. Child Development 83, 203–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernández Soriano, O. 1989. Strong pronouns in null subject languages and the Avoid Pronoun Principle. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 228–39.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. 2003. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47, 164203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, F., and Swets, B. 2005. The production and comprehension of resumptive pronouns in relative clause “island” contexts. In Cutler, A. (ed.), Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones, 263–78. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Féry, C. 2007. The prosody of topicalization. In Schwabe, K. and Winkler, S. (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form: Generalizations across Languages, 6986. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féry, C. 2011. German sentence accents and embedded prosodic phrases. Lingua 121, 1906–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filip, H. 1999. Aspect, Eventuality Types and Noun Phrase Semantics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Filip, H. 2004. Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 12, 55101.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. 2001. 300-plus years of heritage language education in the United States. In Peyton, J. K. et al. (eds.), Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource, 8198. Washington, DC: Delta Systems and Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Flege, J. 1987. The instrumental study of L2 speech production: some methodological considerations. Language Learning 37, 285–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. 2007. Language contact in bilingualism: phonetic system interactions. Laboratory Phonology 9, 354–81.Google Scholar
Flege, J., and Eefting, W.. 1986. Linguistic and developmental effects on the production and perception of stop consonants. Phonetica 43, 155–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J., and Eefting, W.. 1987. Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics 15, 6783.Google Scholar
Flege, J., and Eefting, W.. 1988. Imitation of a VOT continuum by native speakers of English and Spanish: evidence for phonetic category formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83, 729–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J., Frieda, E., and Nozawa, T.. 1997. Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics 25, 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Yeni-Komshian, G., and Liu, S. H.. 1999. Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 78104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, J., Rieken, E., and Widmer, P. (eds.). 2015. Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C. M. M. 2010. The effect of age on language attrition: evidence from bilingual returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13, 533–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C. M. M. 2012. Differential effects of language attrition in the domains of verb placement and object expression. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 550–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C. M. M. 2015a. Losing a language in childhood: a longitudinal case study on language attrition. Journal of Child Language 42, 562–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C. M. M. 2015b. Understanding heritage language acquisition: some contributions from the research on heritage speakers of European Portuguese. Lingua 164, 251–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, C. M. M. 2016. Portugiesisch als Herkunftssprache. Deutsch als Umgebungssprache. Anmerkungen zum Erwerb der Familiensprache in einem Migrationskontext. In Born, J. and Ladoliva, A. (eds.), Sprachkontakte des Portugiesischen, 4565. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Flores, C. M. M., and Barbosa, P.. 2014. When reduced input leads to delayed acquisition: a study on the acquisition of clitic placement by Portuguese heritage speaker. International Journal of Bilingualism 8, 304–25.Google Scholar
Flores, C. M. M., Kupisch, T., and Rinke, E.. 2016. Linguistic foundations of heritage language development from the perspective of Romance languages in Germany. In Trifonas, P. P. and Aravossitas, T. (eds.), Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education, 118. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Floyd, M. B. 1990. Development of subjunctive mood in children’s Spanish: a review. Confluencia 5, 93104.Google Scholar
Forsyth, J. 1970. A Grammar of Aspect: Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fotopoulou, G. 2004. Code-Switching In the Case of 2nd Generation Greek-German Bilinguals in Germany: An Empirical Study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
Fowler, C., Sramko, V., Ostry, D., Rowland, S., and Hallé, P.. 2008. Cross-language phonetic influences on the speech of French–English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 36, 649–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., and Rizzi, L.. 2006. Agreement and movement: a syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition 101, 173216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, J. 2013. Derivational complexity effects in bilingual adults: instances of interrogative inversion in Spanish. In Aaron, J., Cabrelli Amaro, J., Lord, G., and de Prada Pérez, A. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 143–55. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Franks, S. 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fraundorf, S. H., Watson, D. G., and Benjamin, A. S.. 2010. Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is. Journal of Memory and Language 63, 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, B. 2010. Maya Ethnolinguistic Identity: Violence, Cultural Rights, and Modernity in Highland Guatemala. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Freywald, U., Mayr, K., Özçelik, T., and Wiese, H.. 2011. Kiezdeutsch as a multiethnolect. In Kern, F. and Selting, M. (eds.), Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas, 4573. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frommer, J. G., and Ishikawa, W.. 1980. Alors … euh … on parle français. French Review 53, 501–6.Google Scholar
Fruehwald, J. 2016. Filled pause choice as a sociolinguistic variable. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 2(6), 4049.Google Scholar
Fry, J. 2003. Ellipsis and Wa-Marking in Japanese Conversation. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, M., and Scontras, G.. 2015. The differential representation of number and gender in Spanish. Linguistic Review 32, 703–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, S. 2008. Backward control. Language and Linguistics Compass 2, 168–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuda, S. 2017. Floating numeral quantifiers as an unaccusative diagnostic in native, heritage and L2 Japanese speakers. Language Acquisition 24, 169208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, R. S.-Y. 2000. Final Particles in Standard Cantonese: Semantic Extension and Pragmatic Inference. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Gagarina, N., and Voeikova, M.. 2009. The acquisition of case and number in Russian. In Stephany, U. and Voeikova, M. (eds.), Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 179216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliardi, A. 2012. Input and Intake in Language Acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.
Galambos, S. J., and Goldin-Meadow, S.. 1990. The effects of learning two languages on levels of metalinguistic awareness. Cognition 34, 156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García-Mayo, M., and Hawkins, R.. 2009. Second Language Acquisition of Articles: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garzon, S. S., McKenna Brown, R., Becker Richards, J., and Ajpub’, Wuqu’. 1998. The Life of Our Language: Kaqchikel Maya Maintenance, Shift, and Revitalization. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gass, S. 1983. The development of L2 intuitions. Tesol Quarterly 17, 273–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., and Selinker, L.. 1992. Language Transfer in Language Learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E.Frankish, C. R., Pickering, S. J., and Peaker, S.. 1999. Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25, 8495.Google ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, V. C. M., and Thomas, E. M.. 2007. Factors contributing to language transmission in bilingual families: The core study—adult interviews. In Gathercole, V. C. M. (ed.), Language Transmission in Bilingual Families in Wales, 59181. Cardiff: Welsh Language Board.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., and Thomas, E. M.. 2009. Bilingual first-language development: dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 213–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I. 2000. “I want a chimney builden”: the acquisition of infinitival constructions in bilingual children. In Döpke, S. (ed.), Cross-linguistic Structures in Simultaneous Bilingualism, 123–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., and Nicoladis, E. 2006. Bilingual acquisition: bilingual first language acquisition. In Hoff, E. and Shatz, M. (eds.), Handbook of Language Development, 324–42. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. 1981. Some interesting differences between nouns and verbs. Cognition and Brain Theory 4, 161–78.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. 2001. Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol 16, 317–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. 2002. A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34, 457–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, E. 1998. Syntactic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, G. 1972. Linguistic Atlas of Texas German. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gilkerson, J. S. 2006. Acquiring English Particle Verbs: Age and Transfer Effects in Second Language Acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Gittelson, B., and Polinsky, M.. 2012. Heritage English: France. Harvard Dataverse, hdl:1902.1/18537.
Godson, L. 2003. Phonetics of Language Attrition: Vowel Production and Articulatory Setting in the Speech of Western Armenian Heritage Speakers. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California San Diego.
Godson, L. 2004. Vowel production in the speech of Western Armenian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal 2, 122.Google Scholar
Goodall, G. 1993. On сase and the passive morpheme. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, G. 1999. Passives and arbitrary plural subjects in Spanish. In Authier, J.-M., Bullock, B., and Reed, L. (eds.), Formal Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Papers from the 28th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 135–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Golla, V. 2007. North America. In Moseley, C. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the World’s Endangered Languages, 196. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Göncz, L., and Vörös, O.. 2005. Hungarian in the former Yugoslavia (Vojvodina and Prekmurje). In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 187240. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Vilbazo, K., Bartlett, L., Downey, S., et al. 2015. Methodological considerations in code-switching research. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 6, 119–38.Google Scholar
Gor, K. 2014. Raspberry, not a car: context predictability and a phonological advantage in early and late learners’ processing speech in noise. Frontiers in Psychology 5,
Gribanova, V. 2013. A new argument for verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44, 145–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodner, D., and Gibson, E.. 2005. Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity. Cognitive Science 29, 261–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. 2010. Bilingual: Life and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotjahn, R. 1987. How to construct and evaluate a C-test: a discussion of some problems and some statistical analyses. In Grotjahn, R., Klein-Braley, C., and Stevenson, D. K. (eds.), Taking Their Measure: The Validity and Validation of Language Tests, 219–53. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Grotjahn, R., Klein-Braley, C., and Raatz, U.. 2002. C-tests: an overview. In Coleman, J., Grotjahn, R., and Raatz, U. (eds.), University Language Testing and the C-Test, 93114. Bochum: AKS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Guasti, M.-T. 2017. Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua–Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica 60, 98128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gundel, J. K. 1988. Universals of topic-comment structure. In Hammond, M., Moravcsik, E., and Wirth, J. (eds.), Studies in Syntactic Typology, 209–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gupol, O. 2009. The Acquisition of Russian Verbal Morphosyntax in Russian–Hebrew Bilingual Children. Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.
Gupol, O., Rothstein, S., and Armon-Lotem, S.. 2012. The development of L1 Russian tense-aspect morphology in Russian–Hebrew sequential bilinguals. In Labeau, E. and Saddour, I. (eds.), Tense, Aspect and Mood in First and Second Language Acquisition, 73106. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Gussmann, E. 2007. The Phonology of Polish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gut, U. 2000. Cross-linguistic structures in the acquisition of intonational phonology by German–English bilingual children. In Döpke, S. (ed.), Cross-Linguistic Structures in Simultaneous Bilingualism, 201–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gutièrrez-Bravo, R. 2005. Subject inversion in Spanish relative clauses a case of prosody-induced word order variation without narrow focus. In Geerts, T., van Ginneken, I., and Jacobs, H. (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” 2003, Nijmegen, 20–22 November, 115–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gvozdev, A. N. 1961. Voprosy izučenija detskoj reči. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii pedagogičeskix nauk RSFSR.Google Scholar
Haddad, Y. 2009. Copy control in Telugu. Journal of Linguistics 45, 69109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59, 781819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G. 1995. Syntax and morphology in language attrition: a study of five bilingual expatriate Swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5, 153–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmari, H. 1997. Government and Codeswitching: Explaining American Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmari, H. 2005. “I’m forgetting both”: L1 maintenance and codeswitching in Finnish–English language contact. International Journal of Bilingualism 9, 397433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harves, S. 2013. The genitive of negation in Russian. Language and Linguistics Compass 7, 647–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, H., and Ritter, E.. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78, 482526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, C.-H., and Lee, C.. 2007. On negative imperatives in Korean. Linguistic Inquiry 38, 373–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasselmo, N. 1961. American Swedish: A Study in Bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hasselmo, N. 1974. Amerikasvenska: En bok om språkutvecklingen i Svensk-Amerika. Stockholm: Esselte Stadium.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1953. The Norwegian Language in America, vol. 1: The Bilingual Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. 1987. Blessings of Babel: Bilingualism and Language Planning, Problems and Pleasures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, A. W. 2011. Heritage language socialization. In Duranti, A., Ochs, E., and Schieffelin, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Socialization, 587609. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, A. W. 2012. “Do I really have to?”: The give-and-take of deontic meaning in Chinese. In Kádár, D. and Pan, Yuling (eds.), Chinese Discourse and Interaction, 6887. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2014. Identity construction throughout the life cycle. In Wiley, T., Peyton, J. K., Christian, D., Moore, S., and Liu, N. (eds.), Handbook of Heritage and Community Languages in the United States: Research, Educational Practice, and Policy, 324–32. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2015. Literacy, creativity, and continuity: a language socialization perspective on heritage language classroom interaction. In Markee, N. (ed.), Handbook of Classroom Interaction, 304–18. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
He, A. W. 2016. Across generations and geographies: communication in Chinese heritage language speaking households. In Wei, Li (ed.), Multilingualism in the Chinese Diaspora Worldwide, 293311. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hendery, R. 2012. Relative Clauses in Time and Space: A Case Study in the Methods of Diachronic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., and Norenzayan, A.. 2010. The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 61135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, C. 2008. Japanese -wa, -ga, and information structure. In Miyagawa, S. and Saito, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Japanese linguistics, 5483. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C. 2011. The Acquisition of Raising. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Hirsch, C., and Wexler, K.. 2006. Children’s passives and their resulting interpretation. In Ud Deen, K. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), 125–36. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., et al. 2012. Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language 39, 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoji, H. 1985. Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structure in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
Hoot, B. 2012. Presentational Focus in Heritage and Monolingual Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Hoji, H. 2017. Narrow presentational focus in heritage Spanish and the syntax–discourse interface. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7, 6395.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 6996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, J. 1986. FOCUS in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Horvath, J. 2005. Is “focus movement” driven by stress? In Piñon, C. and Siptár, P. (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian, vol. 9, 131–58. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadό.Google Scholar
Horvath, J. 2010. “Discourse-features,” syntactic displacement and the status of contrast. Lingua 120, 1346–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Z. 2002. Phonological Development in Specific Contexts: Studies of Chinese-Speaking Children. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Z. and Dodd, B.. 2000. The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (modern standard Chinese). Journal of Child Language 27, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Huang, C.-T. J. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–74.Google Scholar
Hudson Kam, C. L. 2015. The impact of conditioning variables on the acquisition of variation in adult and child learners. Language 91, 906–37.Google Scholar
Huffines, M. K. 1987. The dative case in Pennsylvania German: diverging norms in language maintenance and loss. Yearbook of German–American Studies 22, 173.Google Scholar
Hulk, A., and Müller, N.. 2000. Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3, 227–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulsen, M. 2000. Language Loss and Language Processing: Three Generations of Dutch Migrants in New Zealand. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
Iatridou, S. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 231–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., and Wexler, K.. 2004. Article semantics in L2 acquisition: the role of specificity. Language Acquisition 12, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irizarri van Suchtelen, P. 2014. Maintained and acquired heritage Spanish in the Netherlands: the case of dative constructions. Applied Linguistics Review 5, 375400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irrizari van Suchtelen, P. 2016. Spanish as a Heritage Language in the Netherlands: A Cognitive Linguistic Exploration. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Isurin, L., and Ivanova-Sullivan, T.. 2008. Lost in between: the case of Russian heritage speakers. Heritage Language Journal 6, 72103.Google Scholar
Ito, K., and Speer, S. R.. 2008. Anticipatory effects of intonation: eye movements during instructed visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 541–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivanova-Sullivan, T. 2013. Heritage Russian. Harvard Dataverse, hdl:1902.1/19792.
Ivanova-Sullivan, T. 2014. Theoretical and Experimental Aspects of Syntax–Discourse Interface in Heritage Grammars. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 2135.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 2002a. English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. In Dehé, N., Jackendoff, R., McIntyre, A., and Urban, S. (eds.), Verb-particle Explorations, 6794. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 2002b. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafarpur, A. 1995. Is C-testing superior to cloze? Language Testing 12, 194216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1932/1971. Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Selected Writings of Roman Jakobson, vol. 2: Word and Language, 315. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1968. Child Language, Aphasia, and Phonological Universals. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, D. 1982. Past tense and the hypothetical: a cross-linguistic study. Studies in Language 6, 375403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jannedy, S., and Weirich, M.. 2014. Perceptual divergence in an urban setting: category instability of the palatal fricative. Journal of Laboratory Phonology 5, 91122.Google Scholar
Jannedy, S., Weirich, M., and Wagner, L.. 2015. Acoustic analyses of differences in [ç] and [ʃ] productions in Hood German. In XVIII ICPhS, Glasgow. Glasgow: University of Glasgow Press.Google Scholar
Janse, M. 2004. Animacy, definiteness and case in Cappadocian and other Asia Minor Greek dialects. Journal of Greek Linguistics 5, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarayapun, J. 2015. Language Teacher Identity Negotiation: A Case Study of a Heritage Thai Language Class in a Thai Buddhist School in the United States. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
Jarvis, S. 1998. Conceptual Transfer in the Interlingual Lexicon. Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications.Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., and Ponti, E.. 2014. Peer review among students of Spanish as a heritage language: the effectiveness of a metalinguistic literacy task. Linguistics and Education 26, 7082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., and Tomita, Y.. 2007. Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Canadian Modern Language Review/La revue canadienne des langues vivantes 64, 215–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, L., and Bailey, R.. 2008. The (re)acquisition of perfective aspect marking by Chinese heritage language learners. In He, A.W. and Xiao, Yun (eds.), Chinese as a Heritage Language: Fostering Rooted World Citizenry, 205–24. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Á., and Spyropoulos, V.. 2013. Feature inheritance, vP phrases and the information structure of small clauses. Studia Linguistica 67, 185224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. 2015. Attrition in an American Norwegian heritage language speaker. In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 4671. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, J. B., and Laake, S.. 2015. On two myths of the Norwegian language in America: Is it old-fashioned? Is it approaching the written Bokmål standard? In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 299322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, L. 1998. Code copying in Irano-Turkic. Language Sciences 20, 325–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S. 1992. Critical period effects in second language acquisition: the effect of written versus auditory materials on the assessment of grammatical competence. Language Learning 42, 217–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S., Shenkman, K. D., Newport, E. L., and Medin, D. L.. 1996. Indeterminacy in the grammar of adult language learners. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 335–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, A. 1989. Processing Crossed and Nested Dependencies: An Automaton Perspective on the Psycholinguistic Results, University of Pennsylvania Department of Computer and Information Science Technical Report No. MS-CIS-89–58, Philadelphia.
Juffs, A., and Harrington, M.. 1996. Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing. Language Learning 46, 283326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, S.-A. 1996. The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean: Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Structure. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kádár, D., and Haugh, M.. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, O., Carreira, M., and Chik, C. (eds.). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Heritage Language Education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, O., and Friedman, D.. 2003. Using the OPI to place heritage speakers of Russian. Foreign Language Annals 36, 536–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, B.-M. 1998a. Mwunpep-kwa ene sayong: Khophes-ey kipanhan caykwisa “caki,” “casin,” “caki-casin”-uy kinung pwunsek-ul cwungsim-ulo [Grammar and the use of language: Korean reflexives “caki,” “casin,” and “caki-casin”]. Kwuk-e-hak 31, 165204.Google Scholar
Kang, B.-M. 1998b. Three kinds of Korean reflexives: a corpus linguistic investigation on grammar and usage. In Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC12), 1019.
Kang, B.-M. 2002. Categories and meanings of Korean floating quantifiers: with some reference to Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11, 375–98.Google Scholar
Kang, S.-G. 2011. English Attrition in Korean–English Bilingual Children. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Mānoa.
Kang, H.-S., and Kim, I.-S.. 2012. Perceived and actual competence and ethnic identity in heritage language learning: a case of Korean–American college students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15, 279–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, K.-H., and Guion, S.. 2006. Phonological systems in bilinguals: age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean–English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119, 1672–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Y., and Nagy, N.. 2012. VOT merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 115. Toronto: Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Kang, Y., and Nagy, N.. 2016. VOT merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. Language Variation and Change 28, 249–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimi, H., and Ferreira, F.. 2016. Good-enough linguistic representations and online cognitive equilibrium in language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69, 1013–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karimi, S. 2003. Focus movement and uninterpretable features. In Carnie, A., Harley, H., and Willie, M. (eds.), Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar. Festschrift for Eloise Jelinek, 297306. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1981. A Functional Approach to Child Language: A Study of Determiners and Reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D., and Aronoff, M.. 1991. Morphological disintegration and reconstruction in first language attrition. In Seliger, H. W. and Vago, R. M. (eds.), First Language Attrition, 175–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, T. 1990. Algunos rasgos estructurales de los idiomas mayances con referencia especial al K’iche’. In England, N. C. and Elliot, S. R. (eds.), Lecturas sobre la linguïstica maya, 59114. Antigua: CIRMA.Google Scholar
Kayam, O. 2013. Heritage language maintenance among native English speakers living in Israel. Journal of Sociological Research 4(2), 308–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayam, O., and Hirsch, T.. 2013. Israel’s English speaking immigrant parents’ family language policy management: language in the education domain. International Journal of Linguistics 5(1), 320–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax: The transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 647–86.Google Scholar
Keating, G. D., Jegerski, J., and VanPatten, B.. 2016. Online processing of subject pronouns in monolingual and heritage bilingual speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19, 3649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, G. D., VanPatten, B., and Jegerski, J.. 2011. Who was walking on the beach? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 193221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, S. 1983. Yukulta. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, B. J. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, 190301. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L., and Comrie, B.. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 6399.Google Scholar
Keffala, B. 2011. Resumption and gaps in English relative clauses: Relative acceptability creates an illusion of “saving.” In Cathcart, C., Chen, I. H., Finley, G., et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 140–54. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Keijzer, M. 2004. First language attrition: A cross-linguistic investigation of Jakobson’s regression hypothesis. International Journal of Bilingualism 8, 389–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S., Thompson, M., and Marquis, J.. 2001. Longitudinal change in language production: effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content. Psychology and Aging 16, 600–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempler, D., Van Lancker, D., Marchman, V., and Bates, E.. 1999. Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral damage. Developmental Neuropsychology 15, 327–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P. 2002. Koineization and accommodation. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P., and Schilling-Estes, N. (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 669702. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kertesz, A. 1982. Western Aphasia Battery. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Kim, B., and Goodall, G.. 2016. Islands and non-islands in native and heritage Korean. Frontiers in Psychology 7, ScholarPubMed
Kim, E., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2015. The on-line processing of binding principles in second language acquisition: evidence from eye tracking. Applied Psycholinguistics 36, 1317–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.-H. 2007. Binding Interpretations in Adult Bilingualism: A Study of Language Transfer in L2 Learners and Heritage Speakers of Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2006. On the logophoric long-distance binding interpretation of the Korean local anaphor “сaki-casin” by early bilinguals. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 30, 305–15.Google Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2009. Binding interpretations of anaphors by Korean heritage speakers. Language Acquisition 16, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J.-H., Montrul, S., and Yoon, J.. 2010. Dominant language influence in acquisition and attrition of binding: interpretation of the Korean reflexive caki. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13, 7384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K., O’Grady, W., and Ud Deen, K.. 2014. Poor performance on scrambled Korean OSV sentences by Korean heritage children: performance, not competence. In Chu, C.-Y. et al. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA 2012), 5159. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Kim, K., O’Grady, W., and Schwartz, B.. 2018. Case in heritage Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 8, 252–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. 2002. Phonological Features: Privative or Equipollent? B.A. senior thesis, Harvard University.
Kiss, K. É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74, 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein-Braley, C. 1997. C-tests in the context of reduced redundancy testing: an appraisal. Language Testing 14, 4784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein-Braley, C., and Raatz, E.. 1984. A survey on the C-test. Language Testing 1(2), 134–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klockeid, T. 1976. Topics in Lardil Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., Oh, J. S., and Au, T. K.-F.. 2003. Production benefits of childhood overhearing. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 114, 465–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ko, H. 2005. Syntactic Edges and Linearization. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Ko, H., and Oh, E.. 2010. A hybrid approach to floating quantifiers: experimental evidence. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 19, 118.Google Scholar
Ko, H., and Seo, S.. 2012. NP-ellipsis revisited: the role of D feature. Studies in Generative Grammar 22, 677702.Google Scholar
Kong, A. P.-H. 2013. The use of sentence final particles in Cantonese speakers with aphasia. US–China Foreign Languages 11, 659–67.Google Scholar
Koornneef, A., Avrutin, S., Wijnen, F., and Reuland, E.. 2011. Tracking the preference for bound-variable dependencies in ambiguous ellipses and only-structures. In Runner, J. (ed.), Experiments at the Interfaces (Syntax and Semantics 37), 67100. Leiden: Emerald Publishers/Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koornneef, A., and Reuland, E.. 2016. On the shallow processing (dis)advantage: grammar and economy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, ScholarPubMed
Kozinsky, I., Nedjalkov, V., and Polinskaja, M.. 1988. Antipassive in Chukchee. In Shibatani, M. (ed.), Passive and Voice, 651706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozminska, K. 2013. Language contact in the Polish–American community in Chicago. International Journal of Bilingualism 19, 239–58.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. 2015. The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. 1998. Language shyness and heritage language development. In Krashen, S., Tse, L., and McQuillan, J. (eds.), Heritage Language Development, 4149. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Rooryck, J. and Zaring, L. (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 109–37. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 2004. Building resultatives. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Krifka, M. 1990. Four thousand ships passed through the lock: object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 487520.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. 2008. Dominance, mixing, and cross-linguistic influence: on their relation in bilingual development. In Guijarro-Fuentes, P., Larrañaga, P., and Clibbens, J. (eds.), First Language Acquisition of Morphology and Syntax: Perspectives across Languages and Learners, 209–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. 2012. Generic subjects in the Italian of early German–Italian bilinguals and German learners of Italian as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 736–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. 2013. A new term for a better distinction? A view from the higher end of the proficiency scale. Theoretical Linguistics 39, 203–14.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Hailer, K., et al. 2014a. Foreign accent in adult simultaneous bilinguals? Heritage Language Journal 11, 123–50.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Lein, T., Barton, D., et al. 2014b. Acquisition outcomes across domains in adult simultaneous bilinguals with French as weaker and stronger language. French Language Studies 24, 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., Belikova, A., Özçelik, Ö., Stangen, I., and White, L.. 2017. Restrictions on definiteness in the grammars of German–Turkish heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 7, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., and Pierantozzi, C.. 2010. Interpreting definite plural subjects: a comparison of German and Italian monolingual and bilingual children. In Franich, K., Iserman, K. M., and Keil, L. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Boston University Conference of Language Development, 245–54. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., and Rothman, J.. 2016. Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, online June 2016.
Kupisch, T., and van de Weijer, J. 2016. The role of the childhood environment for language dominance: a study of adult simultaneous bilingual speakers of German and French. In Silva-Corvalán, C. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.), Language Dominance in Bilinguals, 174–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 1970. Japanese Syntax and Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. 2005. Focusing on the matter of topic: a study of wa and ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14, 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsov, P. S. 1953. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka. Morfologija. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU.Google Scholar
Kwon, N.-Y., Polinsky, M., and Kluender, R.. 2006. Subject preference in Korean. In Baumer, D., Montero, D., and Scanlon, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kynette, D., and Kemper, S.. 1986. Aging and the loss of grammatical forms: a cross-sectional study of language performance. Language and Communication 6, 6572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Morgia, F. 2011. Bilingual First Language Acquisition: The Nature of the Weak Language and the Role of the Input. Ph.D. dissertation, SALIS, Dublin City University.
Labov, W., Karen, M., and Miller, C.. 1991. Near-mergers and the suspension of phonemic contrast. Language Variation and Change 3, 3374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., Yaeger, M., and Steiner, R.. 1972. A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Philadelphia: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. 2008. Compositional telicity and heritage Russian aspect. In Grosvald, M. and Soares, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL), vol. 19, 150–60. Davis, CA: University of California Davis.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. 2010. The Syntax–Pragmatics Interface in Language Loss: Covert Restructuring of Aspect in Heritage Russian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Laleko, O., and Kawamura, H.. 2011. Grammatical restructuring in intergenerational language shift: a case of heritage Japanese. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Conference of the International Linguistics Association, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, April 15–17.
Laleko, O., and Polinsky, M.. 2013. Marking topic or marking case: a comparative investigation of heritage Japanese and heritage Korean. Heritage Language Journal 10, 4064.Google Scholar
Laleko, O., and Polinsky, M.. 2016. Between syntax and discourse: topic and case marking in heritage speakers and L2 learners of Japanese and Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6, 396439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laleko, O., and Polinsky, M.. 2017. Silence is difficult: on missing elements in bilingual grammars. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 36, 135–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., and Fillenbaum, S.. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60, 4451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, I. 2006. Chain resolution in Hebrew V(P)-fronting. Syntax 9, 3266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, I. 2015. A Two-Tiered Theory of Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lanstyák, I., and Szabómihály, G.. 2005. Hungarian in Slovakia. In Fenyvesi, A. (ed.), Hungarian Language Contact outside Hungary: Studies on Hungarian as a Minority Language, 4788. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanza, E. 1997. Language Mixing in Infant Bilingualism: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lanza, E. 2001. Temporality and language contact in narratives by children bilingual in Norwegian and English. In Verhoeven, L. and Strömqvist, S. (eds.), Narrative Development in a Multilingual Context, 1550. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. 1998. Case and tense in the “fossilized” steady state. Second Language Research 14, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmouth, D. W. 1974. Differential interface in American Finnish cases. Language 50, 356–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, I., Tingsell, S., and Andréasson, M.. 2015. Variation and change in American Swedish. In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 359–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laskowski, R. 1990. The category of case in Polish idiolects of Polish children in Sweden. Wiener Slawistisches Almanach 25–26, 257–74.Google Scholar
Laskowski, R. 1993. The endangered language: the acquisition of the case system by Polish children in Sweden. In Hentschel, G. and Laskowski, R. (eds.), Studies in Polish Morphology and Syntax, 121–62. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Laskowski, R. 2009. Język w zagrożeniu: Przyswajanie języka polskiego w warunkach polsko-szwedzkiego bilingwizmu. Kraków: Universitas Press.Google Scholar
Lass, R. 1987. The Shape of English: Structure and History. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Law, A. 2002. Cantonese sentence-final particles and the CP domain. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 14, 375–98.Google Scholar
Lee, C. 2007. Contrastive (predicate) topic, intonation, and scalar meanings. In Lee, C., Gordon, M., and Büring, D. (eds.), Topic and Focus: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Meaning and Intonation, 151–75. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, F. 2003. Anaphoric R-expressions as bound variables. Syntax 6, 84114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, F. 2006. Remnant Raising and VSO Clausal Architecture: A Case Study of San Lucas Quiavini Zapotec. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Lee, H. 1990. Logical Relations in the Child’s Grammar: Relative Scope, Bound Variables, and Long-Distance Binding in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Irvine.
Lee, H., and Wexler, K.. 1987. The acquisition of reflexives and pronouns in Korean: from a cross-linguistic perspective. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.
Lee, H.-J. 2015. Information structure, topic predictability and gradients in Korean case ellipsis: a probabilistic account. Linguistic Research 32, 749–71.Google Scholar
Lee, H.-T. T. 1986. Studies on Quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Lee, M., Kwak, H.-Y., Lee, S.-Y., and O’Grady, W.. 2011. Processing, pragmatics, and scope in Korean and English. In Sohn, H.-M. et al. (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 19, 297311. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lee, S. 2009. Interpreting Ambiguity in First and Second Language Processing: Universal Quantifiers and Negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii Mānoa.
Lee, T. 2011. Grammatical knowledge of Korean heritage speakers: early vs. late bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee-Ellis, S. 2012. Looking into Bilingualism through the Heritage Speaker’s Mind. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.
Lefebvre, C., and Muysken, P.. 1982. Relative Clauses in Cuzco Quechua: Interactions between Core and Periphery. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lein, T., Kupisch, T., and van de Weijer, J.. 2016. Voice onset time and global foreign accent in German–French simultaneous bilinguals during adulthood. International Journal of Bilingualism 20, 732–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leisiö, L. 2001. Morphosyntactic Convergence and Integration in Finland Russian. Tampere: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
Leisiö, L. 2006. Genitive subjects and objects in the speech of Finland Russians. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14, 289315.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. 2004. Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3, 75114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, S. 2012. The Use of Linguistics to Improve the Teaching of Heritage Language Spanish. B.A. thesis, Harvard University.
Levin, B., and Rapaport Hovav, M.. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax–Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levine, G. 2000. Incomplete L1 Acquisition in the Immigrant Situation: Yiddish in the Unites States. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levorato, M. C., and Cacciari, C.. 1995. The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 60, 261–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levorato, M. C., and Cacciari, C.. 2002. The creation of new figurative expressions: psycholinguistic evidence in Italian children, adolescents and adults. Journal of Child Language 29, 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levorato, M. C., Nesi, B., and Cacciari, C.. 2004. Reading comprehension and understanding idiomatic expressions: a developmental study. Brain and Language 91, 303–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Levy, Y. 1988. The nature of early language: evidence from the development of Hebrew morphology. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M., and Braine, M. D. S. (eds.), Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition, 7398. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., and Fennig, C. D. (eds.). 2016. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 19th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Available online at Scholar
Li, B. 2006. Chinese Sentence Particles and the Syntax of the Periphery. Ph.D. dissertation, Leiden University.
Liao, Y., and Fukuya, Y.. 2002. Avoidance of phrasal verbs: the case of Chinese learners of English. Second Language Studies 20, 71106.Google Scholar
Lidz, J., and Gagliardi, A.. 2015. How nature meets nurture: universal grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of Linguistics 1, 333–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, J., and Musolino, J.. 2002. Children’s command of quantification. Cognition 84, 113–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipski, J. M. 1984. On the weakening of /s/ in Latin American Spanish. Zeitschrift fürDialektologie und Linguistik 51, 3143.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. M. 1985. /s/ in Central American Spanish. Hispania 68, 143–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipski, J. M. 1996. Patterns of pronominal evolution in Cuban–American bilinguals. In Roca, A. and Jensen, J. B. (eds.), Spanish in Contact: Issues in Bilingualism, 159–86. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. 1999. Perceiving final voiceless stops without release: effects of preceding monophthongs versus nonmonophthongs. Phonetica 56, 4455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisker, L., and Abramson, A.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stop: acoustic measurements. Word 20, 384422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, A. 2009. Lessons about respect and affect in a Korean heritage language school. Linguistics and Education 20, 217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, D. N., and Leach, E.. 1975. Children’s acquisition of idioms in the English language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 18, 521–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Lohndal, T., and Westergaard, M.. 2016. Grammatical gender in American Norwegian heritage language: stability or attrition? Frontiers in Psychology 7, ScholarPubMed
López, L. 2012. Indefinite Objects: Scrambling, Choice Functions, and Differential Marking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, M. L., and Page, R.. 2005. Stable bilingualism and phonological (non)convergence in Pennsylvania German. In Cohen, J., McAlister, K. T., Rolstad, K., and MacSwan, J. (eds.), ISB4: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, 1384–92. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lowry, C. 2017. Bilingual in Brooklyn: Georgian as a heritage language in America. Paper presented at the Works-in-Progress Seminar, Tbilisi, June.
Luján, M., and Parodi, C.. 1996. Clitic-doubling and the acquisition of agreement in Spanish. In AuCoin, M. et al. (eds.), Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 32, vol. I: The General Session, 237–50. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Lukyanchenko, A., and Gor, K.. 2011. Perceptual correlates of phonological representations in heritage speakers and L2 learners. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 414–26. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lust, B., Flynn, S., and Foley, C.. 1996. What children know about what they say: elicited imitation as a research method for assessing children’s syntax. In McDaniel, D., McKee, C., and Cairns, H. S. (eds.), Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax, 5576. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. 2008. The linguistic similarities of Spanish heritage and second language learners. Foreign Language Annals 41, 252381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyskawa, P. 2015. Variation in Case Marking in Heritage Polish. M.A. thesis, University of Toronto.
Lyskawa, P., Maddeaux, R., Melara, E, and Nagy, N.. 2016. Heritage speakers follow all the rules: language contact and convergence in Polish devoicing. Heritage Language Journal 13, 219–44.Google Scholar
Madigan, S. 2015. Anaphora and binding. In Brown, L. and Yeon, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Korean Linguistics, 137–54. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Maandi, K. 1989. Estonian immigrants in Sweden. In Dorian, N. (ed.), Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death, 227–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahadeva Sastri, K. 1969. Historical Grammar of Telugu: With Special Reference to Old Telugu, c. 200 B.C.–1000 A.D. Anantapur: Sri Venkateswara University.Google Scholar
Mahajan, G. 2009. Ongoing deficits in heritage Hindi. Paper presented at the Third Annual Heritage Language Institute, Urbana Champaign, IL, June.
Mai, K. 2015. Heritage Speakers on the Edge: Sentence Final Particle Usage among Heritage Cantonese Speakers. B.A. thesis, Harvard University.
Maratsos, M. 1988. The acquisition of formal word classes. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M., and Braine, M. D. S. (eds.), Categories and Processes in Language Acquisition, 3144. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. 1991. How the acquisition of nouns may be different from that of verbs. In Krasnegor, N. A. and Rumbaugh, D. M. (eds.), Biological and Behavioral Determinants of Language Development, 6788. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. 1998. Relations of lexical specificity to general categories. Linguistics 36, 831–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., et al. 1992. Overregularisation in Language Acquisition (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57, 4).PubMed
Mardale, A. 2007. Les prépositions fonctionnelles du roumain: étude comparative. Ph.D. dissertation, University Paris Diderot and University of Bucharest.
Mardale, A. 2010. Éléments d’analyse du marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues romanes. Faits de Langues. Les Cahiers 2, 161–97.Google Scholar
Mardale, A. 2013. Le statut de pe en roumain et de a en espagnol. In Tseng, J. (ed.), Prépositions et postpositions: Approches typologiques et formelles, 207–53. Paris: Hermès-Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Marti, L. 2006. Indirectness and politeness in Turkish–German bilingual and Turkish monolingual requests. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1836–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matasović, R. 2004. Gender in Indo-European. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Matejka, L. 2008. A first approach to grammatical interference in the idiom of Greek Americans. In Lavidas, N., Nouchtouridou, E., and Sionti, M. (eds.), New Perspectives in Greek linguistics, 261–72. London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Matthews, S., and Yip, V.. 2011. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthewson, L. 2006. Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language. Linguistics and Philosophy 29, 273313.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 1998. Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics 36, 281331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R. 1977. The Grammar of Quantification. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
May, R. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. 1969. Frog, Where Are You? New York: Dial Books.Google Scholar
Mayr, R., Morris, J., Mennen, I., and Williams, D.. 2015. Disentangling the effects of long-term language contact and individual bilingualism: the case of monophthongs in Welsh and English. International Journal of Bilingualism 21, 245–67.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L. 2002. A Place to Be Navajo: Rough Rock and the Struggle for Self-Determination in Indigenous Schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. 2000. Grammaticality judgments in a second language: influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics 21, 395423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. 2006. Beyond the critical period: processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language 55, 381401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKee, C., and McDaniel, D.. 2001. Resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. Language Acquisition 9, 113–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, J. H. 2005. Defining Creole. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Medeiros, R. 1982. American Brazilian English. American Speech 57, 150–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehlhorn, G. 2004. The prosodic pattern of contrastive topic in Russian. In Steube, A. (ed.), Information Structure: Theoretical and Empirical Aspects, 241–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 1989. Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In Hyltenstam, K. and Obler, L. K. (eds.), Bilingualism across the Lifespan: Aspects of Acquisition, Maturity and Loss, 1340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (ed.). 1990. Two First Languages: Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Children. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (ed.). 1994. Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2001. The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In Cenoz, J. and Genesee, F. (eds.), Trends in Bilingual Acquisition, 1141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2004. The bilingual child. In Bhatia, T. K. and Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism, 91113. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2009. Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 28, 534.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 2011. First and Second Language Acquisition: Parallels and Differences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, J. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, M. 2017. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 production. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 5068. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mikulski, A. M. 2006. Native Intuitions, Foreign Struggles? Knowledge of the Subjunctive in Volitional Constructions among Heritage and Traditional FL Learners of Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa.
Miller, K., and Schmitt, C.. 2004. Wide-scope indefinites in English child language. In van Kampen, J. and Baaw, S. (eds.), Proceedings of GALA, 317–28. Utrecht: LOT Occasional Series.Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, S. 2009. Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 41, 1047–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ming, T., and Tao, H.. 2008. Developing a Chinese heritage language corpus: issues and a preliminary report. In He, A. W. and Xiao, Yun (eds.), Chinese as a Heritage Language: Fostering Rooted World Citizenry, 167–88. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Mānoa.Google Scholar
Moag, R. 1995. Semi-native speakers: how to hold and mold them. In Gambhir, V. (ed.), The Teaching and Acquisition of South Asian Languages, 168–81. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Modyanova, N. 2006. The genitive of negation construction in Russian–English bilinguals. An online supplement to the Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development, BUCLD.
Momma, S., and Phillips, C.. 2018. The relationship between parsing and generation. Annual Review of Linguistics 4, 233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montalbetti, M. M. 1984. After Binding: On the Interpretation of Pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Montgomery, M. B., and Melo, C. A.. 1990. The phonology of the lost cause: the English of the Confederados in Brazil. English World-Wide 10, 195216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, M. B., and Melo, C. A.. 1995. The language: the preservation of Southern speech among the colonists. In Dawsey, C. B. and Dawsey, J. M. (eds.), The Confederados: Old South Immigrants in Brazil, 176–90. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2002. Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5, 3968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2004. Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: a case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7, 125–42.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. 2005a. On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2 acquisition. Linguistics 43, 1153–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2005b. Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research 21, 199249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2008. Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism: Re-examining the Age Factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2009. Knowledge of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 13, 239–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2011. Morphological errors in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 155–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2016. The Acquisition of Heritage Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., and Bateman, N.. 2017. Differential Object Marking in Romanian as a heritage language in the United States. Poster presented at the Tenth Heritage Language Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, May.
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., and Bhatia, A.. 2012. Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2, 141–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., and Girju, R.. 2015. Differential object marking in Spanish, Hindi and Romanian as heritage languages. Language 91, 564610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., and Bowles, M.. 2009. Back to basics: differential object marking under incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 363–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Davidson, J., de la Fuente, I., and Foote, R.. 2014. Early language experience facilitates the processing of gender agreement in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17, 118–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., and Foote, R. 2014. Age of acquisition interactions in bilingual lexical access: a study of the weaker language of L2 learners and heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 18, 274303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., and Perpiñán, S.. 2008. Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: the effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning 58, 503–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., and Ionin, T.. 2010. Transfer effects in the interpretation of definite articles by Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 449–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., and Ionin, T.. 2012. Dominant language transfer in Spanish heritage speakers and L2 learners in the interpretation of definite articles. Modern Language Journal 96(1), 7094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., and Perpiñan, S.. 2011. Assessing differences and similarities between instructed heritage language learners and L2 learners in their knowledge of Spanish tense-aspect and mood (TAM) morphology. Heritage Language Journal 8, 90133.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., and Sánchez-Walker, N.. 2013. Differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition 20, 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, N., and Hulk, A.. 2001. Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, V. A. 1997. The effect of modality on a grammaticality judgement task. Second Language Research 13, 3465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musolino, J., and Lidz, J.. 2006. Why children aren’t universally successful with quantification. Linguistics 44, 817–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. 2000. Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2011a. Lexical change and language contact: Faetar in Italy and Canada. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15, 366–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, N. 2011b. A multilingual corpus to explore geographic variation. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 43(1–2), 6584.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. 2016. Heritage languages as new dialects. In Côté, M.-H., Knooihuizen, R., and Nerbonne, J. (eds.), The Future of Dialects: Selected Papers from Methods in Dialectology XV, 1534. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, N., Aghdasi, N., Denis, D., and Motut, A.. 2011. Pro-drop in heritage languages: a cross-linguistic study of contact-induced change. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 17, 2.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, K. 2001. Prosody and information structure in Japanese: a case study of topic marker wa. In Akatsuka, N., Strauss, S., and Comrie, B. (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 10, 434–47. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Newman, Z. K. 2015. Discourse markers in the narratives of New York Hasidim: more V2 attrition. In Johannessen, J. B. and Salmons, J. C. (eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America, 178200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar