Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T18:01:50.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 22 - Challenging Issues in Surgical Ethics

Intraoperative Decision-Making, Innovative Surgery, and High-Risk Operations near the End of Life

from Section 2 - Consultation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2022

By
Darryl Schuitevoerder  and
Peter Angelos
Edited by
D. Micah Hester  and
Toby L. Schonfeld
D. Micah Hester
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine
Toby L. Schonfeld
Affiliation:
National Center for Ethics in Health Care, US Department of Veterans Affairs
Get access

Summary

For centuries, surgery and medicine existed in overlapping but different professional spheres, but of course, in modern medicine, this is no longer the case. Thus, surgery and surgical interventions are generally governed by the same ethical norms that govern most medical practice. However, how those norms are applied and balanced often differ between standard medical and surgical care.

Type
Chapter
Information
Guidance for Healthcare Ethics Committees , pp. 191 - 198
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. (2020). https://riskcalculator.facs.org/RiskCalculator/PatientInfo.jsp (accessed March 2020).Google Scholar
Bernard, HR, Hartman, TW. (1993). Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. American Journal of Surgery, 165(4): 533–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosk, C. (1979). Forgive and Remember. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Z, Mitchell, SL, Gorges, RJ, Rosenthal, RA, Lipsitz, SR, Kelley, AS (2015). Predictors of mortality up to 1 year after emergency major abdominal surgery in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 63(12): 2572–2579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karpowicz, L, Bell, E, Racine, E (2016). Ethics oversight mechanisms for surgical innovation: A systematic and comparative review of arguments. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(2): 135–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruser, JM, Taylor, LJ, Campbell, TC, et al. (2017). “Best case/worst case”: Training surgeons to use a novel communication tool for high-risk acute surgical problems. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 53(4): 711–719 e715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langerman, A, Siegler, M, Angelos, P (2016). Intraoperative decision making: The decision to perform additional, unplanned procedures on anesthetized patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 222(5): 956–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, PT, Frumovitz, M, Pareja, R, et al. (2018). Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 379(20): 1895–1904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reijers, W, Wright, D, Brey, P, et al. (2018). Methods for practising ethics in research and innovation: A literature review, critical analysis and recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5): 1437–1481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, LJ, Nabozny, MJ, Steffens, NM, et al. (2017). A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: Best case/worst case. JAMA Surgery, 152(6): 531–538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Food & Drug Administration. (2019). Caution when using robotically-asssisted surgical devices in women’s health including mastectomy and other cancer-related surgeries: FDA safety communication. www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/caution-when-using-robotically-assisted-surgical-devices-womens-health-including-mastectomy-and (accessed March 15, 2020).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×