Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T00:11:45.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Ethical Risks and Remedies in Social-Behavioral Research Involving Genetic Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2017

Susan Bouregy
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elena L. Grigorenko
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Stephen R. Latham
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Mei Tan
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Houston
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali-Khan, S. E., Krakowski, T., Tahir, R., & Daar, A. S. (2011). The use of race, ethnicity and ancestry in human genetic research. The HUGO Journal, 5, 4763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, E. E., Solomon, S., Heitman, E., DuBois, J. M., Fisher, C. B., Kost, R. G., et al. (2012). Research ethics education for community-engaged research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7, 319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annas, G. J., Glantz, L. H., & Roche, P. A. (1995). Drafting the Genetic Privacy Act: Science, policy, and practical considerations. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 23, 360366.Google Scholar
Austin, J., & Honer, W. (2005), The potential impact of genetic counseling for mental illness. Clinical Genetics, 67, 134142. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00330.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Mesman, J., Alink, L. R. A., & Juffer, F. (2008). Effects of an attachment-based intervention on daily cortisol moderated by DRD4: A randomized control trial on 1-3-year-olds screened for externalizing behavior. Development & Psychopathology, 20, 805820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, S. H., Brody, G. H., Lei, M., & Philibert, R. A. (2010). Differential susceptibility to parenting among African American youths: Testing the DRD4 hypothesis. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(5), 513521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885908.Google Scholar
Benner, A. D., Kretsch, N., Harden, K. P., & Crosnoe, R. (2014). Academic achievement as a moderator of genetic influences on alcohol use in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 11701178. doi:10.1037/a0035227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beskow, L. M., & Burke, W. (2009). Ethial issues in genetic epidemiology. In Coughlin, S. S., Beachamp, T. L., & Weed, D. L., Ethics and epidemiology (2nd ed., pp. 182193). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berkman, B. E., & Hull, S. C. (2014). The “right not to know” in the genomic era: Time to break from tradition? American Journal of Bioethics, 14, 2831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonham, V. L., Warshauer-Baker, E., & Collins, F. S. (2005). Race and ethnicity in the genome era: The complexity of the constructs. American Psychologist, 60(1), 915.Google Scholar
Brody, G. H., Chen, Y., Beach, S. R. H., Philibert, R. A., & Kogan, S. M. (2009). Participation in a family-centered prevention program decreases genetic risk for adolescents’ risky behaviors. Pediatrics, 124(3), 911917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvin, C. M., Deary, I. J., Webbink, D., Smith, P., Fernandes, C., Lee, S. H., et al. (2012). Multivariate genetic analyses of cognition and academic achievement from two population samples of 174,000 and 166,000 school children. Behavior Genetics, 42(5), 699710. doi:10.1007/s10519-012-9549-7Google Scholar
Chen, D. T., Miller, F. G., & Rosentstein, D. L. (2003). Ethical aspects of research into the etiology of autism. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disability Research Reviews, 9, 4853.Google Scholar
Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E., & Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature, 422, 835884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, G., Marioni, R. E., Liewald, D. C., Hill, W. D., & Hagenaars, S. P. (2016). Genome-wide association study of cognitive functions and educational attainment in UK biobank. Molecular Psychiatry, 21, 758767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). (2009). Title 45 Public welfare, Part 46, Code of Federal Regulations: Protection of human subjects. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htmlGoogle Scholar
DuBois, J., Baily-Curch, B., Bustillos, D., Campbell, J., Cottler, L., Fisher, C. B., et al. (2011). Ethical issues in mental health research: The case for community engagement. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 24(3), 208214.Google Scholar
Duster, T. (2005). Race and reification in science. Science, 307(5712), 10501051.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1992). The child’s right to an open future. In Feinberg, J. (Ed.), Freedom & fulfillment. Philosophical essays (pp. 7697). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (1999). Relational ethics and research with vulnerable populations. Reports on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity. Papers commissioned by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 2, 29–49. Retrieved October 26, 2009, from www.bioethics.gov/reports/past_commissions/nbac_mental2.pdf.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (2002). Participant consultation: Ethical insights into parental permission and confidentiality procedures for policy relevant research with youth. In Lerner, R. M., Jacobs, F., & Wertlieb, D. (Eds.), Handbook of applied developmental science. 4 (pp. 371396). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (2003). Adolescent and parent perspectives on ethical issues in youth drug use and suicide survey research. Ethics & Behavior, 13(4), 303332.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (2006a). Privacy and ethics in pediatric environmental health research – Part I: Genetic and prenatal testing. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 16171621.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (2006b). Privacy and ethics in pediatric environmental health research – Part II: Protecting families and communities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 114, 16221625.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (2013). Confidentiality and disclosure in non-intervention adolescent risk research. Applied Developmental Science. 17(2), 8893.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (2014a). Multicultural ethics in professional psychology practice, consulting, and training. In Leong, F. T. L. (Ed.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology, 2 (pp. 3557). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B. (2014b). HIV prevention research ethics: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(1), 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, C. B., Brunnquell, D. J., Hughes, D. L., Liben, L. S., Maholmes, V., Plattner, S., et al. (2013). Preserving and enhancing the responsible conduct of research involving children and youth: A response to proposed changes in federal regulations. Social Policy Report, 27(1), 1, 315.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B., Busch-Rossnagel, N. B., Jopp, D. S., & Brown, J. L. (2012). Applied developmental science, social justice and socio-political well-being. Applied Developmental Science, 16(1), 5464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, C. B., & Goodman, S. J. (2009). Goodness-of-fit ethics for non-intervention research involving dangerous and illegal behaviors. In Buchanan, D., Fisher, C. B., & Gable, L. (Eds.), Research with high-risk populations: Balancing science, ethics, and law (pp. 2546). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B., Higgins-D’Allesandro, A., Rau, J. M. B., Kuther, T., & Belanger, S. (1996). Referring and reporting research participants at risk: Views from urban adolescents. Child Development, 67, 20862099.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B., Hoagwood, K., Boyce, C., Duster, T., Frank, D. A., Grisso, T., et al. (2002). Research ethics for mental health science involving ethnic minority children and youth. American Psychology, 57, 10241040.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B., & McCarthy, E. L. (2013). Ethics in prevention science involving genetic testing [Special issue]. Prevention Science, 14(3), 310318.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B., & Ragsdale, K. (2006). A goodness-of-fit ethics for multicultural research. In Trimble, J. & Fisher, C. B. (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B., & Masty, J. K. (2006). Community perspectives on the ethics of adolescent risk research. In Leadbeater, B., Reicken, T., Benoit, C., Jansson, M., & Marshall, A. (Eds.), Research ethics in community-based and participatory action research with youth (pp. 2241). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. B., & Wallace, S. A. (2000). Through the community looking glass: Re-evaluating the ethical and policy implications of research on adolescent risk and sociopathology. Ethics and Behavior, 10(2), 99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazzetto, G., Di Lorenzo, G., Carola, V., Proietti, L., Sokolowska, E., Siracusano, A., et al. (2007) Early trauma and increased risk for physical aggression: The moderating role of MAOA. PLoS One, 2(5), e486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldenberg, A. J., Hartmann, C. D., Morello, L., Brooks, S., Colón-Zimmermann, K., & Marshall, P. A. (2013). Gene-environment interactions and health inequalities: Views of underserved communities. Journal of Community Genetics, 4(4), 425434. doi:10.1007/s12687-013-0143-3Google Scholar
Grandjean, P., & Sorsa, M. (1996). Ethical aspects of genetic predisposition to environmentally-related disease. Science of the Total Environment, 184, 3743.Google Scholar
Greven, C. U., Harlaar, N., Kovas, Y., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Plomin, R. (2009). More than just IQ: School achievement is predicted by self-perceived abilities – but for genetic rather than environmental reasons. Psychological Science, 20(6), 753763.Google Scholar
Hanscombe, K. B., Haworth, C. M. A, Davis, O. S. P., Jaffee, S. R., & Plomin, R. (2011). Chaotic homes and school achievement: A twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 52(11), 12121220. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02421.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haworth, C. M. A., & Plomin, R. (2012). Genetics and education: Toward a genetically sensitive classroom. In Harris, K., Graham, S., & Urdan, T. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Volume 1 – Theories, constructs and critical issues (pp. 529599). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13273-018Google Scholar
Heijmans, B. T., Tobi, E. W., Stein, A. D., Putter, H., Blauw, G. J., Susser, E. S., et al. (2008). Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(44), 1704617049.Google Scholar
Henderson, G. E. (2008). Introducing social and ethical perspectives on gene-environment. Sociological Methods & Research, 37, 251276.Google Scholar
Henderson, G. E., Juengst, E. T., King, N. M. P., Kuczynski, K., & Michie, M. (2012). What research ethics should learn from genomics and society research: Lessons from the ELSI Congress of 2011. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 40(4), 10081024. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00728.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Education Sciences. (2012). Fast facts. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=16.Google Scholar
Janvier, A., & Farlow, B. (2014). Arrogance-based medicine: Guidelines regarding genetic testing in children. American Journal of Bioethics, 14(3), 1516. doi:10.1080/15265161.2013.879951Google Scholar
Jarvik, G. P., Amendola, L. M., Berg, J. S., Brothers, K., Clayton, E. W., Chung, W., et al. (2014). Return of genomic results to research participants: The floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between. American Journal of Human Genetics, 94(6), 818826. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juengst, E. T. (2004). FACE facts: Why human genetics will always provoke bioethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 32(2), 267275.Google Scholar
Kellam, S. G., Brown, C. H., Poduska, J. M., Ialongo, N., Wang, W., Toyinbo, P., & Wilcox, H. C. (2008). Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, S5–S28. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L., Jokela, M., Hintsanen, M., Salo, J., Hintsa, T., Alatupa, S., et al. (2010). Does genetic background moderate the association between parental education and school achievement? Genes, Brain and Behavior, 9(3), 318324. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2009.00561.xGoogle Scholar
Kendler, K. S. (2005). “A gene for…”: The nature of gene action in psychiatric disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 12431252.Google Scholar
Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Taylor, A., Williams, B., Newcombe, R., Craig, I. W., et al. (2006). MAOA, maltreatment, and gene-environment interaction predicting children’s mental health: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 903913.Google Scholar
Krapohl, E. Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Pingault, J. B., et al. (2014). The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(42), 1527315278.Google Scholar
Laet, S., Colpin, H., Leeuwen, K., Noortgate, W. Claes, S. Janssens, A., et al. (2016). Transactional links between teacher-student relationships and adolescent rule-breaking behavior and behavioral school engagement: Moderating role of a dopaminergic genetic profile score. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 45, 12261244.Google Scholar
Levy, D., Splansky, G. L., Strand, N. K., Atwood, L. D., Benjamin, E. J., Blease, S., et al. (2010). Consent for genetic research in the Framingham Heart Study. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 152A(5), 12501256. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33377Google Scholar
Lippman, A. (1991). Prenatal genetic testing and screening: Constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 17, 1550.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Lewinger, J. P., Gilliland, F. D., Gauderman, W. J., & Conti, D. V. (2013). Confounding and heterogeneity in genetic association studies with admixed populations. American Journal of Epidemiology, 177(4), 351360. doi:10.1093/aje/kws234Google Scholar
Masty, J., & Fisher, C. B. (2008). A goodness of fit approach to parent permission and child assent pediatric intervention research. Ethics & Behavior, 13, 139160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musci, R. J., Bradshaw, C. P., Maher, B., Uhl, G. R., Kellam, S. G., & Ialongo, N. S. (2013). Reducing aggression and impulsivity through school-based prevention programs: A gene by intervention interaction. Prevention Science, 15(6), 831840. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0441-3Google Scholar
Ossorio, P. N., & Duster, T. (2005). Race and genetics: Controversies in biomedical, behavioral, and forensic sciences. American Psychologist, 60, 115128.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, C., & Fisher, C. B. (1997). The effect of confidentiality and reporting procedures on parent-child agreement to participate in adolescent risk research. Applied Developmental Science, 1, 185197.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., & Davis, O. S. (2009). The future of genetics in psychology and psychiatry: Microarrays, genome-wode association, and non-coding. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 6371.Google Scholar
Ravitsky V. & Wilfond B.S. (2006). Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. American Journal of Bioethics, 6, 8–17.Google Scholar
Rimfeld, K., Kovas, Y., Dale, P. H., & Plomin, R. (2015). Pleioropy across academic subjects at the end of compulsory education. Science Reports, 5, 112.Google Scholar
Salvatore, J. E., & Dick, D. M. (2015). Gene-environment interplay: Where we are, where we are going. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(2), 344350. doi:10.1111/jomf.12164Google Scholar
Schlomer, G. L., Cleveland, H. H., Vandenbergh, D. J., Fosco, G. M., & Feinberg, M. E. (2015). Looking forward in candidate gene research: Concerns and suggestions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(2), 351354. doi:10.1111/jomf.12165Google Scholar
Smedley, A. & Smedley, B. D. (2005). Race as biology is fiction, racism as a social problem is real: Anthropological and historical perspectives on the social construction of race. American Psychologist, 60, 1626.Google Scholar
Takezawa, Y., Kato, K., Oota, H., Caulfield, T., Fujimoto, A., Honda, S., et al. (2014). Human genetic research, race, ethnicity and the labeling of populations: Recommendations based on an interdisciplinary workshop in Japan. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(33), 15. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-33Google Scholar
Trimble, J., & Fisher, C. B. (2006). Our shared journey: Lessons from the past to protect the future. In Trimble, J. & Fisher, C. B. (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. xvxxix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Hart, S. A., Kovas, Y., Lukowski, S., Soden, B., Thompson, L. A., et al. (2014). Who is afraid of math? Two sources of genetic variance for mathematical anxiety. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 55(9), 10561064.Google Scholar
Wilfond, B., & Friedman Ross, L. F. (2009). From genetics to genomics: Ethics, policy, and parental decision-making. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(6), 639647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilmot, B., Fry, R., Smeester, L., Musser, E. D., Mill, J., & Nigg, J. T. (2016). Methylomic analysis of salivary DNA in childhood ADHD identifies altered DNA methylation in VIPR2. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 57, 152160.Google Scholar
Wolf, L. E., Bouley, T. A., & McCulloch, C. E. (2010). Genetic research with stored biological materials: Ethics and practice. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 32(2), 718.Google Scholar
Ziniel, S., Savage, S. K., Huntington, N., Amatruda, J., Green, R. C., Weitzman, E. R., et al. (2014). Parents’ preferences for returning results in pediatric genomic research. Public Health Genomics, 17(2), 105114. doi:10.1159/000358539Google Scholar
Ziv, E., & Burchard, E. G. (2003). Human population structure and genetic association studies. Pharmacogenomics, 4(4), 431441. doi:10.1517/phgs.4.4.431.22758Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×