Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:53:25.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Ethical Issues in Using Genomics to Influence Educational Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2017

By
Susan Bouregy  and
Krista Bouregy
Edited by
Susan Bouregy ,
Elena L. Grigorenko ,
Stephen R. Latham  and
Mei Tan
Susan Bouregy
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elena L. Grigorenko
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Stephen R. Latham
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Mei Tan
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Houston
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Genetics, Ethics and Education , pp. 309 - 324
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bednarek, E., & Caroni, P. (2011). B-Adducin is required for stable assembly of new synapses and improved memory upon environmental enrichment. Neuron, 69(6), 1132–1146.Google Scholar
Benzer, S. (1967). Behavioral mutants of Drosophila isolated by countercurrent distribution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 58, 1112–1119.Google Scholar
Boynton, S., & Tully, T. (1992). Latheo, a new gene involved in associative learning and memory in Drosophila melanogaster, identified from p element mutagenesis. Genetics, 131(3), 655–672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 793–795.Google Scholar
Donlea, J., Leahy, A., Thimgan, M. S., Suzuki, Y., Hughson, B. N., Sokolowski, M. B., et al. (2012). Foraging alters resilience/vulnerability to sleep disruption and starvation in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(7), 2613–2618.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feero, W. G. (2014). Clinical application of whole-genome sequencing: Proceed with care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311(10), 1017–1019.Google Scholar
Glanzman, D. L. (2008). New tricks for an old slug: The critical role of postsynaptic mechanisms in learning and memory in Aplysia. Progress in Brain Research, 169, 277–292.Google Scholar
Juengst, E. T., Flatt, M. A., & Settersten, R. A. (2012). Personalized genomic medicine and the rhetoric of empowerment. Hastings Center Report, 42(5), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahsai, L., & Zars, T. (2011). Learning and memory in Drosophila: Behavior, genetics and neural systems. International Review of Neurobiology, 99, 139–167.Google Scholar
Manoli, D. S., Foss, M., Villella, A., Taylor, B. J., Hall, J. C., & Baker, B. S. (2005). Male-specific fruitless specifies the neural substrates of Drosophia courtship behavior. Nature, 436(7049), 395–400.Google Scholar
McGuire, S. E., Deshazer, M., & Davis, R. L. (2005). Thirty years of olfactory learning and memory research in Drosophila melanogaster. Progress in Neurobiology, 76(5), 328–347.Google Scholar
Meyer, L. M. N., Bomfim, G. C., & El-Hani, C. N. (2013). How to understand the gene in the twenty-first century? Science and Education, 22, 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, T. H. (1988). The genetics of Drosophila. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Muschkin, C. G., Ladd, H. F., & Dodge, K. A. (2015). Impact of North Carolina’s early childhood initiatives on special education placements in third grade. Educational Evaluations and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 478–500.Google Scholar
Nagoshi, E., Sugino, K., Kula, E., Okazaki, E., Tachibana, T., Nelson, S., & Rosbash, M. (2010). Dissecting differential gene expression within the circadian neuronal circuit of Drosophila. Nature Neuroscience, 13(1), 60–68.Google Scholar
Parens, E. (2004). Genetic differences and human identities: On why talking about behavioral genetics is important and difficult. Hastings Center Report, 34(1), s4–35.Google Scholar
Pinto, S., Quintana, D. G., Smith, P., Mihalek, R. M., Hou, Z. H., Boynton, S., et al. (1999). Latheo encodes a subunit of the origin recognition complex and disrupt neuronal proliferation and adult olfactory memory when mutant. Neuron, 23, 45–54.Google Scholar
Podesta, J., Pritzker, P., Moniz, E. J., Holdren, J., & Zients, J. (2014). Big data: Seizing opportunities, preserving values. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/big_data_privacy_report_may_1_2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Powers, N. R., Eicher, J. D., Butter, F., Kong, Y., Miller, L. L., Ring, S. M., et al. (2013). Alleles of a polymorphic etv6 binding in dcdc2 confer risk of reading and language impairment. American Journal of Human Genetics, 93(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
Rietveld, C. A., Medland, S. E., Derringer, J., Yang, J., Esko, T., Martin, N. W., et al. (2013). Gwas of 126559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science, 340, 1467–1471.Google Scholar
Seife, C. (2013). 23andMe is terrifying, but not for the reasons the FDA thinks. Scientific American, SA Forum, November 27, 2013 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/Google Scholar
Strauss, V. (2013). Howard Gardner: “Multiple intelligences” are not “learning styles.” Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/10/16/howard-gardner-multiple-intelligences-are-not-learning-\styles/?tid=auto_completeGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J., Roehrig, A. D., Soden Hensler, B., Conner, C. M., & Schatschneider, C. (2010). Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading. Science, 328, 512–514.Google Scholar
Tully, T., & Quinn, W. G. (1985) Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutant Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 157, 263–277.Google Scholar
van Praag, H., Kempermann, G., & Gage, F. H. (2000). Neuronal consequences of environmental enrichment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(3), 191–198.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×