Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-09T10:09:08.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2022

Edited by
R. J. Hankinson  and
Matyáš Havrda
R. J. Hankinson
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Matyáš Havrda
Affiliation:
Czech Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Galen's Epistemology
Experience, Reason, and Method in Ancient Medicine
 , pp. 290 - 309
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Armstrong, D., and McOsker, M. (2020) Philodemus: On Anger. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Baffioni, G. (1954) ‘ Inediti di Archelao da un codice bolognese’, Bollettino dei classici greci e latini 3: 57–76.Google Scholar
Baffioni, G. (1958) ‘Scolii inediti di Palladio al De sectis di Galeno’, Bollettino dei classici greci e latini 6: 61–78.Google Scholar
Bardong, K. (1937) Galeni De causis procatarcticis libellus a Nicolao Regino in sermonem Latinum translatus. CMG Suppl. 2. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Bazou, A. (2011) Γαληνοῦ Ὅτι ταῖς τοῦ σώματος κράσεσιν αἱ τῆς ψυχῆς δυνάμεις ἕπονται. Athens.Google Scholar
Boudon, V. (2000) Galien, Tome II. Exhortation à l’etude de la médecine, Art medical. Paris.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (2007) Galien, Tome I. Introduction générale. Sur l’ordre de ses propres livres. Sur ses propores livres. Que l’excellent médecin est aussi philosophe. Paris.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V., and Pietrobelli, A. (2005) ‘Galien ressuscité: Édition princeps du texte grec du De propriis placitis ’, Revue des études grecques 118: 168–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V., Jouanna, J., and Pietrobelli, A. (2010) Galien, Tome IV. Ne pas se chagriner. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruns, I. (1887) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis praeter commentaria scripta minora: De anima liber cum mantissa. CAG Suppl. Arist. 2.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Busse, A. (1900) Eliae In Porphyrii Isagogen et Aristotelis Categorias commentaria. CAG 18.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Busse, A. (1904) Davidis Prolegomena et In Porphyrii Isagogen commentarium. CAG 18.2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Daneche-Pajuh, M. T. (1987) Al-Mantiqiyyāt li-al-Fārābī, vol. 1. Qom.Google Scholar
Daremberg, C. (1846) Traité sur le pouls attribué à Rufus d’Éphèse. Paris.Google Scholar
De Boer, W. (1937) Galeni De propriorum animi cuiuslibet affectuum dignotione et curatione, De animi cuiuslibet peccatorum dignotione et curatione, De atra bile. CMG 5.4.1.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1978–84) Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. (3 vols.). CMG 5.4.1.2. Berlin.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1992) Galeni De semine. CMG 5.3.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1996) Galeni De elementis ex Hippocratis sententia. CMG 5.1.2. Berlin.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H., and De Lacy, E. A. (1978) Philodemus: On Methods of Inference. Naples.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1930/1965) Die griechische Empirikerschule: Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre. Berlin and Zürich.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1879) ‘Θεόφραστου Περὶ αἰσθήσεων’, in Doxographi Graeci, ed. Diels, H., Berlin (repr. 1965): 499–527.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1915) ‘Galeni In Hippocratis Prorrheticum I commentaria III’, in Diels, Mewaldt, and Heeg (1915): 3–178.Google Scholar
Diels, H., Mewaldt, J., and Heeg, J. (1915) Galeni In Hippocratis Prorrheticum I commentaria III, De comate secundum Hippocratem, In Hippocratis Prognosticum commentaria III. CMG 5.9.2. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. F. (2003) ‘Theophrastus, On Sweat ’, in Theophrastus of Eresus, On Sweat, On Dizzines and On Fatigue, eds. Fortenbaugh, W. F., Sharples, R. W., Sollenberger, M. G.. PhA 93. Leiden and Boston: 24–48.Google Scholar
Fortuna, S. (1997) Galeni De constitutione artis medicae ad Patrophilum. CMG 5.1.3. Berlin.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J., and Wilkie, J. S. (1984) Galen on Respiration and the Arteries. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ġarāba, H. (1955) Al-Ašʿarī: The Book of Light Flashes on Sufism. Cairo.Google Scholar
Gärtner, F. (2015) Galeni De locis affectis I-II. CMG 5.6.1.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gundert, B. (2009) Galeni De symptomatum differentiis. CMG 5.5.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998b) Galen: On Antecedent Causes. CCTC 35. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2016) ‘Clement of Alexandria: Stromateis VIII (Liber logicus)’, in Havrda (2016): 79–127.Google Scholar
Hayduck, M. (1883) Sophoniae In libros Aristotelis de anima paraphrasis. CAG 23.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Heeg, J. (1915) ‘Galeni In Hippocratis Prognosticum commentaria III’, in Diels, Mewaldt, and Heeg (1915): 197–378.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1899) Themistii in libros Aristotelis De anima paraphrasis. CAG 5.3. Berlin.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (1893) Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta Minora, vol. 3. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (1901) Galenus: De optima corporis constitutione, idem De bono habitu. Hof.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (1904) Galeni De temperamentis libri III. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (1907–9) Galeni De usu partium libri XVII. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (1914) ‘Galeni In Hippocratis De victu acutorum’, in Mewaldt, Helmreich, and Westenberger (1914): 117–366.Google Scholar
Helmreich, G. (1923) ‘Galeni De alimentorum facultatibus libri tres’, in Koch, Helmreich, Kalbfleisch, and Hartlich (1923): 199–386.Google Scholar
Hude, K. (1958 2) Aretaeus. CMG 2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, C. (1896) Galeni Institutio logica. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, C. (1923) ‘Galeni De victu attenuante libellus’, in Koch, Helmreich, Kalbfleisch, and Hartlich (1923): 431–51.Google Scholar
Koch, K. (1923) ‘Galeni De sanitate tuenda libri VI’, in Koch, Helmreich, Kalbfleisch, and Hartlich (1923): 3–198.Google Scholar
Koch, K., Helmreich, G., Kalbfleisch, C., and Hartlich, O. (1923) Galeni De sanitate tuenda libri VI, De alimentorum facultatibus libri III, De bonis malisque sucis liber, De victu attenuante liber, De ptisana liber. CMG 5.4.2. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar
Koetschet, P. (2019) Abū Bakr Al-Rāzī: Doutes sur Galien. Scientia Graeco-Arabica 25. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollesch, J. (1964) Galeni De instrumentu odoratus. CMG Suppl. V. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kollesch, J., Nickel, D., and Strohmaier, G. (1969) Galeni De partibus artis medicativae, De causis contentivis libelli. CMG Suppl. Or. 2. Berlin: 113–41.Google Scholar
Kotzia, P. and Sotiroudis, P. (2010) ‘Γαληνοῦ Περὶ ἀλυπίας ’, Hellenika 60: 63–148.Google Scholar
Kraus, P. (1935) Jābir ibn Ḥayyān. Selected Texts. Cairo.Google Scholar
Kraus, P. (1939) ‘Kitāb al-Akhlāq li-Jālīnus’, Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts of the Egyptian University 5 (1937): 1–51.Google Scholar
Kühn, K. G. (1821–33) Claudii Galeni Opera omnia, volumen I–XX. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Laks, A., and Most, G. W. (2016) Early Greek Philosophy. (9 vols.). LCL 524–32. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lami, A., and Garofalo, I. (2012) Galeno. L’anima e il dolore. De indolentia. De propriis placitis. Milano.Google Scholar
Langhade, J., and Grignaschi, M. (1971) Al-Fārābī, Deux ouvrages inédits sur la rhétorique. Beirut.Google Scholar
Luria, S. (1970) Demokrit. Leningrad.Google Scholar
Lyons, M. (1969) Galeni De partibus artis medicativae, De causis contentivis, De diaeta in morbis acutis secundum Hippocratem libellorum versiones Arabicae. CMG Suppl. Or. 2. Berlin: 24–110.Google Scholar
Magnaldi, G. (1999) Claudii Galeni Περὶ ψυχῆς παθῶν καὶ ἁμαρτημάτων. Rome.Google Scholar
Marg, W. (1972) Timaeus Locrus: De natura mundi et animae. PhA 24. Leiden.Google Scholar
Marquardt, J. (1873) ‘Zu Galenos Περὶ ἀρίστης διδασκαλίας ’, Jahrbücher für classische Philologie 19: 389–97.Google Scholar
Marquardt, J. (1884) Claudii Galeni Pergameni Scripta minora, vol. 1. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mewaldt, J. (1914) ‘Galeni In Hippocratis De natura hominis commentaria III’, in Mewaldt, Helmreich, and Westenberger (1914): 1–113.Google Scholar
Mewaldt, J., Helmreich, G., and Westenberger, J. (1914) Galeni In Hippocratis De natura hominis, In Hippocratis De victu acutorum, De diaeta Hippocratis in morbis acutis. CMG 5.9.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Morani, M. (1987) Nemesii Emeseni De natura hominis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Nickel, D. (2001) Galeni De foetuum formatione. CMG 5.3.3. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nikitas, D. Z. (1990) Boethius, De topicis differentiis και οι βυζαντινές μεταφράσεις των Μανουήλ Ολοβόλου και Προχόρου Κυντώνη, Athens.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (1979) Galeni De praecognitione. CMG 5.8.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (1999) Galeni De propriis placitis. CMG 5.3.2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nutton, V., and Bos, G. (2011) Galen on Problematical Movements. CCTC 47. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Olivieri, A. (1914) Philodemi Περὶ παρρησίας. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Otte, C. (2001) Galen: De plenitudine. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Petit, C. (2009) Galien, Tome III: Le Médecin. Introduction. Paris.Google Scholar
Pfaff, F. (1956) ‘Galeni In Hippocratis sextum librum Epidemiarum commentaria VI–VIII’, in Wenkebach and Pfaff (1956): 323–507.Google Scholar
Pritchet, C. D. (1982) Iohannis Alexandrini Commentaria in librum de sectis Galeni. Leiden.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, F. (1956) ‘An Ancient Commentary on the Hippocratic Oath ’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 30: 52–87.Google Scholar
Al-Saqqā, A. H. (1987) Faḫr al-Dīn Al-Rāzī: Supreme Questions. Beirut.Google Scholar
Savage-Smith, E., Swain, S., and van Gelder, G. J. (2020) A Literary History of Medicine. The ʿUyūn al-anbāʾ fī ṭabaqāt al-aṭibbāʾ of Ibn Abī Uṣaybiʿah. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Al-Sayyid ʿAzmī, U. (1965) ʿAbd al-Ǧabbār: The Comprehensive Work on the [Divine] Imposition (Al-Muḥīṭ bi-al-taklīf). Cairo.Google Scholar
Schöne, H. (1907) ‘Markellinos’ Pulslehre. Ein griechisches Anekdoton’, in Festschrift zur 49. Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner. Basel: 448–72.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1973) ‘Epicurus, On Nature, Book XXVIII’, Cronache Ercolanesi 3: 5–84.Google Scholar
Sezgin, F. (2004) The Alexandrian Compendium of Galen’s Work: Jawāmiʿ al-Iskandarāniyyīn. Publications of the Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science. Series C. Facsimile Editions 68.3. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Strohmaier, G. (1970) Galeni De partium homoeomerium differentia libelli versio Arabica. CMG Suppl. Or. 3. Berlin.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Vagelpohl, U. (2016) Galeni In Hippocratis Epidemiarum librum II commentariorum I–VI versio Arabica. CMG Supp. Or. 5.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. J. (2000) Diocles of Carystus. Volume One, Text and Translation. SAM 22. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne.Google Scholar
von Müller, I. (1891) Claudii Galeni Pergameni scripta minora, vol. 2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (1989) Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wallies, M. (1891) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis In Aristotelis Topicorum libros octo commentaria. CAG 2.2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wallies, M. (1900) Themistii Analyticorum posteriorum paraphrasis. CAG 5.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (1944) Galen on Medical Experience: First edition of the Arabic version with English translation and notes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wendland, P. (1901) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis In librum De sensu commentarium. CAG 3.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wenkebach, E. (1934) ‘Galeni In Hippocratis primum librum Epidemiarum commentaria I–III ’, in Galeni In Hippocratis Epidemiarum librum I commentaria III, eds. Wenkebach, E. and Pfaff, F.. CMG 5.10.1. Leipzig and Berlin: 1–151.Google Scholar
Wenkebach, E. (1956) ‘Galeni In Hippocratis sextum librum Epidemiarum commentaria I–VI’, in Wenkebach and Pfaff (1956): 1–351.Google Scholar
Wenkebach, E., and Pfaff, F. (1956) Galeni In Hippocratis Epidemiarum librum VI commentaria I–VI et commentaria VI–VIII. CMG 5.10.2.2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (2013) Galien, Tome V: Sur les facultés des aliments. Paris.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Agnellus of Ravenna (1981) Lectures on Galen’s De Sectis. Latin Text and Translation by Seminar Classics 609. Arethusa Monographs 8. Buffalo.Google Scholar
Aouad, M., and Rashed, M. (1997) ‘L’exégèse de la Rhétorique d’Aristote: recherches sur quelques commentateurs grecs, arabes et byzantins, Ière partie’, Medioevo 23: 43–190.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (1968–88) Plotinus. Enneads. (7 vols). LCL 440–5, 468. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. (2 vols.). Princeton.Google Scholar
Biesterfeldt, H. H. (1973) Galens Traktat ‘Dass die Kräfte der Seele den Mischungen des Körpers folgen’ in arabischer Übersetzung. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. (2009) Galien: Méthode de traitement. Paris.Google Scholar
Brock, A. J. (1916) Galen on the Natural Faculties. LCL 71. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cerezo Magán, M. (2013) Galeno II. Patologías y su Tratamiento Terapeutico y Farmacológico. Leida.Google Scholar
Daremberg, C. (1854) Œuvres anatomiques, physiologiques et médicales de Galien, Tome I. Paris.Google Scholar
Daremberg, C. (1856) Œuvres anatomiques, physiologiques et médicales de Galien, Tome II. Paris.Google Scholar
Davies, D. (2013) ‘Character Traits’, in Singer (2013a): 135–201.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1978–84) Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato. (3 vols.). CMG 5.4.1.2. Berlin.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J., and Wilkie, J. S. (1984) Galen on Respiration and the Arteries. Princeton.Google Scholar
Gertz, S. (2018) Elias and David: Introductions to Philosophy. Olympiodorus: Introduction to Logic. Ancient Commentators on Aristotle. London.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991a) Galen: On the Therapeutic Method, Books I and II. Clarendon Later Ancient Philosophers. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, R. P., and Gaye, R. K. (1984) ‘Physics’, in The Complete Works of Aristotle, volume 1, ed. Barnes, J.. Princeton.Google Scholar
Johnston, I. (2006) Galen on Diseases and Symptoms. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnston, I. (2018) Galen: Hygiene, Books 5–6, Thrasybulus, On Exercise with a Small Ball. LCL 536. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar
Johnston, I., and Horsley, G. H. R. (2011) Galen: Method of Medicine. (3 vols.). LCL 516–518. Cambridge, MA, and London.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. S. (1964) Galen’s Institutio logica. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. (2 vols.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
May, M. T. (1968) Galen: On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body. (2 vols.). Ithaca.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A., and Woodruff, P. (1995) Plato: Phaedrus. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (2013) ‘Avoiding Distress’, in Singer (2013a): 77–99.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. (1998) ‘De l’expérience médicale’, in Galien, Traités philosophiques et logiques, eds. Pellegrin, P., Dalimier, C., Levet, J.-P.. Paris: 127–215.Google Scholar
Pfaff, F. (1934) ‘Galens Kommentare zum dem II. Buche der Epidemien des Hippokrates’, in Galeni In Hippocratis Epidemiarum librum I commentarii III, In Hippocratis Epidemiarum librum II commentarii V, eds. Wenkebach, E., Pfaff, F.. CMG 5.10.1. Berlin: 153–409.Google Scholar
Sālim, S. (1977) Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq, Galen’s Book On the Sects for Beginners (= De sectis, Arabic). Cairo.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, M. (2005) Hippocrates: Ancient Medicine. SAM 25. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W., and van der Eijk, P. J. (2008) Nemesius. On the Nature of Man. Translated Texts for Historians. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. E. (1976) Galen on the Affected Parts. Basel.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (1997) Galen: Selected Works. Oxford.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (ed.) (2013a) Galen: Psychological Writings. CGT. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (2013b) ‘The Diagnosis and Cure of the Affections and Errors Peculiar to Each Person’s Soul’, in Singer (2013a): 203–331.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (2013c) ‘The Capacities of the Soul Depend on the Mixture of the Body’, in Singer (2013a): 333–424.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N., and van der Eijk, P. J. (2018) Galen: Works on Human Nature, Volume 1: Mixtures. CGT. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle: Prior Analytics. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Towey, A. (2000) On Aristotle On Sense Perception. London.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. (2000) Diocles of Carystus. Volume One, Text and Translation. SAM 22. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verity, A. (2002) Theocritus: Idylls. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walzer, R., and Frede, M. (1985) Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Indianapolis and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (2013) Galien, Tome V: Sur les facultés des aliments. Paris.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. (2001) Cicero: On Moral Ends. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wright, J. (1924) ‘The Organ of Smell’, The Laryngoscope 34: 1–11.Google Scholar
ʿAbd al-Laṭīf, A. (1993) Minhaǧ imām al-Haramayn fī dirāsa al-ʿaqīda. Al-Riyāḍ.Google Scholar
Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J. (eds.) (2014) Philosophical Themes in Galen. Supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 114. London.Google Scholar
Adamson, P., and Pormann, P. E. (2017) Philosophy and Medicine in the Formative Period of Islam. London.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2001) Inference from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Angioni, L. (2014) ‘Aristotle on necessary principles and on explaining X through the essence of X’, Studia Philosophica Estonica 7: 88–112.Google Scholar
Angioni, L. (2016) ‘Aristotle’s definition of scientific knowledge (APo 71b 9-12)’, in Ancient Epistemology, eds. Ierodiakonou, K. and Hasper, P. S.. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 19. Münster: 79–105.Google Scholar
Annas, J., and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Scepticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Aouad, M. (1997) ‘La doctrine rhétorique d’Ibn Riḍwān et la Didascalia in Rhetoricam Aristotelis ex glosa Alpharabi ’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 7: 163–245.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., and McOsker, M. (2020) Philodemus: On Anger. Atlanta Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1952) ‘Sul valore di ἐπιλογίζομαι ἐπιλογισμος ἐπιλόγισις nel sistema epicureo’, Parola del Passato 7: 119–44.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1999) ‘Epicurean epistemology’, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds. Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 260–94.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2005) ‘Un personaggio in cerca di lettore: Galens Großer Puls und die Erfindung des Lesers’, in Antike Fachtexte = Ancient Technical Texts, ed. Fögen, T.. Berlin and New York: 21–39.Google Scholar
Auffret, T. (2019) ‘Approximation, métrétique et stochastique: le modèle platonicien de la médecine’, in Médecins et philosophes: une histoire, eds. Crignon, C. and Lefebvre, D.. Paris: 19–49.Google Scholar
Babbitt, F. C. (1928) ‘Introduction’, in Plutarch’s Moralia, Volume II: 86b–171f. LCL 222. Cambridge, MA, and London: 105–7.Google Scholar
Babut, D. (1975) ‘Histoire et réflexion morale dans l’œuvre de Plutarque’, Revue des Études Grecques 88: 206–19.Google Scholar
Barker, A. (1994) ‘Ptolemyʼs Pythagoreans, Archytas, and Platoʼs conception of mathematics’, Phronesis 39: 113–35.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982) ‘Medicine, experience, and logic’, in Barnes, Brunschwig, Burnyeat, and Schofield (1982): 24–68. Reprinted in Barnes (2012): 538–81.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1988) ‘Epicurean signs’, in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Supplementary Volume, eds. Annas, J. and Grimm, R. H.. Oxford: 94–134. Reprinted in Barnes (2014): 307–54.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1991) ‘Galen on logic and therapy’, in Kudlien and Durling (1991): 50–102. Reprinted in Barnes (2014): 218–73.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993) ‘Galen and the utility of logic’, in Galen und das hellenistische Erbe: Verhandlungen des IV. Internationalen Galen-Symposiums, eds. Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D.. Sudhoffs Archive, Beiheft 32. Stuttgart: 33–52. Reprinted in Barnes (2014): 11–34.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997) ‘Logique et pharmacologie. À propos de quelques remarques d’ordre linguistique dans le De simplicium medicamentorum temperamentis ac facultatibus de Galien’, in Debru (1997): 3–33. English trans. in Barnes (2014): 274–306.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003a) Porphyry: Introduction. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003b) ‘Proofs and syllogisms in Galen’, in Barnes and Jouanna (2003): 1–24. Reprinted in Barnes (2014): 198–217.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2012) Logical Matters: Essays in Ancient Philosophy II, ed. Bonelli, M.. Oxford Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2014) Proof, Knowledge, and Scepticism: Essays in Ancient Philosophy III, ed. Bonelli, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bruschwig, J., Burnyeat, M., and Schofield, M. (1982) Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., and Jouanna, J. (eds.) (2003) Galien et la Philosophie. Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 49. Vandœuvres, Genève.Google Scholar
Barton, T. S. (1994) Power and Knowledge: Astrology, Medicine, and Physiognomics under the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T., and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.) (2019) Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Berrey, M. (2017) Hellenistic Science at Court. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002) ‘Pre-Stoic hypothetical syllogistic in Galen’s Institutio Logica ’, in The Unknown Galen, ed. Nutton, V.. London: 57–72.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (2009) ‘Galen’s bios and methodos: from ways of life to path of knowledge’, in Gill, Whitmarsh, and Wilkins (2009): 175–89.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (2012a) Galien de Pergame: Un médecin grec à Rome. Paris.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (2012b) ‘Vision and vision disorders: Galen’s physiology of sight’, in Blood, Sweat and Tears – The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe, eds. Horstmanshoff, M., King, H., and Zittel, C.. Leiden: 551–67.Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (2014) ‘ Vlatadon 14 and Ambrosianus Q 3 Sup: two twin manuscripts’, in Galen’s De Indolentia: Essays on a Newly Discovered Letter, eds. Rothschild, C. K. and Thompson, T. W.. Tübingen: 41–56.Google Scholar
Bouras-Vallianatos, P. (2016) ‘Modelled on Archigenes theiotatos: Alexander of Tralles and his use of natural remedies (physika)’, Mnemosyne 69: 382–96.Google Scholar
Bouras-Vallianatos, P., and Xenophontos, S. (eds.) (2018) Greek Medical Literature and its Readers. From Hippocrates to Islam and Byzantium. London.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2005) ‘Common sense: concepts, definition and meaning in and out of the Stoa’, in Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, eds. Frede, D. and Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 164–209.Google Scholar
Bronstein, D. (2016) Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning. The Posterior Analytics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2002) ‘Sagehood and the Stoics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23: 181–224.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2014) The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood, and Socrates. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1980) ‘Can the sceptic live his scepticism?’, in Schofield, Burnyeat, and Barnes (1980): 20–53.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1981) ‘Aristotle on understanding knowledge’, in Aristotle on Science: Posterior Analytics, ed. Berti, E.. Padova: 97–140.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982) ‘Gods and heaps’, in Language and Logos. Studies in Ancient Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen, eds. Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 315–38.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (2005) ‘ΕΙΚΟΣ ΜΥΘΟΣ’, Rhizai 2: 7–29.Google Scholar
Capra, A., and Martinelli Tempesta, S. (2011) ‘Riding from Elea to Athens (via Syracuse): the Parmenides and the early reception of Eleatism: Epicharmus, Cratinus, and Plato’, Methexis 24: 135–75.Google Scholar
Cassels, I. (1991) ‘A brief note on Arabic equivalents to Galen’s ἔνδειξις’, in Kudlien and Durling (1991): 114–16.Google Scholar
Chase, M. (2015) ‘ Quod est primum in compositione est ultimum in resolutione. Notes on analysis and synthesis in Late Antiquity’, Anuario Filosófico 48: 103–39.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2009a) ‘Galen and Middle Platonism’, in Gill, Whitmarsh, and Wilkins (2009): 243–60.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2009b) ‘Le traité de Galien Sur la démonstration et sa postérité tardo-antique’, in Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism, eds. Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F.. PhA 115. Leiden and Boston: 43–77.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2013) ‘Universals in ancient medicine’, in Universals in Ancient Philosophy, eds. Chiaradonna, R. and Galluzzo, G., Rome: 381–423.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2014) ‘Galen on what is persuasive (pithanon) and what approximates to truth’, in Adamson, Hansberger, and Wilberding (2014): 61–88.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2019) ‘Galen and Middle Platonists on dialectic and knowledge’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou (2019): 320–49.Google Scholar
Cooper, G. (2016) ‘Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq’s Galen translations and Greco-Arabic philology: some observations from the Crises (De crisibus) and the Critical Days (De diebus decretoriis)’, Oriens 44: 1–43.Google Scholar
Coughlin, S., and Lewis, O. (2020) ‘Pneuma and the pneumatist school of medicine’, in The Concept of Pneuma after Aristotle, eds. Coughlin, S., Leith, D., and Lewis, O.. Berlin Studies in the Ancient World 61. Berlin: 203–36.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2019) ‘Dialectic in the early Peripatos’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou (2019): 47–81.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P., and Charles, D. (2011) ‘‘ΠΡΟΤΑΣΙΣ’ in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics ’, Phronesis 56: 193–203.Google Scholar
Daremberg, C. (1854) Œuvres anatomiques, physiologiques et médicales de Galien I. Paris.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1958) ‘Epicurean ΕΠΙΛΟΓΙΣΜΟΣ’, The American Journal of Philology 79: 179–83.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1979) ‘Galen’s concept of continuity’, Greek, Roman & Byzantine Studies 20: 355–69.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. H. (1991b) ‘Galen’s response to skepticism’, Illinois Classical Studies 16: 283–306.Google Scholar
Debru, A. (ed.) (1997) Galen on Pharmacology. Philosophy, History and Medicine. SAM 16. Leiden, New York, and Cologne.Google Scholar
Debru, A. (2008) ‘Physiology’, in Hankinson (2008a): 263–82.Google Scholar
Debru, A. (2014) ‘Γνώρισμα chez Galien. Vers une sémiologie de la santé’, in L’expressivité du lexique médical en Grèce et à Rome. Hommage à Françoise Skoda, eds. Boehm, I. and Rousseau, N.. Paris: 171–7.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1930/1965) Die griechische Empirikerschule. Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre. Berlin and Zürich.Google Scholar
Diano, C. (1946) Epicuri Ethica. Florence.Google Scholar
Dickerman, S. O. (1911) ‘Some stock illustrations of animal intelligence in Greek psychology’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 42: 123–30.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1974) Tre studi sull’aristotelismo nel II secolo d. C. Turin.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. (1984) ‘Byzantine Medicine in the Sixth and Seventh Centuries: Aspects of Teaching and Practice’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38: 21–7.Google Scholar
Erismann, C. (2017) ‘Meletius Monachus on individuality: a ninth-century Byzantine medical reading of Porphyry’s Logic’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 110: 37–60.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1980) ‘The original notion of cause’, in Schofield, Burnyeat, and Barnes (1980): 217–49.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1981) ‘On Galen’s epistemology’, in Galen of Pergamon, Problems and Propects, ed. Nutton, V.. London: 65–86. Reprinted in Frede (1987a): 279–98.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1985) ‘Introduction’, in Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Indianapolis: ix–xxxiv.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987a) Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987b) ‘The ancient Empiricists’, in Frede (1987a): 243–60.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1988) ‘The Empiricist attitude towards reason and theory’, in Hankinson (1988): 79–97.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1990) ‘An Empiricist view of knowledge: memorism’, in Epistemology, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge Companions to Ancient Thought 1. Cambridge: 225–50.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2011) ‘An anti-Aristotelian point of method in three Rationalist doctors’, in Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, eds. Ierodiakonou, K. and Morison, B.. Oxford: 115–38.Google Scholar
Furley, D. (1983) ‘The mechanics of Meteorologica IV: a prolegomenon to biology’, in Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum, eds. Moraux, P. and Wiesner, J.. Berlin: 73–93.Google Scholar
Garofalo, I. (1975) ‘Due passi del De experientia medica di Galeno’, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, Serie III, 5/4: 1305–6.Google Scholar
Garofalo, I. (1999) ‘Una nuova opera di Galeno: La Synopsis del De Methodo Medendi in versione araba’, Studi classici e orientali 47: 9–19.Google Scholar
Gärtner, F. (2015) Galeni De locis affectis I–II. CMG 5.6.1.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1981) Lo Scetticismo antico, II. Naples.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1983) ‘Did Chrysippus understand Medea?’, Phronesis 28: 136–49.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2010) Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.) (2009) Galen and the World of Knowledge. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giovacchini, J. (2012) L’Empirisme d’Épicure. Paris.Google Scholar
Giovacchini, J., Darras, C., Delattre, D., and Delattre-Biencourt, J. (2010) ‘Vocabulaire de l’épicurisme’, in Les Épicuriens, eds. Delattre, D. and Pigeaud, J.. Paris: 1425–60.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (2009) ‘Shock and awe: the performance dimension of Galenʼs anatomy demonstrations’, in Gill, Whitmarsh, and Wilkins (2009): 85–114.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) ‘ Probabile, veri simile and related terms’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 115–43.Google Scholar
Goichon, A.-M., and Goldziher, I. (1965) ‘Dahriyya’, Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition, vol. II. Leiden: 95–7.Google Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, A. (1995) ‘Aristotle’s “right reason”‘, Apeiron 28: 15–34.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. E. (1995) ‘Al-Rāzī’, Enclyclopedia of Islam, 2nd edition, vol. VIII. Leiden: 474–477.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1992) ‘Ein sprachlicher Zufall und seine Folgen. “Wahrscheinliches” bei Karneades und bei Cicero’, in Zum Umgang mit fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Antike, eds. Müller, C. W., Sier, K., and Werner, J.. Palingenesia 36. Stuttgart: 159–71.Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. G. (1991) ‘Love as disease’, in Atlantis and Egypt, with Other Selected Essays, ed. idem: 60–7.Google Scholar
Grönroos, G. (2001) Plato on Perceptual Cognition. PhD diss. Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (1998) Greek Thought, Arabic Culture. The Graeco-Arabic Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ʿAbbāsid Society (2nd–4th/8th–10th centuries). London and New York.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. (1978) ‘Early Hellenistic theories of vision and the perception of colour’, in Studies in Perception, eds. Machamer, P. K. and Turnbull, R. G.. Columbus: 60–95.Google Scholar
Hani, J. (1972) Plutarque: Consolation à Apollonios. Paris.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1987a), ‘Evidence, externality and antecedence: inquiries into later Greek causal concepts’, Phronesis 32: 80–100.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1987b) ‘Causes and empiricism’, Phronesis 32: 329–48.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) (1988) Method, Medicine and Metaphysics. Apeiron Suppl. Vol. 22.1. Edmonton.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1989) ‘Galen and the best of all possible worlds’, Classical Quarterly 39: 206–27.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991a) Galen: On the Therapeutic Method, Books I and II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991b) ‘A purely verbal dispute? Galen on Stoic and Academic philosophy’, Revue internationale de philosophie 3: 267–300.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991c) ‘Galen on the foundations of science’, in López Férez (1991): 15–29.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991d) ‘Galen’s anatomy of the soul’, Phronesis 36: 197–233.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1991e) ‘Greek medical models of mind’, in Philosophy of Mind, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge Companions to Ancient Thought 2. Cambridge: 194–217.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1993) ‘Actions and passions: affection, emotion, and moral self-management in Galen’s philosophical psychology’, in Passions and Perceptions, eds. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M.. Cambridge: 184–222.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1994a) ‘Galen’s theory of causation’, ANRW II.37.2: 1757–74.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1994b) ‘Galen’s concept of scientific progress’, ANRW II.37.2: 1775–89.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1994c). ‘Usage and abusage: Galen on language’, in Language, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge Companions to Ancient Thought 3. Cambridge: 166–87.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1995a) ‘The growth of medical empiricism’, in Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions, ed. Bates, D.. Cambridge: 60–83.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1995b) The Sceptics. The Arguments of the Philosophers. London.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1997) ‘Natural criteria and the transparency of judgement: Antiochus, Philo and Galen on epistemological justification’, in Assent and Argument: studies in Cicero’s Academic Books, eds. Inwood, B., and Mansfeld, J.. Leiden: 161–216.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998a) Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998b) Galen: On Antecedent Causes. CCTC 35. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2003) ‘Causation in Galen’, in Barnes and Jouanna (2003): 31–72.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2007) ‘Self-refutation and the sorites’, in Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, ed. Scott, D.. Oxford: 351–73.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) (2008a) The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2008b) ‘The man and his work’, in Hankinson (2008a): 1–33.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2008c) ‘Epistemology’, in Hankinson (2008a): 157–83.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2008d) ‘Philosophy of nature’, in Hankinson (2008a): 210–41.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2009) ‘Galen on the limitations of knowledge’, in Gill, Whitmarsh, and Wilkins (2009): 206–42.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2014a) ‘Galen on the ontology of powers’, in Causing Health and Disease in Classical and Late Antiquity, ed. Marmodoro, A.. British Journal of the History of Philosophy 22, Special Issue 2014. Abingdon: 951–73.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2014b) ‘Partitioning the soul: Galen on the anatomy of the psychic functions and mental illness’, in Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz, eds. Corcilius, K. and Perler, D.. Berlin: 85–106.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2015) ‘Galen on Hippocratic physics’, in Ancient Concepts of the Hippocratic: Papers Presented at the XIIIth International Hippocrates Colloquium, eds. Dean-Jones, L. and Rosen, R.. Leiden: 405–27.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2017) ‘Substance, element, quality, mixture: Galen’s physics and his Hippocratic inheritance’, in Aitia 7 (on-line: http://aitia.revues.org/1863).Google Scholar
Harig, G. (1974) Bestimmung der Intensität im medizinischen System Galens. Ein Beitrag zur theoretischen Pharmakologie, Nosologie und Therapie in der Galenischen Medizin. Berlin.Google Scholar
Harig, G. (1976) ‘Der Begriff der lauen Wärme in der theoretischen Pharmakologie Galens. Beziehungen zwischen Medizin und Mathematik in der Antike’, NTM. Schriftenreihe für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 13: 70–6.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R. S. (1973) The Heart and the Vascular System in Ancient Greek Medicine – from Alcmaeon to Galen. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hau, L. I. (2014) ‘Stock situations, topoi and the Greekness of Greek historiography’, in Defining Greek Narrative, eds. Cairns, D. and Scodel, R.. Edinburgh: 241–59.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2011) ‘Galenus christianus? The doctrine of demonstration in Stromata VIII and the question of its source’, Vigiliae Christianae 65: 343–75.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2015) ‘The purpose of Galen’s treatise On Demonstration ’, Early Science and Medicine 20: 265–87.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2016) The So-Called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria: Early Christian Reception of Greek Scientific Methodology. PhA 144. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2017) ‘Body and cosmos in Galen’s account of the soul’, Phronesis 62: 69–89.Google Scholar
Hills, A. (2009) ‘Moral testimony and moral epistemology’, Ethics 120: 94–127.Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. and Remes, U. (1974) The Method of Analysis. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1995) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on medicine as a stochastic art’, in van der Eijk, Horstmanshoff, and Schrijvers (1995): 473–86.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1999) ‘Galen’s criticism of the Aristotelian theory of colour vision’, in Antiaristotelismo, eds. Natali, C. and Maso, S.. Amsterdam: 123–41.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2002) ‘Zeno’s Arguments’, in The Philosophy of Zeno, eds. Scaltsas, T. and Mason, A.. Larnaka: 81–112.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2014) ‘On Galen’s theory of vision’, in Adamson, Hansberger, and Wilberding (2014): 235–47.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2019a) ‘Two puzzles in post-Aristoelian theories of vision’, in Perception and the History of Philosophy, eds. Glenney, B. and Silva, J. F.. London: 69–80.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2019b) ‘Theophrastus on Plato’s theory of vision’, Rhizomata 7: 249–68.Google Scholar
Jacques, J.-M. (1997) ‘La méthode de Galien pharmacologue dans les deux traités sur les médicaments composés (Περὶ συνθέσεως φαρμάκων)’, in Debru (1997): 103–29.Google Scholar
Kassel, R. (1958) Untersuchungen zur griechischen und römischen Konsolationsliteratur. Munich.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. H. (2014) ‘Galen on the therapy of distress and limits of emotional therapy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47: 275–96.Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. H. (2017) ‘Galen on reason and appetite: a study of the De moribus ’, Apeiron 50: 367–92.Google Scholar
King, D. (2018) Experiencing Pain in Imperial Greek Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Koetschet, P. (2015) ‘Galien, al-Rāzī, et l’éternité du monde: les fragments du traité Sur la démonstration, IV, dans les Doutes sur Galien ’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 25: 167–98.Google Scholar
Koetschet, P. (2017a) ‘Abū Bakr al-Rāzī et le signe: fragment retrouvé d’un traité logique perdu’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 27: 75–114.Google Scholar
Koetschet, P. (2017b) ‘Abū Bakr al-Rāzī on vision’, in Adamson and Pormann (2017): 170–89.Google Scholar
Koetschet, P. (2018) ‘Al-Rāzī, the clinician’, in 1001 Cures. Contributions in Medicine and Healthcare from Muslim Civilisation, ed. Pormann, P. E.. London: 146–53.Google Scholar
Koetschet, P. (2019) Abū Bakr Al-Rāzī, Doutes sur Galien. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kotzia, P. (2012) ‘Galen, περὶ ἀλυπίας: title, genre and two cruces’, in Studi sul De indolentia di Galeno, ed. Manetti, D.. Pisa: 69–91.Google Scholar
Kraus, P. (1935) Jābir ibn Ḥayyān. Selected Texts. Cairo.Google Scholar
Kraus, P. (1936) Al-Bīrūnī, Épître de Beruni contenant le répertoire des ouvrages de Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi. Paris.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. (1965) ‘Dogmatische Ärzte’, Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft: Supplementband 10: 179–80.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. (1991) ‘Endeixis as a scientific term: A) Galen’s usage of the word (in medicine and logic)’, in Kudlien and Durling (1991): 103–11.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F., and Durling, R. (eds.) (1991) Galen’s Method of Healing. SAM 1. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. (1974) Wissenschaft und Methode. Interpretationen zur aristotelischen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. (2004) ‘Aristotelian dynamics in the 2nd century school debates: Galen and Alexander of Aphrodisias on organic powers and movements’, in Philosophy, Science and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries, vol. 1, eds. Adamson, P., Baltussen, H., and Stone, M. W. F.. London: 71–95.Google Scholar
Kupreeva, I. (2014) ‘Galen’s theory of elements’, in Adamson, Hansberger, and Wilberding: 153–96.Google Scholar
Kuriyama, S. (1999) The Expressiveness of the Body and the Divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine. New York.Google Scholar
Le Coz, R. (2004) Les Médecins Nestoriens au Moyen Âge. Paris.Google Scholar
Leith, D. (2014) ‘Galen’s refutation of atomism’, in Adamson, Hansberger, and Wilberding (2014): 213–34.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (1994) ‘Aristotelian problems’, Ancient Philosophy 14, 53–77.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (2001) Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (2015) ‘Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and the Aristotelian Problemata’, in Mayhew (2015): 36–60.Google Scholar
Letts, M. (2014) ‘Rufus of Ephesus and the patient’s perspective in medicine’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22: 996–1020.Google Scholar
Letts, M. (2018) ‘Mental perceptions and pathology in the work of Rufus of Ephesus’, in Thumiger and Singer (2018): 176–97.Google Scholar
Levin, S. B. (2014) Plato’s Rivalry with Medicine. A Struggle and its Dissolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. (2016) ‘The practical application of ancient pulse-lore and its influence on the patient-doctor interaction’, in Petridou and Thumiger (2016): 345–63.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. (2018) ‘Archigenes of Apamea’s treatment of mental diseases’, in Thumiger and Singer (2018): 143–75.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. (forthcominga) ‘Pain in the diagnostic theory of Archigenes of Apamea’, in Pain in the Ancient World, eds. D. King, H. Baltussen, and J. Clarke. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lewis, O. (forthcomingb) ‘Galen on the Pulse: Theory and Method’, in Oxford Handbook of Galen, eds. J. Laskaris, R. Rosen, and P. N. Singer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996) ‘Theories and practices of demonstration in Galen’, in Rationality in Greek Thought, eds. Frede, M. and Striker, G.. Oxford: 255–77.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2005) ‘Mathematics as a model of method in Galen’, in Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, ed. Sharples, R. W.. London: 110–30.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2008) ‘Galen and his contemporaries’, in Hankinson (2008a): 34–48.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. (2 vols.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
López Férez, J. A. (ed.) (1991) Galeno: obra, pensamiento e influencia. Madrid.Google Scholar
Lord, E. (2018) ‘How to learn about morality and aesthetics through acquaintance and deference’, Oxford Studies in Metaethics 13: 71–97.Google Scholar
Lyons, M. (1969) ‘Prefaces’ in Galeni De partibus artis medicativae, De causis contentivis, De diaeta in morbis acutis secundum Hippocratem libellorum versiones Arabicae. CMG Suppl. Or. 2. Berlin: 8–21.Google Scholar
MacDonald, G. C. (2009) Concepts and Treatments of Phrenitis in Ancient Medicine. PhD diss. Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Malink, M. (2017) ‘Aristotle on principles as elements’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 53: 163–213.Google Scholar
Manetti, D. (2006) ‘La terminologie du livre: à propos des emplois d’ ὕφος et ἔδαφος dans deux passages de Galien’, Revue des études grecques 119: 157–71.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1988) ‘ Diaphonia: the argument of Alexander de Fato Chs. 1-2’, Phronesis 33: 181–207.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990a) ‘Chrysippus and the Placita ’, Phronesis 34: 311–42. Reprinted in Mansfeld and Runia (2010): 125–57.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1990b) ‘Doxography and dialectic: The Sitz im Leben of the Placita ’, ANRW II 36.4: 3056–229.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. T. (2010) Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Volume III: Studies in the Doxographical Traditions of Ancient Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Marelli, C. (1981) ‘La medicina empirica ed il suo sistema epistemologico’, in Giannantoni (1981): 657–76.Google Scholar
Mattern, S. (2008) Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Mattern, S. (2013) The Prince of Medicine: Galen in the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Matthen, M. (1988) ‘Empiricism and ontology in ancient medicine’, Apeiron 21: 99–121.Google Scholar
Mau, J. (1960) Galen. Einführung in die Logik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Mavroudis, A. (2000) Αρχιγένης Φιλίππου Απαμεύς. Ο βίος και τα έργα ενός Έλληνα γιατρού στην αυτοκρατορική Ρώμη. Athens.Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. (ed.) (2015) The Aristotelian Problemata Physica: Philosophical and Scientific Investigations. Leiden.Google Scholar
McGrath, S. (2009) ‘The puzzle of pure moral deference’, Philosophical Perspectives 23: 321–44.Google Scholar
Meeusen, M. (2018) ‘Aristotelian natural problems and imperial culture: selective readings’, ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole). Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition 12: 28–47.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (2002) ‘Plato and the method of analysis’, Phronesis 47: 193–223.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (2015) ‘Democritus, Aristotle, and the Problemata’, in Mayhew (2015): 10–35.Google Scholar
Misch, G. (1950) A History of Autobiography in Antiquity, trans. Dickes, E. W.. Harvard.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2008a) ‘Logic’, in Hankinson (2008a): 66–115.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2008b) ‘Language’, in Hankinson (2008a): 116–56.Google Scholar
Al-Naššār, A. S. (1978) Manāhiǧ al-baḥṯ ʿinda mufakkirī al-islām wa naqḍ al-muslimīn li-al-manṭiq al-arisṭūṭālīsī. Cairo.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (1972) ‘Galen and medical autobiography’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 198: 50–62.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (ed.) (1981) Galen of Pergamon, Problems and Propects. London.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (1991) ‘Style and content in the Method of Healing’, in Kudlien and Durling (1991): 1–25.Google Scholar
Overwien, O. (2012) ‘The art of the translator, or: how did Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq and his school translate?’, in Epidemics in Context: Greek Commentaries on Hippocrates in the Arabic Tradition, ed. Pormann, P.. Berlin: 151–70.Google Scholar
Overwien, O. (2019) Medizinische Lehrwerke aus dem spätantiken Alexandria. Die Tabulae Vindoboneses und Summaria Alexandrinorum zu Galens De sectis. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. (2004) ‘Scepticisme et sémiologie médicale’, in De Zénon d’Élée à Poincaré, eds. Morelon, R. and Hasnawi, A.. Louvain and Paris: 645–64.Google Scholar
Perilli, L. (2004) Menodoto di Nikomedia: Contributo a una storia galeniana di medicina empirica con una raccolta commentata delle testimonianze. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Petit, C. (2010) ‘La tradition manuscrite du traité des Simples de Galien. Editio princeps et traduction annotée des chapitres 1 à 3 du livre I’, in Storia della tradizione e edizione dei medici greci : atti del VI Colloquio internazionale, Paris, 12-14 aprile 2008, eds. Boudon-Millot, V., Jouanna, J., Garzya, A., and Roselli, A.. Naples: 143-165.Google Scholar
Petit, C. (2017) ‘Galen, pharmacology and the boundaries of medicine: a reassessment’, in Collecting Recipes: Byzantine and Jewish Pharmacology in Dialogue, eds. Lehmhaus, L. and Martelli, M.. Science, Technology and Medicine in Ancient Cultures 4. Boston and Berlin: 51–79.Google Scholar
Petit, C. (2018) Galien de Pergame ou La rhétorique de la providence: médecine, littérature et pouvoir à Rome. Leiden.Google Scholar
Petridou, G., and Thumiger, C. (eds.) (2016) Homo Patiens: Approaches to the Patient in the Ancient World. SAM 45. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Pietrobelli, A. (2009) ‘Le modèle des démonstrations géométriques dans la médecine de Galien’, Bulletin de l’association Guillaume Budé 2: 110–30.Google Scholar
Pino Campos, L. M. (2006) ‘Observaciones al tratado de Galeno Acerca de la diferencia de los pulsos ’, Fortunatae 17: 99–115.Google Scholar
Pormann, P. (2008) ‘Introduction’, in Rufus of Ephesus: On Melancholy. Tübingen: 3–24 Google Scholar
Pormann, P. (2014) ‘New fragments from Rufus of Ephesus’ On Melancholy ’, Classical Quarterly 64: 649–56.Google Scholar
Quarantotto, D. (2020) ‘Aristotle on science as problem-solving’, Topoi 39: 857–68.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2015) Al-Ḥasan ibn Mūsā al-Nawbaḫtī: Commentary on Aristotle, De generatione et corruptione. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rashed, R. (2017) Lexique historique de la langue scientifique arabe. Hildesheim, Zürich, and New York.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2003) Marcus Tullius Cicero: Topica. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2011) ‘Galen on unsayable properties’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 297–317.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2019) ‘Pithana and probabilia’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou (2019): 218–53.Google Scholar
Remes, P. (2014) ‘Plato: interaction between the external body and the perceiver in the Timaeus ’, in Active Perception in the History of Philosophy. From Plato to Modern Philosophy, eds. Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M.. Dordrecht: 9–30.Google Scholar
Remes, U. (1978) ‘Galen and the analytical method’, Ajatus 37: 3–27.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1936) ‘Analysis in Greek geometry’, Mind 45: 464–773. Reprinted in Robinson (1969): 1–15.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1969) Essays in Greek Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Roby, C. (2016) ‘Galen on the patient’s role in pain diagnosis: sensation, consensus, and metaphor’, in Petridou and Thumiger (2016): 304–22.Google Scholar
Rocca, J. (2003) Galen on the Brain. Anatomical Knowledge and Physiological Speculation in the Second Century AD. Leiden.Google Scholar
Rocca, J. (2006) ‘“Plato will tell you”: Galen’s use of the Phaedrus in De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis IX’, in Reading Plato in Antiquity, eds. Tarrant, H. and Baltzly, D.. London: 49–59.Google Scholar
Roselli, A. (2015) ‘Come dire il dolore. Galeno e il linguaggio dei medici e dei malati’, Antiquorum Philosophia 9: 55–68.Google Scholar
Rothschild, C. K. (2014) ‘Hocus pocus, Galenʼs On Prognosis, and the Gospel of Mark’, in Credible or Incredible? Report and Reception of Miraculous Occurrences in the Ancient World, eds. Nicklas, T. and Spittler, J.. Tübingen: 107–42.Google Scholar
Rubarth, S. (forthcoming) ‘Rethinking the Stoic theory of visual perception’.Google Scholar
Savage-Smith, E. (2002) ‘Galen’s lost ophthalmology and the Summaria Alexandrinorum ’, in The Unknown Galen, ed. Nutton, V.. Supplement to the Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 77. London: 121–138.Google Scholar
Scade, P. (2017) ‘Music and the soul in Stoicism’, in Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill, eds. Seaford, R., Wilkins, J., and Wright, M.. Oxford: 197–218.Google Scholar
Schlange-Schöningen, H. (2003) Die römische Gesellschaft bei Galen. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1996) ‘Epilogismos: an appraisal’, in Rationality in Greek Thought, eds. Frede, M. and Striker, G.. Oxford: 221–39.Google Scholar
Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M., and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1980) Doubts and Dogmatism. Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schwarb, G. (2017) ‘Early Kalām and the medical tradition’, in Adamson and Pormann (2017): 104–69.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1973) ‘Epicurus, On Nature, Book XXVIII’, Cronache Ercolanesi 3: 5–84.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1977) ‘Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic philosophy’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 23: 74–120.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1982) ‘On signs’, in Barnes, Brunschwig, Burnyeat, and Schofield (1982): 239–72.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1992) ‘Empedocles’ theory of vision and Theophrastus’ De sensibus ’, in Theophrastus. His Psychological, Doxographical and Scientific Writings, eds. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D.. New Brunswick and London: 20–31.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. E. (1970) Galen on Sense Perception. Basel and New York.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (1991) ‘Aspects of Galen’s Platonism’, in López Férez (1991): 41–55.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (ed.) (2013) ‘ Character Traits: Introduction’, in: Galen: Psychological Writings, ed. Singer, P. N.. CGT. Cambridge: 109–34.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N. (2020) ‘A change in the substance: theory and its limits in Galen’s Simples ’, Archives Internationales d?Histoire des Sciences 70 (special issue eds. M. Martelli, C. Petit, and L. Raggetti): 16–53.Google Scholar
Singer, P. N., and van der Eijk, P. J. (2018) Galen: Works on Human Nature, Volume 1: Mixtures. CGT. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1964) Die Physik der Theophrast. Bad Homburg, Berlin, and Zürich.Google Scholar
Strohmaier, G. (1998) ‘Bekannte und unbekannte Zitate in den Zweifeln an Galen des Rhazes’, in Text and Tradition: Studies in Ancient Medicine and its Transmission Presented to Jutta Kollesch, eds. Fischer, K. D., Nickel, D., and Potter, P.. Leiden: 263–87.Google Scholar
Stok, F. (2018) ‘Medical sects: Herophilus, Erasistratus, Empiricists’, in The Oxford Handbook of Science and Medicine in the Classical World, eds. Keyser, P. and Scarborough, J.. Oxford: 417–42.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2000) Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science, and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thumiger, C., and Singer, P. N. (eds.) (2018) Mental Illness in Ancient Medicine: From Celsus to Paul of Aegina. SAM 50. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (1995) ‘Dialectic and science: Galen, Herophilus and Aristotle on phenomena’, in van der Eijk, Horstmanshoff, and Schrijvers (1995), vol. 2: 487–95.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (1996a) ‘Galen’s concept of dialectic and the Middle Platonist background. The argument of PHP book II’, in Studi di storia della medicina antica e medievale in memoria di Paola Manuli, eds. Vegetti, M. and Gastaldi, S.. Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’ Università di Pavia 79. Pavia: 49–65.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (1996b) Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books II–III. PhA 68. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (2002) ‘Galen on the seat of the intellect: anatomical experiment and philosophical tradition’, in Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture, eds. Tuplin, C. J. and Rihll, T. E.. Oxford: 256–73.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (2003) Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. PhA 94. Leiden.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (2008) ‘Methodology’, in Hankinson (2008a): 49–65.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (2009) ‘Galen and the Stoics, or: the art of not naming’, in Gill, Whitmarsh, and Wilkins (2009): 282–99.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (2011) ‘Galen on perception’, Antiquorum Philosophia 5: 83–97.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (2018) ‘Galen and doxography’, in Aëtiana IV: Papers of the Melbourne Colloquium on Ancient Doxography, eds. Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D.. PhA 148. Leiden: 452–71.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. L. (2020) ‘Galen’s self-understanding and the Platonic Phaedrus ’, in Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedrus, eds. Delcomminette, S., D’Hoine, P., and Gavray, M.-A.. Berlin: 20–39.Google Scholar
Todd, R. B. (1974) ‘ΣΥΝΕΝΤAΣΙΣ and the Stoic theory of perception’, Grazer Beiträge 2: 251–61.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2007) The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ullmann, M. (1970) Die Medizin im Islam. Leiden and Cologne.Google Scholar
Ullmann, M. (2002) Wörterbuch zu den griechisch-arabischen Übersetzungen des 9. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Vagelphol, U. (2018) ‘The user-friendly Galen. Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq and the adaptation of Greek medicine for a new audience’, in Bouras-Vallianatos and Xenophontos (2018): 113–30.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. J. (1997) ‘Galen’s use of the concept of ‘qualified experience’ in his dietetic and pharmacological works’, in Debru (1997): 35–57. Reprinted in van der Eijk (2005): 279–98.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. (2005) Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. (2008) ‘Therapeutics’, in Hankinson (2008a): 283–303.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. (2009) ‘“Aristotle! What a thing for you to say!” Galen’s engagement with Aristotle and Aristotelians’, in Gill, Whitmarsh, and Wilkins (2009): 261–81.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. (2010) ‘Galens Auseinandersetzung mit Aristoteles’ Ansichten zum Gesichts- und Geruchssinn’, in Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption, eds. Althoff, J., Föllinger, S., and Wöhrle, G.. Trier: 81–107.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J, (2014) ‘Galen on the nature of human beings’, in Adamson, Hansberger, and Wilberding (2014): 89–134.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. J. (2015) ‘Galen on the assessment of bodily mixtures’, in The Frontiers of Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden, eds. Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D.. Berlin: 675–98.Google Scholar
van der Eijk, P. J., Horstmanshoff, H. F. J., and Schrijvers, P. J. (eds.) (1995) Ancient Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context. Papers Read at the Congress at Leiden University, 13–15 April 1992. (2 vols.). Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
van Ess, J. (1970) ‘The logical structure of Islamic theology’, in Logic in Classical Islam, ed. von Grunebaum, G. E.. Wiesbaden: 21–50.Google Scholar
van Ophuijsen, J. (1994) ‘Where have the topics gone?’, in Peripatetic Rhetoric After Aristotle, eds. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Mirhady, D. C.. Rutgers Studies in Classical Humanities 6. New Brunswick and London: 131–73.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1986) ‘Tradizione e verità: forme della storiografia filosofico-scientifica nel De Placitis di Galeno’, in Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, ed. Cambiano, G.. Torino: 227–43.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1999) ‘Tradition and truth: forms of philosophical-scientific historiography in Galen’s De placitis ’, in Ancient Histories of Medicine: Essays in Medical Doxography and Historiography in Classical Antiquity, ed. van der Eijk, P.. Leiden: 333–58.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (2013) Galeno: Nuovi scritti autobiografici. Rome.Google Scholar
Viano, C. A. (1981) ‘Lo scetticismo antico e la medicina’, in Giannantoni (1981): 563–656.Google Scholar
Vogt, S. (2008) ‘Drugs and pharmacology’, in Hankinson (2008a): 304–22.Google Scholar
von Müller, I. (1895) ‘Über Galens Werk vom Wissenschaftlichen Beweis’, Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, erste Classe 20: 403–78.Google Scholar
von Müller, I. (1898) ‘Über die dem Galen zugeschriebene Abhandlung Περὶ τῆς ἀρίστης αἱρέσεως’, Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Klasse: 53–162.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (1989) Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (1995) ‘Science as text, science as history: Galen on metaphor’, in van der Eijk, Hortmanshoff, and Schrijvers (1995), vol. 2: 499–517.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (1997) ‘Inefficacy, error and failure: Galen on δόκιμα φάρμακα ἄπρακτα’, in Debru (1997): 59–83.Google Scholar
Wakelnig, E. (2018) ‘Medical knowledge as a proof of the Creator’s wisdom and the Arabic reception of Galen’s On the Usefulness of the Parts’, in Bouras-Vallianatos and Xenophontos (2018): 131–49.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (1932) ‘Galens Schrift Über die medizinische Erfahrung (Vorläufiger Bericht)’, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Phil.-hist. Klasse: 449–68.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (1944) ‘Introduction’, in idem (ed.), Galen on Medical Experience: First edition of the Arabic version with English translation and notes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (1949) ‘New light on Galen’s moral philosophy’, Classical Quarterly 43: 82–96.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. (1980) ‘Philosophy and medicine in Late Antiquity’, in Texts and Studies in Neoplatonism and Byzantine Literature. Collected Papers by L. G. Westerink. Amsterdam: 83–91. Reprint of Janus 51 (1964): 169–77.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. (1987) ‘Platonic philosophy in the early centuries of the Empire’, ANRW 36.1: 81–123.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1994) Vagueness. London.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000) Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wolska-Conus, W. (1992) ‘Les commentaires de Stephanos d’Athènes au Prognostikon et aux Aphorismes d’Hippocrate : de Galien à la pratique scolaire alexandrine’, Revue des études byzantines 50: 5–86.Google Scholar
Woodward, L. H. (2009) Diogenes of Babylon: A Stoic on Music and Ethics. MPhil. diss. University College London.Google Scholar
Wootton, D. (2015) The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution. New York.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, F. (1981) Al-Fārābī’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. Oxford.Google Scholar