Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T11:52:08.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Substantive Contributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2017

Oliver James
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Sebastian R. Jilke
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Gregg G. Van Ryzin
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Experiments in Public Management Research
Challenges and Contributions
, pp. 165 - 436
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Amabile, T. M. 1993. ‘Motivational synergy: toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace’, Human Resource Management Review 3(3): 185201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A. and Tighe, E. M. 1994. ‘The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(5): 950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arieli, S., Grant, A. M. and Sagiv, L. 2014. ‘Convincing yourself to care about others: an intervention for enhancing benevolence values’, Journal of Personality 82(1): 1524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ariely, D., Bracha, A. and Meier, S. 2009. ‘Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially’, The American Economic Review 99: 544–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belle, N. 2013. ‘Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance’, Public Administration Review 73(1): 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belle, N. 2015. ‘Performance-related pay and the crowding out of motivation in the public sector: a randomized field experiment’, Public Administration Review 75(2): 230–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belle, N. and Cantarelli, P. 2015. ‘Monetary incentives, motivation, and job effort in the public sector: an experimental study with Italian government executives’, Review of Public Personnel Administration 35(2): 99123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bénabou, R. and Tirole, J. 2006. ‘Incentives and prosocial behavior’, American Economic Review 96(5): 1652–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G. 2002. ‘Public and private management: what’s the difference?Journal of Management Studies 39: 97122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. and Walker, R. M. 2005. ‘Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brief, A. P. and Aldag, R. J. 1977. ‘The intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: toward conceptual clarity’, Academy of Management Review 2(3): 496500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, R. G. Jr., Levitt, S. D., List, J. and Sadoff, S. 2012. ‘Enhancing the efficacy of teacher incentives through loss aversion: a field experiment’, National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w18237.Google Scholar
Gagné, M. and Deci, E. L. 2005. ‘Self-determination theory and work motivation’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 26(4): 331–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. 2000. ‘Pay enough or don’t pay at all’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 791810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. 2007. ‘Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference’, Academy of Management Review 32(2): 393417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. 2008a. ‘Employees without a cause: the motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service’, International Public Management Journal 11(1): 4866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. 2008b. ‘The significance of task significance: job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions’, Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 108–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. M. 2008c. ‘Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity’, Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1): 4858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, A. M. and Berry, J. W. 2011. ‘The necessity of others is the mother of invention: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity’, Academy of Management Journal 54: 7396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M., Campbell, E. M., Chen, G., Cottone, K., Lapedis, D. and Lee, K. 2007. ‘Impact and the art of motivation maintenance: the effects of contact with beneficiaries on persistence behavior’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103: 5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. and Hofmann, D. A. 2011. ‘Outsourcing inspiration: the performance effects of ideological messages from leaders and beneficiaries’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 116(2): 173–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M. and Shin, J. 2012. ‘Work motivation: directing, energizing, and maintaining effort (and research)’, in Ryan, R. M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mellström, C. and Johannesson, M. 2008. ‘Crowding out in blood donation: was Titmuss right?Journal of the European Economic Association 6(4): 845–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L. 2012. ‘How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals?Public Administration Review 72(4): 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A. and Wise, L. Recascino 2010. ‘Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: twenty years of research and an agenda for the future’, Public Administration Review 79(5): 681–90.Google Scholar
Perry, J. L., Mesch, D. and Paarlberg, L. 2006. ‘Motivating employees in a new governance era: the performance paradigm revisited’, Public Administration Review 66(4): 505–14.Google Scholar
Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A. and Neumann, O. 2016. ‘Public service motivation: a systematic literature review and outlook’, Public Administration Review. Early view. doi: 10.1111/puar.12505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. ‘Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being’, American Psychologist 55(1): 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenabeele, W. 2007. ‘Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: an institutional approach’, Public Management Review 9(4): 545–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, A., Rost, K. and Osterloh, M. 2010. ‘Pay for performance in the public sector. Benefits and (hidden) costs’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(2): 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K. and Pandey, S. K. 2013. ‘Measuring public service motivation: exploring the equivalence of existing global measures’, International Public Management Journal 16(2): 197223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., and Williams, M. 1994. ‘Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26(3), 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D. M. and Edwards, B. C. 2014. ‘Unfulfilled promise: laboratory experiments in public management research, Public Management Review, DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.943272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., and Lalive, R. 2010. ‘On making causal claims: a review and recommendations’, The Leadership Quarterly 21(6), 10861120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonakis, J., d’Adda, G., Weber, R., and Zehnder, C. 2014. ‘Just words? Just speeches? On the economic value of charismatic leadership’. Working paper. Department of Organizational Behavior, University of Lausanne.Google Scholar
Arthur, C. A. and Hardy, L. 2014. ‘Transformational leadership: a quasi-experimental study’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 35(1), 3853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barling, J., Weber, T., and Kelloway, E. K. 1996. ‘Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: a field experiment’, Journal of Applied Psychology 81(6), 827–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellé, N. 2014. ‘Leading to make a difference: a field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24, 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellé, N. 2015. ‘Performance-related pay and the crowding-out of motivation in the public sector: a randomized field experiment’, Public Administration Review 75(2), 230–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J., Morton, R., and Serritzlew, S. 2015. ‘Experiments in public management research’, International Public Management Journal. Posted online 11 March 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bono, J. E. and Judge, T. A. 2003. ‘Self-concordance at work: toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders’, Academy of Management Journal 46, 554–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhury, P. and Khanna, T. 2014. ‘Do leaders matter? Natural experiment and quantitative case study of Indian state owned laboratories’. Harvard Business School Working Paper 14–077. www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/14–077_49ce3a1b-0f07-4bb0-9d8b-70bbaa7590ec.pdf Accessed 24 May 2015.Google Scholar
Chreim, S., Williams, B. E., Janz, L., and Dastmalchian, A. 2010. ‘Change agency in a primary health care context: the case of distributed leadership’, Health Care Management Review 35(2), 187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collignon, B. and Detrain, C. 2010. ‘Distributed leadership and adaptive decision-making in the ant Tetramorium caespitum’, Proceedings: Biological Sciences 277, 1267–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Day, D. V. 2013. ‘Training and developing leaders: theory and research’, in Rumsey, M. G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Leadership (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 7693.Google Scholar
Deluga, R. J. and Souza, J. 1991. ‘The effects on transformational and transactional leadership styles on the influencing behavior of subordinate police officers’, Journal of Occupational Psychology 64, 4955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doh, J. P. 2003. ‘Can leadership be taught? Perspectives from management educators’, Academy of Management Learning and Education 2(1), 5467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B. J., and Shamir, B. 2002. ‘Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: a field experiment’, The Academy of Management Journal 45(4), 735–44.Google Scholar
Favero, N. and Bullock, J. B. 2015. ‘How (not) to solve the problem: an evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1), 285308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. E. and Rao, V. R., 1971. ‘Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgemental data’, Journal of Marketing Research 8, 355–63.Google Scholar
Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. 1978. ‘Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook’, Journal of Consumer Research 5, 103–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, L., Arthur, C. A. et al. 2010. ‘The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, psychological, and training outcomes in elite military recruits’, The Leadership Quarterly 21(1), 2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A. 2008. ‘Distributed leadership: according to the evidence’, Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, R. A., Fuwad, B. A., and Rauf, A. I. 2010. ‘Pre-training motivation and the effectiveness of transformational leadership training: an experiment’, Academy of Strategic Management Journal 9(2), 123–31.Google Scholar
Holten, A. L., Bøllingtoft, A., and Wilms, I. 2015. ‘Leadership in a changing world: developing managers through a teaching and learning programme’, Management Decision 53(5), 1107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, C. B. and Andersen, L. B. 2015. ‘Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance’, Public Administration Review 75(6), 829–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, C. B., Bøllingtoft, A., and Andersen, L. B. 2015. ‘Can leadership training teach leaders to LEAP? Experimenting with leadership training and leadership strategies’. Paper presented at APPAM conference, 12–14 November 2015, Miami, USA.Google Scholar
Kelloway, E. K., Barling, J., and Helleur, J. 2000. ‘Enhancing transformational leadership: the roles of training and feedback’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 21(3), 145–9.Google Scholar
Kelloway, K. E., Barling, J., Kelley, E., Comtois, J., and Gatien, B. 2003. ‘Remote transformational leadership’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 24(3), 163–71.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, S. A. and Locke, E. A. 1996. ‘Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes’, Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 3651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjeldsen, A. M, Jonasson, C., and Oversen, M. S. 2015. ‘Distributed leadership in organizational change processes: a qualitative study in public hospital units’. Paper prepared for the 2015 IRSPM Conference. Panel B102: Contemporary Leadership Issues.Google Scholar
Knippenberg, D. V. and Sitkin, S. B. 2013. ‘A critical assessment of charismatic-transformational leadership research: back to the drawing board?’, The Academy of Management Annals 7(1), 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovjanic, S., Schuh, S. C., and Jonas, K. 2013. ‘Transformational leadership and performance: an experimental investigation of the mediating effects of basic needs satisfaction and work engagement’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 86, 543–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhfeld, W. 2010. Marketing research methods in SAS: Experimental design, choice, conjoint and graphical techniques (Cary, NC: SAS Institute).Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. J. 1966. ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, Journal of Political Economy 74, 132–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, P. E., Cober, R. T., and Miller, T. 2002. ‘The effect of transformational and transactional leadership perceptions on feedback-seeking intentions’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32(8), 1703–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louviere, J. J. and Woodworth, G. 1983. ‘Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data’, Journal of Marketing Research 20, 350–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, D. R. and Turkey, J. W. 1964. ‘Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type fundamental measurement’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvel, J. D. 2015. ‘Unconscious bias in citizens’ evaluations of public sector performance’. Online before print in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, M. and Silvia, C. 2009. ‘Does leadership in networks matter? Examining the effect of leadership behaviors on managers’ perceptions of network effectiveness’, Public Performance and Management Review 33(1), 3462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., and Wright, B. E. 2012. ‘Setting the table: how transformational leadership fosters performance information use’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(1), 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, P. A. and Jacobsen, C. B. 2014. ‘The role of performance information in explaining employee acceptance of leadership’. Paper presented at the Public Administration Review 75th Anniversary International Conference, ‘Next Steps for Public Administration in Theory and Practice: Looking Backward and Moving Forward’. 16–18 November, 2014, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.Google Scholar
Park, S. M. and Rainey, H. G. 2008. ‘Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. federal agencies’, International Public Management Journal 11(1), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, K. W. and Sinha, P. N. 2005. ‘Researching the trainability of transformational organizational leadership’, Human Resource Development International 8(2), 165–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, M. J. and Stritch, J. M. 2015. ‘Effects of internal management on managerial trustworthiness’, Paper presented at the Public Management Research Association (PMRA) Conference, Minneapolis, MN, 11–13 June 2015.Google Scholar
Propper, C. 1990. ‘Contingent valuation of time spent on NHS waiting lists’, The Economic Journal 100(400), 193–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, H. G. 1997. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar
Rosen, S. 1974. ‘Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition’, Journal of Political Economy 82, 3455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silins, H. and Mulford, W. 2002. ‘Leadership and school results’, in Leithwood, K. and Hallinger, P. (eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (Kluwer: Dordrecht), pp. 561612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timperley, H. 2005. ‘Distributed leadership: developing theory from practice’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 37(4), 395420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Train, K. 1998. ‘Recreation demand models with taste differences over people’, Land Economics 74(2), 230–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trottier, T., Van Wart, M., and Wang, X. H. 2008. ‘Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations’, Public Administration Review 68(2), 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wart, M. 2003. ‘Public-sector leadership theory: an assessment’, Public Administration Review 63, 214–28.Google Scholar
Van Wart, M. 2013. ‘Administrative leadership theory: a reassessment after 10 Years’, Public Administration 91(3), 521–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, R. and Masal, D. 2014. ‘Public leadership: a review of the literature and framework for future research’, Public Management Review. Published online 20 March 2014 DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.895031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wofford, J. C., Whittington, J. L., and Goodwin, V. L. 2001. ‘Follower motive patterns as situational moderators for transformational leadership effectiveness’, Journal of Managerial Issues 13, 196211.Google Scholar
Wright, B. E., Moynihan, D. P., and Pandey, S. K. 2012. ‘Pulling the levers: transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence’, Public Administration Review 72, 206–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. E. and Pandey, S. K. 2010. ‘Transformational leadership in the public sector: does structure matter?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(1), 7589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Baldwin, J. N. 1990. ‘Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: their impact on motivation’, The American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borry, E. 2016. ‘A new measure of red tape: introducing the three-item red tape (TIRT) scale’, International Public Management Journal. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1143421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B. 1993. ‘A theory of government “red tape”’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273304.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. 2012. ‘Multidimensional red tape: a theory coda’, International Public Management Journal, 15(3), 245–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozeman, B. and Feeney, M. K. 2011. Rules and Red Tape: A Prism for Public Administration Theory and Research. ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. and Scott, P. 1996. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and formalization: untangling conceptual knots’, The American Review of Public Administration, 26(1), 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretschneider, S. 1990. ‘Management information systems in public and private organizations: an empirical test’, Public Administration Review, 50(5), 536–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, G. A. and Walker, R. M. 2010. ‘Red tape: the bane of public organizations?’ In Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., and Brewer, G. A. (eds.), Public Management and Performance: Research Directions. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–26.Google Scholar
Buchanan, B. 1975. ‘Red-tape and the service ethic: some unexpected differences between public and private managers’, Administration & Society, 6(4), 423–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coursey, D. H. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘Content domain, measurement, and validity of the red tape concept: a second-order confirmatory factor analysis’, The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 342–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, G. and Van Witteloostuijn, A. 2015. ‘Regulatory red tape and private firm performance’, Public Administration, 93(1), 3451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeHart-Davis, L. 2017. Creating effective Rules in Public Sector Organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
DeHart-Davis, L., Chen, J., and Little, T. D. 2013. ‘Written versus unwritten rules: the role of rule formalization in green tape’, International Public Management Journal, 16(3), 331–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeHart-Davis, L. and Pandey, S. K. 2005. ‘Red tape and public employees: does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 133–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, E. S. 2011. ‘Economics vs. psychology experiments: stylization, incentives, and deception’. In Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 5869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. 2011. ‘Experimentation in political science’. In Druckmen, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, M. K. 2012. ‘Organizational red tape: a measurement experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, M. K. and Rainey, H. G., 2010. ‘Personnel flexibility and red tape in public and nonprofit organizations: distinctions due to institutional and political accountability’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 801–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., and Anderfuhren-Biget, S. 2012. ‘Resigned but satisfied: the negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction’, Public Administration, 90(1), 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodsell, C. T. 1983. The Case for Bureaucracy. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Pandey, S. K., and Deat, F. 2015. ‘Defending inflexible rules: an experiment on the effect of counter attitudinal behavior on work-related perceptions of public managers’, Paper presented at the 2015 Public Management Research Association Conference, Minneapolis, MN, June 11–13, 2015.Google Scholar
Hall, R. H. 1996. Organizations: structures, processes, and outcomes, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Heintze, T. and Bretschneider, S. 2000. ‘Information technology and restructuring in public organizations: does adoption of information technology affect organizational structures, communications, and decision making?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 801–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 1991. ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration, 69(1), 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, H. 1977. Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses, and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2012. ‘Objective formalization, perceived formalization and perceived red tape: sorting out concepts’, Public Management Review, 14(8), 11951214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, W. and Feeney, M. K. 2014. ‘Beyond the rules: the effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions’, Public Administration, 92(1), 178–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, W. and Tummers, L. 2014. ‘More than words: experimental evidence on the negative effects of red tape on quality and procedural justice’, Paper presented at the IRSPM Conference, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Kelman, Steven. 2008. ‘The “Kennedy school” of research on innovation in government’, In Borins, S. (ed.), Innovations in Government: Research, Recognition, and Replication. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 2852.Google Scholar
Lambert, E. G., Paoline, E. A. III, and Hogan, N. L. 2006. ‘The impact of centralization and formalization on correctional staff job satisfaction and organizational commitment: an exploratory study’, Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, J. A., Sadoff, S., and Wagner, M. 2011. ‘So you want to run an experiment, now what? Some simple rules of thumb for optimal experimental design’, Experimental Economics, 14(4), 439–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luton, L. S. 2007. ‘Deconstructing public administration empiricism’, Administration and Society, 39(4), 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1995. ‘The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect’, Social Forces, 74(2): 379422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. and Herd, P. 2010. ‘Red tape and democracy: how rules affect citizenship rights’, The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 654–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2006. ‘Creating desirable organizational characteristics: how organizations create a focus on results and managerial authority’, Public Management Review, 8(1), 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation’, Public Administration Review, 67(1), 4053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming Government. Reading, MA: Adison Wesley.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. K. 1995. ‘Managerial perceptions of red tape’, Unpublished PhD dissertation, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. 2012. ‘E-government and small business activity’. In Shareef, M. A. et al. (eds.), Transformational Government through Egov Practice: Socio-economic, Cultural, and Technological Issues. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 369–86.Google Scholar
Pande, S. and Bretschneider, S. 1997. ‘The impact of red tape’s administrative delay on public organizations’ interest in new information technology’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(1), 113–30.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. K., Coursey, D. H., and Moynihan, D. P. 2007. ‘Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: a multimethod study’, Public Performance & Management Review, 30(3), 398425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, S. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., and Kumar, V. 2014. ‘Introduction: markets and public administration’. In Dwivedi, Y. K., Shareef, M. A., Pandey, S. K., and Kumar, V. (eds.), Public Administration Reformation: Market Demand from Public Organizations. Routledge/Taylor and Francis, pp. 16.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. K. and Kingsley, G. A. 2000. ‘Examining red tape in public and private organizations: alternative explanations from a social psychological model’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 779800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, S. K. and Marlowe, J. 2015. ‘Assessing survey-based measurement of personnel red tape with anchoring vignettes’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(3), 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, S. K. and Moynihan, D. P. 2006. ‘Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: testing the moderating role of culture and political support’. In Boyne, G. A., Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J. Jr., and Walker, R. M. (eds.), Public Services Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. K., Pandey, S., Breslin, R., and Broadus, E. 2017. Public Service Motivation Research Program: Key Challenges and Future Prospects. In Raadschelders, J. and Stillman, R. (eds.), Foundations of Public Administration. Irvine, CA: Melvin and Leigh, Chapter 19, pp. 314332.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. K. and Scott, P. G. 2002. ‘Red tape: a review and assessment of concepts and measures’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, S. K. and Welch, E. W. 2005. ‘Beyond stereotypes a multistage model of managerial perceptions of red tape’, Administration & Society, 37(5), 542–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. and Bouckaert, G. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quratulain, S. and Khan, A. K. 2013. ‘Red tape, resigned satisfaction, public service motivation, and negative employee attitudes and behaviors: testing a model of moderated mediation’, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0734371X13511646.Google Scholar
Rainey, H. G., 1979. ‘Perceptions of incentives in business and government: implications for civil service reform’, Public Administration Review, 39(5), pp. 440–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, H. G. and Bozeman, B. 2000. ‘Comparing public and private organizations: empirical research and the power of the a priori’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, H. G., Pandey, S., and Bozeman, B. 1995. ‘Research note: public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape’, Public Administration Review 55(6): 567–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, P. G. and Pandey, S. K. 2000. ‘The influence of red tape on bureaucratic behavior: an experimental simulation’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 615–33.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. S. 1999. ‘Contested memory: notes on Robert K. Merton’s “the Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect”’, The American Sociologist, 30(2), 6277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stazyk, E. C., Pandey, S. K., and Wright, B. E. 2011. ‘Understanding affective organizational commitment: the importance of institutional context’, The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. I. and Thomas, D. S. 1928. The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Knopf.Google Scholar
Thompson, F. J. and Riccucci, N. M. 1998. ‘Reinventing government’, Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), 231–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torenvlied, R. and Akkerman, A. 2012. ‘Effects of managers’ work motivation and networking activity on their reported levels of external red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3): 445–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tummers, L., Weske, W., Bouwman, R., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2016. ‘The impact of red tape on citizen satisfaction: an experimental study’, International Public Management Journal, 19(3), 320–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bekerom, P., Torenvlied, R., and Akkerman, A. 2015. ‘Managing all quarters of the compass? How internally oriented managerial networking moderates the impact of environmental turbulence on organizational performance’, The American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 639–59.Google Scholar
Walker, R. M. and Brewer, G. A. 2008. ‘An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations’, Public Administration Review, 68(6), 1112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, E. and Pandey, S. K. 2007. ‘E-government and bureaucracy: toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Andersen, S. and Moynihan, D. 2016a. ‘How leaders respond to diversity: the moderating role of organizational culture on performance information use’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(3): 448–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S. and Moynihan, D. 2016b. ‘Bureaucratic investments in expertise: evidence from a randomized controlled field trial’, Journal of Politics 78(4): 10321044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askim, J. 2007. ‘How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(3): 453–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askim, J. 2009. ‘The demand side of performance measurement: explaining councillors’ utilization of performance information in policymaking’, International Public Management Journal 12(1): 2447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdeaux, C. 2008. ‘Integrating performance information into legislative budget processes’, Public Performance and Management Review 31(4): 547–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdeaux, C. and Chikoto, G. 2008. ‘Legislative influences on performance management reform’, Public Administration Review 68(2): 253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G., James, O., John, P., and Petrovsky, N. 2009. ‘Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments’, Journal of Politics 71(4): 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, Y. and Rainey, H. 2005. ‘Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 529–57.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. and March, J. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Hoboken, NJ: Willey-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gailmard, S. and Patty, J. 2012. Learning while Governing: Information, Accountability, and Executive Branch Institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
George, B., Deschmidt, S., Nielsen, P., and Bækgaard, M. 2016. ‘Rational planning and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: replication and extension of a survey experiment’, forthcoming in Public Management Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmour, J. and Lewis, D. 2006. ‘Assessing performance budgeting at OMB: the influence of politics, performance, and program size’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(2): 169–86.Google Scholar
Greve, H. 2003. Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, C. 2012. ‘How credible is the evidence, and does it matter? An analysis of the program assessment rating tool’, Public Administration Review 72(1): 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. 2009. ‘Evaluating the expectations, disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with public services’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(1): 107–23.Google Scholar
James, O. 2011. ‘Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 399418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. and Moseley, A. 2014. ‘Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information’, Public Administration 92(2): 493511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. and Talbot, C. 2007. ‘The UK Parliament and performance: challenging or challenged?’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(1): 113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, C. 2012. ‘Developing and validating new concepts and measures of program goal ambiguity in the U.S. federal government’, Administration and Society 44: 675701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, V, Laverty, S. and Peskowitz, Z. 2015. ‘Performance federalism and local democracy: theory and evidence from school tax referenda’, American Journal of Political Science 60(2): 418–35.Google Scholar
Kroll, A. 2013. ‘The other type of performance information: nonroutine feedback, its relevance and use’, Public Administration Review 73(2): 265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, A. 2014. ‘Why performance information use varies among public managers: testing manager-related explanations’, International Public Management Journal 17(2): 174201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, A. 2015a. ‘Drivers of performance information use: systematic literature review and directions for future research’, Public Performance and Management Review 38(3): 459–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, A. 2015b. ‘Explaining the use of performance information by public managers: a planned-behavior approach’, American Review of Public Administration 45(2): 201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavertu, S., Lewis, D., and Moynihan, D. 2013. ‘Administrative reform, ideology, and bureaucratic effort: performance management in the Bush era’, Public Administration Review 73(6): 845–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. and O’Toole, L. 2013. ‘Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: common source bias and spurious relationships’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(2): 429–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. 2013. ‘Advancing the empirical study of performance management: what we learned from the program assessment rating tool’, American Review of Public Administration 43(5): 499517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. 2015. ‘Uncovering the circumstances of performance information use’, Public Performance and Management Review 39(1): 3357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D., Fernandez, S., Kim, S., LeRoux, K., Piotrowski, S., Wright, B. and Yang, K. 2011. ‘Performance regimes amidst governance complexity’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (suppl 1): i141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. and Kroll, A. 2015. ‘Performance management routines that work? An early assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act’, Public Administration Review 76(2): 314–23.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. and Pandey, S. 2010. ‘The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4): 849–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. and Soss, J. 2014. ‘Policy feedback and the politics of administration’, Public Administration Review 74(3): 320–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, P. 2014. ‘Learning from performance feedback: performance information, aspiration levels, and managerial priorities’, Public Administration 92(1): 142–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, P. and Bækgaard, M. 2015. ‘Performance information, blame avoidance, and politicians’ attitudes to spending and reform: evidence from an experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(2): 545–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, P. and Moynihan, D. 2015. ‘How do politicians attribute bureaucratic responsibility for performance? Negativity bias and interest group advocacy.’ Forthcoming in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, B. 2012. Federal Management Reforms in a World of Contradictions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, A. and Meier, K. 2015. ‘Managerial goals in a performance-driven system: theory and empirical tests in higher education’, Public Administration 93(1): 1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salge, T. 2011. ‘A behavioral model of innovative search: evidence from public hospital services’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(1): 181210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Bogt, H. 2004. ‘Politicians in search of performance information? Survey research on Dutch aldermen’s use of performance information’, Financial Accountability and Management 20(3): 221–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, M. and Lodge, C. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. and Hobolt, S. 2011. ‘Is government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility’, The Journal of Politics 73(2): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dooren, W. 2004. ‘Supply and demand of policy indicators: a cross-sectoral comparison’, Public Management Review 6(4): 511–30.Google Scholar
Van Dooren, W. 2008. ‘Nothing new under the sun? Change and continuity in the twentieth-century performance movements’, in Van Dooren, W. and Van de Walle, S. (eds.), Performance Information in the Public Sector – How is it used?, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 1123.Google Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. 2006. ‘Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(4): 599611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Jackson: Basic Books Classics.Google Scholar
Yang, K. and Hsieh, J. Y. 2007. ‘Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement: testing a middle-range model’, Public Administration Review 67(5): 861–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ammons, D. N. and Roenigk, D. J. 2015. ‘Benchmarking and interorganizational learning in local government’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1), 309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askim, J. 2007. ‘How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(3): 453–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askim, J., Johnsen, A., and Christophersen, K. A. 2008. ‘Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2): 297320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bækgaard, M. and Serritzlew, S. 2016. ‘Interpreting performance information: motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 7382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, G. and Hood, C. 2006. ‘What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English healthcare system’, Public Administration 84(3): 517–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., and Petrovsky, N. 2009. ‘Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments’, Journal of Politics 71(4): 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanley, V. A., Rudolph, T. J., and Rahn, W. M. 2000. ‘The origins and consequences of public trust in government: a time series analysis’, Public Opinion Quarterly 64(3): 239–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charbonneau, É. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2015. ‘Benchmarks and citizen judgments of local government performance: findings from a survey experiment’, Public Management Review 17(2): 288304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, K. M. and John, P. 2012. Exits, Voices and Social Investments: Citizens’ Reaction to Public Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, W. N. and Sauder, M. 2007. ‘Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds’, American Journal of Sociology 133(1): 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, A. and Green, D. 1999. ‘Misperceptions about perceptual bias’, Annual Review of Political Science 2(1): 189210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., and Tummers, L. 2017. ‘Behavioral public administration: combining insights from public administration and psychology’, Public Administration Review 77(1): 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and Meijer, A. J. 2014. ‘The effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: evidence from an online experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D., and Yamamoto, T. 2014. ‘Causal inference in conjoint analysis: understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments’, Political Analysis 22(1): 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, K. M., Olsen, A. L., and Bech, M. 2015. ‘Cross-national yardstick comparisons: a choice experiment on a forgotten voter heuristic’, Political Behavior 37(4): 767–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatry, H. P. 1999. Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, S. 1993. Numbered Voices: How Opinion Polling Has Shaped American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., and Alford, J. R. 2014. ‘Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology’, Behavioral and Brain Science 37: 297350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, C. 2006. ‘Transparency in historical perspective’. In Hood, C. and Heald, D. (Eds.), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? 323. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 2010. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hvidmand, U. and Andersen, S. 2015. ‘Perceptions of public and private performance: evidence from a survey experiment’, Public Administration Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. 2011a. ‘Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21: 399418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. 2011b. ‘Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: evidence from observation and experimentation in local government’, Public Administration 89(4): 1419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O., Jilke, S., Petersen, C., and Van de Walle, S. 2016. ‘Citizens’ blame of politicians for public service failure: experimental evidence about blame reduction through delegation and contracting’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 8393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. and John, P. 2007. ‘Public management at the ballot box: performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(4): 567–80.Google Scholar
James, O. and Moseley, A. 2014. ‘Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information’, Public Administration 92(2): 493511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2017a. ‘Incredibly good performance: an experimental study of source and level effects on the credibility of government’, American Review of Public Administration 47(1): 2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2017b. ‘Motivated reasoning about public performance: an experimental study of how citizens judge the Affordable Care Act’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27(1): 197209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, A. 2013. ‘The other type of performance information: non-routine feedback, its relevance and use’, Public Administration Review 73(2): 265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacetera, N., Pope, D. G., and Sydnor, J. R. 2012. ‘Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market’, American Economic Review 102(5): 2206–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. R. 1982. ‘Negativity in political perception’, Political Behavior 4(4): 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. R. 1985. ‘Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior’, American Journal of Political Science 29(1): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, T. J. and Slothuus, R. 2014. ‘Political parties, motivated reasoning, and public opinion formation’, Political Psychology 35(S1): 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I. P. and Gaeth, G. J. 1988. ‘How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product’, Journal of Consumer Research 16: 374–78.Google Scholar
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., and Gaeth, G. J. 1998. ‘All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76(2): 149–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M and Taber, C. S. 2013. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, N. and Margalit, Y. 2010. ‘Short-term communication effects or longstanding dispositions? The public’s response to the financial crisis of 2008’. The Journal of Politics 72(03): 852–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvel, J. D. 2015. ‘Public opinion and public sector performance: Are individuals’ beliefs about performance evidence-based or the product of anti-public sector bias?International Public Management Journal 18(2): 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. 2010. ‘The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20(4): 849–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussweiler, T. 2003. ‘Comparison processes in social judgement: mechanisms and consequences’, Psychological Review, (110)3: 472–89.Google Scholar
Olsen, A. L 2013a. ‘Leftmost-digit-bias in an enumerated public sector? An experiment on citizens’ judgment of performance information’, Judgment and Decision Making 8(3): 365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A. L. 2013b. ‘The politics of digits: evidence of odd taxation’, Public Choice 154 1–2): 5973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A. L. 2015a. ‘Citizen (dis)satisfaction: an equivalence framing study’, Public Administration Review 75(3): 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A. L. 2015b. ‘“Simon said”, we didn’t jump’, Public Administration Review 75(2): 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A. L. 2015c. ‘The numerical psychology of performance information – implications for citizens, managers, and policy makers’, Public Performance & Management Review 39(1): 100–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A. L. 2015d. ‘Negative performance information causes asymmetrical evaluations and elicits strong responsibility attributions’, 111th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, September 2015.Google Scholar
Olsen, A. L. 2017a. ‘Human interest or hard numbers? Experiments on citizens’ selection, exposure, and recall of performance information’, Public Administration Review http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A. L. 2017b. ‘Compared to what? experimental evidence on social and historical reference points in performance evaluation’, Forthcoming in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, B. 1998. ‘Effective use and misuse of performance measurement’, American Journal of Evaluation 19(3): 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Skov, M., Serritzlew, S., and Ramsøy, T. 2012. ‘Motivated reasoning and political parties: evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues’, Political Behavior 35(4): 831–54.Google Scholar
Pope, D. and Simonsohn, U. 2011. ‘Round numbers as goals evidence from baseball, SAT takers, and the lab’, Psychological Science 22(1): 71–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabin, M. 1998. ‘Psychology and economics’, Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 1146.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. and Royzman, E. B. 2001. ‘Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 5(4): 296320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1939. ‘The administrator in search of statistics’, Public Management, 21: 106–9.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1955. ‘A behavioral model of rational choice’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1): 99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, S. N. 2006. ‘Good news and bad news: asymmetric responses to economic information’, Journal of Politics 68(2): 372–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, D. A. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Tummers, L., Olsen, A. L., Jilke, S., and Grimmelikhuijsen, S. 2016. ‘Introduction to the virtual issue on behavioral public administration’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Virtual Issue (3): 13.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. 1991. ‘Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1039–61.Google Scholar
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J. 2015. Performance Management in the Public Sector. London, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. 2011. ‘Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4): 745760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. and Lavena, C. F. 2013. ‘The credibility of government performance reporting’, Public Performance & Management Review, 37(1): 87103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. K. 1986. ‘The politics of blame avoidance’, Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bannister, F. and Connolly, R. 2011. ‘The trouble with transparency: a critical review of openness in e-government’, Policy and Internet 3(1): 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauhr, M. and Grimes, M 2014. ‘Indignation or resignation: the implications of transparency for societal accountability’, Governance 27(2): 291320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. L. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, C. 2009. ‘The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government’, Governance 22(4): 529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cucciniello, M. and Nasi, G. 2014. ‘Transparency for trust in government: how effective is formal transparency?International Journal of Public Administration 37(13): 911–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuillier, D. 2010. ‘Honey v. vinegar: testing compliance-gaining theories in the context of freedom of information laws’, Communication Law and Policy 15(3): 203–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fine Licht, J. 2011. ‘Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy’, Scandinavian Political Studies 34: 183201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fine Licht, J. 2014. ‘Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: an experiment’, Public Administration Review 74(3): 361–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., and Gilljam, M. 2014. ‘When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context‐bound relationship’, Governance, 27(1): 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erkkilä, T. 2012. Government Transparency: Impact and Unintended Consequences. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. 2010. ‘Is transparency the best disinfectant?The Journal of Political Philosophy 18(4): 389404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florini, A. 2007. ‘Introduction: the battle over transparency’, in Florini, A. (ed.), The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World, pp. 116. New York: Colombia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. 2011. ‘Being transparent or spinning the message? An experiment into the effects of varying message content on trust in government’, Information Polity 16(1): 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. 2012. ‘Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: an experiment’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 78(1): 5073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. and Kasymova, J. 2015. ‘Not so universal after all: exploring the meaning and use of government transparency in consensual and majoritarian democracies’, Public Integrity 17(4): 389407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. and Klijn, A. 2015. ‘The effects of judicial transparency on public trust: evidence from a field experiment’, Public Administration 93(4): 9951011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and Meijer, A. J. 2014. ‘The effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: evidence from an online experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., and Im, T. 2013. ‘The effect of transparency on trust in government: a cross‐national comparative experiment’, Public Administration Review 73(4): 575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G. and Welch, E. W. 2012. ‘Developing and testing a theoretical framework for computer-mediated transparency of local governments’, Public Administration Review 78(1): 562–71.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 1991. ‘A public management for all seasons?Public Administration 69(1): 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 2006. ‘Transparency in historical perspective’, in Hood, C. and Heald, D. (eds.), pp. 323.Google Scholar
Hood, C, and Heald, D. (eds.) 2006. Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, J. 2009. The Life and Death of Democracy. Norton: New York.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, C. and Naurin, D. 2010. ‘Transparency is not enough: making transparency effective in reducing corruption’, International Political Science Review 31(3): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, A. J. 2009. ‘Understanding computer-mediated transparency’, International Review of Administrative Sciences 75(2): 255–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, A. J. 2013. ‘Understanding the complex dynamics of transparency’, Public Administration Review 73(3): 429–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, A. ’t Hart, P., and Worthy, B. 2015. ‘Assessing government transparency: an interpretive framework’, Administration and Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715598341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. 2002. A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peisakhin, L. 2012. ‘Transparency and corruption: evidence from India’, Journal of Law and Economics 55(1): 129–49.Google Scholar
Peisakhin, L. and Pinto, P. 2010. ‘Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India’, Regulation and Governance 4(3): 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pina, V., Torres, L., and Royo, S. 2007. ‘Are ICTs improving transparency and accountability in the EU Regional and local governments? An empirical study’, Public Administration 85(2): 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotrowski, S. J. 2008. Governmental Transparency in the Path of Administrative Reform. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Porumbescu, G. 2015a. ‘Comparing the effects of e-government and social media use on trust in government: evidence from Seoul, South Korea’, Public Management Review. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1100751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porumbescu, G. 2015b. ‘Linking transparency to trust in government and voice’, American Review of Public Administration. DOI: 10.1177/0275074015607301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relly, J. E. and Sabharwal, M. 2009. ‘Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: a cross-national study’, Government Information Quarterly 26(1): 148–57.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. 2006. Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S., Green, M. C., and Lerner, J. S. 2000. ‘The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78(5): 853–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolbert, C. J. and Mossberger, K. 2006. ‘The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government’, Public Administration Review 66(3): 354–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., and Moon, M. J. 2005. ‘Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3): 371–91.Google Scholar
Welch, E. W. and Wong, W. 2001. ‘Global information technology pressure and government accountability: the mediating effect of domestic context on website openness’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(4): 509–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirtz, B., Piehler, R., Thomas, M., and Daiser, P. 2015. ‘Resistance of public personnel to open government: a cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data’, Public Management Review. DOI:10.1080/14719037.2015.1103889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthy, B. 2010. ‘More open but not more trusted? The effect of the freedom of information act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government’, Governance 23(4): 561–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zyl, A. 2014. ‘How civil society organizations close the gap between transparency and accountability’, Governance 27(2): 347–56.Google Scholar

References

Aalbert, T. and Todal Jenssen, A. 2007. ‘Gender stereotyping of political candidates: an experimental study of political communication’, Nordicom Review 28(1): 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R., Ashworth, R., and Meier, K. J. 2014. ‘Representative bureaucracy and fire service performance’, International Public Management Journal 17: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, D. N. and Wilkins, V. M. 2013. ‘Going beyond reading, writing, and arithmetic: the effects of teacher representation on teen pregnancy rates’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 771–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M. and Mullainathan, S. 2004. ‘Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination’, American Economic Review 94(4): 9911013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, M., and Kellough, J. E. 2011. ‘Representative bureaucracy: assessing the evidence on active representation’, American Review of Public Administration 41:157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, M. and Struyk, R. J. 1993. Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Gade, D. M. and Wilkins, V. M. 2013. ‘Where did you serve? Veteran identity, representative bureaucracy, and vocational rehabilitation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23: 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D. J. 2004. ‘“Walking the Walk” of public service motivation: public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 6786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, L. R., Wilkins, V. M., Meier, K. J., and Holland, C. 2002. ‘Lipstick and logarithms: gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review 96: 553–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellough, J. E. 1990. ‘Integration in the public workplace: determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies’, Public Administration Review 50: 557–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellough, J. E. and Euel, E. 1992. ‘Demographic and organizational influences on racial/ethnic and gender integration in federal agencies’, Social Science Quarterly 73: 111.Google Scholar
Kingsley, J. D. 1944. Representative Bureaucracy: An Interpretation of the British Civil Service. Yellow Springs, OH: The Antioch Press.Google Scholar
Matland, R. E. 1994. ‘Putting Scandinavian equality to the test: an experimental evaluation of gender stereotyping of political candidates in a sample of Norwegian voters’, British Journal of Political Science 24(2): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. 1975. ‘Representative bureaucracy: an empirical analysis’, American Political Science Review 69(2): 526–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. 1993a. ‘Latinos and representative bureaucracy: testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3: 393414.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J. 1993b. ‘Representative bureaucracy: a theoretical and empirical exposition’, Research in Public Administration 2: 135.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J. and Nicholson-Crotty, J. 2006. ‘Gender, representative bureaucracy and law enforcement: the case of sexual assault’, Public Administration Review 66: 850–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. and Nigro, L. G. 1976. ‘Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences’, Public Administration Review 36: 458–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. and Stewart, J. 1992. ‘The impact of representative bureaucracies: educational systems and public policies’, American Review of Public Administration 22: 157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, R. B. and Williams, K. C. 2008. ‘Experimentation in political science’. In Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–56.Google Scholar
Mosher, F. C. 1968. Democracy and the Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riccucci, N. M. and Meyers, M. 2004. ‘Linking passive and active representation: the case of front-line workers in welfare agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14: 585–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M. and Saidel, J. R. 1997. ‘The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders’, Public Administration Review 57: 423–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Li, H. 2016. ‘Representative bureaucracy and the willingness to coproduce: an experimental study’, Public Administration Review 76(1): 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Lavena, C. F. 2014. ‘Representative bureaucracy in policing: does it increase perceived legitimacy?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24: 537–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selden, S. C. 1997. The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
Sowa, J. E. and Selden, S. C. 2003. ‘Administrative discretion and active representation: an expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy’, Public Administration Review 63: 700–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, N. A. and Haider-Markel, D. P. 2009. ‘Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: interactions between citizens and police’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19: 409–26.Google Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. 2008. ‘Validity of an on-line panel approach to citizen surveys’, Public Performance and Management Review 32(2): 236–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G., Riccucci, N. M., and Li, H. 2015. ‘Representative bureaucracy and public engagement in emergency preparedness: a replication experiment’, Paper presented at the 2015 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM) Research Conference, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, L. 2003. ‘Clientelism and voting behavior: evidence from a field experiment in Benin’, World Politics 55(3): 399422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, V. M. 2007. ‘Exploring the causal story: gender, active representation, and bureaucratic priorities’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17: 7794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, V. M. and Keiser, L. R. 2006. ‘Linking passive and active representation by gender: the case of child support enforcement’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 87102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Alford, J. 2002. ‘Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory’, Administration & Society 34(1): 3256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, J. 2009. Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-production. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, S. C., Nielsen, H. S., and Thomsen, M. K.. 2015. ‘Brugernes reaktion når det offentlige øger serviceniveauet. Resultater fra et lodtrækningsforsøg på skoleområdet’, Politica 47(2): 125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J., Morton, R., and Serritzlew, S.. 2015. ‘Experiments in public management research’, International Public Management Journal 18(2): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovaird, T. 2007. ‘Beyond engagement and participation: user and community coproduction of public services’, Public Administration Review 67(5): 846–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E. and Parrado, S.. 2015. ‘Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services’, Journal of Social Policy 44(1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudney, J. L. 1983. ‘The evaluation of coproduction programs’, Policy Studies Journal 12(2): 376–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. L. 2012. ‘Policy makes mass politics’, Annual Review of Political Science 15: 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J.. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, J., Dercon, S., Habyarimana, J., Krishnan, P., Muralidharan, K., and Sundararaman, V.. 2013. ‘School inputs, household substitution, and test scores’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(2): 2957.Google Scholar
Hjortskov, M., Andersen, S. C., and Jakobsen, M.. 2015. ‘Encouraging political voices of underrepresented citizens through coproduction: evidence from a randomized field trial’. Paper presented at the 2015 PMRA Conference, 11–13 June, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, M. 2013. ‘Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(1): 2754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M. and Andersen, S. C.. 2013. ‘Coproduction and equity in public service delivery’, Public Administration Review 73(5): 704–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M. and Serritzlew, S.. 2016. ‘Effect on knowledge of nudging citizens with information’, International Journal of Public Administration 39(6): 449–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M. and Thomsen, M. K.. 2015. ‘Samproduktion, offentlige tiltag og servicebrugernes motivation til at deltage’, Politica 47(2): 164–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, C. H. 1984. ‘Citizenship and service delivery: the promise of coproduction’, Public Administration Review 44(SI): 178–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1996. ‘Crossing the great divide: coproduction, synergy, and development’, World Development 24(6): 1073–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L. L., Oakerson, R. J., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S. L., Vandivort, M. B., Whitaker, G. P., and Wilson, R. K.. 1981. ‘Consumers as co-producers of public-services – some economic and institutional considerations’, Policy Studies Journal 9(7): 1001–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pestoff, V. 2012. ‘Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: some concepts and evidence’. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4): 1102–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, S. L. 1984. ‘Citizen participation in the coproduction of urban services’, Urban Affairs Review 19(4): 431–46.Google Scholar
Pop-Eleches, C. and Urquiola, M.. 2013. ‘Going to a better school: effects and behavioral responses’, American Economic Review 103(4): 12891324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, D. O. 2012. ‘Co-production and network structures in public education’, in Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., and Verschuere, B. (eds.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production, pp. 145–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosentraub, M. S. and Sharp, E. B.. 1981. ‘Consumers as producers of social services: coproduction and the level of social services’, Southern Review of Public Administration 4(4): 502–39.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. C. 2012. Citizen, Customer, Partner: Engaging the Public in Public Management. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Thomsen, M. K. and Jakobsen, M.. 2015. ‘Influencing citizen coproduction by sending encouragement and advice: a field experiment’, International Public Management Journal 18(2): 286303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vamstad, J. 2012. ‘Co-production and service quality: a new perspective for the Swedish welfare state’, in Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., and Verschuere, B. (eds.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production, pp. 297316. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Eijk, C. J. A. and Steen, T. P. S.. 2014. ‘Why people co-produce: analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services’, Public Management Review 16(3): 358–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. K. 1981. ‘Citizen coproduction as a mode of participation: conjectures and models’, Journal of Urban Affairs 3(4): 3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Andersen, S. C. and Hjortskov, M. (2016). Cognitive biases in performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 647–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., and Petrovsky, N. (2009). Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments. The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charbonneau, E. and Van Ryzin, G. G. (2012). Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City schools. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 5465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favero, N. and Meier, K. J. (2013). Evaluating urban public schools: parents, teachers, and state assessments. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 401–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filtenborg, A. F., Gaardboe, F. and Sigsgaard-Rasmussen, J. Experimental Replication: An experimental test of the expectancy disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Public Management Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Glaser, M. A. and Hildreth, B. W. (1999). Service delivery satisfaction and willingness to pay taxes: citizen recognition of local government performance. Public Productivity & Management Review, 23(1), 4867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. and Porumbescu, G. Revisiting the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model: Confirmation instead of Disconfirmation? Public Management Review (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Hatry, H. P. (2006). How Effective Are Your Community Services? Procedures for Performance Measurement. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, R., Snyder, J. W., and Saultz, A. (2015). Understanding satisfaction with schools: the role of expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 831–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. (2009). Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 107–23.Google Scholar
James, O. (2011a). Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: evidence from observation and experimentation in local government. Public Administration, 89(4), 1419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. (2011b). Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments. Journal of Public Administration Research, 21(3), 399418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. and John, P. (2007). Public management at the ballot box: performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567–80.Google Scholar
James, O. and Moseley, A. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizen’s perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. M. and Swindell, D. (2002). A multiple–indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62, 610–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licari, M. J., McLean, W., and Rice, T. W. (2005). The condition of community streets and parks: a comparison of resident and nonresident evaluations. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 360–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, W. E., Lowery, D., and DeHoog, R. H. (1992). The Politics of Dissatisfaction: Citizens, Services, and Urban Institutions. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Miller, T. I., Miller, M. A., Kobayashi, M. M., and Hayden, S. E. (2009). Citizen Surveys for Local Government: A Comprehensive Guide to Making Them Matter. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.Google Scholar
Morgeson, F. V. (2013). Expectations, disconfirmation, and citizen satisfaction with the US federal government: testing and expanding the model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 289305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgeson, F. V. (2014). Citizen Satisfaction: Improving Government Performance, Efficiency, and Citizen Trust. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: an alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 480–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R. L. (2010). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Olsen, A. L. (2015). Citizen (dis)satisfaction: an experimental equivalence framing study. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovsky, N., Mok, J., and Cázares, F. L. (2016). Citizen expectations and satisfaction in a young democracy: a test of the expectancy-disconfirmation model. Public Administration Review. Early view, DOI: 10.1111/puar.12623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poister, T. H. and Thomas, J. C. (2011). The effect of expectations and expectancy confirmation/disconfirmation on motorists’ satisfaction with state highways. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 601–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roch, C. H. and Poister, T. H. (2006). Citizens, accountability, and service satisfaction the influence of expectations. Urban Affairs Review, 41(3), 292308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stipak, B. (1979). Citizen satisfaction with urban services: potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review, 39(1), 4652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stipak, B. (1980). Using clients to evaluate programs. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 5, 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swindell, D., and Kelly, J. M. (2000). Linking citizen satisfaction data to performance measures: a preliminary evaluation Public Performance & Management Review, 24(1), 3052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2006). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 599611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy-disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G., Immerwahr, S., and Altman, S. (2008). Measuring street cleanliness: a comparison of New York City’s scorecard and results from a citizen survey. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 295303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ryzin, G. G., Muzzio, D., Immerwahr, S., Gulick, L., and Martinez, E. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: an application of the American Customer Satisfaction Index model to New York City. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., and Parasuraman, A. (1993). The nature and determinants of customer expectations of service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Alicke, M. D. 2000. ‘Culpable control and the psychology of blame’. Psychological Bulletin 126(4): 556574. doi: 10.1177/0146167208321594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arceneaux, K. and Stein, R. M.. 2006. ‘Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election’. Journal of Urban Affairs 28(1): 4353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartling, B. and Fischbacher, U.. 2012. ‘Shifting the blame: on delegation and responsibility’. Review of Economic Studies 79(1): 6787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, G. A., James, O., John, P., and Petrovsky, N.. 2009. ‘Democracy and government performance: holding incumbents accountable in English local governments’. Journal of Politics 71(4): 1273–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeHoog, R. H., Lowery, D., and Lyons, W. E., 1990. ‘Citizen satisfaction with local governance: a test of individual, jurisdictional, and city-specific explanations’. Journal of Politics 52(3): 807–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, K. M. and John, P.. 2012. Exits, Voices and Social Investments: Citizens’ Reaction to Public Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. and Ross, I. 1992. ‘Consumer responses to service failures: influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions’. Journal of Business Research 25(2): 149–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. 1980. ‘“Exit, voice, and loyalty”: further reflections and a survey of recent contributions. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly’. Health and Society 430–53.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 2003. ‘The risk game and the blame game’. Government and Opposition 37(1):1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. S. and Lepper, M. R. 2000. ‘When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79(6): p.995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, O. 2011a. ‘Performance measures and democracy: information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21: 399418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. 2011b. ‘Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: evidence from observation and experimentation in local government’. Public Administration 89(4):1419–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O. and John, P.. 2007. ‘Public management at the ballot box: performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17(4): 567–80.Google Scholar
James, O. and Moseley, A.. 2014. ‘Does performance information about public services affect citizen’s perceptions, satisfaction and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information’. Public Administration 92: 493511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, O., Jilke, S., Petersen, C., and Van de Walle, S. 2016. ‘Citizens’ blame of politicians for public service failure: experimental evidence about blame reduction through delegation and contracting’. Public Administration Review 76(1): 8393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilke, S. 2015. ‘Essays on the Microfoundations of Competition and Choice in Public Service Delivery’. PhD dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Jilke, S., Petrovsky, N., Meuleman, B., and James, O.. 2016. ‘Measurement equivalence in replications of experimental findings: when and why it matters and guidance on how and when to determine equivalence’. Public Management Review http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1210906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jilke, S., Van Ryzin, G. G., and Van de Walle, S.. 2016. ‘Responses to decline in marketized public services: an experimental evaluation of choice overload’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26(3): 421–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, R. R. 1982. ‘Negativity in political perception’. Political Behavior 4(4): 353–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, W. E., Lowery, D., and DeHoog, R. H.. 1992. The Politics of Dissatisfaction: Citizens, Services and Urban Institutions. London: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Malhotra, N. and Kuo, A. G.. 2008. ‘Attributing blame: the public’s response to Hurricane Katrina’. The Journal of Politics 70(1): 120–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvel, J. D. and Girth, A. M.. 2016. ‘Citizen attributions of blame in third‐party governance’. Public Administration Review 76(1): 96108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, K. M. 1990. ‘Avoiding blame: an experimental investigation of political excuses and justifications’. British Journal of Political Science 20(1): 119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, K. M. 1991. ‘Managing blame: an experimental test of the effects of political accounts’. American Political Science Review 85(4): 1133–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, M. R. and Nickerson, D. W.. 2011Voter Mobilisation’, in Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kuklinski, J. H., and Lupia, A. eds., Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 228–40.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. B. 2012. ‘“It’s the central government’s fault”: elected regional officials’ use of blame-shifting rhetoric’. Governance 25: 439–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A. L. 2015. ‘Citizen (dis)satisfaction: an experimental equivalence framing study’. Public Administration Review 75: 469–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., and Doherty, K.. 1994. ‘The triangle model of responsibility’. Psychological Review 101(4): 632–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soroka, S. N. 2006. ‘Good news and bad news: asymmetric responses to economic information’. The Journal of Politics 68(2): 372–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulitzeanu-Kenan, R. 2006. ‘If they get it right: an experimental test of the effects of the appointment and reports of UK public inquiries’. Public Administration 84(3): 623–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. and Hobolt, S. B.. 2011. ‘Is the government to blame? an experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility’. The Journal of Politics 73(2): 316–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Slyke, D. and Roch, C. H.. 2004. ‘What do they know, and whom do they hold accountable? Citizens in the government–nonprofit contracting relationship’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(2): 191209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. K. 1986. ‘The politics of blame avoidance’. Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. K. 1987. ‘The politics of blame’. The Brookings Review 5(2): 43–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, P. T. and Weiner, B.. 1981. ‘When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40(4): 650–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Arrow, K. J., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., and Schulman, H.. 1993. ‘Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation’, Federal Register 58: 10 (January 15, 1993), 4601–14.Google Scholar
Bateman, I. J., Carson, R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Lee, M. Jones, Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E., and Pearce, D. W. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Northampton, MA: Edwin Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, R. T., Hanemann, W. M., Kopp, R. J., Krosnick, J. A., Mitchell, R. C., Presser, S., Ruud, P. A., Smith, V. K., Conway, M., and Martin, K. 1998. ‘Referendum design and contingent valuation: the NOAA panels’ no-vote recommendation’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 80(2): 335–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian-Smith, J., Gleick, P. H., Cooley, H., Allen, L., Vandenwarker, A., and Berry, K. A. 2012. A Twenty-First Century US Water Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. E., Ren, C., Reese, C., Waskom, R., Bauder, J., Mesner, N., Paige, G., Reddy, K., Neibauer, M., and Mahler, R. 2007. ‘Linking public attitudes with perceptions of factors impacting water and attending learning activities’, Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education 36: 3644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Competition Commission 2010. Review of Stated Preference and Willingness to Pay Methods. Retrieved from www.competition-commission.org.uk/our_role/analysis/summary_and_report_combined.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2016.Google Scholar
Menegaki, A. N., Hanley, N., and Tsagarakis, K. P. 2007. ‘The social acceptability and valuation of recycled water in Crete: a study of consumers’ and farmers’ attitudes’, Ecological Economics 62(1): 718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center 2016. ‘January 2016 religion and politics survey’, Available at: www.people-press.org/2016/01/22/budget-deficit-slips-as-public-priority/. Accessed 2 February 2016.Google Scholar
Stigka, E. K., Paravantis, J. A., and Mihalakakou, G. K. 2014. ‘Social acceptance of renewable energy sources: a review of contingent valuation applications’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 32 (April): 100–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoutenborough, J. W. and Vedlitz, A. 2014. ‘Public attitudes toward water management and drought in the united states’, Water Resource Management 28: 697714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Anderson, D. M. and Edwards, B. C. 2014. ‘Unfulfilled promise: laboratory experiments in public administration research’, Public Management Review, 17(10): 125.Google Scholar
Baekgaard, M., Baethge, C., Blom-Hansen, J., Dunlop, C., Esteve, M., Jakobsen, M., Kisida, B., Marvelf, J., Moseleyc, A., Serritzlewa, S., Stewarte, P., Thomsena, M. K., and Wolf, P. J. 2015. ‘Conducting experiments in public management research: a practical guide’, International Public Management Journal, 18(2): 323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, J. 1988. ‘Formal models of bureaucracy’, British Journal of Political Science, 18(3): 353–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, R. 1994. ‘Learning a mixed strategy equilibrium in the laboratory’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 25(3): 411–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, J. and Gates, S. 1999. Working, Shirking and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. N. and Rosenthal, R. W. 1990. ‘Testing the minimax hypothesis: a reexamination of O’Neill’s game experiment’, Econometrica, 58(5): 1065–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiappori, P. A., Levitt, S. D., and Groseclose, T. 2002. ‘Testing mixed-strategy equilibria when players are heterogeneous: the case of penalty kicks in soccer’, American Economic Review, 92(4): 1138–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R., DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R., and Ross, T. W. 1996. ‘Cooperation without reputation: experimental evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games’, Games and Economic Behaviour, 12(2): 187218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, V. P. and Sobel, J. 1982. ‘Strategic information transmission’, Econometrica, 50(6): 1431–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, M. P. and Plott, C. R.. 1978. ‘Committee decisions under majority rule: an experimental study’, American Political Science Review, 72(2): 575–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher, U. 2007. ‘Z-Tree: ‘Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments’, Experimental Economics, 10(2): 171–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, S. and Patty, J. W. 2012. ‘Formal models of bureaucracy’, Annual Review of Political Science, 15: 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlbach, S. 2013. Formal Models of Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, J. 1995. ‘Formal models of legislative/administrative interaction: a survey of the subfield’, Public Administration Review, 55(1): 99106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, B. 2015. ‘Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE’, Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1.1: 114–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, M. J. and Munger, M. C. 1997. Analytical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. and McCarty, N. 2004. ‘Bureaucratic capacity, delegation, and political reform’, American Political Science Review, 98(3): 481–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. and Mislin, A. 2011. ‘Trust games: a meta-analysis’, Journal of Economic Psychology, 32: 865–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, L., Murnighan, M., and Keith, J. 1993. ‘Conjecture, uncertainty, and cooperation in prisoner’s dilemma games: some experimental evidence’, Games and Economic Behaviour, 22(1): 91117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margetts, H. Z. 2011. ‘Experiments for public management research’, Public Management Review, 13(2): 189208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, K., Mukherji, A., and Runkle, D. 2000. ‘An experimental study of information and mixed-strategy play in the three-person matching-pennies game’, Economic Theory, 15(2): 421–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, N. and Meirowitz, A. 2007. Political Game Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, M. D. and Schwartz, T. 1984. ‘Congressional oversight over-looked: police patrols versus re alarms’, American Journal of Political Science, 28(1): 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, R. B. 1999. ‘Methods and models’, in A Guide to the Empirical Analysis of Formal Models in Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, J. 1951. ‘Non-cooperative games’, The Annals of Mathematics, 54(2): 286–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, J. 1995. ‘Games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria: an experimental study’, Games and Economic Behaviour, 10(1): 202–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2011. Government at a Glance 2011. Paris: OECD Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, B. 1987. ‘Nonmetric test of the minimax theory of two-person zerosum games’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 84(7): 2106–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Palfrey, T. R. 2006. ‘Laboratory experiments’, in Handbook of Political Economy, Weingast, B. and Wittman, D. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp. 915–36.Google Scholar
Palfrey, T. R. 2009. ‘Laboratory experiments in political economy’, Annual Review of Political Science, 12: 379–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. R. and Smith, V. L. 1978. ‘An experimental examination of two exchange institutions’, Review of Economic Studies, 45(1): 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauhut, H. 2009. ‘Higher punishment, less control?Rationality and Society, 21(3): 359–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shikano, S., Bräuninger, T., and Stoffel, M. 2012. ‘Statistical analysis of experimental data’, in Experimental Political Science: Principles and Practices, Kittel, B., Luhan, W., and Morton, R. (eds.). Palgrave. pp. 163–77.Google Scholar
Shikano, S., Stoffel, M., and Tepe, M. Forthcoming, ‘Information Accuracy in Legislative Oversight: Theoretical Implications and Experimental Evidence’, Rationality and Society.Google Scholar
Smith, V. L. 1982. ‘Microeconomic systems as an experimental science’, The American Economic Review, 72(5): 923–55.Google Scholar
Stoffel, M., Shikano, S., and Tepe, M. 2015. ‘Choosing the right bureaucrat: does screening of bureaucrats pay?’ Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Conference of the European Political Science Association, 2015, Vienna.Google Scholar
Tepe, M. 2016. ‘In public servants we trust? A behavioural experiment on public service motivation and trust among students of public administration, business sciences and law’, Public Management Review, 18(4): 508–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, G. 1990. ‘Penalty has no impact on crime: a game theoretic analysis’, Rationality and Society, 2(3): 255–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Andreoni, J. 1989. ‘Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence’, The Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): 1447–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. 1990. ‘Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving’, The Economic Journal 100 (401): 464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. 2006. ‘Leadership giving in charitable fund-raising’, Journal of Public Economic Theory 8 (1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., and Meier, S. 2009. ‘Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially’, American Economic Review 99 (1): 544–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1976. ‘Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness: economics and sociobiology’, Journal of Economic Literature 14 (3): 817–26.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1978. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bekkers, R. and Wiepking, P. 2011. ‘A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (5): 924–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benabou, R. and Tirole, J. 2006. ‘Incentives and prosocial behavior’, American Economic Review 96 (5): 1652–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernheim, B. D. 1986, ‘On the voluntary and involuntary provision of public goods’, American Economic Review 76(4): 789–93.Google Scholar
Blackwood, A., Roeger, K., and Pettijohn, S. L. 2012. The Nonprofit Sector in Brief: Public Charities, Giving and Volunteering. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Boris, E. T., de Leon, E., Roeger, K. L., and Nikolova, M. 2010. Contracts and Grants between Human Services Nonprofits and Governments. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. www.urban.org/research/publication/contracts-and-grants-between-human-service-nonprofits-and-governments.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. C. 1999. ‘Do public subsidies leverage private philanthropy for the arts? Empirical evidence on symphony orchestras’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (1): 3245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, A. C. 2000a. ‘Is there a dark side to government support for nonprofits?Public Administration Review 60 (3): 211–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, A. C. 2000b. ‘Public subsidies and charitable giving: crowding out, crowding in, or both?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 19 (3): 451–64.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R. B. and Goldstein, N. J. 2004. ‘Social influence: compliance and conformity’, Annual Review of Psychology 55 (1): 591621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamond, A. M. 1999. ‘Does federal funding “crowd in” private funding of science?Contemporary Economic Policy 17 (4): 423–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. and Tyran, J.-R. 2001, ‘Does money illusion matter?American Economic Review 91 (5): 1239–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, J. M. and Graddy, El. 1991. ‘Production costs, transaction costs and local government contractor choice’, Economic Inquiry 29 (3): 541–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederickson, D. G. and Frederickson, H. G. 2006. Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froelich, K. A., Knoepfle, T. W., and Pollak, T. H. 2000, ‘Financial measures in nonprofit organization research: comparing IRS 990 return and audited financial statement data’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29 (2): 232–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, A. and Konrad, K. A 1996. ‘A signaling explanation for charity’, American Economic Review 86 (4): 1019–28.Google Scholar
Gneezy, U. and List, J. A. 2006. ‘Putting behavioral economics to work: testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments’, Econometrica 74 (5): 1365–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneezy, U., Meier, S., and Rey-Biel, P. 2011. ‘When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (4): 191209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønbjerg, K. A. 2002. ‘Evaluating nonprofit databases’, American Behavioral Scientist 45 (11): 1741–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønbjerg, K. A. and Clerkin, R. M. 2005. ‘Examining the landscape of Indiana’s nonprofit sector’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 34 (2): 232–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. H. 2001. ‘Measurement issues in surveys of giving and volunteering and strategies applied in the design of Canada’s national survey of giving, volunteering and participating’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30 (3): 515–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H. B. 1980. ‘The role of nonprofit enterprise’, The Yale Law Journal 89 (5): 835902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H. B. 1987. ‘Economic theories of nonprofit organisations’, in The Non-profit Sector: A Research Handbook, edited by Powell, W. W.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2742.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T. 1998a. ‘The prestige motive for making charitable transfers’, American Economic Review 88 (2): 277–82.Google Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T. 1998b. ‘What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow’, Journal of Public Economics 67 (2): 269–84.Google Scholar
Horne, C. S., Johnson, J. L., and Van Slyke, D. M. 2005. ‘Do charitable donors know enough – and care enough – about government subsidies to affect private giving to nonprofit organisations?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 34 (1): 136–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P., Luksetich, W., and Rooney, P. 2014. ‘Crowding-out and fundraising efforts’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership 24 (4): 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, P., Cotterill, S., Richardson, L., Moseley, A., Stoker, G., Wales, C., Smith, G., Liu, H., and Nomura, H. 2013. Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Experimenting with Ways to Change Civic Behaviour. London, A&C Black.Google Scholar
Karlan, D. and List, J. A. 2007. ‘Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment’, American Economic Review 97 (5): 1774–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlan, D., List, J. A. and Shafir, E. 2011. ‘Small matches and charitable giving: evidence from a natural field experiment’, Journal of Public Economics 95 (5): 344–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, M. and Van Ryzin, G. G. 2014. ‘Impact of government funding on donations to arts organisations: a survey experiment’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 (5): 910–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampkin, L. M. and Boris, E. T.. 2002, ‘Nonprofit organization data’, American Behavioral Scientist 45 (11): 16751715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., Liang, J., Liu, Y., and Xu, H. 2015. ‘What influences charitable giving? An experimental study’, Working Paper.Google Scholar
Light, P. C. 2011. Making Nonprofits Work: A Report on the Tides of Nonprofit Management Reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Mason, D. P. 2013. ‘Putting charity to the test: a case for field experiments on giving time and money in the nonprofit sector’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 42 (1): 193202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, D. P. 2015. ‘Recognition and cross-cultural communications as motivators for charitable giving a field experiment’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 45 (1): 192204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeever, B. S. and Pettijohn, S. L. 2014. The Nonprofit Sector in Brief 2014: Public Charities, Giving and Volunteering. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy.Google Scholar
Monroe, K. R. 1994. ‘A fat lady in a corset: altruism and social theory’, American Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 861–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolova, M. 2014. ‘Government funding of private voluntary organisations: is there a crowding-out effect?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 44 (3): 487509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1998. ‘A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997’, American Political Science Review 92 (1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, A. 1998. ‘Does the government crowd-out private donations? New evidence from a sample of non-profit firms’, Journal of Public Economics 69 (3): 323–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L. 2012. ‘How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals?Public Administration Review 72 (4): 479–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. D. 1984. ‘A positive model of private charity and public transfers’, Journal of Political Economy 92 (1): 136–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R. D. 1987. ‘Financing public goods’, Journal of Political Economy 95 (2): 420–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeger, K. L., Blackwood, A., and Pettijohn, S. L. 2012. The Nonprofit Almanac 2012. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Rondeau, D. and List, J. A. 2008. ‘Matching and challenge gifts to charity: evidence from laboratory and natural field experiments’, Experimental Economics 11 (3): 253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saidel, J. R. and Harlan, S. L. 1998. ‘Contracting and patterns of nonprofit governance’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership 8 (3): 243–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamon, L. M. 1999. America’s Nonprofit Sector: A Primer. New York, Foundation Center.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. 2010. ‘The changing context of nonprofit leadership and management’, in The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management (3rd edition), edited by Renz, D. O. and Associates, 77100. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1955. ‘Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 37 (4): 350–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, J. A. 1990. Charitable Giving and Government Policy: An Economic Analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Shafir, E., Diamond, P., and Tversky, A. 1997. ‘Money illusion’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 341–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shang, J. and Croson, R. 2007. ‘A field experiment in charitable contribution: the impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods’, The Economic Journal 119 (540): 1422–39.Google Scholar
Simmons, W. O. and Emanuele, R. 2004. ‘Does government spending crowd out donations of time and money?Public Finance Review 32 (5): 498511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. R. and Lipsky, M. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, R. 1991. ‘Does government spending crowd out donations?Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 62 (4): 591612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, R. 2006. ‘Economic theories of nonprofit organisations’, in The Non-profit Sector: A Research Handbook, second edition, edited by Powell, W. W. and Steinberg, R., 117–39. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tinkelman, D. and Neely, D. G. 2011. ‘Some econometric issues in studying nonprofit revenue interactions using NCCS data’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (4): 751–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1971. ‘The evolution of reciprocal altruism’, The Quarterly Review of Biology 46 (4): 3557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Slyke, D. M. 2007. ‘Agents or stewards: using theory to understand the government–nonprofit social service contracting relationship’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (2): 157–87.Google Scholar
Warr, P. G. 1982. ‘Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity’, Journal of Public Economics 19 (1): 131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warr, P. G. 1983. ‘The private provision of a public good is independent of the distribution of income’, Economics Letters 13(2–3): 207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, C. R. 1990. ‘Public service configurations and public organisations: public organization design in the post-privatization era’, Public Administration Review 50 (2): 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B. E. and Grant, A. M. 2010, ‘Unanswered questions about public service motivation: designing research to address key issues of emergence and effects’, Public Administration Review 70 (5): 691700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar