Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T07:24:33.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2023

Ewen Bowie
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N., Janse, M. and Swain, S. C. R. (eds.) 2002. Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Text. Oxford.Google Scholar
Agosta, G. 2009. Ricerche sui Cynegetica di Oppiano. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Aitken, E. B. and Maclean, J. K. B. (eds.) 2004. Philostratus’ Heroikos: Religion and Cultural Identity in the Third Century CE. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Alcock, S., Cherry, J. and Elsner, J. (eds.) 2001. Pausanias. Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Alperowitz, M. 1992. Das Wirken und Walten der Götter im griechischen Roman. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Alvares, J. 2001–2. ‘Some political and ideological dimensions of Chariton’s Chaireas and Callirhoe’, CJ 97: 113–44.Google Scholar
Alvares, J. and Renner, T. 2001. ‘A new fragment of the Metiochus and Parthenope romance?’, in Andorlini, I., Bastianini, G., Manfredi, M. and Menci, G. (eds.), Atti del XXII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia. Florence: i 3540.Google Scholar
Amato, E. 1995. Studi su Favorino: le orazioni pseudo-crisostomiche. Salerno.Google Scholar
Amato, E. 2005. Dionisio di Alessandria. Descrizione della terra abitata. Milano.Google Scholar
Ameling, W. W. 1983. Herodes Atticus. 2 vols. Subsidia Epigraphica 11. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1976a. Lucian. Theme and Variation in the Second Sophistic. Mnemosyne Suppl. 41. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. 1976b. ‘Lucian’s classics: some short cuts to culture’, BICS 23: 5968.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1976c. Studies in Lucian’s Comic Fiction. Mnemosyne Suppl. 43. Leiden.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1982. Eros sophistes. Ancient Novelists at Play. Chico, CA.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 1986. Philostratus. London.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. K. 1985. Hunting in the Ancient World. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J. and Nisbet, R. G. M. 1979. ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qasr Ibrîm’, JRS 69: 125–55.Google Scholar
Aneziri, S. 2003. Die Vereine der dionysischen Techniten im Kontext der hellenistischen Gesellschaft: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte, Organisation und Wirkung der hellenistischen Technitenvereine. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Arena, G. and Cassia, M. 2015. Marcello di Side: Gli imperatori adottivi e il potere della medicina. Roma.Google Scholar
Argentieri, L. 2003. Gli epigrammi degli Antipatri. Bari.Google Scholar
Argentieri, L. 2007. ‘Meleager and Philip as epigram collectors’, in Bing, and Bruss, (eds.): 147–64.Google Scholar
Aricò, G. 1972. ‘Diviso vertice flammae’, RFIC 100: 312–22.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1965. ‘Ὥσπερ λαμπάδιον δράματος’, Hermes 93: 253–5.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 1979. ‘The Mound of Brasilas in Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll’, QUCC n.s. 3: 99106.Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. 2002. ‘Some orthographical variants in the papyri of later Greek comedy’, in Willi (ed.): 191217.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2011. ‘Song, politics and cultural memory: Pindar’s Pythian 7 and the Alcmeonid temple of Apollo’, in Athanassaki, and Bowie, (eds.): 235–68.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2013. ‘Rekindling the memory of the alleged treason of the Alcmaeonids at Marathon: from Megacles to Alcibiades’, in Buraselis, Κ and Koulakiotis, E. (eds.), Marathon: The Day After. Athens: 95111.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2018. ‘The cult of peace in the Athenian theatre during the Peloponnesian War: from Euripides’ Cresphontes to Aristophanes’ Peace and beyond’, ICS 43: 124.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. L. (eds.) 2011. Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination. Berlin.Google Scholar
Austin, N. 1994. Helen of Troy and Her Shameless Phantom. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Avaert, P. 1948. Éléments de réalité chez Xénophon d’Ephèse. Thèse pour la licence, Louvain.Google Scholar
Aymard, J. 1951. Essai sur les chasses romaines, des origines à la fin du siècle des Antonins (Cynegetica). Paris.Google Scholar
Bachmann, C. 2018. Bilder einer Ausstellung. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Bady, C. 2021. La Rome des pepaideumenoi: mobilité, patronage et sociabilité des élites intellectuelles hellénophones dans la Rome du Haut-Empire (31 av. J.-C.–235 ap. J.-C.). DPhil thesis, Université Paris Nanterre.Google Scholar
Bär, S. 2009. Quintus Smyrnaeus, Posthomerica 1: die Wiedergeburt des Epos aus dem Geiste der Amazonomachie: mit einem Kommentar zu den Versen 1–219. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Baillet, J. 1920–6. Inscriptions grecques et latines des tombeaux des rois ou Syringes à Thèbes. Cairo.Google Scholar
Bakola, E. 2010. Cratinus and the Art of Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1975. ‘The epigrams of Lucian’, Phoenix 29: 311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1988. ‘Demetrius “Aetolicus”’, Hermes 116: 116–17.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.) 2012. Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, G. 1989. Daphnis and Chloe: The Markets and Metamorphoses of an Unknown Bestseller. London.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1996. ‘Poetry, praise, and patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s “Odes”’, CA 15: 547.Google Scholar
Bardon, H. 1956. La littérature latine inconnue, Vol. ii. Paris.Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. 1966. Favorino di Arelate. Opere. Firenze.Google Scholar
Barker, A. D. 2002. Euterpe: ricerche sulla musica greca e romana, eds. Perusino, F. and Rocconi., E. Pisa.Google Scholar
Barringer, J. M. 1981. The Hunt in Ancient Greece. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Bartley, A. N. 2003. Stories from the Mountains, Stories from the Sea: The Digressions and Similes of Oppian’s Halieutica and the Cynegetica. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bartol, K. 1993. Greek Elegy and Iambus: Studies in Ancient Literary Sources. Poznań.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1989. Decoding the Ancient Novel. Princeton.Google Scholar
Baslez, M.-F. 1992a. ‘La famille de Philopappos de Commagène, un prince entre deux mondes’, DHA 18: 89101.Google Scholar
Baslez, M.-F. 1992b. ‘De l’histoire au roman: la Perse de Chariton’, in Baslez, Hoffmann and Trédé, (eds.): 199212.Google Scholar
Baslez, M.-F., Hoffmann, P. and Trédé, M. (eds.) 1992. Le monde du roman grec. Études de littérature ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. 2010. ‘PSI XIII 1305, Romanzo di Nino’, in Bastianini, and Casanova, : 279–88.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.) 2010. I papiri del romanzo antico. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi, Firenze, 11–12 giugno 2009. Firenze.Google Scholar
Baumann, M. 2011. Bilder Schreiben: Virtuose Ekphrasis in Philostrats “Eikones”. Berlin.Google Scholar
Baumbach, M., Bär, S. and Dümmler, N. (eds.) 2007. Quintus Smyrnaeus: Transforming Homer in Second Sophistic Epic. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bean, G. E. 1965. The Inscriptions of Side. Türk tarıh kurumu yayınlarından 5.20. Ankara.Google Scholar
Bean, G. E. and Mitford, T. B. 1970. Journeys in Rough Cilicia 1964–1968. Denkschriften der Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 102. Ergänzungsbände zu den Tituli Asiae Minoris 3. Wien.Google Scholar
Beaton, R. 1989. The Medieval Greek Romance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Béguin, S. 1971. ‘Quelques nouveaux dessins d’Ambroise Dubois’, Revue de l’art 14: 31–8.Google Scholar
Behr, C. A. 1968. Aelius Aristides and the Sacred Tales. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Behr, C. A. 1981. P. Aelius Aristides. The Complete Works. Volume II. Orations xvii–liii (transl. into English). Leiden.Google Scholar
Bejarano, V. 1975. ‘El emperador Adriano ante la tradición romana’, Pyrenae 11: 8198.Google Scholar
Bekker-Nielsen, T. 2008. Urban Life and Local Politics in Roman Bithynia. Aarhus and Oakville, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélis, A. 1988. ‘A proposito degli “inni delfici” ad Apollo’, in Gentili, B. and Pretagostini, R. (eds.), La musica in Grecia. Bari: 205–18.Google Scholar
Bélis, A. 1992. Les Hymnes à Apollon. Corpus des inscriptions de Delphes. Paris.Google Scholar
Bélis, A. 2001. ‘Esthétique musicale du péan à travers l’exemple des Hymnes delphiques à Apollon’, in Brulé, P. et Vendries, C. (eds.), Chanter les dieux: musique et religion dans l’antiquité grecque et romaine. Actes du colloque des 16, 17 et 18 décembre 1999, Rennes et Lorient). Rennes: 97114.Google Scholar
Beltran Fortes, J. 1992. ‘Arriano de Nicomedia y la Bética, de nuevo’, Habis 23: 171–96.Google Scholar
Benaissa, A. 2018. Dionysius: The Epic Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Benjamin, A. S. 1963. ‘The altars of Hadrian in Athens and Hadrian’s Panhellenic program’, Hesperia 32: 5786.Google Scholar
Benner, A. R. and Fobes, F. H. 1949. The Letters of Alciphron, Aelian and Philostratus. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Bergquist, B. 1990. ‘Sympotic space: a functional aspect of Greek dining-rooms’, in Murray, (ed.): 3865.Google Scholar
Bernand, A. and Bernand, E. 1960. Les inscriptions du Colosse de Memnon. Paris.Google Scholar
Bernays, U. 1905. Studien zu Dionysius Periegetes. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bernhardy, G. 1847. De scriptoribus historiae Augustae: prooemia duo scholis Universitatis Fridericianae indicendis. Halle.Google Scholar
Bernsdorff, H. 2006. ‘Zur Handlung von P.Oxy. 4761 (Antonios Diogenes?)’, GFA 9: 712.Google Scholar
Bernsdorff, H. 2009. ‘Antonios-Diogenes-Interpretationen’, in Studien zur Philologie und zur Musikwissenschaft. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Philologisch-Historische Klasse. Berlin: 152.Google Scholar
Bertazzoli, V. 2009. ‘Il peana di Filodamo Scarfea per Dioniso’, Paideia 64: 437–75.Google Scholar
Bertrand, J.-M. 1988. ‘Les Boukoloi ou le monde à envers’, REA 90: 139–49.Google Scholar
Beschorner, A. 1999. Helden und Heroen, Homer und Caracalla: Übersetzung, Kommentar und Interpretationen zum Heroikos des Flavios Philostratos. Bari.Google Scholar
Bianchi, N. 2016. ‘The number of books of Iamblichus’ Babyloniaca (On Photius Bibl. 94, 78b3)’, Prometheus 42: 219–25.Google Scholar
Bidez, J. 1960. L’Empereur Julien. Œuvres complètes. i 2. Lettres et fragments. 2me éd. Paris.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. 1911. ‘Die Medaillons am Konstantinsbogen’, MDAI(R) 26: 214–37.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. and Lardinois, A. (eds.) 2016. The Newest Sappho. P. Sapph. Obbink and P. GC inv. 105, Frs. 14. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Billault, A. 1989. ‘De l’histoire au roman: Hermocrate de Syracuse’, REG 102: 540–8.Google Scholar
Billault, A. 1996. ‘Characterization in the ancient novel’, in Schmeling, (ed.): 115–29.Google Scholar
Billault, A. (ed.) 2001. ὈΠΩΡΑ: la belle saison de l’hellénisme: études de littérature antique offertes au Recteur Jacques Bompaire. Paris.Google Scholar
Billault, A. 2019. ‘Histoire, mythologie, rhétorique et récit dans le roman de Chariton’, in Chew, , Morgan, and Trzaskoma, (eds.): 5164.Google Scholar
Bing, P. and Bruss, J. (eds.) 2007. Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram. Leiden.Google Scholar
Biraud, M. and Briand, M. (eds.) 2017. Roman grec et poésie. Dialogue des genres et nouveaux enjeux du poétique. CMO 56. Lyon.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. 1994. ‘Hadrian’s farewell to life’, Laverna 5: 176205.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. 1997. Hadrian. The Restless Emperor. London.Google Scholar
Birley, A. R. 2000. Marcus Aurelius: A Biography, revised ed. (1st ed. 1966). London.Google Scholar
Blanchard, J. M. 1975. ‘Daphnis et Chloé: histoire de la mimesis’, QUCC 20: 1962.Google Scholar
Boatwright, M. T. 2000. Hadrian and the Cities of the Roman Empire. Princeton.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. and Sider, D. (eds.) 2001. The New Simonides. Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Bomer, F. 1976. P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar. ii. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bonanno, M. G. 1980. ‘Nomi e suprannomi archilochei’, MH 37: 6588.Google Scholar
Bond, G. W. 1981. Euripides Heracles with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Borg, B. (ed.) 2004. Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Borgeaud, P. 1979. Recherches sur le dieu Pan. Roma (transl. by K. Atlass and J. Redfield as The Cult of Pan in Ancient Greece, Chicago and London 1988).Google Scholar
Borthwick, E. K. 1971. ‘Emendations and interpretations in the Greek Anthology’, CQ 21: 426–36.Google Scholar
Borthwick, E. K. 1972. ‘Nicetes the rhetorician and Vergil’s “plena deo”’, Mnemosyne 25: 408–12.Google Scholar
Bosch, E. 1967. Quellen zur Geschichte der Stadt Ankara im Altertum. Ankara.Google Scholar
Bossi, F. 1990. Studi su Archiloco, 2nd ed. Bari.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1993. ‘Arrian and Rome: the minor works’, ANRW ii 34.1: 226–75.Google Scholar
Boter, G. 2015. ‘The title of Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius of Tyana’, JHS 135: 17.Google Scholar
Bouchon, R., Brillet-Dubois, P. and Le Meur Weissman, N. (eds.) 2012. Hymnes de la Grèce Antique. Approches littéraires et historiques. Actes du colloque international de Lyon, 19–21 juin 2008. Lyon.Google Scholar
Bougot, A. and Lissarrague, F. 1991. Philostrate, La Galerie de Tableaux, traduit par A. Bougot; révisé et annoté par F. Lissarrague; préface de P. Hadot. Paris.Google Scholar
Boulanger, A. 1923. Aelius Aristide et la sophistique dans la province d’Asie au IIe siècle de notre ère. Paris.Google Scholar
Bouquiaux-Simone, O. 1968. Les lectures Homériques de Lucien. Académie royale de Belgique, Classe des lettres. Mémoires, 2nd ser. 59.2. Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Bousquet, J. 1959. ‘Inscriptions de Delphes’, BCH 83: 146–92.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1965. Augustus and the Greek World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1969. Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. (ed.) 1974. Approaches to the Second Sophistic. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1985. ‘Poetry’, in Easterling, P. E. and Knox, B. M. W. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. i. Cambridge: 659–64 (pb. i 4, 1989: 8994).Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. 1994. Fiction as History: Nero to Julian. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1970. ‘Greeks and their past in the second sophistic’, P&P 46: 341 (repr. in M. I. Finley (ed.), Studies in Ancient Society. London: 166–209).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1977. ‘The novels and the real world’, summary of a paper delivered to the International Conference on the Ancient Novel, in Reardon, B. P. (ed.), Erotica Antiqua. Bangor: 91–6.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1978. ‘Apollonius of Tyana: tradition and reality’, in Temporini, H. and Haase, W. (eds.), ANRW ii.16.2. Berlin and New York: 1652–99.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1982. ‘The importance of sophists’, YClS 27: 2959.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1985a. ‘Theocritus’ seventh Idyll, Philetas and Longus’, CQ 35: 6791.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1985b. ‘The Greek novel’, in Easterling, P. E. and Knox, B. M. W. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. i Part 4. Cambridge: 669–99, 703–9 (pb. 1989: 123–39, 243–52).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1986a. ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 1335 (repr. in Rutherford [ed.] 2019: 110–49).Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1988. ‘Who is Dicaeopolis?’, JHS 108: 189–91.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1989a. ‘Greek sophists and Greek poetry in the Second Sophistic’, in ANRW ii 33.1: 209–58.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1989b. ‘Greek poetry in Asia and Achaea’, in Walker, S. and Cameron, A. (eds.), The Greek Renaissance in the Roman empire, Papers from the Tenth British Museum Classical Colloquium (December 1986), BICS Suppl. 55: 198205.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1990b. ‘Greek poetry in the Antonine Age’, in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford: 5390.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1990c. ‘Marginalia Obsceniora: some problems in Aristophanes’ Wasps’, in Craik, E. M. (ed.), Owls to Athens. Essays on Classical Subjects for Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford: 31–8.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1992. ‘Les lecteurs du roman grec’, in Baslez, Hoffmann and Trédé, (eds.): 5561.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1993a. ‘Lies, fiction and slander in early Greek poetry’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter: 137.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1993b. ‘Greek table-talk before Plato’, Rhetorica 11.4: 355–73.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1994a. ‘The readership of Greek novels in the ancient world’, in Tatum, J. (ed.), The Search for the Ancient Novel. Baltimore and London: 435–59.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1994b. ‘Philostratus: writer of fiction’, in Stoneman, R. and Morgan, J. R. (eds.), Greek Fiction. London: 181–99.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1995a. ‘Wine in Old Comedy’, in Murray, and Tecuşan, (eds.): 113–25.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1995b. ‘Names and a gem: aspects of allusion in the Aethiopica of Heliodorus’, in Innes, D. C., Hine, H. M. and Pelling, C. B. R. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric. Classical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford: 269–80.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1996a. ‘Frame and framed in Theocritus poems 6 and 7’, Hellenistica Groningana 2: 91100.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1996b. ‘Aristides (2)’, in The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed. Oxford: 160.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1996c. ‘The ancient readers of the Greek novels’, in Schmeling, (ed.): 87106.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1997c. ‘Hadrian, Favorinus, and Plutarch’, in Mossman, J. (ed.), Plutarch and His Intellectual World. London: 115.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1998a. ‘Le portrait de Socrate dans les Nuées d’Aristophane’, in Trédé, M. and Hoffmann, P. (eds.), Le rire des anciens. Paris: 5366.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 1998b. ‘Phoenician games in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, in Hunter, (ed.): 118.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2000a. ‘The reception of Apollonius Rhodius in imperial Greek literature’, Hellenistica Groningana 4: 110.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2001a. ‘Ancestors of historiography in early Greek elegiac and iambic poetry’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford: 4566.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2001c. ‘Pausanias: inspiration and aspiration’, in Alcock, Cherry and Elsner, (eds.): 2132.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002a. ‘The chronology of the earlier Greek novels since B. E. Perry: revisions and precisions’, AN 2: 4763.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002c. ‘Ionian iambus and Old Attic Comedy’, in Willi, A. (ed.), The Language of Old Comedy. Oxford: 3350.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002d. ‘Plutarch and literary activity in Achaea: AD 107–117’, in Stadter, P. A. and Van der Stockt, L. (eds.), Sage and Emperor. Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 AD). Leuven: 4156.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2002e. ‘Hadrian and Greek poetry’, in Ostenfeld, E., Blomqvist, K. and Nevett, L. C. (eds.), Greek Romans, Roman Greeks. Aarhus: 172–97.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2003b. ‘The function of mythology in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe’, in López Férez, J.-A. (ed.), Mitos en la literatura griega helenística e imperial. Madrid: 361–76.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2004a. ‘Denys d’Alexandrie: un poète grec dans l’empire romain’, REA 106: 177–85.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2004b. ‘Poetry and music in the Life of Plutarch’s Statesman’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works, Vol. 1. Mnemosyne Suppl. 250. Leiden: 115–23.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2004c. ‘The geography of the Second Sophistic: cultural variations’, in Borg, (ed.): 6583.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2005a. ‘Les animaux dans le Daphnis and Chloé de Longus’, in Pouderon, B. (ed.), Lieux, décors et paysages de l’ancien roman des origines à Byzance. Lyon: 7585.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2005b. ‘Metaphor in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe’, in Harrison, S. J., Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel. ANS 4. Groningen: 6886.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2006a. ‘The construction of the classical past in the ancient Greek novels’, in Eklund, S. (ed.), Συγχάρματα: Studies in Honour of Jan Fredrik Kindstrand, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Graeca Upsaliensia 21. Uppsala: 120.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2006b. ‘Le discours direct dans le Daphnis et Chloé de Longus’, in Pouderon, B. and Peigney, J. (eds.), Discours et débats dans l’ancien roman. Lyon: 2739.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2006c. ‘Choral performances’, in Konstan, D. and Saïd, S. (eds.), Greeks on Greekness. Supplement to the Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. Cambridge: 6192.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2006d. ‘Viewing and listening on the novelist’s page’, in Byrne, S. N., Cueva, E. P. and Alvares, J. (eds.), Authors, Authority and Interpreters in the Ancient Novel. Essays in Honor of Gareth L. Schmeling. ANS 5. Groningen: 6082.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007a. ‘Early expatriates: displacement and exile in archaic poetry’, in Gaertner, J.-F. (ed.), Writing Exile. The Discourse of Displacement in Greco-Roman Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden: 2149.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007c. ‘Pulling the other: Longus on tragedy’, in Elsner, J., Foley, H. P., Goldhill, S. and Kraus, C. (eds.), Visualizing the Tragic: Drama Myth and Ritual in Greek Art and Literature. Oxford and New York: 338–52.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007d. ‘Links between Antonius Diogenes and Petronius’, in Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J. and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), The Greek and the Roman Novel: Parallel Readings. ANS 8. Groningen: 121–32.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007e. ‘The ups and downs of Aristophanic travel’, in Hall, E. and Wrigley, A. (eds.), Aristophanes in Performance. Oxford: 3251.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2007f. ‘Socrates in Aristophanes’ Clouds and the Audience of Attic Comedy’, lecture at the European Cultural Centre of Delphi.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2008a. ‘Aristides and early Greek lyric, elegiac and iambic poetry’, in Harris, W. V. and Holmes, B. (eds.), Aelius Aristides between Greece, Rome and the Gods. CSCT 33. Leiden and Boston: 929.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2008c. ‘Plutarch’s habits of citation: aspects of difference’, in Nikolaidis, A. (ed.), The Unity of Plutarch’s Work: ‘Moralia’ Themes in the ‘Lives’, Features of the ‘Lives’ in the ‘Moralia’. Berlin and New York: 143–57.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2008d. ‘Literary milieux’, in Whitmarsh, (ed.): 1738.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009a. ‘Wandering poets, archaic style’, in Hunter, R. L. and Rutherford, I. C. (eds.), Wandering Poets. Cambridge: 105–36.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009b. ‘Vertus de la campagne, vices de la cité dans Daphnis et Chloé de Longus’, in Pouderon, B. and Bost-Pouderon, C. (eds.), Passions, vertus, vices dans l’ancien roman. Lyon: 1322.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009c. ‘The uses of bookishness’, in Paschalis, M., Panyotakis, S. and Schmeling, G. (eds.), Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel. ANS 12. Groningen: 115–26.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009d. ‘Quotation of earlier texts in τὰ ἐς τὸν Τυανέα Ἀπολλώνιον’, in Demoen, K. and Pratt, D. (eds.), Theios Sophistes. Essays on Flavius Philostratus’ ‘Vita Apollonii’. Mnemosyne Suppl. 305. Leiden and Boston: 5773.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2010b. ‘Historical narrative in archaic and early classical Greek elegy’, in Konstan, D. and Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.), Epic and History. Malden, MA and Oxford: 145–66.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2010c. ‘Stobaeus and Early Greek Melic, Elegiac and Iambic Poetry’, in Horster, M. and Reitz, C. (eds.), Condensing Texts – Condensed Texts. Stuttgart: 587617.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2010d. ‘Marathon in fifth-century epigram’, in Buraselis, K. and Meidani, K. (eds.), Marathon: The Ancient Deme and the Battle. Athens: 203–19.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2011b. ‘Men from Mytilene’, in Schmitz, T. and Wiater, N. (eds.), The Struggle for Identity. Greeks and Their Past in the First Century BCE. Stuttgart: 4963.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012a. ‘An early chapter in the history of the Theognidea’, in Riu, X. and Pòrtulas, J. (eds.), Approaches to Archaic Greek Poetry. Orione 5. Messina: 121–48.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012c. ‘Stesichorus and Ibycus: plain tales from the western front’, in Marincola, J., Llewelyn-Jones, L. and Maciver, C. (eds.), Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras: History without Historians. Edinburgh Leventis Studies 6. Edinburgh: 8394.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012d. ‘Epinicians and “patrons”’, in Agocs, P., Carey, C. and Rawles, R. (eds.), Reading the Victory Ode. Cambridge: 8392.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012e. ‘Luxury cruisers? Philip’s epigrammatists between Greece and Rome’, Aevum Antiquum 8: 223–58.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012f. ‘Socrates’ cock and Daphnis’ goats. The rarity of vows in the religious practice of the Greek novels’, Trends in Classics 4.2: 225–73.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012g. ‘Hadrien et Smyrne’, in Hostein, A. and Lalanne, S. (eds.), Les voyages des empereurs dans l’orient romain. Époques Antonine et Sévérienne. Paris: 247–61.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2012h. ‘Hadrien et Éphèse’, in Hostein, A. and Lalanne, S. (eds.), Les voyages des empereurs dans l’orient romain. Époques Antonine et Sévérienne. Paris: 263–96.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2013c. ‘Milesian tales’, in Whitmarsh, T. and Thomson, S. (eds.), The Romance between Greece and the East. Cambridge: 243–57.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2013d. ‘Caging grasshoppers: Longus’ materials for plaiting “reality”’, in Paschalis, , Panyotakis, and Schmeling, (eds.): 179–97.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2013e. ‘Libraries for the Caesars’, in Koenig, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries. Cambridge: 237–60.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2014a. ‘Rediscovering Sacadas’, in Moreno, A. and Thomas, R. (eds.), Patterns of the Past: Epitēdeumata in the Greek Tradition. Oxford: 3955.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2014c. ‘Becoming wolf, staying sheep’, in Rees, R. and Madsen, J. (eds.), Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing. Leiden and Boston: 3978.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2014d. ‘Greek culture in Arrian’s Bithynia’, in Lalanne, S. and Hostein, A. (eds.), Le monde d’Arrien de Nicomédie. Ktèma 39: 3749.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2015a. ‘Stesichorus at Athens’, in Finglass, and Kelly, (eds.): 111–24.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2015b. ‘Aristophanes Clouds: an agonistic note’, in Fernández, C., Nápoli, J. and Zecchin, G. (eds.), ΑΓΩΝ: Competencia y cooperación de la antigua Grecia a la actualidad. Homenaje a Ana María González de Tobia. La Plata: 95109.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2015c. ‘Land without priests? Religious Authority in Longus, Daphnis and Chloe ’, in Panayotakis, Schmeling and Paschalis, : 6784.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2015d. ‘Time and place, narrative and speech in Philicus, Philodamus and Limenius’, in Faulkner, A. and Hodkinson, O. (eds.), Hymnic Narrative and the Narratology of Greek Hymns. Leiden and Boston: 87118.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016a. ‘Cultic contexts for elegiac performance’, in Swift, L. and Carey, C. (eds.), Iambus and Elegy. New Approaches. Oxford: 1532.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016b. ‘Quo usque tandem? How long were sympotic songs?’, in Cazzato, V., Obbink, D. and Prodi, E. E. (eds.), The Cup of Song: Studies on Poetry and the Symposium. Oxford: 2841.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016f. ‘Doing Doric’, in Sistakou, E. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Dialect, Diction, and Style in Greek Literary and Inscribed Epigram. Trends in Classics Supplementary Volume 43. Berlin and New York: 322.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016g. ‘Xenophon’s influence in imperial Greece’, in Flower, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon. Cambridge: 403–14.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016h. ‘Gymnosophists’, in OCD online.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2016i. ‘Literary criticism of archaic lyric, elegiac and iambic poetry in Dio of Prusa’, in E. Amato, C. Bost-Pouderon, T. Grandjean, L. Thévenet, and G. Ventrella (eds.), ‘Dion de Pruse: l’homme, son œuvre et sa postérité’ (Actes du colloque Nantes, 21–23 mai 2015). Spoudasmata 169. Hildesheim 2016, 365–72.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2017a. ‘Poetic elements in the vocabulary of the Greek novelists’, in Biraud, M. and Briand, M. (eds.), Roman grec et poésie. Dialogue des genres et nouveaux enjeux du poétique. CMO 56. Lyon: 97133.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2017c. ‘The view from Aphrodisias and Hadrianoutherae’, in Niehoff, M. R. (ed.), Journeys in the Roman East: Imagined and Real. Tübingen: 2351.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2018a. ‘The Lesson of Book 2’, in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.): 5374.Google Scholar
Bowie, E.L. 2018c. ‘Captured moments: illustrating Longus’ prose’, in Thorsen, T. S. and Harrison, S. J. (eds.), The Dynamics of Ancient Prose. Trends in Classics Supplementary Volume 62. Berlin and New York: 195222.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (ed.) 2018d. Herodotus. Narrator Scientist Historian. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019b. ‘Animals, slaves and masters in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe ’, in Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S. and Panayotakis, C. (eds.), Masters and Slaves. ANS 23: 107–25.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019c. ‘Λέξεις Λόγγου’, in Chew, Morgan and Trzaskoma (eds.): 99114.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019d. ‘Marcus Aurelius, Greek poets, and Greek sophists: friends or foes?’, in Bosman, P. R. (ed.), Intellectual and Empire in Greco-Roman Antiquity. London: 142–59.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019e. ‘The marginalisation of women in Philostratus’ Lives of the sophists ’, in Lalanne, S. (ed.), Femmes grecques de l’Orient romain, DHA Suppl. 18: 207–19.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019f. ‘Poetic and prose oral performance in the Greek world of the Roman Empire’, in Ruiz Montero, C. (ed.), Aspects of Orality and Greek Literature in the Roman Empire. Newcastle: 5081.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019g. Longus: Daphnis and Chloe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019h. ‘The demotion of the literary cowherd’, in Bastick, J., Cusset, C. and Vieilleville, C. (eds.), Aitia 9.1. Le bouvier dans la poésie hellénistique et le roman grec. Lyon: no pagination.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2019i. ‘Callimachus and Longus’, in Klooster, J., Cuyper, M., Regtuit, R. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus Revisited. New Perspectives in Callimachean Scholarship. Hellenistica Groningana 24. Groningen: 5164.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2020b. ‘Silence in Chariton, Xenophon, Achilles Tatius and Longus’, in Papadodima, E. (ed.), Faces of Silence in Ancient Greek Literature. Trends in Classics Supplementary Volume 100. Berlin and Boston: 5172.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2021a. ‘Sappho in imperial Greek literature’, in Finglass, P. and Kelly, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Sappho. Cambridge: 313–29.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2021b. ‘Theocritus and Longus’, in Sistakou, E., Kyriakou, P. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Theocritus. Leiden and Boston: 747–68.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022a. ‘Theatre and autocracy in the Greek world of the High Roman Empire’, in Csapo, E., Green, J. R., Le Guen, B., Paillard, E., Stoop, J. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Theatre and Autocracy in the Ancient World. Berlin and Boston: 163–79.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022b. ‘Singing Rome’, in Delignon, B., Le Meur, N. and Thévenaz, O. (eds.), Performance et mimesis: variations sur la lyrique cultuelle de la Grèce archaïque au Haut Empire romain. Actes du colloque international organisé les 5–7 novembre 2015 par l’ENS de Lyon, HiSoMA (UMR 5189) et l’Université de Lausanne, Supplément de Kernos. Liège: 147–60.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022c. ‘Greek culture in Hellenistic and early imperial Bithynia’, Mnemosyne 75: 73112.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022d. ‘Tradition and authority in Philostratus’ Lives of the sophists’, in Scarlett Kingsley, K., Monti, G. and Rood, T. (eds.), The Authoritative Historian: Tradition and Innovation in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge: 292312.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2022e. ‘Greek Grammatici in the Roman Empire’, in A.-M. Favreau-Linder, S. Lalanne, J.-L. Vix (eds.), Passeurs de culture. Recherches sur les Rhétoriques Religieuses 32. Turnhout: 1732.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. forthcoming. ‘Philicus’ Demeter: not a hymn?’, in Cartlidge, B., Kwapisz, J. and Perale, M. (eds.), Hellenistic Poetry before Callimachus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. and Harrison, S. J. 1993. ‘The romance of the novel’, JRS 83: 159–78.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. and Elsner, J. (eds.) 2009. Philostratus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bowman, A. 1986. Egypt after the Pharaohs. London.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.) 2003. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. R. 1994. Slavery and Society at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bravo, B. 1997. Pannychis e simposio: feste private notturne di donne e uomini nei testi letterari e nel culto. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bréchet, C., Videau, A. and Webb, R. (eds.) 2013. Théories et pratiques de la fiction à l’époque impériale. Paris.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. 1975. ‘The meadow of love and two passages in Euripides’ Hippolytus’, Mnemosyne 28: 268–80.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. 1996. ‘A purposeful manipulation of myth: Philodamus’ paian to Dionysus’, in Aristodemo, D., Maeder, C. and de Rooy, R. (eds.), Studi di Teoria e Storia letteraria, in onore di Pieter de Meijer. Firenze: 8192.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M., van Erp Taalman Kip, A. M. and Slings, S. R. 1987. Some Recently Found Greek Poems. Mnemosyne Suppl. 99. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. and Handley, E. W. (eds.) 1993. Aristophane: Sept exposés suivis de discussions. Entretiens Hardt 38. Vandœuvres–Genève.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. and Furley, W. 2001. Greek Hymns. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1998. ‘The novel and the Apocryphal Acts: place, time and readership’, in Hofmann, H. and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), Groningen Colloquia on the Novel IX. Groningen: 157–80.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2012. ‘Athenian civic priests from classical times to late antiquity: some considerations’, in Horster, M. and Klöckner, A. (eds.), Civic Priests. Cult Personnel in Athens from the Hellenistic Period to Late Antiquity: Berlin and New York: 219–35.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2013. ‘The representation of priests and priestesses in the pagan and Christian Greek novel’, in Dignas, B., Parker, R. and Stroumsa, G. (eds.), Priests and Prophets among Pagans, Jews and Christians. Leuven: 136–61.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. and Roodenburg, H. (eds.) 1991. A Cultural History of Gesture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. 1998. ‘The poets Julia Balbilla and Damo at the Colossus of Memnon’, CW 91: 215–34.Google Scholar
Brioso Sánchez, M. 1989. ‘Caritone III 5 y sus modelos’, Minerva 3: 205–8.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 1994. Dionysius von Alexandria, Das Lied von der Welt. Zweisprachige Ausgabe. Hildesheim, Zürich and New York.Google Scholar
Brommer, F. 1973. Vasenlisten zur griechischen Heldensage, 3rd ed. Marburg.Google Scholar
Brown, C. G. 1983. ‘From rags to riches: Anacreon’s Artemon’, Phoenix 37: 115.Google Scholar
Brown, C. G. 1990. ‘Honouring the goddess: Philicus’ Hymn to Demeter’, Aegyptus 70: 173–89.Google Scholar
Brown, E. L. 1981. ‘The Lycidas of Theocritus’ Idyll 7’, HSPh 86: 59100.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1962. Studien zum corpus Priapeorum. Zetemata 28. Munich.Google Scholar
Buffière, F. 1970. Anthologie grecque: Anthologie palatine, XII, livres XIII–XV. Paris.Google Scholar
Bühler, W. 1978. ‘Ein unbekanntes, Kaiser Hadrian zugeschriebenes Epigramm (Mitteilungen aus griechischen Handschriften, 6)’, ZPE 31: 5560.Google Scholar
Bulloch, A. W. 1985. Callimachus: The Fifth Hymn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bürger, K. 1892a. ‘Zu Xenophon von Ephesus’, Hermes 27: 3667.Google Scholar
Bürger, K. 1892b. ‘Der antike Roman vor Petronius’, Hermes 27: 345458.Google Scholar
Burgess, T. C. 1902. Epideictic Literature. Chicago Studies in Classical Philology. Chicago.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, MA (transl. by E. L. Minar of Weisheit und Wissenschaft. Studien zu Pythagoras, Philolaos und Platon. Nürnberg 1962).Google Scholar
Burnet, J. 1911. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burton, J. B. 2012. ‘From Theocritean to Longan bucolic: Eugenianus’ Drosilla and Charicles’, GRBS 52: 684713.Google Scholar
Byrne, S. 2003. Roman Citizens of Athens. Studia Hellenistica 40. Leuven and Dudley, MA.Google Scholar
Cabanes, P. 1976. L’Épire de la mort de Pyrrhos à la conquête romaine, 272–167 av. J.C. Paris.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1963. ‘Propertius 1.18 and Callimachus’, CR 19: 131–4.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1972. Generic Composition in Greek and Latin Poetry. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1979. Tibullus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2009. ‘Apollo in Delphi and in Delos: poetic performances between paean and dithyramb’, in Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P. and Miller, J. (eds.), Apolline Politics and Poetics. Athens: 169–97.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. III 1970. ‘Aristophanes Vespae 68–69. An unnoticed obscenity’, CPh 65: 257.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. III 1983. ‘Longus 1.2: the she-goat nurse’, CPh 78: 50–1.Google Scholar
Calza, G., Becatti, G., Gismondi, I., De Angelis D’Ossat, G. and Bloch, H. 1953. Scavi di Ostia i. Topografia Generale. Roma.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1980a. ‘The Garland of Philip’, GRBS 21: 4362.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1980b. ‘Two notes on the Anthology’, CPh 75: 140–1.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1980c. ‘Poetae novelli’, HSPh 84: 127–75.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1980d. ‘Crinagoras and the elder Julia. A.P. 6.345 = GP 6’, LCM 5: 129–30.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1982. ‘Strato and Rufinus’, CQ 32: 162–73.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1993. The Greek Anthology from Meleager to Planudes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. 1995. Callimachus and His Critics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Campanile, M. D. 1994. I sacerdoti del koinon d’Asia. Pisa.Google Scholar
Cantarelli, L. 1898. ‘Gli scritti latini di Adriano imperatore’, Studi e documenti di storia e diritto 19: 113–70.Google Scholar
Carden, R. J. D. 1969. ‘P. Schubart 7: a fragment of Euphorion?’, BICS 16: 2937.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 1986. ‘Archilochus and Lycambes’, CQ 36: 60–7.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D. P. C. 2009. Καὶ ὄναρ καὶ ὕπαρ: Dreaming in the Ancient Novel. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Carvounis, K. 2019. A commentary on Quintus of Smyrna, Posthomerica 14. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C. 1977. Aristofane. I Banchettanti. Pisa.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C. 1981. ‘Attico “volgare” e ioni in Atene alla fine del 5 secolo a.c.’, AION (filol.) 3: 7993.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C. 1985. Commedia e partecipazione: La Pace di Aristofane. Napoli.Google Scholar
Casson, L. 1992. ‘The nautical imagery in Anthologia Graeca 10.23’, CQ 42: 555–7.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. 1996. ‘Veicoli materiali della letteratura di consumo: maniere di scrivere e maniere di leggere’, in Pecere, and Stramaglia, (eds.): 1146 (repr. in Cavallo 2005: 213–33).Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. 2005. Il calamo e il papiro: la scrittura greca dall’età ellenistica ai primi secoli di Bisanzio. Firenze.Google Scholar
Chalk, H. H. O. 1960. ‘Eros and the Lesbian pastorals of Longus’, JHS 80: 3251.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. 1980. Fronto and Antonine Rome. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. 2003. ‘Nero, Apollo, and the poets’, Phoenix 57: 276–83.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. 1968–80. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. 4 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Charitonidis, S. 1960. Αἱ Ἐπιγραφαὶ τῆς Λέσβου. Συμπλήρωμα. Αθήνα.Google Scholar
Chaumont, M.-L. 1992. ‘Échos de la campagne de Tibère en Arménie (20 av. J.–C.) dans une épigramme de Krinagoras (Anthologia Palatina IX, 430)’, AC 61: 178–91.Google Scholar
Chew, K., Morgan, J. R. and Trzaskoma, S. (eds.) 2019. Literary Currents and Romantic Forms. Essays in Memory of Bryan Reardon. ANS 26. Groningen.Google Scholar
Christesen, P. 2007. Olympic Victor Lists and Ancient Greek History. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, J. 1984. ‘Dédale géographe: Regard et voyages aériens en Grèce’, LALIES 3: 147–64.Google Scholar
Chuvin, P. 1991. Chronique des derniers païens: la disparition du paganisme dans l’Empire romain, du règne de Constantin à celui de Justinien (2e édition revue et corrigée). Paris.Google Scholar
Cikán, O. and Danek, G. 2018. Longos, Daphnis und Chloë. Vienna and Prague.Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. 1888. Rom und Mytilene. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. 1922. Römische Studien. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Cioffi, R. L. 2013. ‘Seeing Gods: epiphany and narrative in the Greek novels’, AN 11: 142.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. J. 1999. Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. V. 1994. Virgil Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1972. ‘A verse inscription from Eleusis concerning Herodes Atticus’, Ἀρχ. Ἐφημ: 182–3 with pl. 72.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1974. ‘The sacred officials of the Eleusinian mysteries’, Trans. Am. Philosophical Soc. 64.3: 1143.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 1999. ‘Eleusis from Augustus to the Antonines: progress and problems’, in Atti XI Congresso Internazionale di Epigrafia Greca e Latina. Roma: ii 93102.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. 1981. ‘Could Greek women read and write?’, in Foley, H. P. (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: 219–45.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. 1988. Statius: Silvae IV. Oxford.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. 2011. ‘Sailing to Nuceria: evidence for the date of Xenophon of Ephesus’, AClass 54: 2742.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. G. G. 1977. Vergil, Eclogues. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Colonna, A. 1957. ‘Dionysii Periegetae Vita Chisiana’, BollClass 5: 912.Google Scholar
Colonna, A. (ed.) 1987. Eliodoro. Le etiopiche. Torino.Google Scholar
Conca, F. 1969. ‘I papiri di Achille Tazio’, RIL 103: 649–77.Google Scholar
Conca, F., De Carli, E. and Zanetto, G. 1963–97. Lessico dei Romanzieri Greci (Vol. i Milano 1963, Vols. ii–iv Hildesheim, Zürich and New York 1989–97).Google Scholar
Connelly, J. B. 2007. Portrait of a Priestess: Women and Ritual in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 2002. ‘Chariton’s Syracuse and the histories of empire’, in Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Space in the Ancient Novel. ANS 1. Groningen: 1226.Google Scholar
Conti, G. 1970. Decorazione architettonica della Piazza d’oro a Villa Adriana. Roma.Google Scholar
Corrêa, P. da Cunha 2001. ‘The fox and the hedgehog’, Phaos 1: 8192.Google Scholar
Corrêa, P. da Cunha 2010. Um Bestiário Arcaico. Fábulas e imagens de animais na poesía de Arquíloco. Campinas.Google Scholar
Counillon, P. 1981. ‘Un autre acrostiche dans la périégèse de Denys’, REG 94: 514–22.Google Scholar
Cresci, L. R. 1981. ‘Il romanzo di Longo sofista e la tradizione bucolica’, A&R 26: 1–25 (repr. as ‘The novel of Longus the sophist and the pastoral tradition’, in Swain, (ed.) 1999: 210–42).Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 1996. Writing, Teachers, and Students in Graeco-Roman Egypt. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 2001a. ‘The grammarian’s choice: the popularity of Euripides’ Phoenissae in Hellenistic and Roman education’, in Too, (ed.): 241–59.Google Scholar
Cribiore, R. 2001b. Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt. Princeton.Google Scholar
Crismani, D. 1994. Il teatro nel romanzo ellenistico d’amore e di avventure. Alessandria.Google Scholar
Crum, W. E. 1902. Coptic Ostraka from the Collections of the Egypt Exploration Fund, the Cairo Museum and Others. London.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. 2007. ‘The men who built the theatres: Theatropolitai, Theatronai and Arkhitektones’, in Wilson, (ed.): 85105.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 1994. ‘Anth. Pal. 14.34 and Achilles Tatius 2.14’, GRBS 35: 281–6.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 1996. ‘Plutarch’s Ariadne in Chariton’s Chaereas and Callirhoe’, AJPh 117: 473–84.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 1998. ‘Longus and Thucydides: a new interpretation’, GRBS 39: 429–40.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 2000. ‘The date of Chariton’s Chaereas and Callirhoe revisited’, C&M 51: 197208.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. 2004. The Myths of Fiction: Studies in the Canonical Greek Novels. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Cueva, E. P. and Byrne, S. N. (eds.) 2014. A Companion to the Ancient Novel. Oxford and Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Currie, B. and Rutherford, I. C. (eds.) 2019. The Reception of Greek Lyric Poetry in the Ancient World: Transmission, Canonization and Paratext. Studies in Archaic and Classical Greek Song 5, Mnemosyne Suppl. 430. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Curty, O. 1995. Les parentés légendaires entre cités grecques: catalogue raisonné des inscriptions contenant le terme ΣΥΓΓΕΝΕΙΑ et analyse critique. Genève.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. 2006. ‘Discours divins et débats intérieurs dans les Pastorales de Longus’, in Pouderon, B. and Peigney, J. (eds.), Discours et débats dans l’ancien roman. CMO 36. Lyon: 231–48.Google Scholar
Danek, G. and Wallisch, R. 1993. ‘Notizen zu Longus Daphnis und Chloe’, WS 106: 4560.Google Scholar
Davies, J. K. 1967. ‘Demosthenes on liturgies: a note’, JHS 87: 3340.Google Scholar
Davies, M. and Pomeroy, S. B. 2012. ‘Marcellus of Side’s epitaph on Regilla (IG XIV 1389): an historical and literary commentary’, Prometheus 38: 334.Google Scholar
Dawson, S. 1997. ‘The theatrical audience in fifth-century Athens: numbers and status’, Prudentia 29: 114.Google Scholar
De Bakker, M. 2021. ‘Herodotus’, in de Bakker, M. and de Jong, I. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5. Mnemosyne Suppl. 448. Leiden and Boston: 197222.Google Scholar
Degani, E. 1993. ‘Aristofane e la tradizione dell’ invettiva personale in Grecia’, in Bremer, and Handley, (eds.): 136.Google Scholar
Del Corso, L. 2006. ‘Lo “stile severo” nei P.Oxy. Una lista’, Aegyptus 86: 81106.Google Scholar
Del Corso, L. 2010. ‘Il romanzo greco a Ossirinco e i suoi lettori. Osservazioni paleografiche, bibliogiche, storio-culturali’, in Bastianini, and Casanova, (eds.): 247–77.Google Scholar
de Lannoy, L. 1977. Flavii Philostrati Heroicus. Leipzig.Google Scholar
de Romilly, J. 1985. A Short History of Greek Literature. Chicago and London.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2014. Crafting Characters: Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2021a. ‘Chariton’, in de Bakker, M. and de Jong, I. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5. Mnemosyne Suppl. 448. Leiden and Boston: 635–53.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. 2021b. ‘Achilles Tatius’, in de Bakker, M. and de Jong, I. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5. Mnemosyne Suppl. 448. Leiden and Boston: 673–91.Google Scholar
de Vries, G. 1970. ‘Notes on Greek epigrams’, Mnemosyne iv 23: 2232.Google Scholar
Demoen, K. 1988. ‘The date of the Cyzicene epigrams. An analysis of the vocabulary and metrical technique of AP, III’, AC 57: 231–48.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. 1996. Greek Forms of Address: From Herodotus to Lucian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W. 1991. ‘Heliodorus and Plutarch on the evil eye’, CPh 86: 1729.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W. 1998. ‘Poets as Initiates in the Mysteries. Euphorion, Philicus and Posidippus’, Antike und Abendland 44: 4977.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. 1978. ‘Zur Datierung des Metiochos-Romans’, WJA 4: 4755.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. 1989. Der griechische und lateinische Literatur der Kaiserzeit. München.Google Scholar
Dillery, J. 2018. ‘Making logoi ’, in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.): 1752.Google Scholar
Di Maria, G. 1996. Achillis quae feruntur Astronomica et in Aratum Opuscula: De Universo; De Arati Vita; De Phaenomenorum Interpretatione. Palermo.Google Scholar
Di Marzio, M. 2019. ‘L’Epigramma 31 Bernand di Giulia Balbilla e l’acrostico con la voce di Phamenoth/Memnone’, QUCC 123: 105–30.Google Scholar
Di Virgilio, R. 1991. Longo Sofista. Dafni e Cloe. Milano.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. 1994. ‘Archaic Greek foundation poetry: questions of genre and occasion’, JHS 114: 3546.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1964. ‘The poetry of Archilochos’, in Archiloque. Entretiens Hardt 10. Vandœuvres-Genève: 181222 (repr. in Dover 1988: 97–121).Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1968. Aristophanes Clouds. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1971. Theocritus. Select Poems. Basingstoke and London.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1972. Aristophanic Comedy. London.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1976. ‘The freedom of the intellectual in Greek society’, Talanta 7: 2474 (repr. in Dover 1988: 135–58).Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1978. Greek Homosexuality. London.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1988. The Greeks and Their Legacy. Collected Papers II: Prose Literature, History, Society, Transmission, Influence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1993a. Aristophanes Frogs. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1993b. ‘The chorus of initiates in Aristophanes’ Frogs ’, in Bremer, and Handley, (eds.): 173–93.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J., West, M. L., Griffin, J. and Bowie, E. L. 1980. Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1996. ‘Heliodoros: serious intentions’, CQ 46: 267–85.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2006. ‘Pouvoir divin, discours humain chez Héliodore’, in Pouderon, B. and Peigney, J. (eds.), Discours et débats dans l’ancien roman. CMO 36. Lyon: 249–61.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2007. ‘A lengthy sentence: judging the prolixity of the Greek novels’, in Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J. and Zimmerman, M. (eds.), The Greek and Roman Novel. Parallel Readings. ANS 8. Groningen: 133–50.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2010. ‘The gods in the Greek novel’, in Bremmer, J., Erskine, A. and Auffarth, C. (eds.), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations. Edinburgh: 362–74.Google Scholar
Downie, J. 2013. At the Limits of Art: A Literary Study of Aelius Aristides’ Hieroi logoi. Oxford.Google Scholar
Downie, J. 2017. ‘The geography of empire in Dionysius’ Periegesis: a view from the Aegean’, CW 110: 163–86.Google Scholar
Drago, A. and Hodkinson, O. 2023. Ancient Love Letters: Form, Themes, Approaches. Berlin.Google Scholar
Drews, R. 1970. ‘Herodotus’ other logoi’, AJP 91: 181–91.Google Scholar
Dubel, S. 1990. ‘La description d’objets d’art dans les Éthiopiques’, Pallas 36: 101–15.Google Scholar
Dueck, D. 2000. Strabo of Amasia: A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome. London.Google Scholar
Dueck, D., Lindsay, H. and Pothecary, S. (eds.) 2006. Strabo’s Cultural Geography. The Making of a Kolossourgia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Duff, T. 1999. Plutarch’s Lives. Exploring Virtue and Vice. Oxford.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, R. 1977. ‘Age-rounding, illiteracy, and social differentiation in the Roman Empire’, Chiron 7: 333–53.Google Scholar
DuQuesnay, I. M. LeM. 1981. ‘Vergil’s First Eclogue’, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 3. Liverpool: 29182.Google Scholar
Dümmler, N. N. 2012. ‘Musaeus, Hero and Leander: between epic and novel’, in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and Its Reception. Leiden: 411–46.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 1986. Michael Psellus. The Essays on Euripides and George of Pisidia and on Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius. Byz. Vindobon. 16. Wien.Google Scholar
Dzielska, M. 1986. Apollonius of Tyana in Legend and History. Roma.Google Scholar
Eck, W. 1983. ‘Jahres- und Provinzialfasten der senatorischen Statthalter von 69/70 bis 138–139. 2 Teil’, Chiron 13: 147237.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 1985. ‘Aristophanes’ Socrates’, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. Volume I. Lanham: 209–30.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 1991. ‘Damis the Epicurean’, CQ 41: 563–6.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. 1997. ‘The art of love and love of art in Longus’, AC 66: 239–48.Google Scholar
Effe, B. 1977. Dichtung und Lehre. Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. Zetemata 69. München.Google Scholar
Effe, B. 1982. ‘Longos. Zur Funktionsgeschichte der Bukolik in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, Hermes 110: 6584 (repr. as ‘Longus: towards a history of bucolic and its function in the Roman Empire’, in Swain (ed.) 1999: 189209).Google Scholar
Egger, B. 1988. ‘Zu den Frauenrollen im griechischen Roman: Die Frau als Heldin and Leserin’, GCN 1: 3366.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2000. ‘From the culture of spolia to the cult of relics: the Arch of Constantine and the genesis of late antique forms’, PBSR 68: 149–84.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Squire, M. forthcoming. The Art of Looking in the Roman World: Painting and Description in the Imagines of the Elder Philostratus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. J. 1995. ‘Longus’ werewolves’, CPh 90: 5873.Google Scholar
Erim, K. 1986. Aphrodisias: City of Venus–Aphrodite. New York.Google Scholar
Étienne, R. and Piérart, M. 1975. ‘Un décret du Koinon des Hellènes à Platées en l’honneur de Glaucon, fils d’Étéoclès d’Athènes’, BCH 99: 5175.Google Scholar
Fajen, F. 1999, Oppianus Halieutica. Einführung, Text, Übersetzung in deutscher Sprache, Auführliche Kataloge der Meeresfauna. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. 2007. ‘Mescolare il ludicro al serio: la poetica del Corcirese Filico e l’edonismo dei Feaci (SH 980)’, in Lozza, G. and Tempesta, S. M. (eds.), L’epigramma Greco: problemi e prospettive: atti del Congresso della Consulta Universitaria del Greco, Milano, 21 ottobre 2005. Milano: 5368.Google Scholar
Faraone, C. A. 2008. The Stanzaic Architecture of Early Greek Elegy. New York.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. 1971. Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot: Studien zur Erzählkunst Herodots. Berlin and New York (transl. by J. G. Howie as Herodotus and His ‘Sources’: Citation, Invention, and Narrative Art. Leeds 1989).Google Scholar
Fein, S. 1994. Die Beziehungen der Kaiser Trajan und Hadrian zu den Litterati. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Fellmann, B. 1972. Die antiken Darstellungen des Polyphemabenteuers. München.Google Scholar
Fernandez, C. and Zecchin de Fasano, G. (eds.) 2015. Agon. Studies in Honor of Ana-María González de Tobia. La Plata.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Garrido, R. 2021. ‘Ninus and Metiochus in the school of rhetoric: the first Greek novels’, AN 18: 5775.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. 2014. Les mémoriaux de délégations du sanctuaire oraculaire de Claros, d’après la documentation conservée dans le Fonds Louis Robert. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Feuillâtre, E. 1966. Études sur les Éthiopiques d’Héliodore. Paris.Google Scholar
Finglass, P. J. and Kelly, A. (eds.) 2015. Stesichorus in Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. 1982. ‘Greek translations of Latin literature in the fourth century AD’, YClS 27: 173215.Google Scholar
Flacelière, R. 1951. ‘Le poète stoïcien Sarapion d’Athènes, ami de Plutarque’, REG 64: 323–7.Google Scholar
Flinterman, J.-J. 1993. Politiek, Paideia & Pythagorisme. Groningen.Google Scholar
Flinterman, J.-J. 1995. Power, Paideia and Pythagoreanism: Greek Identity, Conceptions of the Relationship between Philosophers and Monarchs and Political Ideas in Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. 2007. Stratone di Sardi; introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento; foreword di Kathryn Gutzwiller. Alessandria.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. 2014. Lucillio, Epigrammi: Introduzione, Testo Critico, Traduzione e Commento. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Foerster, R. and Richtsteig, E. 1929. Choricius. Leipzig (repr. Stuttgart 1972).Google Scholar
Foley, H. P. 1988. ‘Tragedy and politics in Aristophanes’ Acharnians’, JHS 108: 3347.Google Scholar
Follet, S. 1968. ‘Hadrien en Égypte et en Judée’, RPh 42: 5377.Google Scholar
Follet, S. 1976. Athènes au iie et au iiie siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Follet, S. 1977. ‘La datation de l’archonte Dionysios (IG ii23968)’, REG 90: 4754.Google Scholar
Follet, S. 2001. ‘Un ami de Plutarch: l’orateur Athénien Glaukias’, in Billault, (ed.): 8596.Google Scholar
Fornara, C. 1971. Herodotus: An Interpretation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. 1996. ‘Herodotus and his contemporaries’, JHS 116: 6287.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1950. Aeschylus Agamemnon. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. 1962. Beobachtungen zu Aristophanes. Roma.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. 1959. ‘An agonistic dedication from Roman Egypt’, JEA 45: 7980.Google Scholar
Frija, G. 2010a. Les prêtres des empereurs: le culte impérial civique dans la province romaine d’Asie. Rennes.Google Scholar
Frija, G. 2010b. Prosopographie des prêtres du culte impérial dans les cités de la province romaine d’Asie. www.pretres-civiques.org/.Google Scholar
Frijhoff, W. 1991. ‘The kiss, sacred and profane’, in Bremmer, and Rodenburg, : 210–36.Google Scholar
Frost, F. J. 1968. ‘Scyllias: diving in antiquity’, G&R 15: 180–5.Google Scholar
Fuchs, H. 1938. Der geistige Widerstand gegen Rom in der antiken Welt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D. 2009. ‘Philikos’ Hymn to Demeter’, Paideia 64: 483507.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D. and Bremer, J. M. 2001. Greek Hymns. Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period. 2 vols. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 1990a. ‘Il Testo nel testo: la citazione nel romanzo Greco’, MD 25: 2748.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. 1990b. Antonio Diogene. Le Incredibili Avventure al di là di Tule. Palermo.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1991. Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Gärtner, H. 1967. ‘Xenophon von Ephesos’, RE IX A 2, 2055–89.Google Scholar
Gärtner, T. 2006. ‘Zu den erotischen Epigrammen des Rufinus’, Eos 93: 251–65.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. and Höschele, R. 2009. ‘Works and nights: Marcus Argentarius (A.P. 9.161)’, Cambridge Classical Journal 55: 5970.Google Scholar
Galli, M. 2002. Die Lebenswelt eines Sophisten: Untersuchungen zu den Bauten und Stiftungen des Herodes Atticus. Mainz.Google Scholar
Gallavotti, C. 1931. ‘Inno a Demetra di Filico’, SIFC 9: 3760.Google Scholar
Gallavotti, C. 1951. ‘Philico, inno a Demetra’, PSI 1282: 140–9.Google Scholar
Gamberale, L. 1993. ‘L’epigramma dell’imperatore Adriano all’Eros di Tespie’, in Pretagostini, (ed.): iii 1089–1110.Google Scholar
Garnaud, J.-P. 1991. Achille Tatius d’Alexandrie, Le roman de Leucippé et Clitophon. Paris.Google Scholar
Garnett, J. 1895. ‘On the date of the Ἀποτελεσματικά of Manetho’, Journal of Philology 23: 238–40.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. 1955–7. ‘Paraphrasis Dionysii poematis De aucupio’, Byzantion 25–7: 195240.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. 1957. ‘Sull’autore e il titolo del perduto poema Sull’aucupio attribuito ad Oppiano’, GFI 10: 156–60.Google Scholar
Garzya, A. 1963. Dionysii ixeuticon seu de aucupio. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Geagan, D. J. 1964. ‘A new Herodes epigram from Marathon’, MDAI(A) 79: 149–56.Google Scholar
Geagan, D. J. 1967. The Athenian Constitution after Sulla. Hesperia Suppl. 12. Princeton.Google Scholar
Geagan, D. J. 1991. ‘The Sarapion monument and the quest for status in Roman Athens’, ZPE 85: 145–65.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. 2021. ‘Varro and Pompey: some more (multiple) hebdomads?’, CQ 71: 16.Google Scholar
Geissen, A. 2005. ‘The nome coins of Roman Egypt’, in Howgego, Heuchert and Burnett, (eds.): 167–70.Google Scholar
Georgiadou, A. and Larmour, D. H. J. 1998. Lucian’s Science Fiction Novel, True Histories: Interpretation and Commentary. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Gera, D. L. 1993. Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Style, Genre and Literary Technique. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. 1999a. Greek Elegiac Poetry. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1968. ‘Théocrite, Simichidas et les Thalysies’, AC 37: 491533.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1975. ‘Fifteen Hellenistic epigrams’, JHS 95: 3144.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. 1990. ‘Ein Epigramm des Bianor Gow-Page, Garl. Phil., 1731 ff.’, AC 59: 179–80.Google Scholar
Giannini, A. 1965. Paradoxographorum Graecorum reliquiae. Milano.Google Scholar
Giannuzzi, M. E. 2007. Stratone di Sardi. Epigrammi. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Lecce.Google Scholar
Gill, C. 1989. ‘Longus’, in Reardon, (ed.): 285348.Google Scholar
Giuseppetti, M. 2011. ‘Miti e culti tra Attica e Argolide nell’ Ecale di Callimaco’, in Mortira, A., Cozzoli, A.-T. and Giuseppetti, M. (eds.), Callimachea II. Atti della seconda giornata di studi su Callimaco. Roma: 129–56.Google Scholar
Giuseppetti, M. 2012. ‘Two poets for a goddess: Callimachus’ and Philicus’ hymns to Demeter’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Gods and Religion in Hellenistic Poetry. Hellenistica Groningana 16. Leuven, Paris and Walpole, MA: 103–29.Google Scholar
Gkourogiannis, T. K. 1999. Pindaric Quotations in Aelius Aristides. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. 2010. ‘Making space for bicultural identity: Herodes Atticus commemorates Regilla’, in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), Local Knowledge and Microidentities in the Imperial Greek World. Cambridge: 125–62.Google Scholar
Goette, H. R. 2007. ‘The men who built the theatres: an archaeological appendix’, in Wilson, (ed.): 116–21.Google Scholar
Goggin, M. G. 1951. ‘Rhythm in the prose of Favorinus’, YClS 12: 149201.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (ed.) 1982. Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome. Austin.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1995. Foucault’s Virginity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2009. ‘Constructing identity in Philostratus’ Love Letters ’, in Bowie, and Elsner, (eds.): 287308.Google Scholar
Gómez Cárdo, P. 2008. ‘A propósito de algunos epigramas atribuidos a Luciano’, Synthesis 15: 3757.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1927. ‘The Athenian hoplite force in 431 BC’, CQ 2: 142–50.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1933. The Population of Athens in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BC. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1956. A Historical Commentary on Thucydides ii. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gomme, A. W. 1959. ‘The population of Athens again’, JHS 79: 61–8.Google Scholar
Gonis, N. 1997. ‘4418. Apollonius Rhodius Argonautica I 623-33’, in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 64. London.Google Scholar
González Ponce, F. J. 1993. ‘El periplo griego antiguo’, Habis 24: 6976.Google Scholar
González Rincón, M. 1996. Estratón de Sardes. Epigramas. Introducción, edición revisada, traducción y comentario. Sevilla.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. L. 2020. ‘(Re-)modelling religious experience’, in Gasparini, V., Patzelt, M., Raja, R., Rieger, A.-K., Rüpke, J. and Rubens Urciuoli, E., Lived Religion in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Berlin: 2348.Google Scholar
Gosetti-Murrayjohn, A. 2006. ‘Sappho as the tenth Muse in Hellenistic epigram’, Arethusa 39: 2145.Google Scholar
Gould, J. 1980. ‘Law, custom and myth: aspects of the social position of women in classical Athens’, JHS 100: 4359.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. 1952. Theocritus. 2 vols, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1980. ‘Milch, Honig und Wein. Zum Verständnis der Libation im griechischen Ritual’, in Perennitas. Studi in onore di Angelo Brelich. Rome: 209–21.Google Scholar
Green, P. 1982. ‘Longus, Antiphon and the topography of Lesbos’, JHS 102: 210–14.Google Scholar
Greifenhagen, A. 1975. ‘Philopotes’, Gymnasium 82: 2632.Google Scholar
Gren, E. 1941. Kleinasien und Ostbalkan in der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung der römischen Kaiserzeit. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. and Hunt, A. S. 1899. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. and Hunt, A. S. 1908. The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. Vol. 6. London.Google Scholar
Greenwood, E. 2018. ‘Surveying greatness and magnitude in Herodotus’, in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.): 163–86.Google Scholar
Greensmith, E. 2020. The Resurrection of Homer in Imperial Greek Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2007. ‘Diomedes Redivivus. A new reading of Mimnermus fr. 14 W2’, Mnemosyne 60: 102–11.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2010. The Greeks and their Past. Poetry, Oratory, and History in the Fifth-Century BCE. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. G. 1988. Festinat Senex. Essays in Greek and Latin Literature and Archaeology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. H. 1970. ‘Six passages in Callimachus and the Anthology’, BICS 17: 3243.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. 1969. Les jardins romains, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Grintser, N. P. 2018. ‘Herodotus as a literary critic’, in Bowie, (ed.): 157–73.Google Scholar
Groag, E. 1902. ‘Cn. Claudius Severus und der Sophist Hadrian’, WS 24: 261–4.Google Scholar
Gronewald, M. 1977. ‘Ein neues Fragment aus dem Metiochos-Parthenope Roman (Ostracon Bodl. 2175 = P2 2782)’, ZPE 24: 21–2.Google Scholar
Gronewald, M. 1979. ‘Ein Fragment aus den Aithiopica des Heliodor’, ZPE 34: 1921.Google Scholar
Grossardt, P. 2006. Einführung, Übersetzung und Kommentar zum Heroikos von Flavius Philostrat. 2 vols. Basel.Google Scholar
Grossardt, P. 2018. ‘Der Heroikos des Flavius Philostrat – eine Nachlese’, WS 131: 1375.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1993. ‘The Polis in the Hellenistic world’, in Rosen, R. M. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Nomodeiktes: Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald. Ann Arbor: 339–54.Google Scholar
Guidorizzi, G. 1979. ‘La pesca miracolosa (Isidoro, AP 9.94)’, RIL 113: 277–84.Google Scholar
Gurd, S. A. 2007. ‘Meaning and material presence: four epigrams on Timomachus’s unfinished Medea’, TAPhA 137: 305–31.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971a. The Sophists. Cambridge (= History of Greek Philosophy iii 1, Cambridge 1969).Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971b. Socrates. Cambridge (= History of Greek Philosophy iii 2, Cambridge 1969).Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 1991. Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies. Madison.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. 2004. ‘Seeing thought: Timomachus’ Medea and ecphrastic epigram’, AJP 125: 339–86.Google Scholar
Gyselinck, W. and Demoen, K. 2009. ‘Fiction and metafiction in Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii’, in Demoen, K. and Pratt, D. (eds.), Theios Sophistes. Essays on Flavius Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii. Mnemosyne Suppl. 305. Leiden and Boston: 95127.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. 1969. Die Inschriften des Asklepieions. Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. Altertümer von Pergamon viii 3. Berlin.Google Scholar
Habicht, C. 1985. Pausanias’ Guide to Ancient Greece. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Hadjimichael, T. A. 2019. The Emergence of the Lyric Canon. Oxford.Google Scholar
Haeberlin, K. 1887. Carmina figurata Graeca. Hannover.Google Scholar
Hagel, S. and Harrauer, C. (eds.) 2005. Ancient Greek Music in Performance. Symposion Wien 29.9–1.10. 2003 VÖAW. Wiener Studien Beihefte. Wien.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1971. Narrative Technique in Ancient Greek Romances. Studies of Chariton, Xenophon Ephesius, and Achilles Tatius. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1980. Den antika romanen. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1983. The Novel in Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. 1994. ‘Orality, literacy, and the “readership” of the early Greek novel’, in Eriksen, R. (ed.), Contexts of Pre-Novel Narrative: the European Tradition. Berlin and New York: 4781.Google Scholar
Halfmann, H. 1979. Die Senatoren aus dem östlichen Teil des Imperium Romanum bis zum Ende des 2. Jh. n.Chr. Hypomnemata 58. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Halfmann, H. 1986. Itinera Principum: Geschichte und Typologie der Kaiserreisen im Römischen Reich. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.) 2008. New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 1987. The Poetics of Aristotle: Translation and Commentary. London.Google Scholar
Hallström, A. 1910. ‘De aetate Antonii Diogenis’, Eranos 10: 200–1.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. 1983. Pastoral before Theocritus. New Haven.Google Scholar
Handley, E. 1982. ‘Aristophanes’ rivals’, Proceedings of the Classical Association 79: 23–5.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. 1981. ‘The number of Athenian hoplites in 431 BC’, SO 56: 1932 (repr. in Hansen, 1988).Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. 1988. Three Studies in Athenian Demography. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hansen, W. 1996. Phlegon of Tralles’ Book of Marvels. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Exeter.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. 2012. Callimachus Aetia. Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. 1983. Statius and the Silvae. Poets, Patrons and Epideixis in the Graeco-Roman World. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. 1997. ‘Philitas and the plane tree’, ZPE 119: 2136.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 1983. ‘Literacy and Epigraphy I’, ZPE 52: 87111.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. 1989. Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1998. ‘The Milesian Tales and the Roman Novel’, GCN 9: 6173.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2000. Apuleius: A Latin Sophist. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J., Paschalis, M. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.) 2005. Metaphor and the Ancient Novel. ANS 4. Groningen.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. and Irwin, E. K. (eds.) 2018. Interpreting Herodotus. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. 1968. ‘The Socratic self as it is parodied in Aristophanes’ Clouds’, YClS 22: 118.Google Scholar
Hawes, G. 2014. Rationalizing Myth in Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heberdey, R. and Wilhelm, G. A. 1896. Reisen in Kilikien ausgeführt 1891 und 1892 von R. Heberdey und A. Wilhelm. Denkschrift K. Akad. d. Wiss., phil.-hist. Kl., Bd. 44. Wien.Google Scholar
Hefti, V. 1950. Zur Erzählungstechnik in Heliodors Aethiopika. Wien.Google Scholar
Heiserman, A. 1977. The Novel before the Novel. Chicago.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. 1963–4. Die griechischen Dichterfragmente der römischen Kaiserzeit. 2 vols. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Heitsch, E. 1963. ‘Überlieferungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zu Andromachos, Markellos von Side und zum Carmen de viribus herbarum’, NGAW 1963.2: 2350.Google Scholar
Helmbold, W. C. and O’Neil, E. N. 1959. Plutarch’s Quotations. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1975. The Maculate Muse. New Haven (repr.Oxford 1991).Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1987. Aristophanes Lysistrata. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2008. Aristophanes Fragments, Vol. v. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2009. Longus: Daphnis and Chloe. Xenophon of Ephesus: Anthia and Habrocomes. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 1976. ‘The atheism of Prodicus’, CErc 6: 1521.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. 2011. ‘Missing pages: papyrology, genre, and the Greek novel’, in Obbink, D. and Rutherford, R. B. (eds.), Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons. Oxford: 302–22.Google Scholar
Hepding, H. 1910. ‘Die Arbeiten zu Pergamon, 1908–1909: II. Die Inschriften’, AM 35: 401–93.Google Scholar
Hernández Lara, C. 1994. Estudios sobre el Aticismo de Caritón de Afrodisias. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Herrmann, L. 1950. ‘La réplique d’Hadrien à Florus’, Latomus 9: 385–7.Google Scholar
Herrmann, L. 1951. ‘Anthologie palatine VII, 233 et 234’, AC 20: 101–2.Google Scholar
Herzog, R. 1934. ‘Ein Asklepios-Hymnos des Aristeides von Smyrna’, Sitzungsb. Preuss. A. Wiss., phil.-hist. Kl. 31: 734–69.Google Scholar
Herzog, R. 1941. ‘ap. K. Gerth’, Bursians Jahresb. 272: 99.Google Scholar
Hess, L. and Corien, B. 2020. ‘Narrator language and character language in Thucydides: A quantitative study of narrative perspective’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 35.3: 557–86.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., Russo, J. and West, S. R. 1988–92. A Commentary on the Odyssey. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hidber, T. 1996. Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass. Die praefatio zu De oratoribus veteribus. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Highet, G. 1949. The Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hitzl, K. and Kropp, A. J. M. 2013. ‘Das Heiligtum von Olympia im 2. Jh. n.Chr.’, Boreas 36: 5389.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. 2011. Authority and Tradition in Philostratus’ Heroikos. Lecce.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. 2012. ‘Attic idylls: hierarchies of herdsmen and social status in Alciphron and Longus’, JHS 132: 4153.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, O. 2013. ‘Aelian’s Rustic Epistles in the context of his corpus: a reassessment of Aelian’s literary programme and qualities’, in Vox, O. (ed.), Lettere, mimesi, retorica: Studi sull’epistolografia letteraria greca di età imperiale e tardo antica. Lecce: 257310.Google Scholar
Hodot, R. 1990. Le dialecte éolien d’Asie. La langue des inscriptions VIIe a.C.–IVe p.C. Paris.Google Scholar
Hoffa, W. 1912. ‘Die Löwenjagd des Kaisers Hadrians’, MDAI(R) 27: 97100.Google Scholar
Hogarth, D. G., Edgar, C.C. and Gutch, C. 1898–9. ‘Excavations at Naucratis’, ABSA 5: 2697.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. 1993. Aulus Gellius: An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement. London (1st ed. 1988).Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1986. Der antike Roman: Eine Einführung. Munich.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1988. ‘Ovids “Babyloniaka” (Met. 4,55–166)’, WS 101: 265–77.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. 1995. The Ancient Novel: An Introduction. London.Google Scholar
Hornblower, N. S. and Spawforth, A. (eds.) 2003. The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed. revised. Oxford.Google Scholar
Horna, K. 1928. Die Hymnen des Mesomedes. SAWW 207.1. Wien and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. 2006. Verrückt nach Frauen. Der Epigrammatiker Rufin. Classica Monacensia 31. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. 2007. ‘Journeys through ancient epigram books’, TAPhA 137: 333–69.Google Scholar
Höschele, R. 2018. ‘Two lovers and a lion: Pankrates’ poem on Hadrian’s royal hunt’, Philologus 162: 123.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. 1941. Literary Quotation and Allusion in Lucian. New York.Google Scholar
Howgego, C. J., Heuchert, V. and Burnett, A. (eds.) 2005. Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hubaux, J. and Leroy, M. 1939. Le mythe du phénix dans les littératures grecque et latine. Liège and Paris.Google Scholar
Hubaux, J. 1953. ‘Le dieu Amor chez Properce et chez Longus’, Acad. Roy. de Belgique (Bull. Cl. des lettres et des sc. mor. et pol.) 5.39: 263–70.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1991. The Mask of Comedy: Aristophanes and the Intertextual Parabasis. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1998. The Pipes of Pan: Intertextuality and Literary Filiation in the Pastoral Tradition from Theocritus to Milton. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 2006. ‘Virgil, Longus and the Pipes of Pan’, in Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden and Boston: 499513.Google Scholar
Humphrey, J. H. (ed.) 1991. Literacy in the Roman World. JRA Suppl. 3. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C. 2007. ‘Notes on Attic prosopography’, ZPE 160: 6575.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1983. A Study of Daphnis & Chloe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1993. ‘One party or two? Simonides 22 W2’, ZPE 99: 1114.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1994. ‘History and historicity in the romance of Chariton’, in ANRW ii 34.2: 1055–86.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1997. ‘Longus and Plato’, in Picone, M. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), Der antike Roman und seine mittelalterliche Rezeption. Basel: 1528 (repr. in Hunter, 2008: 775–89).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (ed.) 1998. Studies in Heliodorus. Cambridge Philological Society Supplementary Vol. 21. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 1999. Theocritus. A Selection. Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 13. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2003. ‘Aspects of technique and style in the “Periegesis” of Dionysius’, in Accorinti, D. and Chuvin, P. (eds.), Des géants à Dionysos: mélanges de mythologie et de poésie grecques offerts à Francis Vian. Alessandria: 343–56 (repr. in Hunter 2008: 700–17).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2004. ‘The Periegesis of Dionysius and the traditions of Hellenistic poetry’, REA 106: 217–31 (repr. in Hunter 2008: 718–36).Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2008. On Coming After: Studies in Post-Classical Literature and Its Reception. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. 2022. Greek Epitaphic Poetry. A Selection. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Inan, J. and Alföldi-Rosenbaum, E., 1979. Römische und frühbyzantinische Portratplastik aus der Turkei. Neue Funde. Mainz.Google Scholar
İplikçioğlu, B. 2014. ‘Heraklit von Rhodiapolis, ein gefeierter Arzt der trajanischen Zeit’, in Fischer, J. (ed.), Der Beitrag Kleinasiens zur Kultur-und Geistesgeschichte der griechisch-römischen Antike. Denkschriften der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, philosophisch-historischen Klasse 469. Wien: 231–56.Google Scholar
Irigoin, H., Waltz, P., Laurens, P. and Soury, G. (eds.) 1974. Anthologie Grecque ix. Paris.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. K. 2014. ‘Ethnography and empire: Homer and the Hippocratics in Herodotus’ Ethiopian logos, 3.17–26’, Histos 8: 2575.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. K. 2018. ‘The end of the Histories and the end of the Atheno-Peloponnesian wars’, in Harrison, and Irwin, (eds.): 279334.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. K. and Greenwood, E. (eds.) 2007. Reading Herodotus. A Study of the Logoi in Book 5 of Herodotus’ Histories. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Israelowich, I. 2012. Society, Medicine and Religion in the Sacred Tales of Aelius Aristides. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. 1981. ‘L’œil et la mémoire: sur la Périégèse de la terre habitée de Denys’, in Jacob, C. and Lestringant, F. (eds.), Arts et légendes d’espaces. Paris: 2397.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. 1990. La Description de la terre habitée de Denys d’Alexandrie, ou, la leçon de géographie. Paris.Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. 1813–17. Anthologia Graeca ad fidem codicis olim Palatini nunc Parisini ex apographo Gothano edita. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. 1913. ‘Herodot’, in Pauly-Wissowa-Kroll, RE Suppl. 2: 205520.Google Scholar
Jamot, P. 1895. ‘Fouilles de Thespies’, BCH 19: 311–85.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 1987. Aristotle Poetics, with the Tractatus Coislinianus, Reconstruction of Poetics II, and the Fragments of the On Poets, Translated with Notes. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jannasch., A. 1949. Kunst der Gegenwart. Renée Sintenis. Achtundvierzig Bilder. Potsdam.Google Scholar
Jansen, K. 2008. Herodes Atticus und seine Trophimoi. 2 vols. Münster.Google Scholar
Jensson, G. 2002. ‘The Satyrica of Petronius as Roman palimpsest’, AN 2: 86122.Google Scholar
Jensson, G. 2004. The Recollections of Petronius: The Satyrica of Petronius as Milesian Fiction. ANS 2. Groningen.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. 1967. The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, D. 2015. Latin Poetry and the Idea of Rome in the Greek Novel. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Jolowicz, D. 2021. Latin Poetry in the Ancient Greek Novels. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. 1952. ‘The economic basis of Athenian democracy’, Past and Present 1: 1331 (repr. in Jones, 1957: 321).Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. 1957. Athenian Democracy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1968. ‘A leading family of Roman Thespiae’, HSPh 74: 223–55.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1974. ‘The reliability of Philostratus’, in Bowersock, G. W. (ed.), Approaches to the Second Sophistic. University Park, PA: 1116.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1980. ‘Apuleius’ Metamorphoses and Lollianos’ Phoinikika’, Phoenix 34: 243–54.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1992a. ‘La personnalité de Chariton’, in Baslez, Hoffmann and Trédé, (eds.): 161–7.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1992b. ‘Hellenistic history in Chariton of Aphrodisias’, Chiron 22: 91102.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1993. ‘Greek drama in the Roman Empire’, in Scodel, (ed.): 952.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1996. ‘The Panhellenion’, Chiron 26: 2956.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1997. Review of J. M. Mossman, Plutarch and His Intellectual World, London 1997, EMC 1997: 527–30.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1998. ‘The pancratiasts Helix and Alexander on an Ostian mosaic’, JRA 11: 293–8.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 1999. Kinship Diplomacy in the Ancient World. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2001a. ‘Pausanias and his guides’, in Alcock, Cherry and Elsner, (eds.): 33–9.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2001b. ‘Time and place in Philostratus’ Heroicus’, JHS 121: 141–9.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2004. ‘Epigraphica VIIIIX’, ZPE 146: 93–8.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. 2011. ‘Julius Nicanor again’, ZPE 178: 7983.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. and Smith, R. R. R. 1994. ‘Two inscribed monuments of Aphrodisias’, Archaeologischer Anzeiger 3: 455–72.Google Scholar
Jong, I. de, 2012. ‘The Helen logos and Herodotus’ fingerprint’, in Baragwanath, and de Bakker, (eds.): 127–42.Google Scholar
Jope, J. 2011. ‘The authenticity of the Lucianic Erotes’, Helios 38: 103–20.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. and Laird, A. (eds.) 2002. A Companion to the Prologue to Apuleius’ Metamorphoses. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaimio, M. 1996. ‘How to enjoy a Greek novel: Chariton guiding his audience’, Arctos 30: 4973.Google Scholar
Kalinka, E. and Schönberger, O. 1968. Philostratos: Die Bilder. München.Google Scholar
Kalkmann, A. 1886. Pausanias der Perieget. Berlin.Google Scholar
Käppel, L. 1992. Paian. Studien zur Geschichte einer Gattung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kannicht, R. 1969. Euripides: Helena. 2 vols. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kapetanopoulos, E. A. 1994. ‘The Sarapion monument at Athens’, Prometheus 20: 234–42.Google Scholar
Karageorghis, V. 1981. Ancient Cyprus: 7,000 Years of Art and Archaeology. Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Karydis, D. N. and Kiel, M. 2000. Μυτιλήνης Αστυγραφία και Λέσβου Χωρογραφία. Athens.Google Scholar
Kazanskaya, M. 2019. ‘Indirect tradition on Sappho’s kertomia’, in Currie, and Rutherford, (eds.): 257–76.Google Scholar
Keil, J. 1930. ‘Vorläufiger Bericht über die Ausgrabungen in Ephesos’, JÖAI 26 Beiblatt: 57–8.Google Scholar
Keil, J. 1953. ‘Vertreter der zweiten Sophistik in Ephesos’, JÖAI 40: 526.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. 1987. ‘“Arcades ambo”: Virgil, Gallus and Arcadia’, Hermathena 143: 4759.Google Scholar
Kettelhake, S. 2010. Renée Sintenis. Berlin, Boheme und Ringelnatz. Berlin.Google Scholar
Keydell, R. 1941. ‘Die griechische Dichtung der Kaiserzeit’, Bursians Jahresbericht 272. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Keydell, R. 1982. Kleine Schriften. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kiel, H. 1956. Renée Sintenis. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kienast, D. 1995. ‘Zu den Homonoia-Vereinbarungen in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, ZPE 109: 267–82.Google Scholar
Killeen, J. F. 1971. ‘The comic costume controversy’, CQ 21: 51–4.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2010. Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 2017. ‘The trouble with Calasiris: duplicity and autobiographical narrative in Heliodorus and Galen’, Mnemosyne 72: 229–49.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. J. 1973. Homer in der Zweiten Sophistik. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Kindt, J. 2012. Rethinking Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirbihler, F. 2009. ‘Territoire civique et population d’Éphèse (ve siècle av. J.-C.–iiie siècle apr. J.-C.)’, in Bru, H., Kirbihler, F. and Lebreton, S. (eds.), L’Asie Mineure dans l’Antiquité: échanges, populations et territoires: regards actuels sur une péninsule. Actes du colloque de Tours, 21–22 octobre 2005. Rennes: 301–33.Google Scholar
Kirbihler, F. 2016. Des Grecs et des Italiens à Ephèse: histoire d’une intégration croisée: 133 a.C.–48 p.C. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Kleiner, D. E. E. 1983. The Monument of Philopappos in Athens. Rome.Google Scholar
Kleve, K. 1983. ‘Anti-Dover or Socrates in the Clouds’, SO 58: 2337.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. 1909. ‘Zu Dionysius Periegetes’, RhM 64: 476–7.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. 2011. The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. 2008. ‘ΤΟΣΣ’ ΕΔΑΗΝ: The Poetics of Knowledge in Oppian’s Halieutica’, Ramus 37: 3259.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. 2017. ‘The limits of enquiry in imperial Greek didactic poetry’, in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture, Cambridge: 203–30.Google Scholar
Kneebone, E. 2020. Oppian’s Halieutica: Charting a Didactic Epic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D. 1992. ‘Sept années de recherches sur l’épigraphie de la Béotie (1985–1991)’, Chiron 22: 411503.Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D. 1996. ‘La réorganisation du concours des Mouseia à l’époque hellénistique: esquisse d’une solution nouvelle’, in Hurst, A. and Schachter, A., La montagne des Muses. Genève: 141–67.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. 1989. ‘Pyramus and Thisbe in Cyprus’, HSPh 92: 315–28.Google Scholar
Koechly, H. 1858. Manethonis Apotelesmaticorum qui feruntur libri VI. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Körte, A. 1931. ‘Der Demeter-Hymnos des Philikos’, Hermes 66: 442–54.Google Scholar
Kondis, J. K. 1978. Λέσβος καὶ ἡ Μικρασιατική της Περιοχή. Αθήνα.Google Scholar
Kondoleon, C. 1994. Domestic and Divine: Roman Mosaics in the House of Dionysos. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1994. Sexual Symmetry: Love in the Ancient Novel and Related Genres. Princeton.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2008. ‘Antiphilus’ erotic epigrams: two notes’, Mnemosyne 61: 290–7.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2009. ‘Le courage dans le roman grec: de Chariton à Xénophon d’Éphèse, avec une référence a Philon d’Alexandrie’, in Pouderon, B. and Bost-Pouderon, C. (eds.), Passions, vertus et vices dans l’ancien roman. Lyon: 117–26.Google Scholar
Korres, M. 2002. ‘Modell des Dionysos-Theaters’, in Die griechische Klassik: Idee oder Wirklichkeit. Exhibition March 1st–June 2nd, 2002, Berlin. Mainz: 540–1.Google Scholar
Kossaifi, C. 2012. ‘The legend of Phatta in Longus’ Daphnis and Chloe’, AJPh 133: 573600.Google Scholar
Kost, K. 1971. Musaios, Hero und Leander. Bonn.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. 2013. ‘Dancing dolphins on the wine-dark sea’, in Kowalzig, and Wilson, (eds.): 3158.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.). 2013. Dithyramb in Context. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kowerski, L. M. 2005. Simonides on the Persian Wars. A Study of the Elegiac Verses of the ‘New Simonides’. New York and London.Google Scholar
Krausse, D. 1996. Hochdorf. 3: Das Trink- und Speiseservice aus dem späthallstattzeitlichen Fürstengrab von Eberdingen-Hochdorf (Kr. Ludwigsburg). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kruchió, B. 2017. ‘What Charicles knew: fragmentary narration and ambiguity in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica’, AN 14: 175–94.Google Scholar
Kuchenmüller, G. 1928. Philitae Coi reliquiae. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kühn, J.-H. 1958. ‘Die Thalysien Theokrits’, Hermes 86: 4079.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. L. 1999. ‘Culture and history at Pompey’s museum’, TAPhA 129: 343–73.Google Scholar
Kwapisz, J. 2013. The Greek Figure Poems. Hellenistica Groningana 19. Leuven.Google Scholar
Lada Richards, I. 2007. Silent Eloquence: Lucian and Pantomime Dancing. London.Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. L. 1986. Pagans and Christians. London.Google Scholar
Laplace, M. 2007. Le roman d’Achille Tatios: ‘discours panégyrique’ et imaginaire romanesque. Bern and Oxford.Google Scholar
Larson, J. 2001. Greek Nymphs: Myth, Cult, Lore. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. 1959. ‘Aux origines de l’Anthologie: II. Les Thalysies de Théocrite’, RhM 102: 307–30.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1986. ‘The empirical element in the methods of early Greek medical writers and Herodotus: a shared epistemological response’, Antichthon 20: 120.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1989. The Historical Method of Herodotus. Toronto and London.Google Scholar
Laurens, P. 1965. ‘Martial et l’épigramme grecque du 1er siècle après J.-C.’, REL 43: 315–41.Google Scholar
Latte, K. 1954. ‘Der Demeterhymnos des Philikos’, MH 11: 119 (repr. in his Kleine Schriften zu Religion, Recht, Literatur und Sprache der Griechen und Röme, eds. Gigon, O., Buchwald, W. and Kunkel., W. München 1968: 539–58).Google Scholar
Lambert, R. 1984. Beloved and God. London.Google Scholar
Lawall, G. 1967. Theocritus’ Coan Pastorals. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lebek, W. 1973. ‘Ein Hymnus auf Antinoos (Mitford, the Inscriptions of Kourion No. 104)’, ZPE 12: 101–37.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. and Fant, M. B. 1992. Women’s Life in Greece and Rome: A Source Book in Translation (1st ed. 1982). London.Google Scholar
Lefteratou, A. 2018. Mythological Narratives: The Bold and Faithful Heroines of the Greek Novel. Berlin.Google Scholar
Legras, B. 1999. Néotês: recherches sur les jeunes Grecs dans l’Egypte ptolémaïque et romaine. Genève.Google Scholar
Le Guen, B. 2001. Les associations de technites dionysiaques à l’époque hellénistique. 2 vols. Nancy.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. 1910. De Achillis Tatii aetate. Accedit corollarium De Achillis Tatii studiis Lucianeis. Dissertation, Wroclaw.Google Scholar
Lehnus, L. 1975. ‘Note Stesicoree: I poemetti “minori”’, SCO 24: 191–6.Google Scholar
Lenormant, C. 1847. François Gérard, peintre d’histoire: essai de biographie et de critique, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Leo, F. 1903. ‘Virgils erste und neunte Ecloge’, Hermes 38: 118 (repr. in Ausgewählte kleine Schriften, 2 vols. Roma 1960).Google Scholar
Lesky, A. 1966. A History of Greek Literature (= Geschichte der Griechischen Literatur, transl. by Willis, J. and de Heer, C.). London.Google Scholar
Leue, C. 1884. ‘Zeit und Heimat des Periegeten Dionysios’, Philologus 42: 175–8.Google Scholar
Leue, C. 1925. ‘Noch einmal die Akrostichen in der Periegese des Dionysios’, Hermes 60: 367–80.Google Scholar
LeVen, P. 2014. The Many-Headed Muse: Tradition and Innovation in Late Classical Greek Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Levi, D. 1944. ‘The novel of Ninus and Semiramis’, PAPhS 87: 420–8.Google Scholar
Levi, D. 1947. Antioch Mosaic Pavements. 2 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar
Levin, D. N. 1977. ‘To whom did the ancient novelists address themselves?’, Rivista di studi classici 25: 1829.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. 1955. ‘Notes on Attic Inscriptions (II). XXIII Who was Lysistrata?’, ABSA 50: 112.Google Scholar
Lidov, J. B. 2002. ‘Sappho, Herodotus, and the hetaira’, CPh 97: 203–37.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, C. S. 1988. ‘Facts and fiction – the third siege of Nisibis (AD 350)’, Historia 37: 107–25.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. 1999. Parthenius of Nicaea. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. 2003. Lucian. On the Syrian Goddess. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. 2014. Dionysius Periegetes, Description of the Known World. With Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lissarrague, F. 1990. The Aesthetics of the Greek Banquet. Princeton.Google Scholar
Livrea, E. 1973. Dionysii Bassarika. Rome.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. B. 1988. Herodotus: Book II. Commentary 99–182. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, P. H. J. and Parsons, P. J. 1983. Supplementum Hellenisticum. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lohse, G. 1966, ‘Die Kunstauffassung im VII Idyll Theokrits und das Programm des Kallimachos’, Hermes 94: 413–25.Google Scholar
López Martínez, M. P. 2019. ‘The Ninus romance: new textual and contextual studies’, Archiv für Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete 65.1: 2044.Google Scholar
Lopilato, R. 1998. The Apotelesmatika of Manetho. PhD thesis, Brown University.Google Scholar
L’Orange, H.-P. and van Gerkan, A. 1939. Der spätantike Bildschmuck des Konstantinbogens. Studien zur Spätantiken Kunstgeschichte 10. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. C. B. 1962. ‘The manuscript evidence for changes of speaker in Aristophanes’, BICS 9: 2742.Google Scholar
Lucas, D. W. 1968. Aristotle Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luginbill, R. D. 2001–2. ‘A delightful possession: Longus’ Prologue and Thucydides’, CJ 97: 233–47.Google Scholar
Lulli, L. 2011. Narrare in distichi. L’elegia greca arcaica e classica di argomento storico-mitico. Seminari romani di cultura greca, Quaderni 13. Rome.Google Scholar
Luz, C. 2010. Technopaignia. Formspiele in der griechischen Dichtung. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Ma, J. 2007. ‘The worlds of Nestor the poet’, in Swain, S. C. R., Harrison, S. J. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Severan Culture. Cambridge: 83133.Google Scholar
Maass, E. 1898. Commentariorum in Aratum reliquiae. Berlin.Google Scholar
MacDowell, D. M. 1971. Aristophanes Wasps. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. 2012. Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica: Engaging Homer in Late Antiquity. Mnemosyne Suppl. 343. Leiden.Google Scholar
Maclean, J. K. B. and Aitken, E. B. 2001. Flavius Philostratus: Heroikos. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Macleod, M. D. 1967. Lucian, with an English translation. Vol. viii. London and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Macleod, M. D. 1987. Luciani Opera. Vol. iv. Oxford.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. 1982. ‘Roman attitudes to Greek love’, Historia 31: 484502.Google Scholar
MacQueen, B. D. 1985. ‘Longus and the myth of Chloe’, ICS 10: 119–34.Google Scholar
MacQueen, B. D. 1990. Myth, Rhetoric and Fiction: a Reading of Longus’s Daphnis and Chloe. Lincoln, NE and London.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. 1976. ‘Der Metiochos-Parthenope-Roman’, ZPE 23: 120.Google Scholar
Magie, D. 1950. Roman Rule in Asia Minor. 2 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar
Magnelli, E. 2007a. ‘Meter and diction: from refinement to mannerism’, in Bing, and Bruss, (eds.): 165–83.Google Scholar
Magnelli, E. 2007b. ‘Notes on four Greek verse inscriptions’, ZPE 160: 3740.Google Scholar
Mai, A. 1823. M. Cornelii Frontonis et M. Avrelii imperatoris epistvlae. L. Veri et Antonini Pii et Appiani epistvlarvm reliqviae. Fragmenta Frontonis et scripta grammatica. Editio prima romana plvs centvm epistvlis avcta ex codice rescripto Bibliothecae pontificiae Vaticanae cvrante Angelo Maio bibliothecae eivsdem praefecto. Roma.Google Scholar
Manieri, A. (ed.) 2009. Agoni poetico musicali nella Grecia antica. 1. Beozia. Testi e commenti 25; Certamina musica graeca 1. Pisa/Roma.Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, I. 2004. ‘Griechische Kunst und römischer Stil: Zum Eurotas-Epigramm des Philipp von Thessalonike (AP 9.709 = GP I 63)’, WJA N.F. 28a: 3548.Google Scholar
Mantero, T. 1966. Ricerche sull’ Heroikos di Filostrato. Genova.Google Scholar
Marcos Macedo, J. 2010. A palavra ofertada. Campinas.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. 1975. ‘Philodamus’ Delphic hymn to Dionysus’, ZPE 17: 167–8.Google Scholar
Maritz, J. 1991. ‘The role of music in Daphnis and Chloe’, GCN 4: 5767.Google Scholar
Maróth, M. 1979. ‘Le siège de Nisibe en 350 ap. J.C. d’après les sources syriennes’, AAntHung 27: 239–43.Google Scholar
Martin, F. 1982. La documentación griega de la cancillería del emperador Adriano. Pamplona.Google Scholar
Martin, L. H. 1994. ‘The anti-individualistic ideology of Hellenistic culture’, Numen 41: 117–40.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. 1989. The Language of Heroes. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 1978. ‘Fabula Graecanica: Apuleius and his Greek sources’, in Hijmans, B. L. and van der Paardt, R. T. (eds.), Aspects of the Golden Ass. Groningen: 115 (repr. in S. J. Harrison (ed.), Oxford Readings in the Roman Novel. Oxford 1999: 217–36).Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 1979. ‘Longus and the topography of Lesbos’, TAPhA 109: 149–63.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 1995. ‘Romance in a limestone landscape’, CPh 90: 263–6.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 2004. ‘Sappho’s apples’, in Zimmerman, M. and van der Paardt, R. (eds.), Metamorphic Reflections: Essays Presented to Ben Hijmans at His Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Leuven and Dudley, MA: 243–53.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. 2018. ‘Hunters’ dedications: Longus and Lesbos’, in Chew, Morgan and Trzaskoma, (eds.): 137–47.Google Scholar
Massimilla, G. 2016. ‘Nel laboratorio del parafraste: i richiami alla poesia ellenistica nella Parafrasi del Vangelo di San Giovanni di Nonno di Panopoli’, Prometheus 42: 249–79.Google Scholar
Matthews, V. J. (ed.) 1996. Antimachus of Colophon: Text and Commentary. Mnemosyne Suppl. 155. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Maull, I. 1955. ‘Hadrians Jagddenkmal’, JÖAI 42: 5367.Google Scholar
Maxwell-Stuart, P. G. 1972. ‘Strato and the Musa puerilis’, Hermes 100: 215–40.Google Scholar
May, R. 2010. ‘An Ass from Oxyrhynchus: P.Oxy. LXX.4762, Loukios of Patrae and the Milesian Tales’, AN 8: 5984.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. forthcoming. ‘Crinagoras of Mytilene and Octavia’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Arthur-Montagne, J. and Vasunia, P. (eds.) Hellenistic Literature and Culture: Studies in Honor of Susan A. Stephens. London.Google Scholar
Mazal, O. 1971. Aristaeneti Epistularum Libri II. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Mayor, H. B. 1939. ‘The strategi at Athens in the fifth century. When did they enter on office?’, JHS 59: 4564.Google Scholar
Melfi, M. 2010. ‘Ritual spaces and performances in the Asklepieia of Roman Greece’, ABSA 105: 317–38.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. 1962. Roman und Mysterium in der Antike. München.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. 1987. Nikaia in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Opladen.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. 1988. Die Hirten des Dionysos: die Dionysos-Mysterien der römischen Kaiserzeit und der bukolische Roman des Longus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. and Stauber, J. (eds.) 1998–2004. Steinepigramme aus dem griechischen Osten. 5 vols. Stuttgart. 2001 vol. ii. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Mesk, J. 1927. ‘Zu den Prosa und Vershymnen des Aelius Aristides’, in Gemelli, A. (ed.) Raccolta di scritti in onore di F. Ramorino. Milan: 660–72.Google Scholar
Mignogna, E. 1996a. ‘Narrativa greca e mimo: il romanzo di Achille Tazio’, SIFC iii 14: 232–42.Google Scholar
Mignogna, E. 1996b. ‘Il mimo Leucippe: un’ ipotesi su PBerol inv. 13927 [Pack2 2437]’, RCCM 38: 161–6.Google Scholar
Miguelez-Cavero, L. 2013. Triphiodorus, The Sack of Troy: A General Study and a Commentary. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Miguélez-Cavero, L. 2016. ‘Nonnus and the novel’, in Accorinti, D. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Nonnus of Panopolis. Leiden and Boston: 549–73.Google Scholar
Miles, G. 2017. Philostratus: Interpreters and Interpretation. London.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. 1981. ‘The world of The Golden Ass’, JRS 71: 6375.Google Scholar
Millis, B. W. and Olson, S. D. 2012. Inscriptional Records for the Dramatic Festivals in Athens: IG II2 2318–2325 and Related Texts. Leiden.Google Scholar
Milne, J. G. 1933. University of Oxford. Ashmolean Museum. Catalogue of Alexandrian Coins. Oxford and London.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1990. ‘Festivals, games, and civic life in Roman Asia Minor’, a review of Wörrle 1998 in JRS 80: 183–93.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. 1993. Anatolia. Men and Gods in Asia Minor. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mitford, T. B. 1971. The Inscriptions of Kourion. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 83. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Möller, A. 2000. Naukratis: Trade in Archaic Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Molinié, G. 1979. Chariton. Le roman de Chaireas et Callirhoé. Paris.Google Scholar
Molyneux, J. H. 1992. Simonides: A Historical Study. Wauconda.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2000. Silence in the Land of Logos. Princeton.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2012. ‘The (cultural) harmony of nature: music, love, and order in Daphnis and Chloe’, TAPhA 142: 133–56.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2020a. ‘The silences of Chariclea in Heliodorus’ Aethiopica: from cunning to shame’, in Papadodima, (ed.): 7383.Google Scholar
Montiglio, S. 2020b. Musaeus’ Hero and Leander. Introduction, Greek Text, Translation and Commentary. London.Google Scholar
Morales, H. 2004. Vision and Narrative in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Clitophon. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moretti, J.-C. 1999–2000. ‘The theatre of the sanctuary of Dionysos Eleuthereus in late 5th century Athens’, ICS 24–5: 377–98.Google Scholar
Moretti, L. 1978. ‘Frammento di inno tardo-stoico sulla creazione’, in Gasperini, L. (ed.), Scritti storico-epigrafici in memoria di M. Zambelli. Roma: 251–6.Google Scholar
Moretti, L. 1981. ‘Iscrizioni di Tespie della prima età imperiale’, Athenaeum 59: 71–7.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1978. A Commentary on the Ninth and Tenth Books of the Aithiopica of Heliodoros. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1982. ‘History, romance and realism in Heliodorus’, ClAnt 1: 221–65.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1985. ‘Lucian’s True Histories and the Wonders beyond Thule of Antonios Diogenes’, CQ 35: 475–90.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1989a. ‘Heliodorus’, in Reardon, (ed.): 349588.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1989b. ‘The story of Knemon in Heliodorus’ Aithiopika’, JHS 109: 99113 (repr. in Swain 1999: 259–85).Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1993. ‘Make-believe and make believe: the fictionality of the Greek novels’, in Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter: 175229.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1994. ‘Daphnis and Chloe: love’s own sweet story’, in Morgan, and Stoneman, (eds.): 6479.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1996a. ‘Heliodorus’, in Schmeling, (ed.): 417456.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 1996b. Review of O’Sullivan 1995, JHS 116: 199200.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 2004. Longus Daphnis and Chloe, with an Introduction, Translation and Notes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. 2021. ‘Longus’, in de Bakker, M. and de Jong, I. (eds.), Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume 5. Mnemosyne Suppl. 448. Leiden and Boston: 692714.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. and Harrison, S. J. 2008. ‘Intertextuality’, in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel. Cambridge: 218–36.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. and Stoneman, R. (eds.) 1994. Greek Fiction: The Greek Novel in Context. London.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 1998. Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mori, A. 2008. The Politics of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. S. 1941. ‘The place of Protagoras in Athenian public life’, CQ 25: 116.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. S. 1958. ‘The origins of Plato’s philosopher-statesman’, CQ 8: 198218.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. M. 1996. ‘Chains of imagery in Prometheus Bound’, CQ 46: 5867.Google Scholar
Mossman, J. M. 2007. ‘Heracles, Prometheus, and the play of genres in [Lucian]’s Amores’, in Swain, Elsner and Harrison, (eds.): 146–59.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1989. ‘The stranger’s stratagem: self-disclosure and self-sufficiency in Greek culture’, JHS 109: 114–33.Google Scholar
Moulin, M. 1983. ‘Daphnis et Chloé dans l’œuvre de François Gérard (1770–1837)’, Revue du Louvre et des Musées de France 2: 100–9.Google Scholar
Müller, C. 1861. Geographi Graeci Minores. 2 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. 1981. ‘Der griechische Roman’, in Vogt, E. (ed.), Neues Handbuch der Literaturwissenschaft ii, Griechische Literatur. Wiesbaden: 377412.Google Scholar
Münscher, K. 1907. Die Philostrate. Philologus Suppl. 10. Leipzig: 469558.Google Scholar
Münscher, K. 1920. Xenophon in der griechisch-römischen Literatur. Philologus Suppl. 13.2. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Munson, R. V. 2001. Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. T. 1938. ‘Aristophanes and the art of rhetoric’, HSPh 1938: 69113.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1983a. ‘The Greek symposion in history’, in Gabba, E. (ed.), Tria Corda: scritti in onore di Arnaldo Momigilano. Como: 257–72 (repr. in Murray, 2018).Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1983b. ‘The symposion as social organisation’, in Hägg, R. (ed.), The Greek Renaissance of the Eighth Century BC: Tradition and Innovation. Stockholm: 195–9 (repr. in Murray 2018).Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1985. ‘Symposium and genre in the poetry of Horace’, JRS 75: 3950 (repr. in Murray 2018).Google Scholar
Murray, O. (ed.) 1990, Sympotica. A Symposium on the Symposion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1993. Early Greece. London (1st ed. Hassocks 1980).Google Scholar
Murray, O. and Tecuşan, M. (eds.) 1995. In Vino Veritas. London.Google Scholar
Murray, O. 1996. ‘Hellenistic royal symposia’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L. and Zahn, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship. Aarhus: 1527 (repr. in Murray 2018).Google Scholar
Murray, O. 2018. The Symposion: Drinking Greek Style. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2015. ‘Herodotus and a courtesan from Naucratis’, Classical Inquiries 2015.07.01: http://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard.edu/herodotus-and-a-courtesan-from-naucratis/.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2018. ‘Herodotus on queens and courtesans of Egypt’, in Bowie, (ed.): 109–22.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 2019. ‘Homo ludens at play with the songs of Sappho: experiments in comparative reception theory, Part Two’, Classical Inquiries 2019.01.16: https://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard.edu/homo-ludens-at-play-with-the-songs-of-sappho-experiments-in-comparative-reception-theory-part-two/.Google Scholar
Nannini, S. 1982. ‘Alcm. fr. 50b P. ‘ἼΝΩ ΣΑΛΑΣΣΟΜΈΔΟΙΣ’ ἋΝ ἈΠῸ ΜΑΣΔΩΝ’, Sileno 7: 4951.Google Scholar
Nauck, A. 1889. ‘Zu Dionysios Periegetes’, Hermes 24: 325.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. 2002. Poetry for Patrons. Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Mnemosyne Suppl. 206. Leiden.Google Scholar
Neppi Modona, Α. 1933. L’isola di Coo nell’Antichità classica: delineazione storica in base alle fonti letterarie e ai documenti archeologici ed epigrafici. Mem. ist. storico-arch. di Rodi 1. Rodi.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 1996. ‘Herodot und der griechische Mythos’, Poetica 28: 275–96.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, O. and van Hosen, H. B. 1959. Greek Horoscopes. Mem. Amer. Philos. Soc. 48. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Neutsch, B. 1938. ‘Bildbeschreibungen des Antiphilos von Byzans’, MDAI(R) 53: 175–88.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2003. ‘Art and identity in Asia Minor’ in Scott, S. and Webster, J. (eds.), Roman Imperialism and Provincial Art. Cambridge: 192213.Google Scholar
Newiger, H.-J. 1957. Metapher und Allegorie: Studien zu Aristophanes. München.Google Scholar
Newiger, H.-J. 1980. ‘War and peace in the comedies of Aristophanes’, YClS 26: 219–37 (repr. in Segal, E. (ed.), Oxford Readings in Aristophanes. Oxford 1997: 143–61).Google Scholar
Nikolaou, K. 1963. ‘The mosaics from Kato Paphos, the House of Dionysos’, RDAC 5672.Google Scholar
Nikolaou, K. 1967. ‘Excavations at Nea Paphos, the House of Dionysos: outline of the campaigns 1964–1965’, RDAC 100–25.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. 2005. Lucian’s Self-Conscious Fiction. Theory in Practice. PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. 2008. ‘Pseudo-documentarism and the limits of ancient fiction’, AJPh 129: 403–31.Google Scholar
Ní Mheallaigh, K. 2014. Reading Fiction with Lucian: Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nisbet, G. 2003. Greek Epigram in the Roman Empire. Martial’s Forgotten Rivals. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 1978. ‘Felicitas at Surrentum (Statius, Silvae II. 2)’, JRS 68: 111.Google Scholar