Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of symbols
- 1 Scope, motivation, and orientation
- Part I Classical theory
- Part II Quantum Theory
- 13 Quantizing the Abraham model
- 14 The statistical mechanics connection
- 15 States of lowest energy: statics
- 16 States of lowest energy: dynamics
- 17 Radiation
- 18 Relaxation at finite temperatures
- 19 Behavior at very large and very small distances
- 20 Many charges, stability of matter
- References
- Index
13 - Quantizing the Abraham model
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- List of symbols
- 1 Scope, motivation, and orientation
- Part I Classical theory
- Part II Quantum Theory
- 13 Quantizing the Abraham model
- 14 The statistical mechanics connection
- 15 States of lowest energy: statics
- 16 States of lowest energy: dynamics
- 17 Radiation
- 18 Relaxation at finite temperatures
- 19 Behavior at very large and very small distances
- 20 Many charges, stability of matter
- References
- Index
Summary
Classical theories must emerge from quantum mechanics and there is no reason to expect a simple recipe which would yield the physically correct quantum theory from the classical input. On the other hand, at least in the nonrelativistic domain, the rules of canonical quantization have served well and it is natural to apply them to the Abraham model. There is one immediate difficulty. Canonical quantization starts from identifying the canonical variables of the classical theory. Thus we first have to rewrite the equations of motion for the Abraham model in Hamiltonian form. For this purpose we adopt the Coulomb gauge, as usual, so as to eliminate the constraints. In the quantized version we thereby obtain the Pauli–Fierz Hamiltonian which has an obvious extension to include spin.
We have to ensure that the Pauli–Fierz Hamiltonian generates a unitary time evolution on the appropriate Hilbert space of physical states. Mathematically this means that we have to specify conditions under which the Pauli–Fierz Hamiltonian is a self-adjoint operator, an issue which can be satisfactorily resolved. Still, the true physical situation is more subtle and in fact not so well understood. It is related to the abundance of very low-energy photons, i.e the infrared problem, and to the arbitrariness of the cutoff at high energies, i.e. the ultraviolet problem. There are many items of interest before these, and it will take us a while to start discussing these subtleties.
Some words on our notation: In the beginning we keep c, ħ, and later set them equal to one, mostly without notice.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dynamics of Charged Particles and their Radiation Field , pp. 149 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004