Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-558cb97cc8-mtzvg Total loading time: 1.3 Render date: 2022-10-07T20:20:37.246Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2018

Thomas Bénatouïl
Affiliation:
Université de Lille
Katerina Ierodiakonou
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackrill, J. L. (trans.) (1963) Aristotle, Categories and De Interpretatione, with comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. (1973) Negative Dialectic (1966), trans. Ashton, E. B.. New York.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. and Horkheimer, M. (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (1947), ed. Noerr, G. S., trans. Jephcott, E.. Stanford.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. (1984) ‘The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome’, AJPh 105: 174208.Google Scholar
Alessandrelli, M. (2013) Il problema del λεκτόν nello Stoicismo antico. Florence.Google Scholar
Alessandrelli, M. and Ranocchia, G. (2017) Scrittore stoico anonimo: opera incerta. PHerc. 1020, coll. 104–112, ILIESI digitale. Testi e tradizioni 1: 4459. Last accessed 16 December 2017, www.iliesi.cnr.it/pubblicazioni/Testi-01-Alessandrelli_Ranocchia.pdf.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (1997) ‘Chrysippus, Carneades, Cicero: the ethical divisiones in Cicero’s Lucullus’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (1997): 107–139.CrossRef
Algra, K. (forthcoming) ‘Cosmology and mathematics in Stoicism’.
Allen, J. (1994) ‘Academic probabilism and Stoic epistemology’, CQ 44: 85113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. (1997) ‘Carneadean argument in Cicero’s Academic books’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (1997): 217–256.CrossRef
Allen, J. (2001) Inferences from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2007) ‘Aristotle on the disciplines of argument’, Rhetorica 25: 87108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. (2014) ‘Aristotle on the value of “probability,” persuasiveness, and verisimilitude, in rhetorical argument’, in Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought, ed. Wohl, V.. Cambridge: 4764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. (1988) ‘The heirs of Socrates’, Phronesis 33: 100–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. (1989) ‘Cicero on Stoic moral philosophy and private property’, in Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 151173.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1990) ‘Stoic epistemology’, in Epistemology: Cambridge Companions to Ancient Thought I, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: 184203.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1992) ‘Plato the sceptic’, OSAPh supp. vol. 3: 4372.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2007) ‘Carneades’ classification of ethical theories’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–8, eds. Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. N.. Naples: 189223.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (trans.) (2000) Sextus Empiricus: The Outlines of Scepticism, 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989) Sapientiae facies: étude sur les images de Sénèque. Paris.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von (1898) Leben und Werke des Dio von Prusa mit einer Einleitung: Sophistik, Rhetorik Philosophie in ihrem Kampf um die Jugendbildung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. (1903) ‘Dionysius von Herakleia’, RE V 1: 973974.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. (ed.) (1903–1924) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta. (4 vols.). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1988) ‘Hand over fist: the failure of Stoic rhetoric’, CQ 38: 392427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2006) Per dumeta: recherches sur la rhétorique des Stoïciens à Rome, de ses origines grecques jusqu’à la fin de la République, PhD thesis under the supervision of Professor Carlos Lévy, University Paris IV–Sorbonne. Paris.Google Scholar
Aubert-Baillot, S. (2008) ‘Cicéron et la parole stoïcienne: polémique autour de la dialectique’, RMM 1: 6191.Google Scholar
Auvray-Assayas, C. (2009) ‘Les Topica de Cicéron et Aristote: réévaluation d’un projet philosophique’, in Les lieux de l’argumentation: histoire du syllogisme topique d’Aristote à Leibniz, eds. Biard, J. and Zini, F. Mariani. Turnhout: 5364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babut, D. (2005) ‘Sur les polémiques des anciens Stoïciens’, PhilosAnt 5: 6591.Google Scholar
Badawi, A. (1968) La transmission de la Philosophie grecque au monde arabe. Paris.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. (1976) Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten, vol. I. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, M. (1993) Der Platonismus in der Antike, vol. III (§73–100). Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. (1998) Der Platonismus in der Antike, vol. V (§125–150). Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Baltes, M. (2002) Der Platonismus in der Antike, vol. VI (§151–181). Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2000) Theophrastus against the Presocratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in the De Sensibus. Leiden, Boston and Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982) ‘Medicine, experience and logic’, in Science and Speculation, eds. Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 2468. Reprinted in Barnes (2012): 538–581.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1985a) ‘Theophrastus and Stoic logic’, in Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung: Paul Moraux gewidmet I, ed. Wiesner, J.. Berlin: 557576. Reprinted in Barnes (2012), 413‒432.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1985b) ‘ΠΙΘΑΝΑ ΣΥΝΗΜΜΕΝΑ’, Elenchos 2: 454467.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1988) ‘Is rhetoric an art?’, University of Calgary DARG Newsletter 2: 222.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990a) ‘Logical form and logical matter’, in Logica, mente e persona, ed. Alberti, A.. Florence: 7119. Revised edn. in Barnes (2012): 43–146.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990b) The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1991) ‘Galen on logic and therapy’, in Galen’s Method of Healing, eds. Kudlien, F. and Durling, R. J.. Leiden: 50102.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993a) ‘Galen and the utility of logic’, in Galen und das hellenistische Erbe, ed. Nickel, D.. Stuttgart: 3351.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993b) ‘A big, big D?’, CR 43: 304306. Reprinted in Barnes (2012): 479–484.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996a) ‘Epicurus: meaning and thinking’, in Epicureismo greco e romano, eds. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M.. Naples: 197220.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996b) ‘The catalogue of Chrysippus’ logical works’, in Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday, eds. Algra, K. et al. Leiden: 169184.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997a) ‘Logic in Academica I and the Lucullus’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (1997): 140–160.CrossRef
Barnes, J. (1997b) ‘The beliefs of a Pyrrhonist’, in Burnyeat, and Frede, (1997): 58–91. First published in (1982) Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 28:129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1999) ‘Aristotle and Stoic logic’, in Topics in Stoic Philosophy, ed. Ierodiakonou, K.. Oxford: 2353.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2007) Truth, etc. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2011) ‘Reading the hypotheticals’, in Arguments from Hypothesis in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Longo, A.. Naples: 187280.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2012) Logical Matters: Essays in Ancient Philosophy II, ed. by Bonelli, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bastianini, G. and Sedley, D. (ed.) (1995) ‘Commentarium in Platonis Theaetetum (P. Berol. inv. 9782)’, in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini. Parte III: Commentari, with trans. and comm. Florence: 227562.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2006) Faire usage: la pratique du Stoïcisme. Paris.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2007) ‘Le débat entre platonisme et stoïcisme sur la vie scolastique: Chrysippe, la Nouvelle Académie et Antiochus’, in Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity, eds. Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, Ch.. Leuven: 121.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2010) ‘Les critiques épicuriennes de la géometrie’, in Construction: Festschrift for Gerhard Heinzmann. Eds. Bour, P.-E., Rebuschi, M. and Rollet, L.. London: 151162.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (forthcoming) ‘Epictetus and the early imperial epistemological debate: his strategy against scepticism and his targets’.
Bénatouïl, T. and El Murr, D. (2010) ‘L’Académie et les géomètres: usages et limites de la géométrie de Platon à Carnéade’, PhilosAnt 10: 4180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berner, C. (1996) ‘Polémique, conflit, contradiction: notes sur la fondation dialectique de la philosophie chez Schlegel, Schleiermarcher et Hegel’, Philosophie 51: 4758.Google Scholar
Berra, A. (2008) Théorie et pratique de l’énigme en Grèce ancienne, doctoral thesis, Paris. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00674183/. Last accessed 15 January 2018.Google Scholar
Besnier, B. (1994) ‘Epicure et la définition’, in Ainsi parlaient les anciens, eds. Jerphagnon, L., Lagrée, J. and Delattre, D.. Lille: 117–30.Google Scholar
Beta, S. (2012) ‘Gli enigmi simposiali dagli indovinelli scherzosi ai problemi filosofici’, in Ainigma e griphos: gli antichi e l’oscurità della parola, ed. Monda, S.. Florence: 6980.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2006) ‘Epicurus’ argument for atomism’, OSAPh 30: 261284.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1989) ‘Carneades’ pithanon: a reappraisal of its role and status’, OSAPh 7: 5994.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1999) ‘Reactions to Aristotle in the Greek sceptical tradition’, Methexis 12: 1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (2000) Pyrrho, His Antecedents and His Legacy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (trans.) (2005) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignone, E. (1920) Epicuro. Bari.Google Scholar
Bignone, E. (1936) L’Aristotele perduto a la formazione filosofica di Epicuro. Florence.Google Scholar
Black, D. (1990) Logic and Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1993) ‘Chrysippus modal logic and its relation to Philo and Diodorus’, in Döring and Ebert (1993): 63–84.
Bobzien, S. (1996) ‘Stoic syllogistic’, OSAPh 14: 133192.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998) Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1999) ‘Logic: the Stoics (part 2)’, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds. Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 106108.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002a) ‘Pre-Stoic hypothetical syllogistic in Galen’s Institutio Logica’, in The Unknown Galen, BICS vol. 77, ed. Nutton, V.. London: 5772.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002b) ‘The development of modus ponens in antiquity: from Aristotle to the 2nd century AD’, Phronesis 47: 359394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002c) ‘Chrysippus and the epistemic theory of vagueness’, PAS 102: 217238.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2003) ‘Logic’ in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 85123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2011) ‘Dialectical school’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/dialectical-school/.
Bocheński, I. M. (1947) La logique de Théophraste. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2003a) Academici e Platonici: il dibattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2003b) ‘Un dibattito tra academici e platonici sull’eredità di Platone: la testimonianza del commentario anonimo al Teeteto, in Papiri filosofici: Miscellanea di studi IV. Florence: 4174.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2012) ‘Plutarch on the difference between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics’, OSAPh 43: 271298.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2015) À la recherche des idées: Platonisme et philosophie hellénistique d’Antiochus à Plotin, Paris.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M. (2017) ‘The Platonist appropriation of Stoic epistemology’, in From Stoicism to Platonism: The Development of Philosophy, 100 BCE–100 CE, ed. Engberg-Pedersen, T.. Cambridge: 120141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonhöffer, A. (1890) Epictet und die Stoa. Stuttgart 1890. Reprinted Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt 1968.
Bonitz, H. (1870) Index Aristotelicus. Reprinted Graz 1955.
Boudon, V. (ed.) (2007) Galien: introduction générale. Sur l’ordre de ses propres livres. Sur ses propres livres. Que l’excellent médecin est aussi philosophe, with trans. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. (2005) ‘Panarces’, in Brill’s New Pauly. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1574–9347_bnp_e905410. Last accessed 15 December 2017.CrossRef
Boyancé, P. (1964) ‘Le stoïcisme à Rome’, in Actes du VIIe Congrès de l’Association G. Budé, Aix-en-Provence, 1–6 avril 1963. Paris: 218254.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2018) Platonist Philosophy 80BC to AD250, with trans. and comm. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brandis, C. A. (1827) ‘Über die Schicksale der Aristotelischen Bücher, und einige Kriterien ihrer Ächtheit’, RhM 1: 236286.Google Scholar
Brandis, C. A. (1860) Handbuch der Geschichte der Griechisch-Römischen Philosophie, vol. III.1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bréhier, É. (1971) Chrysippe et l’ancien stoïcisme, 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (1996) ‘Reasonable impressions in Stoicism’, Phronesis 41: 318334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, T. (2005) The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duty, and Fate. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2005a) ‘Arcesilaus’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/arcesilaus/.
Brittain, C. (2005b) ‘Common sense: concepts, definition and meaning in and out of the Stoa’, in Language and Learning, eds. Frede, D. and Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 164209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, C. (2006) Cicero: On Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2008) ‘Philo of Larissa’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/philo-larissa/.
Brittain, C. (2014) ‘The compulsion of Stoic assent’, in Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic, ed. Lee, Mi-Kyoung. New York: 332355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, C. and Palmer, J. (2001) ‘The New Academy’s appeals to the Presocratics’, Phronesis 46: 3872.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. (2009) ‘The possibilities of being and not-being in De caelo I.12’, in New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De caelo, eds. Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, Ch.. Leiden: 2950.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2002) ‘Sagehood and the Stoics’, OSAPh 23: 181224.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2007) ‘The early Stoic doctrine of the change to wisdom’, OSAPh 33: 285315.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (ed. and trans.) (1967–2007) Aristote: Topiques. (2 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (ed.) (1978) Les Stoïciens et leur logique. Paris. 2nd edn. 2006.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1980) ‘Proof defined’, in Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, eds. Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 125160.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1984) ‘Remarques sur la théorie stoïcienne du nom propre’, Histoire Epistémologie Langage 6: 319. Reprinted in Brunschwig (1995), 116–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1988) ‘La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprême et l’ ontologie platonicienne’, in Matter and Metaphysics, eds. Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M.. Naples: 19127.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1991) ‘On a book-title by Chrysippus: “On the fact that the ancients admitted dialectic along with demonstrations”’, OSAPh supp. vol.: 81–95.
Brunschwig, J. (1994) ‘Rhétorique et dialectique. Rhétorique et topiques’, in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, eds. Furley, D. J. and Nehamas, A.. Princeton: 5796.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1995) Études sur les philosophies hellénistiques. ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1996) ‘Aristotle’s rhetoric as a “counterpart” to dialectic’, in Essays in Aristotle’s Rhetoric, ed. Rorty, A. Oksenberg, Berkeley: 3455.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1986) ‘Cicero’s officium in the civil war’, JRS 76: 1232.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1976) ‘Protagoras and self-refutation in later Greek philosophy’, Philosophical Review 85: 4469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982a) ‘Gods and heaps’, in Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy, eds. Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M.. Cambridge: 315338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982b) ‘Idealism and Greek philosophy: what Descartes saw and Berkeley missed’, PhR 91: 340.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1994) ‘Enthymeme: Aristotle on the logic of persuasion’, in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, eds. Furley, D. J. and Nehamas, A.. Princeton: 355.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997) ‘Antipater and self-refutation: elusive arguments in Cicero’s Academica’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (1997): 277–310.CrossRef
Burnyeat, M. F. (2012) ‘Gods and heaps’, in Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, vol. I. Cambridge: 90111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (unpublished) ‘Carneades was no probabilist’. Unpublished paper, s.l.
Burnyeat, M. et al. (1984) Notes on Eta and Theta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. and Frede, M. (eds.) (1997) The Original Sceptics: A Controversy. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. (trans.) (1935) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bury, R. G. (1949) (trans.) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Professors. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. (1977) ‘Il problema dell’ esistenza di una scuola Megarica’, in Scuole socratiche minori e filosofia ellenistica, ed. Giannantoni, G.. Bologna: 2553.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2004) ‘Il condizionale crisippeo e le sue interpretazioni moderne’, Elenchos 25: 353395.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010a) Ancient Self-Refutation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010b) ‘How dialectical was Stoic dialectic?’, in Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality, eds. Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D.. Cambridge: 153179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. (1999) ‘Something and nothing: the Stoics on concepts and universals’, OSAPh 17: 145213.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1993) ‘Chrysippus on speaking truly and the liar’, in Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa and ihrer Vorläufer, eds. Döring, K. and Ebert, T.. Stuttgart: 85109.Google Scholar
Chaumartin, F.-R. (1985) Le De beneficiis de Sénèque, sa signification philosophique, politique et sociale. Paris.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1935) Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (1995) ‘La nascita della logica proposizionale’, Elenchos 16: 387400.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2009a) ‘Galen and Middle Platonism’, in Galen and the World of Knowledge, eds. Gill, Ch., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J.. Cambridge: 243260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2009b) ‘Le traité de Galien: sur la démonstration et sa postérité tardo-antique’, in Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism, eds. Chiaradonna, R. and Trabattoni, F.. Leiden: 4377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2013) ‘Universals in ancient medicine’, in Universals in Ancient Philosophy, eds. Chiaradonna, R. and Galluzzo, G.. Pisa: 381423.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. (2014) ‘Galen on what is persuasive (pithanon) and what approximates to truth’, in Philosophical Themes in Galen, eds. Adamson, P., Hansberger, R. and Wilberding, J.. London: 6188.Google Scholar
Chiesara, M. L. (2003) Storia dello scetticismo greco. Torino.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. (2012) An Essay of the Unity of Stoic Philosophy. Copenhagen. 1st edn. 1962.Google Scholar
Clayman, D. L. (2009) Timon of Phlius. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coda, E. (2015) ‘Un fragment du commentaire perdu au De Caelo d’ Alexandre d’ Aphrodise sur les différents sens des termes “engendré” et “inengendré” (Themistius, in De Caelo, p. 43.16–44.20 Heiberg)’, Studia graeco-arabica 5:1326.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (2004) ‘Arcesilaus: Socratic and sceptic’, in Knowledge, Nature and the Good. Princeton: 81103. Reprinted in (2006) Remembering Socrates, eds. L. Judson and V. Karasmanis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Couissin, P. (1983) ‘The Stoicism of the New Academy’, in The Skeptical Tradition, ed. Burnyeat, M.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: 3163. First published as Couissin, P. (1929) ‘Le Stoïcisme de la Nouvelle Académie’, Revue d’histoire de la philosophie 3: 241–276.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2010) ‘The Stoics on definition’, in Definition in Greek Philosophy, ed. Charles, D.. Oxford: 359423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croissant, J. (1984) ‘Autour de la quatrième formule d’implication dans Sextus Empiricus, Hyp. Pyrrh., II, 112’, RPhA 2: 73120.Google Scholar
Daube, D. (1956) Forms of Roman Legislation. Oxford.Google Scholar
De Harven, V. (2012) The Coherence of Stoic Ontology, doctoral thesis, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
De Lacy, P. (ed.) (1977–1984) Galen: De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, with trans. and comm. (3 vols.). Berlin.Google Scholar
De Meo, C. (1983) Lingue techniche del Latino. Bologna.Google Scholar
De Pater, W. A. (1968) ‘La fonction du lieu et de l’instrument dans les Topiques’, in Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics, ed. Owen, G. E. L.. Oxford: 164188.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1981) Pirrone: testimonianze. Naples.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. (1991) Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. (2002) ‘Neglected evidence for Diodorus Cronus’, CQ 52: 597600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Des Places, É. (ed.) (1977) Atticus: Fragments, with trans. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar
Détienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P. (1974) Les ruses de l’intelligence: la mètis des Grecs. Paris.Google Scholar
Diehl, E. (1936) Anthologia Lyrica Graeca 1, 2nd edn. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Dixsaut, M. (2001) Métamorphoses de la dialectique dans les dialogues de Platon. Paris.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1990) ‘Medioplatonismo e filosofi medioplatonici: una raccolta di studi’, Elenchos 11: 7993.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (ed.) (1994) Filodemo Storia de Filosofi La Stoá da Zenone a Panezio (PHerc. 1018). LeidenGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. (ed.) (1972) Die Megariker: Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1989) ‘Gab es eine Dialektische Schule?’, Phronesis 34: 293310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. (1998) ‘Sokrates, die Sokratiker und die von ihnen begründeten Traditionen’, in Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, Bd. 2/1. ed. H. Flashar: 139–364.
Döring, K. and Ebert, T., T. (eds.) (1993) Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (trans.) (1995) Aristote: les Réfutations sophistiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (2002) ‘Aristote et l’invention de la Dialectique’, in Le style de la pensée: recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig, eds. Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P.. Paris: 182220.Google Scholar
Dumont, J.-P. (2006) ‘Mos geometricus, mos physicus’, in Les Stoiciens et leur logique, ed. Brunschwig, J.. Paris: 121134. Reprinted Paris 2006: 389–404.Google Scholar
Düring, I. (1957) Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Dyck, E. F. (2002) ‘Topos and enthymeme’, Rhetorica 20: 105117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, H. (2009) Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, T. (1991) Dialektiker und frühe Stoiker bei Sextus Empiricus: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der Aussagenlogik. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, T. (2008) ‘In defence of the Dialectical school’, in Anthropine Sophia, eds. Alesse, F. et al. Naples: 275293.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. and Meillet, A. (1959) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: histoire des mots. 4th edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Essler, H. (2011) Glückselig und unsterblich: epikureische Theologie bei Cicero und Philodem. Basle.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (1996) ‘Il linguaggio e l’abaco (Arist., Soph. El. 1, 165a16–17)’, in Hodoi Dizesios/Le vie della ricerca. Studi in onore di Francesco Adorno, ed. Funghi, M. S.. Florence: 181191.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2003) ‘Sextus and external world scepticism’, OSAPh 23: 341385.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2008) ‘Does Socrates claim to know that he knows nothing?’, OSAPh 35: 4988.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, J. L. (ed.) (2012) The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (2000) ‘Teofrasto di Ereso: argomentazione retorica e sillogistica ipotetica’, Aevum 74: 6579.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M., Sharples, R. W. and Gutas, D. (eds.) (1993) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, with trans. (2 vols.). Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (1990) ‘Fatalism and future truth’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, 6: 195227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1974) Die stoische Logik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1981) ‘On Galen’s epistemology’, in Galen: Problems and Prospects, ed. Nutton, V.. Cambridge: 6586. Reprinted in Frede (1987a), 278–298.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1983a) ‘The title, unity, and authenticity of the Aristotelian Categories’, originally appeared as ‘Titel, Einheit und Echtheit der aristotelischen Kategorienschrift’, in Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum, eds. Moraux, P. and Wiesner, J.. Berlin: 120. Trans. W. Mann and reprinted in Frede (1987a): 11–28 and 363–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1983b) ‘Stoics and skeptics on clear and distinct impressions’, in The Skeptical Tradition, ed. Burnyeat, M.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: 6593. Reprinted in Frede (1987a): 151–176.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1984) ‘The skeptic’s two kinds of assent and the question of the possibility of knowledge’, in Philosophy in History, eds. Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. and Skinner, Q.. Cambridge: 255278. Reprinted in Frede (1987a): 201–222 and in Burnyeat and Frede (1997): 127–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1987a) Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987b) ‘Numenios’, ANRW 2.36.2 Berlin and New York: 10341075.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987c) ‘The original notion of cause’, in Frede (1987a): 125–150.
Frede, M. (1987d) ‘Stoics and skeptics on clear and distinct impressions’, in Frede (1987a): 151–176.
Frede, M. (1987e) ‘The skeptic’s beliefs’, in Frede (1987a): 179–200. Reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede (1997): 1–24.
Frede, M. (1987f) ‘Principles of Stoic grammar’, in Frede (1987a): 301–337.
Frede, M. (1988) ‘A medieval source of modern scepticism’, in Gedankenzeichen. Festschrift für Klaus Oehler, eds. Claussen, R. and Daube-Schackat, R.. Tübingen: 6570.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994a) ‘The Stoic notion of a lekton’, in Language: Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. III, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: 109128.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994b) ‘The Stoic notion of a grammatical case’, BICS 39: 1324.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2003) ‘Galen’s theology’, in Galien et la philosophie, eds. Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J.. Geneva: 73126 (‘Discussion’: 126–129).Google Scholar
Frisk, H. (1966) ‘Über den Gebrauch des Privativpräfixes’, in Kleine Schriften zur Indogermanistik und zur griechischen Wortkunde. Göteborg: 183229.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von (1931) ‘Megariker’, RE supp. vol.: 707–724.
Gabriel, G. Hülser, K. and Schlotter, S. (2009) ‘Zur Miete bei Frege: Rudolf Hirzel und die Rezeption der stoischen Logik und Semantik in Jena’, History and Philosophy of Logic 30: 369388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, R. N. (2002) ‘Cicero’s Partitiones Oratoriae and Topica: rhetorical philosophy and philosophical rhetoric’, in Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J. M.. Leiden, Boston and Cologne: 445480.Google Scholar
Gallo, I. (1980) Frammenti biografi da papiri. Rome.Google Scholar
Garcea, A. (2002) ‘L’interaction épistolaire entre dialogue in absentia et in praesentia chez Cicéron’, in Theory and Description in Latin Linguistics: Selected Papers from the XIth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics. Amsterdam, June 24–29, 2001, eds. Bolkestein, A. Machtelt et al. Amsterdam: 123138.Google Scholar
Gavoille, É. (2000) ‘La relation à l’absent dans les Lettres de Cicéron à Atticus’, in Epistulae antiquae: actes du Ier colloque ‘Le genre épistolaire antique et ses prolongements’ (Université François–Rabelais, Tours, 18–19 septembre 1998), eds. Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, É.. Leuven and Paris: 153176.Google Scholar
Gavoille, É. (2004) ‘Lettre et sermo’, in Epistulae antiquae. 3: actes du IIIe colloque international ‘L’épistolaire antique et ses prolongements européens’ (Université François–Rabelais, Tours, 25–27 septembre 2002), eds. Nadjo, L. and Gavoille, É.. Leuven and Paris: 3352.Google Scholar
Geach, P. (1972) ‘A history of the corruptions of logic: an inaugural lecture’, in Logic Matters. Oxford: 4461. 1st edn. Leeds 1968.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1983–1990) Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae. 4 vols. Naples.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (1993) ‘Die Philosophenschule der Megariker und Aristoteles’, in Döring and Ebert (1993), 155–165.
Gifford, E. H. (1903) Eusebii Evangelicae Praeparationis Libri XV ad codices denuo collatos recensuit, anglice nunc primum reddidit, notis et indicibus instruxit. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gigante, M. (1999) Kepos e Peripatos. Naples.Google Scholar
Giovacchini, J. (2003) ‘Le refus épicurien de la définition’, Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 15: 7189.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1995) ‘Probabile, veri simile and related terms’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 115143.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (1997) ‘Socrates in the Academic books and other Ciceronian works’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (1997): 58–88.CrossRef
Goldschmidt, V. (1972) ‘Ὑπάρχειν et ὑφιστάναι dans la philosophie stoïcienne’, REG, 85: 331344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görler, W. (1994) ‘Älterer Pyrrhonismus: Jüngere Akademie. Antiochos aus Askalon’, in Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie: Begründet von Friedrich Überweg, völlig neubearb. Ausgabe. Die Philosophie der Antike, Bd. 4: Die hellenistische Philosophie. Basle: 717989.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (2004) ‘Ein sprachlicher Zufall und seine Folgen: “Wahrscheinliches” bei Karneades und Cicero’, in Kleine Schriften zur hellenistisch-römischen Philosophie. Leiden: 6075.Google Scholar
Gorman, R. J. (2005) The Socratic Method in the Dialogues of Cicero. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. (1960) ‘Republic Book V: ta polla kala etc.᾽, Phronesis 5: 116128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1987) ‘Did Theophrastus write a Categories?’, Philologus 131: 245253.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. et al. (trans.) (1999) Diogène Laërce: vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres. Paris.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2000) La dialectique des stoïciens. Paris.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2013) ‘La postérité de la classification aristotélicienne des syllogismes aux IIe-IIIe s.: vers un Organon long?’, in Ad notitiam ignoti: l’Organon dans la translatio studiorum à l’époque d’Albert le Grand, ed. Brumberg-Chaumont, J.. Turnhout: 63114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (2014) ‘“Les causes sont causes de prédicats”: sur un aspect de la théorie stoïcienne de la cause’, in Aitia II, avec ou sans Aristote, le débat sur les causes à l’âge hellénistique et impérial, eds. Natali, C. and Viano, C.. Louvain-la-Neuve: 6593.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (trans.) (2016) Plotin: Traité 20: ‘Qu’est-ce que la dialectique?’, with comm. Paris.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. and Lemaire, J. (eds) (2016) Logique et dialectique dans l’Antiquité, Paris.Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (ed.) (1973) Die logischen Fragmente des Theophrast, with comm. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (1978) ‘The Stoic categories’, in Brunschwig (1978): 199–222.
Graeser, A. and Hadot, P. (1969) ‘Zur Vorgeschichte des Begriffs “Existenz”: ὑπάρχειν bei den Stoikern’, ABG 13: 115127.Google Scholar
Greene, W. C. (1938) Scholia Platonica. Haverford.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1995) ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero’s letters to his friends’, in Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 325346.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1997) ‘The composition of the Academica: motives and versions’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (1997): 1–35.CrossRef
Grimal, P. (1986) Cicéron. Paris.Google Scholar
Guérin, Ch. (2011) Persona: l’élaboration d’une notion rhétorique au Ier siècle av. J.-C. Volume II: Théorisation cicéronienne de la persona oratoire. Paris.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975) The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1970) ‘Tradition stoïcienne et idées politiques au temps des Gracques’, REL 48: 133179.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (2005) Arts libéraux et philosophie dans la pensée antique, Paris. 1st edn. 1984.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. et al. (1990) Simplicius: Commentaire sur les Catégories. Leiden.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1969) ‘Zur Vorgeschichte des Begriffs “Existenz”: ὑπάρχειν bei den Stoikern’, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, 13: 115127.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1979) ‘Les divisions des parties de la philosophie dans l’Antiquité’, MH 36: 201–33. Reprinted in Hadot (1998): 125–158.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1980a) ‘Sur divers sens du mot pragma dans la tradition philosophique grecque’, in Concepts et catégories dans la pensée antique, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: 309319. Reprinted in Hadot (1998): 61–76.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1980b) ‘Philosophie, dialectique, rhétorique dans l’Antiquité’, Studia Philosophica 39: 139166. Reprinted in Hadot (1998): 159–193.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1990) ‘La logique, partie ou instrument de la philosophie?’, in Simplicius, Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote, fasc. 1.1, ed. Hadot, I.. Leiden: 183188.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1991) ‘Philosophie, discours philosophique et divisions de la philosophie chez les stoïciens’, Revue internationale de philosophie 45: 205219.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1998) Études de philosophie ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius VII: On the Stoics’, ANRW II, 36–6, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 4076–4182.Google Scholar
Halbach, V. (2010) The Logic Manual. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) (1991) Galen: On the Therapeutic Method: Books 1 and 2, with trans. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1994) ‘Usage and abusage: Galen on language’, in Companions to Ancient Thought 3: Language, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: 166187.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1995) The Sceptics. London and New York.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1997) ‘Natural criteria and the transparency of judgement: Antiochus, Philo and Galen on epistemological justification’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (1997): 161–216.CrossRef
Hankinson, R. J. (2007) ‘Self-refutation and the sorites’, in Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, ed. Scott, D.. Oxford: 351373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) (2008) The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2009) ‘Galen on the limitations of knowledge’, in Galen and the World of Knowledge, eds. Gill, Ch., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J.. Cambridge: 206242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havrda, M. (2011) ‘Galenus Christianus? The doctrine of demonstration in Stromata VIII and the question of its source’, VChr 75: 343375.Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2015) ‘The purpose of Galen’s treatise On Demonstration’, Early Science and Medicine 20: 265287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havrda, M. (2017) The So-Called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria: Early Christian Reception of Greek Scientific Methodology, Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmig, Ch. (2012) Forms and Concepts: Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirzel, R. (1883) Untersuchungen zu Cicero’s philosophischen Schriften: III. Theil Academica Priora. Tusculanae Disputationes. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hodges, W. (2001) Logic: An Introduction to Elementary Logic, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. and Szantyr, A. (1972) Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich.Google Scholar
Hohmann, H. (2000) ‘Rhetoric and dialectic: some historical and legal perspectives’, Argumentation 14: 223234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, J. (2010) ‘Galen’s Aristotelian definitions’, in Definition in Greek Philosophy, ed. Charles, D.. Oxford: 450466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, P. M. (1989) ‘Cicero’s Topics and its Peripatetic sources’, in Cicero’s Knowledge of the Peripatos, eds. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Steinmetz, P.. New Brunswick and London: 6176.Google Scholar
Huby, P. M. and Gutas, D. (2007) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, Commentary Volume 2: Logic. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (ed.) (1987–1988) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. (4 vols.). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1993) ‘The Stoic division of philosophy’, Phronesis 38: 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (1998) ‘Aristotle’s logic: an instrument, not a part of philosophy’, in Aristotle: Logic, Language and Science, eds. Avgelis, N. and Peonidis, F., Thessaloniki: 3353.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2002) ‘Zeno’s arguments’, in Zeno of Citium and His Legacy: The Philosophy of Zeno, eds. Scaltsas, T. and Mason, A. S.. Larnaca,: 81112.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2012) ‘The notion of enargeia in Hellenistic philosophy’, in Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, eds. Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K.. Oxford: 6073.Google Scholar
Ildefonse, F. (1997) La naissance de la grammaire dans l’Antiquité grecque. Paris.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1999) ‘Rules and reasoning in Stoic ethics’, in Topics in Stoic Philosophy, ed. Ierodiakonou, K.. Oxford: 95127.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2007) Seneca, Selected Philosophical Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.) (1997) Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books. Leiden, New York and Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1986) Opinione e scienza: il dibattito tra Stoici e Accademici nel III e nel II secolo a. C. Naples.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (2007) ‘L’assenso nella filosofia di Clitomaco: un problema di linguaggio?’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC, eds. Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. N.. Naples: 225267.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (2009) La testimonianza di Sesto Empirico sull’Accademia scettica. Naples.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1989) Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1984) Aristotle on Comedy: Towards a Reconstruction of Poetics II. London.Google Scholar
Johnston, I. and Horsley, G. H. R. (eds.) (2011) Galen: Method of Medicine, with trans. and comm. (3 vols.). Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (2004) ‘The Stoics and the astronomical sciences’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, ed. Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 328344.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. (2010) ‘Truth and contradiction in Aristotle’s De interpretatione 6–9’, Phronesis 55: 2667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ju, A. E. (2009) ‘The Stoic ontology of geometrical limits’, Phronesis 54: 371389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalligas, P. (ed.) (2006) Πλωτίνου Ἐννεάς Πρώτη, with trans. and comm. Athens.Google Scholar
Kany-Turpin, J. (trans.) (2010) Cicéron. Académiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Kapp, E. (1942) Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kechagia, E. (2011) Plutarch against Colotes: A Lesson in History of Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, I. (1978) ‘Philosophy and science in Posidonius’, Antike und Abendland 24: 715.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. (1988) Posidonius II: The Commentary. (i) Testimonia and Fragments 1–149. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kneale, W. and Kneale, M. (1962) The Development of Logic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Knoepfler, D. (1991) La Vie de Ménédème d’Éretrie de Diogène Laërce: contribution à l’histoire et à la critique du texte des Vies des Philosophes. Basle.Google Scholar
Koetschet, P. (2015) ‘Galien, al-Râzî, et l’éternité du monde: les fragments du traité Sur la démonstration, IV, dans les Doutes sur Galien’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 25: 167198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzia-Panteli, P. (2000) ‘ΕΝΝΟΗΜΑΤΙΚΟΣ und ΟΥΣΙΩΔΗΣ ΛΟΓΟΣ als exegetisches Begriffspaar’, Philologus 144: 4561.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W. (1952) Herkunft und soziale Stellung der römischen Juristen. Weimar.Google Scholar
Kustas, G. L. (1973) Studies in Byzantine Rhetoric. Thessalonica.Google Scholar
Latte, K. (1968) ‘Augur und Templum in der varronischen Auguralformel’, in Kleine Schriften. Munich: 91105.Google Scholar
Lebrun, G. (1970) Kant et la fin de la métaphysique. Paris.Google Scholar
Lee, T.-S. (1984) Die Griechische Tradition der aristotelischen Syllogistik in der Spätantike. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroux, G. (1974) ‘Logique et dialectique chez Plotin: Ennéade 1.3(20)’, Phoenix 28: 180192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, C. (1980) ‘Media Academia (Part. Or., XL,139)’, AC 49: 260264.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1992) Cicero Academicus: recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (1993) ‘La conversation à Rome à la fin de la République: des pratiques sans théorie’, Rhetorica 11: 399420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy, C. (2000) ‘Cicéron critique de l’éloquence stoïcienne’, in Papers on Rhetoric, vol. III, ed. Montefusco, L. Calboli. Bologna: 127144.Google Scholar
Lévy, C. (2002) ‘Les Tusculanes et le dialogue cicéronien: exemple ou exception?’, VL 166: 2331.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1986) ‘The augural law’, ANRW II.16.3: 2146–2312.CrossRef
Lloyd, A. C. (1990) The Anatomy of Neoplatonism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996) ‘Theories and practices of demonstration in Galen’, in Rationality in Greek Thought, eds. Frede, M. and Striker, G.. Oxford: 255277.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1978) ‘Dialectic and the Stoic sage’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.. Berkeley: 101124. Reprinted in Long (1996): 85–106.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1986) ‘Diogenes Laertius: life of Arcesilaus’, Elenchos 7: 429249.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988a) ‘Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy’, CQ 38: 150171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988b) ‘Ptolemy on the Criterion: an epistemology for the practicing scientist’, in The Question of ‘Eclecticism’: Studies in Later Greek Philosophy, eds. Dillon, J. M. and Long, A. A.. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 176207.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995) ‘Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle’, in Cicero The Philosopher: Twelve Papers, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 3761.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996) Stoic Studies. New York.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2002) Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006a) ‘Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonist and satirist’, in From Epicurus to Epictetus. Oxford: 7095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006b) ‘Arcesilaus in his time and place’, in From Epicurus to Epictetus. Oxford: 96114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. and Sedley, D. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. (2 vols.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (2013) Conversation and Self-Sufficiency in Plato. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. (ed. and trans.) (1977) Philodemi De Rhetorica Libri Primus et Secundus. Naples.Google Scholar
Machuca, D. (2011) ‘Ancient Skepticism: the Skeptical Academy’, Philosophy Compass 6: 259266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maconi, H. (1988) ‘Nova non philosophandi philosophia: a review of Anna Maria Ioppolo, Opinione e scienza’, OSAPh 6: 231253.Google Scholar
Madden, E. H. (1952) ‘The enthymeme: crossroads of logic, rhetoric and metaphysics’, PhR 61: 368373.Google Scholar
Makin, S. (1996) ‘Megarian possibilities’, Philosophical Studies 83: 253276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1978) ‘Zeno of Citium: critical observations on a recent study’, Mnemosyne 31: 134178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1983) ‘Intuitionism and formalism: Zeno’s definition of geometry in a fragment of L. Calvenus Taurus’, Phronesis 28: 5974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1994) ‘Epicurus Peripateticus’, in Realtà e ragione, ed. Alberti, A.. Florence: 2947. Reprinted in Mansfeld and Runia (2010): 237–254.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. (2010) Aëtiana, vol. 3, Leiden.Google Scholar
Manuwald, A. (1973) Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs. Bonn.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.-I. (1969) ‘Les arts libéraux dans l’Antiquité classique’, in Arts libéraux et philosophie au Moyen-Âge: actes du Quatrième Congrès International de Philosophie Médiévale, 27 août-2 sept. 1967. Montréal and Paris: 533.Google Scholar
Mates, B. (1953) Stoic Logic. Berkeley.Google Scholar
McAdon, B. (2001) ‘Rhetoric is a counterpart to dialectic’, Ph&Rh 34: 113150.Google Scholar
McGinnis, J. and Reisman, D. C. (eds.) (2007) Classical Arabic Philosophy: An Anthology of Sources. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Meinwald, C. (2005) ‘Ignorance and opinion in Stoic epistemology’, Phronesis 50: 215231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, S. (1995) ‘Metaphysics, dialectic and the Categories’, RMM 3: 311337.Google Scholar
Michel, A. (2003) Rhétorique et philosophie chez Cicéron: essai sur les fondements philosophiques de l’art de persuader, 2nd edn. Leuven.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1993) ‘The Stoic analysis of the sorites’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 93: 231245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1998) ‘Theophrastus’ logic’, in Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources, eds. van Ophuijsen, J. M. and van Raalte, M.. New Brunswick: 3966.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1999a) ‘Paradoxes’, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds. Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 157176.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1999b) ‘The liar paradox and the Stoics’, in Topics in Stoic Philosophy, ed. Ierodiakonou, K.. Oxford: 5470.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1951) Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d’ Aristote. Louvain.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1968) ‘La joute dialectique d’après le huitième livre des Topiques’, in Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics, Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum, ed. Owen, G. E. L.. Oxford: 277311.Google Scholar
Moretti, G. (1995) Acutum dicendi genus: brevità, oscurità, sottigliezze e paradossi nelle tradizioni retoriche degli Stoici. Bologna.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2008a) ‘Language’, in The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Cambridge: 116156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morison, B. (2008b) ‘Logic’, in The Cambridge Companion to Galen, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Cambridge: 66115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morison, B. (2011) ‘The logical structure of the sceptic’s opposition’, OSAPh 40: 265296.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2013) ‘Aristotle on primary time in Physics 6’, OSAPh 35: 149193.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2014) ‘Sextus Empiricus’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/sextus-empiricus/.
Mueller, I. (1974) ‘Greek mathematics and Greek logic’, in Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations, ed. Corcoran, J.. Dordrecht: 3570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, I. (2004) ‘Remarks on physics and mathematical astronomy and optics in Epicurus, Sextus Empiricus and some Stoics’, Apeiron 37: 5787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, I. von (1895) ‘Über Galens Werk vom Wissenschaftlichen Beweis’, Abh. Bayer. Ak. d. Wiss. München 20: 403478.Google Scholar
Muller, R. (trans.) (1985). Les Mégariques. Fragments et témoignages, with comm. ParisGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. (1988) Introduction à la pensée des Mégariques. Paris and Brussels.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. (1911) ‘Die Stufen der Wahrscheinlichkeit bei Karneades’, RhM 66: 190198.Google Scholar
Müri, W. (1944) ‘Das Wort Dialektik bei Platon ‘, MH 1: 152168.Google Scholar
Neri, C. (2003) Erinna: testimonianze e frammenti. Bologna.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (1990) Die attische mittlere Komödie: Ihre Stellung in der antiken Literaturkritik und Literaturgeschichte. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netz, R. (1999) The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1868) ‘De Laertii Diogenis Fontibus’, RhM 23: 632653. Reprinted in Nietzsche Werke, ed. Colli–Montinari, vol. II.1, eds. F. Bornmann and M. Carpitella (1982). Berlin and New York: 75–167.Google Scholar
Nock, A. D. (1933) Conversion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nuchelmans, G. (1973) Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Bearers of Truth and Falsity. Amsterdam and London.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1992) ‘“What all men believe must be true”: common conceptions and consensio omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic philosophy’, OSAPh 10: 193231.Google Scholar
Obdrzalek, S. (2006) ‘Living in doubt: Carneades’ pithanon reconsidered’, OSAPh 31: 243279.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. (2013) ‘The lives and opinions of Socrates and Stilpo as defended by Plutarch against the insidious yet ignorant attacks of Colotes’, Aitia 3. Last accessed 15 December 2017 DOI 10.4000/aitia.677. =http://journals.openedition.org/aitia/677.CrossRef
Pagès, C. (2015) Qu’est-ce que la dialectique? Paris.Google Scholar
Pârvulescu, A. (1980) ‘Latin considerare et desiderare’, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 94: 159165.Google Scholar
Perin, C. (2005) ‘Stoic epistemology and the limits of externalism’, AncPhil 25: 383401.Google Scholar
Perin, C. (2010) ‘Scepticism and belief’, in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, ed. Bett, R.. Cambridge: 145164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perin, C. (2013) ‘Making sense of Arcesilaus’, OSAPh 45: 313340.Google Scholar
Petrucci, F. (2014) ‘Le témoignage du deuxième livre du “Commentaire au Timée” de Proclus sur la forme des arguments médio-platoniciens au sujet de la genèse du monde’, Revue des études grecques 127: 331–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pépin, J. (1972) ‘La vraie dialectique selon Clément d’Alexandrie’, in Epektasis: mélanges patristiques offerts au Cardinal Jean Daniélou, eds Fontaine, J. and Kannengiesser, C.. Paris: 375384.Google Scholar
Pietrobelli, A. (2013) ‘Galien agnostique: un texte caviardé par la tradition’, REG 126: 103135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlenz, P. (1965) ‘Cicero De officiis III’, in Kleine Schriften vol. I, ed. Dörrie, H.. Hildesheim: 253291.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. L. (1986) Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (1996) Die Aristotelische Topik: Ein Interpretationsmodell und seine Erprobung am Beispiel von Topik B. Munich.Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1951) Artium Scriptores (Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik). Vienna.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (trans.) (2002) Aristoteles: Rhetorik. (2 vols). Berlin.Google Scholar
Reid, J. S. (1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis Academica. London.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2000a) Das Buch E der Aristotelischen Topik: Untersuchungen zur Echtheitsfrage. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2000b) ‘Rhetoric in the Fourth Academy’, CQ 50: 531547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (ed.) (2003) Cicero’s Topica. Oxford.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2011) ‘Galen on unsayable properties’, OSAPh 40: 297317.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (2015) ‘On endoxa in Aristotle’s Topics’, RhM 158: 225246.Google Scholar
Repici, L. (1993) ‘The Stoics and the elenchos’, in Dialektiker und Stoiker, eds. Döring, K. and Ebert, T.. Stuttgart: 253269.Google Scholar
Riesenweber, T. (2009) ‘Eine stoische Tugenddefinition: zur Überlieferung von Cic. Inv. 2, 159–167’, RhM 152: 265291.Google Scholar
Riposati, B. (1947) Studi sui Topica di Cicerone. Milan.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2004) ‘Chrysippus on mathematical objects’, Ancient Philosophy 24: 169191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. (1953) Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, Oxford. 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. (1959) Physics of the Stoics. London.Google Scholar
Scade, P. (2013) ‘Plato and the Stoics on limits, parts and wholes’, in Plato and the Stoics, ed. Long, A. G.. Cambridge: 80105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäublin, C. (1995) Akademische Abhandlungen: Lucullus. Text und Übersetzung von Christoph Schäublin. Einleitung von Andreas Graeser und Christoph Schäublin. Anmerkungen von Andreas Bächli und Andreas Graeser. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (2003), ‘Aristotle on the fallacies of combination and division in Sophistici Elenchi 4’, History and Philosophy of Logic 24: 111129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, J.-P. (1994) ‘Cléarque de Soles’, in Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques 2, ed. Goulet, R.. Paris: 415420.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28: 3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1996) ‘Epilogismos: an appraisal’, in Rationality in Greek Thought, eds. Frede, M. and Striker, G.. Oxford: 221237.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999a) Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London and New York.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999b) ‘Academic epistemology’, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds. Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 323351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2012) ‘The neutralizing argument: Carneades, Antiochus, Cicero’, in The Philosophy of Antiochus, ed. Sedley, D. N.. Cambridge: 337349.Google Scholar
Schrenk, L. P. (1994) ‘Proof and discovery in Aristotle and the later Greek tradition: a prolegomenon to a study on analysis and synthesis’, in Aristotle in Late Antiquity, ed. Schrenk, L. P.. Washington, DC: 92108.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, E. (1953) Griechische Grammatik: Erster Band: Allgemeiner Teil, Lautlehre, Wortbildung, Flexion. Munich.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1973), ‘Epicurus, On Nature Book XXVIII’, Cronache Ercolanesi 3: 583.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1976) ‘Epicurus and the mathematicians of Cyzicus’, Cronache Ercolanesi 6: 2354.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1977) ‘Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic philosophyPCPS 23: 74120.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1982) ‘On signs’, in Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice, eds. Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 239272.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1983) ‘The motivation of Greek scepticism’, in The Skeptical Tradition, ed. Burnyeat, M.. Berkeley and Los Angeles: 929.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1988) ‘Epicurean anti-reductionism’, in Matter and Metaphysics, eds. Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M.. Naples: 297325.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1989) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world’, in Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, eds. Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 97119.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1992) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the atomist criteria of truth’, Elenchos 13: 1956.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1998) ‘Theophrastus and Epicurean physics’, in Theophrastus: Reappraising the Sources, eds. van Ophuisen, J.M. and van Raalte, M.. New Brunswick: 331354.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999) ‘Hellenistic physics and metaphysics’, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, eds. Algra, K., Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 355411.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2002) ‘Zeno’s definition of phantasia kataleptike’, in The Philosophy of Zeno, eds. Scaltsas, T. and Mason, A. S.. Larnaka: 135154.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2004) ‘Aristote et la signification’, Philosophie Antique 4: 525.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2005) ‘Verità futura e causalità nel De fato di Cicerone’, in La catena delle cause: determinismo e antideterminismo nel pensiero antico e in quello contemporaneo, eds. Natali, C. and Maso, S.. Amsterdam: 241254.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2007) Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley and London.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (ed.) (2012) The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. (2013) ‘Diodorus Cronus’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/diodorus-cronus/.
Sedley, D. (forthcoming) ‘Carneades’ theological arguments’, in Balla, C., Baziotopoulou, E., Kalligas, P. and Karasmanis, V. (eds.), Plato’s Academy: A History. Cambridge.
Shearin, W. (2015) The Language of Atoms. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (1993) ‘The truth evaluability of Stoic phantasiai: Adversus Mathematicos VII’, JHPh 31: 325347.Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (trans.) (1930) The Republic of Plato, with an English Translation. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Sichirollo, L. (1966) Διαλέγεσθαι. Dialektik von Homer bis Aristoteles. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Sim, M. (ed.) (1999) From Puzzles to Principles: Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic. Lanham.Google Scholar
Slomkowski, P. (1997) Aristotle’s Topics. Leiden, New York and Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (trans.) (1989) Aristotle, Prior Analytics. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (trans.) (1997) Aristotle, Topics: Books I and VIII, with comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. E. (2014) ‘The Socratic benevolence of Arcesilaus’ dialectic’, AncPhil 34: 341363.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1929) Die Entwicklung der aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik. Berlin.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2005) The Philosophy of the Commentators (200–600 AD): A Sourcebook, vol. I. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Speca, A. (2001) Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic. Leiden, Boston and Cologne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, E. (2008) ‘Sextus Empiricus, l’expérience sceptique et l’horizon de l’éthique’, Cahiers Philosophiques 115: 2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staden, H. von (1989) Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Stenzel, J. (1940) Plato’s Method of Dialectic, trans. Allan, D. J.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stopper, M. R. (1983) ‘Schizzi pirroniani’, Phronesis 28: 265297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, G. (1980) ‘Sceptical strategies’, in Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, eds. Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 5483.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1983) ‘The ten tropes of Aenesidemus’, in The Skeptical Tradition, ed. Burnyeat, M.. Berkeley: 95115. Reprinted in G. Striker (1996), Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: 116–134.Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1996) ‘Κριτήριον τῆς ἀληθείας’, in Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: 2276. (English rev. version of original 1974 German text).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Striker, G. (1997) ‘Academics fighting Academics’, in Inwood and Mansfeld (1997): 257–276.CrossRef
Striker, G. (2004) ‘Historical reflections on classical Pyrrhonism and neo-Pyrrhonism’, in Pyrrhonian Skepticism, ed. Sinott-Armstrong, W.. Oxford: 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, E. (1989) Dialectic and Its Place in the Development of Medieval Logic. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Svavarsson, S. H. (2014) ‘Sextus Empiricus on persuasiveness and equipollence’, in Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic, ed. Lee, Mi-Kyoung. New York: 356374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, S. C. R. (2002) ‘Bilingualism in Cicero? The evidence of code-switching’, in Bilingualism in Ancient Society: Language Contact and the Written Text, eds. Adams, J. N., Janse, M. and Swain, S. C. R.. Oxford and New York: 128167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. (2016) ‘Definition and ordinary language in Cicero, De finibus 2’, CPh 111: 5473.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (2000) ‘A trope by any other name: “polysemy”, ambiguity and significatio in Virgil’, HSPh 100: 381407.Google Scholar
Thorsrud, H. (2002) ‘Cicero on his Academic predecessors: the fallibilism of Arcesilaus and Carneades’, JHPh 40: 118.Google Scholar
Thorsrud, H. (2010) ‘Arcesilaus and Carneades’, in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, ed. Bett, R.. Cambridge: 5880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurneysen, R. (1906) ‘Senium und desiderium’, Archiv für Lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik 14: 179184.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. (1996a) Galen and Chrysippus on the Soul: Argument and Refutation in the De Placitis Books II–III. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tieleman, T. (1996b) ‘The argument of PHP Book II’, in Studi di storia della medicina antica e medievale in memoria di Paola Manuli, eds. Vegetti, M. and Gastaldi, S.. Florence: 4965.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (2007) ‘Philodemus and the Epicurean tradition’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC, eds. Ioppolo, A.-M. and Sedley, D.N.. Naples: 339397.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1858) Analecta Theophrastea, diss. University of Bonn. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Usener, H. (1887) Epicurea. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Valente, P. M. (1956) L’éthique stoïcienne chez Cicéron. Paris and Porto Alegre.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, Ph. J. (1997) ‘Galen’s use of the concept of “qualified experience” in his dietetic and pharmacological works’, in Galen on Pharmacology, ed. Debru, A.. Leiden: 3557. Reprinted in Van der Eijk (2005), 279–298.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, Ph. J. (2005) Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ophuijsen, J. M. (1994) ‘Where have the topics gone?’, in Peripatetic Rhetoric after Aristotle, eds. Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Mirhady, D. C.. New Brunswick and London: 131173.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1989) ‘Colotes and the Epicurean refutation of skepticism’, GRBS 30: 225267.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1994) ‘L’immagine del medico e lo statuto epistemologico della medicina in Galeno’, ANRW 2.37.2. Berlin and New York: 16721717.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (ed.) (2013) Galeno. Nuovi scritti autobiografici, with trans. and comm. Rome.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (2015) ‘Galeno, il “divinissimo” Platone e i platonici’, RSF 70: 447471.Google Scholar
Verde, F. (forthcoming) ‘Two concepts of sleep: Clearchus of Soli and Strato of Lampsacus’.
Vlastos, G. (1993) Socratic Studies, ed. Burnyeat, M., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, K. (2010) ‘Scepticism and action’, in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, ed. Bett, R.. Cambridge: 165180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, J. (2008) Lectures on Syntax: With Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic, (ed.) with notes and bibliography Langslow, D.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Waitz, T. (ed.) (1844‒6) Aristotelis Organon Graece, with comm. (2 vols.). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Walde, A. and Hofmann, J. B. (1938 3) Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. (3 vols.). Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Wallies, M. (ed.) (1891) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis in Aristotelis Topicorum libros octo commentaria. Berlin.Google Scholar
Walz, C. (1834) Rhetores Graeci VI. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. (1934) ‘Zur Traditionsgeschichte der aristotelischen Poetik’, Studi Italiani di filologia classica 11: 514.Google Scholar
Ward, J. K. (2008) On Homonymy: Dialectic and Science. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2006) ‘Psychic disharmony: Philoponus and Epicurus on Plato’s Phaedo’, OSAPh 30: 235259.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (ed.) (1955) Die Schule des Aristoteles, Heft 8: Eudemus von Rhodos. Basle.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (ed.) (1969) Die Schule des Aristoteles, Heft 3: Klearchos, 2nd edn. Basle.Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. (1983) ‘Der Peripatos bis zum Beginn der römischen Kaiserzeit’, in Die Philosophie der Antike vol. III, ed. Flashar, H.. Basle: 461599.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (ed.) (1992) Iambi et Elegi Graeci, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. W. A. (1996) Aristotle’s De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford.Google Scholar
White, M. J. (1982) ‘Zeno’s arrow, divisible infinitesimals and Chrysippus’, Phronesis 27: 239254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilberding, J. (ed.) (2006) Philoponus: Against Proclus’ On the Eternity of the World 12–18, with trans. and comm. London.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, K. E. (1988) ‘Carneades at Rome: a problem of sceptical rhetoric’, Ph&Rh 21: 131144.Google Scholar
Wynne, J. P. F. (2014) ‘Learned and wise: Cotta the sceptic in Cicero’s On the Nature of the Gods’, OSAPh 47: 245273.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1922) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, 2nd edn. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, R. (1996) The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar