Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:35:10.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - The Bone Marrow Biopsy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2020

Jon van der Walt
Affiliation:
St Thomas’ Hospital, London
Attilio Orazi
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
Daniel A. Arber
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Trepanning of the bone is one of the oldest known procedures carried out by man and the use of the modern trephine biopsy has a venerable history. Parapia has published an admirable summary of the history of the topic and this should be consulted for the excellent illustrations of historical instruments [1]. The history is briefly summarized here [1]. Trepanning of the skull is the oldest known surgical procedure in humans and evidence of this practice has been found in Europe, North Africa, South America, Asia and New Zealand. In Peru, where the procedure is likely to have been carried out to treat headache, mental illness and to relieve intracranial pressure, sharp knives of obsidian, stone and bronze were used for trephination. Celsus, the Roman physician, described a modiolus – an iron instrument with a serrated cylinder that was rotated over a central pin by means of a strap. The early interventions were therapeutic and the first diagnostic biopsy was undertaken in Pianese in Italy in 1903. In 1922, Morris and Falconer used a drill-like instrument to biopsy the tibia, producing similar specimens to modern biopsies and, in the same year, Seyfarth developed a puncture needle for open biopsy of the sternum, producing smears, touch preparations and blocks for sectioning. The modern era probably began in 1958 when McFarland and Dameshek described a technique for biopsy of the right posterior iliac crest using a Silverman needle, which had been described in 1938. Further improvements followed, with modified instruments described by Jamshidi in 1971 and an electric drill technique by Burkhardt in 1971. Recent developments are described later in the chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Parapia, LA. Trepanning or trephines: a history of bone marrow biopsy. B J Haematol. 2007;139:1419.Google Scholar
Bain, BJ. Bone marrow biopsy morbidity: review of 2003. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58:406–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bain, BJ. Bone marrow aspiration. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:657–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bain, BJ. Bone marrow trephine biopsy. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:737–42.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, SH, Campo, E, Harris, NL, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Revised 4th edn., Vol 2. Lyon: IARC Press; 2017.Google Scholar
Sever, C, Abbott, CL, de Baca, ME, et al. Bone marrow synoptic reporting for hematologic neoplasms. Guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140:932–49.Google Scholar
Arber, DA, Borowitz, MJ, Cessna, M, et al. Initial diagnostic workup of acute leukemia. Guideline from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society of Hematology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141:1342–93.Google Scholar
Ramsay, R, Pomplun, S, Wilkins, B. Tissue pathways for lymph node, spleen and bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens, November 2017, 3d edn. https://www.rcpath.org. Accessed December 11, 2017.Google Scholar
Orazi, A, Knowles, DM, Foucar, K, Weis, LM. (eds) Knowles’ Neoplastic Hematopathology. 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2014.Google Scholar
Lee, SH, Erber, WN, Porwit, A, Tomonaga, M, Peterson, LC; International Council for Standardization In Hematology. ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow specimens and reports. Int J Lab Hematol. 2008;30(5):349364.Google Scholar
Abla, O, Friedman, J, Doyle, J. Performing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy in children: Recommended guidelines. Paediatr Child Health. 2008;13:499501.Google Scholar
Maitia, A, Short, NJ, Verstovsek, S, et al. Quality and cost comparison of powered versus manual bone marrow biopsy devices in patients with myelofibrosis. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58:2508–10.Google Scholar
Islam, A. Bone marrow solid core biopsy needle: a critical assessment of the utility, benefits and limitations of the instruments employed in current day haematology and oncology. J Clin Pathol. Published Online First: 7 December 2017. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204865Google Scholar
Arber, DA, Johnson, RM, Rainer, PA, et al. The bone marrow agar section: a morphologic and immunohistochemical evaluation. Mod Pathol. 1993;6:592–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Brunning, RD, Bloomfield, CD, McKenna, RW, Peterson, LA. Bilateral trephine bone marrow biopsies in lymphoma and other neoplastic diseases. Ann Int Med. 1975;82:365–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Weiss, LM, Chang, KL, et al. Diagnostic utility of bilateral bone marrow examination: significance of morphologic and ancillary technique study in malignancy. Cancer. 2002;94:1522–31.Google Scholar
James, LP, Stass, SA, Schumacher, H.R. Value of imprint preparations of bone marrow biopsies in hematologic diagnosis. Cancer. 1980;46:173–7.Google Scholar
Torlakovic, EE, Naresh, K, Kremer, M, et al. Call for a European programme in external quality assurance for bone marrow immunohistochemistry; report of a European Bone Marrow Working Group pilot study. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:547–51.Google Scholar
Elliott, K, McQuaid, S, Salto-Tellez, M, Maxwell, P. Immunohistochemistry should undergo robust validation equivalent to that of molecular diagnostics. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68:766–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torlakovic, EE, Brynes, RK, Hyjek, E, et al. For the International Council for Standardization in Haematology. ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow immunohistochemistry. Int J Lab Hem. 2015;37:431–49.Google Scholar
Naresh, KN, Lampert, I, Hasserjian, R, et al. Optimal processing of bones marrow trephine biopsy: the Hammersmith Protocol. J Clin Pathol. 2006;59:903–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonds, LA, Barnes, P, Foucar, K, Sever, CE. Acetic acid–zinc-formalin: a safe alternative to B-5 fixative. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124:205–11.Google Scholar
Reineke, T, Jenni, B, Abdou, MT, et al. Ultrasonic decalcification offers new perspectives for rapid FISH, DNA, and RT-PCR analysis in bone marrow trephines. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30:892–6.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, I, Lenze, D, Hummel, M, Dietel, M, Joehrens, K. Bone marrow work-up: report of a pilot study. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2015;199:95105.Google Scholar
Fend, F, Tzankov, A, Bink, K, et al. Modern techniques for the diagnostic evaluation of the trephine bone marrow biopsy: methodological aspects and applications. Prog Histochem Cytochem. 2008;42:203–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neat, MJ, Moonim, MT, Dunn, RG, Geoghegan, H, Foot, NJ. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis of bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens: an additional tool in the diagnostic armoury. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66:54–7.Google Scholar
Krenacs, T, Bagdi, E, Stelkovics, E, Bereczki, L, Krenacs, L. How we process trephine biopsy specimens: epoxy resin embedded bone marrow biopsies. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58:897903.Google Scholar
De Laak–de Vries, I, Siebers, AG, Burgers, L, et al. How we do: optimizing bone marrow biopsy logistics for sign-out within 2 days. J Hematopathol. 2016;9:6771.Google Scholar
Brown, DC, Gatter, KC. The bone marrow trephine biopsy: a review of normal histology. Histopathology. 1993;22:411–22.Google Scholar
Bain, BJ, Clark, DM, Wilkins, BS. Bone Marrow Pathology, 4th edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.Google Scholar
Fong, TP, Okafor, LA, Schmitz, TH, Thomas, W, Westerman, MP. An evaluation of cellularity in various types of bone marrow specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1979;72:812–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruppo, RA, Lampkin, BC, Granger, S. Bone marrow cellularity determination: comparison of the biopsy, aspirate, and buffy coat. Blood. 1997; 49:2931.Google Scholar
Hartsock, RJ, Smith, EB, Petty, CS. Normal variations with aging of the amount of hematopoietic tissue in bone marrow from the anterior iliac crest: a study made from 177 cases of sudden death necropsy. Am J Clin Pathol. 1965;43:326–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gulati, GL, Ashton, JK, Hyun, BH. Structure and function of the bone marrow and hematopoiesis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1988;2:495511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friebert, SE, Shepardson, LB, Shurin, SB, Rosenthal, GE, Rosenthal, NS. Pediatric bone marrow cellularity: are we expecting too much? J Ped Hematol Oncol. 1998;20:439–43.Google Scholar
Sevilla, DW, Colovai, AI, Emmons, FN, Bhagat, G, Alobeid, B. Hematogones: a review and update. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010;51:1019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chantepie, SP, Cornet, E, Salaün, V, Reman, O. Hematogones: an overview. Leuk Res. 2013;37:1404–11.Google Scholar
Malcolm, AJ. Metabolic bone disease. Cur Diag Pathol. 2002;8:19-25.Google Scholar
Carvalho, C, Alves, CM, Frazão, JM. The role of bone biopsy for the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy: a short overview and future perspectives. J Nephrol. 2016;29:617–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, DA, Stuart-Smith, SE, Bain, BJ. How should stainable iron in bone marrow films be assessed? J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:1038–40.Google Scholar
Mufti, GJ, Bennett, JM, Goasguen, J, et al. Diagnosis and classification of myelodysplastic syndrome: International Working Group on Morphology of Myelodysplastic Syndrome (IWGM-MDS) consensus proposals for the definition and enumeration of myeloblasts and ring sideroblasts. Haematologica. 2008;93:1712–17.Google Scholar
Cazzola, M, Invernizzi, R. Ring sideroblasts and sideroblastic anemias. Haematologica. 2011;96:789–92.Google Scholar
Gale, E, Torrance, J, Bothwell, T. The quantitative estimation of total iron stores in human bone marrow. J Clin Invest. 1963; 42;1076–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orazi, A, O’Malley, DP, Arber, DA. Illustrated Pathology of the Bone Marrow. Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×