Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-fxdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T06:02:37.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Transforming Legal Theory in the Light of Practice: The Judicial Application of Social and Economic Rights to Private Orderings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2009

By
Helen Hershkoff
Edited by
Varun Gauri  and
Daniel M. Brinks
Varun Gauri
Affiliation:
The World Bank
Get access

Summary

More than a half century ago the Universal Declaration of Human Rights defined education and physical well-being as human rights to “be protected by the rule of law.” Although a significant number of national constitutions now include language that embraces a right to education, to health, or to both, disease and illiteracy remain pervasive throughout the world. Almost a billion individuals, a sixth of the international population, cannot read; similar numbers lack access to health care or to potable water. These deprivations cause physical harm, undermine a person's sense of autonomy, and subvert democratic possibilities. Against this dismal background, skeptics question not only the conceptual foundation of social and economic rights, but also their strategic value in fostering improvement for the disadvantaged and dispossessed.

The current project examines a specific aspect of this problem: the extent and efficacy of using national courts to enforce constitutionally based claims to health and to education services. Focusing on five nations – Brazil, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, and South Africa – the project offers an ambitious account of institutional practices based on cross-disciplinary, comparative case studies that combine quantitative with qualitative analysis. The countries under discussion have all codified social and economic rights in their national constitutions and in some places have enacted legislation to effectuate these provisions. The preceding chapters do not revisit the wisdom or legitimacy of extending constitutional protection to health or educational services.

Type
Chapter
Information
Courting Social Justice
Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World
 , pp. 268 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gauri, Varun 2005. Social rights and economics: Claims to health care and education in developing countries. In Alston, P. and Robinson, M. (eds.), Human rights and development: Towards mutual reinforcement (pp. 65–66). Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, Dinah 2007. Human rights, health and environmental protection. Hum. Rts. & Int'l Legal Discourse 1: 9, 56Google Scholar
Beatty, David M. 2004. The ultimate rule of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, H. J. and Alston, P. (eds.), International human rights in context: Law, politics, morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 239
Villalobos, V. Muñoz 2006. Economic, social and cultural rights: Girls' right to education. In Commission on Human Rights, Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right to education, E/CN.4/2006/45: 9
Sirkin, Susannah et al. 1999. The role of health professionals in protecting and promoting human rights: A paradigm for professional responsibility. In Danieli, Y., Stamatopoulou, E., and Dias, C. J. (eds.), The universal declaration of human rights: Fifty years and beyond (pp. 357–358). New York: BaywoodGoogle Scholar
Pejan, Ramin, 2004. The right to water: The road to justiciability. Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 36: 1181Google Scholar
,World Health Organization 2003. The right to water. Geneva: World Health Organization, p. 7)Google Scholar
Yamin, Alicia Ely 2003. Not just a tragedy: Access to medications as a right under international law. B.U. Int'l L. J. 21: 325Google ScholarPubMed
Fabre, Cécile 2000. Social rights under the constitution: Government and the decent life. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, K. D. 2003. The case for social rights. In Campbell, T., Goldsworthy, J., and Stone, A. (eds.), Protecting human rights: Instruments and institutions (pp. 323, 326). Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Dwight G. 2003. Institutional monitoring of social and economic rights: A South African case study and a new research agenda. S. Afr. J. on Hum. Rts. 19: 189Google Scholar
Singh, Parmanand 2006. Social rights and good governance: The Indian perspective. In Kumar, C. Raj. and Srivastava, D. K. (eds.), Human rights and development: Law, policy and governance (p. 437). Hong Kong: LexisNexisGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran, 2004. Towards juristocracy: The origins and consequences of the new constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (p. 13, associating constitutional review with the decline in “progressive concepts of distributive justice”)Google Scholar
Goldstein, Leslie Friedman 2004. From democracy to juristocracy. Law & Society Rev. 38: 611, 626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felice, William F. 2003. The global new deal: Economic and social human rights in world politics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield (pp. 7, 51–53, defining economic and social rights)Google Scholar
Sager, Lawrence G. 2001. Thin constitutions and the good society. Fordham L. Rev. 69: 1989–90Google Scholar
Smillie, John 2006. Who wants juristocracy?Otago L. Rev. 11: 183, 183–184Google Scholar
Pieterse, Marius 2004. Coming to terms with judicial enforcement of socio-economic rights. S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 20: 383, 384Google Scholar
Mann, Jonathan M. et al. 1999. Health and human rights. In Mann, Jonathan M. et al. (eds.), Health and human rights: A reader (p. 10). New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Balkin, J. M. 1995. Populism and progressivism as constitutional categories. Yale L. J. 104: 1935, 1968–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, Kristen 2007. The role of courts in enforcing economic and social rights. Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 39: 449, 456Google Scholar
Ssenyonjo, Manisuli 2007. Non-state actors and economic, social, and cultural rights. In Baderin, M. A. and McCorquodale, R. (eds.), Economic, social and cultural rights in action. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Clapham, Andrew 1995. The privatisation of human rights. Eur. Hum. Rts. L. Rev.: 20Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen 2003–2004. The “horizontal effect” of constitutional rights. Mich. L. Rev. 102: 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, Georg 2005. European and U.S. constitutionalism: Comparing essential elements. In Nolte, Georg (ed.), European and US constitutionalism (pp. 3–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cafaggi, Fabrizio and Watt, Horatia Muir 2006. The making of European private law: Regulation and governance design. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=946284 (accessed May 12, 2008)
Cafaggi, Fabrizio 2006. Rethinking private regulation in the European regulatory space. In Cafaggi, F. (ed.), Reframing self-regulation in European private law (pp. 3–76). Leiden, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Barry 2005. The politics of judicial review. Tex. L. Rev. 4: 257, 336Google Scholar
Pompe, Sebastian 2005. Access to court decisions and the problem of lawmaking. The Indonesian Supreme Court: A study of institutional collapse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program Publications, pp. 435–455Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly 2007. The paradox of extralegal activism: Critical legal consciousness and transformative politics. Harv. L. Rev. 120: 937, 939Google Scholar
Kauper, Paul 1962. Civil liberties and the constitution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, p. 129Google Scholar
McHarg, Aileen 2006. The constitutional dimension of self-regulation. In Cafaggi, Reframing self-regulation in European private law, 80
Perry, Michael J. 2003. Protecting human rights in a democracy: What role for the courts?Wake Forest L. Rev. 38: 635Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1977. Taking rights seriously (pp. 90–94 and 364–368). London: DuckworthGoogle Scholar
Kay, Richard S. 1993. The state action doctrine, the public–private distinction, and the independence of constitutional law. Const. Commentary 10: 329, 349–358Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. 1985. Constitutional choices. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, p. 246Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2001. Designing democracy: What constitutions do. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 222Google Scholar
Fried, Charles 1978. Right and wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, p. 110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, John C. P. 2005. The constitutional status of tort law: Due process and the right to a law for the redress of wrongs. Yale L. J. 115: 524Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2005. Why does the American Constitution lack social and economic guarantees?Syracuse L. Rev. 56: 1, 6Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen 1999. Positive rights and state constitutions: The limits of federal rationality review. Harv. L. Rev. 112: 1131, 1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Herman 1995. Do economic and social rights belong in a constitution?Am. U. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 10: 1233, 1235Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew 1993. Human rights in the private sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 150–162Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1948. Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 22Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1973. Law, legislation and liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 56Google Scholar
Addo, Michael K. 2005. Human rights perspectives of corporate groups. Conn. L. Rev. 37: 667, 675Google Scholar
Freeman, Jody, 2000. The private role in public governance. N.Y.U. L. Rev. 75: 543, 551Google Scholar
Braucher, Jean 2007. New frontiers in private ordering – An introduction. Ariz. L. Rev. 49: 577, 577Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff 2000. Cyberspace and the state action debate: The cultural value of applying constitutional norms to “private” regulation. U. Colo. L. Rev. 71: 1263, 1279Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry 1993. The public/private distinction and constitutional limits on private power. Const. Comment. 10: 361, 365Google Scholar
Loffredo, Stephen 1993. Poverty, democracy and constitutional law. U. Pa. L. Rev. 141: 1277, 1361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, Viktor J. 2005. Market and state: The perspective of constitutional political economy. J. of Institutional Economics 1: 23–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggart, Michael, 1997. The province of administrative law. In Taggart, M. (ed.), The province of administrative law (pp. 1–21). Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jerre S. 1963. The twilight of state action. Texas L. Rev. 41: 347Google Scholar
Vanberg, Viktor J. 1999. Markets and regulation: On the contrast between free-market liberalism and constitutional liberalism. Constitutional Political Economy 10: 219, 220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brest, Paul 1982. State action and liberal theory: A casenote on Flagg Brothers v. Brooks. U. Pa. L. Rev. 130: 1296, 1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel 1985. Contract and justice: The relation between classical contract law and social contract theory. Iowa L. Rev. 70: 769, 772Google Scholar
Bittker, Boris I. and Kaufman, Kenneth M. 1972. Taxes and civil rights: “Constitutionalizing” the Internal Revenue Code. Yale L. J. 82: 51, 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Paul 1988. The meaning of privatization. Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 6: 6, available at http://www.princeton.edu/~starr/meaning.html (accessed Jan. 10, 2008)Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly 2004. The renew deal: The fall of regulation and the rise of governance in contemporary legal thought. Minn. L. Rev. 89: 342, 344Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin 2001. Administrative law unbounded: Reflections on government and governance. Indiana J. of Global Leg. Studies 8: 369Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol, 2005. Deconstructing government? In Ginsburg, T. and Kagan, R. A. (eds.), Institutions & public law: Comparative approaches (p. 141). New York: Pete LangGoogle Scholar
Aman, Alfred C. 2004. The democracy deficit: Taming globalization through law reform. New York: New York University Press, p. 93Google Scholar
Ellman, Matthew 2006. Does privatising public service provision reduce accountability? Available at http://ssrn. com/abstract=1002830 (accessed Jan. 4, 2008)
Freeman, Jody 2000. The private role in public governance. N.Y.U. L. Rev. 75: 543, 591Google Scholar
Hills, Roderick M. 2003. The constitutional rights of private governments. N.Y.U. L. Rev. 78: 144, 149–150Google Scholar
Dasar, Undang-Undang 1945 [Constitution] Art. 28 H (Indonesia), in Constitutions of the countries of the world, available at http://www.oceanalaw.com/gateway (accessed Dec. 7, 2007)
Sen, Amartya 2006. Human rights and the limits of law. Cardozo L. Rev. 27: 2913, 2915Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas 2007. Montréal statement on the human right to essential medicines. Cambridge Q. of Healthcare Ethics 16: 97–108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tushnet, Mark 2003. The issue of state action/horizontal effect in comparative constitutional law. Int'l J. Const. L. 1: 79Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark, 2002. Comparative constitutionalism: State action, social welfare rights, and the judicial role: Some comparative observations. Chi. J. Int'l L. 3: 435Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen 2006. The New Jersey Constitution: Positive rights, common law entitlements, and state action. Alb. L. Rev. 69: 553Google Scholar
Alexy, Robert 2002. A theory of constitutional rights, trans. Rivers, J.. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 355Google Scholar
Friedman, Cf. Barry 2001. The counter-majoritarian problem and the pathology of constitutional scholarship. Nw. U. L. Rev. 95: 933, 953Google Scholar
Friedmann &, DanielBarak-Erez, Daphne (eds.). 2001. Human rights in private law. Oxford: Hart, especially Aharon Barak, Constitutional human rights and private law
Fagan, Anton 2001. Determining the stakes: Binding and non-binding bills of rights. In Friedman, and Barak-Erez, (eds.), Human rights in private law (p. 73), Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
Sajó, András 2002. Socioeconomic rights and the international economic order. N.Y.U. J. of International L. & Politics 35: 221, 232Google Scholar
Beiter, Klaus Dieter 2006. The protection of the right to education by international law. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, p. 569Google Scholar
Starck, Christian, 2001. Human rights and private law in German constitutional development and in the jurisdiction of the Federal Constitutional Court. In Friedmann, , and Barak-Erez, (eds.), Human rights in private law (p. 97). Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
Benson, Peter 2001. Equality of opportunity and private law. In Friedman, and Barak-Erez, (eds.), Human rights in private law (p. 205). Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
Barak-Erez, Daphne 2001. Constitutional human rights and private laws. In Friedmann, and Barak-Erez, (eds.), Human rights in private law (p. 21). Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, Roger 2001. Freedom of contract, human rights and human dignity. In Friedmann, and Barak-Erez, (eds.), Human rights in private law (pp. 181–183). Oxford: HartGoogle Scholar
Wade, William 2000. Horizons of horizontality. L.Quarterly Rev. 116: 217Google Scholar
Krishnaswamy, Sudhir, 2007. Horizontal application of fundamental rights and state action in India. In &, Raj KumarChockalingam, K. (eds.), Human rights, justice, and constitutional empowerment (p. 65). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Mark D. 2007. Was Shelley v. Kraemer incorrectly decided? Some new answers. Cal. L. Rev. 95: 451, 469Google Scholar
Sager, Lawrence G. 2004. The why of constitutional essentials. Fordham L. Rev. 72: 1425–1426Google Scholar
Al'Afghani, Mohamad Mova 2007. Safeguarding water contracts in Indonesia. Law Environment and Development Journal 3(2): 152Google Scholar
Al'Afghani, Mohamad Mova 2006. Constitutional Court's review and the future of water law in Indonesia. Law Environment and Development Journal 2(1): 1Google Scholar
Setalvad, Atul M. 2000. The Supreme Court on human rights and social justice: Changing perspectives. In Kirpal, B. N., Desai, A. H., Subramanium, G., Dhvan, R., and Ramachandran, R. (eds.), Supreme but not infallible: Essays in honour of the Supreme Court of India (pp. 232–255). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro 2006. Introduction: The third moment in law and development theory and the emergence of a new critical practice. In Trubek, D. M. and Santos, A. (eds.), The new law and economic development: A critical appraisal (p. 14). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieterse, Marius 2006. Resuscitating socio-economic rights: Constitutional entitlements to health care services. S. Afr. J. Hum. Rts. 22: 495Google Scholar
Singer, William Joseph 1996. No right to exclude: Public accommodations and private property. Nw. U. L. Rev. 90: 1283, 1466–1467Google Scholar
Murphy, Cf. Liam & Nagel, Thomas 2002. The myth of ownership: Taxes and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Craig 1999. Reaching beyond (without abandoning) the category of “economic, social and cultural rights.”Hum. Rts. Q. 21: 633, 646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffey, Peter 2004. Hohfeld's power-liability/right-duty distinction in the law of restitution. Can. J. L. & Juris 17: 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Walter Wheeler 1919. Hohfeld's contributions to the science of law. Yale L. J. 28: 721, 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. & Sabel, Charles F. 1998. A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Colum. L. Rev. 98: 267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , 2000, Politics, trans. Jowett, Benjamin. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, p. 68Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark 2004. Social welfare rights and the forms of judicial review. Tex. L. Rev. 82: 1895Google Scholar
Christiansen, Eric C. 2007. Adjudicating non-justiciable rights: Socio-economic rights and the South African Constitutional Court. Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 38: 321, 341Google Scholar
Sachs, Albie 2000. Social and economic rights: Can they be made justiciable?SMU 3: 1388–1389Google Scholar
Ilchman, and Uphoff, , 1998. The political economy of change, p. 27. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
Cane, Peter 2005. Anatomy of private law theory: A 25th anniversary essay. Oxford J. Legal Stud. 25: 203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T. 1980. Contract law and distributive justice. Yale L. J. 89: 472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kordana, Kevin A. and Tabachnick, David H. 2005. Rawls and contract law. Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 73: 598, 652Google Scholar
Goldstone, Richard J. 2006. South African perspective on social and economic rights. Hum. Rts. 13(2), Brief 4Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C. and Fleming, James E. 2005–2006. Constitutionalism, judicial review, and progressive change. Tex. L. Rev. 84: 433–438Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1975. Whigs and hunters: The origin of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon Books)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×