Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T20:23:42.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2021

Renaud Gagné
Renaud Gagné
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Cosmography and the Idea of Hyperborea in Ancient Greece
A Philology of Worlds
 , pp. 419 - 520
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalders, G. J. D. 1978. “Die Meropes des Theopomp”, Historia 27: 317–327.Google Scholar
Aalto, P., Pekkanen, T. 1975–1980. Latin Sources on North-Eastern Eurasia, 2 vol. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Abate, M. T. 2013. “The Reorientation of Roger Bacon: Muslims, Mongols, and the Man Who Knew Everything”, in Classen, A., ed., East Meets West in the Middle Ages and Early Modern Times Transcultural Experiences in the Premodern World. Berlin, 523–574.Google Scholar
Abramson, A. 2014. Holbraad, M., ed., Framing Cosmologies: The Anthropology of Worlds. Manchester.Google Scholar
Abramson, A. 2018. “Cosmology”, in Callan, H., ed., International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. London.Google Scholar
Abulafia, D., Berend, N., ed. 2002. Medieval Frontiers: Concepts and Practices. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Adameşteanu, D. 1979. “Διὸς ἀγορά a Metaponto”, PP 34: 296–312.Google Scholar
Agard, W. A. 1966. “Boreas at Athens”, CJ 61: 241–246.Google Scholar
Agosti, G. 2017. “Présence d’Homère dans les épigrammes épigraphiques tardives”, in Durbec, Y., Trabjer, F., ed., Traditions épiques et poésie épigrammatique. Actes du colloque des 7, 8 et 9 novembre 2012 à Aix-en-Provence. Leuven, 225–244.Google Scholar
Aguirre, M., Buxton, R. G. A. 2020. Cyclops: The Myth and its Cultural History. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahl, F. M. 1982. “Amber, Avallon, and Apollo’s Singing Swan”, AJP 103: 373–411.Google Scholar
Ahrens, H. L. 1839–1843. De graecae linguae dialectis, 2 vol. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ahuvia, M., Kocar, A., ed. 2018a. Placing Ancient Texts: The Ritual and Rhetorical Use of Space. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Ahuvia, M., Kocar, A., ed. 2018b. “Introduction”, in Ahuvia, M., A. Kocar, A., ed., Placing Ancient Texts: The Ritual and Rhetorical Use of Space. Tübingen, 1–12.Google Scholar
Albaladejo Vivero, M. 2005. “Los extremos de Europa en la obra de Píndaro y de Heródoto”, Klio 87: 315–328.Google Scholar
Albis, R. V. 1996. Poet and Audience in the Argonautica of Apollonius. Lanham.Google Scholar
Albrile, E. 2018. Iperborea: il mito polare tra simbologia, estasi e immaginazione. San Marino.Google Scholar
Alden, M. J. 1982. “Pythian X and Pindar’s Ineptitude”, Liverpool Classical Monthly 7: 129–134.Google Scholar
Alemany i Vilamajó, A. 1999. “Els ‘Cants arimaspeus’ d’Arísteas de Proconnès i la caiguda deis Zhou Occidentals”, Faventia 21: 45–55.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. S. 1997. “Jerusalem as the Omphalos of the World: On the History of a Geographical Concept”, Judaism 46: 147–159.Google Scholar
Alexandrescu, P., ed. 2005. Histria. Les résultats des fouilles, VII. La zone sacrée d’époque grecque (Fouilles 1915–1989). Bucharest.Google Scholar
Algra, K. 1994. Concepts of Space in Greek Thought. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almagor, E. 2014. “Dionysius of Miletos”, Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Almqvist, O. 2020. “Hesiod’s Theogony and Analogist Cosmogonies”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 10: 183–194.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. 1998. Cantare glorie di eroi. Turin.Google Scholar
Alt, K. 2008. “Opferkult und Vegetarismus in der Auffassung griechischer Philosophen: (4. Jahrh. v. Chr. bis 4. Jahrh. n. Chr.)”, Hyperboreus 14: 87–116.Google Scholar
Altherr-Charon, A., Bérard, C. 1980. “Érétrie. L’organisation de l’espace et la formation d’une cité grecque”, in Schnapp, A., ed., L’archéologie aujourd’hui. Paris, 229–249.Google Scholar
Alves Gaspar, J., Leitão, H. 2013. “Squaring the Circle: How Mercator Constructed His Projection in 1569”, Imago Mundi 66: 1–24.Google Scholar
Aly, W. 1921. Volksmärchen, Sage und Novelle bei Herodot und seine Zeitgenossen. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Amandry, P. 1939. “Convention religieuse conclue entre Delphes et Skiathos”, BCH 63: 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amandry, P. 1950. La mantique apollinienne à Delphes. Paris.Google Scholar
Amandry, P. 1978. “Consécration d’armes galates à Delphes”, BCH 102: 571–586.Google Scholar
Amandry, P. 1992. “Où était l’omphalos?”, in Bommelaer, J-F, ed., Delphes, centenaire de la ‘grande fouille’ réalisée par l’École française d’Athènes (1892–1903). Leiden, 177–205.Google Scholar
Amati, M. F. 2009–2010. “Meton’s Star-City: Geometry and utopia in Aristophanes’ Birds”, CJ 105: 213–227.Google Scholar
Ambaglio, D. 1980. L’opera storiografica di Ellanico di Lesbo. Pisa.Google Scholar
Ambaglio, D. 2007. “Quale razionalismo negli scrittori greci pretucididei?”, Athenaeum 95: 685–691.Google Scholar
Ambühl, A. 1995. “Callimachus and the Arcadian Asses: The Aitia prologue and a lemma in the London Scholion”, ZPE 105: 209–213.Google Scholar
Amiotti, G. 1987. “Le colonne d’Ercole e i limiti dell’ecumene”, in Sordi, G., ed., Il confine nel mondo classico. Milan, 13–20.Google Scholar
Amiotti, G. 1988. “Le isole fortunate: mito, utopia, realtà geografica”, in Sordi, G., ed., Geografia e storiografia nel mondo classico. Milan, 166–177.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. R. 1932. Alexander’s Gate, Gog and Magog, and the Inclosed Nations. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. 2012. “The Alexander Romance and the Pattern of Hero-Legend”, in Stoneman, R., Erickson, K., Netton, I., ed., The Alexander Romance in Persia and the East. Eelde, 81–102.Google Scholar
Andolfi, I. 2019. Acusilaus of Argos’ Rhapsody in Prose: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar
Andrew, G. 2007. Ancient Greek Cosmogony. London.Google Scholar
Angeli, B. P. 1991. “La hybris degli asini e il riso di Apollo in Pindaro, Pyth. 10, 36”, Studi di filologia classica in onore di Giusto Monaco, vol. 1. Palermo, 155–159.Google Scholar
de Angelis, F. 2001. “Archaeology in Sicily 1996–2000”, Archaeological Reports 47: 145–2001.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2006a. “Note on aphidruma. 1: Statues and Their Function”, CQ 56: 641–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2006b. “Note on aphidruma. 2: Strabo on the Transfer of Cults”, CQ 56: 643–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, L. 1997. I Greci oltre Gibilterra. Rappresentazioni mitiche dell’estremo Occidente e navigazioni commerciali nello spazio atlantico fra VIII e IV secolo a.C. Rome.Google Scholar
Antonetti, C. 1994. “Strabone e il popolamento originario dell’Etolia”, in Biraschi, A. M., ed., Strabone e la Grecia. Naples, 119–136.Google Scholar
Anttila, T. 2014. The power of Antiquity: The Hyperborean Research Tradition in Early Modern Swedish Research on National Antiquity, diss. Oulu.Google Scholar
Apianus, P. 1530. Cosmographicus Liber Petri Apiani mathematici, iam denuo integritatem restitutus per Gemmam Phisium. Antwerp.Google Scholar
Apps, A. 2014. “Source Citation and Authority in Solinus”, in Brodersen, K., ed., Solinus: New Studies. Heidelberg, 32–42.Google Scholar
Arena, A. 1979. “Considerazioni sul mito di Callisto”, Acme 32: 5–26.Google Scholar
Armayor, O. K. 1986. “Did Herodotus Ever Go to the Black Sea?”, HSCP 82: 45–62.Google Scholar
Armayor, O. K. 1987. “Hecataeus’ Humor and Irony in Herodotus’ Narrative of Egypt”, AW 16: 11–18.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P. 2011. “La mer dans la construction grecque de l’image du monde”, in J. Santos Yanguas, B. Díaz Ariño, ed., Los Griegos y el mar. Nice, 129–153.Google Scholar
Arnould, D. 2001. “Hérodote philologue: le mot juste”, Connaissance Hellénique 87: 68–74.Google Scholar
Arnould, D. 2007. “À l’ombre des oliviers d’Héraclès: Pindare, Olympique III”, in David, S., Geny, É, ed., Troïka: parcours antiques: mélanges offerts à Michel Woronoff. Besançon, 133–139.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. 1981. “Contributi di esegesi pindarica e bacchilidea”, Studi di letteratura greca. Pisa, 77–96.Google Scholar
Ash, R. 2007. “Victim and Voyeur: Rome as a Character in Tacitus’ Histories 3”, in Larmour, D. H. J., Spencer, D., ed., The Sites of Rome: Time, Space, Memory. Oxford, 211–237.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. 1990. “Herodotus on Thracian Society and History”, in Nenci, G., ed., Hérodote et les peuples non-grecs. Geneva-Vandoeuvres, 131–163.Google Scholar
Asheri, D. 2007. “Book III”, in Murray, O., Moreno, A., ed., A Commentary on Herodotus Books I–IV. Oxford, 381–542.Google Scholar
Asper, M. 1997. Onomata allotria. Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. 2010. “Canon and Archive”, in Erll, A., Nünning, A., ed., A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin, 97–110.Google Scholar
Assmann, A. 2011 [1999]. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. 1977. “Die Verborgenheit des Mythus im Alten Ägypten”, Göttinger Miszellen 25: 7–43.Google Scholar
Asso, P. 2010. A Commentary on Lucan, De bello civili IV: Introduction, Edition, and Translation. Berlin.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2010. “Giving Wings to the Aeginetan Sculptures: The Panhellenic Aspirations of Pindar’s Eighth Olympian”, in Fearn, D., ed., Aegina: Contexts for Choral Lyric Poetry. Myth, History, and Identity in the Fifth Century BC. Oxford, 257–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2011. “Song, Politics, and Cultural Memory: Pindar’s Pythian 7 and the Alcmaeonid Temple of Apollo”, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E., ed., Archaic and Classical Choral Song. Berlin, 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassaki, L. 2016. “The Symposion as Theme and Performance Context in Pindar’s Epinicians”, in Cazzato, V., Obbink, D., Prodi, E. E., ed., The Cup of Song. Studies on Poetry and the Symposion. Cambridge, 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassakis, A. N. 2001. “Shamanism and Amber in Greece: The Northern Connection”, in Pentikäinen, J., Saressalo, L., C. Taksami, C., ed., Shamanhood, Symbolism and Epic. Budapest, 207–220.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D., Sibley, D., Jackson, P., ed. 2005. Cultural Geography: A Critical Dictionary of Key Concepts. London.Google Scholar
Auberson, P. 1974. “La reconstitution du Daphnéphoréion d’Erétrie”, Antike Kunst 17: 60–68.Google Scholar
Auger, D., Delattre, C., eds. 2010. Mythe et fiction. Paris.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1966. Strabon et la science de son temps. Paris.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1987. “The Foundation of Theoretical Cartography in Archaic and Classical Greece”, in Harley, J. B., Woodward, D., ed., The History of Cartography I: Cartography in Prehistoric, Ancient, and Medieval Europe and the Mediterranean. Chicago, 130–160.Google Scholar
Aujac, G. 1988. “L’île de Thulé, mythe ou réalité (Étude de géographie grecque)”, Athenaeum 66: 329–343.Google Scholar
Aupetitgendre-Siffert, S. 1999. “Pline l’Ancien et la géographie des confins”, Euphrosyne 27: 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avagianou, A. 1998. “Ephorus on the Founding of Delphi’s Oracle”, GRBS 39: 121–136.Google Scholar
Avdagic, M. 2018. “The North in Antiquity: Between Maps and Myths”, in Jørgensen, D., Langum, V., ed., Visions of North in Premodern Europe. Turnhout, 59–80.Google Scholar
Avram, A., Hind, J., Tsetskhladze, G. 2004. “The Black Sea Area”, in Hansen, M. H., Nielsen, T. H., ed., An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis. Oxford, 924–973.Google Scholar
Avram, A. 2009. “Épigraphie et histoire religieuse. Le culte de Léto dans les cités de la Mer Noire”, in Martínez Fernández, Á, ed., Estudios de Epigrafía Griega. La Laguna, 305–314.Google Scholar
Azarnouche, S. 2018. “Le clergé dans l’Iran ancien”, in Coulon, L., Gatier, P-L, ed., Le clergé dans les sociétés antiques. Statut et recrutement. Paris, 113–138.Google Scholar
Babut, D. 1993. “Stoïciens et Stoïcisme dans les dialogues Pythiques de Plutarque”, ICS 18: 203–227.Google Scholar
Babut, D. 1994. “Du scepticisme au dépassement de la raison: philosophie et foi religieuse chez Plutarque”, Parerga. Choix d’articles de Daniel Babut (1974–1994). Lyon, 549–581.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. 1957. La Poétique de l’espace. Paris.Google Scholar
Bader, F. 1983. “Héraklès et les points cardinaux”, Minos 18: 219–256.Google Scholar
Baker, H. D. 2013. “The Image of the City in Hellenistic Babylonia”, in Stavrianopoulou, E., ed., Shifting Social Imaginaries in the Hellenistic Period: Narrations, Practices, and Images. Leiden, 51–65.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Holquist, M.. Austin.Google Scholar
Bakhuizen van den Brink, J. N. 1976. “Structural Text Analysis and the Problem of Unity in the Odes of Pindar”, Acta Classica 19: 1–19.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 2005a [1991]. “Peripheral and Nuclear Semantics”, in Bakker, E. J., ed., Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Cambridge, MA, 1–21.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 2005b [2002]. “Remembering the God’s Arrival”, in Bakker, E. J., ed., Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Cambridge, MA, 136–153.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 2013. The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bakola, E. 2019. “Space, Place and the Metallurgical Imagination of the Prometheus Trilogy”, in Braund, D., Hall, E., Wyles, R., ed., Ancient Theatre and Performance Culture Around the Black Sea. Cambridge, 225–251.Google Scholar
Ballabriga, A. 1986. Le Soleil et le Tartare. L’image mythique du monde en Grèce archaïque. Paris.Google Scholar
Ballabriga, A. 1998. Les fictions d’Homère. L’invention mythologique et cosmographique dans l’Odyssée. Paris.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. 2008. Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M., ed. 2012. Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barbara, S. 2011. “Encore sur le mythe de royauté des scythes d’après le ‘logos skythikos’ d’Hérodote (IV, 5–7) et le problème des sources du ‘scythicos logos’ (sic) d’Hérodote”, in Barbara, S., Mazoyer, M., J. Meurant, J., ed., Figures royales des mondes anciens. Paris, 31–57.Google Scholar
Barbu, D. 2018. “À propos des prêtres et du ‘clergé’ dans l’Israël ancien et le judaïsme pré-rabbinique”, in Coulon, L., Gatier, P-L, ed., Le clergé dans les sociétés antiques. Statut et recrutement. Paris, 78–94.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1994. “Immovable Delos: Aeneid 3.73–98 and the Hymns of Callimachus”, CQ 44: 438–443.Google Scholar
Barker, E. 2006. “Paging the Oracle: Interpretation, Identity and Performance in Herodotus’ History”, Greece & Rome 53: 1–28.Google Scholar
Barker, E. 2009. Entering the Agon: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography, and Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barker, E., Bouzarovski, S., Pelling, C. B. R., Isaksen, L., ed. 2016. New Worlds from Old Texts: Revisiting Ancient Space and Place. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, J. H. 1969. “Une note sur Pindare, Pyth. X, 28–31”, Acta Classica 12: 169–170.Google Scholar
Bar-Kochva, B. 1996. Pseudo-Hecataeus, On the Jews: Legitimizing the Jewish Diaspora. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bar-Kochva, B. 2010. The Image of the Jews in Greek Literature: The Hellenistic Period. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Barringer, J. M. 2009. “The Olympic Altis before the Temple of Zeus”, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 124: 223–250.Google Scholar
Barth, C. K. 1836. Die altteutsche Religion, vol. 2: Die Hyperboreer. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1989. Cosmologies in the Making: A Generative Approach to Cultural Variation in Inner New Guinea. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 2000. “Boundaries and Connections”, in Cohen, A. P., ed., Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Value. London, 17–35.Google Scholar
Baslez, M-F. 1997. “Le sanctuaire de Délos dans le dernier tiers du IVe siècle: étude historique des premiers inventaires de l’Indépendance”, REA 99: 345–356.Google Scholar
Basso, K. H. 1996. Wisdom Sits in Places: Landscape and Language among the Western Apache. New Mexico.Google Scholar
Bauer, M. 2017. “Der Dichter und sein Sänger: Orpheus und Apollonios im Paian (Apollonios Rhodios 2, 669–719)”, A&A 63: 58–77.Google Scholar
Baumgärtner, I. 2011. “Erzählungen kartieren. Jerusalem in mittelalterlichen Kartenräumen”, in Glauch, S., Köbele, S., Störmer-Caysa, U., ed., Projektion – Reflexion – Ferne. Räumliche Vorstellungen und Denkfiguren im Mittelalter. Berlin, 193–223.Google Scholar
Baur, L. 1912. Die philosophischen Werke des Robert Grosseteste, Bischofs von Lincoln. Münster.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. 2009. “Ordering Wonderland: Ovid’s Pythagoras and the Augustan Vision”, in Hardie, P., ed., Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford, 288–309.Google Scholar
Beard, M., Henderson, J. 1995. Classics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, M-C. 2016. The Sea in the Greek Imagination. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Beaumont, R. L. 1936. “Greek Influence in the Adriatic Sea before the Fourth Century B. C.”, JHS 56: 159–204.Google Scholar
Bearzot, C. 1989. “Fenomeni naturali e prodigi nell’attacco celtico a Delfi (279 a. C.)”, Contributi dell’Istituto di Storia antica dell’Università del Sacro Cuore 15: 71–86.Google Scholar
Bearzot, C. 1992. Storia e storiografia ellenistica in Pausania il Periegeta. Venice.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, P-A. 2014. “Nabû and Apollo: The Two Faces of Seleucid Religious Policy”, in Hoffmann, F., Schmidt, K. S., ed., Orient und Okzident in Hellenistischer Zeit. Vaterstetten, 13–20.Google Scholar
Beazley, J. D. 1956. Attic Black-Figure Vase-Painters. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beazley, J. D. 1964. The Berlin Painter. Parkville.Google Scholar
Beck, C. W., Southard, G. C., Adams, A. B. 1968. “Analysis and Provenience of Minoan and Mycenaean Amber: II: Tiryns”, GRBS 9: 5–19.Google Scholar
Beck, H. 2018. “‘If I am from Megara.’ Introduction to the Local Discourse Environment of an Ancient Greek City-State” Teiresias 1: 15–45.Google Scholar
Becker, O. 1937. Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Berlin.Google Scholar
Beckers, W. J. 1914. “Das rätselhafte Hochgebirge des Altertums, die sogenannten Rhipäen”, Geographische Zeitschrift 20: 534–557.Google Scholar
Beekes, R. 2009. Etymological Dictionary of Greek, 2 vol. Leiden.Google Scholar
Beghini, A. 2020. [Platone], Assioco. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
Bell, A., Ryan, M-L., ed. 2019. Possible Worlds Theory and Contemporary Narratology. Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Benitez, R., Tarrant, H. 2015. “Philosophy”, in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion. Oxford, 211–223.Google Scholar
Bérard, C. 1971. “Architecture érétrienne et mythologie delphique. Le Daphnéphoréion”, Antike Kunst 14: 59–73.Google Scholar
Berg, J. R. 2013. “‘Breasts of the North’ and Other Apocalyptic Imagery in the Cosmographia of Aethicus Ister”, in Wieser, V., Zolles, C., Feik, C., Zolles, M., Schlöndorff, L., ed., Abendländische Apokalyptik. Kompendium zur Genealogie der Endzeit. Berlin, 563–576.Google Scholar
Berger, E. H. 1880. Die geographischen Fragmente des Eratosthenes. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Berger, E. H. 1887–1893. Geschichte der wissenschaftlichen Erdkunde der Griechen, 4 vol. Berlin.Google Scholar
Berger, E. H. 1904. Mythische Kosmographie der Griechen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bergren, A. 1975. The Etymology and Usage of Peirar in Early Greek Poetry: A Study in the Interrelationship of Metrics, Linguistics and Poetics. State College, PA.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. 1987. Poetae epici graeci I. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bernadete, S. 1969. Herodotean Inquiries. The Hague.Google Scholar
Bernand, A. 1985. La carte du tragique. La géographie dans la tragédie grecque. Paris.Google Scholar
Bernard, G. 2012. “Monstres et héros des confins occidentaux de l’oikoumène”, in Prados, F., García, I., Bernard, G., eds., Confines. El extremo del mundo durante la Antigüedad. Alicante, 73–94.Google Scholar
Bernard, M. 1963. Pindars Denken in Bildern. Pfullingen.Google Scholar
Bernardini, P. A. 1991. “La hybris delli asini e il riso di Apollo in Pindaro, Pyth. 10, 36”, in Buttitta, A., ed., Studi di filologia classica in onore di Giusto Monaco. Palermo, 155–159.Google Scholar
Bernstein, H. J. 2012. “Cosmography, Local History, and National Sentiment: François de Belleforest and the History of Paris”, French Historical Studies 35: 31–60.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. W. 2003. “Ancestors, Status, and Self-Presentation in Statius’ Thebaid”, TAPhA 133: 353–379.Google Scholar
Bertazzoli, V. 2009. “Il peana di Filodamo Scarfeo per Dioniso”, Paideia 64: 437–475.Google Scholar
Bertelli, L. 2001. “Hecataeus: From Genealogy to Historiography”, in Luraghi, N., ed., The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus. Oxford, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berzon, T. S. 2016. Classifying Christians. Ethnography, Heresiology, and the Limits of Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Beschi, F. 2017. “La menzione degli Iperborei negli Epigoni”, Studi Classici e Orientali 63: 59–72.Google Scholar
Besse, J-M., Couzinet, M-D., ed. 2009. Les méditations cosmographiques à la Renaissance. Paris.Google Scholar
Bessire, L., Bond, D. 2015. “Ontological Anthropology and the Deferral of Critique”, American Ethnologist 41: 440–456.Google Scholar
Bettinetti, S. 2001. La statua di culto nella pratica rituale greca. Bari.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. 2012. Vertere. Un’ antropologia della traduzione nella cultura antica. Turin.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. 2013 [1994]. Women and Weasels. Mythologies of Birth in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago.Google Scholar
Beyer, I. 1974. “Die Reliefgiebel des alten Athenatempels der Akropolis”, AA 89: 639–650.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 1988. “Il confine Europa-Asia in Eschilo”, Sileno: Rivista Semestrale di Studi Classici e Cristiani 14: 205–214.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 1990. “Avieno, Ora mar. 80 ss: le Colonne d’Eracle e il vento del nord”, Sileno: Rivista Semestrale di Studi Classici e Cristiani 16: 241–246.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 1998. L’Oceano. Pitea di Massalia. Pisa.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 2002. “Cannibali in Irlanda? Letture Straboniane”, Ancient Society 32: 295–314.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 2005. “La geografia di Pitea e la diorthosis di Polibio”, in Schepens, G., Bollansée, J., ed., The Shadow of Polybius: Intertextuality as a Research Tool in Greek Historiography. Leuven, 255–270.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 2006. “L’Eratostene di Strabone”, Pallas 72: 35–46.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 2009. “La geografia delle Supplici di Eschilo come immagine dei valori della polis ateniese”, Sileno: Rivista Semestrale di Studi Classici e Cristiani 35: 117–128.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S. 2015. “Il ‘Grande Nord’ tra scienza e letteratura fantastica da Pitea a Antonio Diogene”, Orbis Terrarum 13: 11–31.Google Scholar
Bianchetti, S., Cataudella, M. R., Gehrke, H-J., ed. 2015. Brill’s Companion to Ancient Geography: The Inhabited World in Greek and Roman Tradition. Leiden.Google Scholar
Biancucci, G. B., 1973. “La via iperborea”, RFIC 101: 207–220.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2000. Herodots Welt: Der Aufbau der Historie am Bild der fremden Länder und Völker, ihrer Zivilisation und ihrer Geschichte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2006a. “An der Grenzen zur Phantastik: antike Fahrtenberichte und ihre Beglaubigungsstrategien”, in Hömke, N., M. Baumbach, , ed., Fremde Wirklichkeiten: literarische Fantastik und antike Literatur. Heidelberg, 237–259.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2006b. “Über Grenzen und ihre Relativität im Licht von Herodots Historien”, in Burtscher-Bechter, B., Haider, P. W., Mertz-Baumgartner, B., Rollinger, R., ed., Grenzen und Entgrenzungen: Historische und kulturwissenschaftliche Überlegungen am Beispiel des Mittelmeerraums. Saarbrücken, 155–170.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2007. “Herodots Historien unter dem Aspekt des Raumerfassung”, in Rathmann, M., ed., Wahrnehmung und Erfassung geographischer Räume in der Antike. Mainz, 67–80.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2008 [1996]. “Politische Ordnung und fremde Kultur im Bild der hellenistischen Utopie”, in Rollinger, R., ed., Reinhold Bichler. Historiographie, Ethnographie, Utopie: gesammelte Schriften. 2: Studien zur Utopie und der Imagination fremder Welten. Wiesbaden, 105–127.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2008. “L’ethnographie d’Hérodote”, in Mezzadri, B., ed., Historiens de l’Antiquité. Paris, 49–73.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2011. “Die Fahrt zu den Grenzen der Erde: von Herodot bis zur Alexander-Historiographie”, Gymnasium 118: 315–344.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2013a. “Zur Veranschaulichung des geographischen Wissens in Herodots Historien”, in Boschung, D., Greub, T., J. Hammerstaedt, , ed., Geographische Kenntnisse und ihre konkreten Ausformungen. Munich, 74–89.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. 2013b. “Ein merkwürdiger Fall von Euergesie. Alexander der Große und die Geschichte von Kyros und den Arimaspen”, in Breitwieser, R., Frass, M., Nightingale, G., Calamus. Festschrift für Herbert Graßl zum 65. Geburtstag. Wiesbaden, 51–62 (= R. Rollinger and K. Ruffing, ed. 2016. Historiographie – Ethnographie – Utopie. Gesammelte Schriften IV: Studien zur griechischen Historiographie. Wiesbaden, 157–167).Google Scholar
Bieler, L. 1931. “Die Sage von Perseus und das 10. Pythische Gedicht Pindars”, WS 49: 119–128.Google Scholar
Bietenholz, P. G. 1994. Historia and Fabula: Myths and Legends in Historical Thought from Antiquity to the Modern Age. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bigalli, D. 1971. I Tartari et l’Apocalisse. Ricerche su l’escatologia in Adamo Marsh e Ruggero Bacone. Florence.Google Scholar
Bilić, T. 2012. “Apollo, Helios, and the Solstices in the Athenian, Delphian, and Delian Calendars”, Numen 59: 509–532.Google Scholar
Biller, P. 1985. “Words and the Medieval Notion ‘Religion’”, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 36: 351–369.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. 1999. Seneca. Hercules Furens: Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Leiden.Google Scholar
Binder, C., Kretschmer, I. 1994. “La projection mercatorienne”, in Watelet, M., ed., Gérard Mercator cosmographe. Le temps et l’espace. Antwerp, 192–207.Google Scholar
Binding, P. 2003. Imagined Corners: Exploring the World’s First Atlas. London.Google Scholar
Bing, P. 1988. The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Biraschi, A. M. 2005. “Strabo and Homer: A Chapter in Cultural History”, in Dueck, D., Lindsay, H., Pothecary, S., ed., Strabo’s Cultural Geography: The Making of a Kolossourgia. Cambridge, 73–85.Google Scholar
Birge, D. 1994. “Sacred Groves and the Nature of Apollo”, in Solomon, J., ed., Apollo: Origins and Influences. Tucson, 9–19.Google Scholar
Bîrzescu, I. 2006. “Some Ceramic Inscriptions from Istrian Sanctuaries: The Naucratis Approach”, in Villing, A., Schlotzhauer, U., ed., Naukratis: Greek Diversity in Egypt. Studies on East Greek Pottery and Exchange in the Eastern Mediterranean. London, 169–174.Google Scholar
Black, J. 2018. Mapping Shakespeare: An Exploration of Shakespeare’s Worlds through Maps. London.Google Scholar
Blanchot, M. 1955. L’Espace littéraire. Paris.Google Scholar
Blok, J. 1996. “Proof and Persuasion in Black Athena: The Case of K. O. Müller”, Journal of the History of Ideas 57: 705–772.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. 1993. “The Superlative ‘Nomoi’ of Herodotus’ Histories”, CA 12: 30–50.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2000. “Herodotus’ Genres”, in Depew, M., Obbink, D., ed., Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA, 97–114.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. 2002. “Epic Heritage and Mythical Patterns in Herodotus”, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H., ed., Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden, 97–116.Google Scholar
Boisacq, E. 1938. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bold, R., ed. 2019. Indigenous Perceptions of the End of the World: Creating a Cosmopolitics of Change. London.Google Scholar
Bold, R. 2020. “Constructing Cosmoscapes: Cosmological Currents in Conversation and Contestation in Contemporary Bolivia”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 10: 195–208.Google Scholar
Bollansée, J. 1999. “Aristotle and Hermippos of Smyrna on the Foundation of the Olympic Games and the Institution of the Sacred Truce”, Mnemosyne 52: 562–567.Google Scholar
Bolton, J. D. P. 1962. Aristeas of Proconnesus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bömer, F. 1986. P. Ovidius Naso. Metamorphosen. Buch XIV–XV. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bommelaer, J-F. 2000. “Un peu d’air des îles à Delphes?”, Ktèma 25: 65–74.Google Scholar
Bommelaer, J-F. 2008. “Delphica I. À nouveau les comptes de Delphes et la reconstruction du temple d’Apollon av. J-C.”, BCH 132: 221–255.Google Scholar
Bommelaer, J-F., Laroche, D. 1991. Guide de Delphes. Le site. Athens.Google Scholar
Bongiovani, R. 2015. “Aristomakhou as a Proper Noun in the Prooimial Priamel of Pindar’s Pythian 10”, GRBS 55: 300–314.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A. 2004. “Communication in Pindar’s Deictic Acts”, in Felson, N., ed., The Poetics of Deixis in Alcman, Pindar, and Other Lyric Poets, Arethusa 37: 391–414.Google Scholar
Bonnafé, A. 1991. “Texte, carte et territoire: autour de l’itinéraire de Io dans le Prométhée”, Journal des Savants 1991: 133–193.Google Scholar
Bonnechere, P. 2003. Trophonios de Lébadée. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bonnechere, P., Cursaru, G. 2020. “Ἀρχή and δῖνος: Vortices as Cosmogonical Powers and Cosmic Regulators. Study Case: The Whirling Lightning Bolt of Zeus”, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Bonnet, C., Bricault, L. 2016. Quand les dieux voyagent: cultes et mythes en mouvement dans l’espace méditerranéen antique. Geneva.Google Scholar
Borgeaud, P. 1994. “Le couple sacré/profane. Genèse et fortune d’un concept ‘opératoire’ en histoire des religions”, Revue de l’histoire des religions 211: 387–418 (= Borgeaud, P. 2016. Exercices d’histoire des religions. Comparaison, rites, mythes et émotions. Leiden, 21–46).Google Scholar
Borgeaud, P. 2006. “L’Orient des religions: réflexion sur la construction d’une polarité, de Creuzer à Bachofen”, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 8: 153–162.Google Scholar
Borgeaud, P., Gardiol, R. 2009. “Myth or (and, along with) history”, in Le Fort, G., Gardiol, R., Matteo, S., Helmke, C., eds., The Maya and their Sacred Narratives: Text and Context in Maya Mythologies. Markt Schwaben, 11–16.Google Scholar
Borst, A. 1994. Das Buch der Naturgeschichte. Plinius und seine Leser im Zeitalter des Pergaments. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Boshnakova, A. 2007. “Hermeneutics of the Archaeological Artifact: Destruction and Reconstruction of the Lost Meaning”, in Boshnakov, K., ed., Jubilaeus, VI. Sbornik v pamet na Karel i Hermenegild Škorpil. Sofia, 51–102.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1980. A Historical Commentary on Arrian’s History of Alexander, I: Commentary on Books I–III. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1981. “A Missing Year in the History of Alexander the Great”, JHS 101: 17–39.Google Scholar
Bottini, A. 1992. Archeologia della salvezza: l’escatologia greca nelle testimonianze archeologiche. Milan.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J. 1996. “Pensée scientifique et pensée mythique en Grèce ancienne”, Les études classiques 64: 213–226.Google Scholar
Boulogne, J., Broze, M., Couloubaritsis, L., ed. 2006. Les platonismes des premiers siècles de notre ère. Plutarque, L’E de Delphes: traduction nouvelle et commentaire. Brussels.Google Scholar
Bousquet, J. 1951. “Observations sur l’omphalos archaïque de Delphes”, BCH 75: 210–223.Google Scholar
Bousquet, J. 1964. “Delphes et les Aglaurides d’Athènes”, BCH 88: 655–675.Google Scholar
Boutsikas, E. 2020. The Cosmos in Ancient Greek Religious Experience: Sacred Space, Memory, and Cognition. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bowden, H. 2005. Classical Athens and the Delphic Oracle: Divination and Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bowden, R. 2004. “A Critique of Alfred Gell on Art and Agency”, Oceania 74: 309–324.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. 1988. “On Interpreting Plato”, in Griswold, C., ed., Platonic Writings. Platonic Readings. University Park, 49–65.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2009. “Wandering Poets, Archaic Style”, in Hunter, R. L. and Rutherford, I., ed., Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge, 105–136.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. 2015. “Time and Place, Narrative and Speech in Philicus, Philodamus, and Limenius”, in Faulkner, A., Hodkinson, O., ed., Hymnic Narrative and the Narratology of Greek Hymns. Leiden, 87–119.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1956. “A Fragment of the Arimaspea”, CQ 6: 1–10.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1964. Pindar. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowra, C. M. 1990. On Greek Margins. Oxford.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. 1934. “Sur l’Abaris d’Héraclide le Pontique”, REA 36: 321–351.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. 1937. Le culte des Muses chez les philosophes grecs. Paris.Google Scholar
Boyancé, P. 1946. “Les Muses et l’harmonie des sphères”, Mélanges dédiés à la mémoire de F. Grat, I: Antiquité, Moyen âge, Islam. Paris, 3–16.Google Scholar
Braccesi, L. 1994. Grecità di frontiera: i percorsi occidentali della leggenda. Padova.Google Scholar
Brague, R. 1999. La sagesse du monde. Histoire de l’expérience humaine de l’univers. Paris.Google Scholar
Brague, R. 2003 [1999]. The Wisdom of the World: The Human Experience of the Universe in Western Thought, trans. T. L. Fagan. Chicago.Google Scholar
Branscome, D. 2010. “Herodotus and the Map of Aristagoras”, CA 29: 1–44.Google Scholar
Branscome, D. 2013. Textual Rivals: Self-Presentation in Herodotus’ Histories. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Braswell, B. K. 1988. A Commentary on the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindar. Berlin.Google Scholar
Braswell, B. K. 1992. A Commentary on Pindar Nemean One. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 2005. “Pericles, Cleon and the Pontus: The Black Sea in Athens c. 440–421”, in Braund, D., ed., Scythians and Greeks: Cultural Interactions in Scythia, Athens and the Early Roman Empire (Sixth Century BC–First Century AD). Exeter, 80–99.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 2007. “Greater Olbia: Ethnic, Religious, Economic, and Political Interactions in the Region of Olbia, c. 600–100 BC”, in Braund, D., Kryzhitskiy, S. D., ed., Classical Olbia and the Scythian World: From the Sixth Century BC to the Second Century AD. Oxford, 37–77.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 2008. “Scythian Laughter: Conversations in the Northern Black Sea Region in the 5th Century BC”, in Guldager Bilde, P., Petersen, J. H., ed., Meetings of Cultures in the Black Sea Region: Between Conflict and Coexistence. Aarhus, 347–367.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 2010. “Teutaros, the Scythian Teacher of Herakles”, in Catling, R. W. V., Marchand, F., ed., Onomatologos: Studies in Greek Personal Names Presented to Elaine Matthews. Oxford, 381–389.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 2011. “Heracles the Scythian: Herodotus, Herodorus and Colonial Cultures”, in Papuci-Wladika, E., ed., PONTIKA 2008: Recent Research on the Northern and Eastern Black Sea in Ancient Times. Oxford, 15–19.Google Scholar
Braund, D. 2018. Greek Religion and Cults in the Black Sea Region: Goddesses in the Bosporan Kingdom from the Archaic Period to the Byzantine Era. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, B. 1974. “Une lettre sur plomb de Berezan: Colonisation et modes de contacts dans le Pont”, DHA 1: 134–149.Google Scholar
Bravo, B. 2001. “Un frammento della Piccola Iliade (P. Oxy. 2510), lo stilo narrativo tardo-arcaico, i racconti su Achille immortale”, QUCC 67: 49–114.Google Scholar
Bravo, B. 2007. “Testi iniziatici da Olbia Pontica (VI e V sec. a.C.) e osservazioni su orfismo e religione civica”, Palamedes 2: 55–92.Google Scholar
Bravo, B. 2011. “Una Tavoletta d’osso da Olbia Pontica della seconda metà del VI secolo a. C. (SEG XXXVI, 694): Apollo di Didyma e la nascita di ‘Olbiē polis’”, ZPE 176: 99–119.Google Scholar
Bravo, B. 2018. Erodoto sulla Scizia e il lontano Nord-Est: contributo all’interpretazione del cosiddetto logos scitico. Rome.Google Scholar
Bredholdt, C. 2009. “‘Cult’ in the Study of Religion and Archaeology,” in Jensen, J. T., ed., Aspects of Ancient Greek Cult. Aarhus, 13–27.Google Scholar
Breglia Pulci Doria, L. 1984. “Demetra tra Eubea e Beozia e i suoi rapporti con Artemis, II”, in Breglia Pulci Doria, L., Ellinger, P., Frontisi-Ducroux, F., Lepore, E., Montepaone, C., Vernant, J-P, Recherches sur les cultes grecs et l’Occident, II. Naples, 69–88.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M., Furley, W. D. 2001. Greek Hymns, 2 vol. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1983. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 1994. Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2002a. The Rise and Fall of the Afterlife. London.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2002b. “Odysseus versus the Cyclops”, in Des Bouvrie, S., ed., Myth and Symbol 1: Symbolic Phenomena in Ancient Greek Culture. Sävedalen, 135–152.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2010. “Introduction”, in Bremmer, J. N., Erskine, A., ed., The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations. Edinburgh, 1–18 (= CE 2, 3–21).Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2016a. “Shamanism in Classical Scholarship: Where Are We Now?”, in Jackson, P., ed., Horizons of Shamanism: A Triangular Approach. Stockholm, 52–78.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2016b. “The Birth of Paradise: To Early Christianity, via Greece, Persia and Israel”, in Scaffi, A., ed., The Cosmography of Paradise: The Other World from Ancient Mesopotamia to Medieval Europe. London, 9–30.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2018. “Method and Madness in the Study of Greek Shamanism: The Case of Peter Kingsley”, Asdiwal 13: 93–109.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. 1977. In Mist Apparelled: Religious Themes in Plutarch’s Moralia and Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar
Briand, M. 2003. “Le vocabulaire de l’excellence chez Pindare”, Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 77: 203–208.Google Scholar
Briand, M. 2005. “Questions de cohérence et de cohésion dans la poésie mélique grecque archaïque: la transition entre discours d’actualité et récit mythique”, in Jaubert, A., Biraud, M., ed., Cohésion et cohérence: études de linguistique textuelle. Lyon, 79–98.Google Scholar
Briand, M. 2010. “Liaison poétique, alliance rituelle: harmonia chez Pindare”, in Gaye, P., Malhomme, F., Rispoli, G. M., Wersinger, A-G, ed., L’Harmonie, entre philosophie, science et arts, de l’Antiquité à l’âge moderne. Naples, 209–227.Google Scholar
Briand, M. 2014. Pindare. Olympiques. Paris.Google Scholar
Briand, M. 2018. “Delphes dans les Pythiques de Pindare ‘ … près du nombril central de notre mère aux beaux arbres’ (Py. IV, 73–74)”, in Luce, J-M, ed., Delphes et la littérature d’Homère à nos jours. Paris, 35–61.Google Scholar
Bridges, J. H. 1897. The Opus Majus of Roger Bacon, vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Bridgman, T. P. 2005. Hyperboreans: Myth and History in Celtic-Hellenic Contacts. London.Google Scholar
Bright, D. F. 1976. “The myths of Bacchylides III”, Classical Folia 30: 174–190.Google Scholar
Brillet-Dubois, P. 2018. “Philodamos et Delphes”, in Luce, J-M, ed., Delphes et la littérature d’Homère à nos jours. Paris, 63–76.Google Scholar
von den Brincken, A.-D. 1992. Fines terrae. Die Enden der Erde und der vierte Kontinent auf mittelalterlichen Weltkarten. Hanover.Google Scholar
Brock, R. 2003. “Authoritative Voice and Narrative Management in Herodotus”, in Derow, P., Parker, R., ed., Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest. Oxford, 3–16.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 1994. Pomponius Mela: Kreuzfahrt durch die antike Welt. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 1995. Terra cognita: Studien zur römischen Raumerfassung. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 1996. “Demensuratio provinciarum und Divisio orbis terrarum”, in Brodersen, K., ed., Plinius: Naturkunde, lateinisch-deutsch, vol. 4. Zürich, 328–366.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2008. “Die Geographie des Plinius”, in Brodersen, K., ed., Caius Plinius Secundus d.Ä., Naturkunde, vol. 2. Munich, 225–236.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2011. “Mapping Pliny’s World: The Achievement of Solinus”, BICS 53: 63–88.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2014. ed., Solinus: New Studies. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Brodersen, K. 2017. “The Geographies of Pliny and His ‘Ape’ Solinus”, in Dueck, D., ed., The Routledge Companion to Strabo. London, 298–310.Google Scholar
Brown, A. S. 1998. “From the Golden Age to the Isles of the Blest”, Mnemosyne 51: 385–410.Google Scholar
Brown, C. 1992. “The Hyperboreans and Nemesis in Pindar’s Tenth Pythian”, Phoenix 46: 95–107.Google Scholar
Brown, W. E. 1955. “Some Hellenistic Utopias”, CW 48: 57–62.Google Scholar
Bruit, L. 1989. “Les dieux aux festins des mortels. Théoxénies et xeniai”, in Laurens, A-F, ed., Entre hommes et dieux. Le convive, le héros, le prophète. Paris, 12–25.Google Scholar
Bruit-Zaidman, L. 1993. “La piété pythagoricienne et l’Apollon de Délos”, Métis 8: 261–269.Google Scholar
Bruit-Zaidman, L. 2011. Le commerce des dieux. Eusebeia: essai sur la piété en Grèce ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Brulé, P. 1987. La fille d’Athènes. La religion des filles d’Athènes à l’époque classique. Mythes, cultes et société. Paris.Google Scholar
Brumbaugh, M. 2019. The New Politics of Olympos: Kingship in Kallimachos’ Hymns. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bruneau, P. 1970. Recherches sur les cultes de Délos à l’époque hellénistique et à l’époque impériale. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruneau, P. 1991. “L’Hymne à Délos de Callimaque et les cultes déliens”, Études et travaux 15: 94–98.Google Scholar
Bruneau, J., Ducat, J. 2005. Guide de Délos, 4th ed. Athens.Google Scholar
Brunel, J. 1953. “À propos des transferts de culte. Un sens méconnu du mot aphydruma”, Revue de philologie 27: 21–33.Google Scholar
Bucciantini, V. 2016. “Megastene e la ‘Reiseliteratur’: resoconti di viaggio tra descrizione, memoria e rappresentazione”, in Wiesehöfer, J., Brinkhaus, H., Bichler, R., ed., Megasthenes und seine Zeit. Wiesbaden, 37–62.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. 2013. “Alcman’s Nightscapes (frs. 89 and 90 PMGF)”, HSCP 107: 35–53.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. 2018. Greek Lyric: A Selection. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F., Phillips, T. 2018. “Introduction”, in Budelmann, F., Phillips, T., ed., Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece. Oxford, 1–28.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena.Google Scholar
Bujskij, S. 2006. “Die kolonialen Heiligtümer der archaischen Zeit in Olbia”, in Conrad, S., ed., Pontos Euxeinos: Beiträge zur Archäologie und Geschichte des Antiken Schwarzmeer- und Balkanraumes. Langenweissbach, 265–274.Google Scholar
Bulloch, A. 1984. “The Future of a Hellenistic Illusion. Some Observations on Callimachus and Religion”, MH 41: 209–230.Google Scholar
Bultrighini, U., Torelli, M., ed. 2017. Pausania. Guida della Grecia. Libro X. Milan.Google Scholar
Bunbury, E. H. 1879. A History of Ancient Geography among the Greeks and Romans from the Earliest Ages till the Fall of the Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar
Bundy, E. L. 1962. Studia Pindarica (I–II). Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bureau, B. 2014. “Idealised Past and Contested Tradition: Claudian’s Panegyric for the Sixth Consulship of Honorius and Prudentius’ Contra Symmachum”, in Alroth, B., Scheffer, C., ed., Attitudes towards the Past in Antiquity: Creating Identities. Stockholm, 301–310.Google Scholar
Bureau, B. 2016. “Présence/absence de Lucain dans les deux livres du Contre Rufin”, in Berlincourt, V., Galli Milić, L., Nelis, D. P., ed., Lucan and Claudian: Context and Intertext. Heidelberg, 175–197.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. 2009. The Death and Afterlife of Achilles. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. 2016. “Localization of the Odyssey’s Underworld”, Cahier des études anciennes 53: 15–37.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. 2017. “Land and Sea in the Odyssey and the Telegony”, in Bierl, A., Christopoulos, M., Papachrysostomou, A., ed., Time and Space in Ancient Myth, Religion and Culture. Berlin, 27–41.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1962. “Γόης. Zum griechischen Schamanismus”, RhM 105: 36–55 (= KS 3, 173–190).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1963. Review of Bolton 1962, Gnomon 35: 235–240.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972 [1962]. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, trans. E. L. Minar, Jr. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1983 [1972]. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, trans. P. Bing. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1985 [1977]. Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical, trans. J. Raffan. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1988. “Katagógia-Anagógia and the Goddess of Knossos”, in Hägg, R., Marinatos, N., Nordquist, G. C., ed., Early Greek Cult Practice. Stockholm, 81–88 (= KS 6, 90–103).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1990a. “Apollon Didim i Ol’vija”, VDI 193: 155–160.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1990b. “Herodot als Historiker fremder Religionen”, in Reverdin, O., ed., Hérodote et les peuples non-grecs. Vandoeuvres-Genève, 1–39 (= KS 7, 140–160).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1994. “Olbia and Apollo of Didyma: A New Oracle Text”, in Solomon, J., ed., Apollo. Origins and Influences. Tucson, 49–60 (= KS 6, 43–55).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1998. “Héraclès et les animaux. Perspectives préhistoriques et pressions historiques”, in Bonnet, C., Jourdain-Annequin, C., Pirenne-Delforge, V., ed., Le bestiaire d’Héraclès. Liège, 11–26 (= KS 6, 74–90).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1999. “The Logic of Cosmogony”, in Buxton, R., ed., From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford, 87–107 (= KS 2, 230–247).Google Scholar
Burns, M. 1981. “Boreas and Oreithyia in Greek Vase Painting”, Ziva Antika 31: 215–232.Google Scholar
Burton, D. 2016. “Utopian Motifs in Early Greek Concepts of the Afterlife”, Antichthon 50: 1–16.Google Scholar
Burton, R. W. B. 1980. The Chorus in Sophocles’ Tragedies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. 1906. “The Homeric and the Historic Kimmerians”, Klio 6: 79–88.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. 1956. History of Greece. London.Google Scholar
Busch, S. 1993. “Orpheus bei Apollonios Rhodios”, Hermes 121: 301–324.Google Scholar
Buxton, R. G. A. 1994. Imaginary Greece: The Contexts of Mythology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Buxton, R. G. A., ed. 1999. From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Buxton, R. G. A. 2017. “Landscapes of the Cyclopes”, in Hawes, G., ed., Myths on the Map: The Storied Landscapes of Ancient Greece. Oxford, 52–64.Google Scholar
Byre, C. S. 1997. “On the Departure from Pagasae and the Passage of the Planctae in Apollonius’ Argonautica”, MH 54: 106–114.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, M. 2010. “Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections Beyond ‘Politics’”, Cultural Anthropology 25: 334–370.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, M., Blaser, M., ed. 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Caerols Pérez, J. J. 1991. Hélanico de Lesbos. Fragmentos. Madrid.Google Scholar
Cahen, É. 1930. Les hymnes de Callimaque. Commentaire explicatif et critique. Paris.Google Scholar
Cahn, H. E. 1950. “Die Löwen des Apollon”, MH 7: 185–199.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. 2010. Bacchylides. Five Epinician Odes: (3, 5, 9, 11, 13). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. 2011. “The Principle of Alternation and the Tyrant’s Happiness in Bacchylidean Epinician”, Symbolae Osloenses 85: 17–35.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1991. “Mythe et rite en Grèce : des catégories indigènes ?”, Kernos 4: 179–204.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1992. “Narration légendaire et programme poétique dans l’Hymne à Apollon de Callimaque”, Études de lettres (October–December): 41–66.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1996a. Thésée et l’imaginaire athénien: légende et culte en Grèce antique. Paris.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 1996b. “Le mythe: une catégorie hellène”, in Desclos, M-L, ed., Réflexions contemporaines sur l’antiquité classique. Grenoble, 85–107.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2000. Poétique des mythes dans la Grèce ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2004. “Le funzioni di un racconto genealogico: Acusilao di Argo e la nascita della storiografia”, in Angeli Bernardini, P., ed., La città di Argo: Mito, Storia, tradizioni poetiche. Rome, 229–243.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2006. Pratiques poétiques de la mémoire. Représentations de l’espace-temps en Grèce ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2009. “Apollo in Delphi and Delos: Poetic Performance between Paean and Dithyramb”, in Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P., Miller, J. F., ed., Apolline Politics and Poetics. Athens, 169–197.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2011a. Mythe et histoire dans l’Antiquité grecque. La création symbolique d’une colonie, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2011b. “The Homeric Hymns as Poetic Offerings: Musical and Ritual Relationships with the Gods”, in Faulkner, A., ed., Homeric Hymns: Interpretive Essays. Oxford, 334–357.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2015. Qu’est-ce que la mythologie grecque? Paris.Google Scholar
Calame, C. 2019 [1977]. Les Chœurs de jeunes filles en Grèce ancienne. Morphologie, fonction religieuse et sociale (Les parthénées d’Alcman), 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. 1983. Studies in the Third Book of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Campos Daroca, F. J., López Cruces, J. L. 2006. “Maxime de Tyr et la voix du philosophe”, Philosophie antique: Problèmes, renaissances, usages 6: 81–105.Google Scholar
Canfora, L. 1996. Viaggio di Aristea. Rome.Google Scholar
Capovilla, G. 1955. “Le Ἡλιάδες di Eschilo. Problemi sull’Eridanos, sugli Hyperboreoi, su Kyknos e Phaethon”, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo, Accademia di Scienze e Lettere, Classe di Lettere, Scienze morali e storiche 88: 415–482.Google Scholar
Carbon, J-M. 2013. “Dolphin-Pillars”, Epigraphia Anatolica 46: 27–34.Google Scholar
Carbon, J-M. 2016. “The Festival of the Aloulaia, and the Association of the Alouliastai. Notes Concerning the New Inscription from Larisa/Marmarini”, Kernos 29: 185–208.Google Scholar
Carbon, J-M, Pirenne-Delforge, V. 2013. “Priests and Cult Personnel in Three Hellenistic Families”, in Horster, M., Klöckner, A., ed., Cities and Priests: Cult Personnel in Asia Minor and the Aegean Islands from the Hellenistic to the Imperial Period. Berlin, 65–119.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 1976. “Pindar’s Eighth Nemean Ode”, PCPS 22: 26–42.Google Scholar
Carey, C. 2009. “The Third Stasimon of Oedipus at Colonus”, in Goldhill, S., Hall, E., ed., Sophocles and the Greek Tragic Tradition. Cambridge, 119–133.Google Scholar
Carne-Ross, D. S. 1975. “Three Preludes for Pindar”, Arion 2: 160–193.Google Scholar
Carne-Ross, D. S. 1985. Pindar. New Haven.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. 1946. Folk Tale, Fiction and Saga in the Homeric Epics. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Carrasco, D. 2014. Religions of Mesoamerica: Cosmovision and Ceremonial Centers, 2nd ed. Prospect Heights.Google Scholar
Carrasco, D. 2019. “What Is Aztlán? Homeland, Quest, Female Place”, in Lomelí, F. A., Segura, D. A., Benjamin-Labarthe, E., ed., Routledge Handbook of Chicana/o Studies. London, 13–26.Google Scholar
Carrasco, D., Sessions, S., ed. 2007. Cave, City, and Eagle’s Nest: An Interpretive Journey through the Mapa de Cuauhtinchan No. 2, 2 vols. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Carson, A. 1984. “The Burners: A Reading of Bacchylides’ Third Epinician Ode”, Phoenix 38: 111–119.Google Scholar
Carter, J. B. 1987. “The Masks of Ortheia”, AJA 91: 355–383.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P. 1990. “Herodotus and ‘the Other’: A Meditation on Empire”, Échos du Monde Classique 34: 27–40.Google Scholar
Casabona, J. 1966. Recherches sur le vocabulaire des sacrifices en grec des origines à la fin de l’époque classique. Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar
Casevitz, M. 1985. Le vocabulaire de la colonisation en Grèce ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Casevitz, M. 1995. “Sur ἐσχατιά: histoire du mot”, in Rousselle, A., ed., Frontières terrestres, frontières célestes dans l’Antiquité. Perpignan, 19–30.Google Scholar
Casson, S. 1920. “The Hyperboreans”, CR 34: 1–3.Google Scholar
Castiglioni, M. P. 2013. “La ‘voie hyperboréenne’ et Artémis: réflexions sur le voyage, la nature et la destination des offrandes de Délos”, in Ferriès, M-C, Castiglioni, M. P., Létoublon, F., ed., Forgerons, élites et voyageurs d’Homère à nos jours: hommages en mémoire d’Isabelle Ratinaud-Lachkar. Grenoble, 383–405.Google Scholar
Cataudella, M. R. 1987. “La geografia ionica, Erodoto e il Perì Hebdomadôn pseudoippocratico, Cap. 11”, Sileno 13: 33–57.Google Scholar
Catturini, P. 1987. “Dionigi di Siracusa e il mito di Galeote”, RIL 121: 15–23.Google Scholar
Cazzaniga, I. 1969. “Il dio e la cerva nella monetazione di Caulonia”, Rivista Italiana di Numismatica e Scienze Affini 71: 9–24.Google Scholar
Cazzato, V. 2016. “Symposia en plein air in Alcaeus and Others”, in Cazzato, V., Obbink, D., Prodi, E. E., ed., The Cup of Song: Ancient Greek Poetry and the Symposium. Oxford, 184–206.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, P. 2016. “Map, Catalogue, Drama, Narrative: Representations of the Aegean Space”, in Barker, E., Bouzarovski, S., Pelling, C. B. R., Isaksen, L., ed., New Worlds from Old Texts: Revisiting Ancient Space and Place. Oxford, 61–80.Google Scholar
Cella, G. P. 2006. Tracciare confini. Realtà e metafore della distinzione. Bologna.Google Scholar
Centrone, B. 1989. “Abaris l’Hyperboréen”, in Goulet, R., ed., Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques 1. Paris, 44–46.Google Scholar
de Certeau, M. 1981. “Croire: une pratique sociale de la différence”, in Vauchez, A., ed., Faire croire. Modalités de la diffusion et de la réception des messages religieux du XIIe au XVe siècle. Rome, 363–383.Google Scholar
Cesarino, P. de Niemeyer 2016. “Cartographies du Cosmos. Image, parole et savoir chez les Marubo”, in Fausto, C., Severi, C., ed., Paroles en images. Écritures, corps et mémoires. Marseille, 107–135.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton.Google Scholar
Chamois, C. 2016. “Les enjeux épistémologiques de la notion d’Umwelt chez Jakob von Uexküll”, Tétralogiques 21: 171–194.Google Scholar
Champion, C. B. 1995. “The Soteria at Delphi: Aetolian Propaganda in the Epigraphical Record”, AJP 116: 213–220.Google Scholar
Champion, C. B. 1996. “Polybius, Aetolia and the Gallic Attack on Delphi (279 B.C.)”, Historia 45: 315–328.Google Scholar
Champion, C. B. 2004–2005. “In Defense of Hellas: The Antigonid Soteria and Paneia at Delos and the Aetolian Soteria at Delphi”, American Journal of Ancient History 3–4:72–88.Google Scholar
Champion, C. B. 2010. “Timaios (566)”, Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Chandler, C. 2007. “Democritus on Homer and Inspiration, B 21 DK”, Athenaeum: Studi Periodici di Letteratura e Storia dell’Antichità 95: 839–859.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2008. “Priests as Ritual Experts in the Greek World”, in Dignas, B. and Trampedach, K., ed., Practitioners of the Divine: Greek Priests and Religious Officials from Homer to Heliodorus. Cambridge, MA, 17–34.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2010. “The Molpoi Inscription: Ritual Prescription or Riddle?”, Kernos 23: 375–379.Google Scholar
Chaniotis, A. 2013. “Mnemopoetik: die epigraphische Konstruktion von Erinnerung in den griechischen Poleis”, in Dahly, O., Hölscher, T., Muth, S., Schneider, R., ed., Medien der Geschichte. Antikes Griechenland und Rom. Berlin, 132–169.Google Scholar
Chankowski, V. 2008. Athènes et Délos à l’époque classique. Recherches sur l’administration du sanctuaire d’Apollon délien. Paris.Google Scholar
Chantraine, P. 2009. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Chapoutot, J. 2016 [2006]. Greeks, Romans, Germans: How the Nazis Usurped Europe’s Classical Past, trans. R. R. Nybakken. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Chappell, M. 2006. “Delphi and the Homeric Hymn to Apollo”, CQ 56: 331–348.Google Scholar
Charbonnier, P., Salmon, G., Skafish, P., ed. 2017. Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology after Anthropology. London.Google Scholar
Charlet, J-L. 2005. “L’âge d’or dans la poésie de Claudien”, in Lehmann, Y., Freyburger, G., Hirstein, J. S., ed., Antiquité tardive et humanisme: de Tertullien à Beatus Rhenanus: mélanges offerts à François Heim à l’occasion de son 70e anniversaire. Turnhout, 197–208.Google Scholar
Charlet, J-L. 2013. “Claudien chantre païen de Roma aeterna”, Κοινωνία 37: 255–269.Google Scholar
Chekin, L. S. 2006. Northern Eurasia in Medieval Cartography. Inventory, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Cheshire, K. A. 2008. “Kicking Φθόνος: Apollo and his chorus in Callimachus’ Hymn 2”, CP 103: 354–373.Google Scholar
Chevalier, J. 1915. Étude critique du dialogue pseudo-platonicien l’Axiochos. Paris.Google Scholar
Chevallier, R., ed. 1974. Littérature gréco-romaine et géographie historique. Mélanges offerts à Roger Dion. Paris.Google Scholar
Chiasson, C. 2001. “Scythian Androgyny and Environmental Determinism in Herodotus and the Hippocratic περὶ ἀέρων ὑδάτων τόπων”, Syllecta Classica 12: 33–73.Google Scholar
Chiekova, D. 2008. Cultes et vie religieuse des cités grecques du Pont Gauche (VIIe–Ier siècles avant J-C.). Bern.Google Scholar
Chiesa, I. 2011. Callimaco e l’Egitto. Testi e interpretazioni, diss. Milan.Google Scholar
Childs, W. A. P. 1993. “Herodotos, Archaic Chronology, and the Temple of Apollo at Delphi”, JDAI 108: 399–441.Google Scholar
Chinchilla Mazariegos, O. 2017. Art and Myth of the Ancient Maya. New Haven.Google Scholar
Chlup, R. 2000. “Plutarch’s Dualism and the Delphic Cult”, Phronesis 45: 138–158.Google Scholar
Chrimes, K. M. T. 1971. Ancient Sparta. Westport.Google Scholar
Christesen, P. 2005. “Imagining Olympia: Hippias of Elis and the First Olympic Victor List”, in Aubert, J.-J, Várhelyi, Z., ed., A Tall Order Writing the Social History of the Ancient World Essays in Honor of William V. Harris. Munich, 319–356.Google Scholar
Christiansen, P. G. 2009. “Claudian: The Last Great Pagan Poet”, L’Antiquité Classique 78: 133–144.Google Scholar
Cicciò, M. 1983. “Il santuario di Damia e Auxesia e il conflitto tra Atene ed Egina (Herod. V, 82–88)”, Contributi dell’Istituto di Storia antica dell’Università del Sacro Cuore 9: 95–104.Google Scholar
Claesen, M. 1938. “Le palmier, symbole d’Apollon”, Bulletin de l’Institut historique belge de Rome 19: 83–102.Google Scholar
Claeys, G., Tower Sargent, L., ed. 1999. The Utopia Reader. New York.Google Scholar
Clapp, E. B. 1913. “Two Pindaric Poems of Theocritus”, CP 8: 310–316.Google Scholar
Clare, R. J. 2002. The Path of the Argo: Language, Imagery and Narrative in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. 1999. Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cobet, J. 1988. “Herodot und mündliche Überlieferung”, in von Ungern-Sternberg, J., ed., Vergangenheit in mündlicher Überlieferung. Stuttgart, 226–234.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. P., ed. 2000. Signifying Identities: Anthropological Perspectives on Boundaries and Contested Value. London.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. 2004. Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. 2010. “‘I Know the Number of the Sand and the Measure of the Sea’: Geography and Difference in the Early Greek World”, Raaflaub, K. A., Talbert, J. A., ed., Geography and Ethnography: Perceptions of the World in Pre-Modern Societies. Chichester, 197–214.Google Scholar
Collard, H. 2016. Montrer l’invisible: rituel et présentification du divin dans l’imagerie attique. Liège.Google Scholar
Collard, H. 2019. “Distinguer un dieu d’un homme: l’anthropomorphisme des dieux d’Homère en images”, in Gagné, R. and Herrero de Jáuregui, M., ed., Les dieux d’Homère II. Anthropomorphismes. Paris, 113–134.Google Scholar
Colli, G. 1977. La sapienza greca. Vol. 1: Dioniso, Apollo, Eleusi, Orfeo, Museo, Iperborei, Enigma. Milan.Google Scholar
Colonia, R. 2006. The Archaeological Museum of Delphi. Athens.Google Scholar
Compatangelo-Soussignan, R. 2001. “Le rapt d’Oreithyia à Cales: un mythe national athénien ‘revisité’ en Campanie ?”, PP 56: 351–385.Google Scholar
Condello, F. 2007. “In dialogo con le Deliadi: testo e struttura tematica di H. Hom. Ap. 165–176”, Eikasmos 18: 33–57.Google Scholar
Conomis, N. 1961. “Notes on the Fragments of Lycurgus”, Klio 39: 140–148.Google Scholar
Conomis, N. 1970. Lycurgi Oratio in Leocratem cum Ceterarum Lycurgi Orationum Fragmentis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Constantakopoulou, C. 2007. The Dance of the Islands. Insularity, Networks, the Athenian Empire and the Aegean World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Constantakopoulou, C. 2010. “Anonymous, On Delos (De Delo, ex Lycurgo) (401 c)”, Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Constantakopoulou, C. 2016. “The Shaping of the Past: Local History and Fourth-Century Delian Reactions to Athenian Imperialism”, in Powell, A., and Meidani, K., ed. “The Eyesore of Aigina”. Anti-Athenian Attitudes in Greek, Hellenistic and Roman History. Swansea, 125–146.Google Scholar
Cook, A. B. 1925. Zeus: A Study in Ancient Religion, Vol. 2, Part 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cook, A. B. 1940. Zeus: A Study in Ancient Religion, Vol. 3, Part 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Coombe, C. 2018. Claudian the Poet. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. A. 1968. “The Temple of Apollo at Bassae. New Observations on its Plan and Orientation”, AJA 72: 103–111.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. A. 1978. The Temple of Apollo at Bassai. New York.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. A. 1996. The Temple of Apollo Bassitas. Vol. 1: The Architecture. Princeton.Google Scholar
Coppola, D. 2010. Anemoi: morfologia dei venti nell’immaginario della Grecia antica. Naples.Google Scholar
Corcella, A. 1984. Erodoto e l’analogia. Palermo.Google Scholar
Corcella, A. 2007. “Book IV”, in Murray, O. and Moreno, A., ed., A Commentary on Herodotus Books I–IV. Oxford, 543–721.Google Scholar
Cordena, F. 1997. “I mari degli Iperborei”, Miscellanea greca e romana: studi pubblicati dall’Istituto Italiano per la Storia Antica 21: 17–26.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1908. Microcosmographia Academica: Being a Guide for the Young Academic Politician. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1912. From Religion to Philosophy: A Study in the Origins of Western Speculation. London.Google Scholar
Corssen, P. 1912. “Der Abaris des Heraklides Ponticus”, RhM 67: 21–47.Google Scholar
Coscia, A. 2017. “L’antro sottoterra. Catabasi e riti di immortalizzazione da Pitagora ad Aristea di Proconneso”, in A. Maiuri, ed., Antrum. Riti e simbologie delle grotte nel Mediterraneo antico (Quaderni di Studi e Materiali di Storia delle Religioni 16), 127–172.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, D. 2001a. Apollo’s Eye: A Cartographic Genealogy of the Earth in the Western Imagination. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, D. 2001b. “Cosmology and Cosmography, 1450–1650”, in Belloli, J., ed., The Universe: A Convergence of Art, Music, and Science. Pasadena, 19–31.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, D. 2007. “Images of Renaissance Cosmography, 1450–1650”, in Woodward, D., ed., The History of Cartography, vol. 3, Cartography in the European Renaissance. Chicago, 55–98.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, D. 2008. Geography and Vision: Seeing, Imagining and Representing the World. London.Google Scholar
Coşkun, A., ed. 2021. Galatian Victories and Other Studies into the Agency and Identity of the Galatians in the Hellenistic and Early-Roman Periods. Leuven (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Costa, V. 2017. “Damastes of Sigeion (5)”, Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Coste, D., De Pietro, J-F., Moore, D. 2012. “Hymnes et le palimpseste de la compétence de communication. Tours, détours et retours en didactique des langues”, Langage et Société 139: 103–123.Google Scholar
Counillon, P. 2004. “La Périégèse de la terre habitée et l’Hymne à Délos de Callimaque”, REA 106: 187–202.Google Scholar
Courby, F. 1912. Exploration archéologique de Délos V. Le portique d’Antigone ou du nord-est et les constructions voisines. Paris.Google Scholar
Courby, F. 1931. Les temples d’Apollon. Paris.Google Scholar
Craft, P. 2014. “Peter Heylyn’s Seventeenth-Century English Worldview”, Studies in Medieval & Renaissance History 11: 325–344.Google Scholar
Crane, G. 1996. “The Prosperity of Tyrants: Bacchylides, Herodotus, and the Contest for Legitimacy”, Arethusa 29: 57–85Google Scholar
Creuzer, G. F. 1803. Die historische Kunst der Griechen in ihrer Entstehung und Fortbildung. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Croissant, F. 1980. “Les frontons du temple du IVᵉ siècle à Delphes. Premiers essais de restitutions”, Revue archéologique 1980: 172–179.Google Scholar
Croissant, F. 1986. “Les frontons du temple du IVᵉ siècle à Delphes; esquisse d’une restitution, II”, in Kyrieleis, E., ed., Archaische und klassische griechische Plastik. Mainz, 187–197.Google Scholar
Croissant, F. 1994. “Le Dionysos du fronton occidental de Delphes: histoire d’un faux problème”, BCH 118: 353–360.Google Scholar
Croissant, F. 2003. Les frontons du temple du IVe siècle. Athens.Google Scholar
Croissant, F. 2011. “Deux sculpteurs athéniens du milieu du IVe siècle: Praxias père et fils”, Revue archéologique 2: 309–322.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, J. 2005. Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters and Social Imagination. Vancouver.Google Scholar
Crusius, O. 1886–1890. “Hyperboreer”, Roscher 1.2. col. 2805–2835.Google Scholar
Cuartero i Borra, F. J. 1972. “La poética de Alcman”, Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Griegos e Indoeuropeos 4: 367–402.Google Scholar
Cuffari, G. 1983. I riferimenti poetici di Imerio. Palermo.Google Scholar
Culasso Gastaldi, E. 1986. “Temistocle, Eschilo, Simonide e il culto della vittoria”, in Corsini, E., ed., La polis e il suo teatro. Padova, 31–47.Google Scholar
Culianu, I. P. 1983. Psychanodia I. Leiden.Google Scholar
Cullyer, H. 2005. “A Wind that Blows from Thrace: Dionysus in the Fifth Stasimon of Sophocles’ Antigone”, The Classical World 99: 3–20.Google Scholar
Ćulumović, M. 2016. “Songs of Homecoming: Sites of Victories and Celebrations in Pindar’s Victory Odes”, in McInerney, J., Sluiter, I., ed., Valuing Landscape in Classical Antiquity: Natural Environment and Cultural Imagination. Leiden, 349–382.Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2005. Pindar and the Cult of Heroes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2012. “Pindar and Bacchylides”, in de Jong, I. J. F., ed., Space in Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Groningen, 285–303.Google Scholar
Currie, B. 2016. Homer’s Allusive Art. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cursaru, G. 2007. “‘On offre un sacrifice pour la glorieuse Panhellas’ (Pindare, Péan VI, 60): enjeux identitaires et portée panhellénique des Théoxénies delphiques”, CEA 44: 31–49.Google Scholar
Cursaru, G. 2010. “Létô à Délos, I. Le catalogue du voyage de Létô dans l’Hymne homérique à Apollon (v. 30–45)”, Les études classiques 78: 289–330.Google Scholar
Cursaru, G. 2012. “Létô à Délos, II. Ἐπὶ Δήλου ἐβήσετο πότνια Λητώ (HhAp. 49): significations du pas divin de Létô dans l’œuvre de fondation de Délos”, Les études classiques 80: 209–245.Google Scholar
Cursaru, G. 2019. Parcourir l’invisible. Les espaces insondables à travers les mouvements des dieux dans la pensée religieuse grecque de l’époque archaïque. Louvain.Google Scholar
Curtis, L. 2017. Imagining the Chorus in Augustan Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. 1999. La muse dans la bibliothèque. Réécriture et intertextualité dans la poésie alexandrine. Paris.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. 2003. “Les Phéaciens d’Homère à Apollonios de Rhodes”, Gaia 7: 379–386.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. 2018. “La présence de Delphes dans la poésie hellénistique”, in Luce, J-M, ed., Delphes et la littérature d’Homère à nos jours. Paris, 77–99.Google Scholar
Daebritz, R. 1916. “Hyperboreer”, RE 9.1. col. 258–279.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 1995. “Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini: (Parm. frr. 1+6 D-K.; Pind. Ol. VI 22–27; pae. VIIb 10–20)”, SIFC 13: 143–181.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 1997. Callimaco. Inni Epigrammi Ecale. Milan.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2004. “Textual Fluctuation and Cosmic Streams: Ocean and Acheloios”, JHS 124: 16–37.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2005. “Ordered from the Catalogue: Pindar, Bacchylides, and Hesiodic Genealogical Poetry”, in Hunter, R., ed., The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge, 217–238.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. 2009. “Reconstructing Pindar’s First Hymn: The Theban ‘Theogony’ and the Birth of Apollo”, in Athanassaki, L., Martin, R. P., Miller, J. F., ed., Apolline Politics and Poetics. Athens, 129–147.Google Scholar
Dan, A.-C. 2009. “La plus merveilleuse des mers”. Recherches sur la représentation de la Mer Noire et de ses peuples. Reims.Google Scholar
Dan, A.-C. 2012. “Quand Apollon portait en vol au-delà des Scythes”, Aristeas 6: 68–90.Google Scholar
Dan, A.-C. 2016. “The rivers called ‘Phasis’”, AWE 15: 245–277.Google Scholar
Dan, A.-C., Geus, K. 2020. “Weaving Landmarks in Common Sense Geography: Natural Numbers in Pseudo-Aristotle’s On the World”, in Geus, K., Thiering, M., ed., Common Sense Geography II. Landmarks and Cognitive Maps. Münster (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Dan, A.-C., Queyrel, F. 2017. “Les concepts en sciences de l’Antiquité. Mode d’emploi, réseaux, connectivité, graphes. 1. Les espaces, les rets et les rites. Introduction”, Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 43: 296–301.Google Scholar
Dana, D. 1998–2000. “Zalmoxis in Antonius Diogenes’ Wonders beyond Thule”, Studii Classice 34–36:79–135.Google Scholar
Dana, D. 2010. “Preuve et malentendu: sur le mythe historiographique de l’origine et de la transmission du chamanisme en Grèce ancienne”, in M. Vartejanu-Joubert, ed., La preuve en Histoire: controverses. Cahiers du Centre de Recherches Historiques 45: 109–128.Google Scholar
Dana, D. 2014. “L’élaboration d’une mémoire religieuse des Thraces, entre Anciens et Modernes”, in Barbu, D., Borgeaud, P., Lozat, M., Meylan, N., Rendu Loisel, A.-C, ed., Le savoir des religions. Fragments d’historiographie religieuse. Geneva, 499–538.Google Scholar
Dana, M. 2007. “Cultes locaux et identités grecques dans les cités du Pont-Euxin”, Les études classiques 75: 171–186.Google Scholar
Danvoye, S. 2007. “Contacts pacifiques et violents entre les Barbares et les Romains dans les panégyriques de Claudien”, Latomus 66: 132–149.Google Scholar
Daouti, P. 2016. “Homère chez Maxime de Tyr”, in Fauquier, F., Pérez-Jean, B., ed., Maxime de Tyr, entre rhétorique et philosophie au iie siècle de notre ère. Montpellier, 59–76.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1985. “Les logoi des autres”, QS 22: 105–128.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1987. Le discours du particulier. Essai sur l’Enquête hérodotéenne. Paris.Google Scholar
Darbo-Peschanski, C. 2007. L’Historia. Commencements grecs. Paris.Google Scholar
Daux, G. 1935. “Sur la loi amphictionique de 380 av. J.-C.”, Revue archéologique 5: 205–219.Google Scholar
Daux, G. 1936. Pausanias à Delphes. Paris.Google Scholar
Daux, G. 1941. “Y a-t-il un oracle à Telmessos de Carie?”, RPh 15: 11–18.Google Scholar
Daverio Rocchi, G. 1988. Frontiera e confini nella Grecia antica. Rome.Google Scholar
Daverio Rocchi, G. 2007. “Quindici anni di studi sulle frontiere della Grecia antica: alcune prospettive della ricerca”, in Fellmeth, U., Guyot, P., Sonnabend, H., ed., Historische Geographie der Alten Welt. Grundlagen, Erträge, Perspektiven. Hildesheim, 87–105.Google Scholar
Daverio Rocchi, G. 2008. “Confini e frontiere della polis: spazio di vita e categorie geografiche”, Geographia Antiqua 18: 47–61.Google Scholar
Davids, K. 1998. “Cartography and Navigation in the North Atlantic in the Late 16th and Early 17th Centuries: A Comparison of England and the Northern Netherlands”, Proceedings International Willem Barentsz Symposium. Terschelling, 48–52.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. 2005. The Idea of North. London.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 1988. Epicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 2014. The Theban Epics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Davis, J. L., Chouinard, J. B. 2016. “Theorizing Affordances: From Request to Refuse”, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 36: 241–248.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, D. 2008. “La geografia mitica del Catalogo: Europa e Fineo”, in Bastianini, G., Casanova, A., ed., Esiodo: cent’anni di papiri. Florence, 129–151.Google Scholar
De Siena, A. 1998. Siritide e Metapontino. Storie di due territori coloniali. Naples.Google Scholar
Decourt, J.-C., Tziaphalias, A. 2015. “Un règlement religieux de la région de Larissa: cultes grecs et ‘orientaux’”, Kernos 28: 13–51.Google Scholar
Deforge, B. 1988. “Eschyle et la terre divine”, in Jouan, F., Deforge, B. B., ed., Peuples et pays mythiques. Paris, 123–132.Google Scholar
Defradas, J. 1954. Les thèmes de la propagande delphique. Paris.Google Scholar
De Heer, C. 1969. Makar–Eudaimon–Olbios–Eutuches: A Study of the Semantic Field Denoting Happiness in Ancient Greek to the End of the Fifth Century BC. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 1999. “Aspects narratologiques des ‘Histoires’ d’Hérodote”, Lalies 19: 217–275.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2002. “Narrative Unity and Units”, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H., ed., Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden, 245–266.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2004. “Herodotus”, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., Bowie, A., A., ed., Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Leiden, 101–114.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2012. “Homeric Hymns”, in de Jong, I. J. F., ed., Space in Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative. Groningen, 39–53.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2018. “The View from the Mountain (Oroskopia) in Greek and Latin Literature”, CCJ 64: 23–48.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. F. 2019. “From Oroskopia to Ouranoskopia in Greek and Latin Epic”, Symbolae Osloenses 92: 1–25.Google Scholar
de Meer, S. 2012. Atlas of the World: Gerard Mercator’s Map of the World (1569). Zutphen.Google Scholar
Delattre, C. 2010. “Introduction”, in Auger, D., Delattre, C., eds., Mythe et fiction. Paris, 11–19.Google Scholar
Delattre, C. 2017. “Récit mythographique et intrigues. Le cas d’Antoninus Liberalis”, in Alganza Roldán, M., Papadopoulou, P., Melero Bellido, A., ed., La mitología griega en la tradición literaria: de la Antigüedad a la Grecia contemporánea. Granada, 99–120.Google Scholar
Delcourt, M. 1938. Stérilités mystérieuses et naissances maléfiques dans l’Antiquité classique. Liège.Google Scholar
Delcourt, M. 1955. L’oracle de Delphes. Paris.Google Scholar
Della Corte, F. 1987. “Orazio e i grandi dannati”, Maia 39: 89–93.Google Scholar
Demars, I., Maloney, G. 2009. Une leçon d’Hippocrate: la santé dans un environnement nordique. Québec.Google Scholar
Demont, P. 2009. “Figures of Inquiry in Herodotus’ Inquiries”, Mnemosyne 62: 179–205.Google Scholar
Déniz, A. A. 2020. “Les ânes chez Ulysse: à propos du sens et de l’étymologie de grec ancien μύκλος (Lycophron, Alexandra 771 et 816)”, Philologus 164: 107–132.Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. 1954. The Greek Particles. Oxford.Google Scholar
Depew, M. 1998. “Delian Hymns and Callimachean Allusion”, HSCP 98: 155–182.Google Scholar
D’Ercole, M. C. 2009. “Arimaspes et griffons: de la mer Noire à l’Adriatique via Athènes”, Métis 7: 203–225.Google Scholar
Derow, P. S., Forrest, W. G. 1982. “An Inscription from Chios”, ABSA 77: 79–92.Google Scholar
Desautels, J. 1971. “Les monts Riphées et les Hyperboréens dans le traité hippocratique: Des airs, des eaux et des lieux”, REG 84: 289–296.Google Scholar
Des Bouvrie, S. 2002. “The Definition of Myth: Symbolic Phenomena in Ancient Culture”, in Des Bouvrie, S., ed., Myth and Symbol. 1: Symbolic Phenomena in Ancient Greek Culture. Sävedalen, 11–69.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 2005. Par-delà nature et culture. Paris.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 2010. “Cognition, Perception and Worlding”, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 35: 334–340.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 2014a. La composition des mondes. Paris.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 2014b. “Modes of Being and Forms of Predication”, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4: 271–280.Google Scholar
Descola, P. 2018. “Anthropological Comparatisms: Generalisation, Symmetrisation, Bifurcation”, in Gagné, R., Goldhill, S., Lloyd, G. E. R., ed., Regimes of Comparatism: Frameworks of Comparison in History, Religion and Anthropology. Leiden, 402–417.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1967. Les maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque. Paris.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1973. “L’olivier: un mythe politico-religieux”, in Finley, M. I., ed., Problèmes de la terre en Grèce ancienne. Paris, 293–306.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1986a. Dionysos à ciel ouvert. Paris.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1986b. “Apollon und Dionysos in der griechischen Religion”, in Faber, F., Schlesier, R., ed., Die Restauration der Götter. Antike Religion und Neo-Paganismus. Würzburg, 124–131.Google Scholar
Detienne, M., ed. 1990a. Tracés de fondation. Louvain.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1990b. “Qu’est-ce qu’un site?”, in Detienne, M., ed., Tracés de fondation. Louvain, 1–16.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1990c. “Apollon Archégète. Un modèle politique de la territorialisation”, in Detienne, M., ed., Tracés de fondation. Louvain, 301–311.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 2001. “Forgetting Delphi between Apollo and Dionysus”, CP 96: 147–158.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 2005. Les Grecs et nous. Une anthropologie comparée de la Grèce ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 2007 [1989]. Les dieux d’Orphée, 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 2009. Apollon le couteau à la main. Une approche expérimentale du polythéisme grec. Paris.Google Scholar
Dettori, E. 2005. “Aristea ‘corvo’ e ‘sciamano’ (?): (Herodot. 4.15)”, Seminari Romani di Cultura Greca 9: 87–103.Google Scholar
Dettori, E. 2006. “Il ‘settimo anno’ di Aristea in Erodoto 4. 14”, Giornale Italiano di Filologia 58: 283–285.Google Scholar
Deubner, L. 1932. Attische Feste. Berlin.Google Scholar
Deubner, O. R. 1979. “Boreas und Oreithyia. Eine attische Figurenlekythos”, Boreas 2: 53–58.Google Scholar
Devereux, G. 1965. “The Kolaxaian Horse of Alkman’s Partheneion”, CQ 15: 176–184.Google Scholar
Devereux, G. 1966a. “The Exploitation of Ambiguity in Pindar O. 3.27”, RhM 109: 289–298.Google Scholar
Devereux, G. 1966b. “The Enetian Horse of Alkman’s Partheneion”, Hermes 94: 129–134.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 1987. “Narrative Surface and Authorial Voice in Herodotus’ Histories”, Arethusa 20: 147–170.Google Scholar
Dewald, C. 2002. “‘I Didn’t Give My Genealogy’: Herodotus and the Authorial Persona”, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I., van Wees, H., ed., Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden, 267–289.Google Scholar
DeWeese, D. 1978–1979. “The Influence of the Mongols on the Religious Consciousness of Thirteenth Century Europe”, Mongolian Studies 5: 41–78.Google Scholar
de Pina-Cabral, J. 2017. World: An Anthropological Exploration. Chicago.Google Scholar
D’Hautcourt, S. 2008. “Amometos (645)”, Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Díaz, A. 2011. Las formas del tiempo. Tradiciones cosmográficas en los calendarios indígenas del México Central, diss., UNAM.Google Scholar
Díaz, A., ed. 2020a. Reshaping the World: Debates on Mesoamerican Cosmologies. Louisville.Google Scholar
Díaz, A. 2020b. “Dissecting the Sky: Discursive Translations in Mexican Colonial Cosmographies”, in Díaz, A., ed., Reshaping the World: Debates on Mesoamerican Cosmologies. Louisville, 100–138.Google Scholar
Diehl, E. 1953. “Pontarches 2”, RE XXII. col. 1–18.Google Scholar
Dietrich, N. 2018a. “Viewing and Identification: The Agency of the Viewer in Archaic and Early Classical Greek Visual Culture”, in Kampakoglo, A., Novokhatko, A., ed., Gaze, Vision and Visuality. Berlin, 464–492.Google Scholar
Dietrich, N. 2018b. Das Attribut als Problem. Eine bildwissenschaftliche Untersuchung zur griechischen Kunst. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dietz, G. 1971. “Das Bett des Odysseus”, Symbolon. Jahrbuch der Symbolforschung 7: 9–32.Google Scholar
Di Brazzano, S. 2000. “La Bibbia e la biblioteca dell’autore della Cosmographia del cosiddetto Etico Istro”, in Bratož, R., Slovenija in sosednje dežele med antiko in karolinško dobo: Začetki slovenske etnogeneze. Ljubljana, 749–785.Google Scholar
Di Filippo Balestrazzi, E. 1980–1981. “L’agyieus e la città”, Atti del Centro ricerche e documentazione sull’antichità classica 11: 93–108.Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, L. 2008. “Sui frammenti di Simia di Rodi, poeta alessandrino”, Aevum 82: 51–117.Google Scholar
Dilke, O. A. W. 1984. “Geographical Perceptions of the North in Pomponius Mela and Ptolemy”, Arctic 37: 347–351.Google Scholar
Dillemann, L. 1997. La Cosmographie du Ravennate. Brussels.Google Scholar
Dillery, J. 1998. “Hecataeus of Abdera: Hyperboreans, Egypt, and the interpretatio Graeca”, Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 47: 255–275.Google Scholar
Dimauro, E. 2014. “Pausania e il lavoro sul campo: il caso dell’attacco celtico a Delfi”, Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medioevale 56: 331–358.Google Scholar
Dion, R. 1968. “Le Danube d’Hérodote”, RPh 42: 7–41.Google Scholar
Dion, R. 1976. “La notion d’Hyperboréens: ses vicissitudes au cours de l’antiquité”, Bulletin de l’association G. Budé 4th series, n. 2: 143–157.Google Scholar
Dion, R. 1977. Aspects politiques de la géographie antique. Paris.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1951. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Doležel, L. 1976a. “Extensional and Intensional Narrative Worlds”, Poetics 8: 193–212.Google Scholar
Doležel, L. 1976b. “Narrative Modalities”, Journal of Literary Semantics 5: 5–14.Google Scholar
Doležel, L. 1998a. Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Doležel, L. 1998b. “Possible Worlds of Fiction and History”, New Literary History 29: 785–809.Google Scholar
Donnan, H., Wilson, T. M., ed. 1999. Borders: Frontiers of Identity, Nation and State. Oxford.Google Scholar
Donnellan, L. 2012. “Apollo Mediating Identities in Ancient Greek Sicily”, BABESCH 87: 173–186.Google Scholar
Donnellan, L. 2015. “Oikist and Archegetes in Context: Representing the Foundation of Sicilian Naxos”, in Mac Sweeney, N., ed., Foundation Myths in Ancient Societies: Dialogues and Discourses. Philadelphia, 41–70.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 2006. “Le traité Sur le sommeil de Cléarque de Soles: catalepsie et l’immortalité de l’âme”, Exemplaria Classica: Revista de Filología Clásica 10: 31–52.Google Scholar
Dorati, M. 1999–2000. “Le testimonianze relative alla περίοδος γῆς di Ecateo”, Geographia Antica 8–9:120–127.Google Scholar
Dorati, M. 2000. Le Storie di Erodoto: etnografia e racconto. Pisa.Google Scholar
Dorati, M. 2011. “Travel Writing, Ethnographical Writing, and the Representation of the Edges of the World in Herodotus”, in Rollinger, R., Truschnegg, B., Bichler, R., ed., Herodot und das Persische Weltreich. Wiesbaden, 273–312.Google Scholar
Dorati, M. 2014–2015. “Spazio dell’esperienza e spazio dell’astrazione nel discorso geoetnografico erodoteo: alcune considerazioni narratologiche”, Geographia Antiqua 23–24: 43–52.Google Scholar
Dörig, J. 1967. “Lesefrüchte: I. Der Panzer von Olympia. II. Der Westgiebel des Apollontempels zu Delphi. II. Der Ostgiebel des Apollontempels zu Delphi”, in Rohde-Liegle, M., Cahn, H. A., Ackermann, H. C., ed., Gestalt und Geschichte. Festschrift Karl Schefold. Bern, 102–109.Google Scholar
Döring, J., Thielmann, T., ed. 2008. Spatial Turn. Das Raumparadigma in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften. Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Dörner, F. K., Hoepfner, W. 1989. “Das Eiland Thynias-Apollonia”, Istanbuler Mitteilungen 39: 103–106.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. 1993. The Poetics of Colonization: From City to Text in Archaic Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 1970. Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1993. Aristophanes. Frogs. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dover, P. 2014. “How Heinrich Bullinger Read His Solinus: Reading Ancient Geography in 16th-Century Switzerland”, in Brodersen, K., ed., Solinus: New Studies. Heidelberg, 171–194.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1979. “Apollon et l’esprit dans la machine: origines”, REG 92: 293–318.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1980. “Deux notes sur les Scythes et les Arimaspes”, REG 93: 486–492.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 1996. “Homer’s Sense of Text”, JHS 116: 47–61.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2011. “Appendix on Skythia (845)”, Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2013. “Poseidonios (87)”, Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2018. “Abaris (34)”, 2nd ed., Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. 2019. “Aristeas (35)”, 2nd ed., Brill’s New Jacoby. Leiden.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. 1972. Herodot-Studien. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Dubois, L. 1996. Inscriptions grecques dialectales d’Olbia du Pont. Geneva.Google Scholar
DuBois, P. 2006. “The History of the Impossible: Ancient Utopia”, CP 101: 1–14.Google Scholar
Dubuisson, D. 1998. L’Occident et la religion. Mythes, science et idéologie. Brussels.Google Scholar
Duchemin, J. 1955. Pindare: poète et prophète. Paris.Google Scholar
Duchemin, J. 1979. “La justice de Zeus et le destin d’Io. Regard sur les sources proche-orientales d’un mythe eschyléen”, REG 92: 1–54.Google Scholar
Dugas, C. 1956. “Observations sur la légende de Persée”, REG 69: 1–15.Google Scholar
Dugast, S., Jaillard, D., Manfrini, I., ed. 2021. Agalma ou les figurations de l’invisible. Approches comparées. Grenoble (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Dumézil, G. 1978. Romans de Scythie et d’alentour. Paris.Google Scholar
Dupré, S. 2009. “Early Modern Cosmography”, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences 59: 419–422.Google Scholar
Durán, M., Pòrtulas, J. 1995. “Preliminars per a una discussió sobre Olè de Lícia”, Anuari de Filologia. Secció D, Studia Graeca et Latina 18: 63–73.Google Scholar
Durand, J.-L. 1984. “Le faire et le dire. Vers une anthropologie des gestes iconiques”, History and Anthropology 1: 29–48 = Images Re-vues 16, 2019 (online).Google Scholar
Durand, J.-L. 1990. “Formules attiques du fonder”, in Detienne, M., ed., Tracés de fondation. Louvain, 271–287.Google Scholar
Dyck, K. 2016. Reichsrock: The International Web of White-Power and Neo-Nazi Hate Music. Rutgers.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. 1967. “Oedipus and Polyneices”, PCPS 13: 1–13.Google Scholar
Eastwood, B. S. 1968. “Mediaeval Empiricism: The Case of Grosseteste’s Optics”, Speculum 43: 114–117.Google Scholar
Ebner, S. 2004. “La critica ai geografi ionici e il falso progresso di Erodoto”, in Medaglia, S. M., ed., Miscellanea in ricordo di Angelo Raffaele Sodano. Naples, 187–198.Google Scholar
Eck, D. 1985. Darsan: Seeing the Divine Image in India, 2nd ed. Chambersburg, PA.Google Scholar
Eck, D. 2012. India: A Sacred Geography. New York.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. 2013. “The Landscape and Heritage of Pindar’s Olympia”, CW 107: 3–33.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. 2014. “Pindar’s Delphi”, in Gilhuly, K. and Worman, N., Space, Place, and Landscape in Ancient Greek Literature and Culture. Cambridge, 21–62.Google Scholar
Eckerman, C. 2018. “The Dioscuri and the agōn at Pindar’s Olympian 3.36”, RhM 161: 109–111.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1984. The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 2015 [2013].