Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:34:38.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Helping staff help a “hateful” patient: the case of TJ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Paul J. Ford
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Denise M. Dudzinski
Affiliation:
University of Washington School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Case narrative

“Ted Jacob,” or “TJ,” was a patient who, we quickly learned, tested the ethical resilience of most of the health professionals who worked with him. He expanded our awareness of the types of conflicts that can be generated among the principles of nonmaleficence, beneficence, respect for persons, and autonomy.

TJ was 36 years old when the attending psychiatrist (KSW) on the consultation–liaison (C-L) psychiatry service first saw him. Both authors had heard about TJ from numerous health professionals because of the enormous problems he created on each admission. TJ, diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD), characterized by intense emotional relationships, frequent crises resulting in suicidal ideation, and impulsive behavior, had been physically and sexually abused by his adoptive mother and ignored by an emotionally unavailable father. Beginning at age 11, he had numerous psychiatric admissions for attempted suicide and polysubstance abuse. His longest period of sobriety was during a marriage that lasted several years. TJ attended college for three years and majored in psychology. By history, he was bisexual, although his only known homosexual relationship was with his sponsor from Alcoholics Anonymous.

TJ had ten admissions for intentional drug overdoses and alcohol withdrawal within 12 months. He was first labeled a “hateful patient” when he was admitted to the hospital after telling his outpatient psychiatrist that he had eaten multiple boxes of rat poison with the intention of killing himself. Many more admissions due to sequelae of rat poison ingestion would follow.

Type
Chapter
Information
Complex Ethics Consultations
Cases that Haunt Us
, pp. 75 - 80
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×