Bibliography

Abel, Richard. French Film Theory and Criticism: A History/Anthology 1907–1939. Vol. 1: 1907–1929. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1988.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Ada. “What Renders Daumier’s Art So Cinematic for Eisenstein?” In Eisenstein, Notes for a General History of Cinema. 255–265 and 487–488.Google Scholar

Adam, Hans Christian (ed.). Eadweard Muybridge: The Human and Animal Locomotion Photographs. Cologne: Taschen. 2010. Rpt. 2014.Google Scholar

Adam, James. The Republic of Plato: Edited with Critical Notes, Commentary and Appendices. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1902. 2nd ed., 1963.Google Scholar

Agel, Henri. “L’Odyssée et le pré-cinéma.” L’Age nouveau, 14 no. 109 (April–June 1960). 60–64.Google Scholar

Agel, Jerome (ed.). The Making of Kubrick’s 2001. New York: Signet. 1970.Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick. “Homer, Vergil, and Complex Narrative Structures: An Essay.” Illinois Classical Studies, 14 (1989). 1–31.Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick. Sophocles’ Oedipus: Evidence and Self-Conviction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1991.Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick. Two Faces of Oedipus: Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus and Seneca’s Oedipus. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 2008.Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick, and Roisman, Hanna. The Odyssey Re-formed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1996.Google Scholar

Akçay, K. Nilüfer. Porphyry’s On the Cave of the Nymphs in Its Intellectual Context. Leiden: Brill. 2019.Google Scholar

Albera, François. “Introduction.” In Eisenstein, S. M, Cinématisme: Peinture et cinéma: Textes inédits. Tr. Anne Zouboff. Brussels: Éditions Complexe. 1980. 7–12. New ed. Dijon: Les Presses du Réel / Paris: Kargo. 2009. 7–12.Google Scholar

Albera, François. “Pierre Francastel, le cinéma et la filmologie.” Cinémas, 19 nos. 2–3 (2009). 287–316.Google Scholar

Albéra, François, Braun, Marta, and Gaudreault, André (eds.). Arrêt sur l’image, fragmentation du temps / Stop Motion, Fragmentation of Time. Lausanne: Payot. 2002.Google Scholar

Alberti, Leon Battista. On Painting. Tr. John R. Spencer. Rev. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1966.Google Scholar

Albrecht, Michael von. Ovid: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Reclam. 2003.Google Scholar

Alden, Maureen. Homer Beside Himself: Para-Narratives in the Iliad. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000.Google Scholar

Alexander, L. A. Fictional Worlds: Traditions in Narrative and the Age of Visual Culture. Brooklyn. 2013.Google Scholar

Alexandre, Sandrine, Philippe, Nora, and Ribeyrol, Charlotte (eds.). Inventer la peinture grecque antique. Lyon: ENS. 2011.Google Scholar

Allan, Rutger J., de Jonge, Irene J. F., and de Jonge, Casper C.. “From Enargeia to Immersion: The Ancient Roots of a Modern Concept.” Style, 51 (2017). 34–51.Google Scholar

Allen, Graham. “The Alien World of Objects: Stanley Kubrick’s The Killing.” In Cronin, Bernadette, MagShamhráin, Rachel, and Preuschoff, Nikolai (eds.). Adaptation Considered as a Collaborative Art: Process and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2020. 107–123.Google Scholar

Allen, Richard. Projecting Illusion: Film Spectatorship and the Impression of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1995. Rpt. 1997.Google Scholar

Allert, Beate I. G. E. Lessing: Poetic Constellations between the Visual and the Verbal. Heidelberg: Synchron. 2018.Google Scholar

Andersen, Nathan. Shadow Philosophy: Plato’s Cave and Cinema. New York: Routledge. 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Joseph and Barbara, . “Motion Perception in Motion Pictures.” In de Lauretis and Heath (eds.), The Cinematic Apparatus. 76–95.Google Scholar

Anderson, Miranda, Cairns, Douglas, and Sprevack, Mark (eds.). Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2019.Google Scholar

Andreae, Bernard. Antike Bildmosaiken. 2nd ed. Darmstadt: von Zabern. 2012.Google Scholar

Andrew, Dudley. André Bazin. Rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press. 2013.Google Scholar

Andrew, J. Dudley. The Major Film Theories: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1976. Rpt. 1979.Google Scholar

“Animating Antiquity: An Interview with Classical Scholar Sonya Nevin and Animator Steve K. Simons.” thersites, 3 (2016). 37–48.Google Scholar

Annas, Julia. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1981. Rpt. 1992.Google Scholar

Antonioni, Michelangelo. “Preface to Six Films.” Tr. Allison Cooper. In Antonioni, The Architecture of Vision: Writings and Interviews on Cinema. Ed. Carlo, Carlo di and Tinazzi, Giorgio; US ed. Marga Cottino-Jones. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2007. 57–68. Originally 1996.Google Scholar

Antonioni, Michelangelo. Sei film. Turin: Einaudi. 1964.Google Scholar

Apkon, Stephen. The Age of the Image: Redefining Literacy in a World of Screens. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux. 2013.Google Scholar

Ardagh, John. “Improving Euripides?” The Observer (April 14, 1963): Weekend Review. 21.Google Scholar

Arias, P. E. A History of a 1000 Years of Greek Vase Painting. Tr. and rev. Brian Shefton. New York: Abrams. 1961.Google Scholar

Arnheim, Rudolf. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1954. Expanded ed., 1974. Rpt. 2004.Google Scholar

Arnheim, Rudolf. “The Thoughts That Made the Picture Move.” In Arnheim, Film as Art. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1957. New ed., 1968. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Arnott, Peter D. Plays without People: Puppetry and Serious Drama. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1964.Google Scholar

Aronson, Linda. Screenwriting Updated: New (and Conventional) Ways of Writing for the Screen. Los Angeles: Silman-James. 2001.Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, William. “Film as Educator.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 3 no. 3 (1969). 75–83.Google Scholar

Astley, Neil (ed.). Tony Harrison. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Bloodaxe Books. 1991.Google Scholar

Auden, W. H. “The Guilty Vicarage.” Harper’s Magazine (May 1948). 406–412.Google Scholar

Auffarth, Christoph. Der drohende Untergang: “Schöpfung” in Mythos und Ritual im alten Orient und in Griechenland am Beispiel der Odyssee und des Ezechielbuches. Berlin: De Gruyter. 1991.Google Scholar

Aumont, Jacques. À quois pensent les filmes. Paris: Séguier. 1996.Google Scholar

Aumont, Jacques. The Image. Tr. Claire Pajackowska. London: British Film Institute. 1997.Google Scholar

Aumont, Jacques. Montage Eisenstein. Tr. Lee Hildreth, Constance Penley, and Andrew Ross. London: British Film Institute / Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1987.Google Scholar

Aumont, Jacques. “Mon très cher objet.” Trafic, 6 (Spring, 1993). 53–69.Google Scholar

Aumont, Jacques. L’oeil interminable: Cinéma et peinture. Paris: Séguer. 1989. 2nd ed.: L’oeil interminable. Paris: La Différence. 2007.Google Scholar

Aumont, Jacques. Les théories des cinéastes. Paris: Nathan. 2002. Rpt. 2004.Google Scholar

Aumont, Jacques. “The Variable Eye, or the Mobilization of the Gaze.” Tr. Charles O’Brien and Sally Shafto. In Andrew, Dudley (ed.). The Image in Dispute: Art and Cinema in the Age of Photography. Austin: University of Texas Press. 1997. 231–258.Google Scholar

Babbitt, Frank Cole (ed. and tr.). Plutarch’s Moralia in Fourteen Volumes. Vol. 1: 1A–86A. London: Heinemann / New York: Putnam’s. 1928. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Babbitt, Irving. The New Laokoon: An Essay on the Confusion of the Arts. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1910.Google Scholar

Babin, Gustave. “The Making of Moving Pictures: How Their Effects Are Obtained.” Scientific American Supplement, 1697 (July 11, 1908). 24–26 / 1698 (July 18, 1908). 40–42.Google Scholar

Babin, Gustave. “Le théâtre cinématographique.” L’Illustration, 3427 (October 31, 1908). 286–289.Google Scholar

Bachmann, Cordula. Wenn man die Welt als Gemälde betrachtet: Studien zu den Eikones Philostrats des Älteren. Heidelberg: Verlag Antike. 2015.Google Scholar

Badiou, Alain. Cinema. Ed. de Becque, Antoine. Tr. Susan Spitzer. Cambridge: Polity. 2013.Google Scholar

Baier, Wolfgang. A Source Book of Photographic History / Quellendarstellungen zur Geschichte der Fotografie. Halle: VEB Fotokinoverlag / London and New York: The Focal Press. 1965.Google Scholar

Bailey, Cyril. The Greek Atomists and Epicurus: A Study. New York: Russell and Russell. 1964. Originally 1928.Google Scholar

Bailey, Cyril (ed., tr., comm.). Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex. 3 vols., cont. pag. Corr. rpt. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1949. Several rpts. Originally 1947.Google Scholar

Bainbridge, John. Garbo. 2nd ed. New York: Galahad Books. 1971. Rpt. 1975.Google Scholar

Balázs, Béla. Theory of the Film (Character and Growth of a New Art). Tr. Edith Bone. New York: Arno Press and New York Times. 1972. Originally 1952.Google Scholar

Ball, Matthew. The Metaverse: And How It Will Revolutionize Everything. New York: Liveright. 2022.Google Scholar

Barberà, Pau [Pablo] Gilabert. “The Conformist by Bernardo Bertolucci: Alberto Moravia + Plato against Fascism.” Annali Online di Ferrara–Lettere, 7 no. 2 (2012). 142–160.Google Scholar

Barlow, Shirley A. The Imagery of Euripides: A Study in the Dramatic Use of Pictorial Language. 3rd ed. London: Bristol Classical Press / Duckworth. 2008.Google Scholar

Barner, Wilfried (ed.). Gotthold Ephraim Lessing: Werke und Briefe. Vol. 5.2: Werke 1766–1769: Laokoon/Briefe, antiquarischen Inhalts. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag. 1990. Rpt. 2007.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. The Presocratic Philosophers. Rev. ed. London: Routledge. 1982.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1984. 6th, corr., printing, 1995.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. Vol. 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1982. Corr. rpt., 1995.Google Scholar

Barreau, Hervé. “Bergson et Zénon d’Élée.” Revue philosophique de Louvain, 67 (1969). 267–284 and 389–430.Google Scholar

Barringer, Judith M., and Lissarague, François (eds.). Images at the Crossroads: Media and Meaning in Greek Art. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2022.Google Scholar

Barry, Richard. “Five Dollar ‘Movies’ Prophesied.” The New York Times (March 28, 1915). 16.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. “Diderot, Brecht, Eisenstein.” In Barthes, Image – Music – Text. 69–78.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. “The Face of Garbo.” In Barthes, Mythologies. Tr. Annette Lavers. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux. 1990. 56–57. Originally 1972.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. Image – Music – Text. Ed. and tr. Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang. 1977. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. “Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives.” In Barthes, Image – Music – Text. 79–124.Google Scholar

Bates, H. E. The Modern Short Story: A Critical Survey. London: Nelson. 1941. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Baudrillard, Jean. “Simulacra and Simulations.” Tr. Paul Foss, Paul Patton, and Philip Beitchman. In Baudrillard, Selected Writings. Ed. Poster, Mark. 2nd ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2001. 169–187.Google Scholar

Baudry, Jean-Louis. “The Apparatus: Metapsychological Approaches to the Impression of Reality in the Cinema.” Tr. Jean Andrews and Bertrand Augst. Camera Obscura, 1 no. 1 (1976). 104–126 (as “The Apparatus”). Rpt. in Rosen, Philip (ed.). Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader. New York: Columbia University Press. 1986. 299–318.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. André Bazin on Adaptation: Cinema’s Literary Imagination. Ed. Andrew, Dudley. Tr. Deborah Glassman and Nataša Ďurovičová [and Hugh Gray]. Oakland: University of California Press. 2022.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. André Bazin’s New Media. Ed. and tr. Dudley Andrew. Oakland: University of California Press. 2014.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. Bazin at Work: Major Essays and Reviews from the Forties and Fifties. Ed. Cardullo, Bert. Tr. Alain Piette and Bert Cardullo. London: Routledge, 1997. Rpt. 2014.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “A Bergsonian Film: The Picasso Mystery.” In Bazin, Bazin at Work. 211–219.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “For an Impure Cinema: In Defense of Adaptation.” In Bazin, What Is Cinema? Tr. Timothy Barnard. Montreal: Caboose. 2009. 107–137.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “In Defense of Mixed Cinema.” In Bazin, André Bazin on Adaptation. 354–379.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “La Strada.” In Bazin, Bazin at Work. 113–120.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “Mina de Vanghel: More Stendhalian than Stendhal.” In Bazin, André Bazin on Adaptation. 152–158.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “The Myth of Total Cinema.” In Bazin, , What Is Cinema? Vol. 1. 17–22.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “The Ontology of the Photographic Image.” In Bazin, , What Is Cinema? Vol. 1. 9–16.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “Stendhal’s Mina de Vanghel, Captured Beyond Fidelity.” In Bazin, André Bazin on Adaptation. 147–151.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “The Trial of CinemaScope: It Didn’t Kill the Close-Up.” In Bazin, André Bazin’s New Media. 294–298.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. What Is Cinema? New ed. Ed. and tr. Gray, Hugh. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2005. Originally 1967.Google Scholar

Bazin, André. “You Can Now ‘Descend into Yourself.’” In Bazin, André Bazin’s New Media. 119–120.Google Scholar

Beazley, J. D. Attic Red-Figure Vase-Painters. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1963.Google Scholar

Becker, Andrew Sprague. The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. 1995.Google Scholar

Beckmann, Martin. The Column of Marcus Aurelius: The Genesis and Meaning of a Roman Imperial Monument. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 2011. Rpt. 2021.Google Scholar

Behlmer, Rudy (ed.). Henry Hathaway: A Directors Guild of America Oral History. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. 2001.Google Scholar

Belfiore, Elizabeth. Tragic Pleasures: Aristotle on Plot and Emotion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1992.Google Scholar

Bell, Julian. “A Kinetic Endlessness.” The New York Review (February 24, 2022). 8 and 10.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, Thomas. “La Matrice ou la caverne?” In During, Matrix: Machine philosophique. 49–59.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Benjamin, Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. Ed. Arendt, Hannah. Tr. Harry Zohn. New ed. New York: Schocken. 1969. Rpt. 2007. 217–251.Google Scholar

Bennett, Colin N. et al. The Handbook of Kinematography: The History, Theory, and Practice of Motion Photography and Projection. London: The Kinematograph Weekly. 1911.Google Scholar

Benson, Michael. Space Odyssey: Stanley Kubrick, Arthur C. Clarke, and the Making of a Masterpiece. New York: Simon & Schuster. 2018.Google Scholar

Bentley, Paul. “Political Catharsis? The Example of Harrison.” In Byrne (ed.), Tony Harrison and the Classics. 267–283.Google Scholar

Bérard, Jean. “Le concours de l’arc dans l’‘Odyssée’.” Révue des études grecques, 68 fasc. 319–323 (1955). 1–11.Google Scholar

Berger, John. “A Man Begging in the Métro: Henri Cartier-Bresson.” In Berger, Understanding a Photograph. Ed. Dyer, Geoff. New York: Aperture. 2013. 112–116.Google Scholar

Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. London: BBC / Penguin. 1972. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Bergman, Ingmar. Images: My Life in Film. Tr. Marianne Ruuth. New York: Arcade. 1994.Google Scholar

Bergren, Ann L. T. “Helen’s Web: Time and Tableau in the Iliad.” Helios, n.s. 7 (1980). 19–34.Google Scholar

Bergren, Ann L. T. “Odyssean Temporality: Many (Re)Turns.” In Rubino, Carl and Shelmerdine, Cynthia W (eds.). Approaches to Homer. Austin: University of Texas Press. 1983. Rpt. 2011. 38–73.Google Scholar

Bergren, Ann. Weaving Truth: Essays on Language and the Female in Greek Thought. Washington, dc: Center for Hellenic Studies / Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 2008.Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. Tr. Arthur Mitchell. New York: Holt. 1911. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. Histoire de l’idée de temps: Cours au Collège de France 1902–1903. Ed. Riquier, Camille. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. 2016.Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. Mind and Matter. Tr. Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer. London: Allen / New York: Macmillan. 1911. Several rpts.Google Scholar

“Bernardo Bertolucci Seminar.” In Reed, Rochelle (ed.). The American Film Institute: Dialogue on Film, 3 no. 5: Fritz Lang / Bernardo Bertolucci (April 1974). 14–28.Google Scholar

Bernays, Jacob. Grundzüge der verlorenen Abhandlung des Aristoteles über Wirkung der Tragödie. Breslau: Trewendt. 1857.Google Scholar

Berry, David M. et al. New Aesthetics, New Anxieties. 2012. http://v2.nl/files/2012/publishing/new-aesthetic-new-anxieties-pdf/view.Google Scholar

Beshty, Walead (ed.). Picture Industry: A Provisional History of the Technical Image 1844–2018. Arles: LUMA. 2018.Google Scholar

Bettini, Maurizio. The Portrait of the Lover. Tr. Laura Gibbs. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beuselink, James. “Mankiewicz’s Cleopatra.” Films in Review, 39 (1988). 2–17.Google Scholar

Bexte, Peter. “Das Blinzeln Zenons.” In Gethmann and Schulz (eds.), Daumenkino. 268–272.Google Scholar

Biderman, Shai, and Weinman, Michael (eds.). Plato and the Moving Image. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. 2018.Google Scholar

Bieber, Margarete. The History of the Greek and Roman Theatre. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press / Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1961.Google Scholar

Bieber, Margarete. Laocoon: The Influence of the Group Since Its Rediscovery. Rev. and enlarged ed. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. 1967.Google Scholar

Bieber, Margarete. “Maske.” PW 14.2. 1930. 2070-2120.Google Scholar

Binnick, Robert E. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. New York: Oxford University Press. 1991.Google Scholar

Björkman, Stig, Manns, Torsten, and Sima, Jonas. Bergman on Bergman: Interviews with Ingmar Bergman. Tr. Paul Britten Austin. New York: Da Capo. 1993. Originally 1973.Google Scholar

Black, Max. Problems of Analysis: Philosophical Essays. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. 1971. Originally 1954.Google Scholar

Blatter, Jeremy. “Hugo Münsterberg: Psychologizing Spectatorship between Laboratory and Theater.” In Pomerance and Palmer (eds.), Thinking in the Dark. 7–18.Google Scholar

Blinkenberg, Chr. Archaeologische Studien. Kopenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel Nordisk Verlag / Leipzig: Harassowitz. 1904.Google Scholar

Bliss, Michael. Justified Lives: Morality and Narrative in the Films of Sam Peckinpah. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 1993.Google Scholar

Bliss, Michael. “Martyred Slaves of Time: Age, Regret, and Transcendence in The Wild Bunch.” In Bliss (ed.), Peckinpah Today. 36–44.Google Scholar

Bliss, Michael (ed.). Doing It Right: The Best Criticism on Sam Peckinpah’s The Wild Bunch. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 1994.Google Scholar

Bliss, Michael (ed.). Peckinpah Today: New Essays on the Films of Sam Peckinpah. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 2012.Google Scholar

Bliss, Michael (ed.). A Uniquely American Epic: Intimacy and Action, Tenderness and Violence in Sam Peckinpah’s The Wild Bunch. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. 2019.Google Scholar

Blood, Susan. “The Precinematic Novel: Zola’s La Bête humaine.” Representations, 93 no. 1 (2006). 49–75.Google Scholar

Blümner, Hugo (ed.). Lessings Laokoon. 2nd ed. Berlin: Weidmann. 1880.Google Scholar

Blum, Wilhelm. Höhlengleichnisse: Thema mit Variationen. Bielefeld: Aisthesis. 2004.Google Scholar

Boardman, John. Athenian Red Figure Vases: The Archaic Period. London: Thames & Hudson. 1975.Google Scholar

Bogdanovich, Peter. Who the Devil Made It: Conversations with Legendary Film Directors. New York: Ballantine. 1998. Originally 1997.Google Scholar

Bogdanovich, Peter. Who the Hell’s in It: Conversations with Hollywood’s Legendary Actors. New York: Ballantine. 2005. Originally 2004.Google Scholar

Bogue, Ronald. Deleuze on Cinema. New York: Routledge. 2003.Google Scholar

Boisvert, Raymond D. “Philosophical Themes in Bertolucci’s The Conformist.” Teaching Philosophy, 7 no. 1 (1984). 49–52.Google Scholar

Bol, Peter C. (ed.). Zum Verhältnis von Raum und Zeit in der griechischen Kunst. Möhnesee: Bibliopolis. 2003.Google Scholar

Bond, G. W. (ed. and comm.). Euripides: Hypsipyle. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1963.Google Scholar

Bondanella, Julia Conaway, and Bondanella, Peter (trs.). Giorgio Vasari: The Lives of the Artists. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1991. Rpt. 1998.Google Scholar

Bonitzer, Pascal. Décadrages: Peinture et cinéma. Paris: Éditions de l’ Étoile / Cahiers du Cinéma. 1985.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. “The Classical Hollywood Style, 1917–60.” Bordwell, In, Staiger, Janet, and Thompson, Kristin. The Classic Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. New York: Columbia University Press. 1985. 1–84 and 415–423.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. Filmguide to “La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc.” Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1973.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. The Films of Carl-Theodor Dreyer. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1981.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. “Grandmaster Flashback.” Bordwell, In and Thompson, Kristin. Minding Movies: Observations on the Art, Craft, and Business of Filmmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2011. 135–150.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. Pandora’s Digital Box: Films, Files, and the Future of the Movies. Madison, Wisc.: Irving Way Institute Press. 2012.Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. Reinventing Hollywood: How 1940s Filmmakers Changed Movie Storytelling. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2017. Rpt. 2019.Google Scholar

Boschung, Dietrich. Kairos as a Figuration of Time: A Case Study. Tr. Janine Fries-Knoblach. Munich: Fink. 2013.Google Scholar

Bottomore, Stephen. “The Panicking Audience? Early Cinema and the ‘Train Effect.’” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 19 no. 2 (1999). 177–216.Google Scholar

Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten, and Stamatellos, Giannis (eds.). Plotinus and the Moving Image. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. 2017.Google Scholar

Bowen, Elizabeth.”Introduction.” In Bowen, (ed.). The Faber Book of Modern Stories. London: Faber & Faber. 1937. 7–19. Rpt. 1941.Google Scholar

Bowser, Eileen. The Transformation of Cinema 1907–1915. New York: Scribner’s. 1990.Google Scholar

Boyd, Barbara Weiden. “Non enarrabile textum: Ecphrastic Trespass and Narrative Ambiguity in the Aeneid.” Vergilius, 41 (1995). 71–90.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (ed., tr., comm.). Seneca: Medea. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014.Google Scholar

Brain, Peter, and Skinner, D. D.. “Odysseus and the Axes: Homeric Ballistics Reconstructed.” Greece & Rome, 2nd ser., 25 no. 1 (April, 1978). 55–58.Google Scholar

Brannigan, Erin. Dancefilm: Choreography and the Moving Image. New York: Oxford University Press. 2011.Google Scholar

Braswell, Bruce Karl. A Commentary on the Fourth Pythian Ode of Pindar. Berlin: De Gruyter. 1988.Google Scholar

Braun, Marta. Picturing Time: The Work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830–1904). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1992.Google Scholar

Bresson, Robert. Bresson on Bresson: Interviews 1943–1983. Ed. Bresson, Mylène. Tr. Anna Moschovakis. New York: New York Review Books. 2016.Google Scholar

Bresson, Robert. Notes on the Cinematograph. Tr. Jonathan Griffin. New York: New York Review Books. 2016. Originally 1986.Google Scholar

Brewster, Ben, and Jacobs, Lea. Theatre to Cinema: Stage Pictorialism and the Early Feature Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1997.Google Scholar

Brewster, Sir David. Letters on Natural Magic: Addressed to Sir Walter Scott, Bart. 6th ed. London: Murray. 1851.Google Scholar

Brilliant, Richard. My Laocoön: Alternative Claims in the Interpretation of Artworks. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2000.Google Scholar

Brilliant, Richard. Visual Narratives: Storytelling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1984. Rpt. 1986.Google Scholar

Brink, C. O. Horace, on Poetry. Vol. 2: The ‘Ars Poetica’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1971. Rpt. 2011.Google Scholar

Brommer, Frank. Die Wahl des Augenblicks in der griechischen Kunst. Munich: Heimeran. 1969.Google Scholar

Brook, Donald. “White at the Shooting Gallery.” Mind, n.s. 74 no. 294 (April, 1965). 256.Google Scholar

Brown, Karl. Adventures with D. W. Griffith. Ed. Brownlow, Kevin. New York: Da Capo. 1976. Originally 1973.Google Scholar

Brownlow, Kevin. The Parade’s Gone By … Berkeley: University of California Press. 1975. Several rpts. Originally 1968.Google Scholar

Buckley, Craig, Campe, Rüdiger, and Casetti, Francesco (eds.). Screen Genealogies: From Optical Device to Environmental Medium. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2019.Google Scholar

Bühler, Winfried. “Das Element des Visuellen in der Eingangsszene von Heliodors Aithiopika.” Wiener Studien, 89 (1976). 177–185.Google Scholar

Buitron-Oliver, Diana. Douris: A Master-Painter of Athenian Red-Figure Vases. Mainz: von Zabern. 1995.Google Scholar

Bulgakowa, Oksana. Sergej Eisenstein - drei Utopien: Architekturentwürfe zur Filmtheorie. Berlin: PotemkinPress. 1996.Google Scholar

Burgess, Anthony. A Clockwork Orange. Ed. Rawlinson, Mark. New York: Norton. 2011. Rpt. 2019.Google Scholar

Burguet, Charles. “L’auteur de films.” In Le cinéma des origines à nos jours. 343–350.Google Scholar

Burkert, Walter. “Von Amenophis II. zur Bogenprobe des Odysseus.” Grazer Beiträge, 1 (1973). 69-78. Rpt. in Burkert. Kleine Schriften. Vol. 1: Homerica. Ed. Christoph Riedweg. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 2001. 72–79.Google Scholar

Burney, Charles. Music, Men and Manners in France and Italy 1770. Ed. Edmund Poole, H.. London: Eulenburg. 1974. Originally 1969.Google Scholar

Buruma, Ian. “Fools, Cowards, or Criminals?” The New York Review of Books (August 17, 2017). 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butcher, S. H. Aristotle’s Theory of Poetry and Fine Arts, with a Critical Text of The Poetics. 4th ed. New York: Dover, 1951. Several rpts. Originally 1907.Google Scholar

Butcher, S. H., and Lang, A. (trs.). The Odyssey of Homer Done into English Prose. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan. 1879.Google Scholar

Butler, Samuel. The Authoress of the Odyssey: Where and When She Wrote, Who She Was, the Use She Made of the Iliad, and How the Poem Grew Under Her Hands. London: Fyfield. 1897.Google Scholar

Butler, Terence. Crucified Heroes: The Films of Sam Peckinpah. London: Fraser. 1979.Google Scholar

Buxton, Richard (ed.). From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999. Rpt. 2001.Google Scholar

Buxton, Richard. “What Can You Rely on in Oedipus Rex? Response to Calame.” In Silk (ed.), Tragedy and the Tragic. 38–48.Google Scholar

Byrne, Sandie. “Harrison’s Deployment of Some Elements from Classical Greek Culture.” In Byrne (ed.), Tony Harrison and the Classics. 222–246.Google Scholar

Byrne, Sandie (ed.). Tony Harrison and the Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2022.Google Scholar

Cacoyannis, Michael. “Iphigenia: A Visual Essay.” In Winkler (ed.), Classical Myth and Culture in the Cinema. 102–117.Google Scholar

Calame, Claude. “Quand dire c’est faire voir: L’évidence dans la rhétorique antique.” Études de lettres, 49 no. 4 (1991). 3–22.Google Scholar

Calame, Claude. “Vision, Blindness, and Mask: The Radicalization of the Emotions in Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex.” In Silk (ed.), Tragedy and the Tragic. 17–37.Google Scholar

Calvino, Italo. Six Memos for the Next Millennium. Tr. Patrick Creagh. New York: Vintage. 1993. Originally 1988.Google Scholar

Calvino, Italo. Why Read the Classics? Tr. Martin McLaughlin. Boston: Mariner Books. 2014. Originally 1999.Google Scholar

Camuffo, Dario. “La Camera Oscura: Il nostro occhio nel passato.” In Il vedutismo veneziano: Una nuova visione. Milan: Fondazione Bracco. 2012. 53–143.Google Scholar

Cano, Pedro L. De Aristóteles a Woody Allen: Poética y retórica para cine y televisión. Barcelona: Gedisa. 1999.Google Scholar

Canudo[, Ricciotto]. “Manifeste des SEPT ARTS.” Gazette des Sept Arts, 2 (1923). 2.Google Scholar

Capra, Andrea. “Plato’s Cinematic Vision: War as Spectacle in Four Dialogues (Laches, Republic, Timaeus and Critias).” In Bakogiannis, Anastasia and Hope, Valerie M. (eds.). War as Spectacle: Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Display of Armed Conflict. London: Bloomsbury. 2015. 119–138 and 374–375.Google Scholar

Caps, John. “Soundtracks 101: Essential Movie Music: A Listener’s Guide.” Film Comment, 39 no. 6 (2003). 31–49.Google Scholar

Caracciolo, Marco. “Bones in Outer Space: Narrative and the Cosmos in 2001: A Space Odyssey.” Image [&] Narrative, 16 no. 3 (2015). 73–89.Google Scholar

Carbone, Mauro. Philosophy-Screens: From Cinema to the Digital Revolution. Tr. Marta Nijhuis. Albany: State University of New York Press. 2019.Google Scholar

Carbone, Mauro. “Thematizing the Arche-Screen Through Its Variations.” Tr. Marta Nijhuis. In Chateau and Moure (eds.), Screens. 62–69 and 281–284.Google Scholar

Cariou, Marie. “Bergson: The Keyboards of Forgetting.” In Mullarkey (ed.), The New Bergson. 99–117.Google Scholar

Carter, John. “The Beginning of Narrative Art in the Greek Geometric Period.” The Annual of the British School at Athens, 67 (1972). 25–58.Google Scholar

Cartier-Bresson, Henri. The Decisive Moment. New York: Simon & Schuster. 1952. Facsimile rpt. Göttingen: Steidl. 2014.Google Scholar

Casetti, Francesco. “Primal Screens.” In Buckley, Campe, and Casetti (eds.), Screen Genealogies. 27–50.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor. “Aristotle and the Cartesian Theatre.” In Gregoric and Fink (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. 169–220.Google Scholar

Cauliez, A.-J. “Le cinéma moyen intégral d’expression.” L’Age nouveau, 11 no. 93 (1955). 5–12.Google Scholar

Cavarero, Adriana. “Regarding the Cave.” Tr. Paul Kottman. Qui Parle, 10 no. 1 (1996). 1–20.Google Scholar

Cawelti, John G. Adventure, Mystery, and Romance: Formula Stories as Art and Popular Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1976. Rpt. 2014.Google Scholar

Cazzato, Vanessa, and Lardinois, André (eds.). The Look of Lyric: Greek Song and the Visual. Leiden: Brill. 2016.Google Scholar

Ceram, C. W. Archaeology of the Cinema. Tr. Richard Winston. London: Thames & Hudson / New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. 1965.Google Scholar

Chapin, Anne P. “Aegean Painting in the Bronze Age.” In Pollitt, J. J. (ed.). The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014. 1–65.Google Scholar

Chappell, V. C. “Time and Zeno’s Arrow.” The Journal of Philosophy, 59 no. 8 (1962). 197–213.Google Scholar

Chateau, Dominic, and Moure, José (eds.). Screens: From Materiality to Spectatorship – A Historical and Theoretical Assessment. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2016.Google Scholar

Chauvet, Jean-Marie, Deschamps, Eliette Brunel, and Hillaire, Christian. Chauvet Cave: The Discovery of the World’s Oldest Paintings. London: Thames & Hudson. 1996. = Dawn of Art: The Chauvet Cave: The Oldest Known Paintings in the World. New York: Abrams. 1996.Google Scholar

Chauvois, L. “Le ‘cinéma populaire’ en Grèce au temps de Platon et sa projection dans l’allégorie de la ‘caverne aux idées.’” Revue generale des sciences pures et appliquées, 74 nos. 7–8 (1967). 193–196.Google Scholar

Chierichetti, David. Mitchell Leisen, Hollywood Director. Los Angeles: Photoventures Press. 1995.Google Scholar

Chinn, Christopher M. “Before Your Very Eyes: Pliny Epistulae 5.6 and the Ancient Theory of Ekphrasis.” Classical Philology, 102 (2007). 265–280.Google Scholar

Cieply, Michael. “Eat Your Heart Out, MGM Kitty: Movie Studios Strive for Ever More Inventive Logos.” The New York Times (July 10, 2014). AR 10. www.nytimes.com/2014/07/13/movies/movie-studios-strive-for-ever-more-inventive-logos.html?_r=0.Google Scholar

Ciment, Michel. Kubrick: The Definitive Edition. Tr. Gilbert Adair and Robert Bononno. New York: Faber & Faber / Farrar Straus Giroux. 2001.Google Scholar

Le cinéma des origines à nos jours. Paris: Éditions du Cygne. 1932.Google Scholar

“Cinerama.” Harrison’s Reports, 34 no. 40 (October 4, 1952). 157 and 160.Google Scholar

Clauss, James J. The Best of the Argonauts: The Redefinition of the Epic Hero in Book 1 of Apollonius’s Argonautica. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1993. Rpt. 2021.Google Scholar

Clay, Jenny Strauss. Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the Iliad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2011.Google Scholar

“Close-Ups: Editorial Expression Comment and Timely Comment.” Photoplay Magazine, 20 no. 4 (1921). 34.Google Scholar

Coates, Paul. Screening the Face. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2012.Google Scholar

Cockle, W. E. H. (ed.). Euripides Hypsipyle: Text and Annotation Based on a Re-Examination of the Papyri. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo. 1987.Google Scholar

Cocteau, Jean. The Art of Cinema. Ed. Bernard, André and Gauteur, Claude. Tr. Robin Buss. London and New York: Boyars. 1992. Rpt. 1994.Google Scholar

Cocteau, Jean. Du cinématographe. 3rd ed. Ed. Bernard, André and Gauteur, Claude. Monaco: Éditions du Rocher. 2003.Google Scholar

Cohen, Ada. The Alexander Mosaic: Stories of Victory and Defeat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997.Google Scholar

Coissac, G.-Michel. Les coulisses du cinéma. Paris: Les Éditions Pittoresques. 1929.Google Scholar

Coissac, G.-Michel. De l’évolution de la projection à travers les Ages. Paris: Lahure. 1910.Google Scholar

Coissac, G.-Michel. Histoire du cinématographe: De ses origines jusqu’à nos jours. Paris: Éditions de ‘Cinéopse’ / Gauthiers-Villars. 1925.Google Scholar

Collard, Christopher, and Cropp, Martin (eds. and trs.). Euripides VIII: Fragments: Oedipus-Chrysippus, Other Fragments. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 2008.Google Scholar

Collins, Christopher. The Poetics of the Mind’s Eye: Literature and the Psychology of Imagination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 1991.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. “Fatal Charades: Roman Executions Staged as Mythological Enactments.” Journal of Roman Studies, 80 (1990). 44–73 and plates I–II.Google Scholar

Colman, Felicity. Deleuze and Cinema: The Film Concepts. Oxford: Berg. 2011.Google Scholar

Colman, Felicity (ed.). Film, Theory and Philosophy: The Key Thinkers. London: Routledge. 2014. Originally 2009.Google Scholar

Comito, Terry (ed.). Touch of Evil: Orson Welles, Director. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 1985. Fourth, rev., printing, 1995.Google Scholar

“Congrès de 1955: Groupe VI.” Cinémas, 19 nos. 2–3 (2009). 327–331.Google Scholar

Constantinidou, Soteroula. The Gaze of Homer: Light and Vision in the Iliad. Athens: Institut du Livre / Kardamitsa. 2019.Google Scholar

Conte, Gian Bagio. Latin Literature: A History. Tr. Joseph B. Solodow. Rev. Don Fowler and Glenn W. Most. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1994.Google Scholar

Cook, Albert. Homer: The Odyssey: A New Verse Translation. New York: Norton. 1967.Google Scholar

Cook, Olive. Movement in Two Dimensions: A Study of the Animated and Projected Pictures Which Preceded the Invention of Cinematography. London: Hutchinson. 1963.Google Scholar

Corcilius, Klaus. “The Gate to Reality: Aristotle’s Basic Account of Perception.” In Cohoe, Caleb M. (ed.). Aristotle’s On the Soul: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2022. 122–154.Google Scholar

Cormier, Raymond. “The Closed Society and Its Friends: Plato’s Republic and Lucas’s THX-1138.” Literature/Film Quarterly, 18 (1990). 193–197.Google Scholar

Cornford, Francis MacDonald (tr.). The Republic of Plato. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1941.Google Scholar

Costa, C. D. N. Lucretius: De Rerum Natura 5. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1984.Google Scholar

Crandall, Ernest L. “Possibilities of the Cinema in Education.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 128 (November 1926). 109–115.Google Scholar

Crisp, C. G. François Truffaut. London: Praeger. 1972.Google Scholar

Croce, Arlene. The Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers Book. 2nd ed. Columbus, Ohio: The Educational Publisher. 2010.Google Scholar

Croisille, J.-M. “Le sacrifice d’Iphigénie dans l’art romain et la littérature latine.” Latomus, 22 (1963). 209–225.Google Scholar

Cropp, Martin. “Hypsipyle and Athens.” In Csapo, Eric and Miller, Margaret C. (eds.). Poetry, Theory, Praxis: The Social Life of Myth, Word and Image in Ancient Greece: Essays in Honour of William J. Slater. Oxford: Oxbow Books. 2003. 129–145.Google Scholar

Csapo, Eric, and Slater, William J. The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 1995. Rpt. 2005.Google Scholar

Cuff, Paul. Abel Gance and the End of Silent Cinema: Sounding Out Utopia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan / Springer. 2016.Google Scholar

Cullhed, Eric. “Movement and Sound on the Shield of Achilles in Ancient Exegesis.” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 54 (2014). 192–219.Google Scholar

Damas, Georges. “Le cinéma et la pensée.” L’Age nouveau, 11 no. 93 (1955). 18–23.Google Scholar

Danner, Mark. “The Slow-Motion Coup.” The New York Review of Books (October 6, 2022). 39–41.Google Scholar

Darke, Chris. La Jetée. London: Palgrave / British Film Institute. 2016.Google Scholar

Davis, Blair, Anderson, Robert, and Walls, Jan (eds.). Rashomon Effects: Kurosawa, Rashomon, and Their Legacies. London: Routledge. 2015.Google Scholar

de Baecque, Antoine. La cinéphilie: Invention d’un regard, historie d’une culture, 1944–1968. Paris: Fayard. 2003. Rpt. 2013.Google Scholar

de Jong, Irene J. F. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2001.Google Scholar

de Jong, Irene J. F. “Pluperfects and the Artist in Ekphrases: From the Shield of Achilles to the Shield of Aeneas (and Beyond).” Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 68 (2015). 889–916.Google Scholar

de Jong, Irene J. F. “The Shield of Achilles: From Metalepsis to Mise en Abyme.” Ramus, 40 no. 1 (2011). 1–14.Google Scholar

de Lauretis, Teresa, and Heath, Stephen (eds.). The Cinematic Apparatus. New York: St. Martin’s. 1980.Google Scholar

Deamer, David. Deleuze’s Cinema Books: Three Introductions to the Taxonomy of Images. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2016.Google Scholar

Debord, Guy. The Society of the Spectacle. Tr. Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books. 1994. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Debschitz, Uta, and Thilo von, . Fritz Kahn: Infographics Pioneer. Cologne: Taschen. 2013. Rpt. 2017.Google Scholar

Decker, Wolfgang. Sports and Games of Ancient Egypt. Tr. Allen Guttmann. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1992.Google Scholar

Delebecque, Édouart. “Le jeu de l’arc de l’‘Odyssée.’” In Bingen, Jean, Cambier, Guy, and Nachtergael, Georges (eds.). Le monde grec: Pensée, littérature, histoire: Hommages à Claire Préaux. Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles. 1975. 56–67.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. Bergsonism. Tr. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. New York: Zone Books. 1991.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Tr. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. London: Athlone Press. 1989.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Tr. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta. London: Athlone Press. 1989.Google Scholar

Della Casa, Stefano. Riccardo Freda. Rome: Bulzoni. 1999.Google Scholar

Della Porta, Giovanni. Natural Magick by John Baptista Porta, a Neapolitane: in Twenty Books; Wherein are set forth All the Riches and Delights of the Natural Sciences. London. 1568.Google Scholar

DeRoo, Rebecca J. Agnès Varda between Film, , Photography, and Art. Oakland: University of California Press. 2018.Google Scholar

Deslandes, Jacques. Histoire comparée du cinéma. Vol. 1: De la cinématique au cinématographe 1826–1896. Paris: Casterman. 1966.Google Scholar

Desroches Noblecourt, Christiane. “Le film et l’écran au temps des Pharaons.” L’amour de l’art, 29 nos. 37–39 (1949). 7–10.Google Scholar

Destrée, Pierre, and Radcliffe, G. , Edmonds III. “Introduction: The Power – and the Problems – of Plato’s Images.” In Destrée, and Edmonds, (eds.). Plato and the Power of Images. Leiden: Brill. 2017. 1–10.Google Scholar

Dewender, Thomas, and Welt, Thomas (eds.). Imagination – Fiktion – Kreation: Das kulturschaffende Vermögen der Phantasie. Munich: Saur. 2003.Google Scholar

Diès, Auguste. “Encore Guignol.” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 15 (1927). 38–46.Google Scholar

Diès, Auguste. “Guignol à Athènes.” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé, 14 (1927). 6–19.Google Scholar

“Die teuerste kinematographische Aufnahme: Der Untergang eines Ozeandampfers auf hoher See.” Neuigkeits-Welt-Blatt (Vienna), 209 (September 11, 1913). 21–22.Google Scholar

Doane, Mary Ann. Bigger Than Life: The Close-Up and Scale in the Cinema. Durham, nc: Duke University Press. 2021.Google Scholar

Doane, Mary Anne. “Remembering Women: Psychical and Historical Constructions in Film Theory.” In Kaplan (ed.), Psychoanalysis and Cinema. 46–63 and 223–225.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. The Greeks and the Irrational. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1951. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (ed. and comm.). Euripides: Bacchae. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Doran, Greg. “Staging the Odyssey.” Omnibus, 26 (1993). 1–3.Google Scholar

dos Santos, Arysio N. “A Quantum Mechanical Solution of Zeno’s Paradoxes.” Manuscrito, 2 no. 1 (October 1978). 19–29.Google Scholar

Douglass, Paul. “Bergson and Cinema: Friends or Foes?” In Mullarkey (ed.), The New Bergson. 209–227.Google Scholar

Douglass, Paul. “Deleuze, Cinema, Bergson.” Social Semiotics, 8 no. 1 (1998). 25-35.Google Scholar

Dowden, Ken. “Heliodoros: Serious Intentions.” The Classical Quarterly, 46 (1996). 267–285.Google Scholar

Dowden, Ken. “Kalasiris, Apollonios of Tyana, and the Lies of Teiresias.” In Panayotakis, Stelios, Schmeling, Gareth, and Paschalis, Michael (eds.). Holy Men and Charlatans in the Ancient Novel. Groningen: Barkhuis. 2015. 1–16.Google Scholar

Dräger, Paul. “‘Abbruchsformel’ und Jona-Motiv in Pindars Vierter Pythischer Ode.” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft, 21 (1996–1997). 93–99.Google Scholar

Dreyer, Carl-Theodor. “Realized Mysticism.” In Skoller (ed.), Dreyer in Double Reflection. 47 and 50.Google Scholar

Dreyer, Carl-Theodor. “Thoughts on my Craft.” In MacCann, Richard Dyer (ed.). Film: A Montage of Theories. New York: Dutton, 1966. 312–317. Originally 1955.Google Scholar

Drum, Jean and Dale, D. My Only Great Passion: The Life and Films of Carl Th. Dreyer. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. 2000.Google Scholar

Dubois, Philippe. “The Flux-Image.” In Somaini, Antonio (ed.). Time Machine: Cinematic Temporalities. Milan: Skira. 2020. 133–151.Google Scholar

Duckworth, George E. The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. 2nd ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. 1994.Google Scholar

Düring, Ingemar. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. 1957.Google Scholar

Dukore, Bernard F. Sam Peckinpah’s Feature Films. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 1999.Google Scholar

Dunlap, Orrin E. The Outlook for Television. New York: Harper. 1932.Google Scholar

Duras, Marguerite, and Godard, Jean-Luc. “Entretiens télévisé.” In Godard, Jean-Luc Godard par Jean-Luc Godard. Ed. Bergala, Alain. 2nd ed. Vol. 2: 1985–1998. Paris: Cahiers du Cinéma. 1998. 140–147.Google Scholar

Durgnat, Raymond. Films and Feelings. London: Faber & Faber, 1967.Google Scholar

Durie, Robin. “The Strange Nature of the Instant.” In Durie, (ed.). Time and the Instant: Essays in the Physics and Philosophy of Time. Manchester: Clinamen Press. 2000. 1–24.Google Scholar

During, Elie. “Notes on the Bergsonian Cinematograph.” Tr. Franck Le Gac. In Albera, François and Tortajada, Maria (eds.). Cine-Dispositives: Essays in Epistemology across Media. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2015. 115–128.Google Scholar

During, Elie. “Trois figures de la simulation.” In During, Matrix: Machine philosophique. 173–195.Google Scholar

During, Elie (intro.). Matrix: Machine philosophique. 2nd ed. Paris: Ellipses. 2013.Google Scholar

Dyer, Geoff. The Ongoing Moment. New York: Viking, 2007. Originally 2005.Google Scholar

Eades, Caroline. Cinéma et mythologie: Varda, Resnais, Honoré, Annaud. Paris: L’Harmattan. 2021.Google Scholar

Eades, Caroline, and Létoublon, Françoise. “From Film Analysis to Oral-Formulaic Theory: The Case of the Yellow Oilskins.” In Falkner, Thomas M., Felson, Nancy, and Konstan, David (eds.). Contextualizing Classics: Ideology, Performance, Dialogue. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. 1999. 301–316.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Oxford: Blackwell. 2002. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Easterling, Pat, and Hall, Edith (eds.). Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002.Google Scholar

Eckert, Maureen. “Cinematic Spelunking Inside Plato’s Cave.” Glimpse, 9 (2012). 42–49.Google Scholar

Eder, Josef Maria. Ausführliches Handbuch der Photographie. Part 1.1: Geschichte der Photochemie und Photographie vom Alterthume bis in die Gegenwart. 2nd ed. Halle: Knapp. 1892.Google Scholar

Eder, Josef Maria. History of Photography. 4th ed. Tr. Edward Epstean. New York: Dover. 1978. Originally 1945.Google Scholar

Edwards, Mark W. Sound, Sense, and Rhythm: Listening to Greek and Latin Poetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2002. Rpt. 2004.Google Scholar

“L’effet Kuleshov.” Iris, 4 no. 1 (1986). Special issue.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Benjamin. The Brain in Search of Itself: Santiago Ramón y Cajal and the Story of the Neuron. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux. 2023.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Benjamin. The Dreams of Santiago Ramón y Cajal. New York: Oxford. 2017.Google Scholar

Eisenschitz, Bernard. “Ulysse: Homère, pas Joyce.” In Farassino (ed.), Mario Camerini. 77–82.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. “Dickens, Griffith and Ourselves.” In Eisenstein, Selected Works. Vol. 3. 193–238.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. Film Essays and a Lecture. Ed. and tr. Leyda, Jay. New York: Praeger. 1970. Expanded ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. “In Close-Up.” In Eisenstein, Selected Works. Vol. 3. 270–273.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. “Laocoön.” In Eisenstein, Selected Works. Vol. 2. 109–202.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. “Lessons from Literature.” In Eisenstein, Film Essays and a Lecture. 77–84.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. “Montage 1937.” In Eisenstein, Selected Works. Vol. 2. 11–58.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. “Montage and Architecture.” In Eisenstein, Selected Works. Vol. 2. 59–81.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. Nonindifferent Nature. Tr. Herbert Marshall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1987. Rpt. 1994.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. Notes for a General History of Cinema. Ed. Kleiman, Naum and Somaini, Antonio. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2016.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. On the Detective Story. Ed. and tr. Upchurch, Alan. New ed. London: Seagull Books. 2017.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. The Primal Phenomenon: Art. Ed. Bulgakowa, Oksana and Hochmuth, Dietmar. Tr. Dustin Condren. Berlin: PotemkinPress. 2017.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. “The Prometheus of Mexican Painting.” In Eisenstein, Film Essays and a Lecture. Expanded ed. 222-231.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. Selected Works. Vol. 2: Towards a Theory of Montage. Ed. Glenny, Michael and Taylor, Richard. Tr. Michael Glenny. London and New York: Tauris. 2010. Originally 1991.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergei. Selected Works. Vol. 3: Writings: 1934–47. Ed. Taylor, Richard. Tr. William Powell. London and New York: Tauris. 2010. Originally 1988.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergey M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya v shesti tomakh. Ed. Yutkevitch, Sergey I. et al. Moscow: Isskustvo. 1964–1971.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergey M. Metod. 2 vols. Ed. Klejman, N. I.. Moscow: Muzej kino: Eijzenshtein-tsentr. 2002.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Sergey M. Metod. 4 vols. Ed. Bulgakowa, Oksana. Berlin: PotemkinPress. 2008.Google Scholar

Ejzenshtejn, Sergei Mikhaylovitch. Neravnodushnaya priroda. Vol. 1: Chuvstvo kino. Ed. Kleyman, Naum. Moscow: Ejzenshtejn-tsentr, 2004.Google Scholar

Eisner, Will. Comics and Sequential Art: Principles and Practices from the Legendary Cartoonist. New York: Norton. 2008.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S. What Is a Classic? An Address Delivered before the Virgil Society on the 16th of October 1944. London: Faber & Faber. 1945. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Elley, Derek. The Epic Film: Myth and History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1984.Google Scholar

Ellis, Carlyle. “Art and the Motion Picture.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 128 (November, 1926). 54–57.Google Scholar

Elsaesser, Thomas. “Harun Farocki: Filmmaker, Artist, Media Theorist.” In Elsaesser, (ed.). Harun Farocki: Working on the Sightlines. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2004. 11–40.Google Scholar

Elsom, Helen. “Apuleius and the Movies.” In Hofmann, Heinz (ed.). Groningen Colloquia on the Novel. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1989. 141–150.Google Scholar

Emmanuel, Maurice. The Antique Greek Dance After Sculptured and Painted Figures. Tr. Harriet Jean Beauley. London: Lane, The Bodley Head / New York: Lane. 1916.Google Scholar

Epstein, Jean. Écrits sur le cinéma. 2 vols. Paris: Seghers. 1974.Google Scholar

Epstein, Jean. “L’intelligence d’une machine.” In Epstein, Écrits sur le cinéma. Vol. 1. 255–334.Google Scholar

Epstein, Jean. “La logique des images.” In Epstein, Écrits sur le cinéma. Vol. 2. 30–33.Google Scholar

Evans, Max. Sam Peckinpah, Master of Violence: Being the Account of the Making of a Movie and Other Sundry Things. Vermillion: Dakota Press / University of South Dakota. 1972.Google Scholar

Evans, Robin. “Translations from Drawing to Building.” AA [Architectural Association] Files, 12 (Summer, 1986). 3–18.Google Scholar

Eyman, Scott. Ernst Lubitsch: Laughter in Paradise. New York: Simon & Schuster. 1993. Rpt. 2015.Google Scholar

Fagles, Robert (tr.). Homer: The Odyssey. New York: Penguin. 2006. Originally 1996.Google Scholar

Fairbanks, Arthur (ed. and tr.). Philostratus the Elder: Imagines / Philostratus the Younger: Imagines / Callistratus: Descriptions. London: Heinemann / Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1931. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Fairfax, Daniel. The Red Years of Cahiers du cinéma (1968–1973). Vol. 2: Aesthetics and Ontology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2021.Google Scholar

Fanciulli, Giuseppe. “The Aeneid: Scenario for a Film Based on Virgil’s Poem.” International Review of Educational Cinematography, 3 no. 2 (1931). 113–135.Google Scholar

Fanciulli, Giuseppe. “Virgil.” The International Review of Educational Cinematography, 2 no. 10 (1930). 1139–1162.Google Scholar

Farassino, Alberto (ed.). Mario Camerini. Locarno: Éditions du Festival International du Film de Locarno / Editions Yellow Now. 1992.Google Scholar

Farber, Stephen. “Peckinpah’s Return.” Film Quarterly, 23 no. 1 (Fall, 1969). 2–11. Rpt. in Bliss (ed.), Doing It Right. 31–45.Google Scholar

Faris, J. A. The Paradoxes of Zeno. Aldershot: Avebury. 1996.Google Scholar

Feldherr, Andrew. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1998.Google Scholar

Fell, John L. Film and the Narrative Tradition. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1986.Google Scholar

Ferguson, A. S. “Plato’s Simile of Light. Part II: The Allegory of the Cave (Continued).” The Classical Quarterly, 16 no. 1 (1922). 15–28.Google Scholar

Fernández-Galiano, Manuel. “Books XXI–XXII.” In Russo, Fernández-Galiano, and Heubeck, A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Vol. 3. 129–310.Google Scholar

Ferrer, Carolina. “L’évolution de la fin: De La Jetée à 12 Monkeys.” Cinémas, 13 no. 3 (2003). 53–77.Google Scholar

Field, Syd. Screenplay: The Foundations of Screenwriting. Rev. ed. New York: Delta. 2005.Google Scholar

Field, Syd. The Screenwriter’s Workbook. 5th ed. New York: Delta. 2006.Google Scholar

Fine, Marshall. Bloody Sam: The Life and Films of Sam Peckinpah. New York: Miramax. 2005. Originally 1991.Google Scholar

Finn, James J. “Men of Destiny.” The Motion Picture Projectionist, 1 no. 4 (February, 1928). 17–22.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Robert (tr.). Homer: The Odyssey. Garden City: Doubleday / Anchor Books. 1963.Google Scholar

Flanagan, Frances. “Time, History, and Fascism in Bertolucci’s Films.” The European Legacy, 4 (1999). 89–98.Google Scholar

Flaxman, Gregory (ed.). The Brain Is the Screen: Deleuze and the Philosophy of Cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 2000.Google Scholar

Flint, Valerie, et al. Witchcraft and Magic in Europe: Ancient Greece and Rome. London: Athlone Press. 1999.Google Scholar

Förster, Richard. “Goethes Abhandlung über die philostratischen Gemälde.” Goethe-Jahrbuch, 24 (1903). 167–184.Google Scholar

Förster, Richard (ed.). Moritz von Schwinds philostratische Gemälde. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel. 1903.Google Scholar

Folkierski, Władysław. Entre le classicisme et le romantisme: Étude sur l’esthêtique et les esthêticiens du XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Champion. 1969. Originally 1925.Google Scholar

Fohn, Marjorie Powell. “When a Fan Club Meets: Then the Fun Begins.” Picture-Play Magazine, 15 no. 4 (December, 1921). 66–67 and 88.Google Scholar

Fondermann, Philip. Kino im Kopf: Zur Visualisierung des Mythos in den “Metamorphosen” Ovids. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 2008.Google Scholar

Ford, Andrew. “The Purpose of Aristotle’s Poetics.” Classical Philology, 110 (2015). 1–21.Google Scholar

Forsyth, James. Tyrone Guthrie: A Biography. London: Hamish Hamilton. 1976.Google Scholar

Fowler, Alastair. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1982.Google Scholar

Fowler, Don. “Narrate and Describe: The Problem of Ekphrasis.” In Fowler. Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000. 64–85. Originally in The Journal of Roman Studies, 81 (1991). 25–35.Google Scholar

Fowler, Robert L. Early Greek Mythography. Vol. 1: Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2000.Google Scholar

Fowler, Robert L. Early Greek Mythography. Vol. 2: Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013.Google Scholar

Fraigneau, André. Cocteau on the Film. Tr. Vera Traill. New ed. New York: Dover. 1972.Google Scholar

Francastel, P. “Études comparées: Compte rendu.” Revue internationale de filmologie, 8 nos. 20–24 (1955). 62–65.Google Scholar

Francastel, Pierre. L’image, la vision et l’imagination: L’objet filmique et l’objet plastique. Ed. Francastel, Galienne. Paris: Denoël / Gonthier. 1983.Google Scholar

Francis, Gavin. “Scrolling.” The New York Review of Books (September 23, 2021). 60–62.Google Scholar

Fränkel, Hermann. Die homerischen Gleichnisse. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 1921. Rpt. 1977.Google Scholar

Fränkel, Hermann. Noten zu den Argonautika des Apollonios. Munich: Beck. 1968.Google Scholar

Frayling, Christopher. Once Upon a Time in the West: Shooting a Masterpiece. London: Reel Art Press. 2019.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 4: The Interpretation of Dreams. Part 1; corr. rpt. London: Hogarth Press. 1958. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Freytag gennant Löringhoff, Bettina von. “Argonautika: Ein etruskischer Spiegel in der Tübinger Sammlung.” In von Freytag, Dietrich Mannsperger, and Friedhelm Prayon. Praestant Interna: Festschrift für Ulrich Hausmann. Tübingen: Wasmuth. 1982. 271–278.Google Scholar

Friedländer, Paul. “Kritische Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Heldensage.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, n.s. 69 (1914). 299–341.Google Scholar

Friend, Tad. “Heavy Weather.” The New Yorker (March 17, 2014). 46–57.Google Scholar

Frizot, Michel. “Comment ça marche: L’algorithme cinématographique.” Cinémathèque, 15 (Spring 1999). 15–27.Google Scholar

Froning, Heide. “Anfänge der kontinuierlichen Bilderzählung in der griechischen Kunst.” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, 103 (1988). 169–199.Google Scholar

Futre Pinheiro, Marílla P. “Time and Narrative Technique in Heliodorus’ ‘Aethiopica’.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, 2.34.4 (1998), 3148–3173.Google Scholar

Gaisser, Julia Haig. “Threads in the Labyrinth: Competing Views and Voices in Catullus 64.” The American Journal of Philology, 116 (1995). 597–616. Rpt. in Gaisser (ed.). Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Catullus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 217–258.Google Scholar

Gale, Monica (ed.). Lucretius: De Rerum Natura Book 5. London: Aris & Phillips. 2015. Originally 2009.Google Scholar

Gall, Dorothee, and Wolkenhauer, Anja (eds.). Laokoon in Literatur und Kunst: Schriften des Symposiums “Laokoon in Literatur und Kunst” vom 30. 11. 2006, Universität Bonn. Berlin: De Gruyter. 2009.Google Scholar

Gallavotti, Carlo. “Note omeriche e micenee.” Studi micenei ed egeo-anatolici, 15 (1972). 7–32.Google Scholar

Gantz, Timothy. Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1993. Rpt. in two vols. (cont. pag.). 1996.Google Scholar

Garcia, Jorge Tomas. “The Cinematic Image as Platonic Simulacrum.” In Biderman and Weinman (eds.), Plato and the Moving Image. 79–99.Google Scholar

Garis, Robert. The Films of Orson Welles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004.Google Scholar

Garnett, David (ed.). The Letters of T. E. Lawrence. London: Cape. 1938.Google Scholar

Garofalo, Marcello. Il cinema è mito: Vita e film di Sergio Leone. Rome: Minimum fax. 2020.Google Scholar

Garofalo, Marcello. Tutto il cinema di Sergio Leone. Milan: Baldini & Castoldi. 2001. Originally 1999.Google Scholar

Gärtner, Hans (ed.). Beiträge zum griechischen Liebesroman. Hildesheim: Olms. 1984.Google Scholar

Gatton, Matt. “The Eleusinian Projector: The Hierophant’s Optical Method of Conjuring the Goddess.” In Papadopoulos, Costas and Moyes, Holley (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2017. 583–603.Google Scholar

Gaudreault, André. From Plato to Lumière: Narration and Monstration in Literature and Cinema. Tr. Timothy Barnard. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2009.Google Scholar

Gaudreault, André, and Gauthier, Philippe. “De la filmologie à la sémiologie: Figures de l’alternance au cinéma.” Cinémas, 25 nos. 2–3 (2015). 159–173.Google Scholar

Gazis, George Alexander. “Homer and the Art of Cinematic Warfare.” In Capra, Andrea and Floridi, Lucia (eds.). Intervisuality: New Approaches to Greek Literature. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2023. 81–101.Google Scholar

Gehman, Henry S. “Moving Pictures among the Romans.” The Classical Weekly, 15 no. 13 (1922). 97–100.Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Tr. Channa Newman. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 1997.Google Scholar

Gennarelli, Achille. La moneta primitiva e i monumenti dell’Italia antica messi in rapporto cronologico e ravicinnati alle opere d’arte delle altre nazioni civili dell’ antichità per dedurre onde fosse l’origine ed il progresso delle arti e dell’incivilimento. Rome: Reverenda Camera Apostolica. 1843.Google Scholar

Georges-Michel, Michel. “En jardinant avec Bergson.” In Georges-Michel. En jardinant avec Bergson … Paris: Albin Michel. 1926. 9–16.Google Scholar

Gerhard, Eduard. Etruskische Spiegel. Vol. 3. Pt. 1. Berlin: Reimer. 1862.Google Scholar

Gerhard, Eduard. “Iason des Drachen Beute: Ein Vasenbild.” In Ein Programm des Archäologischen Instituts in Rom zur Feier des einundzwanzigsten Aprils. Berlin: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften. 1835.Google Scholar

Gerhard, Od. [sic for Ed.]. “Tazza dal Giasone.” Annali dell’Instituto di Correspondenza Archeologica / Annales de l’Institut de Correspondance Archéologique. Rome. 1836. 289–295.Google Scholar

Gerhardius, Eduardus. Lectiones Apollonianae. Leipzig: Fleischer. 1816.Google Scholar

Germani, Sergio G. Mario Camerini. Florence: Il Castoro Cinema / “La Nuova Italia” Editrice. 1980.Google Scholar

Gernsheim, Helmut and Allison, . The History of Photography from the camera obscura to the Beginning of the Modern Era. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1969.Google Scholar

Gethmann, Daniel. “Simulacra der Bewegung.” In Gethmann and Schulz (eds.), Daumenkino. 294–307.Google Scholar

Gethmann, Daniel, and Schulz, Christoph (eds.). Daumenkino: The Flip Book Show. Düsseldorf: Snoeck / Kunsthalle Düsseldorf. 2005.Google Scholar

Giangrande, Giuseppe. “Hypsipyle’s Children: Eur. Hyps. Fr. 64,93 Bond.” Museum Philologicum Londiniense, 2 (1977). 165–175 and 319–320 (plates).Google Scholar

Gianvittorio-Ungar, Laura, and Schlapbach, Karin (eds.). Choreonarratives: Dancing Stories in Greek and Roman Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden: Brill. 2021.Google Scholar

Giuliani, Luca. Image and Myth: A History of Pictorial Narration in Greek Art. Tr. Joseph O’Donnell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2013.Google Scholar

Giuliani, Luca. “Images and Storytelling.” In Barringer and Lissarague (eds.), Images at the Crossroads. 71–88.Google Scholar

Giuliano, Fabio Massimo. Platone e la poesia: Teoria della composizione e prassi della ricezione. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag. 2005.Google Scholar

Gocer, Asli. “The Puppet Theater in Plato’s Parable of the Cave.” The Classical Journal, 95 no. 2 (1999). 119–129.Google Scholar

Godard, Jean-Luc. Godard on Godard. Tr. and ed. Milne, Tom. New ed. New York: Da Capo. 1986.Google Scholar

Godard, Jean-Luc. “Summer with Monika.” In Narboni, Jean and Milne, Tom (eds.). Godard on Godard. Tr. Milne. New York: Da Capo. 1986. 84–85. Originally 1972.Google Scholar

Goebel, Anton. “Zu Homeros.” Jahrbücher für classische Philologie, 22 = Jahnsche Jahrbücher für Philologie und Paedagogik, 113 (1876). 169–174.Google Scholar

Gödde, Günter. “Therapeutik und Ästhetik: Verbindungen zwischen Breuers und Freuds kathartischer Therapie und der Katharsis-Konzeption von Jacob Bernays.” In Vöhler and Linck (eds.), Grenzen der Katharsis in den modernen Künsten. 63–91.Google Scholar

Goette, Hans Rupprecht. Athens, Attica, and the Megarid: An Archaeological Guide. London: Routledge. 2001.Google Scholar

González, José M. “The Meaning and Function of Phantasia in Aristotle’s Rhetoric III.1.” Transactions of the American Philological Association, 136 (2006). 99–131.Google Scholar

Gosser, H. Mark. “Kircher and the Lanterna Magica: A Reexamination.” The Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, 90 (1981). 972–978.Google Scholar

Gottesmann, Claude. “The Golden Age of Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Discoveries. I: Lucretius – 1964.” Progress in Neurobiology, 65 (2001). 211–287.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, Robert. Garbo. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux. 2021.Google Scholar

Gow, Gordon. Suspense in the Cinema. London: Zwemmer / New York: Barnes. 1968.Google Scholar

Grau, Oliver. Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. Tr. Gloria Custance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 2003.Google Scholar

Green, Peter (tr. and comm.). Argonautika by Apollonios Rhodios. Expanded ed. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2007.Google Scholar

Green, Peter (tr.). Homer: The Odyssey. Oakland: University of California Press. 2018.Google Scholar

Green, Peter (tr.). Juvenal: The Sixteen Satires. 3rd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1998.Google Scholar

Green, Peter (tr. and comm.). The Poems of Catullus: A Bilingual Edition. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2005. Rpt. 2007.Google Scholar

Greene, Nelson L. “Motion Pictures in the Classroom.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 128 (November 1926). 122–130.Google Scholar

Greenstine, Abraham Jacob. “Accounting for Images in the Sophist.” In Biderman and Weinman (eds.), Plato and the Moving Image. 19–36.Google Scholar

Gregor, Joseph. Das Zeitalter des Films. Vienna: Reinhold, 1932.Google Scholar

Gregoric, Pavel, and Fink, Jakob Leth (eds.). Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. 2021.Google Scholar

Grene, David, and Lattimore, Richmond (eds.). The Complete Greek Tragedies: Euripides V: Electra, The Phoenician Women, The Bacchae. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1959. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Grethlein, Jonas. Aesthetic Experiences and Classical Antiquity: The Significance of Form in Narratives and Pictures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2017. Rpt. 2019.Google Scholar

Grethlein, Jonas. The Ancient Aesthetics of Deception: The Ethics of Enchantment from Gorgias to Heliodorus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2021.Google Scholar

Grethlein, Jonas, and Huitink, Luuk. “Homer’s Vividness: An Enactive Approach.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 137 (2017). 67–91.Google Scholar

Grønstad, Asbjørn. Transfigurations: Violence, Death and Masculinity in American Cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2008.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, Adolf. Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press. 1967.Google Scholar

Guarnieri, Massimo. “The Rise of Light – Discovering Its Secrets.” Proceedings of the IEEE [Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers], 104 no. 2 (2016). 467–473.Google Scholar

Guido, Laurent. “Dancing Dolls and Mechanical Eyes: Tracking an Obsessive Motive from Ballet to Cinema.” In Albera, François and Tortajada, Maria (eds.). Cinema Beyond Film: Media Epistemology in the Modern Era. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2010. 171–191.Google Scholar

Gunning, Tom. “An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Film and the (In)Credulous Spectator.” Art and Text, 34 no. 1 (1989). 31–45.Google Scholar

Gunning, Tom. “Animating the Instant: The Secret Symmetry between Animation and Photography.” In Beckman, Karen Redrobe (ed.). Animating Film Theory. Durham, nc: Duke University Press. 2014. 37–53.Google Scholar

Gunning, Tom. “Animation and Alienation: Bergson’s Critique of the Cinématographe and the Paradox of Mechanical Motion.” The Moving Image, 14 (2014). 1–9.Google Scholar

Gunning, Tom. “The ‘Arrested’ Instant: Between Stillness and Motion.” In Guido, Laurent and Lugon, Olivier (eds.). Between Still and Moving Images. New Barnet: Libbey. 2012. 23–31.Google Scholar

Gunning, Tom. “The Cinema of Attraction: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde.” Wide Angle, 8 nos. 3–4 (Fall, 1986). 63–70. Rev. as “The Cinema of Attraction[s]: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde.” In Strauven, Wanda (ed.). The Cinema of Attractions Reloaded. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2006. 381–388.Google Scholar

Gunning, Tom. “The Play between Still and Moving Images: Nineteenth-Century ‘Philosophical Toys’ and Their Discourse.” In Røssaak, Eivind (ed.). Between Stillness and Motion: Film, Photography, Algorithms. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2011. 27–43.Google Scholar

Gunning, Tom. “The World in Its Own Image: The Myth of Total Cinema.” In Andrew, Dudley with Joubert-Laurencin, Hervé (ed.). Opening Bazin: Postwar Film Theory and Its Afterlife. New York: Oxford University Press. 2011. 119–126.Google Scholar

Hadzsits, George Depue. “Media of Salvation.” Classical Weekly, 14 no. 9 (1920). 70–71.Google Scholar

Hägg, Tomas. Narrative Technique in Ancient Greek Romances: Studies of Chariton, Xenophon Ephesius, and Achilles Tatius. Stockholm: Svenska Institutet i Athen. 1971.Google Scholar

Hägg, Tomas. The Novel in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1983.Google Scholar

Haight, Elizabeth Hazelton. “Ancient Greek Romances and Modern Mystery Stories.” The Classical Journal, 46 (1950). 5–10 and 45.Google Scholar

Hainsworth, J. B. The Idea of Epic. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1991. Rpt. 2022.Google Scholar

Hainsworth, J. B. The Iliad: A Commentary. Vol. 3: Books 9–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1993.Google Scholar

Halliday, Jon. Sirk on Sirk. 2nd ed. London: Faber & Faber. 1997.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2002.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen. Aristotle’s Poetics. London: Duckworth / Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1986.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen. “The Function and Aesthetics of the Greek Tragic Mask.” In Slater, Niall W. and Zimmermann, Bernhard (eds.). Intertextualität in der griechisch-römischen Komödie. Stuttgart: M & P Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung. 1993. 195–211.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen (tr. and comm.). The Poetics of Aristotle: Translation and Commentary. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 1987. Rpt. 2006.Google Scholar

Halliwell, Stephen. “Plato and Painting.” In Keith Rutter, N. and Sparkes, Brian A. (eds.). Word and Image in Ancient Greece. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 2000. 99–116.Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D. W. “Aristotle’s Theory of Motion” (review of Schramm). The Classical Review, 13 (1963). 287–288.Google Scholar

Hanses, Mathias. “Page, Stage, Image: Confronting Ennius with Lucretius’ On the Nature of Things.” In Yona, Sergio and Davis, Gregson (eds.). Epicurus in Rome: Philosophical Perspectives in the Ciceronian Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2022. 147–167.Google Scholar

Hardie, Philip R., Prosperi, Valentina, and Zucca, Diego (eds.). Lucretius Poet and Philosopher: Background and Fortunes of De Rerum Natura. Berlin: De Gruyter. 2020.Google Scholar

Harding, Colin, and Popple, Simon. In The Kingdom of Shadows: A Companion to Early Cinema. London: Cygnus Arts / Madison, nj: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. 1996.Google Scholar

Harris, James [as J. H.]. Three Treatises: Treatise the Second: A Discourse on Music, Painting, and Poetry. London: Woodfall. 1744.Google Scholar

Harrison, George W. M. (ed.). Seneca in Performance. London: Duckworth / The Classical Press of Wales. 2000.Google Scholar

Harrison, Stephen. “Picturing the Future: The Proleptic Ekphrasis from Homer to Vergil.” In Harrison, (ed.). Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001. 70–92.Google Scholar

Harrison, Stephen J. “Picturing the Future Again: Proleptic Ekphrasis in Silius’ Pvnica.” In Augoustakis, Anthony (ed.). Brill’s Companion to Silius Italicus. Leiden: Brill, 2010. 277–292.Google Scholar

Harrison, Tony. “Facing Up to the Muses.” Proceedings of the Classical Association (Great Britain), 85 (1988). 7–29.Google Scholar

Harryhausen, Ray. Film Fantasy Scrapbook. 3rd ed. London: Tantivy Press / San Diego: Barnes. 1981.Google Scholar

Harryhausen, Ray, and Dalton, Tony. The Art of Ray Harryhausen. London: Aurum Press. 2005 / New York: Billboard Books. 2006. Rpt. 2008.Google Scholar

Harryhausen, Ray, and Dalton, Tony. A Century of Stop Motion Animation: From Méliès to Aardman. London: Aurum Press / New York: Billboard Books. 2008.Google Scholar

Harryhausen, Ray, and Dalton, Tony. Ray Harryhausen: An Animated Life. London: Aurum Press. 2003 / New York: Billboard Books. 2004.Google Scholar

Hartigan, Karelisa V. Greek Tragedy on the American Stage: Ancient Drama in the Commercial Theater, 1882–1994. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. 1995.Google Scholar

Hartland, Edwin Sidney. The Legend of Perseus: A Study of Tradition in Story, Custom and Belief. Vol. 3: Andromeda, Medusa. London: Nutt. 1896.Google Scholar

Hartwig, Paul. Die griechischen Meisterschalen der Blüthezeit des strengen rothfigurigen Stiles. Stuttgart: Spemann. 1893.Google Scholar

Haskell, Francis, and Penny, Nicholas. Taste and the Antique: The Lure of Classical Sculpture, 1500–1900. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1981.Google Scholar

Haubold, Johannes. Homer’s People: Epic Poetry and Social Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000.Google Scholar

Hawes, Greta. Rationalizing Myth in Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014.Google Scholar

Hawkins, R., Young, J., and Goodman, H.. “Hugh Joseph Gray, Theater Arts: Los Angeles 1900-1981 Professor Emeritus.” In Krogh, David (ed.). University of California: In Memoriam, 1985. Oakland: University of California. 1985. 159–161. Also at http://texts.cdlib.org/view?docId=hb4d5nb20m&doc.view=frames&chunk.id=div00060&toc.depth=1&toc.id=.Google Scholar

Haynes, Henry W. “Odysseus’ Feat of Archery.” American Journal of Archaeology and of the History of the Fine Arts, 6 (1890). 487.Google Scholar

Hecht, Hermann. Pre-cinema History: An Encyclopaedia and Annotated Bibliography of the Moving Image before 1896. Ed. Hecht, Ann. London: Bowker-Saur / British Film Institute. 1993.Google Scholar

Hediger, Vinzenz. “Can We Have the Cave and Leave It Too? On the Meaning of Cinema as Technology.” In Hidalgo (ed.), Technology and Film Scholarship. 213–238.Google Scholar

Hedreen, Guy. Capturing Troy: The Narrative Function of Landscape in Archaic and Early Classical Greek Art. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 2001.Google Scholar

Heilbron, J. L. The Incomparable Monsignor: Francesco Bianchini’s World of Science, History, and Court Intrigue. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2022.Google Scholar

Heinze, Richard. Virgil’s Epic Technique. Tr. Hazel Harvey, David Harvey and Fred Robertson. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1993.Google Scholar

Hejduk, Julia D. “Facing the Minotaur: Inception (2010) and Aeneid 6.” Arion, 3rd ser., 19 (2011). 93–104.Google Scholar

Helbig, Wolfgang, and Reisch, Emil. Führer durch die öffentlichen Sammlungen klassischer Alterthümer in Rom. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Baedeker. 1891.Google Scholar

Helm, Rudolf. Der antike Roman. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 1956. Originally 1948.Google Scholar

Hepworth, Cecil. Animated Photography: The ABC of the Cinematograph. 2nd ed. New York: Arno. 1970. Originally 1900.Google Scholar

Hepworth, Cecil. “Those Were the Days: Reminiscences by a Pioneer of the Earliest Days of Cinematography.” The Penguin Film Review, 6 (April, 1948). Rpt. in The Penguin Film Review. 2 vols. Rpt. Totowa, nj: Rowman and Littlefield. 1977–1978. Vol. 2. 33–39.Google Scholar

Herbert, Stephen. A History of Pre-Cinema. 3 vols. London: Routledge. 2000. Rpt. 2001.Google Scholar

Herbig, Reinhard. Neue Beobachtungen am Fries der Mysterienvilla in Pompeji: Ein Beitrag zur römischen Wandmalerei in Campanien. Baden-Baden: Grimm. 1958.Google Scholar

Herington, John. Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1985.Google Scholar

Herman, Jan. A Talent for Trouble: The Life of Hollywood’s Most Acclaimed Director, William Wyler. New York: Da Capo. 1997. Originally 1995.Google Scholar

“Herzog Enters ‘The Cave of Forgotten Dreams’.” National Public Radio (April 20, 2011). www.npr.org/2011/04/20/135516812/herzog-enters-the-cave-of-forgotten-dreams.Google Scholar

Heubeck, Alfred, Stephanie, West, and Hainsworth, J. B.. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Vol. 1: Introduction and Books I–VIII. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1988. Rpt. 1990.Google Scholar

Hexter, Ralph. A Guide to the Odyssey: A Commentary on the English Translation of Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Vintage Books. 1993.Google Scholar

Heyme, Hansgünther. “Homer heute.” In Bierl, Anton and von Möllendorff, Peter (eds.). Orchestra: Drama, Mythos, Bühne. Stuttgart and Leipzig: Teubner. 1994. 270–274.Google Scholar

Hidalgo, Santiago (ed.). Technology and Film Scholarship: Experience, Study, Theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 2018.Google Scholar

Highsmith, Patricia. Plotting and Writing Suspense Fiction. Boston: The Writer. 1966.Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, F. W. Der Traum und seine Verwertung für’s Leben: Eine psychologische Studie. Leipzig: Schloemp. 1875.Google Scholar

Hitchcock, Alfred. “Close Your Eyes and Visualize!” Stage (July, 1936). 52–53. Rpt. in Gottlieb, Sidney (ed.). Hitchcock on Hitchcock: Selected Writings and Interviews. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1995. 246–249.Google Scholar

Hochberg, Julian, and Brooks, Virginia. “Movies in the Mind’s Eye.” In Bordwell, David and Carroll, Noël (eds.). Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 1996. 368–387.Google Scholar

Hodenfield, Chris. “Sam Peckinpah Breaks a Bottle.” Rolling Stone (May 13, 1971). 18.Google Scholar

Hogben, Lancelot Thomas. From Cave Painting to Comic Strip: A Kaleidoscope of Human Communication. London: Parrish. 1949.Google Scholar

Hollander, Anne. Moving Pictures. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1991. Originally 1989.Google Scholar

Hollis, A. S. (ed. and comm.). Ovid: Metamorphoses Book VIII. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1970. Several rpts.Google Scholar

Holmberg, Jan. “Ideals of Immersion in Early Cinema.” Cinémas, 14 no. 1 (2003). 129–147.Google Scholar

Holoka, James. P. (ed.). Simone Weil’s The Iliad, or, The Poem of Force: A Critical Edition. New York: Lang 2003. Rpt. 2008.Google Scholar

Holt, Jerry. “‘La Golondrina’: The Secret Text of The Wild Bunch.” In Bliss (ed.), A Uniquely American Epic. 47–64.Google Scholar

Hopwood, Henry V. Living Pictures: Their History, Photo Production and Practical Working. London: The Optician & Practical Trades Review. 1899.Google Scholar

Horak, Laura. “Animating Antiquity.” In Curtis, Scott (eds.). The Image in Early Cinema: Form and Material. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 2018. 47–57.Google Scholar