Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-jks4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-12T16:01:02.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Navigating the Spaciousness of Uncertainties Posed by Global Challenges

A Senses of Place Perspective

from Part VIII - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2021

Christopher M. Raymond
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Finland
Lynne C. Manzo
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle
Daniel R. Williams
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Colorado
Andrés Di Masso
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona
Timo von Wirth
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

We opened this volume with sobering stories of the dire global challenges before us. Indeed, one would not be hard pressed to find stories of the urgency of our various environmental and social crises. While we wrote this book, the COVID-19 pandemic raged, towns in the Arctic reached unprecedented temperatures, countless hectares of forests fell while fossil fuels continued to be violently extracted from the earth, and Black, Indigenous and people of colour continued to be exploited and oppressed. Yet, despite all this, or rather because of it, we wish to begin our conclusion with hope and determination. Drawing on Solnit (2016), we believe that there is a spaciousness in the uncertainties posed by the challenges before us in that they offer new possibilities for being, thinking and acting – for renewal and purposeful redirection in our trajectory – and it is through a reawakened awareness of our rich and dynamic relationships to place that we can find a better way forward.

Type
Chapter
Information
Changing Senses of Place
Navigating Global Challenges
, pp. 331 - 347
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-Schellenberg, E. and Patton, E. (2011) ‘Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 9951004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartel, R. (2014) ‘Vernacular knowledge and environmental law: cause and cure for regulatory failure’, Local Environment, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 891914. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.798636Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2013) Liquid Modernity, Chichester, Wiley.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds) (2008) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borie, M., Gustafsson, K. M., Obermeister, N., Turnhout, E. and Bridgewater, P. (2020) ‘Institutionalising reflexivity? Transformative learning and the intergovernmental science-policy: Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)’, Environmental Science and Policy, vol. 110, pp. 7176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briassoulis, H. (2017) ‘Response assemblages and their socioecological fit: conceptualizing human responses to environmental degradation’, Dialogues in Human Geography, vol. 7, pp. 166185. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820617720079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buijs, A., Hansen, R., Van der Jagt, S., et al. (2019) ‘Mosaic governance for urban green infrastructure: upscaling active citizenship from a local government perspective’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 40, pp. 5362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.011Google Scholar
Caniglia, G., Luederitz, C., von Wirth, T., et al. (2020) ‘A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability’, Nature Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-zGoogle Scholar
Carrozza, C. (2015) ‘Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis’, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 108126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.914894Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. (1996) In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and Transgression, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Cresswell, T. (2011) Mobilities I: catching up. Progress in Human Geography, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 550558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510383348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, T. (2012) ‘Mobilities II: still’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 645653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423349Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1980) Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris, Les.Google Scholar
Di Masso, A. (2015) ‘Micropolitics of public space: on the contested limits of citizenship as a locational practice’, Journal of Social & Political Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 6383. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.322Google Scholar
Di Masso, A., Williams, D. R., Raymond, C. M., et al. (2019) ‘Between fixities and flows: navigating place attachments in an increasingly mobile world’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 125133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.006Google Scholar
Fazey, I., Schäpke, N., Caniglia, G., et al. (2020) ‘Transforming knowledge systems for life on earth: visions of future systems and how to get there’, Energy Research and Social Science, vol. 70, article 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724Google Scholar
Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R. (1993) ‘Science for the post-normal age’, Futures, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 739755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-LGoogle Scholar
Gauchat, G. (2011) ‘The cultural authority of science: public trust and acceptance of organized science’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 20, pp. 751770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510365246Google Scholar
George, C. and Reed, M. G. (2017) ‘Operationalising just sustainability: towards a model for place-based governance’, Local Environment, vol. 22, pp. 11051123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1101059Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991) ‘Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age’, Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goetz, E., Lewis, B., Damiano, A. and Calhoun, M. (2019) ‘The diversity of gentrification. Multiple forms of gentrification in Minneapolis and St. Paul. Center for Urban and Regional Affairs (CURA)’, University of Minnesota. Available at: http://gentrification.umn.edu/sites/gentrification.dl.umn.edu/files/media/diversity-of-gentrification-012519.pdf (accessed 12 April 2020).Google Scholar
Gulsrud, N. M., Hertzog, K. and Shears, I. (2018) ‘Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne? Investigating “green placemaking” as a nature-based solution’, Environmental Research, vol. 161, pp. 158167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005Google Scholar
Hill, G., Kolmes, S., Humphreys, M., McLain, R., and Jones, E. T. (2019) ‘Using decision support tools in multistakeholder environmental planning: restorative justice and subbasin planning in the Columbia River Basin’, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 170186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00548-xGoogle Scholar
Hölscher, K., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T. and Loorbach, D. (2019) ‘Capacities for urban transformations governance and the case of New York City, Cities, vol. 94, pp. 186199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.037Google Scholar
Kelkar, S. (2019) ‘Post-truth and the search for objectivity: political polarization and the remaking of knowledge production’, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, vol. 5, pp. 86106. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.268Google Scholar
King, T. L. (2019) The Black shoals: Offshore formations of Black and Native studies, Durham, NC, Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478005681Google Scholar
Kinnvall, C. and Mitzen, J. (2020) ‘Anxiety, fear, and ontological security in world politics: thinking with and beyond Giddens’, International Theory, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 240256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297192000010XGoogle Scholar
Kirke, X. (2020) ‘Anxiety and COVID-19: the role of ontological security and myth’, E-International Relations [Online]. Available at: www.e-ir.info/2020/05/29/anxiety-and-covid-19-the-role-of-ontological-security-and-myth (accessed 8 December 2020).Google Scholar
Koontz, T. M., Gupta, D., Mudliar, P. and Ranjan, P. (2015) ‘Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: a synthesis framework’, Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 53, no. B, pp. 139–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.003Google Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1960) The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness, London, Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Langhoerst, J. (2018) ‘Enacting landscape democracy: assembling public open space and asserting the right to the city’, in Egoz, S., Jorgenson, K., and Ruggeri, D. (eds), Defining Landscape Democracy: A Path to Spatial Justice. Aldershot, Edward Elgar, pp. 106118.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D., Wittmayer, J., Avelino, F., von Wirth, T. and Frantzeskaki, N. (2020) ‘Transformative innovation and translocal diffusion’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions’, vol 35, pp. 251260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.009Google Scholar
Marulanda, A. and Martí, M. (2019) ‘Desafiando la gentrificación. Resistencias a los desplazamientos en los centros históricos de Quito y Cuenca’. Scripta Nova, vol. 13, no. 607, pp. 127.Google Scholar
Moore, M.-L., Olsson, P., Nilsson, W., Rose, L. and Westley, F. R. (2018) ‘Navigating emergence and system reflexivity as key transformative capacities: experiences from a Global Fellowship program’, Ecology and Society, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10166-230238Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. (2009) Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity and Policy, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Muiderman, K., Gupta, A., Vervoort, J. and Biermann, F. (2020) ‘Four approaches to anticipatory climate governance: different conceptions of the future and implications for the present’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. e673. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.673Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1986) The View from Nowhere, New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. J., Eriksen, S., Taylor, M., et al. (2020) ‘Beyond technical fixes: climate solutions and the great derangement’, Climate and Development, vol. 12, no. 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. (2010) ‘Anticipation, climate change, and movement in Greenland’, Les Inuit et le changement climatique/The Inuit and Climate Change, vol. 34, pp. 2137.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J. (2013) ‘Time, a slippery challenge. Bulletin of People–Environment Studies’, vol. 39, pp. 813.Google Scholar
Quay, M. (2010) ‘Anticipatory governance: a tool for climate change adaptation’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 496511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2010.508428Google Scholar
Raymond, C. M., Kaaronen, R., Giusti, M., Linder, N. and Barthel, S. (2021) ‘Engaging with the pragmatics of relational thinking, leverage points and transformations: a reply to West et al. 2020. Ecosystems and People, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1867645Google Scholar
Relph, T. (1976) Place and Placelessness, London, Pion Limited.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. and Walsh, T. (2018) ‘Reflexivity and critical pedagogy’, in Ryan, A. and Walsh, T. (eds), Reflexivity and Critical Pedagogy, Leiden, Brill Sense, pp. 114. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004384507Google Scholar
Schaab, G. L. (2013) ‘Relational ontology’, in Runehov, A. L. C., and Oviedo, L. (eds), Encyclopedia of Sciences and Religions, Dordrecht, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_847Google Scholar
Sibley, D. (1995) Geographies of Exclusion: Society and Difference in the West, East Sussex, Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203430545Google Scholar
Soja, E. (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice, Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solnit, R. (2016) Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities, Chicago, Haymarket Press.Google Scholar
Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., et al. (2017) ‘Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond: lessons learned for sustainability’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability vols 26–27, pp. 1725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005Google Scholar
Tsing, A. L. (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton, Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77bccGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E. (1988). ‘Size, scaling, and the evolution of complex life cycles’. In Size-Structured Populations. Berlin: Springer, pp. 6081.Google Scholar
West, S., Jamila Haider, L., Stålhammar, S. and Woroniecki, S. (2020) ‘A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations’, Ecosystems and People, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 304325. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. (2013) ‘Science, practice, and place’, in Stewart, W. P., Williams, D. R. and Kruger, L. E. (eds), Place-Based Conservation: Perspectives from the Social Sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 2134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5802-5Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. (2018) ‘Spacing conservation practice: place-making, social learning, and adaptive governance in natural resource management’, in Marsden, T. (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Nature, vol. 1, London, SAGE Publications, pp. 285303.Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. and Van Patten, S. R. (2006) ‘Home and away? Creating identities and sustaining places in a multicentered world’, in McIntyre, N., Williams, D. R. and McHugh, K. E. (eds), Multiple Dwelling and Tourism: Negotiating Place, Home, and Identity, Cambridge, CABI Publishing, pp. 3250.Google Scholar
Wyborn, C. (2015) ‘Co-productive governance: a relational framework for adaptive governance’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 30, pp. 5667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.009Google Scholar
Wyborn, C., Yung, L., Murphy, D. and Williams, D. R. (2015) ‘Situating adaptation: how governance challenges and perceptions of uncertainty influence adaptation in the Rocky Mountains’, Regional Environmental Change, vol. 15, pp. 669682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0663-3Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×