Book contents
- Frontmatter
- PART ONE FROM c. 1800 TO THE 1930s
- 1 The Establishment of the Colonial Régimes
- 2 Political Structures in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries
- 3 International Commerce, the State and Society: Economic and Social Change
- 4 Religion and Anti-Colonial Movements
- 5 Nationalism and Modernist Reform
- PART TWO FROM WORLD WAR II TO THE PRESENT
- Bibliographies
- References
4 - Religion and Anti-Colonial Movements
from PART ONE - FROM c. 1800 TO THE 1930s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
- Frontmatter
- PART ONE FROM c. 1800 TO THE 1930s
- 1 The Establishment of the Colonial Régimes
- 2 Political Structures in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries
- 3 International Commerce, the State and Society: Economic and Social Change
- 4 Religion and Anti-Colonial Movements
- 5 Nationalism and Modernist Reform
- PART TWO FROM WORLD WAR II TO THE PRESENT
- Bibliographies
- References
Summary
The period from the mid-nineteenth to the early twentieth centuries in Southeast Asia was one of increased turmoil concomitant with intensified European penetration, political consolidation by the dominant states, and the economic transformation of the countryside. European records of this period evidence a multitude of resistance movements, popular rebellions, acts of insubordination and other assertions on the part of the colonial ‘other’. Since wars and rebellions have always been the stuff of which traditional histories have been written, it should be of no surprise that many of the charismatic leaders and their movements in the present study have already been mentioned in the general histories of Southeast Asia. But, in general, they have not been treated in their own terms; they figure as momentary interruptions of the grand sagas of colonial conquest, nationalism, modernization or state construction. In colonial records these phenomena are simply ‘disturbances’, sometimes ‘aberrations’, their perpetrators reduced to the status of dacoits or fanatics often led by crazed monks, popes, and prophets. Post-colonial writers, on the other hand, have appropriated such movements for their narratives of nationalist opposition to colonial rule.
More recently, such movements have been viewed as primitive precursors of modern, more successful, sociopolitical movements. Harry Benda must be credited with establishing a hierarchy of types that has provided subsequent scholars with a persuasive means of classifying the otherwise confusing and regionally-diverse data. The most primitive form of peasant movement, of which the 1890s Samin movement in Java is cited as an example, is characterized as rural-based, backward-looking, lacking organization, spontaneous and irrational.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia , pp. 197 - 248Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1993
References
- 1
- Cited by