Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-t4qhp Total loading time: 2.518 Render date: 2022-08-14T06:47:18.454Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Part III - Technology in Training and Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

Richard N. Landers
University of Minnesota
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Jr., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50, 341358. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.1997.tb00911.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antin, J. & Churchill, E. F. (2011). Badges in social media: A social psychological perspective. In CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings (pp. 14). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. B. & Landers, R. N. (2017). An evaluation of gamified training: Using narrative to improve reactions and learning. Simulation & Gaming, 48, 513538. doi:10.1177/1046878117703749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ArthurJr, W., BennettJr, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: a meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 234245. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.88.2.234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedwell, W. L., Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2012). Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning: An empirical study. Simulation & Gaming, 43, 729760. doi:10.1177/1046878112439444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blohm, I. & Leimeister, J. M. (2013). Gamification. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5, 275278. doi:10.1007/s12599-013–0273-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36, 10651105. doi:10.1177/0149206309352880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogost, I. (2011). Gamification is bullshit. In Waltz, S. P. & Deterding, S. (Eds.), The Gameful World (pp. 6579). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, K. G. (2001). Using computers to deliver training: Which employees learn and why? Personnel Psychology, 54, 271296. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.2001.tb00093.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, K., Anand, C., & Gosse, E. (2014). Gamification and serious game approaches for adult literacy tablet software. Entertainment Computing, 5(3), 135146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, L. A. & Hutchins, H. M. (2007). Training transfer: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 6, 263296. doi:10.1177/1534484307303035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 132. doi:10.1007/s11162-005–8150-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678707. doi:10.1037//0021–9010.g5.5.678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, W. R., Hampton, R., & Howell, R. D. (1989). Career versus organizational commitment: Antecedents and consequences of retail salespeople's commitment. Journal of Retailing, 65, 80106.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self‐determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K. E., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a definition. Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop, Vancouver, BC. doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040.CrossRef
Ferster, C. B. & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement (pp. 44137). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi:–004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, J. K., Quiñones, M. A., Sego, D. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1992). Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology, 45, 511527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foxon, M. (1997). The influence of motivation to transfer, action planning, and manager support on the transfer process. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10, 4263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, M. & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331362. doi:10.1002/job.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441467. doi: Scholar
Gartner. (2012). Gartner says by 2014, 80 percent of current gamified applications will fail to meet business objectives primarily due to poor design [press release]. Retrieved from
Graham, S. & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445476. doi:10.1037/0022–0663.99.3.445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, B. S., Sherry, J., Lachlan, K., Lucas, K., & Holmstrom, A. (2010). Orientations to video games among gender and age groups. Simulation & Gaming, 41, 238259. doi:10.1177/1046878108319930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamari, J. & Koivisto, J. (June 2013). Social motivations to use gamification: An empirical study of gamifying exercise. In ECIS 2013 Completed Research.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (January 2014). Does gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 30253034). IEEE.Google Scholar
Heeter, C., Lee, Y. H., Magerko, B., & Medler, B. (2011). Impacts of forced serious game play on vulnerable subgroups. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations (IJGCMS), 3, 3453. doi:10.4018/jgcms.2011070103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, S. H., Chang, J. W., & Lee, C. C. (2013). Designing attractive gamification features for collaborative storytelling websites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 428435. ScholarPubMed
Kanfer, R. (1991). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 1, pp. 75170.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 657690.–9010.74.4.657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13, 39.Google Scholar
Koivisto, J. & Hamari, J. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 179188. doi: Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2002). Creating, implementing, and managing effective training and development: State-of-the-art lessons for practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311328.–9010.78.2.311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. L. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50, 525544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N. (2015). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45, 752768. doi:10.1177/1046878114563660(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N., Auer, E. M., Collmus, A. B. & Armstrong, M. B. (2018). Gamification science, its history and future: Definitions and a research agenda. Simulation & Gaming 49, 315337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N. & Armstrong, M. B. (2015). Enhancing instructional outcomes with gamification: An empirical test of the technology-enhanced training effectiveness model. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 499507. Scholar
Landers, R. N. & Callan, R. C. (2011). Casual social games as serious games: The psychology of gamification in undergraduate education and employee training. In Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., & Jain, L. C. (Eds.), Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 399423). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978–1-4471–2161-9_20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N. & Callan, R. C. (2012). Training evaluation in virtual worlds: Development of a model. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 5, 120. doi:10.4101/jvwr.v5i3.6335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N. & Goldberg, A. S. (2014). Online social media in the workplace: A conversation with employees. In Coovert, M. D. & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), Psychology of workplace technology (pp. 284306). New York, NY: Routledge Academic..Google Scholar
Landers, R. N., Armstrong, M. B., & Collmus, A. B. (2017). How to use game elements to enhance learning: Applications of the theory of gamified learning. In Ma, M., Oikonomou, A., & Jain, L. C. (Eds.), Serious games and edutainment applications (vol. 2, pp. 457483). Surrey, UK: Springer. doi:10.1007/978–3-319–51645-5_21.Google Scholar
Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C. (2017). Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 508515. Scholar
Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., Callan, R. C., & Armstrong, M. B. (2015). Psychological theory and the gamification of learning. In Reiners, T. & Wood, L. (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 165186). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P. & Locke, E. A. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P. & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212247.–5978(91)90021-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, E. E. & Suttle, J. L. (1973). Expectancy theory and job behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 482503.–5073(73)90066–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, D. H. (2001). The effect of work experience and job position on international learning transfer. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 9, 5974.Google Scholar
Linehan, C., Kirman, B. & Roche, B. (2015) Gamification as behavioral psychology. In Walz, S. P. & Deterding, S. (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 81105). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705717. ScholarPubMed
Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265268. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8721.2006.00449.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, T. W. (1981). Towards a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 4, 333369. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Jackson, G. T., & Graesser, A. (2010). Intelligent tutoring and games (TaG). In Baek, Y. (Ed.), Gaming for classroom-based learning: Digital role playing as a motivator of study (pp. 4465). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekler, E. D., Brühlmann, F., Tuch, A. N., & Opwis, K. (2017). Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 525534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, D. & Chen, S. (2005). Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform. Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Motivation: New direction for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 8088. doi:10.5465/AMR.1982.4285467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollick, E. R. & Rothbard, N. (2014). Mandatory fun: Consent, gamification and the impact of games at work. The Wharton School Research Paper Series. Retrieved from:
Noe, R. A. & Schmitt, N. (1986). The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology, 39, 497523. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.1986.tb00950.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417528. doi:10.1111/0023–8333.00136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Muhammad, R. S. (2013). Organizational culture and climate. In Weiner, I. B. (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology (2nd edn., pp. 643676). Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1222.Google Scholar
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parijat, P. & Bagga, S. (2014). Victor Vroom’s expectancy theory of motivation: An evaluation. International Research Journal of Business and Management (IRJBM), 7, 18.Google Scholar
Parker, L. E. & Lepper, M. R. (1992). Effects of fantasy contexts on children’s learning and motivation: Making learning more fun. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 625633. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.62.4.625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2015). Studying gamification: The effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In Reiners, T., Wood, L. C. (Eds.), Gamification in Education and Business (pp. 2146). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978–3-319–10208-5_2.Google Scholar
RoedigerIII, H. L. & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249255. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01693.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 14321463. doi:10.1037/a0037559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 5467. ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68. ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 344360. doi:10.1007/s11031-006–9051-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., & Klevers, M. (2013). Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. IxD&A, 19, 2837.Google Scholar
Seaborn, K. & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 1431. Scholar
Seidel, T. & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454499. doi:10.3102/0034654307310317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, K. M. & Filak, V. (2008). Manipulating autonomy, competence, and relatedness support in a game‐learning context: New evidence that all three needs matter. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 267283. doi:10.1348/014466607X238797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, W. C. M., Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Evans, D. A. (June 2016). Gamified Technology-Mediated Learning: the Role of Individual differences. In PACIS 2013 Proceedings (p. 47).
Singer, L., & Schneider, K. (June 2012). It was a bit of a race: Gamification of version control. In Games and Software Engineering (GAS), 2012 2nd International Workshop on (pp. 58). IEEE. doi:10.1109/GAS.2012.6225927.CrossRef
Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta‐analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer‐based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64, 489528. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.2011.01190.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Staddon, J. E. & Cerutti, D. T. (2003). Operant conditioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 115144. ScholarPubMed
Stansbury, J. A. & Earnest, D. R. (2017). Meaningful gamification in an industrial/organizational psychology course. Teaching of Psychology, 44, 3845. Scholar
Surface, E. A. (2012). Training needs assessment: Aligning learning and capability with performance requirements and organizational objectives. In Wilson, M. A., Bennett, W., Jr., Gibson, S. G., & Alliger, G. M. (Eds.), Series in applied psychology. The handbook of work analysis: Methods, systems, applications and science of work measurement in organizations (pp. 437462). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., and Organ, A. (2010), Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60: 758777. doi:10.1111/j.1460–2466.2010.01513.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tay, L. (2010). Employers: Look to gaming to motivate staff. itnews for Australian Business. Retrieved from,employers-look-to-gaming-to-motivate-staff.aspx.
Thiel, S. K., Reisinger, M., & Röderer, K. (December 2016). I’m too old for this!: influence of age on perception of gamified public participation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (pp. 343–346). ACM. doi:10.1145/3012709.3016073.CrossRef
Vancouver, J. B. (2008). Integrating self-regulation theories of work motivation into a dynamic process theory. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 118. Scholar
Vancouver, J. B. & Day, D. V. (2005). Industrial and organisation research on self‐regulation: from constructs to applications. Applied Psychology, 54, 155185. doi:10.1111/j.1464–0597.2005.00202.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Ahn, L. & Dabbish, L. (2008). Designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM, 51. 5867. doi:10.1145/1378704.1378719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Warr, P. & Bunce, D. (1995). Trainee characteristics and the outcomes of open learning. Personnel Psychology, 48, 347375. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.1995.tb01761.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, R., Meiers, M. W., & Visser, Y. (2012). A guide to assessing needs: Essential tools for collecting information, making decisions, and achieving development results. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J. L., … Conkey, C. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 217266. doi:10.1177/1046878108321866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeiler, M. D. (1968). Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 405414. doi:10.1901/jeab.1968.11–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, C. M. & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alavi, M., Wheeler, B. C., & Valacich, J. S. (1995). Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative tele-learning. MIS Quarterly, 19, 293312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alavi, M., Yoo, Y., & Vogel, D. R. (1997). Using information technology to add value to management education. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 13101333.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D. (2007). Mentoring relationships from the perspective of the mentor. In Ragins, B. R. & Kram, K. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 123148). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1): 127136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, M. B. & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arbaugh, J. P. (2005). Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 135149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbaugh, J. P. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 435447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D. E., Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2012). The lure of the virtual. Organization Science, 23(5), 14851504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ba, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bempechat, J., London, P., & Dweck, C. (1991). Children’s conceptions of ability in major domains: An interview and experimental study. Child Study Journal, 21, 1136.Google Scholar
Blake-Beard, S. D., O’Neill, R. M., & McGowan, E. M. (2007). Blind dates? The importance of matching in successful formal mentoring relationships. In Ragins, B. R. and Kram, K. E. (Eds.). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, practice (pp. 617632). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Blass, F. R., Brouer, R. L., Perrewe, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. 2007. Politics understanding ability and networking ability as a function of mentoring: The roles of gender and race. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14(2): 93105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, C. (April 23, 2015). Are remote workers better workers? Business News Daily. Retrieved from
Carlson, J. R. & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 153170.Google Scholar
Casselman, B. (2015). Enough already about the job-hopping millennials, FiveThirtyEight – Economics (May 5). Retrieved August 25, 2017, from
Chandler, D. E., Kram, K. E., & Yip, J. (2001). An ecological perspective on mentoring at work: A review and future prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 519570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Janasz, S. C., Ensher, E. A. & Heun, C. (2008). Using e-mentoring to connect business students with practicing managers: Virtual relationships and real benefits. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(4), 394411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Janasz, S. C. & Godshalk, V. M. (2013). The role of e-mentoring in protégés’ learning and satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 743774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Janasz, S. C. & Peiperl, M. A. (2015). CEOs need mentors too. Harvard Business Review, 93(4), 100103.Google Scholar
de Janasz, S. C., Sullivan, S. E., & Whiting, V. R. (2003). Mentor networks and career success: Lessons for turbulent times. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4),: 7891.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
DeLong, T.J., Gabarro, R.J., & Lees, J.J. (2008). Why Mentoring matters in a hypercompetitive world. Harvard Business Review (January), 115121.
DeRouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., Salas, E. 2005. E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 31(6), 920940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiRenzo, M. S., Linnehan, F., Shao, P., & Rosenberg, W. L. (2010). A moderated mediation model of e-mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 292305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrow, S. R., Chandler, D. E., Murphy, W. M., & Kram, K. E. (2012) A review of developmental networks: Incorporating a mutuality perspective. Journal of Management, 38(1), pp. 210242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eby, L. T. & Lockwood, A. (2005). Protégés and mentors’ reactions to participating in formal programs: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 441458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensher, E. A., Grant-Vallone, E. J., & Marelich, W. (2002). Effects of perceived attitudinal and demographic similarity on protégés support and satisfaction gained through their mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 14071430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 264288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensher, E. A. & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Effects of race, gender, perceived similarity, and contact on mentor relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 460481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensher, E. A. & Murphy, S. E. (2007). E-mentoring: Next-generation research and strategies. In Ragins, B. R. & Kram, K. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 299322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Forret, M. L. & Dougherty, T. W. (2001). Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees. Group & Organization Management, 26, 283311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, L. (July, 2007). Mentoring makeover: How the web is transforming the entire mentoring process. Training and Development, 61(7), 5257.Google Scholar
Fuller, R. M., Vician, C., & Brown, S. A. (2006). E-learning and individual characteristics: The role of computer anxiety and communication apprehension. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46, 103115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallup. (2016). How millennials want to work and live: The six big changes leaders have to make. Washington, DC: Gallup.
Gaskill, L. R. (1991). Same-sex and cross-sex mentoring of female protégés: A comparative analysis. Career Development Quarterly, 40, 4863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godshalk, V. M. & Sosik, J. 2003. Aiming for career success: The role of learning goal orientation in mentoring relationships.Journal of Vocational Behavior 63, 417437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, P., Nelson, T., & Glassman, A. (2004). The Millennial generation: A strategic opportunity. Organizational Analysis, 12(3), 255270.Google Scholar
Gould, S. 1979. Characteristics of career planners in upwardly mobile occupations. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 539550.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 13601380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant-Vallone, E. J. & Ensher, E. A. (2000). Effects of peer mentoring on types of mentor support, program satisfaction, and graduate student stress: A dyadic perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 637642.Google Scholar
Hall, D. T. 2002. Careers in and out of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hall, D. T. & Foster, L. W. 1977. A psychological success cycle and goal setting: Goals, performance, and attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 20(2), 282290.Google Scholar
Hamilton, B. A. & Scandura, T. A. (2003). E-mentoring: Implications for organizational learning and development in a wired world. Organizational Dynamics, 31, 388402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface and deep level diversity or work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96107.Google Scholar
Harter, J., Agrawal, S., & Sorenson, S. (2014). Most U.S. workers see upside to staying connected to work. Gallup Inc. R.eved June 29, 2016, from
Higgins, M. C., Chandler, D. E., & Kram, K. E. (2007). Developmental initiation and developmental networks. In Ragins, B. R. & Kram, K. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 349372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Higgins, M.C. & Kram, K.E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 264288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1995). A suggested structure for a science of a relationship. Personnel Relationships, 2, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, A., Kessler, E. H., & Francesco, A. M. (2004). Student networking behavior, culture, and grade performance: An empirical study and pedagogical recommendation. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(2), 139150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151188.).Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G. (1983). Analyzing close relationships. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 2067). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Koberg, C. S., Boss, R. W., & Goodman, E. (1998). Factors and outcomes associated with mentoring among health-care professionals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 5872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
Lewis, (2002). Telementoring: A teacher’s perspective of the effectiveness of the international telementor program. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(1).Google Scholar
Makarius, E. & Larson, B. (2017). Changing the perspective of virtual work: Building virtual intelligence at the individual level, Academy of Management Perspectives, 31, 159178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, K. K. & Sadaghiani, K. 2010). Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance, Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molinari, C., Freshman, B., & Tan, R. Y. 2015). Mindful awareness training in online and face-to-face learning environments: A comparative analysis, The Journal of Health Administration Education, 32(4), 579604.Google Scholar
Murphy, W. M. (2011). From e-mentoring to blended mentoring: Increasing students’ developmental initiation and mentors’ satisfaction. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 606622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, W. M. & Kram, K. E. (2010). Understanding nonwork relationships in developmental networks. Career Development International, 15(7): 637663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olian, J. D., Carroll, S. J., Giannantonio, C. M., & Feren, D. B. (1988). What do protégés look for in a mentor? Results of three experimental studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 33, 1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, D. M. (March, 2006). Virtual mentoring. HR Magazine, 51(3), 105107.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K. & Scandura, T. A. 2005. Construct equivalence across groups: An unexplored issue in mentoring research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(2), 323335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, S. R. & Myers, K. K. (2017). Millennials in the workplace: Research findings and managerial implications. In Sharabi, M. (Ed.), Generational differences in work values and work ethic: An international perspective (pp.163182). Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
P-Sontag, L., Vappie, K., & Wanberg, C. R. (2007). The practice of mentoring: MENTTIUM Corporation. In Ragins, B. R. and Kram, K. E. (Eds.). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, practice (pp. 593616). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 11771194.Google Scholar
Ragins, B. R. & Kram, K. E. (2007). The roots and meaning of mentoring. In Ragins, B. R. & Kram, K. E. (Eds.), The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research and practice (pp. 315). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Raines, C. (2002). Connecting generations: The sourcebook for a new workplace. Berkeley, CA: Crisp Publications.Google Scholar
Randstad Work Solutions (2007). The world of work 2007. Retrieved July 26, 2009, from:
Reyt, J. N. & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2015). Seeing the forest for the trees: Exploratory learning, mobile technology, and knowledge workers’ boundary integration behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 739782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Single, P. B. & Single, R. M. (2005). E-mentoring for social equity: Review of research to inform program development. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13, 301320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Scielzo, S. A., Yarbrough, C. S., & Rosopa, P. J. (2008). A comparison of face-to-face and electronic peer-mentoring: Interactions with mentor gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM). (2009). The multigenerational workforce: Opportunity for competitive success. Retrieved July 26, 2009, from
Sproull, L. & Kiesler, S. (1999). Computers, networks and work. Scientific American, 265, 116123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, S. E. (1999). The changing nature of careers: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 25, 457484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (May 10, 2016). 4 Organizational mistakes that plague modern knowledge workers. Harvard Business Review, May. Retrieved from
Torkzadeh, G., Pflughoeft, K., & Hall, L. (1999). Computer user attitudes, training effectiveness, and self-efficacy: An empirical study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18, 299309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turban, D. B. & Dougherty, T. W. (1994). Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 688702.Google Scholar
Turban, D. B., Dougherty, T. W., & Lee, F. K. (2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 240262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turban, D. B. & Lee, F. K. (2007). The role of personality in mentoring relationships: Formation, dynamics, and outcomes. In Ragins, B. R. & Kram, K. E. (Eds.). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 2150). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
van Emmerik, I. J. H. (2004). The more you can get the better: Mentoring constellations and intrinsic career success. Career Development International, 9, 578594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanberg, C. R., Kammeyer-Mueller, J., & Marchese, M. (2006). Mentor and protégé predictors and outcomes of mentoring in a formal mentoring program. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 410423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanberg, C. R., Kanfer, R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of networking intensity among unemployed job seekers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 491503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wanberg, C. R., Welsh, E. T., & Hezlett, S. A. (2003). Mentoring research: A review and dynamic process model. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22(1), 39124.Google Scholar
Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., Kraimer, M. L., & Graf, I. K. (1999). The role of human capital, motivation and supervisor sponsorship in predicting career success. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(5), 577595.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, F. J. & Lankau, M. J. (2011). Formal mentoring programs: A mentor-centric and longitudinal analysis. Journal of Management, 37(6), 15271557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1999). Net surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual community as community. In Wellman, B. (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 331367). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Abel, A. L., Ray, R. L., & Nair, S. (2016). Global Executive Coaching Survey 2016. The Conference Board.
After Moore’s law: The future of computing. (March 12, 2016). The Economist . Retrieved January 16, 2018, from
Aguilera, A., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., Demasi, O., & Avila, P. (2017). Automated text messaging as an adjunct to cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: A clinical trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(5), e148. ScholarPubMed
AIIR Consulting. (2018). Usage and Survey Data (Version 4). [Data file]. Philadelphia, PA: AIIR Consulting.
Backhaus, A., Agha, Z., Maglione, M. L., Repp, A., Ross, B., Zuest, D., Thorp, S. R. (2012). Videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review. Psychological Services, 9(2), 111131. ScholarPubMed
Barney, M. F. (2015). Amplifying leaders: Using quantified self technologies to grow leaders like Olympians. California: LeaderAmp Press.Google Scholar
Barney, M. F. & Goparaju, S. (2017). Better coaching: Elevating potential and performance with innovative methods. California: LeaderAmp Press.Google Scholar
Berrouiguet, S., Baca-García, E., Brandt, S., Walter, M., & Courtet, P. (2016). Fundamentals for future mobile-health (mHealth): A systematic review of mobile phone and web-based text messaging in mental health. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6), e135. ScholarPubMed
Berry, R. M., Ashby, J. S., Gnilka, P. B., & Matheny, K. B. (2011). A comparison of face-to-face and distance coaching practices: Coaches’ perceptions of the role of the working alliance in problem resolution. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63, 243253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, S. V. & Picano, J. J. (2006). Dimensions of coaching related to productivity and quality of life. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58, 232239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, D. (2018). Intel made smart glasses that look normal. Exclusive first look at Vaunt, which uses retinal projection to put a display in your eyeball. Downloaded February 5, 2018, from
Boyce, L. A. & Clutterbuck, D. (2011). E-coaching: Accept it, it’s here, and it’s evolving! In Hernez-Broome, G. & Boyce, L. A. (Eds.), Advancing executive coaching: Setting the course for successful leadership coaching (pp. 285–215). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Boyce, L. A. & Hernez-Broome, G. (2010). E-coaching: Consideration of leadership coaching in a virtual environment. In Clutterbuck, D. & Hussain, Z. (Eds.), Virtual coach, virtual mentor (pp. 139174). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Charbonneau, M. A. (2002). Participant self-perceptions about the cause of behavior change from a program of executive coaching . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, Los Angeles, CA.
Church, K. & de Oliveira, R. (2013). What’s up with WhatsApp?: Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 352361). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Clutterbuck, D. & Hussain, Z. (2010).Virtual coach, virtual mentor. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Cooper, S. E. & Neal, C. (2015). Consultants’ use of telepractice: Practitioner survey, issues, and resources.Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67(2), 8599. Scholar
Corbett, K. & Valeri, J. (2016).The eleventh annual executive coaching survey. Cincinnati, OH: Sherpa Consulting.Google Scholar
Coutu, D. & Kaufmann, C. (2009). The realities of executive coaching . HBR Business Report.Google Scholar
Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R., Lengel, R., & Trevino, L. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems.MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355366. doi:10.2307/248682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A., & Watts, L. (1998). Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: Fluency and awareness of attentional focus.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49(1), 2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, D. V. & Lance, C. E. (2004). Understanding the development of leadership complexity through latent growth modeling. In Day, D. V., Zacarro, S. J., & Halpin, S. M. (Eds.), Leader development for transforming organizations: Growing leaders for tomorrow (pp. 4169). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, S. X. & Schneider, P. L. (2002). Psychotherapy using distance technology: A comparison of face-to-face, video, and audio treatment.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 499503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desrosiers, E., Ghods, N., Grubb, A., McHenry, J., & Nieberding, A. O. (2017). Coaching in Organizations: Today’s reality and future decisions. Panel presentation in “Innovations in Executive Coaching: Deepening Your Expertise in a Dynamic World” The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 13th Annual Leading Edge Consortium, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Dubey, H., Mehl, M. R., & Mankodiya, K. (2016). BigEar: Inferring the ambient and emotional correlates from smartphone-based acoustic big data. ArXiv:1606.03636 [cs.SD], DOI10.1109/CHASE.2016.46.
Frazee, R. V. (2008). E-coaching in organizations: A study of features, practices, and determinants of use . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114(c), 254280. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019#.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geissler, H., Hasenbein, M., Kanatouri, S., & Wegner, R. (2014). E-coaching: Conceptual and empirical findings of a virtual coaching programme. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 12(2), 165187.Google Scholar
Ghods, N. (2009). Distance coaching: The relationship between the coach-client relationship, client satisfaction, and coaching outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University, San Diego, CA.
Ghods, N. & Boyce, C. (2012). Virtual coaching and mentoring. In Passmore, J., Peterson, D. B., & Freire, T. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of coaching and mentoring (pp. 501523). Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghods, N. & Kovach, R. (2017). Disrupting a thriving practice in the face of new business demands: Cisco’s Story. Presentation in “The Next Wave of Leadership: Accelerating Development, Increasing Impact” The Society of Consulting Psychology Conference, Seattle, WA.
Goldsmith, M. & Lyons, L. S. (2006). Coaching for leadership: The practice of leadership coaching from the world’s greatest coaches (2nd edn.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Grove, A. S. (1995). High Output Management. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Gurbaxani, V. (April 20, 2016). You don’t have to be a software company to think like one. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from
Hagevik, S. (1998). Choosing a career counseling service. Journal of Environmental Health, 98(4), 3132.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2000). Virtual coaching: Learning, like time, stops for no one.Journal for Quality and Participation, 23(1), 4244.Google Scholar
Hernez-Broome, G., Boyce, L. A., Whyman, W. (2007). Critical Issues of Coaching with Technology. In L. A. Boyce & G. Hernez-Broome (Chair), E-coaching: Supporting leadership coaching with technology. Symposium conducted at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York, NY.
Hudson, F. M. (1999).The handbook of coaching: A comprehensive resource guide for managers, executives, consultants, and human resource professionals. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ingram, M. (March 24, 2016). Microsoft’s chat-bot was fun for awhile, until it turned into a racist. Fortune. Downloaded January 22, 2018, from
International Coach Federation & PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2016).2016 ICF Global Coaching Study.
Jarvis, J. (June 2004). Coaching and buying coaching services: A guide (Reference No. 2995). London, UK: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1931). Essays in Persuasion. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kilburg, R. R. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching.Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48, 134144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilburg, R. R. (1997). Coaching and executive character core problems and basic approaches.Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 49, 281299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilburg, R. R. (2000). Executive coaching: Developing managerial wisdom in a world of chaos. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N. & Landers, A. K. (2014). An empirical test of the theory of gamified learning: The effect of leaderboards on time-on-task and academic performance.Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 769785. doi:10.1177/1046878114563662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linley, P. A. (2006). Coaching research: Who? what? when? why? International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 4(2), 17. Retrieved August 7, 2007, from Scholar
Liu, W. L., Zhang, K., Locatis, C., & Ackerman, M. (2015). Cloud and traditional videoconferencing technology for telemedicine and distance learning.Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 21(5), 422426. ScholarPubMed
Luxton, D. D., McCann, R. A., Bush, N. E., Mishkind, M. C., & Reger, G. M. (2011). mHealth for mental health: Integrating smartphone technology in behavioral healthcare. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(6), 505512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mausbach, B. T., Moore, R., Roesch, S., Cardenas, V., & Patterson, T. L. (2010). The relationship between homework compliance and therapy outcomes: An updated meta-analysis.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34(5), 429438.–9297-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, A. N. (2016). Media diaries. A comparison of three approaches to electronic media diaries.Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 171179. doi:10.1080/08824096.2016.1224172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moubayed, N. A., Vazquez-Alvarez, Y., McKay, A., & Vinciarelli, A. (November 3–7, 2014). Face-Based Automatic Personality Perception. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Orlando, Florida, pp. 11531156. doi:10.1145/2647868.2655014.CrossRef
O’Brien, M. (1997). Executive coaching. Supervision, 58(4), 68.Google Scholar
Otte, S., Bangerter, A., Britsch, M., & Wüthrich, U. (2014). Attitudes of coaches towards the use of computer-based technology in coaching.Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 66(1), 3852. Scholar
Pascal, A., Sass, M., Gregory, J., & Kaiser, R. B. (2015). I’m only human: The role of technology in coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67(2), 100109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passarelli, A. M., Van Oosten, E. B., Varley, A., & Trinh, M. P. (2017). Effect of coaching modality on coaching effectiveness. Paper presented in symposium “High-tech or High-touch? Developmental Relationships in the Digital Age” Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta, GA. Showcase Symposium, Best Symposium Award, MED Division.
Peterson, D. B. (1996). Executive coaching at work: The art of one-on-one change.Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48, 7886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. (2016). Reinventing executive coaching: Seven paths forward. Invited keynote, The Future of Coaching: Building Bridges and Expanding Boundaries. Columbia Coaching Learning Association (CCLA). New York, NY.
Peterson, D. (2017). Imagining the future of executive coaching. Keynote presentation in “Innovations in Executive Coaching: Deepening Your Expertise in a Dynamic World” The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 13th Annual Leading Edge Consortium, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rees, C. & Haythornthwaite, S. (2004). Telepsychology and videoconferencing: Issues, opportunities and guidelines for psychologists. Australian Psychologist, 39(3), 212219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, C. S. & Stone, S. (2005). Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face versus videoconferenced psychotherapy.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(6), 649653.–7028.36.6.649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, L. K., Frueh, B. C., Grubaugh, A. L., Egede, L., & Elhai, J. D. (2009). Current directions in videoconferencing tele-mental health research.Clinical Psychology : A Publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 16(3), 323338.–2850.2009.01170.x.Google ScholarPubMed
Rock, M. L, Zigmond, N. P., Gregg, M., & Gable, R. A. (2011). The power of virtual coaching. Educational Leadership, 69(2), 4248.Google Scholar
Sherpa. (2016) Eleventh Sherpa Coaching Survey. Retrieved March 9, 2017, from
Sinewing, C. (2006). Must coaching be couched in secrecy? People Management, 12(14), 4444.Google Scholar
Tang, Y. & Hew, K. F. (May 2017). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Educational Research Review, 21, 85104. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ting, S. & Hart, E. W. (2004). Formal coaching. In McCauley, C. D. & Van Velsor, E. (Eds.), The Center for Creative Leadership handbook of leadership development (pp. 116150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Turvey, C., Coleman, M., Dennison, O., Drude, K., Goldenson, M., Hirsch, P., & Bernard, J. (2013). ATA practice guidelines for video-based online mental health services.Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(9), 722730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, L. (2000). The relationship between distance coaching and the transfer of training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Wilson, M., Hannum, K. & Center for Creative Leadership. (2006). Center for Creative Leadership impact study: Sonoco . Retrieved June 21, 2007. from
Witherspoon, R. & White, R. P. (1996). Executive coaching: What’s in it for you. Training and Development, 50(3), 1415.Google Scholar
Yannick, S., Sutin, A. R., Bovier-Lapierre, G., & Terracciano, A. (2017). Personality and walking speed across adulthood: Prospective evidence from five samples.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 18. doi:10.1177/1948550617725152.CrossRef
Young, D. P. & Dixon, N. M. (1996).Helping leaders take effective action: A program evaluation. Greensboro, NC: CCL Press.Google Scholar
Yuen, E., Goetter, E., Herbert, J., Forman, E., Roberts, M. C., & Carter, J. A. (2012). Challenges and opportunities in internet-mediated telemental health. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(1), 18. Scholar
Zhang, M. (July 1, 2015). Google Photos tags two African-Americans as gorillas through facial recognition software. Forbes. Retrieved from
Aarseth, E., Smedstad, S. M., & Sunnanå, L. (November 2003). A multidimensional typology of games. In Copier, M & Raessens, J. (Eds.), Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Universteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
Aguinis, H. & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvarez, K., Salas, E., & Garofano, C. M. (2004). An integrated model of training evaluation and effectiveness. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 385416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annetta, L., Mangrum, J., Holmes, S., Collazo, K., & Cheng, M. T. (2009). Bridging realty to virtual reality: Investigating gender effect and student engagement on learning through video game play in an elementary school classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 10911113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., Freitas, S., Louchart, S., & De Gloria, A. (2015). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. & Farrell, M. J. (2002). Can virtual reality be used to measure and train surgical skills? Ergonomics, 45(5): 362379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arns, L. L. & Cerney, M. M. (March, 2005). The relationship between age and incidence of cybersickness among immersive environment users. In Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005. IEEE (pp. 267268). Bonn: IEEE.Google Scholar
Arriaga, P., Esteves, F., Carneiro, P., & Monteiro, M. B. (2008). Are the effects of unreal violent video games pronounced when playing with a virtual reality system? Aggressive Behavior, 34(5), 521538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ArthurJr, W., BennettJr, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailenson, J. N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., & Noveck, B. (2006). Courtroom applications of virtual environments, immersive virtual environments, and collaborative virtual environments. Law & Policy, 28(2), 249270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2017). Studying student differentiation in gamified education: A long-term study. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 550585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedwell, W. L., Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2012). Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning: An empirical study. Simulation & Gaming, 43(6), 729760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedwell, W. L. & Salas, E. (2010). Computer‐based training: Capitalizing on lessons learned. International Journal of Training and Development, 14(3), 239249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, G. H., Amaro‐Jiménez, C., & Beckett, K. S. (2010). Students’ use of asynchronous discussions for academic discourse socialization. Distance Education, 31(3), 315335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. W. (2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, B. S., Tannenbaum, S. I., Ford, J. K., Noe, R. A., & Kraiger, K. (2017). 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 305323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bliss, J. P., Tidwell, P. D., & Guest, M. A. (1997). The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigation training to firefighters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(1), 7386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogost, I. (2015). Gamification is bullshit. In Walz, S & Deterding, S. (Eds.), The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications, pp. 65-80. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Booth, V., Masud, T., Connell, L., & Bath-Hextall, F. (2014). The effectiveness of virtual reality interventions in improving balance in adults with impaired balance compared with standard or no treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 28(5), 419431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bos, B. (2009). Technology with cognitive and mathematical fidelity: What it means for the math classroom. Computers in the Schools, 26(2), 107114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, D. A. & McMahan, R. P. (2007). Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer, 40(7), 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, J. O., Goodenough, R. R., Crisler, M. C., Klein, N. D., Alley, R. L., Koon, B. L., … & Wills, R. F. (2010). Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(3), 788796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, K. G. (2005). An examination of the structure and nomological network of trainee reactions: A closer look at “smile sheets.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brydges, R., Hatala, R., Zendejas, B., Erwin, P. J., & Cook, D. A. (2015). Linking simulation-based educational assessments and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 90(2), 246256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burdea, G. C., & Coiffet, P. (2003). Virtual reality technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burleigh, T. J., Schoenherr, J. R., & Lacroix, G. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 759771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. P. (1971). Personnel training and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 22(1), 565602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Rhodenizer, L., Salas, E., & Bowers, C. A. (1998). A framework for understanding pre‐practice conditions and their impact on learning. Personnel Psychology, 51(2), 291320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, T. L., Aglawe, A., Reiners, D., White, S., Borst, C. W., Prachyabrued, M., & Bajpayee, A. (2012). Real-time simulation for a virtual reality-based MIG welding training system. Virtual Reality, 16(1), 4555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Y. J., Chen, S. F., & Huang, J. D. (2011). A Kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 25662570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, E. W. & Hampson, I. (2008). Transfer of training: A review and new insights. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 327341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christou, G. (2014). The interplay between immersion and appeal in video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 92100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuevas, H. M., Fiore, S. M., & Oser, R. L. (2002). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments. Instructional Science, 30(6), 433464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuijpers, P., Donker, T., van Straten, A., Li, J., & Andersson, G. (2010). Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Psychological Medicine, 40(12), 19431957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(2011), 416433.Google Scholar
Denner, J., Ortiz, E., Campe, S., & Werner, L. (2014). Beyond stereotypes of gender and gaming: Video games made by middle school students. In Agius, H. & Angelides, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Digital Games (pp. 667688). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (September 2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 915). ACM.CrossRef
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 7588.Google Scholar
Diemer, J., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H. M., Shiban, Y., & Mühlberger, A. (2015). The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: a review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishaw, M. T. & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J. P., & Rampnoux, O. (2011). Origins of serious games. In Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 2543). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dredge, S. (2014). Facebook closes its $2bn Oculus Rift acquisition. What next? The Guardian. Retrieved from
Duncan, I., Miller, A., & Jiang, S. (2012). A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 949964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elverdam, C. & Aarseth, E. (2007). Game classification and game design: Construction through critical analysis. Games and Culture, 2(1), 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emoto, M., Sugawara, M., & Nojiri, Y. (2008). Viewing angle dependency of visually-induced motion sickness in viewing wide-field images by subjective and autonomic nervous indices. Displays, 29(2), 9099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassbender, E., Richards, D., Bilgin, A., Thompson, W. F., & Heiden, W. (2012). VirSchool: The effect of background music and immersive display systems on memory for facts learned in an educational virtual environment. Computers & Education, 58(1), 490500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, J. Z., Carpenter, J. E., Vaughn, E. D., Dudley, N. M., & Goodman, S. A. (2015). Gamification of human resource processes. In Davis, D. & Gangadharbatla, H. (Eds.), Emerging research and trends in gamification (pp. 108139). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Fox, J., Arena, D., & Bailenson, J. N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(3), 95113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J. & Tang, W. Y. (2014). Sexism in online video games: The role of conformity to masculine norms and social dominance orientation. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 314320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, J., Richards, C. L., Malouin, F., McFadyen, B. J., & Lamontagne, A. (2006). A treadmill and motion coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(2), 157162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerardi, M., Cukor, J., Difede, J., Rizzo, A., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2010). Virtual reality exposure therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder and other anxiety disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 12(4), 298305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillath, O., McCall, C., Shaver, P. R., & Blascovich, J. (2008). What can virtual reality teach us about prosocial tendencies in real and virtual environments? Media Psychology, 11(2), 259282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, E. T. & Sadoski, M. (1995). Commentary: The perils of seduction: Distracting details or incomprehensible abstractions? Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 500511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. (1994). Training dismounted soldiers in a distributed interactive virtual environment. US Army Research Institute Newsletter, 14, 912.Google Scholar
Goodhue, D. L. & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 2, 213236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grantcharov, T. P., Bardram, L., Funch-Jensen, P., & Rosenberg, J. (2003). Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 17(7), 10821085.Google ScholarPubMed
Greco, M., Baldissin, N., & Nonino, F. (2013). An exploratory taxonomy of business games. Simulation & Gaming, 44(5), 645682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinberg, A. M., Careaga, J. S., Mehl, M. R., & O’Connor, M. F. (2014). Social engagement and user immersion in a socially based virtual world. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 479486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, R. & Salas, E. (2011). The transfer of training: What really matters. International Journal of Training and Development, 15(2), 103120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?: A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 30253034).CrossRef
Hanus, M. D. & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. D., Kaiser, S., Ebrahimi, K., Lamberton, G. R., Hadley, H. R., Ruckle, H. C., & Baldwin, D. D. (2007). Prior video game exposure does not enhance robotic surgical performance. Journal of Endourology, 21(10), 12071210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatala, R., Cook, D. A., Zendejas, B., Hamstra, S. J., & Brydges, R. (2014). Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: A meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 19(2), 251272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hays, R. T. & Singer, M. J. (2012). Simulation fidelity in training system design: Bridging the gap between reality and training. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Henriksen, B., Nielsen, R., Szabo, L., Evers, N., Kraus, M., & Geng, B. (2016). A virtual reality system for treatment of phantom limb pain using game training and motion tracking. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 16(1).Google Scholar
Ho, C. C. & MacDorman, K. F. (2010). Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 15081518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochmitz, I. & Yuviler-Gavish, N. (2011). Physical fidelity versus cognitive fidelity training in procedural skills acquisition. Human Factors, 53(5), 489501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 5162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. (2017a). A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Literature Review of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation Programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 317327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. (2017b). Investigating the simulation elements of environment and control: Extending the Uncanny Valley Theory to simulations. Computers & Education, 109, 216232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M. C. (2018). Virtual reality interventions for personal development: A meta-analysis of hardware and software. Human–Computer Interaction, DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2018.1469408.Google Scholar
Howard, M. C. & Jacobs, R. R. (2016). The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): Two novel evaluation methods for developing optimal training programs. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 12461270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irish, J. E. (2013). Can I sit here? A review of the literature supporting the use of single-user virtual environments to help adolescents with autism learn appropriate social communication skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A17A24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., & Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(9), 641661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jense, G. J. & Kuijper, F. (1993). Virtual Environments for Advanced Trainers and Simulators. In Proceedings of the International Training Equipment Conference, (pp. 4957). ITEC.
Juan, M. C. & Pérez, D. (2009). Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety in an acrophobic environment viewed via HMD or CAVE. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(3), 232248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methodsand strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Karl, I., Berg, G., Ruger, F., & Farber, B. (2013). Driving behavior and simulator sickness while driving the vehicle in the loop: Validation of longitudinal driving behavior. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 5(1), 4257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, H., Schmalstieg, D., & Wagner, M. (2000). Construct3D: A virtual reality application for mathematics and geometry education. Education and Information Technologies, 5(4), 263276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keebler, J. R., Jentsch, F., & Hudson, I. (September 2011). Developing an effective combat identification training. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (vol. 55(1), pp. 15541558). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Keebler, J. R., Jentsch, F., & Schuster, D. (2014). The effects of video game experience and active stereoscopy on performance in combat identification tasks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(8), 14821496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keinan, G. (1988). Training for dangerous task performance: The effects of expectations and feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(4), 355373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real”: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3–4), 163174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kickstarter. (2017). Oculus Rift: Step into the Game. Retrieved from
Kilteni, K., Groten, R., & Slater, M. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4), 373387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. Y., Kim, H. J., Kim, E. N., Ko, H. D., & Kim, H. T. (2005). Characteristic changes in the physiological components of cybersickness. Psychophysiology, 42(5), 616625.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975). Techniques for evaluating training programs In Kirkpatrick, D. L. (Ed.). Evaluating training programs. Alexandria, VA: ASTD.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, A., van Mierlo, H., & Arends, L. (2011). The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 12891304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, M. M. & Arns, L. L. (July 2006). The relationship among age and other factors on incidence of cybersickness in immersive environment users. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 research posters (p. 196). ACM.CrossRef
Kober, S. E. & Neuper, C. (2012). Using auditory event-related EEG potentials to assess presence in virtual reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(9), 577587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotnour, T., Landaeta, R., & Lackey, S. (2013). Defining training system impact assessment measures from a stakeholder perspective: Case study of the NEW-IT project. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 5(1), 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozak, J. J., Hancock, P. A., Arthur, E. J., & Chrysler, S. T. (1993). Transfer of training from virtual reality. Ergonomics, 36(7), 777784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M., & Nason, E. R. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(1), 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krupa, A. L., Jagannathan, A., & Reddy, S. K. (2016). Importance of virtual reality job interview training in today’s world. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204(10), 799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, J. H., Chung, C. S., & Lee, J. (2011). The effects of escape from self and interpersonal relationship on the pathological use of internet games. Community Mental Health Journal, 47(1), 113121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lan, Y. F. & Sie, Y. S. (2010). Using RSS to support mobile learning based on media richness theory. Computers & Education, 55(2), 723732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C. (2017). Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 508515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1),2750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, S., Schraw, G., McCrudden, M. T., & Hartley, K. (2007). Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 569587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D., Liau, A., & Khoo, A. (2011). Examining the influence of actual-ideal self-discrepancies, depression, and escapism, on pathological gaming among massively multiplayer online adolescent gamers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 535539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Littrell, L. N., & Salas, E. (2005). A review of cross-cultural training: Best practices, guidelines, and research needs. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 305334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, D., Macchiarella, N. D., & Vincenzi, D. A. (2008). Simulation fidelity. In Vincenzi, D. A., Wise, J. A., Mouloua, M., & Hancock, P. A. (Eds.), Human Factors in Simulation and Training (pp. 6173). New York, NY: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, W. T. & So, R. H. (2001). Cybersickness in the presence of scene rotational movements along different axes. Applied Ergonomics, 32(1), 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. The American Psychologist, 57(9), 705717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohse, K. R., Hilderman, C. G., Cheung, K. L., Tatla, S., & Van der Loos, H. M. (2014). Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PloS One, 9(3), 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, C. E. & Tucker, C. S. (2017). A quantitative method for evaluating the complexity of implementing and performing game features in physically-interactive gamified applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 4258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, M., McNeill, M., Charles, D., McDonough, S., Crosbie, J., Oliver, L., & McGoldrick, C. (2007). Adaptive virtual reality games for rehabilitation of motor disorders. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Ambient Interaction, 681690.CrossRef
MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C. C., & Koch, C. T. (2009). Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 695710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maier, F. H. & Grossler, A. (2000). What are we talking about?: A taxonomy of computer simulations to support learning. System Dynamics Review, 16(2), 135.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makransky, G., Lilleholt, L., & Aaby, A. (2017). Development and validation of the Multimodal Presence Scale for virtual reality environments: A confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 276285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mania, K. & Chalmers, A. (2001). The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: A reality centered approach. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 247264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maran, N. J. & Glavin, R. J. (2003). Low‐to high‐fidelity simulation: A continuum of medical education? Medical Education, 37(1), 2228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maruping, L. M. & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavrikios, D., Karabatsou, V., Fragos, D., & Chryssolouris, G. (2006). A prototype virtual reality-based demonstrator for immersive and interactive simulation of welding processes. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 19(3), 294300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J. D. & Geher, G. (1996). Emotional intelligence and the identification of emotion. Intelligence, 22(2), 89113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrudden, M. T. & Corkill, A. J. (2010). Verbal ability and the processing of scientific text with seductive detail sentences. Reading Psychology, 31(3), 282300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLay, R., Wood, D., Webb-Murphy, J., Spira, J., Wiederhold, M., Pyne, J., & Wiederhold, B. (2011). A randomized, controlled trial of virtual reality-graded exposure therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in active duty service members with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 223229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahan, R. P., Bowman, D. A., Zielinski, D. J., & Brady, R. B. (2012). Evaluating display fidelity and interaction fidelity in a virtual reality game. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(4), 626633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). The role of pre-training interventions in learning: A meta-analysis and integrative review. Human Resource Management Review, 20(4), 261282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messinger, P. R., Stroulia, E., & Lyons, K. (2008). A typology of virtual worlds: Historical overview and future directions. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgram, P. & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 13211329.Google Scholar
Min, B. C., Chung, S. C., Min, Y. K., & Sakamoto, K. (2004). Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator. Applied Ergonomics, 35(6), 549556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirelman, A., Rochester, L., Reelick, M., Nieuwhof, F., Pelosin, E., Abbruzzese, G., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2013). V-TIME: A treadmill training program augmented by virtual reality to decrease fall risk in older adults: Study design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurology, 13(1), 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mon‐Williams, M., Warm, J. P., & Rushton, S. (1993). Binocular vision in a virtual world: Visual deficits following the wearing of a head‐mounted display. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 13(4), 387391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monahan, T., McArdle, G., & Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education, 50(4), 13391353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montegar, C. A., Reid, D. H., Madsen, C. H., & Ewell, M. D. (1977). Increasing institutional staff to resident interactions through in-service training and supervisor approval. Behavior Therapy, 8(4), 533540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. (2015). Historical perspectives on e-learning. In Khan, B. H. & Ally, M. (Eds.), International handbook of e-learning: Theoretical perspectives and research (vol. 1, pp. 4149). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mori, M., MacDorman, K.F., & Kageki, N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, 19(2),98100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morina, N., Ijntema, H., Meyerbröker, K., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2015). Can virtual reality exposure therapy gains be generalized to real-life? A meta-analysis of studies applying behavioral assessments. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 74, 1824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagendran, M., Gurusamy, K. S., Aggarwal, R., Loizidou, M., & Davidson, B. R. (2013). Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (8).CrossRef
Nicholson, S. (2015). A recipe for meaningful gamification. In Reiners, T. & Wood, L. (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 120), New York, NY; Springer.Google Scholar
Nicholson, D. T., Chalk, C., Funnell, W. R. J., & Daniel, S. J. (2006). Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer‐generated three‐dimensional anatomical ear model. Medical Education, 40(11), 10811087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nijman, D. J. J., Nijhof, W. J., Wognum, A. A. M., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2006). Exploring differential effects of supervisor support on transfer of training. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(7), 529549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oculus. (2017). Rift Homepage. Retrieved from
Orvis, K. A., Fisher, S. L., & Wasserman, M. E. (2009). Power to the people: Using learner control to improve trainee reactions and learning in web-based instructional environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palter, V. N. & Grantcharov, T. P. (2014). Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, 259(3), 443448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, Z., Cheok, A. D., Yang, H., Zhu, J., & Shi, J. (2006). Virtual reality and mixed reality for virtual learning environments. Computers & Graphics, 30(1), 2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. & Lim, J. (2007). Promoting positive emotion in multimedia learning using visual illustrations. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), 141.Google Scholar
Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. D. & Rizzo, A. A. (2008). Affective outcomes of virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and specific phobias: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 39(3), 250261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedreira, O., Garcia, F., Brisaboa, N., & Piattini, M. (2015). Gamification in software engineering: A systematic mapping. Information and Software Technology, 57(1),157168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 157170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, M. D. & Barbosa, S. E. (2016). Improving air combat maneuvering skills through self-study and simulation-based practice. Simulation & Gaming, 47(1), 103129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, T. G., Aldridge, A., Bogden, R., & Hanelin, C. (2003). Might virtual reality promote the mood benefits of exercise? Computers in Human Behavior, 19(4), 495509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, T. G., Cage, C., Clements, S., & Stover, A. (2006). Psychological benefits of exercise paired with virtual reality: Outdoor exercise energizes whereas indoor virtual exercise relaxes. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(1), 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plummer, J. P., Schuster, D., & Keebler, J. R. (2017). The effects of gender, flow and video game experience on combat identification training. Ergonomics, 60(8), 11011111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poncin, I. & Garnier, M. (2012). Immersion in a new commercial virtual environment: The role of the avatar in the appropriation process. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 475482.Google Scholar
Porter, N. C., Cote, J. A., Gifford, T. D., & Lam, W. (2006). Virtual reality welder training. Journal of Ship Production, 22(3), 126138.Google Scholar
Psotka, J. (1995). Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training. Instructional Science, 23(5), 405431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, D., Kizony, R., Feintuch, U., Katz, N., Josman, N., & Weiss, P. L. T. (2005). Comparison of two VR platforms for rehabilitation: Video capture versus HMD. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(2), 147160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravyse, W. S., Blignaut, A. S., Leendertz, V., & Woolner, A. (2017). Success factors for serious games to enhance learning: A systematic review. Virtual Reality, 21(1), 3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reason, J. T. & Brand, J. J. (1975). Motion sickness. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Regian, J. W., Shebilske, W. L., & Monk, J. M. (1992). Virtual reality: An instructional medium for visual‐spatial tasks. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 136149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rego, P., Moreira, P. M., & Reis, L. P. (June 2010). Serious games for rehabilitation: A survey and a classification towards a taxonomy. In Proceedings of the 5th Iberian conference on Information systems and technologies (CISTI) (pp. 16). IEEE.
Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual reality: Exploring the brave new technologies of artificial experience and interactive worlds–From cyberspace to teledildonics. Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Riccio, G. E. & Stoffregen, T. A. (1991). An ecological theory of motion sickness and postural instability. Ecological Psychology, 3(3), 195240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, B., Interrante, V., Kaeding, M., & Anderson, L. (October, 2008). The effect of self-embodiment on distance perception in immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology (pp. 167170). ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothbaum, B. O., Hodges, L. F., Ready, D., Graap, K., & Alarcon, R. D. (2001). Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 617622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouiller, J. Z. & Goldstein, I. L. (1993). The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 4(4), 377390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed