Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-08T23:25:39.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Theorizing Sex/Gender: Feminist Social Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

By
Shelley Budgeon
Edited by
Peter Kivisto
Peter Kivisto
Affiliation:
Augustana College, Illinois
Get access

Summary

Feminist theory operates in a ‘dual register’, characterized by the interrogation of mainstream theory, noted for its gender-blindness, and a reflexive auto-critique in which core assumptions of feminist thought are constantly interrogated.Developing the concept of ‘gender’ as a central structuring force in society has been an important theoretical tool. Among the issues addressed in this chapter are the deconstruction of the sex/gender distinction, postcolonial and postmodernist feminist critiques, theories of intersectionality, the emergence of the study of new materialism, and contributions made by transgender theory.

Feminist theory, intersectionality, postcolonial feminism, sex/gender, transgender theory

Shelley Budgeon is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at the University of Birmingham.Her research analyzes how the constitution of gender relations and gender identification are being affected by sociopolitical change.This includes the formation of contemporary femininity and gendered subjectivities, the constitutive relations between different femininities and feminisms in late modernity, and the dynamics of postfeminist neoliberalism.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Social Theory , pp. 98 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, Lisa. 2004. ‘Passing on Feminism: From Consciousness to Reflexivity?’ European Journal of Women’s Studies 11(4): 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, Lisa.2005. ‘Feminist Social Theory.’ In Harrington, Austin (ed.), Modern Social Theory: An Introduction (pp. 233–251). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. 2000. ‘Whose Counting?’ Feminist Theory 1(1): 97–103.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara.2008. ‘Imaginary Prohibitions: Some Preliminary Remarks on the Founding Gestures of the “New Materialisms”.’ European Journal of Women’s Studies 15(1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alaimo, Stacey. 2008. ‘Trans-corporeal Feminisms and the Ethical Space of Nature.’ In Alaimo, Stacey and Hekman, Susan (eds.), Material Feminisms (pp. 237–264). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacey.2010. Bodily Natures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacey, and Hekman, Susan. 2008. Material Feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda. 1995. ‘Cultural Feminism Versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory.’ In Tuana, Nancy and Tong, Rosemary (eds.), Feminism and Philosophy (pp. 434–456). Oxford, UK: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen. 2003. ‘Posthuman Performativity.’ Signs 28(3): 801–831.Google Scholar
Barad, Karen.2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Michele, and Phillips, Anne (eds.). 1992. Destabilizing Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Beasley, Chris. 1999. What Is Feminism? An Introduction to Feminist Thought. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla, and Fraser, Nancy. 1995. Feminist Contentions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Budgeon, Shelley. 2011. Third Wave Feminism and the Politics of Gender in Late Modernity. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith.1998. ‘Merely Cultural.’ New Left Review I (227): 33–44.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith, and Scott, Joan W. (eds.). 1992. Feminists Theorize the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill, and Chepp, Valerie. 2013. ‘Intersectionality.’ In Waylen, Georgina, Celis, Karen, Kantola, Johanna, and Weldon, Laurel S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. www.oxfordhandbooks.com.Google Scholar
Cranny-Francis, Anne, Waring, Wendy, Stavropoulos, Pam, and Kirby, Joan. 2003. Gender Studies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberley. 1989. ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics.’ University of Chicago Legal Forum 14: 538–554.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathy. 2008. ‘Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful.’ Feminist Theory 9(1): 67–85.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone. 1953. The Second Sex. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Dean, Jonathan. 2009. ‘Who’s Afraid of Third Wave Feminism?’ International Feminist Journal of Politics 11(3): 334–352.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1960. ‘The Dualism of Human Nature and Its Social Conditions.’ In Wolff, K. H. (ed.), Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917: A Collection of Essays (pp. 325–340). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile.1964. Suicide. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Elam, Diane. 1994. Feminism and Deconstruction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elam, Diane, and Wiegman, Robyn (ed.). 1995. Feminism Beside Itself. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elliot, Patricia. 2010. Debates in Transgender, Queer and Feminist Theory. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Evans, Mary. 2003. Gender and Social Theory. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. 1995. The Gender of Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1995. ‘From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a “Post-Socialist” Age.’ New Left Review I(212): 68–93.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy.2009. ‘Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History.’ New Left Review 56: 97–117.Google Scholar
Frost, Samantha. 2011. “The Implications of the New Materialisms for Feminist Epistemology.” In Grasswick, Heidi E. (ed.), Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge (pp. 69–84). Dordrecht and New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gatens, Moira. 1996. Imaginary Bodies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geerts, Evelien, and van der Tuin, Iris. 2013. ‘From Intersectionality to Interference: Feminist Onto-epistemological Reflections on the Politics of Representation.’ Women’s Studies International Forum 41: 171–178.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 2005. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Beatrice. 2001. ‘Whatever Happened to Feminist Theory?’ In Bronfen, Elisabeth and Kavka, Misha (eds.), Feminist Consequences (pp. 58–100). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, Austin (ed.). 2005. Modern Social Theory: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hekman, Susan. 2014. The Feminine Subject. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hemmings, Clare. 2005. ‘Telling Feminist Stories.’ Feminist Theory 6(2): 115–139.Google Scholar
Hemmings, Clare. 2011. Why Stories Matter. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Heyes, Cressida. 2003. ‘Feminist Solidarity after Queer Theory: The Case of Transgender.’ Signs 28(4): 1093–1120.Google Scholar
Hines, Sally. 2015. ‘Feminist Theories.’ In Robinson, Victoria and Richardson, Diane (eds.), Introducing Gender & Women’s Studies, 4th ed. (pp. 23–39). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Hinton, Peta. 2014. ‘“Situated Knowledges” and New Materialism(s): Rethinking a Politics of Location.’ Women: A Cultural Review 25(1): 99–113.Google Scholar
Hinton, Peta, and van der Tuin, Iris. 2014. ‘Preface.’ Women: A Cultural Review 25(1): 1–8.Google Scholar
Jackson, Stevi. 1998. ‘Feminist Social Theory.’ In Jackson, Stevi and Jones, Jackie (eds.), Contemporary Feminist Theories (pp. 12–22). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, Sheila. 2014. Gender Hurts. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kavka, Misha. 2001. ‘Introduction.’ In Bronfen, Elisabeth and Kavka, Misha (eds.), Feminist Consequences (pp. ix–xxxi). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Leggett, Will. 2017. Politics and Social Theory: The Inescapably Social and the Irreducibly Political. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Mary. 1995. ‘Beyond the “Big Three”: The Development of Feminist Theory into the 1990s.’ Women’s History Review 4(3): 259–281.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie. 2005. ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality.’ Signs 30(3): 1171–1800.Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. 1995. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Imperial Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 1998. ‘Post-Colonial Feminist Theory.’ in Jackson, Stevi and Jones, Jackie (eds.), Contemporary Feminist Theories (pp. 98–112). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1988. ‘Under Western Eyes, Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.’ Feminist Review 30: 61–88.Google Scholar
Munro, Ealasaid. 2013. ‘Feminism: A Fourth Wave?’ Political Insight 4: 22–25.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda (ed.). 1990. Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda. 1994. ‘Interpreting Gender.’ Signs 20(1): 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Ann. 1985. Sex, Gender and Society, Revised Edition. Aldershot, UK: Gower.Google Scholar
Risman, Barbara. 2004. ‘Gender as a Social Structure.’ Gender & Society 18(4): 429–450.Google Scholar
Sandoval, Chela. 1991. ‘US Third World Feminism: the Theory and Method of Oppositional Consciousness in the Postmodern World.’ Genders, 10: 1–24.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1988. Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy. 1999. Writing the Social, Critique, Theory and Investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ In Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Elizabeth, and Wise, Susan, 2000. ‘But the Empress Has No Clothes!’ Feminist Theory 1(1): 261–288.Google Scholar
Sydie, Rosalind. 1987. Natural Women and Cultured Men. Toronto: Methuen.Google Scholar
Thiele, Kathrin. 2014. ‘Pushing Dualism and Differences: From “Equality versus Difference” to “Nonmimetic Sharing” and “Staying with the Trouble.”’ Women: A Cultural Review 25(1): 9–26.Google Scholar
Trinh, T. Minh-ha. 1989. Woman Native Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
van der Tuin, Iris. 2011. ‘New Feminist Materialisms.’ Women’s Studies International Forum 34: 271–277.Google Scholar
van der Tuin, Iris, and Dolphijn, Rick. 2010. ‘The Transversality of New Materialism.’ Women: A Cultural Review 21(2): 153–171.Google Scholar
Weedon, Chris. 1997. Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Whelehan, Imelda. 1995. Modern Feminist Thought. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn. 1999/2000. ‘Feminism, Institutionalism, and the Idiom of Failure.’ Differences 11(3): 107–136.Google Scholar
Winter, Bronwyn. 2000. ‘Who Counts (or Doesn’t Count) What Is Feminist Theory.’ Feminist Theory 1(1): 105–111.Google Scholar
Witz, Anne. 2001. ‘George Simmel and the Masculinity of Modernity.’ Journal of Classical Sociology 1(3): 353–370.Google Scholar
Witz, Anne, and Marshall, Barbara L.. 2003. ‘The Quality of Manhood: Gender and Embodiment in the Classical Tradition.’ Sociological Review 51(3): 339–56.Google Scholar
Witz, Anne, and Marshall., Barbara L. 2004. ‘Introduction: Feminist Encounters with Sociological Theory.’ In Marshall, Barbara L. and Witz, Anne (eds.), Engendering the Social (pp. 1–15). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Janet. 2000. ‘The Feminine in Modern Art: Benjamin, Simmel and the Gender of Modernity.’ Theory, Culture and Society 17(6): 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×