Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1997a). Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview. Psychological Science, 8(5), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00429.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Simon, L. (1997b). Suppression, accessibility of death-related thoughts, and cultural worldview defense: Exploring the psychodynamics of terror management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 5–18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9216076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, E. (1971). The Birth and Death of Meaning: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Problem of Man, 2nd ed. Free Press.Google Scholar

Becker, E. (1973). The Denial of Death. Free Press.Google Scholar

Edlund, J. E., Cuccolo, K., Irgens, M. S., Wagge, J. R., & Zlokovich, M. S. (2022). Saving science through replication studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620984385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Epstein, S. (1983). The unconscious, the preconscious and the self concept. In Suls, J. & Greenwald, A. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self, (vol. 2, pp. 219–247). Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. (1985). The implications of cognitive-experiential self theory for research in social psychology and personality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 15, 283–310.Google Scholar

Friedman, M. & Rholes, W. S. (2007). Successfully challenging fundamentalist beliefs results in increased death awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 794–801. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.07.00CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, D. T. & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 509–517. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509Google Scholar

Goldenberg, J. L. & Arndt, J. (2008). The implications of death for health: A terror management health model for behavioral health promotion. Psychological Review, 115(4), 1032–1053. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/a0013326CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1982). The self-serving attributional bias: Beyond self-presentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 56–67.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In Baumeister, R. F. (ed.), Public Self and Private Self (pp. 189–212). Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Steinberg, L. (1988). A reaction to Greenwald, Pratkanis, Leippe, and Baumgardner (1986): Under what conditions does research obstruct theory progress? Psychological Review, 95(4), 566–571. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.566CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 308–318. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Chatel, D. (1992a). Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one’s worldview? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 212–220. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.212Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., et al. (1992b). Why do people need self-esteem? Converging evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 913–922. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.913Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Simon, L., & Breus, M. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 627–637.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 29, pp. 61–139). Academic Press. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60016-7Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Arndt, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (2000). Proximal and distal defenses in response to reminders of one’s mortality: Evidence of a temporal sequence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(1), 91–99. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1177/0146167200261009Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Koole, S. L., & Pyszczynski, T. (eds.) (2004). Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review, 93(2), 216–229. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.216Google Scholar

Harmon-Jones, E., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Simon, L. (1996). The effects of mortality salience on intergroup bias between minimal groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 677–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:4<677::AID-EJSP777>3.0.CO;2-23.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harmon-Jones, E., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., et al. (1997). Terror management theory and self-esteem: Evidence that increased self-esteem reduces mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 24–36.Google Scholar

Hayes, J., Schimel, J., Faucher, E. H., & Williams, T. J. (2008). Evidence for the DTA hypothesis II: Threatening self-esteem increases death-thought accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar

Jonas, E., Martens, A., Niesta, D., et al. (2008). Focus theory of normative conduct and terror management theory: The interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1239–1251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kirkpatrick, L. A. & Epstein, S. (1992). Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: Further evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 534–544. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.534Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lewin, K. (1951). Problems of research in social psychology. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers (pp. 155–169). Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Luttrell, A., Petty, R. E., & Xu, M. (2017). Replicating and fixing failed replications: The case of need for cognition and argument quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 178-183.Google Scholar

Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., & Hirschberger, G. (2003). The existential function of close relationships: Introducing death into the science of love. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(1), 20–40. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Noah, T., Schul, Y., & Mayo, R. (2018). When both the original study and its failed replication are correct: Feeling observed eliminates the facial-feedback effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(5), 657–664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pyszczynski, T. & Kesebir, P. (2011). Anxiety buffer disruption theory: A terror management account of posttraumatic stress disorder. Anxiety, Stress & Coping: An International Journal, 24(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.517524Google Scholar

Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106(4), 835–845. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835Google Scholar

Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Thirty years of terror management theory: From genesis to revelation. In Olson, J. & Zanna, M. (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 52, pp. 1–70), Elsevier.Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory I: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 681–690. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.681Google Scholar

Routledge, C., Arndt, J., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2004). A time to tan: Proximal and distal effects of mortality salience on sun exposure intentions. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 30(10), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264056CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schilpp, P. A. (1979). Albert Einstein: Autobiographical Notes. Open Court.Google Scholar

Schimel, J., Hayes, J., Williams, T., & Jahrig, J. (2007). Is death really the worm at the core? Converging evidence that worldview threat increases death-thought accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 789–803. https://doi-org.lib-proxy01.skidmore.edu/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.789Google Scholar

Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Harmon-Jones, E., (1997). Terror management and cognitive-experiential self-theory: Evidence that terror management occurs in the experiential system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1132–1146. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15982118Google Scholar

Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991a). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 91–159). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991b). Terror management theory of self-esteem. In Snyder, C. R. & Forsyth, D. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health Perspective (pp. 21–40). Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Wegner, D. M (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34Google Scholar

Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, et al. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

American Psychological Association (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Available at: www.apa.org/ethics/code/.Google Scholar

Awrey, J., Inaba, K., Barmparas, G., et al. (2011). Reference accuracy in the general surgery literature. World Journal of Surgery, 35(3), 475–479.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 36, 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bem, D. J. (1995). Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 118(2), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.172Google Scholar

Bem, D. J. (1987). Writing the empirical journal article. In Zanna, M. P. & Darley, J. M. (eds.), The Compleat Academic (pp. 171–201). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Boice, R. & Jones, F. (1984). Why academicians don’t write. Journal of Higher Education, 55(5), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bornmann, L. & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiGoogle Scholar

Bossuyt, P., Reitsma, J., & Bruns, D. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138, 40–44.Google Scholar

Cano, A. F. (2021). Letter to the Editor : publish, publish … cursed ! Scientometrics, 126(4), 3673–3682.Google Scholar

Carlson, R. V., Boyd, K. M., & Webb, D. J. (2004). The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: Past, present and future. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 57(6), 695–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, S., Fama, J., Clancy, K., Ebert, J., & Tierney, A. (2012). Writing for Psychology: A Guide for Psychology Concentrators. Harvard University.Google Scholar

Chamberlin, T. C. (1897). Studies for students: The method of multiple working hypotheses. Journal of Geology, 5(8), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.3109/13590849208997976Google Scholar

Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the social sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344.Google Scholar

Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2011). Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 176–180.Google Scholar

Dwan, K., Altman, D. G., Arnaiz, J. A., et al. (2008). Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e3081.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dworkin, J. D., Linn, K. A., Teich, E. G., et al. (2020). The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists. Nature Neuroscience, 23(8), 918–926.Google Scholar

Etter, J. & Stapleton, J. (2009). Citations to trials of nicotine replacement therapy were biased toward positive results and high-impact-factor journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 831–837.Google Scholar

Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556Google Scholar

Fiore, N. A. (2007). The Now Habit: A Strategic Program for Overcoming Procrastination and Enjoying Guilt-Free Play. Penguin.Google Scholar

Fisher, B. S., Cobane, C. T., Vander Ven, T. M., & Cullen, F. T. (1998). How many authors does it take to publish an article? Trends and patterns in political science. PS – Political Science and Politics, 31(4), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500053452CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, D. W. & Fogg, L. (1992). But the reviewers are making different criticisms of my paper! Diversity and uniqueness in reviewer comments. In Kazdin, A. E. (ed.), Methodological Issues & Strategies in Clinical Research (pp. 723–738). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. D. (1993). Statement of editorial policy: 1993. American Psychologist, 48, 5–7.Google Scholar

Fox, M. F. (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2011). Changing incentives to publish. Science, 333(6043), 702–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gastel, B. (2016). How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. Greenwood.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grant, L. & Ward, K. B. (1991). Gender and publishing in sociology. Gender & Society, 5(2), 207–223.Google Scholar

Greene, A. E. (2013). Writing Science in Plain English. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371Google Scholar

Hollenbeck, J. R. & Wright, P. M. (2017). HARKing, SHARKing, and THARKing: Making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. Journal of Management, 43(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316679487CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hommel, B. (2020). Pseudo-mechanistic explanations in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(4), 1294–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hudson, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(3), 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ilie, A. & Ispas, D. (2007). Excellence through diversity: Interview with a prolific researcher. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 3(3).Google Scholar

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2018). Defining the role of authors and contributors. Available at: www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.Google Scholar

Ioannidis, J. P. A. & Klavans, R. (2018). The scientists who publish a paper every five days. Nature, 561, 167–169.Google Scholar

Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, 5, 212. Available at: www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf.Google Scholar

Jung, H. & Albarracin, D. (2021). Concerns for others increases the likelihood of vaccination against influenza and COVID-19 more in sparsely rather than densely populated areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(1), e2007538118.Google Scholar

Kazak, A. E. (2018). Editorial: Journal article reporting standards. American Psychologist, 73(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000263Google Scholar

Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4Google Scholar

Klesky, K. (2015). The Professor Is In: The Essential Guide to Turning Your Ph.D. into a Job. Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar

Klingner, J. K., Scanlon, D., & Pressley, M. (2005). How to publish in scholarly journals. Educational Researcher, 34(8), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034008014Google Scholar

Lapidow, A. & Scudder, P. (2019). Shared first authorship. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(4), 618–620.Google Scholar

Lee, A. & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187–200.Google Scholar

Leimu, R. & Koricheva, J. (2005). What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(1), 28–32.Google Scholar

Li, Y. (2019). Mentoring junior scientists for research publication. In Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication (pp. 233–250). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Linton, J. D., Tierney, R., & Walsh, S. T. (2011). Publish or perish: How are research and reputation related? Serials Review, 37(4), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2011.09.001Google Scholar

Liu, S. & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). Research methods in sport and exercise psychology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.224Google Scholar

Luck, S. J. (2014). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, 2nd ed. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4736938Google Scholar

Masic, I. (2011). How to search, write, prepare and publish the scientific papers in the biomedical journals. Acta Informatica Medica, 19(2), 68–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McDougall, W. (2015). An Introduction to Social Psychology. Psychology Press.Google Scholar

McEnernehy, L. (2013). The problem of the problem. In The University of Chicago Writing Program (pp. 1–30). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McEnernehy, L. (2021). Leadership lab: The craft of writing effectively. Available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtIzMaLkCaM&t=3085s.Google Scholar

McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500453053CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGuire, W. J. (1997). Creative hypothesis generating in psychology: Some useful heuristics. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 1–30.Google Scholar

Milkman, K. (2021). How to Change: The Science of Getting from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be. Penguin.Google Scholar

Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G., & Bedeian, A. G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(5), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751Google Scholar

Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of report of parallel-group randomised trials. JAMA, 285, 1987–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.09.006Google Scholar

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Grp, P. (2010). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. International Journal of Surgery, 8(5), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097Google Scholar

Mudrak, B. (2021). What is a megajournal? Available at: www.aje.com/arc/what-is-a-megajournal.Google Scholar

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V., et al. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Murtaugh, P. A. (2002). Journal quality, effect size, and publication bias in meta‐analysis. Ecology, 83(4), 1162–1166.Google Scholar

Neill, U. S. (2008). Publish or perish, but at what cost? Journal of Clinical Investigation, 118(7), 2368.Google Scholar

Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s publish fewer papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, A. A. & Siow, A. (2003). Does federal research funding increase university research output? Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Phaf, R. H. (2020). Publish less, read more. Theory and Psychology, 30(2), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319898250Google Scholar

Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference. Science, 146(3642), 347–353.Google Scholar

Polka, J. K., Kiley, R., Konforti, B., Stern, B., & Vale, R. D. (2018). Publish peer reviews. Nature, 560(7720), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06032-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Qiu, J. (2010). Publish or perish in China. Nature, 463(7278), 142. https://doi.org/10.1038/463142aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rawat, S. & Meena, S. (2014). Publish or perish: Where are we heading? Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 19(2), 87–89.Google Scholar

Reich, E. S. (2009). The rise and fall of a physics fraudster. Physics World, 22(5), 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riviera, E. (2013). Scientific communities as autopoietic systems: The reproductive function of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1442–1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rozin, P. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward?: A different perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 435–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01151.xGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701.Google Scholar

Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schweitzer, J. C. (1988). Research article productivity by mass communication scholars. Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 479–484.Google Scholar

Segran, E. (2015). Why a fake article titled “Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?” was accepted by 17 medical journals. Available at: www.fastcompany.com/3041493/why-a-fake-article-cuckoo-for-cocoa-puffs-was-accepted-by-17-medical-journals.Google Scholar

Sharman, A. (2015). Where to publish. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 97(5), 329–332. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2015.0003Google Scholar

Shockley, W. (1957). On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories. Proceedings of the IRE, 45(3), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1957.278364Google Scholar

Smith, H. M. & Banks, P. B. (2017). How dangerous conservation ideas can develop through citation errors. Australian Zoologist, 38(3), 408–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Writing for your referees. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals (pp. 161–168). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strunk, W. (2007). The Elements of Style. Penguin.Google Scholar

Tramer, M. R. (2013). The Fujii story: A chronicle of naive disbelief. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 30(5), 195–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Dalen, H. P. & Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asiGoogle Scholar

VandenBos, G. R. (2017). From print to digital (1985–2015): APA’s evolving role in psychological publishing. American Psychologist, 72(8), 837–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000229Google Scholar

Vetter, P., Vu, D. L., L’Huillier, A. G., et al. (2020). Clinical features of COVID-19. BMJ, 369, m1470.Google Scholar

von Elm, E., Altman, D., Egger, M., et al. (2007). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet, 370, 1453–1457.Google Scholar

Wang, X., Dworkin, J., Zhou, D., et al. (2020). Gendered citation practices in the field of communication. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ywrcqGoogle Scholar

Warren, M. G. (2000). Reading reviews, suffering rejection. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Guide to Publishing in Psychology Journals (pp. 169–186). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weinberg, S. (2003). Four golden lessons. Nature, 426(6965), 389. https://doi.org/10.1038/426389aGoogle Scholar

Weiner, I. B. (2003). Handbook of Psychology, History of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96(2), 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox052Google Scholar

Wicherts, J. M. & Bakker, M. (2012). Publish (your data) or (let the data) perish! Why not publish your data too? Intelligence, 40(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.004Google Scholar

World Medical Association (2008). Declaration of Helsinki. Available at: www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/doh-oct2008.Google Scholar

Adler, A. (2010). Talking the talk: Tips on giving a successful conference presentation. Available at: www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2010/04/presentation.Google Scholar

Aguilar, S. (2018). Tips for a successful job talk. Available at: https://stephenaguilar.com/tips-successful-job-talk/.Google Scholar

Alperin, J. P., Nieves, C. M., Schimanski, L. A., et al. (2019). Meta-research: How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? ELife, 8, e42254.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association (n.d.) APA 2021 Presenter Hub.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association (n.d.). Quite possibly the world’s worst PowerPoint presentation ever. Available at: www.apa.org/gradpsych/2012/01/worst-powerpoint-ever.pdf.Google Scholar

Association for Information Science and Technology (n.d.). ASIS&T Annual Meeting. Available at: www.asist.org/meetings-events/am.Google Scholar

Bauer, K. W. & Bennett, J. S. (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate. Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berchin, I. I., Sima, M., de Lima, M. A., et al. (2018). The importance of international conferences on sustainable development as higher education institutions’ strategies to promote sustainability: A case study in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 756–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boysen, G. A., Jones, C., Kaltwasser, R., & Thompson, E. (2018). Keys to a successful job talk: Perceptions of psychology faculty. Teaching of Psychology, 45(3), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0098628318779277Google Scholar

Buddie, A. M. & Collins, C. L. (2011). Faculty perceptions of undergraduate research. PURM: Perspectives on Mentoring Undergraduate Researchers, 1(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Caprio, M. & Hackey, R. (2014). If you built it, they will come: Strategies for developing an undergraduate research conference. The Journal of Health Administration Education, 31(3), 247. Available at: www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/if-you-built-they-will-come-strategies-developing/docview/1694861709/se-2?accountid=26228.Google Scholar

Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2016). Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self-efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21341Google Scholar

Career Professionals of Canada (2013). The benefits of attending professional conferences. Available at: https://careerprocanada.ca/benefits-attending-professional-conferences/.Google Scholar

Carsrud, A. L., Palladino, J. J., Tanke, et al. (1984). Undergraduate psychology research conferences: Goals, policies, and procedures. Teaching of Psychology, 11(3), 141–145.Google Scholar

Catalini, C., Fons-Rosen, C., & Gaulé, P. (2020). How do travel costs shape collaboration? Management Science, 66(8), 3340–3360. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3381Google Scholar

Chambers, R. (2014). Presenting your research effectively. Available at: www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2014/02/presenting.Google Scholar

Conyers, V. (2003). Posters: An assessment strategy to foster learning in nursing education. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-20030101-09.Google Scholar

Crooks, D. & Kilpatrick, M., (1998). In the eye of the beholder: Making the most of poster presentations – Part 2. Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal 8 (3), 154–159. https://europepmc.org/article/med/9814152Google Scholar

Davis, S. F. & Smith, R. A. (1992). Regional conferences for teachers and students of psychology. In Puente, A. E., Matthews, J. R., & Brewer, C. L. (eds.), Teaching Psychology in America: A History (pp. 311–328). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10120-013Google Scholar

Durvasula, R. S. & Regan, P. C. (2006). Style and substance: Twelve tips for a better job talk. Available at: www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/style-and- substance-twelve-tips-for-a-better-job-talk.Google Scholar

de Leon, F. L. L. & McQuillin, B. (2020). The role of conferences on the pathway to academic impact evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 55(1), 164–193. http://jhr.uwpress.org/content/55/1/164.shortGoogle Scholar

Everson, K. M. (n.d.). The scientist’s guide to poster design. Available at: www.kmeverson.org/academic-poster-design.html.Google Scholar

Fulford, R. & Standing, C. (2014). Construction industry productivity and the potential for collaborative practice. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.007Google Scholar

Gundogan, B., Koshy, K., Kurar, L., & Whitehurst, K. (2016). How to make an academic poster. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 11, 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.09.001Google Scholar

Gillies, D. A. & Pettengill, M. (1993). Retention of continuing education participants. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19930101-06Google Scholar

Greenfield Boyce, N. (2019). To save the science poster, researchers want to kill it and start over. Available at: www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/06/11/729314248/to-save-the-science-poster-researchers-want-to-kill-it-and-start-over.Google Scholar

Gumbhir, V. K. (2014). From students to scholars: Undergraduate research and the importance of regional conferences. The American Sociologist, 45(2), 298–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-014-9212-2Google Scholar

Gunnels, C. W. (2019). Undergraduate research develops transferable skills more successfully than other high impact practices. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/researchsymposium/2019/12thAnnual/3/.Google Scholar

Halligan, P. (2008). Poster presentations: Valuing all forms of evidence. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.02.005Google Scholar

Hanchanale, S., Kerr, M., Ashwood, P., et al. (2018). Conference presentation in palliative medicine: Predictors of subsequent publication. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 8(1), 73–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001425Google Scholar

Helm, H. W. & Bailey, K. G. (2013). Perceived benefits of presenting undergraduate research at a professional conference. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(3). https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/behavioral-pubs/63/Google Scholar

Hess, G., Tosney, K., & Liegel, L. (2013). Creating effective poster presentations. Available at: https://projects.ncsu.edu/project/posters/.Google Scholar

Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173Google Scholar

Ilic, D. & Rowe, N. (2013). What is the evidence that poster presentations are effective in promoting knowledge transfer? A state of the art review. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 30(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12015Google Scholar

Ishiyama, J. (2002). Does early participation in undergraduate research benefit social science and humanities students? College Student Journal, 36(3), 381–387.Google Scholar

Kent, C., Allen, P. J., Harding, S., & Fielding, J. L. (2019). The Psychology Undergraduate Research Conference: A pathway to publishing?. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00491Google Scholar

Kneale, P., Edwards-Jones, A., Walkington, H., & Hill, J. (2016). Evaluating undergraduate research conferences as vehicles for novice researcher development. International Journal for Researcher Development, 7(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-10-2015-0026Google Scholar

Kuhn, J. (2010). 14 Tips for better presentation slides. Available at: www.viget.com/articles/14-tips-for-better-presentation-slides/Google Scholar

Lei, S. A. & Chuang, N. K. (2009). Undergraduate research assistantship: A comparison of benefits and costs from faculty and student perspectives. Education, 130, 232–240.Google Scholar

Lien, A., Fyne, A., DeVito, J., et al. (2019). Promoting undergraduate student engagement in the SCRA Biennial Conference. Global Journal of Community Psychology Practice, 10(2). Available at: www.gjcpp.org/en/article.php?issue=32&article=195.Google Scholar

Lund, N. (2013). Ten years of using presentations at a student conference as a final assessment. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 12(2), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.2304%2Fplat.2013.12.2.185Google Scholar

Mascarelli, A. (2014). Research tools: Jump off the page. Nature, 507(7493), 523–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7493-523aGoogle Scholar

Marek, P., Christopher, A. N., & Koenig, C. S. (2002). Applying technology to facilitate poster presentations. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 70–72. https://doi.org/10.1207%2FS15328023TOP2901_12Google Scholar

Mata, H., Latham, T. P., & Ransome, Y. (2010). Benefits of professional organization membership and participation in national conferences: Considerations for students and new professionals. Health Promotion Practice, 11(4), 450–453. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1524839910370427Google Scholar

Miller, L., Weaver, A., Johnson, C. (2007). Giving a good scientific presentation. Available at: www.asp.org/education/EffectivePresentations.pdfGoogle Scholar

Monash University (n.d.). A guide to oral presentations. Available at: –www.monash.edu/rlo/quick-study-guides/a-guide-to-oral-presentationsGoogle Scholar

Morrison-Beedy, D., Aronowitz, T., Dyne, J., & Mkandawire, L. (2001). Mentoring students and junior faculty in faculty research: A win–win scenario. Journal of Professional Nursing, 17(6), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpnu.2001.28184Google Scholar

Potter, S. J., Abrams, E., Townson, L., & Williams, J. E. (2009). Mentoring undergraduate researchers: Faculty mentors’ perceptions of the challenges and benefits of the research relationship. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 6(6). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v6i6.1131Google Scholar

Price, M. (2011). The perfect poster: Experts reveal the art behind displaying your science. Available at: www.apa.org/gradpsych/2011/01/poster.Google Scholar

Quan, G. M. & Elby, A. (2016). Connecting self-efficacy and views about the nature of science in undergraduate research experiences. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12 , 020140 . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020140Google Scholar

Rocky Mountain Psychological Association (n.d.). Tips for presenters. Available at: www.rockymountainpsych.com/tips-for-presenters.Google Scholar

Rowh, M. (2012). Power up your PowerPoint: Seven research-backed tips for effective presentations. Available at: www.apa.org/gradpsych/2012/01/presentationsGoogle Scholar

Rittichainuwat, B. N., Beck, J. A., & Lalopa, J. (2001). Understanding motivations, inhibitors, and facilitators of association members in attending international conferences. Journal of Convention & Exhibition Management, 3(3), 45–62.Google Scholar

Schimanski, L. A. & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research, 7, 1605. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1Google Scholar

Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10131Google Scholar

Shilling, R. D. and Ballard, D. (2020). Rethinking the science poster. Available at: https://convention.apa.org/blog/rethinking-the-science-poster.Google Scholar

Smith, S. E. & Rankin, C. (2002). Conferences: Why to Attend and How to Benefit. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Sura, S. A., Smith, L. L., Ambrose, M. R., et al. (2019). Ten simple rules for giving an effective academic job talk. PLoS Computational Biology. 15(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007163Google Scholar

Thomas, M., Inniss-Richter, Z., Mata, H., & Cottrell, R. R. (2013). Career development through local chapter involvement: Perspectives from chapter members. Health Promotion Practice, 14(4), 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1524839913479378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tien, F. F. (2007). Faculty research behaviour and career incentives: The case of Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2006.04.014Google Scholar

Utah State University (n.d.). Poster traveling tips: How far can you go? Available at: https://engineering.usu.edu/students/open-access-computer-labs/poster-traveling-tips.Google Scholar

Wipke-Tevis, D. D., & Williams, D. A. (2002). Preparing and presenting a research poster. Journal of Vascular Nursing, 20(4), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1067/mvn.2002.130001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Woolsey, J. D. (1989). Combating poster fatigue: how to use visual grammar and analysis to effect better visual communications. Trends in Neurosciences, 12(9), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(89)90039-8Google Scholar

Al-Zaiti, S. & Carey, M. (2015). The prevalence of clinical and electrocardiographic risk factors of cardiovascular death among on-duty professional firefighters. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 30(5).Google ScholarPubMed

Atkins, P. W. B. & Wood, R. E. (2002). Self- versus others’ ratings as predictors of assessment center ratings: Validation evidence for 360-degree feedback programs. Personnel Psychology, 55(4), 871–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00133.xGoogle Scholar

Bennett, L. M. & Gadlin, H. (2012). Collaboration and team science: From theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 60(5), 768–775. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871dGoogle Scholar

Billilign, S. (2013). The Need for Interdisciplinary Research and Education for Sustainable Human Development to Deal with Global Challenges. North Carolina A&T State University.Google Scholar

Breckler, S. (2005). The importance of disciplines. Available at: www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2005/10/ed-column.Google Scholar

Breland, A., Balster, R. L., Cobb, C., et al. (2019). Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model. American Psychologist, 74(3), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000426Google Scholar

Bridges, D. R., Davidson, R. A., Odegard, P. S., Maki, I. V., & Tomkowiak, J. (2011). Interprofessional collaboration: Three best practice models of interprofessional education. Medical Education Online, 16. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035Google Scholar

Carey, M., Al-Zaiti, S., Liao, L., Butler, R., & Martin, H. (2010). Characteristics of the standard 12-lead holter ECG in professional firefighters. Computing in Cardiology, 37, 685−688.Google Scholar

Carey, M., Baldzizhar, A., Miterko, C., et al. (2018). A quiet firehouse: Reducing environmental stimuli among professional on-duty firefighters. Journal of Environmental Medicine 60(2), 186–190.Google Scholar

Carey, M. G., Regehr, C., Wagner, S. L., et al. (2021). The prevalence of PTSD, major depression and anxiety symptoms among high-risk public transportation workers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 94, 867–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01631-5Google Scholar

Carey, M. G., Trout, D. R., & Qualls, B. W. (2019). Hospital-based research internship for nurses: The value of academic librarians as cofaculty. J Nurses Prof Dev, 35(6), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnd.0000000000000585Google Scholar

Choi, B. C. & Pak, A. W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine. Medecine Clinique et Experimentale, 29(6), 351–364.Google ScholarPubMed

Collyer, T. A. (2018). Three metaphors to aid interdisciplinary dialogue in public health. American Journal of Public Health, 108(11), 1483–1486. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, J. (1995). Interdisciplinary courses and team teaching: New arrangements for learning Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(3), 348–350.Google Scholar

Dick, D. M. (2017). Rethinking the way we do research: The benefits of community-engaged, citizen science approaches and nontraditional collaborators. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 41(11), 1849–1856. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13492Google Scholar

Foster, E. D. & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open Science Framework (OSF) [Product Review]. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203–206.Google Scholar

Garcia-Dia, M. J. (2021). Nursing informatics: An evolving specialty. Nursing Management, 52(5), 56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000743444.08164.b4Google Scholar

Gavens, L., Holmes, J., Bühringer, G., McLeod, J., et al. (2018). Interdisciplinary working in public health research: A proposed good practice checklist. Journal of Public Health (Oxf), 40(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx027Google Scholar

Gebbie, K. M., Meier, B. M., Bakken, S., et al. (2008). Training for interdisciplinary health research: Defining the required competencies. Journal of Allied Health, 37(2), 65–70.Google Scholar

Gill, S. V., Vessali, M., Pratt, J. A., et al. (2015). The importance of interdisciplinary research training and community dissemination. Clinical and Translational Science, 8(5), 611–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12330Google Scholar

Goldsberry, J. W. (2018). Advanced practice nurses leading the way: Interprofessional collaboration. Nurse Education Today, 65, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.024Google Scholar

Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., et al. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap): A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010Google Scholar

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2022). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (accessed September 2022).Google Scholar

Jull, J., Giles, A., & Graham, I. D. (2017). Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: Advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implementation Science, 12(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Khoury, M. J., Lam, T. K., Ioannidis, J. P., et al. (2013). Transforming epidemiology for 21st century medicine and public health. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 22(4), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-13-0146Google Scholar

Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Wayne State University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-97814-000Google Scholar

Levine, G. N., Cohen, B. E., Commodore-Mensah, Y., et al. (2021). Psychological health, well-being, and the mind–heart–body connection: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. 143, e763–e783. https://doi.org/doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000947Google Scholar

Lindner, M. D., Torralba, K. D., & Khan, N. A. (2018). Scientific productivity: An exploratory study of metrics and incentives. PloS One, 13(4), e0195321–e0195321. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195321Google Scholar

Moradian, N., Ochs, H. D., Sedikies, C., et al. (2020). The urgent need for integrated science to fight COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Journal of Translational Medicine, 18(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02364-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morley, L. & Cashell, A. (2017). Collaboration in health care. The Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 48(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2017.02.071CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/11153Google Scholar

National Research Council (2014). Convergence: Facilitating Transdisciplinary Integration of Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Engineering, and Beyond. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.17226/18722Google Scholar

Newell, W. & Klein, J. (1996). Interdiscplinary studies into the 21st century Journal of General Education, 45(2), 152–169.Google Scholar

Nyström, M. E., Karltun, J., Keller, C., & Andersson Gäre, B. (2018). Collaborative and partnership research for improvement of health and social services: Researcher’s experiences from 20 projects. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0Google Scholar

Peek, L. & Guikema, S. (2021). Interdisciplinary theory, methods, and approaches for hazards and disaster research: An introduction to the special issue. Risk Analysis, 41(7), 1047–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13777Google Scholar

Perkel, J. M. (2020). Streamline your writing – and collaborations – with these reference managers. Nature, 585(7823), 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02491-2Google Scholar

Pescosolido, B. A., Perry, B. L., Long, J. S., et al. (2008). Under the influence of genetics: How transdisciplinarity leads us to rethink social pathways to illness. AJS: American Journal of Sociology, 114, S171–201. https://doi.org/10.1086/592209Google Scholar

Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6(6), CD000072. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3Google Scholar

Rennie, D., Yank, V., & Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA, 278(7), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.278.7.579Google Scholar

Repko, A. (2008). Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Sarani, B., Shiroff, A., Pieracci, F. M., et al. (2021). Use of the Internet to facilitate an annual scientific meeting: A Report of the first Virtual Chest Wall Injury Society summit. Journal of Surgical Education, 78(3), 889–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.09.004Google Scholar

Smith, E. & Master, Z. (2017). Best practice to order authors in multi/interdisciplinary health sciences research publications. Accountability in Research, 24(4), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567Google Scholar

Stokols, D., Hall, K., Taylor, B. K., & Moser, R. P. (2008). The science of team science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S78–S89.Google Scholar

Szostak, R. (2002). How to do interdisciplinarity: Integrating the debate. Issues in Integrative Studies, 20, 103–122.Google Scholar

Total Communication (2019). Transdisciplinary approach: What does it mean? Available at: www.totalcommunication.com.sg/post/transdisciplinary-approach-what-does-it-mean (accessed February 16, 2021).Google Scholar

Urbanska, K., Huet, S., & Guimond, S. (2019). Does increased interdisciplinary contact among hard and social scientists help or hinder interdisciplinary research? PloS One, 14(9), e0221907.Google Scholar

VanNoorden, C. (2014). Interdisciplinary research by the numbers. In Cronin, B. & Sugimoto, C. (eds.), Beyond Bibliometrics (p. 480). MIT Press.Google Scholar

Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2017). Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 69–79.Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983). Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluators. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 146–156.Google Scholar

Bischof, N. (1975). A systems‘ approach towards the functional connections of attachment and fear. Child Development, 46, 801–817.Google Scholar

Brunswik, E (1952) The conceptual framework of psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 49(6), 654–656Google Scholar

Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duhem, P. (1954). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Translated by P. P. Wiener). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Earp, B. D. & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 621.Google Scholar

Edlund, J. E., Cuccolo, K., Irgens, M. S., Wagge, J. R., & Zlokovich, M. S. (2022). Saving science through replication studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 216–225.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K. (2017). What constitutes strong psychological science? The (neglected) role of diagnosticity and a priori theorizing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 46–61.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K., McCaughey, L., & Prager, J. (2021). Quo vadis, methodology? The key role of manipulation checks for validity control and quality of science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 816–826.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G. & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175.Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.Google Scholar

Marsh, H. W. & Ball, S. (1989). The peer review process used to evaluate manuscripts submitted to academic journals: Interjudgmental reliability. The Journal of Experimental Education, 57(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38(4), 379–387.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1980). Two dogmas of empiricism. In Quine, W. V. O. (ed.), From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed. (pp. 20–46). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. (1984). Applying Hamlet‘s question to the ethical conduct of research: A conceptual addendum. American Psychologist, 39, 561–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sturgeon, T. (1957). On hand … offhand: Books. Venture Science Fiction, 1, 49.Google Scholar

Swets, J. A., Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000). Psychological science can improve diagnostic decisions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Unkelbach, C., Koch, A., & Alves, H. (2019). The evaluative information ecology: On the frequency and diversity of “good” and “bad”. European Review of Social Psychology, 30, 216–270.Google Scholar

Unkelbach, C., Alves, H., & Koch, A. (2020). Negativity bias, positivity bias, and valence asymmetries: Explaining the differential processing of positive and negative information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 115–187.Google Scholar

Wagenmakers, E. J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., et al. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yaniv, I., Choshen-Hillel, S., & Milyavsky, M. (2009). Spurious consensus and opinion revision: Why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 558–563.Google Scholar

Albertine, K. (2010). Advice for submitting manuscripts to scientific journals. Experimental Biology, 24(S1). https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.24.1_supplement.8.1Google Scholar

Altman, Y. & Baruch, Y. (2008). Strategies for revising and resubmitting papers to refereed journals. British Journal of Management, 19, 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00542.xGoogle Scholar

Andersen, M. Z., Fonnes, S., & Rosenberg, J. (2021). Time from submission to publication varied widely for biomedical journals: A systematic review. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 37(6), 985–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2021.1905622Google Scholar

APA (2020a). Summary report of journal operations, 2019. American Psychologist, 75(5), 723–724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000680Google Scholar

APA (2020b). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th ed. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., et al. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force report. American Psychologist, 73, 3–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191Google Scholar

Cooper, H. (2018). Reporting Quantitative Research in Psychology: How to Meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards, 2nd ed. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000103-000Google Scholar

Degele, L. (2010). New illustrated guide for authors submitting to ScholarOne Manuscripts™ (formerly Manuscript Central). Editors’ Bulletin, 6(2), 40–42. https://doi.org/17521742.2010.516195Google Scholar

DeMaria, A. (2011). Manuscript revision. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 57(25). 2540–2541.Google Scholar

Forsyth, A. (2021). Peer review in a generalist journal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 87(4), 451–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1958551Google Scholar

Garand, J. & Harman, M. (2021). Journal desk-rejection practices in political science: Bringing data to bear on what journals do. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(4) 676–681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096521000573Google Scholar

Hall, D. (n.d.). J K Rowling turned down by 12 publishers before finding success with Harry Potter books. Available at: https://riseupeight.org/jk-rowling-harry-potter-books/.Google Scholar

Harlow, L. L. (2017). The making of Psychological Methods. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000141Google Scholar

Holmbeck, G. N. & Devine, K. A. (2009). Editorial: An author’s checklist for measure development and validation manuscripts. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(7), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp046CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnson, C. & Green, B. (2009). Submitting manuscripts to biomedical journals: Common errors and helpful solutions. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 32(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.12.002Google Scholar

Judge, W. (2008). The screening process for new submissions. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(6), i–iv.Google Scholar

Kennedy, M. S. (2018). Journal publishing: A review of the basics. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 34(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2018.09.004Google Scholar

Kusumoto, F. M., Bittl, J. A., Creager, M. A., et al. (2021). High-quality peer review of clinical and translational research. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 78(15), 1564–1568.Google Scholar

Lake, E. T. (2020). Why and how to avoid a desk rejection. Research in Nursing & Health, 43, 141–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22016Google Scholar

LaPlaca, P., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2018a). How to write really good articles for premier academic journals. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.11.014Google Scholar

LaPlaca, P., Lindgreen, A., Vanhamme, J., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2018b). How to revise, and revise really well, for premier academic journals. Industrial Marketing Management, 72, 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.030Google Scholar

Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., et al. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151Google Scholar

Lovejoy, T. I., Revenson, T. A., & France, C. R. (2011). Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9269-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mendiola Pastrana, I. R., Hernández, A. V., Pérez Manjarrez, F. E., et al. (2020). Peer-review and rejection causes in submitting original medical manuscripts. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 40(3), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000295CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pierson, D. J. (2004). The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. Respiratory Care, 49 (10), 1246–1252.Google Scholar

Pierson, C. A. (2016). The four R’s of revising and resubmitting a manuscript. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 28(8), 408–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12399Google Scholar

Price, B. (2014). Improving your journal article using feedback from peer review. Nursing Standard, 29(4), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.184651910.7748/ns.29.4.43.e9101Google Scholar

Raitskaya, L. & Tikhonova, E. (2020). Seven deadly sins: Culture’s effect on scholarly editing and publishing. Journal of Language and Education, 6 (3), 167–172. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.11205Google Scholar

Rigby, J., Cox, D., & Julian, K. (2018). Journal peer review: A bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation. Scientometrics, 114, 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2630-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smith, R. (2020). Learning from Leonardo – The importance of the rough draft. Available at: https://blog.shrm.org/blog/learning-from-leonardo-the-importance-of-the-rough-draft.Google Scholar

Steer, P. J. & Ernst, S. (2021). Peer review: Why, when and how. International Journal of Cardiology Congenital Heart Disease, 2, 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcchd.2021.100083Google Scholar

Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE): A proposal for reporting. JAMA, 283(15), 2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008.Google Scholar

Su’a, B., MacFater, W. S., & Hill, A. G. (2017). How to write a paper: Revising your manuscript. ANZ Journal of Surgery; 87(3), 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13847.Google Scholar

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Al-Khatib, A., Katavić, V., & Bornemann-Cimenti, H. (2018). Establishing sensible and practical guidelines for desk rejections. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1347–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9921-3Google Scholar

Tikhonova, E. & Raitskaya, L. (2021). Improving submissions to scholarly journals via peer review. Journal of Language and Education, 7(2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.12686Google Scholar

Williams, H. C. (2004). How to reply to referees’ comments when submitting manuscripts for publication. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 51(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.049Google Scholar

Belmont Forum (2020). Transdisciplinary research for pathways to sustainability. Available at: www.belmontforum.org/cras#pathways2020.Google Scholar

NIH (2022). Review criteria at a glance. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/guidelines_general/Review_Criteria_at_a_glance.pdf.Google Scholar

NSF PAPPG (2022). NSF 22–1 proposal and award policies and procedures guide, October 4, 2021. Available at: www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappGoogle Scholar

Stephens, D. W. (2013). Writing an Effective NSF Pre-proposal. ISBN 13: 978–1493547067. Middletown, DE.Google Scholar

Adam, H. & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 918–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.008Google Scholar

Allen, P. J. & Baughman, F. D. (2016). Active learning in research methods classes is associated with higher knowledge and confidence, though not evaluations or satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, March 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brownell, S. E., Hekmat-Scafe, D. S., Singla, V., et al. (2015). A high-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience improves student conceptions of scientific thinking and ability to interpret data. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 14(2), ar21. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-05-0092CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burkley, E. & Burkley, M. (2009). Mythbusters: A tool for teaching research methods in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739586Google Scholar

Burns, D. M., Fox, E. L., Greenstein, M., Olbright, G., & Montgomery, D. (2019). An old task in new clothes: A preregistered direct replication attempt of enclothed cognition effects on Stroop performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 83, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.10.001Google Scholar

Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: A consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659Google Scholar

Chen, J., Hui, L. S., Yu, T., et al. (2021). Foregone opportunities and choosing not to act: Replications of inaction inertia effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619900570CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corts, D. P. & Tatum, H. E. (2019). Ethics in Psychological Research: A Practical Guide for the Student Scientist. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Cuccolo, K. (2019). Engaging in cross-cultural research with Psi Chi’s Network for International Collaborative Exchange (NICE). Eye on Psi Chi, 23(4), 46–47. https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-9812.Eye23.4.46Google Scholar

Cuccolo, K., Irgens, M. S., Zlokovich, M. S., Grahe, J., & Edlund, J. E. (2021). What crowdsourcing can offer to cross-cultural psychological science. Cross-Cultural Research, 55(1), 3-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, C. (2016). Activities for Teaching Research Methods. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

DeBruine, L. (2020). faux: Simulation for factorial designs (0.0.1.2) [Computer software]. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2669586Google Scholar

Flake, J. K. & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393Google Scholar

Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., et al. (2017). A collaborative approach to infant research: Promoting reproducibility, best practices, and theory-building. Infancy: The Official Journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, 22(4), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182Google Scholar

Frank, M. C. & Saxe, R. (2012). Teaching replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 600–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460686Google Scholar

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1319030111Google Scholar

Friedrich, J., Buday, E., & Kerr, D. (2000). Statistical training in psychology: A national survey and commentary on undergraduate programs. Teaching of Psychology, 27(4), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP2704_02Google Scholar

Grahe, J. E. (2017). Authentic research projects benefit students, their instructors, and science. In Obeid, R., Schwartz, A., Shane-Simpson, C., & Brooks, P. J. (eds.), How We Teach Now: The GSTA Guide to Student-Centered Teaching (pp. 351–367). Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Available at: http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/howweteachnow.Google Scholar

Grahe, J. E., Reifman, A., Hermann, A. D., et al. (2012). Harnessing the undiscovered resource of student research projects. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 605–607. http://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459057Google Scholar

Gurung, R. A. R. & Stoa, R. (2020). A national survey of teaching and learning research methods: Important concepts and faculty and student perspectives. Teaching of Psychology, 47(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320901374Google Scholar

Hawkins, R. X. D., Smith, E. N., Au, C., et al. (2018). Improving the replicability of psychological science through pedagogy. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917740427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heene, M. & Ferguson, C. J. (2017). Psychological science’s aversion to the null, and why many of the things you think are true, aren’t. In Lilienfeld, S. O. & Waldman, I. D (eds.), Psychological Science under Scrutiny: Recent Challenges and Proposed Solutions (pp. 34–52). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzahan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–135.Google Scholar

Jekel, M., Fiedler, S., Allstadt Torras, R., et al. (2020). How to teach open science principles in the undergraduate curriculum: The Hagen Cumulative Science Project. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719868149Google Scholar

Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178Google Scholar

Kuh, G. D. 2008. High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar

LaCosse, J., Ainsworth, S. E., Shepherd, M. A., et al. (2017). An active-learning approach to fostering understanding of research methods in large classes. Teaching of Psychology, 44(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317692614CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landrum, R. E. & Clark, J. (2005). Graduate admissions criteria in psychology: An update. Psychological Reports, 97(2), 481–484. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.97.2.481-484Google Scholar

Langkjӕr-Bain, R. (2019). The troubling legacy of Francis Galton. Significance, 16(3), 16–21.Google Scholar

Long, O. & Chalk, H. M. (2020). Belonging and marital perception variances in emerging adults with differing disability identities. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 25(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.24839/2325-7342.JN25.1.22Google Scholar

Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & Spence, J. C. (2000). Effects of within-class grouping on student achievement: An exploratory model. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598748CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., et al. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058Google Scholar

O’Neill, G. & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centred learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In Neill, B. O, Moore, S., & McMullin, B. (eds.), Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching (pp. 27–36). All Ireland Society for Higher Education.Google Scholar

Olson-McBride, L., Hassemer, H., & Hoepner, J. (2016). Broadening participation: Engaging academically at-risk freshmen in undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 37(1), 4–10.Google Scholar

Open Science Collaboration (2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462588Google Scholar

Perlman, B. & McCann, L. I. (2005). Undergraduate research experiences in psychology: A national study of courses and curricula. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3201_2Google Scholar

Quintana, D. S. (2021). Replication studies for undergraduate theses to improve science and education. Nature Human Behaviour, 5, 1117–1118. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01192-8Google Scholar

Rajecki, D. W., Appleby, D., Williams, C. C., Johnson, K., & Jeschke, M. P. (2005). Statistics can wait: Career plans activity and course preferences of American psychology undergraduates. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 4(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2004.4.2.83Google Scholar

Reifman, A. & Grahe, J. E. (2016). Introduction to the special issue of emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815588022Google Scholar

Richmond, A. S. & Hagan, L. K. (2011). promoting higher level thinking in psychology: Is active learning the answer? Teaching of Psychology, 38(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311401581Google Scholar

Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108Google Scholar

Sizemore, O. J. & Lewandowski, G. W. (2011). Lesson learned: Using clinical examples for teaching research methods. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 10(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2011.10.1.25Google Scholar

Skulborstad, H. M. & Hermann, A. D. (2016). Individual difference predictors of the experience of emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815579820Google Scholar

Society for the Teaching of Psychology (n.d.) Project syllabus description. Available at: http://teachpsych.org/otrp/syllabi/index.php.Google Scholar

Stowell, J. R. & Addison, W. E. (eds.). (2017). Activities for Teaching Statistics and Research Methods: A Guide for Psychology Instructors. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000024-000Google Scholar

Sutherland, C. L., Hildebrandt, L., Wagge, J. R., et al. (2021). Troy, Ford, McRae, Zarolia, & Mauss (2017). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9SR2KGoogle Scholar

Wagge, J. R., Brandt, M. J., Lazarevic, L. B., et al. (2019). Publishing research with undergraduate students via replication work: The Collaborative Replications and Education Project. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00247Google Scholar

Wagge, J. R., Hurst, M. A., Brandt, M. J., Lazarevic, L. B., Legate, N., & Grahe, J. E. (2022). Teaching research in principle and in practice: What do psychology instructors think of research projects in their Courses? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221101942Google Scholar

Yoder, J. D., Mills, A. S., & Raffa, E. R. (2016). An effective intervention in research methods that reduces psychology majors’ sexist prejudices. Teaching of Psychology, 43, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316649314CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aguinis, H. & Pierce, C. A. (2008). Enhancing the relevance of organizational behavior by embracing performance management research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.493CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, N. (2007). The practitioner–researcher divide revisited: Strategic-level bridges and the roles of IWO psychologists. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317907X187237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, J. L., Cucina, J. M., Walmsley, P. T., & Martin, N. R. (2015). General factor in employee surveys: A large-sample investigation. Poster presented at the 30th meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Philadelphia, PA, 23–25 April.Google Scholar

Cascio, W. F. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … bridge application and scholarship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.528Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155Google Scholar

Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi Experimentation: Design and Analytical Issues for Field Settings. Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Cucina, J. M. & Byle, K. A. (2014). Technical Note: The Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) Measures a Large General Factor (and a Few Smaller Ones). US Customs and Border Protection.Google Scholar

Cucina, J. M., Credé, M., Curtin, P. J., Walmsley, P. T., & Martin, N. R. (2014a). Large sample evidence of a general factor in employee surveys. Poster presented at the 29th meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Honolulu, HI, May 15–17.Google Scholar

Cucina, J. M., Hayes, T. L., Walmsley, P. T., & Martin, N. R. (2014b). It is time to get medieval on the overproduction of pseudotheory: How Bacon (1267) and Alhazen (1021) can save I/O psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(3), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12163Google Scholar

Equality and Human Rights Commission (2014). What equality law means for you as an employer: When you recruit someone to work for you. Equality Act 2010 Guidance for Employers. (Vol. 1). Available at: www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/what_equality_law_means_for_you_as_an_employer_-_recruitment.pdf.Google Scholar

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146Google Scholar

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149Google Scholar

Feintzeig, R. (2020). The vanishing executive assistant. Wall Street Journal, January 18. Available at: www.wsj.com/articles/the-vanishing-executive-assistant-11579323605.Google Scholar

Gelade, G. A. (2006). But what does it mean in practice? The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology from a practitioner perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X85638Google Scholar

Harmon, L. W., Hansen, J. C., Borgen, F. H., & Hammer, A. L. (1994). Strong Interest Inventory: Applications and Technical Guide. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.Google Scholar

Hodgkinson, G. P. (2006). The role of JOOP (and other scientific journals) in bridging the practitioner–researcher divide in industrial, work, and organizational (IWO) psychology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X104013Google Scholar

Johnson, J. G. (1976). Albermarle Paper Company v. Moody: The aftermath of Griggs and the death of employee testing. Hastings Law Journal, 27(6), 1239–1262.Google Scholar

Mintern, T. & Rayner, S. (2018). 8 Aspects of GDPR compliance: A brief guide for HR functions. Available at: www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=fac839cf-e292-4452-b1d6-f87c81e81424.Google Scholar

Rynes, S. L. (2007). Let’s create a tipping point: What academics and practitioners can do, alone and together. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.27156169Google Scholar

Rynes, S. L. (2012). The research–practice gap in I/O psychology and related fields: Challenges and potential solutions. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. (ed.), Oxford Library of Psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 1 (pp. 409–452). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 340–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069460Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (2003). History, development, evolution, and impact of validity generalization and meta-analysis methods, 1975–2002. In Murphy, K. R. (ed.), Validity Generalization: A Critical Review (pp. 31–66). Erlbaum,.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Ury, V. W. (1976). Statistical power in criterion-related validation studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(4), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.4.473Google Scholar

Tippins, N. T., Oswald, F. L., & McPhail, S. M. (2021). Scientific, legal, and ethical concerns about AI-based personnel selection tools: A call to action. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 7(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.25035/pad.2021.02.001Google Scholar

Training Industry (2020). Income & Employment Report. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.Google Scholar

US Department of Labor (2000). Testing and Assessment: An Employer’s Guide to Good Practices. Employment and Training Administration, US Department of Labor. Available at: www.onetcenter.org/dl_files/empTestAsse.pdf.Google Scholar