Part III - Data Collection

Axelson, O., Fredriksson, M., & Ekberg, K. (1994). Use of the prevalence ratio v the prevalence odds ratio as a measure of risk in cross sectional studies. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51(8), 574. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.51.8.574Google Scholar

Barros, A. J. & Hirakata, V. N. (2003). Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-21Google Scholar

Brumback, B. & Berg, A. (2008). On effect-measure modification: Relationships among changes in the relative risk, odds ratio, and risk difference. Statistics in Medicine, 27(18), 3453–3465. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, D. & Fiske, D. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105.Google Scholar

Colditz, G. A. (2010). Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 50 Suppl 1, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.526838Google Scholar

Freemantle, N., Marston, L., Walters, K., et al. (2013). Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research. BMJ, 347, f6409. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6409Google Scholar

Garger, J. (2020). A definition of single source bias in social science research. Available at: www.johngarger.com/blog/a-definition-of-single-source-bias-in-social-science-research.Google Scholar

Hennekens, C. H. & Buring, J. E. (1987). Epidemiology in Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Hughes, K. (1995). Odds ratios in cross-sectional studies. International Journal of Epidemiology, 24(2), 463–464, 468. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/24.2.463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hulley, S, B., Cummings, S. R. Browner, W. S., et al. (2001). Designing Clinical Research, 2nd ed. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Jewell, N. (2004). Statistics for Epidemiology. Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

Kleinbaum, D., Kupper, L., & Morgenstern, H. (1982). Epidemiologic Research. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Lee, J. (1994). Odds ratio or relative risk for cross-sectional data? International Journal of Epidemiology, 23(1), 201–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/23.1.201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Martinez, B. A. F., Leotti, V. B., Silva, G. S. E., et al. (2017). Odds ratio or prevalence ratio? An overview of reported statistical methods and appropriateness of interpretations in cross-sectional studies with dichotomous outcomes in veterinary medicine. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 4, 193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00193Google Scholar

Mellis, C. M. (2020). How to choose your study design. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 56(7), 1018–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14929Google Scholar

Mitchell, T. (1985). An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 192–205.Google Scholar

Moore, D., & McCabe, G. (2002). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics, 4th ed. WH Freeman and Company.Google Scholar

Mukaka, M. M. (2012). Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69–71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23638278Google Scholar

Pandis, N. (2014a). Cross-sectional studies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 146(1), 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.05.005Google Scholar

Pandis, N. (2014b). Introduction to observational studies: part 2. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 145(2), 268–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.11.002Google Scholar

Pearce, N. (2004). Effect measures in prevalence studies. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(10), 1047–1050. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6927Google Scholar

Polychronopoulou, A., & Pandis, N. (2014). Interpretation of observational studies. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 146(6), 815–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.004Google Scholar

Reichenheim, M. E. & Coutinho, E. S. (2010). Measures and models for causal inference in cross-sectional studies: arguments for the appropriateness of the prevalence odds ratio and related logistic regression. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-66Google Scholar

Rothman, K. J. Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Santos, C. A., Fiaccone, R. L., Oliveira, N. F., et al. (2008). Estimating adjusted prevalence ratio in clustered cross-sectional epidemiological data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-80Google Scholar

Sedgwick, P. (2014). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. BMJ, 349, g7327. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7327Google Scholar

Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410Google Scholar

Sedgewick, P. (2018). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, (correction). BMJ, 362, k4131. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4131Google Scholar

Stromberg, U. (1994). Prevalence odds ratio v prevalence ratio. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51(2), 143–144. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.51.2.143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tamhane, A. R., Westfall, A. O., Burkholder, G. A., & Cutter, G. R. (2017). Prevalence odds ratio versus prevalence ratio: choice comes with consequences. Statistics in Medicine, 36(23), 3760. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7375Google Scholar

Thiese, M. S. (2014). Observational and interventional study design types; an overview. Biochemia Medica, 24(2), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.022Google Scholar

Thompson, M. L., Myers, J. E., & Kriebel, D. (1998). Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done? Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(4), 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.55.4.272Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29.Google Scholar

Traissac, P., Martin-Prevel, Y., Delpeuch, F., & Maire, B. (1999). Regression logistique vs autres modeles lineaires generalises pour l’estimation de rapports de prevalences.[Logistic regression vs other generalized linear models to estimate prevalence rate ratios.] La Revue d’épidémiologie et de santé publique 47(6), 593–604. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10673593Google Scholar

Twisk, J. W. R.(2013). Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis for Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zocchetti, C., Consonni, D., & Bertazzi, P. A. (1995). Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data. International Journal of Epidemiology, 24(5), 1064–1067. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/24.5.1064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alexander, L., Lopes, B., Ricchetti-Masterson, K., & Yeatts, K. (2014–15). Cross-sectional Studies. UNC CH Department of Epidemiology. Available at: https://sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2015/07/nciph_ERIC8.pdf.Google Scholar

Favero, N. & Bullock, J. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308.Google Scholar

George, B. & Pandey, S. K. (2017). We know the yin – but where is the yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17698189Google Scholar

Gullon, P., Bilal, U., & Franco, M. (2014). Physical activity environment measurement and same source bias. Gaceta Sanitaria, 28(4), 344–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.12.011Google Scholar

Lee, J. & Chia, K. S. (1994). Use of the prevalence ratio v the prevalence odds ratio as a measure of risk in cross sectional studies. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 51(12), 841. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.51.12.841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, J., Tan, C. S., & Chia, K. S. (2009). A practical guide for multivariate analysis of dichotomous outcomes. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 38(8), 714–719. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19736577Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Romo, G., Garrido-Munoz, M., Lucia, A., Mayorga, J. I., & Ruiz, J. R. (2013). Asociacion entre las caracteristicas del entorno de residencia y la actividad fisica.[Association between the characteristics of the neighborhood environment and physical activity.] Gaceta Sanitaria, 27(6), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.01.006Google Scholar

Swinscow, T. (1997). Study design and choosing a statistical test. BMJ Publishing Group. Available at: www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/statistics-square-one/13-study-design-and-choosing-statisti.Google Scholar

Szklo, M. & Javier Nieto, F. (2004). Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics. Jones and Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar

Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., Schwalm, D. E., Carroll, J. L., & Hsiung, S. (1998). Comparison of a randomized and two quasi-experimental designs in a single outcome evaluation: Efficacy of a university-level remedial writing program. Evaluation Review, 22(2), 207–244.Google Scholar

Angrist, J. D. & Pischke, J-S. (2015). Mastering ‘Metrics: The Path from Cause to Effect. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Arum, R. & Roksa, J. (2010). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berk, R., Barnes, G., Ahlman, L., & Kurtz, E. (2010). When second best is good enough: A comparison between a true experiment and a regression discontinuity quasi-experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(2), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloom, H. S. (2003). Using “short” interrupted time-series analysis to measure the impacts of whole-school reforms: With application to a study of accelerated schools. Evaluation Review, 27(1), 3–49.Google Scholar

Braden, J. P. & Bryant, T. J. (1990). Regression discontinuity designs: Applications for school psychologists. School Psychology Review, 19(2), 232–239.Google Scholar

Cook, T. D. (2008). “Waiting for life to arrive”: A history of the regression–discontinuity designs in psychology, statistics and economics. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 636–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Wong, V. C. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 724–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, T. D., Steiner, P. M., & Pohl, S. (2009). Assessing how bias reduction is influenced by covariate choice, unreliability and data analysis mode: An analysis of different kinds of within-study comparisons in different substantive domains. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(6), 828–847.Google Scholar

Eckert, W. A. (2000). Situational enhancement of design validity: The case of training evaluation at the World Bank Institute. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(2) 185–193.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 16(5), 319–324.Google Scholar

Goldberger, A. S. (2008). Selection bias in evaluation treatment effects: Some formal illustrations. In Fomby, T., Hill, R. C., Millimet, D. L., Smith, J. A., & Vytlacil, E. J. (eds.), Modeling and Evaluating Treatment Effects in Economics (pp. 1–31). JAI Press.Google Scholar

Goplan, M., Rosinger, K., & Ahn, J. B. (2020). Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: Growth, promise, and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 218–243.Google Scholar

Heinsman, D. T. & Shadish, W. R. (1996). Assignment methods in experimentation: When do nonrandomized experiments approximate answers from randomized experiments? Psychological Methods, 1(2), 154–169.Google Scholar

Henry, G. T., Fortner, C. K., & Thompson, C. L. (2010). Targeted funding for educationally disadvantaged students: A regression discontinuity estimate of the impact on high school student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 183–204.Google Scholar

Henry, G. T. & Harbatkin, E. (2020). The next generation of state reforms to improve their lowest performing schools: An evaluation of North Carolina’s school transformation intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(4), 702–730.Google Scholar

Hudson, J., Fielding, S., & Ramsay, C.R. (2019). Methodology and reporting characteristics of studies using interrupted time series design in healthcare. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Imbens, G. W. & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice, Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635.Google Scholar

Jacob, R., Zhu, P., Somers, M-A., & Bloom, H. (2012). A Practical Guide to Regression Discontinuity. Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar

Kazden, A. E. (2011). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, D. S. & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281–355.Google Scholar

Lehman, D. R., Lempert, R. O., & Nisbett, R. E. (1988). The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events. American Psychologist, 43(6), 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsey, M.W., Cordray, D.S., & Berger, D.E. (1981). Evaluation of a juvenile diversion program: Using multiple lines of evidence. Evaluation Review, 5(3), 283–306.Google Scholar

Mark, M. M. & Mellor, S. (1991). The effect of self-relevance of an event on hindsight bias: The foreseeability of a layoff. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, M. S., Peters, S. J., & Housand, A. M. (2012). Regression discontinuity design in gifted and talented education research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(2), 105–112.Google Scholar

McCleary, R. & McDowall, D. (2012). Time-series designs. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., et al. (eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Volume 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological (pp. 613–627). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

McCrary, J. (2008). Manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design: A density test. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 698–714.Google Scholar

Nugent, W. R. (2010). Analyzing Single System Design Data. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Palmgreen, P. (2009) Interrupted time-series designs for evaluating health communication campaigns. Communication Methods and Measures, 3(1–2), 29–46.Google Scholar

Paluck, E. L. & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339–367.Google Scholar

Reichardt, C. S. (2019). Quasi-Experimentation: A Guide to Design and Analysis. Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Reynolds, K. D. & West, S. G. (1987). A multiplist strategy for strengthening nonequivalent control group designs. Evaluation Review, 11(6), 691–714.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100(469), 322–331.Google Scholar

Sagarin, B. J., West, S. G., Ratnikov, A., Homan, W. K., & Ritchie, T. D. (2014). Treatment noncompliance in randomized experiments: Statistical approaches and design issues. Psychological Methods, 19(3), 317–333.Google Scholar

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar

Somers, M.-A., Zhu, P., Jacob, R., & Bloom, H. (2013). The Validity and Precision of the Comparative Interrupted Time Series Design and the Difference-in-Difference Design in Educational Evaluation. Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.Google Scholar

St. Pierre, R. G., Ricciuti, A., & Creps, C. (1999). Synthesis of Local and State Even Start Evaluations. Abt Associates.Google Scholar

Thistlewaite, D. L. & Campbell, D. T. (1960). Regression–discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex-post-facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(2), 309–317.Google Scholar

Trochim, W. M. K. (1984). Research Designs for Program Evaluation: The Regression–Discontinuity Approach. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Barber, T. X. (1973). Pitfalls in research: Nine investigator and experimenter effects. In Travers, R. (ed.). Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Cook, D. L. (1967). The Impact of the Hawthorne Effect in Experimental Design in Educational Research, Cooperative Research Project, 1967, No. 1757. US Office of Education.Google Scholar

Gephart, W. J. & Antonoplos, D. P. (1969). The effects of expectancy and other research-biasing factors. The Phi Delta Kappan, 50(10) 579–583. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20372478.Google Scholar

Lee, J. (2021). Situation, background, assessment, and recommendation stepwise education program: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 100, 104847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104847Google Scholar

Noh, G. O. & Kim, M. (2021). Effectiveness of assertiveness training, SBAR, and combined SBAR and assertiveness training for nursing students undergoing clinical training: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 103, 104958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104958Google Scholar

Osman, K. & Lee, T. (2014). Impact of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agents on students’ understanding and motivation in the Learning of electrochemistry. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 12(2), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9407Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. (1963). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: The experimenter’s hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results. American Science, 51, 268–283.Google Scholar

Whitley, E. & Ball, J. (2002). Statistics review 4: Sample size calculations. Critical Care, 6(4), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1521CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yu, F.-Y. & Chen, C.-Y. (2021). Student- versus teacher-generated explanations for answers to online multiple-choice questions: What are the differences? Computers & Education, 173, 104273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104273Google Scholar

Asher, H. B. (1983). Casual Modelling. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Barnett, V. & Lewis, T. (1994). Outliers in Statistical Data, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. C. & White, D. A. (1991). How John Henry effects confound the measurement of self-esteem in primary prevention programs for drug abuse in middle schools. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 36(3), 87–102.Google Scholar

Bell, J. (1993). Doing Your Own Research Project. Open University Press.Google Scholar

Benjamin, L. (1988). A History of Psychology. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bonate, P. (2000). Analysis of Pretest–Posttest Designs. Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bordens, K. & Abbott, B. (2007). Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. McGrath Hill.Google Scholar

Braaten, L. J. (1989). The effects of person-centred group therapy. Person Centred Review, 4(2), 18.Google Scholar

Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2003). SPSS for Psychologists. A Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows, 2nd ed. Palgrave.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Chiva-Bartoll, O., Montero, P. J. R, Capella-Peris, C., & Salvador-García, C. (2020). Effects of service learning on physical education teacher education students’ subjective happiness, prosocial behavior, and professional learning. Frontiers in Psychology. 11, 331.Google Scholar

Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualising Data. Hobart Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal social psychological research. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared statistics in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 107–112.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Crotty, M. (2006). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspectives in the Research Process, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Dawes, M., Davies, P., Gray, A., et al. (2005). Evidence Based Practice: A Primer for Health Care Professionals, 2nd ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar

Denny, M., Denieffe, S. & Pajnkihar, M. (2017). Using a Non-equivalent Control Group Design in Educational Research. Research Methods Cases Part 2. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Dickinson, K. P., Johnson, T. R., &. West, R. W. (1987). An analysis of the sensitivity of quasi experimental net impact estimates of CETA programmes. Evaluation Review, 11, 452–472.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. A. (1971). The Design of Experiments, 8th ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frank, M. G. & Gilovich, T. (1988). The dark side of self- and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.74Google Scholar

Goodwin, J. C. (1995). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Gravetter, F. J. & Wallnau, L. B. (2000). Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar

Hains, A. A. & Szyjakowski, M. (1990). A cognitive stress-reduction intervention program for adolescents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(1), 80.Google Scholar

Heppner, P. P. (1999). Extending the tradition of the counseling psychologist by building on strengths. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000099271005Google Scholar

Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M., & Wampold, B. E. (1992). Research Design in Counseling. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M., & Wampold, B. E (2004). Research Design in Counseling, 2nd ed. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Hershberger, S. L. (2005). History of multivariate analysis of variance. In Everitt, B. & Howell, D. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science (vol. 2, pp. 864–869). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Hopkins, W. G. (2016). A new view of statistics. Available at: www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/.Google Scholar

Hoinville, J. & Jowell, R. (1978). Survey Research Practice. Heinemann.Google Scholar

Houle, T. T., Penzien, D. B., & Houle, C. K. (2005). Statistical power and sample size estimation for headache research: An overview and power calculation tools. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 45(5), 414–418.Google Scholar

Huck, S. W. & Cormier, W. H. (1996). Principles of research design. In Jennison, C. (ed.), Reading Statistics and Research (pp. 578–622). 2nd ed. Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Huck, S. W., Cormier, W. H., & Bounds, W. F. (1974). Reading Statistics and Research. Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Hunsley, J. & Lee, C.M. (2006). Introduction to Clinical Psychology. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Kazdin, E. & Bass, D. (1989). Power to detect differences between alternative treatments in comparative psychotherapy outcomes research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioural Research. Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar

Kim, Y. & Steiner, P. M. (2019). Gain scores revisited: A graphical models perspective. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119826155Google Scholar

Kirk, R. E. (2005). Handbook of Research in Experimental Psychology. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Kush, K. & Cochran, L. (1993). Enhancing a sense of agency through career planning. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40(4), 434–439.Google Scholar

Lee, S. & Lee, E. (2020). Effects of cognitive behavioral group program for mental health promotion of university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3500.Google Scholar

Lipsey, M. W. & Wilson, D.B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational and behavioural treatment: Conformation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.Google Scholar

Loftin, L. & Madison, S. (1991). The extreme dangers of covariance corrections. In Thompson, B. (ed.), Advances in Educational Research: Substantive Findings, Methodological Developments. JAI Press.Google Scholar

Miles, J. (2003). A framework for power analysis using a structural equation modelling procedure. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3, 27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McMillan, J. H. (2000). Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer. Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar

Murray, T. R. (2003). Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Theses and Dissertations. Corwin Press Inc.Google Scholar

Noh, G. O. & Kim, D. H. (2019). Effectiveness of a self-directed learning program using blended coaching among nursing students in clinical practice: A quasi-experimental research design. BMC Med Education, 19(1), 225.Google Scholar

Parsons, H. M. (1974). What happened at Hawthorn? Science, 183, 93.Google Scholar

Patton, P. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Pallant, J. (2006). SPSS Survival Manual, 2nd ed. McGrath Hill.Google Scholar

Pastor, D. A. & Kaliski, P. K. (2007). Examining college students’ gains in general education. Research and Practice in Assessment, 1(2), 1–20.Google Scholar

Polit, D. F. (2005). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilization, 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods, 7th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Hungler, B. P. (2006). Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisals, and Utilization, 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers, 2nd ed. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils’ Intellectual Development. Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (2008). Essentials of Behavioural Research: Method and Data Analysis, 3rd ed. McGrath Hill.Google Scholar

Rosnow, R. L. & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes and counter nulls on other people’s published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods, 1, 331–340.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. (1979) Using multivariate matched sampling and regression adjustment to control bias in observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 318–328.Google Scholar

Riley, M. W. (1967). Sociological Research; A Case Approach. Harcourt Brace and JovanovichGoogle Scholar

Saks, M. & Allsop, J. (2007). Health Research Sampling Methods. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Serlin, R. C. & Lapsley, D. K. (1985). Rationality in psychological research: The good- enough principle. American Psychologist, 40, 73–83.Google Scholar

Sokal, R. R. & Rohif, F. J. (1981). Biometry: The principles and practices of Statistics in Biological Research. W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar

Stevens, J. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, 4th ed. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed. Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Thistlethwaite, D. & Campbell, D. (1960). Regression–discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51 309–317.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25–29.Google Scholar

White, H. & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-experimental Design and Methods, Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 8. UNICEF.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, D. W. & Williams, R. H. (1982). Gain scores in research can be highly reliable. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19(2), 149–154.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. A., Lindsay, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 3–9.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. A., Berkowitz, L., & Donnerstein, E. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2003.pspi_1433.xGoogle Scholar

Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., et al. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 151–173.Google Scholar

Banaji, M. R. & Crowder, R. G. (1989). The bankruptcy of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 44, 1185–1193.Google Scholar

Bender, J., Rothmund, T., & Gollwitzer, M. (2013). Biased estimation of violent video game effects on aggression: Contributing factors and boundary conditions. Societies, 3, 383–398. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc3040383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berkowitz, L. & Donnerstein, E. (1982). External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. American Psychologist, 37(3), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.3.245Google Scholar

Bernstein, M. H. & Wood, M. D. (2017). Effect of anticipatory stress on placebo alcohol consumption in a bar laboratory. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 43(1), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, K. R., Brooks, R., Arthur, L. C., & Denson, T. F. (2020). In the context of romantic attraction, beautification can increase assertiveness in women. PloS One, 15(3), e0229162.Google Scholar

Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 155–195.Google Scholar

Carnagey, N. L. & Anderson, C. A. (2007). Changes in attitudes towards war and violence after September 11, 2001, Aggressive Behavior, 33, 118–129.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Denson, T. F., Creswell, J. D., Terides, M. D., & Blundell, K. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal increases neuroendocrine reactivity to acute social stress and physical pain. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 49, 69–78.Google Scholar

Edlund, J. E., Cuccolo, K., Irgens, M. S., Wagge, J. R., & Zlokovich, M. S. (2022). Saving science through replication studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 216–225.Google Scholar

Gable, P. A., Poole, B. D., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2015). Anger perceptually and conceptually narrows cognitive scope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 163–174.Google Scholar

Gentile, D. A., Bender, P. K., & Anderson, C. A. (2017). Violent video game effects on salivary cortisol, arousal, and aggressive thoughts in children. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 39–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.045Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., King, G., Pettigrew, S. & Wilson, T. D. (2016). Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.” Science, 351(6277), 1037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7243.Google Scholar

Greitemeyer, T. & Mügge, D. O. (2014). Video games do affect social outcomes: A meta-analytic review of the effects of violent and prosocial video game play. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(5), 578–589.Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29.Google Scholar

Kalokerinos, E. K., Greenaway, K. H., & Denson, T. F. (2015). Reappraisal but not suppression downregulates the experience of positive and negative emotion. Emotion, 15(3), 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krahé, B. & Busching, R. (2015). Breaking the vicious cycle of media violence use and aggression: A test of intervention effects over 30 months. Psychology of Violence, 5(2), 217–226.Google Scholar

Lieberman, J. D., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). A hot new way to measure aggression: Hot sauce allocation. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 25(5), 331–348.Google Scholar

McDermott, R. (2011). Internal and external validity. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Greene, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (pp. 27–40). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moons, W. G. & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Thinking straight while seeing red: The influence of anger on information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 706–720.Google Scholar

Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387.Google Scholar

Nichols, A. L. & Edlund, J. E. (2015). Practicing what we preach (and sometimes study): Methodological issues in experimental laboratory research. Review of General Psychology, 19(2), 191–202.Google Scholar

Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 943. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716Google Scholar

Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17(11), 776–783.Google Scholar

Parrott, D. J. & Lisco, C. G. (2015). Effects of alcohol and sexual prejudice on aggression toward sexual minorities. Psychology of Violence, 5(3), 256–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pettigrew, T. F. (2021). Contextual Social Psychology: Reanalyzing Prejudice, Voting, and Intergroup Contact. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Prentice, D. A. & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prot, S. & Anderson, C. A. (2013). Research methods, design, and statistics in media psychology. In Dill, K. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology (pp. 109–136). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398809.013.0007Google Scholar

Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331Google Scholar

Riva, P., Romero Lauro, L. J., DeWall, C. N., Chester, D. S., & Bushman, B. J. (2015). Reducing aggressive responses to social exclusion using transcranial direct current stimulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(3), 352–356.Google Scholar

Ronquillo, J., Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., et al. (2007). The effects of skin tone on race-related amygdala activity: An fMRI investigation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(1), 39–44.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, R. (1990). How are we doing in soft psychology? American Psychologist, 45(6), 775–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.6.775Google Scholar

Weigold, A. & Weigold, I. K. (2021). Traditional and modern convenience samples: An investigation of college student, Mechanical Turk, and Mechanical Turk college student samples. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211006847Google Scholar

Yuan, R., Xu, Q. H., Xia, C. C., et al. (2020). Psychological status of parents of hospitalized children during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Psychiatry Research, 288, 112953.Google Scholar

Andreß, H-J. (2017). The need for and use of panel data. IZA World of Labor, 352. https://www.doi.org/10.15185/izawol.352Google Scholar

Blossfeld, H. P. & Rohwer, G. (2013). Techniques of Event History Modeling. New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar

Brücker, H., Kroh, M., Bartsch, S., Goebel, J., et al. (2014). The New IAB–SOEP Migration Sample: An Introduction into the Methodology and the Contents. SOEP Survey Papers 216: Series C. German Institute for Economic Research (DIW)/German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).Google Scholar

Brüderl, J., Castiglioni, L., Volker, L., Pforr, K., & Schmiedeberg, C. (2017). Collecting event history data with a panel survey: Combining an electronic event history calendar and dependent interviewing. Methods, Data, Analyses, 11(1), 45–66.Google Scholar

Buck, N. & McFall, S. (2012). Understanding society: design overview. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3(1), 5–17.Google Scholar

Buck, N., Ermisch, J., & Jenkins, S. (1995). Choosing a longitudinal survey design: the issues. Paper ESRC Research Centre on Micro-Social Change, University of Essex. Available at: www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/occasional_papers/pdf/op96-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Busse, B. & Backeberg, L. (2015). Longitudinal research on children and young people in Europe and beyond. In Pollock, G., Ozan, J., Goswami, H., Rees, G., & Stasulane, A. (eds.), Measuring Youth Well-Being. How a Pan-European Longitudinal Survey Can Improve Policy (pp. 71–89). Springer.Google Scholar

Caruana, E. J., Roman, M., Hernández-Sánchez, J., & Solli, P. (2015). Longitudinal studies. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 7(11), 537–540.Google Scholar

CLOSER (2021). Learning hub. Available at: https://learning.closer.ac.uk/learning-modules/introduction/types-of-longitudinal-research/panel-studies/.Google Scholar

Coe, R. D., Duncan, G. J., & Hill, M. S. (1982). Dynamic aspects of poverty and welfare use in the United States. Paper presented at the Conference on Problems of Poverty, Clark University, Worcester, MA, August.Google Scholar

Connelly, R. & Platt, L. (2014). Cohort profile: UK Millennium Cohort Study (MCS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(6), 1719–1725.Google Scholar

Dale, A. & Davies, R. B. (eds.) (1994). Analysing Social and Political Change. A Casebook of Methods. SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, R. B. (1994). From cross-sectional to longitudinal analysis. In Dale, A. & Davies, R. B. (eds.), Analysing Social and Political Change. A Casebook of Methods (pp. 20–40). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Devaney, C. & Rooney, C. (2018). The Feasibility of Conducting a Longitudinal Study on Children in Care or Children Leaving Care within the Irish Context. UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre, National University of Ireland.Google Scholar

Dex, S. (1995). The reliability of recall data: a literature review. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 49(1), 58–89. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/075910639504900105Google Scholar

Doll, R. (2001). Cohort studies: History of the method II. Retrospective cohort studies. Sozial und Präventivmedizin, 46, 152–160.Google Scholar

Duncan, G. J. (2000). Using panel studies to understand household behavior and well-being. In Rose, D. (ed.), Researching Social and Economic Change. The Uses of Household Panel Studies (pp. 54–75). Routledge.Google Scholar

Duncan, G. J., Coe, R. D., Corcoran, M. E., et al. (1984). Years of Poverty, Years of Plenty: The Changing Economic Fortunes of American Workers and Families. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Dziadkowiec, O., Durbin, J., Jayaraman Muralidharan, V., Novak, M., & Cornett, B. (2020). Improving the quality and design of retrospective clinical outcome studies that utilize electronic health records. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine, 1(3), article 4.Google Scholar

Elder, G. H., Jr. (1985) Perspectives on the life-course. In Elder, G. H (ed.) Lifecourse Dynamics. Trajectories and Transitions, 1968–1980 (pp. 23–49). Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Elder, G. H., Jr. & Giele, J. Z. (2009). The Craft of Life Course Research. The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Farrall, S., Hunter, B., Sharpe, G., & Calverley, A. (2016). What ‘works’ when retracting sample members in a qualitative longitudinal study? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(3), 287–300.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., & Welsh, B. C. (2009). Longitudinal-experimental studies. In Piquero, A. R, & Weisburd, D. (eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Criminology (pp. 503–518). Springer.Google Scholar

Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal Analysis with Panel Data. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Firebaugh, G. (1997). Analyzing Repeated Surveys. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Freed Taylor, M. (2000). Dissemination issues for panel studies: Metadata and documentation. In Rose, D. (ed.), Researching Social and Economic Change. The Uses of Household Panel Studies (pp. 146–162). Routledge.Google Scholar

Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement Error Models. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fumagalli, L., Laurie, H., & Lynn, P. (2012) Experiments with methods to reduce attrition in longitudinal surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 176(2), 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghellini, G. & Trivellato, U. (1996) Indagini panel sul comportamento socio-economico di individui e famiglie: una selezionata rassegna di problemi ed esperienze. In Quintano, C. (ed.) Scritti di Statistica Economica 2. Rocco Curto Editore.Google Scholar

Giroux, É. (2011). The origins of the prospective cohort study: American cardiovascular epidemiology and the Framingham Heart Study. Revue d’histoire des sciences, 2(2), 297–318.Google Scholar

Goebel, J., Grabka, M., Liebig, S., et al. (2019). The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), 239(2), 345–360.Google Scholar

Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical Longitudinal Data; Log-Linear Panel, Trend, and Cohort Analysis. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Hakim, C. (1987). Research Design. Strategies and Choices in the Design of Social Research. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Henderson, S. J., Holland, J., McGrellis, S., Sharpe, S., & Thomson, R. (2006). Inventing Adulthoods: A Biographical Approach to Youth Transitions. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Hermanowicz, J. C. (2013). The longitudinal qualitative interview. Qualitative Sociology, 36, 189–208.Google Scholar

Janson, C-G. (1990). Retrospective data, undesirable behavior, and the longitudinal perspective. In Magnusson, D. & Bergman, L.R. (eds.), Data Quality in Longitudinal Research (pp. 100–121). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaelber, D. C., Liu, W., Ross, M., et al. (2016). Diagnosis and medication treatment of pediatric hypertension: A retrospective cohort study. Pediatrics, 138(6), e20162195. https://www.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2195Google Scholar

Kühne, S., Kroh, M., Liebig, S., & Zinn, S. (2020). The need for household panel surveys in times of crisis: The case of SOEP-CoV. Survey Research Methods, 14(2),195–203.Google Scholar

Laurie, H. (2003). From PAPI to CAPI: Consequences for data quality on the British Household Panel Survey. Working Papers of the Institute for Social and Economic Research, paper 2003–14.Google Scholar

Laurie, H. (2013). Panel studies. Oxford Bibliographies in Sociology. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0108Google Scholar

Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leisering, L. & Walker, R. (1998). Preface. In Leisering, L. & Walker, R. (eds.), The Dynamics of Modern Society (pp. x–xvii). The Policy Press.Google Scholar

Lepkowski, J. M. & Couper, M. P. (2002). Nonresponse in the second wave of longitudinal household surveys. In Groves, R. M., Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L., & Little, R. J. A. (eds.). Survey Nonresponse (pp. 259–272). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Linton, M. (1982). Transformations of memory in everyday life. In Neisser, U (ed.), Memory Observed. Remembering in Natural Contexts. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Lynn, P. (ed.) (2009). Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys. John Wiley & Sons,CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longhi, S. & Nandi, A. (2015). A Practical Guide to Using Panel Data. SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magnusson, D. & Bergman, L. R. (eds.) (1990). Data Quality in Longitudinal Research. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Magnusson, D., Bergman, L. R., Rudinger, G., & Torestad, B. (eds.) (1991). Problems and Methods in Longitudinal Research: Stability and Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mayer, K. U. (2015). The German life history study: An introduction. European Sociological Review, 31(2), 137–143.Google Scholar

McManus, S. (2020). Using repeated cross-sectional surveys to measure trends in rates of self-harm. Sage Research Methods Cases: Medicine and Health. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781529733679Google Scholar

Menard, S. (2002). Longitudinal Research, 2nd ed. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Morrow, V. & Crivello, G. (2015). What is the value of qualitative longitudinal research with children and young people for international development? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(3), 267–280.Google Scholar

Neale, B. (2019). What Is Qualitative Longitudinal Research? Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (1979). Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behavior and Development. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, F. T., Fomby, P., & Insolera, N. (2020). The longitudinal revolution: Sociological research at the 50-year milestone of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 83–108.Google Scholar

Platt, L., Knies, G., Luthra, R., Nandi, A., & Benzeval, M. (2020). Understanding society at 10 years. European Sociological Review, 36(6), 976–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ployhart, R. E. & Ward, A.-K. (2011). The “quick start guide” for conducting and publishing longitudinal research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(4), 413–422.Google Scholar

Power, C. & Elliott, J (2006). Cohort profile: 1958 British birth cohort (National Child Development Study). International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(1), 34–41.Google Scholar

Rafferty, A., Walthery, P., & King-Heşe, S. (2015). Analysing Change Over Time: Repeated Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Survey Data. UK Data Service, University of Essex and University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Rajulton, F. (2001). The fundamentals of longitudinal research: An overview special issue on longitudinal methodology. Canadian Studies in Population, 28(2), 169–185.Google Scholar

Rajulton, F. & Ravanera, Z. R. (2000). Theoretical and analytical aspects of longitudinal research. PSC Discussion Papers Series, 14(5), article 1. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/pscpapers/vol14/iss5/1.Google Scholar

Rose, D. (ed.). (2000). Researching Social and Economic Change: The Uses of Household Panel Studies. Routledge.Google Scholar

Ruspini, E. (2002). Introduction to Longitudinal Research. Routledge.Google Scholar

Ruspini, E. (2008). Longitudinal research. An emergent method in the social sciences. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. (eds.), Handbook of Emergent Methods (pp. 437–460). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 843–861.Google Scholar

Samet, J. M. & Muñoz, A. (1998). Evolution of the cohort study. Epidemiologic Reviews, 20(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sarigiani, P. A. & Spierling, T. (2011). Sleeper effect of divorce. In Goldstein, S. & Naglieri, J. A. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_2666Google Scholar

Schonlau, M., Watson, N., & Kroh, M. (2011). Household survey panels: How much do following rules affect sample size? Survey Research Methods, 5(2), 53–61.Google Scholar

Schröder, M. (2011). Retrospective Data Collection in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. SHARELIFE Methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA).Google Scholar

Smeeding, T. M. (2018). The PSID in research and policy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 680(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218798802Google Scholar

Sontag, L. (1971). The history of longitudinal research: Implications for the future. Child Development, 42(4), 987–1002.Google Scholar

Sudman, S. & Bradburn, N.A. (1982). Asking Questions. Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar

Taris, T. W. (2000). A Primer in Longitudinal Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. et al. (1925). Genetic Studies of Genius. Volume I. Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. et al. (1929). Genetic Studies of Genius. Volume II. [Authored by C. M. Cox] The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. et al. (1930). Genetic Studies of Genius. Volume III. [Authored by B. S. Burks, D. W. Jensen, & L. M. Terman] The Promise of Youth: Follow-Up Studies of a Thousand Gifted Children. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomson, R. & Holland, J. (2003). Hindsight, foresight and insight: The challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(2), 233–244.Google Scholar

Thomson, R. & McLeod, J. (2015). New frontiers in qualitative longitudinal research: An agenda for research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(3), 243–250.Google Scholar

Tsao, C. W. & Vasan, R. S. (2015). Cohort profile: The Framingham Heart Study (FHS): overview of milestones in cardiovascular epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 44(6), 1800–1813.Google Scholar

van der Kamp, L. J. T. & Bijleveld, C. C. J. H. (1998). Methodological issues in longitudinal research. In Bijleveld, C. C. J. H. & van der Kamp, L. J. Th (eds.), Longitudinal Data Analysis. Designs, Models and Methods (pp. 1–45). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Venkatesh, A. & Vitalari, N. (1991). Longitudinal surveys in information systems research: An examination of issues, methods, and applications. In Kraemer, K. L. (ed.), The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods (pp. 115–144). Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Voelkle, M. C. & Adolf, J. (2015). History of longitudinal statistical analyses. In Pachana, N. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Geropsychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-080-3_135-1Google Scholar

Vogl, S., Zartler, U., Schmidt, E-M., & Rieder, I. (2018). Developing an analytical framework for multiple perspective. Qualitative longitudinal interviews (MPQLI). International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 177–190.Google Scholar

Wall, W. D. & Williams, H. L. (1970). Longitudinal Studies and the Social Sciences. Heinemann.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, J. S., Lewis, J. M., & Blakeslee, S. (2000). The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: A 25 Year Landmark Study. Hyperion.Google Scholar

Winiarska, A. (2017). Qualitative longitudinal research: Application, potentials and challenges in the context of migration research, Centre of Migration Research (CMR) Working Paper 103/161, Warsaw: University of Warsaw. Available at: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/180968/1/1018535470.pdf.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (1999). European longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood (ELSPAC): Report on a WHO meeting, Bristol, 13–18 September 1999. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/108279.Google Scholar

Ziniel, S. (2008). Telescoping. In Lavrakas, P. J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods,: SAGE Publications. Available at: https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/encyclopedia-of-survey-research-methods/n579.xml?fromsearch=true.Google Scholar

Antoun, C., Couper, M. P., & Conrad, F. G. (2017). Effects of mobile versus PC web on survey response quality: A crossover experiment in a probability web panel. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(S1), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw088Google Scholar

Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-xGoogle Scholar

Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2017). Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.044Google Scholar

Armstrong, B., Reynolds, C., Bridge, G., et al. (2020). How does citizen science compare to online survey panels? A comparison of food knowledge and perceptions between the Zooniverse, Prolific and Qualtrics UK panels. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.575021Google Scholar

Babbie, E. R. (2020). The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

Barnhoorn, J. S., Haasnoot, E., Bocanegra, B. R., & van Steenbergen, H. (2015). QRTEngine: An easy solution for running online reaction time experiments using Qualtrics. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 918–929. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0530-7Google Scholar

Bell, D. (2006). An Introduction to Cybercultures. Routledge.Google Scholar

Beymer, M. R., Holloway, I. W., & Grov, C. (2018). Comparing self-reported demographic and sexual behavioral factors among men who have sex with men recruited through Mechanical Turk, Qualtrics, and a HIV/STI clinic-based sample: Implications for researchers and providers. Archives of sexual behavior, 47(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0932-yGoogle Scholar

Bortree, D. S. (2005). Presentation of self on the Web: An ethnographic study of teenage girls’ weblogs. Education, Communication & Information, 5(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636310500061102Google Scholar

Bronner, F. & Kuijlen, T. (2007). The live or digital interviewer: A comparison between CASI, CAPI and CATI with respect to differences in response behaviour. International Journal of Market Research, 49(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530704900204CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callegaro, M. (2010). Do you know which device your respondent has used to take your online survey. Survey Practice, 3(6), 1–12.Google Scholar

Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009Google Scholar

Chew, C. & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Pandemics in the age of Twitter: Content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PloS One, 5(11), e14118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014118Google Scholar

Christenson, D. P. & Glick, D. M. (2013). Crowdsourcing panel studies and real-time experiments in MTurk. The Political Methodologist, 20(2), 27–32.Google Scholar

Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072Google Scholar

Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970934Google Scholar

Coste, J., Quinquis, L., Audureau, E., & Pouchot, J. (2013). Non response, incomplete and inconsistent responses to self-administered health-related quality of life measures in the general population: Patterns, determinants and impact on the validity of estimates – a population-based study in France using the MOS SF-36. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-44Google Scholar

Crump, M. J., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PloS One, 8(3), e57410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410Google Scholar

Dandurand, F., Shultz, T. R., & Onishi, K. H. (2008). Comparing online and lab methods in a problem-solving experiment. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.428Google Scholar

De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005Google Scholar

De Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-yGoogle Scholar

Denissen, J. J., Neumann, L., & Van Zalk, M. (2010). How the Internet is changing the implementation of traditional research methods, people’s daily lives, and the way in which developmental scientists conduct research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(6), 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410383746Google Scholar

Denscombe, M. (2009). Item non‐response rates: A comparison of online and paper questionnaires. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802054706Google Scholar

Dietrich, S. & Winters, M. S. (2015). Foreign aid and government legitimacy. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2014.31Google Scholar

Dietz, P., Striegel, H., Franke, A. G., et al. (2013). Randomized response estimates for the 12‐month prevalence of cognitive‐enhancing drug use in university students. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 33(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1166Google Scholar

Dillman, D. A. (2000). Procedures for conducting government-sponsored establishment surveys: Comparisons of the total design method (TDM), a traditional cost-compensation model, and tailored design. In Proceedings of American Statistical Association, Second International Conference on Establishment Surveys, Buffalo, New York, June 17–21 (pp. 343–352).Google Scholar

Edlund, J. E., Lange, K. M., Sevene, A. M., et al. (2017). Participant crosstalk: Issues when using the Mechanical Turk. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 13(3), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.13.3.p174Google Scholar

Eysenbach, G. & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ, 323(7321), 1103–1105. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103Google Scholar

Eysenbach, G. & Wyatt, J. (2002). Using the Internet for surveys and health research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(2), e13. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.2.e13Google Scholar

Fan, W. & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015Google Scholar

Fox, F. E., Morris, M., & Rumsey, N. (2007). Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 17(4), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306298754Google Scholar

Galesic, M. & Bosnjak, M. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp031Google Scholar

Gandomi, A. & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007Google Scholar

Greenacre, Z. A. (2016). The importance of selection bias in Internet surveys. Open Journal of Statistics, 6(03), 397. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2016.63035Google Scholar

Greenlaw, C. & Brown-Welty, S. (2009). A comparison of web-based and paper-based survey methods: Testing assumptions of survey mode and response cost. Evaluation Review, 33(5), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X09340214CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grootswagers, T. (2020). A primer on running human behavioural experiments online. Behavior Research Methods, 1(4), 2283–2286. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01395-3Google Scholar

Gureckis, T. M., Martin, J., McDonnell, J., (2016). psiTurk: An open-source framework for conducting replicable behavioral experiments online. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 829–842. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0642-8Google Scholar

Hall, M. G., Grummon, A. H., Lazard, A. J., Maynard, O. M., & Taillie, L. S. (2020). Reactions to graphic and text health warnings for cigarettes, sugar-sweetened beverages, and alcohol: An online randomized experiment of US adults. Preventive Medicine, 137, 106120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106120Google Scholar

Hallett, R. E. & Barber, K. (2014). Ethnographic research in a cyber era. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(3), 306–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241613497749Google Scholar

Hamby, T. & Taylor, W. (2016). Survey satisficing inflates reliability and validity measures: An experimental comparison of college and Amazon Mechanical Turk samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 912–932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415627349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heerwegh, D. & Loosveldt, G. (2008). Face-to-face versus web surveying in a high-internet-coverage population: Differences in response quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 836–846. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn045Google Scholar

Hilbig, B. E. (2016). Reaction time effects in lab-versus web-based research: Experimental evidence. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1718–1724. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0678-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Hoare, K. J., Buetow, S., Mills, J., & Francis, K. (2013). Using an emic and etic ethnographic technique in a grounded theory study of information use by practice nurses in New Zealand. Journal of Research in Nursing, 18(8), 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987111434190Google Scholar

Hohwü, L., Lyshol, H., Gissler, M., et al. (2013). Web-based versus traditional paper questionnaires: A mixed-mode survey with a Nordic perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8), e173. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Ibarra, J. L., Agas, J. M., Lee, M., Pan, J. L., & Buttenheim, A. M. (2018). Comparison of online survey recruitment platforms for hard-to-reach pregnant smoking populations: Feasibility study. JMIR Research Protocols, 7(4), e8071. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.8071Google Scholar

Johnson, N. F. & Humphry, N. (2012). The Teenage Expertise Network (TEN): An online ethnographic approach. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(6), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2011.590160Google Scholar

Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A., & Reips, U. D. (2007). Personalization, authentication and self-disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.012Google Scholar

Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh006Google Scholar

Kenny, A. J. (2005). Interaction in cyberspace: An online focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(4), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03305.xGoogle Scholar

King, D. B., O’Rourke, N., & DeLongis, A. (2014). Social media recruitment and online data collection: A beginner’s guide and best practices for accessing low-prevalence and hard-to-reach populations. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 55(4), 240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038087Google Scholar

Kongsved, S. M., Basnov, M., Holm-Christensen, K., & Hjollund, N. H. (2007). Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: A randomized study of Internet versus paper-and-pencil versions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(3), e25. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25Google Scholar

Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935Google Scholar

Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Kramer, J., Rubin, A., Coster, W., et al. (2014). Strategies to address participant misrepresentation for eligibility in Web‐based research. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1415Google Scholar

Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., et al. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.105Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Lallukka, T., Pietiläinen, O., Jäppinen, S., et al. (2020). Factors associated with health survey response among young employees: A register-based study using online, mailed and telephone interview data collection methods. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8241-8Google Scholar

Larsen, M. C. (2008). Understanding social networking: On young people’s construction and co-construction of identity online. Online Networking: Connecting People. Icfai University Press.Google Scholar

Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., et al. (2009). Social science. Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leach, M. J., Hofmeyer, A., & Bobridge, A. (2016). The impact of research education on student nurse attitude, skill and uptake of evidence‐based practice: A descriptive longitudinal survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(1–2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, H., Wright, K. B., O’Connor, M., & Wombacher, K. (2014). Framing medical tourism: An analysis of persuasive appeals, risks and benefits, and new media features of medical tourism broker websites. Health Communication, 29(7), 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.794412CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lefever, S., Dal, M. & Matthiasdottir, A. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: Advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.xGoogle Scholar

Levay, K. E., Freese, J., & Druckman, J. N. (2016). The demographic and political composition of Mechanical Turk samples. Sage Open, 6(1), 2158244016636433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016636433Google Scholar

Lieberman, D. Z. (2008). Evaluation of the stability and validity of participant samples recruited over the Internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 743–745. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0254Google Scholar

Lindhjem, H. & Navrud, S. (2011). Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation? Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1628–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.002Google Scholar

Link, M. W. & Mokdad, A. H. (2005). Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: A comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66(2), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2005.66.239CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Manninen, V. J. (2017). Sourcing practices in online journalism: an ethnographic study of the formation of trust in and the use of journalistic sources. Journal of Media Practice, 18(2–3), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2017.1375252Google Scholar

Manovich, L. (2012). How to compare one million images? In D. M. Berry (ed.), Understanding Digital Humanities (pp. 249–278). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., et al. (2011). Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity. McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar

Markham, A. N. (2005). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Mason, W. & Watts, D. J. (2012). Collaborative learning in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(3), 764–769. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110069108Google Scholar

McInroy, L. B. (2016). Pitfalls, potentials, and ethics of online survey research: LGBTQ and other marginalized and hard-to-access youths. Social Work Research, 40(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svw005Google Scholar

McMillan, S. J. (2000). The microscope and the moving target: The challenge of applying content analysis to the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700107Google Scholar

Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, E., Khadjesari, Z., White, I., et al. (2009). Methodological challenges in online trials. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(2), e9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1052Google Scholar

Murthy, D. (2011). Emergent digital ethnographic methods for social research. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. (ed.), Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research (pp. 158–179). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nayak, M. S. D. P. & Narayan, K. A. (2019). Strengths and weakness of online surveys. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 24(5), 31–38. doi: 10.9790/0837-2405053138Google Scholar

Nimrod, G. (2018). Technophobia among older Internet users. Educational Gerontology, 44(2–3), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2018.1428145Google Scholar

Parigi, P., Santana, J. J., & Cook, K. S. (2017). Online field experiments: Studying social interactions in context. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516680842Google Scholar

Pechey, R. & Marteau, T. M. (2018). Availability of healthier vs. less healthy food and food choice: An online experiment. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6112-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., et al. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-yGoogle Scholar

Pfeil, U. & Zaphiris, P. (2009). Investigating social network patterns within an empathic online community for older people. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.001Google Scholar

Pullmann, H., Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2009). Global self-esteem across the life span: A cross-sectional comparison between representative and self-selected Internet samples. Experimental Aging Research, 35(1), 20–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730802544708Google Scholar

Radford, J., Pilny, A., Reichelmann, A., et al. (2016). Volunteer science: An online laboratory for experiments in social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(4), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516675866Google Scholar

Ramo, D. E. & Prochaska, J. J. (2012). Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(1), e28. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1878Google Scholar

Rains, S. A., Peterson, E. B., & Wright, K. B. (2015). Communicating social support in computer-mediated contexts: A meta-analytic review of content analyses examining support messages shared online among individuals coping with illness. Communication Monographs, 82(4), 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reimers, S. & Stewart, N. (2015). Presentation and response timing accuracy in Adobe Flash and HTML5/JavaScript Web experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 47(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0471-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F., & Watson, B. (2019). Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research. Routledge.Google Scholar

Russomanno, J., Patterson, J. G., & Tree, J. M. J. (2019). Social media recruitment of marginalized, hard-to-reach populations: Development of recruitment and monitoring guidelines. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 5(4), e14886. https://doi.org/10.2196/14886Google Scholar

Salmons, J. (2014). Qualitative Online Interviews: Strategies, Design, and Skills. SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, S. M. & Foot, K. A. (2004). The Web as an object of study. New Media & Society, 6(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804039912Google Scholar

Shen, G. C. C., Chiou, J. S., Hsiao, C. H., Wang, C. H., & Li, H. N. (2016). Effective marketing communication via social networking site: The moderating role of the social tie. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2265–2270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.040Google Scholar

Simmons, A. D. & Bobo, L. D. (2015). Can non-full-probability internet surveys yield useful data? A comparison with full-probability face-to-face surveys in the domain of race and social inequality attitudes. Sociological Methodology, 45(1), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175015570096Google Scholar

Skitka, L. J. & Sargis, E. G. (2006). The Internet as psychological laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190048Google Scholar

Stern, M. J., Bilgen, I., & Dillman, D. A. (2014). The state of survey methodology: Challenges, dilemmas, and new frontiers in the era of the tailored design. Field Methods, 26(3), 284–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X13519561Google Scholar

Takahashi, Y., Uchida, C., Miyaki, K., et al. (2009). Potential benefits and harms of a peer support social network service on the Internet for people with depressive tendencies: Qualitative content analysis and social network analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(3), e29. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1142Google Scholar

Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wagg, A. J., Callanan, M. M., & Hassett, A. (2019). Online social support group use by breastfeeding mothers: A content analysis. Heliyon, 5(3), e01245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002Google Scholar

Walther, J. B. & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer‐mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 50–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, Y. & Sandner, J. (2019). Like a “frog in a well”? An ethnographic study of Chinese rural women’s social media practices through the WeChat platform. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(3), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1583677Google Scholar

Wang, Y. C., Kraut, R. E., & Levine, J. M. (2015). Eliciting and receiving online support: Using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(4), e99. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3558Google Scholar

Weigold, A., Weigold, I. K., & Russell, E. J. (2013). Examination of the equivalence of self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods. Psychological Methods, 18(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031607Google Scholar

Weinberg, J. D., Freese, J., & McElhattan, D. (2014). Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociological Science, 1, 292–310. https://doi.org/10.15195/v1.a19Google Scholar

Wenz, A. (2021). Do distractions during web survey completion affect data quality? Findings from a laboratory experiment. Social Science Computer Review, 39(1), 148–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319851503Google Scholar

Williams, T. A. & Shepherd, D. A. (2017). Mixed method social network analysis: Combining inductive concept development, content analysis, and secondary data for quantitative analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610807Google Scholar

Woo, S. E., Keith, M., & Thornton, M. A. (2015). Amazon Mechanical Turk for industrial and organizational psychology: Advantages, challenges, and practical recommendations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), JCMC1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.xGoogle Scholar

Wright, K. B. (2016). Communication in health-related online social support groups/communities: A review of research on predictors of participation, applications of social support theory, and health outcomes. Review of Communication Research, 4, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.010Google Scholar

Wright, K. B. (2017). Web-based survey methodology. In Liamputtong, P. (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 1–14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_18-1Google Scholar

Wright, K., Fisher, C., Rising, C., Burke-Garcia, A., Afanaseva, D., & Cai, X. (2019). Partnering with mommy bloggers to disseminate breast cancer risk information: Social media intervention. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e12441. https://doi.org/10.2196/12441CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zhang, J., Calabrese, C., Ding, J., Liu, M., & Zhang, B. (2018). Advantages and challenges in using mobile apps for field experiments: A systematic review and a case study. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917725550Google Scholar

Zhou, H. & Fishbach, A. (2016). The pitfall of experimenting on the Web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 493. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000056Google Scholar

Aiken, L. S. & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Ali, A., Klasa, S., & Yeung, E. (2008). The limitations of industry concentration measures constructed with Compustat data: Implications for finance research. Review of Financial Studies, 22(10), 3839–3871.Google Scholar

Almon, S. (1965). The distributed lag between capital appropriations and expenditures. Econometrica, 33(1), 178–196.Google Scholar

Angrist, J. D. & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30.Google Scholar

Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(4), 495–508.Google Scholar

Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. (2020). Comparison of models for the analysis of intensive longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(2), 275–297.Google Scholar

Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2018). Dynamic structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 359–388.Google Scholar

Astbury, B. & Leeuw, F. L. (2010). Unpacking black boxes: Mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 363–381.Google Scholar

Bai, X. (2018). Forecasting short term trucking rates. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/117796.Google Scholar