Foundations for Studying Relationships

Part I - Foundations for Studying Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 June 2018

Edited by

Anita L. Vangelisti and

Daniel Perlman

Show author details

Anita L. Vangelisti: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman: Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 7 - 76

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acitelli, L. K. (1995). Disciplines at parallel play. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 589–596.CrossRef Google Scholar

Adams, B. N. (1988). Fifty years of family research: What does it mean? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 5–17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Afifi, T. D., Merrill, A. F., & Davis, S. (2016). The theory of resilience and relational load. Personal Relationships, 23, 663–683.CrossRef Google Scholar

Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14, 167–190.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aronson, E., & Linder, D. (1965). Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 156–171.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bahr, S. J. (ed.) (1991). Family research: A sixty-year review, 1930–1990. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Barbee, A. P. (1990). Interactive coping: The cheering up process in close relationships. In Duck, S. W. (with Cohen, R. S.), (eds.) Personal relationships and social support (pp. 46–65). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Barry, W. A. (1970). Marriage research and conflict: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 41–54.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berger, C. R., & Bradac, J. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relationships. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.) The handbook of social psychology: Vol. II. Special fields and applications (3rd edn., pp. 413–484). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (1994). Interpersonal relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 79–129.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260–266.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berscheid, E., & Hatfield Walster, E. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd edn.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E., & Peplau, L. A. (1983). The emerging science of relationships. In Kelley, H. H. et al. (eds.) Close relationships (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., pp. 193–281). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bischoping, K. (1993). Gender differences in conversation topics, 1922–1990. Sex Roles, 28(1–2), 1–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bochner, A. P. (1984). The functions of communication in interpersonal bonding. In Arnold, C. & Bowers, J. (eds.) The handbook of rhetoric and communication (pp. 544–621). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Bogat, G. A., von Eye, A., & Bergman, L. R. (2016). Person-oriented approaches. In Cicchetti, D. (ed.) Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (pp. 797–845). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, S. D. (1998). I’ll go if you will: Do shy persons utilize social surrogates? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 651–669.CrossRef Google Scholar

Braithwaite, D. O., & Baxter, L. A. (eds.) (2006). Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships (2nd edn.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Broderick, C. B. (1970). Editorial. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 495.Google Scholar

Broderick, C. B. (1988). To arrive where we started: The field of family studies in the 1930s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 569–584.CrossRef Google Scholar

Broderick, C. B., & Schrader, S. S. (1981). The history of professional marriage and family therapy. In Gurman, A. S. & Kniskern, D. P. (eds.) Handbook of family therapy (pp. 5–35). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar

Bulcroft, R. A., & White, J. M. (1997). Family research methods and levels of analysis. Family Science Review, 10, 136–153.Google Scholar

Burleson, B. R. (1990). Comforting as social support: Relational consequences of supportive behaviors. In Duck, S. W. (with Cohen, R. S.) (eds.) Personal relationships and social support (pp. 66–82). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713–715.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Byrne, D., & Griffitt, W. (1973). Interpersonal attraction. Annual Review of Psychology, 24, 317–336.CrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell, L., Loving, T. J., & LeBel, E. P. (2014). Enhancing transparency of the research process to increase accuracy of findings: A guide for relationship researchers. Personal Relationships, 21, 531–545.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cooper, M. L., & Sheldon, M. S. (2002). Seventy years of research on personality and close relationships: Substantive and methodological trends over time. Journal of Personality, 70, 783–812.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cramer, D. (1998). Close relationships: The study of love and friendship. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Cupach, W. R., & Spitzberg, B. H. (eds.) (1994). The dark side of interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duck, S. W. (1986). Human relationships. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Duck, S. (ed.) (1997). Handbook of personal relationships (2nd edn.). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Duck, S. W. (2002). Hypertext in the key of G: Three types of “history” as influences on conversational structure and flow. Communication Theory, 12, 41–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duck, S. W. (2014). On Iowa, relationships, and communication: A history of the field of personal relationships. Iowa Journal of Communication, 45, 5–15. Retrieved from https://uni.edu/ica/journal/ica_journal/46_1/duck_final_5–15.pdf Google Scholar

Duck, S. W., & Gilmour., R. (ed.) (1981a). Personal relationships 1: Studying personal relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Duck, S. W., & Gilmour., R. (ed.) (1981b). Personal relationships 2: Developing personal relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Duck, S. W., & Gilmour., R. (ed.) (1981c). Personal relationships 3: Personal relationships in disorder. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Duck, S., & Perlman, D. (1985). The thousand islands of personal relationships: A prescriptive analysis for future explorations. In Duck, S. & Perlman, D. (eds.) Understanding personal relationships research: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 1–15). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Duck, S. W., Rutt, D. J., Hurst, M., & Strejc, H. (1991). Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships: All communication is not created equal. Human Communication Research, 18, 228–267.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duck, S. W., & Sants, H. K. A. (1983). On the origin of the specious: Are personal relationships really interpersonal states? Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 27–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Close relationships and social psychology: Intersections and future paths. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 365–376.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D. (2010). Forgiveness: Integral to a science of close relationships? In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.) Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 347–365). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fine, M. A., & Fincham, F. D. (eds.) (2013). Handbook of family theories: A content-based approach. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRef Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J. (2016). Reflections on the Commitment–Forgiveness Registered Replication Report. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 765–767.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.81.2.263 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383–411.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & Vandellen, M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122, 648–673.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Floyd, K. (2006). Communicating affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fraley, R. C. (2007). Using the Internet for personality research: What can be done, how to do it, and some concerns. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., & Krueger, R. F. (eds.) Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 130–148). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (eds.) (2000). Close relationships: A sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Higbee, K. L., & Wells, M. G. (1972). Some research trends in social psychology during the 1960s. American Psychologist, 27, 963–966.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hinde, R. A. (1979). Towards understanding relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hinde, R. A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Hui, C. M., Finkel, E. J., Fitzsimons, G. M., Kumashiro, M., & Hofmann, W. (2014). The Manhattan effect: When relationship commitment fails to promote support for partners’ interests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 546–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035493 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Huston, T. L., & Levinger, G. (1978). Interpersonal attraction and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 115–156.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johnson, S. M. (2009). Attachment theory and emotionally focused therapy for individuals and couples. In Obegi, J. H. & Berant, E. (eds.) Attachment theory and research in clinical work with adults (pp. 410–433). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Kashy, D. A., Campbell, L., & Harris, D. W. (2006). Advances in data analytic approaches for relationships research: The broad utility of hierarchical linear modeling. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 73–89). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kaslow, F. W. (2000). Continued evolution of family therapy: The last twenty years. Contemporary Family Therapy, 22, 357–386.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E. & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 142–182.Google Scholar

Kowalski, R. M. (ed.) (1997). Aversive interpersonal behaviors. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRef Google Scholar

Larson, R., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Graef, R. (1982). Time alone in daily experience: Loneliness or renewal? In Peplau, L. A. & Perlman, D. (eds.) Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 40–53). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Levinger, G. (1976). A social psychological perspective on marital dissolution. Journal of Social Issues, 32(1), 21–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1974). The role of reward in the formation of positive interpersonal attitudes. In Huston, T. L. (ed.) Foundations of interpersonal attraction (pp. 171–192). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lyons, R., Sullivan, M., Ritvo, P., & Coyne, J. (1995). Relationships in chronic illness and disability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Malloy, T. E., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Social Relations Model: An integrative method for personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 199–225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6494.1986.tb00393.x CrossRef Google Scholar

Metts, S. (2000). Face and facework: Implications for the study of personal relationships. In Dindia, K. & Duck, S. W. (eds.) Communication and personal relationships (pp. 72–94). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.132.5.641 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Newcomb, T. M. (1956). The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11, 575–586.CrossRef Google Scholar

Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., … & Contestabile, M. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Nye, F. I. (1988). Fifty years of family research: 1937–1978. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 305–316.CrossRef Google Scholar

Olson, D. H. (1977). Insiders’ and outsiders’ views of relationships: Research studies. In Levinger, G. & Rausch, H. (eds.) Close relationships: Perspectives on the meaning of intimacy (pp. 115–135). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Overall, N. C., & Simpson, J. A. (2013). Regulation processes in close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 427–451). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perlman, D. (2009). Disciplines contributing to relationship science. In Reis, H. T. & Sprecher, S. (eds.) Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 1349–1353). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Perlman, D., & Duck, S. (2006). The seven seas of the study of personal relationships: From “the thousand islands” to interconnected waterways. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 11–34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rawlins, W. K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reis, H. T. (2012). A history of relationship research in social psychology. In Kruglanski, A. W. & Stroebe, W. (eds.) Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 363–382). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Aron, A., Clark, M. S., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Ellen Berscheid, Elaine Hatfield, and the emergence of relationship science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 558–572.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Duck, S. (ed.) Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Studying social interaction with the Rochester Interaction Record. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 269–318.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 95–112.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rohlfing, M. (1995). “Doesn’t anybody stay in one place any more?” An exploration of the understudied phenomenon of long-distance relationships. In Wood, J. T. & Duck, S. W. (eds.) Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track [Vol. 6. Understanding relationship processes] (pp. 173–196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E. (1987). Responses to dissatisfaction in close relationships: The exit-voice-loyalty-neglect model. In Perlman, D. & Duck, S. (eds.) Intimate relationships: Development, dynamics, and deterioration (pp. 209–237). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. B. (2012). The Investment Model of Commitment Processes. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.) Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218–231). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Finkel, E. J., & Kumashiro, M. (2009). The Michelangelo phenomenon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 305–309.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rutter, V., & Schwartz, P. (1998). The love test: Romance and relationship self-quizzes developed by psychologists and sociologists. New York, NY: Berkley.Google Scholar

Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shebilske, L., & Huston, T. (Organizers). (1996). Designing and carrying out a longitudinal study of relationships: Lessons from the Pair Project. Workshop presented at the meeting of the International Society for the Study of Personal Relationships, Banff, Canada.Google Scholar

Simpson, J. A. (2007). Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 264–268.CrossRef Google Scholar

Solomon, D. H., & Knobloch, L. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795–816.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (eds.) (1998). The dark side of close relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (2004). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sunnafrank, M. (1983). Attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction in communication processes: In pursuit of an ephemeral influence. Communication Monographs, 50, 273–284.CrossRef Google Scholar

Surra, C. A. (1985). Courtship types: Variations in interdependence between partners and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 357–375.CrossRef Google Scholar

Surra, C. A., & Ridley, C. (1991). Multiple perspectives on interaction: Participants, peers, and observers. In Montgomery, B. M. & Duck, S. W. (eds.) Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 35–55). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Tharp, R. G. (1963). Psychological patterning in marriage. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 97–117.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.) (2012). Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Vangelisti, A. L. (1994). Messages that hurt. In Cupach, W. R. & Spitzberg, B. H. (eds.) The dark side of communication (pp. 53–82). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Weber, A. L., & Harvey, J. H. (eds.) (1994). Perspectives on close relationships. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

White, J. M., Klein, D. M., & Martin, T. F. (2015). Family theories: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Winch, R. F. (1958). Mate-selection: A study of complementary needs. Oxford: Harper.Google Scholar

References

Agnew, C. R., & Le, B. (2015). Prosocial behavior in close relationships: An interdependence approach. In Schroeder, D. A. & Graziano, W. G. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 362–375). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 49–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619–645.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Andersen, S. M., Glassman, N. S., Chen, S., & Cole, S. W. (1995). Transference in social perception: The role of chronic accessibility in significant-other representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 41–57.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Aron, A., Lewandowski, G. W., Mashek, D., & Aron, E. N. (2014). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–115). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arriaga, X. B. (2013). An interdependence theory analysis of close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 39–65). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arriaga, X. B., & Agnew, C. R. (2001). Being committed: Affective, cognitive, and conative components of relationship commitment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1190–1203.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Compass. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12131CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumard, N., André, J. B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 59–78.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Beckes, L., & Coan, J. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Compass. doi: 10.111/j.1751–9004.2011.00400CrossRef Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (1986). Mea culpas and lamentations: Sir Francis, Sir Isaac, and the slow progress of soft psychology. In Gilmour, R. & Duck, S. (eds.) The emerging field of personal relationships (pp. 267–286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (1995). Help wanted: A grand theorist of interpersonal relationships, sociologist or anthropologists preferred. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 529–533.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (1999a). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260–266.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berscheid, E. (1999b). Integrating relationship knowledge. In Collins, A. W. & Laursen, B. (eds.) Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 307–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (2003). The human’s greatest strength: Other humans. In Aspinwall, L. G. & Staudinger, U. M. (eds.) A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 37–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berscheid, E., & Collins, A. W. (2000). Who cares? For whom and when, how, and why? Psychological Inquiry, 11, 107–109.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E., & Peplau, L. A. (1983). The emerging science of relationships. In Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (eds.) Close relationships (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar

Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 792.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science, 25, 2209–2216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551162 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2016). Psychological distance moderates the amplification of shared experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(10), 1431–1444. doi: 10.1177/0146167216662869CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boothby, E. J., Smith, L. K., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2017). The world looks better together: How close others enhance our visual experiences. Personal Relationships. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/pere.12201CrossRef Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Intimate relationships (2nd edn.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Brosch, T., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2007). The baby caught my eye: Attention capture by infant faces. Emotion, 7, 685–689.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bugental, D. B. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 187–219.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell, L., & Simpson, J. A. (2013). The blossoming of relationship science. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 3–10). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, L., & Surra, C. (2012). Research on close relationships: Call for an interdisciplinary integration. In. Campbell, L. & Loving, T. J. (eds.) Interdisciplinary research on close relationships: The case for integration (pp. 3–24). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cavallo, J. V., Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2014). Risk regulation in close relationships. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (eds.) Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 237–254). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen, S., Boucher, H., Andersen, S. M., & Saribay, S. A. (2014). Transference and the relational self. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 281–305). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., & Boothby, E. (2013). A strange(r) analysis of morality: A consideration of relational context and the broader literature is needed. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 85–86. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000751CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clark, M. S., Boothby, E. J., Clark-Polner, E., & Reis, H. T. (2015). Understanding prosocial behavior requires understanding relational context. In Schroeder, D. A. & Graziano, W. G. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 329–245). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., & Lemay, E. P. Jr. (2010). Close relationships. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Gardner, L. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 5th edn., pp. 898–940). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., Lemay, E. P., & Reis, H. T. (2018, in press). Other people as situations: Relational context shapes psychological phenomena. In Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R., & Funder, D. C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of situations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Advanced online publication.Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. R. (2012). A theory of communal (and exchange) relationships. In van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.) Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 232–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., Ouellette, R., Powell, M. C., & Milberg, S. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 94–103.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clark-Polner, E., & Clark, M. S. (2014). Understanding and accounting for relational context is critical for social neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 127. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00127 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cushman, F., Young, L., & Greene, J. D. (2010). Our multi-system moral psychology. Towards a consensus view. In Doris, J. and the Moral Psychology Research Group (eds.) The moral psychology handbook (pp. 47–71). London: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Downey, G., & Feldman, S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eibach, R. P., Libby, L. K., & Erlinger, J. (2012). Unrecognized changes in the self contribute to exaggerated judgments of external decline. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34, 193–203.CrossRef Google Scholar

Eibach, R. P., Libby, L. K., & Gilovich, T. D. (2003). When change in the self is mistaken for change in the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 917931.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Eibach, R. P., & Mock, S. E. (2011). The vigilant parent: Parental role salience affects parents’ risk perceptions, risk-aversion, and trust in strangers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 694–697.CrossRef Google Scholar

Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113–147.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fessler, D. M. T., & Holbrook, C. (2013). Friends shrink foes: The presence of comrades decreases the envisioned physical formidability of an opponent. Psychological Science, 24, 797–802.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fessler, D. M. T., Holbrook, C., Pollack, J. S., & Hahn-Holbrook, J. (2014). Stranger danger: Parenthood increases the envisioned bodily formidability of menacing men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 109–117.CrossRef Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J. (2014). The I3 model: Metatheory, theory and evidence. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. (eds.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 1–104). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (2008). Pro-relationship motivation: An interdependence theory analysis of situations with conflicting interests. In Shah, J. Y. & Gardener, W. L. (eds.) Handbook of motivation science (pp. 547–560). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383–411.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J., Campbell, L., & Overall, N. C. (2013). The science of intimate relationships. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228–245.CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenwall, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G., & Galperin, A. (2013). Error management in relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 234–254). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Holmes, J. G. (2012). The future of relationship science. In Campbell, L., La Guardia, J. G., Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (eds.), The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology: Vol. 12. The science of the couple (pp. 231–253). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Med. 7:e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316CrossRef Google Scholar

Huston, T. L., & Vangelisti, A. L. (1995). How parenthood changes marriage. In Fitzpatrick, M. A. & Vangelisti, A. L. (eds.) Explaining family interactions (pp. 147–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ickes, W., & Hodges, S. D. (2013). Empathic accuracy in close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 348–373). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Julian, L. J. (2011). Measures of anxiety: State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale‐Anxiety (HADS‐A). Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11), s467–s472.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Karandashev, V. (2016). Romantic love in cultural context. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual influences on marriage: Implications for policy and intervention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 171–174.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (eds.) (1983). Close relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N., Reis, H., Rusbult, C., & Van Lange, P. A. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., & Cohen, A. B. (2012). A history of evolutionary social psychology. In Kruglanski, A. W. & Stroebe, W. (eds.) Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 101–122). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., & White, A. E. (2013). Relationships from an evolutionary life history perspective. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 13–38). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Knapp, M. L., Vangelisti, A. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2013). Interpersonal communication and human relationships (7th edn.). New York, NY: Pearson Higher Education.Google Scholar

Knee, C. R., & Petty, K. N. (2013). Implicit theories of relationships: Destiny and growth beliefs. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 183–198). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Krems, J. A., Neel, R., Neuberg, S. L., Puts, D. A., & Kenrick, D. T. (2016). Women selectively guard their (desirable) mates from ovulating women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 551–573.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J., McNulty, J. K., & Kumashiro, M. (2010). The doormat effect: When forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 734–749.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Rouby, D. A., & Miller, S. L. (2007). Can’t take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389–401.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 343–349.CrossRef Google Scholar

Maner, J. K., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). The basic cognition of jealousy: An evolutionary perspective. European Journal of Personality, 22, 31–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, L. J., Hathaway, G., Labester, K., Mirali, S., Acland, E. L., Niederstrasser, N., … Mogil, J. S. (2015). Reducing social stress elicits emotional contagion of pain in mouse and human strangers. Current Biology, 25, 1–7.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McNulty, J. (2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 787–790.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McNulty, J. K. & Russell, V. M. (2016). Forgive and forget, or forgive and regret? Whether Forgiveness leads to less or more offending depends on offender agreeableness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 616–631.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics and change (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Miller, R. S. (2015). Intimate relationships (7th edn.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2009). The architecture of interdependent minds: A motivation-management theory of mutual responsiveness. Psychological Review, 116, 908–928.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (2011). Interdependent minds: The dynamics of close relationships. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neel, R., Kenrick, D. T., White, A. E., & Neuberg, S. L. (2016). Individual differences in fundamental social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 887–907.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., & Schaller, M. (2010). Evolutionary social psychology. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) Handbook of social psychology (pp. 761–796). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Pataki, S. P., Fathelbab, S., Clark, M. S., & Malinowski, C. H. (2013). Communal strength norms in the United States and Egypt. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 7, 77–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reis, H. T. (2006). The relationship context of social psychology. In van Lange, P. A. M. (ed.) Bridging social psychology (pp. 253–260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reis, H. T. (2009). Relationships are situations, and situations involve relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 266.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reis, H. T. (2012). A brief history of relationship research in social psychology. In Kruglanski, A. W. & Stroebe, W. (eds.) Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 363–382). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., & Arriaga, X. B. (2015). Interdependence and related theories. In Gawronski, B. & Bodenhausen, G. V. (eds.) Theory and explanation in social psychology (pp. 305–327). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., & Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Mashek, D. J. & Aron, A. (eds.) Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In Duck, S. (ed.) Handbook of research in personal relationships (pp. 367–389). London: Wiley.Google Scholar

Rogers, L. O., Niwa, E. Y., & Way, N. (2017). The friendships of racial-ethnic minority youth in context. In Cabrera, N. J. & Levendecker, B. (eds.) Handbook of positive development of minor youth (pp. 267–280), New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. B. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.) Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 218–231). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Hannon, P. A., Stocker, S. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2005). Forgiveness and relational repair. In Worthington, E. L. Jr. (ed.) Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 185–205). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387.CrossRef Google Scholar

Salovey, P., & Rodin, J. (1984). Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 780–792.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sarkisian, N., & Gerstel, N. (2016). Does singlehood isolate or integrate? Examining the link between marital status and ties to kin, friends, and neighbors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33, 361–384.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schnall, S., Harber, K. D., Stefanucci, J. K., & Proffitt, D. R. (2008). Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1246–1255.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sherman, G. D., Haidt, J., & Coan, J. A. (2009). Viewing cute images increases behavioral carefulness. Emotion, 9, 282.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Simpson, J. A. (2017). Evolution and relationships: The integration continues. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11, 212–219.CrossRef Google Scholar

Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 181–227.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tesser, A., & Smith, J. (1980). Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don’t always help the one you like. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 582–590.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thibaut, J., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.CrossRef Google Scholar

Van Lange, P. A. M., & Rusbult, C. R. (2012). Interdependence theory. In van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.) Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 251–272). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Williamson, G. M., & Clark, M. S. (1989). Providing help and desired relationship type as determinants of changes in moods and self-evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 722–734.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zebrowitz, L. A., Brownlow, S., & Olson, K. (1992). Baby talk to the babyfaced. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 143–158.CrossRef Google Scholar

References

Beck, L. A., Pietromonaco, P. R., DeBuse, C. J., Powers, S. I., & Sayer, A. G. (2013). Spouses’ attachment pairings predict neuroendocrine, behavioral, and psychological responses to marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 388–424. doi: 10.1037/a0033056CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., Trueman, M., & Stiller, J. (2012). Examining the components of children’s peer liking as antecedents of school adjustment. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 303–325.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Borelli, J. L., Sbarra, D. A., Randall, A. K., Snavely, J. E., St. John, H. K., & Ruiz, S. K. (2013). Linguistic indicators of wives’ attachment security and communal orientation during military deployment. Family Process, 52, 535–554. doi: 10.1111/famp.12031CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Borelli, J. L., West, J. L., Weekes, N. Y., & Crowley, M. J. (2014). Dismissing child attachment and discordance for subjective and neuroendocrine responses to vulnerability. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 584–591.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Call, V. R. A. (1990). Respondent cooperation and requests for contacts in longitudinal research: A national survey of families and households (NSF Working Paper No. 35). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology. Retrieved from www.ssc.wisc.edu/cde/nsfhwp/nsfh35.pdf Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., Cupach, W. R., & Messman, S. J. (1995). Relationship conflict: Conflict in parent–child, friendship, and romantic relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Caspi, A., & Bem, D. J. (1990). Personality continuity and change across the life course. In Pervin, L. A. (ed.) Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 549–575). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Clark, M. S. (1985). Implications of relationship type for understanding compatibility. In Ickes, W. (ed.) Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 119–140). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Reis, H. T. (2015). Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 275–297.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Holman, T. B., Birch, P. J., Carroll, J. S., Doxey, C., Larson, J. H., & Linford, S. T. (2001). Premarital prediction of marital quality or breakup: Research, theory, and practice. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Holman, T. B., Busby, D. M., & Larson, J. H. (1989). PREParation for marriage [questionnaire]. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar

Ickes, W. (1983). A basic paradigm for the study of unstructured dyadic interaction. In Reis, H. T. (ed.) New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science: Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction (pp. 5–21). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Ickes, W. (1994). Methods of studying close relationships. In Weber, A. L. & Harvey, J. H. (eds.) Perspectives on close relationships (pp. 18–44). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Ickes, W. (2002). Subjective and intersubjective paradigms for the study of social cognition. The New Review of Social Psychology, 1, 112–121.Google Scholar

Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V., Garcia, S., & Stinson, L. (1990). Implementing and using the dyadic interaction paradigm. In Hendrick, C. & Clark, M. S. (eds.) Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 16–44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ickes, W., & Tooke, W. (1988). The observational method: Studying the interaction of minds and bodies. In Duck, S. W., Hay, E. D., Hobfoll, S. E., Ickes, W., & Montgomery, B. M. (eds.) Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (pp. 79–97). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Karraker, A., & Latham, K. (2015). In sickness and in health? Physical illness as a risk factor for marital dissolution later in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56, 420–435.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8788–8790.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Krause, S., Back, M. D., Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2014). Implicit interpersonal attraction in small groups automatically activated evaluations predict actual behavior toward social partners. Social Psychological and Personality Science 5, 671–679. doi: 10.1177/1948550613517723CrossRef Google Scholar

Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010). Patterns of change in marital satisfaction over the newlywed years. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72, 1171–1187.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Leary, M. R. (2004). Introduction to behavioral research methods (4th edn.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Lemay, E. P. Jr., Clark, M. S., & Feeney, B. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834–853.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13, 254–271.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maguire, W. J. (1973). The yin and yang of progress in social psychology: Seven koan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 446–456.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mehl, M. R., & Robbins, M. L. (2012). Naturalistic observation sampling: The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR). In Mehl, M. R. & Conner, T. S. (eds.) Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 176–192). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., … & Contestabile, M. (2015). Promoting an open research culture: Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility. Science (New York, NY), 348(6242), 1422–1425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374 CrossRef Google Scholar

Oboler, A., Welsh, K., & Cruz, L. (2012). The danger of big data: Social media as computational social science. First Monday, 17(7). doi: 10.5210/fm.v17i7.3993Google Scholar

Paolacci, G., & Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., & Arriaga, X. B. (1997). Interdependence theory. In Duck, S. (ed.) Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (2nd edn., pp. 221–250). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Russell, M. A. (2014). Mining the social web: Data mining Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+, GitHub, and more (2nd edn.), Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar

Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2015). Research methods in psychology (10th edn.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Simpson, J. A., Oriña, M. M., & Ickes, W. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 881–893.CrossRef Google Scholar

Snijders, T. A., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). The social relations model for family data: A multilevel approach. Personal Relationships, 6, 471–486.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., Carlson, E. A., & Collins, W. A. (2005). The development of the person. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar

References

Biesanz, J. C., Deeb-Sossa, N., Papadakis, A. A., Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9, 30–52.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Bonito, J. A., DeCamp, M. H., & Coffman, M. (2006). Participation, information, and control in small groups: An actor–partner interdependence model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10, 16–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J. G., & Kashy, D. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510–531.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cillessen, A. H. N., Jiang, S. L., West, T. V., & Laszkowski, D. K. (2005). Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 165–172.CrossRef Google Scholar

Garcia, R. L., Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2015). Moderation in the actor–partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships, 22, 8–29.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E., Smith, J. Z., & Kashy, D. A. (2010). Preadoptive factors predicting lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples’ relationship quality across the transition to adoptive parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 221–232.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kashy, D. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2008). Comparing MLM and SEM approaches to analyzing developmental dyadic data: Growth curve models of hostility in families. In Card, N. A., Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (eds.) Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences (pp. 165–190). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kashy, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., Burt, S. A., & McGue, M. (2008). Growth curve models for indistinguishable dyads using multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling: The case of adolescent twins’ conflict with their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 44, 316–329.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kashy, D. A., & Kenny, D. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (eds.) Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451–477). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (eds.) The handbook of social psychology (4th edn., Vol 1, pp. 233–265). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 359–366.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kivlighan, D. M., Gelso, C. J., Ain, S., Hummel, A. M., & Markin, R. D. (2015). The therapist, the client, and the real relationship: An actor–partner interdependence analysis of treatment outcome. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 314–320.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kordahji, H., Bar-Kalifa, E., & Rafaeli, E. (2015). Attachment insecurity as a moderator of cardiovascular arousal effects following dyadic support. Journal of Research in Personality, 57, 89–99.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lambe, L., Mackinnon, S. P., & Stewart, S. H. (2015). Dyadic conflict, drinking to cope, and alcohol-related problems: A psychometric study and longitudinal actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 697–707.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lawrence, E., Yoon, J., Langer, A., & Ro, E. (2009). Is psychological aggression as detrimental as physical aggression? The independent effects of psychological aggression on depression and anxiety symptoms. Violence and Victims, 24, 20–35.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). The common fate model for dyadic data: Variations of a theoretically important but underutilized model. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 140–148.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ledermann, T., & Macho, S. (2009). Mediation in dyadic data at the level of the dyads: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 661–670.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ledermann, T., Macho, S., & Kenny, D. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor–partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 595–612.CrossRef Google Scholar

Livi, S., Alessandri, G., Caprara, G. V., & Pierro, A. (2015). Positivity within teamwork: Cross-level effects of positivity on performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 230–235.CrossRef Google Scholar

Loeys, T., Cook, W., De Smet, O., Wietzker, A., & Buysse, A. (2014). The actor–partner interdependence model for categorical dyadic data: A user-friendly guide to GEE. Personal Relationships, 21, 225–241.CrossRef Google Scholar

Loeys, T., & Molenberghs, G. (2013). Modeling actor and partner effects in dyadic data when outcomes are categorical. Psychological Methods, 18, 220–236.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Raudenbush, S. W., Brennan, R. T., & Barnett, R. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 167–174.CrossRef Google Scholar

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Collins, W., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners’ personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251–259.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Spain, S. M., Jackson, J. J., & Edmonds, G. W. (2012). Extending the actor–partner interdependence model for binary outcomes: A multilevel logistic approach. Personal Relationships, 19, 431–444.CrossRef Google Scholar

References

Ahrons, C. (1994). The good divorce. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant–mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969–1025.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Allen, M., & Burrell, N. (1996). Comparing the impact of homosexual and heterosexual parents on children: Meta-analysis of existing research. Journal of Homosexuality, 32, 19–35.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Argyle, M., & Henderson, M. (1985). The rules of relationships. In Duck, S. & Perlman, D. (eds.) Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 63–84). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Asendorpf, J. B. (2003). Head‐to‐head comparison of the predictive validity of personality types and dimensions. European Journal of Personality, 17, 327–346.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75, 43–88.Google Scholar PubMed

Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs, 4 (Part 2), 99–102.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (1995). Help wanted: A grand theorist of interpersonal relationships, sociologist or anthropologist preferred. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 529–533.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Biblarz, T. J., & Stacey, J. (2010). How does the gender of parents matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 3–22.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Brito, R., Waldzus, S., Sekerdej, M., & Schubert, T. (2011). The contexts and structures of relating to others: How memberships in different types of groups shape the construction of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 406–432.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 173–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, O., Luxenburg, A., Dattner, N., & Matz, D. E. (1999). Suitability of divorcing couples for mediation: A suggested typology. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 329–344.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Crouter, A. C., & Manke, B. (1997). Development of a typology of dual-earner families: A window into differences between and within families in relationships, roles, and activities. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 62–75.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davis, K. E., & Todd, M. J. (1985). Assessing friendship: Prototypes, paradigm cases and relationship description. In Duck, S. & Perlman, D. (eds.) Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 17–38). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. (1981). Social behavior of young siblings in the family context: Differences between same-sex and different-sex dyads. Child Development, 52, 1265–1273.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fincham, F. D. (2004). Communication in marriage. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) The handbook of family communication (pp. 83–103). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fiske, A. P. (1993). Social errors in four cultures: Evidence about universal forms of social relations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 463–494.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P. (1995). Social schemata for remembering people: Relationships and person attributes that affect clustering in free recall of acquaintances. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 5, 305–324.Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P. (2000). Human sociality: Relational models theory overview. Retrieved October 2, 2016, from www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fiske/relmodov.htm Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P., & Haslam, N. (1996). Social cognition is thinking about relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 143–148.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P., & Haslam, N. (1997). The structure of social substitutions: A test of relational models theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 725–729.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P., Haslam, N., & Fiske, S. (1991). Confusing one person with another: What errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 656–674.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1988). Between husbands and wives: Communication in marriage. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Koerner, A. F. (2005). Family communication schemata: Effects on children’s resiliency. In Dunwoody, S., Becker, L. B., McLeod, D., & Kosicki, G., (eds.) The evolution of key mass communication concepts: Honoring Jack M. McLeod (pp. 113–136). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Richie, L. D. (1994). Communication schemata within the family: Multiple perspectives on family interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 275–301.CrossRef Google Scholar

Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1992). Four types of premarital couples: An empirical typology based on PREPARE. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 10–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Furman, W., Simon, V. A., Shaffer, L., & Bouchey, H. A. (2002). Adolescents’ working models and styles for relationships with parents, friends, and romantic partners. Child Development, 73, 241–255.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gaines, S. O. (1995). Classifying dating couples: Gender as reflected in traits, roles, and resulting behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 75–94.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gelbard, R., Goldman, O., & Spiegler, I. (2007). Investigating diversity of clustering methods: An empirical comparison. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 63, 155–166.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gibbs, E. D., Teti, D. M., & Bond, L. A. (1987). Infant–sibling communication: Relationships to birth-spacing and cognitive and linguistic development. Infant Behavior and Development, 10, 307–323.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gold, D. T. (1989). Sibling relationships in old age: A typology. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 34–54.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6–15.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce: The relationship between marital process and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Harrington, C., & Metzler, A. (1997). Are ACOAs different from adult children of dysfunctional families without alcoholism: A look at committed intimate relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 102–107.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haslam, N. (1994). Mental representation of social relationships: Dimensions, laws, or categories? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 575–584.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Haslam, N. (1995). Factor structure of social relationships: An examination of relational models and resource exchange theories. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 217–227.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haslam, N. (1999). Taxometric and related methods in relationships research. Personal Relationships, 6, 519–534.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haslam, N. (2009). Relationship types and taxonomies. In Reis, H. T. & Sprecher, S. (eds.) Encyclopedia of human relationships (Vol. 3, pp. 1353–1358). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Haslam, N., & Fiske, A. P. (1992). Implicit relationship prototypes: Investigating five theories of the cognitive organization of social relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 441–474.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hinde, R. A. (1996). Describing relationships. In Aughagen, A. E. & von Salisch, M. (eds.) The diversity of human relationships (pp. 7–35), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kantor, D., & Lehr, W. (1976). Inside the family. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kent, P., Jensen, R. K., & Kongsted, A. (2014). A comparison of three clustering methods for finding subgroups in MRI, SMS or clinical data: SPSS Two Step Cluster analysis, Latent Gold and SNOB. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14, 113.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Kerns, K. A. (2000). Types of preschool friendships. Personal Relationships, 7, 311–324.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kliem, S., Foran, H. M., Beller, J., Hahlweg, K., Stöbel‐Richter, Y., & Brähler, E. (2015). Dimensional latent structure of relationship quality: Results of three representative population samples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1190–1201.CrossRef Google Scholar

Knapp, M. L. (1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child Development, 59, 135–146.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Koerner, A. F. (2006). Models of relating-not relationship models: Cognitive representations of relating across interpersonal relationship domains. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 629–653.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koerner, A. F., & Cvancara, K. E. (2002). The influence of conformity orientation on communication patterns in family conversations. The Journal of Family Communication, 2, 132–152.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48, 59–75.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002a). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12, 70–91.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002b). Understanding family communication patterns and family functioning: The roles of conversation orientation and conformity orientation. Communication Yearbook, 26, 37–69.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002c). You never leave your family in a fight: The impact of families of origins on conflict-behavior in romantic relationships. Communication Studies, 53, 234–251.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2013). Communication in intact families. In Vangelisti, A. L. (ed.) The Routledge handbook of family communication (2nd edn., pp. 129–144). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kressel, K., Jaffee, N., Tuchman, B., Watson, C., & Deutsch, M. (1980). A typology of divorcing couples: Implications for mediation and the divorce process. Family Process, 19, 101–116.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lamela, D., Figueiredo, B., Bastos, A., & Feinberg, M. (2016). Typologies of post-divorce coparenting and parental well-being, parenting quality and children’s psychological adjustment. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 47, 716–728.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lavee, Y. & Olson, D. H. (1993). Seven types of marriage: Empirical typology based on ENRICH. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19, 325–340.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Leary, T. (1955). The theory and measurement methodology of interpersonal communication, Psychiatry, 18, 147–161.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In Hetherington, E. (vol. ed.) & Mussen, P. H. (series ed.) Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (4th edn., pp. 1–101). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Mares, M. L. (1995). The aging family. In Fitzpatrick, M. A. & Vangelisti, A. L. (eds.) Explaining family interaction (pp. 344–374). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Marwell, G., & Hage, J. (1970). The organization of role-relationships: A systematic description. American Sociological Review, 35, 884–900.CrossRef Google Scholar

McLeod, J. M. & Chaffee, S. H. (1972). The construction of social reality. In Tedeschi, J. (ed.) The social influence process (pp. 50–59). Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar

Meehl, P. E. (1995). Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology. American Psychologist, 50, 266–275.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1976). A typology of family environments. Family Process, 15, 357–371.CrossRef Google Scholar

Murphy, S. O. (1993). Siblings and the new baby: Changing perspectives. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 8, 277–288.Google Scholar PubMed

Olson, D. H. (1981). Family typologies: Bridging family research and family therapy. In Filsinger, E. E. & Lewis, R. A. (eds.) Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches (pp. 74–89). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Olson, D. H. (1993). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In Wals, F. (ed.) Normal family processes (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Olson, D. H. & Fowers, B. J. (1993). Five types of marriage: An empirical typology based on ENRICH. The Family Journal, 3, 196–207.CrossRef Google Scholar

Parkinson, L. (1987). Separation, divorce, and families. London: Macmillan Education.CrossRef Google Scholar

Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (eds.) (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Reiss, D. (1981). The family’s construction of reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ritchie, L. D., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Family communication patterns: Measuring interpersonal perceptions of interpersonal relationships. Communication Research, 17, 523–544.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, L. B., Bowen, G. L., & Richman, J. M. (1995). Communication in three types of dual-career marriages. In Fitzpatrick, M. A. & Vangelisti, A. L. (eds.) Explaining family interaction (pp. 257–289). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schutz, W. C. (1958). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.Google Scholar

Shulman, S. (1995). Typology of close friendships, relationship models and friendship reasoning in early adolescence. In Shulman, S. (ed.) Close relationships and socioemotional development (pp. 109–127). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Shulman, S., & Knafo, D. (1997). Balancing closeness and individuality in adolescent close relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21, 687–702.CrossRef Google Scholar

Slicker, E. K. (1998). Relationship of parenting style to behavioral adjustment in graduating high school seniors [Electronic Version]. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 27, 345–372.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stewart, R. B., Kozak, A. L., Tingley, L. M., Goddard, J. M., Blake, E. M., & Cassel, W. A. (2001). Adult sibling relationships: Validation of a typology. Personal Relationships, 8, 299–324.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stewart, R. B., Verbrugge, K. M., & Beilfuss, M. C. (1998). Sibling relationships in early adulthood: A typology. Personal Relationships, 5, 59–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stocker, C. M., & McHale, S. M. (1992). The nature and family correlates of preadolescents’ perceptions of their sibling relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 179–195.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stormshak, E. A., Bellanti, C. J., & Bierman, K. L. (1996). The quality of sibling relationships and the development of social competence and behavioral control in aggressive children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 79–89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Swenson, A. R., Zvonkovic, A. M., Rojas-McWhinney, J., & Gerst, K. N. (2015). A couple analysis of relationship perceptions among couples who face work demands. Personal Relationships, 22, 153–171.CrossRef Google Scholar

Toennies, F. (1957). Community and society (Loomis, C. P., trans.) New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

VanLear, C. A., Koerner, A. F., & Allen, D. (2006). Relationship typologies. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 91–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vuchinich, S., & Angelelli, J. (1995). Family interaction during problem solving. In Fitzpatrick, M. A. & Vangelisti, A. L. (eds.) Explaining family interaction (pp. 177–205). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weingarten, H., & Leas, S. (1987). Levels of marital conflict model: A guide to assessment and intervention. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 58, 407–417.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weiss, R. S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Rubin, Z. (ed.) Doing unto others: Joining, molding, conforming, helping, loving (pp. 17–26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Weiss, R. S. (1998). A taxonomy of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 671–683.CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, J. S., Riggs, S. A., & Kaminski, P. L. (2016). A typology of childhood sibling subsystems that may emerge in abusive family systems. The Family Journal, 24, 378–384.CrossRef Google Scholar

Zeanah, C. H., Benoit, D., Barton, M., Regan, C., Hirshberg, L. M., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1993). Representations of attachment in mothers and their one-year-old infants. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 278–286.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Book contents

Part I - Foundations for Studying Relationships

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive