Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-758b78586c-44n2s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-11-28T15:54:28.777Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

1 - The Educational Benefits of Self-Related Information Processing

from Part I - The Self and Its Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2019

K. Ann Renninger
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania
Suzanne E. Hidi
University of Toronto
Get access


In this chapter, we describe psychological and neuroscientific research that demonstrates the unique characteristics of self-related information processing. These characteristics have been shown to produce beneficial effects on basic functions (such as perception, attention, and actions), as well as on higher-order cognitive activities (including memory). The findings are explained by their correspondence to the neurocorrelates of self-related information processing. Northoff's (2016) basic model of the self, which describes self-specificity to be a fundamental aspect of the brain's spontaneous (resting) activity, provides further clarification of these results. After considering the unique characteristics of self-related information processing, we describe the potential benefits of considering findings from neuroscience for educational practice by pointing to the positive outcomes of utility value interventions. More specifically, these types of interventions, which are grounded in the expectancy-value theory of student motivation, are examples of how self-related information processing can have educational benefits by increasing motivation and learning.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ainely, M. & Hidi, S. (2014). Interest and engagement. In Pekrun, R. & Linnenbrink-Gracia, L. (Eds.), International handbook of emotions and education (pp. 205–27). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., Shirey, L. L., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1987). Interestingness of children's reading material. In Snow, R. E. & Farr, M. J. (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction, Vol. III: Cognitive and affective process analyses (pp. 287–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carter, R. M., MacInnes, J. J., Huettel, S. A., & Adcock, R. A. (2009). Activation in the VTA and nucleus accumbens increases in anticipation of both gains and losses. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(21). doi: 10.3389/neuro.08.021.2009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Apfel, N., & Master, A. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313(5791), 1307–10. doi: 10.1126/science.1128317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, S. J., Brady-Van den Bos, M., & Turk, D. J. (2011). Exploring the effects of ownership and choice on self-memory biases. Memory, 19(5), 449–61. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.584388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., Macdonald, L. M., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 312–18. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Argembeau, A., Collette, F., Van der, Linden, Laureys, S., Del Fiore, G., Degueldre, C., … Salmon, E. (2005). Self-referential reflective and its relationship with rest: A PET study. NeuroImage, 25(2), 616–24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Greck, M., Enzi, B., Prösch, U., Gantman, A., Tempelmann, C., & Northoff, G. (2010). Decreased neuronal activity in reward circuitry of pathological gamblers during processing of personal relevant stimuli. Human Brain Mapping, 31(11), 1802–12. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20981Google ScholarPubMed
de Greck, M., Rotte, M., Paus, R., Moritz, D., Thiemann, R., Proesch, U., … Northoff, G. (2008). Is our self based on reward? Self-relatedness recruits neural activity in the reward system. NeuroImage, 39(4), 2066–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Greck, M., Supady, A., Thiemann, R., Tempelmann, C., Bogerts, B., Forschner, L., … Northoff, G. (2009). Decreased neural activity in reward circuitry during personal reference in abstinent alcoholics – A fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 30(5), 1691–704. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20634CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denny, B. T., Kober, H., Wager, T. D., & Oschner, K. N. (2012). A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self and other judgements reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medical prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(8) 1742–52. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Elliott, R., Newman, J. L., Longe, O. A., & William Deakin, J. F. (2004). Instrumental responding for rewards is associated with enhanced neuronal response in subcortical reward systems. NeuroImage, 21, 984–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ersner-Hershfield, H., Wimmer, G. E., & Knutson, B. (2009). Saving for the future self: Neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(1), 8592. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn042CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérriz, C. G., … Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE – Life Science Education, 15(3), Es5. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frings, C. & Wentura, D. (2014). Self-priorization processes in action and perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1737. doi: 10.1037/a0037376Google ScholarPubMed
Gaspard, H., Dicke, A. L., Flunger, B., Brisson, B. M., Hafner, I., Nagengast, B., & Trautwein, U. (2015). Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1226–40. doi: 10.1037/dev0000028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013). Information seeking, curiosity and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11) 585–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimm, S., Ernst, J., Boesiger, P., Schuepbach, D., Hell, D., Boeker, H., & Northoff, , (2009). Increased self-focus in major depressive disorder is related to neural abnormalities in subcortical-cortical midline structures. Human Brain Mapping, 30(8), 2617–27. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486–96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E., Priniski, S. J., & Tibbetts, Y. (2016, April). Why is writing about value so powerful? Paper presented as part of the symposium, The roles of value and interest in promoting learning. (K. A. Renninger, Chair). American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Giffen, C., Blair, S. S., Rouse, D. I., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 375–89. doi: 10.1037/a0034679CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Prinski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2015). Closing the achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745–65. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000075Google ScholarPubMed
Harackiewicz, J. M., Hulleman, C. S., & Pastor, D. A. (2009, August). Developmental trajectories of interest within semester-long courses in high school science and introductory psychology. Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Biennial Conference. Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. R., Hulleman, C. S., & Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents motivate their teens in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychological Science, 23(8), 899906. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220–7. doi: 10.1177/2372732216655542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harackiewicz, J. M., Tibbetts, Y., Canning, E., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Harnessing values to promote motivation in education. In Karabenick, S. A. & Urdan, T. C. (Eds.), Motivational interventions (Vol. 18, pp. 71105). UK: Emerald. doi: 10.1108/S0749-742320140000018002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, P. R., Schultz, P. W., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 136. doi: 10.1037/a0029691Google ScholarPubMed
Hidi, S. (2016). Revisiting the role of rewards in motivation and learning: Implications of neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 6193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidi, S. & Baird, W. (1986). Interestingness: A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science, 10(2), 179–94.Google Scholar
Hidi, S. E., Renninger, K. A., & Northoff, G. (2017). The development of interest and self-related processing. In Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., & Craven, R. G. (Eds.), International advances in self research, Volume 6: SELF – Driving positive psychology and well-being. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press.Google Scholar
Hu, C., Di, X., Eickhoff, S. B., Zhang, M., Peng, K., Guo, H., & Sui, J. (2016). Distinct and common aspects of physical and psychological self-representation in the brain: A meta-analysis of self-bias in facial and self-referential judgements. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 61, 197207. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulleman, C. S. & Barron, K. E. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: Bridging theory, research, and practice. In Corno, L. & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 160–71). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Hulleman, C. & Harackiewicz, J. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5698), 1410–12. doi: 10.1126/science.1177067CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 880–95. doi: 10.1037/a0019506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2016). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387404. doi: 10.1037/edu0000146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, G. W. & Sui, J. (2015). The salient self: Social saliency effects based on self-bias. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, S. & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of campus climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324–45. doi: 10.2307/2673270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, J. S., Canning, E. A., Rozek, C. S., Clarke, E., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. (2016). The role of mothers’ communication in promoting motivation for math and science course-taking in high school. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 27, 4964. doi: 10.1111/jora.12253CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T., & Camerer, C. F., (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20, 963–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knyazev, G. G. (2013). EEG correlates of self-referential processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 114. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazowski, R. A. & Hulleman, C. S. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 602–40. doi: 10.3102/0034654315617832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, H. C., Changeux, J. P., & Rosenstand, A. (2016). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of self-awareness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 83, 765–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.004Google ScholarPubMed
Matsui, J., Liu, R., & Kane, C. M. (2003). Evaluating a science diversity program at UC Berkeley: More questions than answers. Cell Biology Education, 2, 117–21. doi: 10.1187/cbe.02-10-0050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Meer, L., Costafreda, S., Aleman, A., & David, A. S. (2010). Self-reflection and the brain: A theoretical review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies with implications for schizophrenia. Neuroscience & Behavioral Reviews, 34(6), 935–46. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. P., Schirmer, J., Ames, D. L., & Gilbert, D. T. (2011). Medial prefrontal cortex predicts intertemporal choice. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(4), 857–66. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21479CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, J. M., Macrae, C. N., Heatherton, T. F., Wyland, C. L., & Kelley, W. M. (2006). Neuroanatomical evidence for distinct cognitive and affective components of self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(9), 1586–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northoff, G. (2016). Is the self a higher-order or fundamental function of the brain? The “basis model of self-specificity” and its encoding by the brain's spontaneous activity. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1–4), 203–22. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1111868CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northoff, G. & Hayes, D. J. (2011). Is our self nothing but reward? Biological Psychiatry, 69(11), 1019–25. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M. D., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain–A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage, 31(1), 440–57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northoff, G., Schneider, F., Rotte, M., Matthiae, C., Tempelmann, C., Wiebking, C., … Panksepp, J., (2009). Differential parametric modulation of self-relatedness and emotions in different brain regions. Human Brain Mapping, 30(2), 369–82. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, D., Terry, K., & Bybee, D., (2002). A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 313–26. doi: 10.1006/jado.2002.0474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeiffer, U. J., Vogeley, K., & Schilbach, L. (2013). From gaze cueing to dual eye-tracking: Novel approaches to investigate the neural correlates of gaze in social interaction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2516–28. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phan, K. L., Taylor, S. F., Welsh, R. C., Ho, S. H., Britton, J. C., & Liberzon, I. (2004). Neural correlates of individual ratings of emotional salience: A trial-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21(2), 768–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.072CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, P. & Northoff, G. (2011). How is our self related to midline regions and the default-mode network? NeuroImage, 57(3), 1221–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renninger, K. A. (2009). Interest and identity development in instruction: An inductive model. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 114. doi: 10.1080/00461520902832392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renninger, K. A. & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, E. Q. & Wigfield, A. (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 146–63. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1154792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilbach, L., Bzdok, D., Timmermans, B., Fox, P. T., Laird, A. R., Vogeley, K., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2012). Introspective minds: Using ALE meta-analyses to study commonalities in the neural correlates of emotional processing, social & unconstrained cognition. PLoS One, 7(2), e30920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013, August). Toward a second person. Behavioural Brain Science, 36(4), 393414. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1200066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, W. (2007). Behavioural theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 87115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweder, R. (1993). The cultural psychology of the emotions. In Lewis, M. & Haviland, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 417–31). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Shell, D. F., Brooks, D. W., Trainin, G., Wilson, K. M., Kauffman, D. F., & Herr, L. M. (2010). The unified learning model: How motivational, cognitive, and neurobiological sciences inform best teaching practices. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3215-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovacek, S. P., Whittinghill, J. C., Tucker, S., Rath, K. A., Peterfreund, A. R., Kuehn, G. D., & Reinke, Y. G. (2011). Minority students severely underrepresented in science, technology engineering and math. Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 516.Google Scholar
Sui, J. & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). Super-size me: Self biases increase to larger stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 550–8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0690-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1105–17. doi: 10.1037/a0029792Google ScholarPubMed
Sui, J., Liu, M., Mevorach, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). The salient self: The left intraparietal sulcus responds to social as well as perceptual-salience after self-association. Cerebral Cortex, 25(4), 1060–8. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht302Google ScholarPubMed
Sui, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2014). Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(19), 7607–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221862110Google Scholar
Symons, C. S. & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tricomi, E. M., Delgado, M. R., & Fiez, J. A. (2004). Modulation of caudate activity by action contingency. Neuron, 41, 281–92. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00848-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walkington, C. (2013). Using adaptive learning technologies to personalize instruction to student interests: The impact of relevant contexts on performance and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(94), 932–45. doi: 10.1037/a0031882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkington, C., Petrosino, A., & Sherman, M. (2013). Supporting algebraic reasoning through personalized story scenarios: How situational understanding mediates performance and strategies. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(2), 89120. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2013.770717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Moran, J. M., Nieto-Castanon, A., Triantafyllou, C., Saxe, R., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2011). Associations and dissociations between default and self-reference networks in the human brain. NeuroImage, 55(1), 225–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wigfield, A. & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 135. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2002a). Children's motivation during the middle school years. In Aronson, J. (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Contributions of social psychology (pp. 159–84). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/b978-012064455-1/50011-7Google Scholar
Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2002b). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation. A volume in the Educational Psychology Series (pp. 249–84). San Diego, CA: Acade5mic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7Google Scholar
Woolley, M. E., Rose, R. A., Orthner, D. K., Akos, P. T., & Jones-Sanpei, H. (2013). Advancing academic achievement through career relevance in the middle grades: A longitudinal evaluation of CareerStart. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1309–35. doi: 10.3102/0002831213488818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhan, Y., Xiao, X., Li, F., Fan, W., & Zhong, Y. (2016). Reward promotes self-face processing: An event-related potential study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 735. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zink, C. F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M. E., Chappelow, J. C., & Berns, G. S. (2004). Human striatal responses to monetary reward depend on saliency. Neuron, 42, 509–17. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00183-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats