Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-594f858ff7-hf9kg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-06-07T22:02:12.971Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "corePageComponentUseShareaholicInsteadOfAddThis": true, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Part I - Creativity and Domain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2017

Edited by
James C. Kaufman ,
Vlad P. Glăveanu  and
John Baer
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Vlad P. Glăveanu
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Domain-generality and domain-specificity have long been debate fodder for the creativity field. As the two positions have begun to converge, the need emerges for a new reference work that both explores the general topic and offers in-depth coverage of creativity for particular domains. Our goal for this edited handbook is to offer a reference for existing research, provoke ideas for collaborations and interactions, and propel the field forward as we consider the domains that may be covered in future editions.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains , pp. 1 - 60
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.
Baer, J. (2011). Why grand theories of creativity distort, distract, and disappoint. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21(1), 73–100.
Baer, J. (2013). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 16–29.
Baer, J. (2016). Domain specificity of creativity. San Diego: Academic Press.
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J.C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.
Courtois, C., Mechant, P., & De Marez, L. (2012). Communicating creativity on YouTube: What and for whom?. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 129–134.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1998, 290–309.
Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of human creativity (pp. 273–296). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fink, A., & Woschnjak, S. (2011). Creativity and personality in professional dancers. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 754–758.
Gangadharbatla, H. (2010). Technology component: a modified systems approach to creative thought. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 219–227.
Hass, R. W. (2015). Feasibility of online divergent thinking assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 85–93.
Kaufman, J. C. (2001a). Genius, lunatics, and poets: Mental illness in prize-winning authors. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 20, 305–314.
Kaufman, J. C. (2001b). The Sylvia Plath effect: Mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 37–50.
Kaufman, J. C. (Ed.) (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). I bask in dreams of suicide: Mental illness, poetry, and women. Review of General Psychology, 6, 271–286.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 14, 15–25.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Intelligent testing with Torrance. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 99–102.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (Eds.). (2005a). Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005b). The amusement park theory of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., & Baer, J. (2010). Finding young Paul Robesons: The search for creative polymaths. In Preiss, D. D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching, and human development (pp. 141–162). New York: Springer.
Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., Baer, J., & Ivcevic, Z. (2010). Creativity polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartener. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 380–387.
Kucirkova, N., & Sakr, M. (2015). Child–father creative text-making at home with crayons, iPad collage & PC. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 17, 59–73.
Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for the content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182.
Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Reisman, F. K. (2017). Please teacher, don’t kill my kid’s creativity: Creativity embedded into K-12 teacher preparation and beyond. In Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd edn.) (pp. 162–189). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sawyer, K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Shute, V. J., & Ventura, M. (2013). Measuring and supporting learning in games: Stealth assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2014). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (2004). Creativity: From potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tagg, C. (2013). Scraping the barrel with a shower of social misfits: Everyday creativity in text messaging. Applied Linguistics, 34, 480–500.
Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297–310.

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–187.
Baer, J. (1997). Gender differences in the effects of anticipated evaluation on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 25–31.
Baer, J. (1998a). Gender differences in the effects of extrinsic motivation on creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 18–37.
Baer, J. (1998b). The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.
Baer, J. (2009). Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century? Invited Address, presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA., August 2009.
Baer, J. (2010). Is creativity domain specific? In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 321–341). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baer, J. (2011a) Domains of creativity. In Runco, M.A., and Pritzker, S.R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd edn., pp. 404–408), Vol. 1. San Diego: Academic Press.
Baer, J. (2011b). Four (more) arguments against the Torrance Tests. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. 5, 316–317.
Baer, J. (2011c). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309–313.
Baer, J. (2016). Domain specificity of creativity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.
Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121–130.
Feist, G. J. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
Hennessey, B. A. (2010). Intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom: Have we come full circle? In Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 329–361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hennessey, B. A. (2015). If I were Secretary of Education: A focus on intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 187–192.
Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Martinage, M. (1989). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14, 212–227.
Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253–270.
Ivcevic, Z., & Mayer, J. D. (2009). Mapping dimensions of creativity in the life-space. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 152–165.
Jung, R. E. (2014). Evolution, creativity, intelligence, and madness: “Here Be Dragons.” Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 784.
Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by gender and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065–1082.
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman-Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298–308.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004a). The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) Model of creativity. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 14, 15–25.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004b). Sure, I’m creative – but not in mathematics!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 143–155.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The Amusement Park Theory of Creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains (pp. 321–328). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Intelligent testing with Torrance. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 99–102.
Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: A structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119–134.
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.
Kim, K. H. (2009). Are the Torrance tests still relevant in the 21st century?. Invited Address, presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston, MA., August 2009.
Kim, K. H. (2011a). Proven reliability and validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 314–315.
Kim, K. H. (2011b). The APA 2009 Division 10 debate: Are the Torrance tests still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 302–308.
McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10.
McKay, A. S., Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (in press). Measuring the muses: Validating the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.
Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for the content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179–182.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Treffert, D. A. (2014). Savant syndrome: Realities, myths and misconceptions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 564–571.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.

References

Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2012). Psychoticism and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 341–350.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Oxford: Westview Press, Inc.
Angelou, M. (1982). Creativity: It’s the thought that counts (Mary Ardito, Interviewer). Bell Telephone Magazine, 1, 32.
Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 183–187.
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173–177.
Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37, 165–178.
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75–105.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education 3–13, 43, 371–381.
Barbot, B., & Lubart, T. (2012). Creative thinking in music: Its nature and assessment through musical exploratory behaviors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 231–242.
Barbot, B., Randi, J., Tan, M., Levenson, C., Friedlaender, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). From perception to creative writing: A multi-method pilot study of a visual literacy instructional approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 167–176.
Barbot, B., Tan, M., Randi, J., Santa-Donato, G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2012). Essential skills for creative writing: Integrating multiple domain-specific perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 209–223.
Barbot, B., & Tinio, P. P. L. (2015). Where is the “g” in creativity? A specialization-differentiation hypothesis. Frontiers of Human Neuroscience, 8, 1041.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457.
Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15, 6–23.
Benedek, M., Borovnjak, B., Neubauer, A. C., & Kruse-Weber, S. (2014). Creativity and personality in classical, jazz and folk musicians. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 117–121.
Berkowitz, A. L. (2010). The improvising mind: Cognition and creativity in the musical moment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Boccia, M., Piccardi, L., Palermo, L., Nori, R., & Palmiero, M. (2015). Where do bright ideas occur in our brain? Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies of domain-specific creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01195
Caroff, X., & Lubart, T. I. (2012). Multidimensional approach to detecting creative potential in managers. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 13–20.
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.
Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Hallowell, K., Huesman, R., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa Inventiveness Inventory: Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 157–163.
Csikszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper/Collins.
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.
Davis, C. D., Kaufman, J. C., & McClure, F. H. (2011). Non-cognitive constructs and self-reported creativity by domain. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 188–202.
Detterman, D., & Ruthsatz, J. (1999). Toward a more comprehensive theory of exceptional abilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 148–158.
DeYoung, C. G. (2014). Openness/intellect: A dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In Cooper, M. L. & Larsen, R. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 369–399), Vol. 4. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.
Dowds, B. N. (1998). Helping students make connections across disciplines. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 55–60.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R., & Blumenfeld, P. B. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The road to expert performance: empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ericsson, K. A., Roring, R. W., & Nandagopal, K. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3–56.
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147–178.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Eysenck, H. J., & Furnham, A. (1993). Personality and the Barron-Welsh Art Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 837–838.
Feinstein, J. S. (2006). The nature of creative development. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 2, 290–309.
Feist, G. J. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Feist, G. J. (2006). The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Feist, G. J. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113–130). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88.
Feldman, D. H. (1989). Creativity: Proof that development occurs. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 240–260). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fink, A., & Woschnjak, S. (2011). Creativity and personality in professional dancers. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 754–758.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49, 165–180.
Glăveanu, V. P., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 12–21.
Gluck, J., Ernst, R., & Unger, F. (2002). How creative define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 55–67.
Gray, C. E. (1966). A measurement of creativity in western civilization. American Antropologist, 68, 1384–1417.
Gute, G., Gute, D. S., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (2008). The early lives of highly creative persons: The influence of the complex family. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 343–357.
Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Altmann, E. M., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert? Intelligence, 45, 34–45.
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28, 95–105.
Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 2–3, 247–258.
Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask … But sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students’ creative self-efficacy and its predictors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 154–164.
Karwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 547–558.
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindset: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62–70.
Karwowski, M. (2015a). Notes on creative potential and its measurement. Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 4–17.
Karwowski, M. (2015b). Peers effect on students’ creative self-concept. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49, 211–225.
Karwowski, M. (2016). Dynamic of the creative self-concept: Changes and reciprocal relations between creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 99–104.
Karwowski, M. (2017). Subordinated and rebellious creativity at school. In Beghetto, R. A. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Creative Contradictions in Education (pp. 89–114). The Netherlands: Springer.
Karwowski, M., & Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Cambridge companion to reason and development (pp. 302–326). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers’ effect on students’ creative self-concept is moderated by students’ gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 1–8.
Karwowski, M., & Jankowska, D. M. (2016). Four faces of creativity at school. In Beghetto, R. A. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 357–354). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The big five, the huge two and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 214–232.
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2017). Creative self-concept: A surface characteristic of creative personality. In Feist, G., Reiter-Palmon, R. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity and personality (pp. 84–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E., & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big Five personality factors as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 215–232.
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298–308.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure, I’m creative – but not in math! Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 143–155.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165.
Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., Baer, J., & Ivcevic, Z. (2010). Creative polymathy: What Benjamin Franklin can teach your kindergartener. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 380–387.
Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: Structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119–134.
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: A four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 233–255.
Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114–124.
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality, 84, 248–258.
Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 106–130.
King, L. A., McKee Walker, L., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203.
Kwasnik, M., & Karwowski, M. (under review). The order matters: Asking about creative activity calibrates creative self-concept.
Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 217–239.
Lebuda, I. (2014). Big-C research – the big challenge? Reflections from research into eminent creativity in the light of the investment theory of creativity. Creativity: Theories-Research-Application, 1, 33–45.
Lebuda, I., & Csikszentmihályi, M. C. (2017). Me, myself, I, and creativity: Self-concepts of eminent creators. In Karwowski, M. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity, (pp. 137–152). San Diego: Academic Press.
Lebuda, I., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Tell me your name and I’ll tell you how creative your work is: Author’s name and gender as factors influencing assessment of product originality in four different domains. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 137–142.
Lim, H. S., & Choi, J. N. (2009). Testing an alternative relationship between individual and contextual predictors of creative performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 117–136.
Lubart, T. I., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 41–51.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137–150.
Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity, primary process cognition, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 409–414.
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.
Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1994). Creative thinking and creative performance in Adolescents as predictors of creative attainments in adults. In Subotnik, R. F. & Arnold, K. D. (Eds.), Beyond Terman. Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 212–228). New Jersey: Ablex.
Mourgues, C., Barbot, B., Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). The interaction between culture and the development of creativity. In Jensen, L. A. (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of human development and culture: An interdisciplinary perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Onarheim, B., & Friis-Olivarius, M. (2013). Applying the neuroscience of creativity to creativity training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 76, 56.
Perleth, C., & Heller, K. A. (1994). The Munich longitudinal study of giftedness. In Subotnik, R. F. & Arnold, K. D. (Eds.), Beyond Terman. Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 77–114). New Jersey: Ablex.
Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof really in the pudding? Reanalysis of Torrance’s longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.
Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Plucker, J. A., & Zabelina, D. (2009). Creativity and interdisciplinarity: One creativity or many creativities? ZDM, The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 5–11.
Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 53–66.
Richards, R. (1990). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and health: ‘Afterview’ for CRJ issues on creativity and health. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 300–326.
Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity: Process and way of life—Four key issues. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 189–215). Cambridge: University Press.
Robertson, K. F., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 346–351.
Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 115–137.
Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: The link between polymathy and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 127–151). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Rostan, S. M. (2005). Educational intervention and the development of young art students’ talent and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 237–261.
Runco, M. A. (1990). Implicit theories and ideational creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 234–252). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 318–324.
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66–75.
Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 361–368.
Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., & Yurkovich, J. M. (2011). The genetic basis of creativity and ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 376–380.
Russ, S. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Ruthsatz, J., Detterman, D. K., Griscom, W. S., & Cirullo, B. A. (2008). Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice. Intelligence, 36, 330–338.
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd edn.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., & Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 183–188.
Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009b). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 139–148.
Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009a). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, higher-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–1090.
Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19–34.
Simonton, D. K. (1991). Creative productivity through the adult years. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 15, 13–16.
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: The Guilford Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1998). Career paths and creative lives: A theoretical perspective on late life potential. In Adams-Price, C. (Ed.), Creativity and successful aging: Theoretical and empirical approaches (pp. 3–18). New York: Springer.
Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of domain-specific disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 441–452.
Simonton, D. K. (2013). Creative performance, expertise acquisition, individual differences, and developmental antecedents: An integrative research agenda. Intelligence, 45, 66–73.
Snow, C. P. (1964). The two cultures. London: Cambridge University Press.
Spear, L. P. (2013). Adolescent neurodevelopment. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 7–13.
Stavridou, A., & Furnham, A. (1996). The relationship between psychoticism, trait creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 143–153.
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Creativity as a decision. American Psychologist, 57, 376.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 1–5.
Szen-Ziemiańska, J. (2015). Uwarunkowania osiągnięć twórczych na wczesnych etapach kariery naukowej. [Conditions of creative achievement in the early periods of scientific career]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277–293.
Urban, K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The test for Creative Thinking – Drawing production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6, 272–280.
Urban, K. K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 177–191.
von Stumm, S., Chung, A., & Furnham, A. (2011). Creative ability, creative ideation and latent classes of creative achievement: What is the role of personality? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 107–114.
Weiner, E. (2016). The geography of genius. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg, R. J. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Welch, G., Papageorgi, I., Haddon, E., Creech, A., Morton, F., & de Bézanac, C. (2008). Musical genre and gender as factors in higher education learning in music. Research Papers in Education, 23, 203–217.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 4, 297–310.
Woody, E., & Claridge, G. (1977). Psychoticism and thinking. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 241–248.

References

Bain, A. (1977). The senses and the intellect. Robinson, D. N., Ed. Washington, DC: University Publications of America. (Original work published 1855).
Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge.
Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 72–110.
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.
Carson, S. H. (2014). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 198–221). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
Cope, D. (2014). Virtual genius. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of genius (pp. 166–182). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cziko, G. A. (2001). Universal selection theory and the complementarity of different types of blind variation and selective retention. In Heyes, C., & Hull, D. L. (Eds.), Selection theory and social construction: The evolutionary naturalistic epistemology of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 15–34). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Dailey, A., Martindale, C., & Borkum, J. (1997). Creativity, synesthesia, and physiognomic perception. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 1–8.
Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2011). From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso’s 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 360–369.
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). GRIT: Perseverence and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101.
Einstein, A., & Infeld, L. (1938). The evolution of physics: The growth of ideas from early concepts to relativity and quanta. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117, 994–1024.
Hofstadter, D. (2002). Staring Emmy straight in the eye – and doing my best not to flinch. In Dartnall, T. (Ed.), Creativity, cognition, and knowledge: An interaction (pp. 67–104). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Kantorovich, A., & Ne’eman, Y. (1989). Serendipity as a source of evolutionary progress in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 20, 505–529.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–13.
Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Koza, J. R. (1992). Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 12, 181–194.
Maier, N. R. F. (1940). The behavioral mechanisms concerned with problem solving. Psychological Review, 47, 43–58.
Mandler, G. (1995). Origins and consequences of novelty. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 9–25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249–268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
Miller, A. I. (2001). Einstein, Picasso: Space, time and the beauty that causes havoc. New York: Basic Books.
Ness, R. B. (2013). Genius unmasked. New York: Oxford University Press.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nickles, T. (2003). Evolutionary models of innovation and the Meno problem. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 54–78). New York: Elsevier Science.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.
Poincaré, H. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method (Halstead, G. B., Trans.). New York: Science Press.
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.
Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.
Rostan, S. M. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 97–110.
Rothenberg, A. (2015). Flight from wonder: An investigation of scientific creativity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 92–96.
Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Creativity, innovation, and nonobviousness. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 12, 461–487.
Sawyer, R. K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 137–154.
Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N., Patalano, A. L., & Yaniv, I. (1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 65–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494.
Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Constrained combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179.
Simonton, D. K. (2011a). Creativity and discovery as blind variation and selective retention: Multiple-variant definitions and blind-sighted integration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 222–228.
Simonton, D. K. (2011b). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158–174.
Simonton, D. K. (2012a). Combinatorial creativity and sightedness: Monte Carlo simulations using three-criterion definitions. International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22(2), 5–17.
Simonton, D. K. (2012b). Creativity, problem solving, and solution set sightedness: Radically reformulating BVSR. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 48–65.
Simonton, D. K. (2012c). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.
Simonton, D. K. (2013a). Creative problem solving as sequential BVSR: Exploration (total ignorance) versus elimination (informed guess). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 1–10.
Simonton, D. K. (2013b). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why sightedness is inversely related to creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 253–266.
Simonton, D. K. (2013c). What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity. In Chan, J. & Thomas, K. (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 69–83). Cheltenham Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.
Simonton, D. K. (2014). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.
Simonton, D. K. (2015a). Numerical odds and evens in Beethoven’s nine symphonies: Can a computer really tell the difference? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33, 18–35.
Simonton, D. K. (2015b). Thomas Alva Edison’s creative career: The multilayered trajectory of trials, errors, failures, and triumphs. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 2–14.
Simonton, D. K., & Damian, R. I. (2013). Creativity. In Reisberg, D. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 795–807). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sober, E. (1992). Models of cultural evolution. In Griffiths, P. (Ed.), Trees of life: Essays in philosophy of biology (pp. 17–39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1981, July 31). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 5015–504.
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted? Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 159–176.
Thagard, P. (2012). Creative combination of representations: Scientific discovery and technological invention. In Proctor, R. & Capaldi, E. J. (Eds.), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thagard, P., & Stewart, T. C. (2011). The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 35, 1–33.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso’s Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23–54.
Weisberg, R. W. (2014). Case studies of genius: Ordinary thinking, extraordinary outcomes. In Simonton, D. K. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of genius (pp. 139–165). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wolport, L. (1994). The unnatural nature of science: Why science does not make (common) sense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×