Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Schopenhauer on the Self
- 2 Schopenhauer and Knowledge
- 3 The Fourfold Root
- 4 Schopenhauer, Kant, and the Methods of Philosophy
- 5 Will and Nature
- 6 The Influences of Eastern Thought on Schopenhauer’s Doctrine of the Thing-in-Itself
- 7 Ideas and Imagination
- 8 Schopenhauer’s Narrower Sense of Morality
- 9 Schopenhauer on Death
- 10 Schopenhauer’s Pessimism
- 11 Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Dionysus
- 12 Schopenhauer, Will, and the Unconscious
- 13 Schopenhauer and Wittgenstein
- Bibliography
- Index
Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 May 2006
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Schopenhauer on the Self
- 2 Schopenhauer and Knowledge
- 3 The Fourfold Root
- 4 Schopenhauer, Kant, and the Methods of Philosophy
- 5 Will and Nature
- 6 The Influences of Eastern Thought on Schopenhauer’s Doctrine of the Thing-in-Itself
- 7 Ideas and Imagination
- 8 Schopenhauer’s Narrower Sense of Morality
- 9 Schopenhauer on Death
- 10 Schopenhauer’s Pessimism
- 11 Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Dionysus
- 12 Schopenhauer, Will, and the Unconscious
- 13 Schopenhauer and Wittgenstein
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Arthur Schopenhauer lived from 1788 to 1860. His thought took shape early in his life, in the decade from 1810 to 1820, yet until the 1850s he was virtually unknown, and the period in which he became a powerful influence began only in the second half of the nineteenth century. He admired Rossini and Bellini but inspired Wagner, knew Goethe, and met Hegel, but was an influence after his death on Thomas Mann, Nietzsche, and the young Wittgenstein. His vision of the world is in some respects more bleak and cynical than we might expect for its period, more akin to that of existentialism or even of Samuel Beckett. Schopenhauer's world is neither rational nor good, but rather is an absurd, polymorphous, hungry thing that lacerates itself without end and suffers in each of its parts. None of us is in control even of our own nature; instead, we are at the mercy of the blind urge to exist and propagate that stupefies us into accepting the illusion that to be a human individual is worthwhile. In truth it would have been better had nothing existed. Although this philosophy originated in a pre-Darwinian and pre-Freudian age, it has a prescient cutting edge that can make the later time of evolutionary theory, psychoanalysis, and the 'Great' War seem the more truly Schopenhauerian era. 'By what mere blind propulsion did all these thousands of human creatures keep on mechanically living?' wrote Edith Wharton in a war novel of 1923, sounding, perhaps unknowingly, a Schopenhauerian note.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Schopenhauer , pp. 1 - 17Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999
- 7
- Cited by