Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T13:03:13.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - ‘We sing as one individual’? Popular misconceptions of ‘Gilbert and Sullivan’

from Part I - Background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2011

Get access

Summary

As head of the Vienna Hofoper, Gustav Mahler developed his credo that in Each performance an opera has to be created anew. This led to his conviction: ‘What people of the theatre call tradition is nothing more than their laziness and their slipshod work’. This notion is especially relevant for branches of musical theatre where the shadows of ‘tradition’ are especially long and hauntingly darkening, as in the so-called Gilbert and Sullivan, or Savoy operas.

W. S. Gilbert suggested in an 1891 interview that ‘the burlesque stage was in a very unclean state’ and that he and Sullivan had made up their minds ‘to do all in our power to wipe out the grosser element’. Arthur Sullivan said in 1885 that in comic opera he ‘adhered to the principles of art which I had learned in the production of more solid works, and no musician who analyses the score of those light operas will fail to find the evidence of seriousness and solidity pointed out’. Gilbert believed that some of Sullivan's music was out of place in comic opera, and this is not surprising, considering that he seems to have been more concerned about burlesque and moral standards – ‘never to let an offending word escape our characters’ – whereas his collaborator reveals a wider range of artistic ambition. From the mid-1880s onwards there are repeated statements by Gilbert to the effect that the text ‘must be played exactly as I wrote it’. There is good reason to assume that this was not only due to issues of copyright but also because Gilbert, the librettist, feared losing control of the works. Usually the performers had to be true to the melodies but not necessarily the words, so he tried to take possession of the operas again as a producer.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×