Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T12:26:24.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Balancing Regulation, Innovation and Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2022

Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Michael Lowery Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Turku, Finland
Mark Fenwick
Affiliation:
Kyushu University, Japan
Nikolaus Forgó
Affiliation:
Universität Wien, Austria
Till Bärnighausen
Affiliation:
Universität Heidelberg
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
AI in eHealth
Human Autonomy, Data Governance and Privacy in Healthcare
, pp. 309 - 450
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Abrams, C, ‘Google’s Effort to Prevent Blindness Shows AI Challenges’ Wall Street Journal, 26 January 2019, www.wsj.com/articles/googles-effort-to-prevent-blindness-hits-roadblock-11548504004, accessed 19 June 2020.Google Scholar
Ameringer, C, ‘State-Based Licensure of Telemedicine: The Need for Uniformity but Not a National Scheme’ (2011) 14(1) Journal of Health Care Law and Policy 55–85.Google Scholar
Bach, I, ‘Medical Apps – wer haftet bei Fehlern?’ (2017) 50(6) Gynäkologe 473–78.Google Scholar
Barnes, JK, ‘Telemedicine A Conflict of Laws Problem Waiting to Happen – How Will Interstate and International Claims be Decided?’ (2006) 28(2) Houston Journal of International Law 491–529.Google Scholar
Bashshur, R and Shannon, G, History of Telemedicine: Evolution, Context, and Transformation (Liebert 2009).Google Scholar
Bourassa Forcier, M and others ‘Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Health Care Through Data Access: Can the GDPR Act as a Beacon for Policymakers?’ (2019) 6(1) Journal of Law and the Biosciences 317–35.Google Scholar
Brkan, M, ‘Data Protection and Conflict-of-Laws: A Challenging Relationship’ (2016) 2(3) European Data Protection Law Review 1–18.Google Scholar
Cheshire, North and Fawcett, Private International Law 15th ed (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Cloud, M, ‘Robots Are Coming: A Discussion of Choice-of-Law Issues and Outcomes in Telesurgical Malpractice’ (2019) 6(3) Texas A&M Law Review 707–30.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services, ‘Telemedicine Licensure Report’ Office for the Advancement of Telehealth, Centre for Telemedicine, 2003.Google Scholar
Dicey, Morris and Collins, The Conflict of Laws I, 15th ed (Thomson Reuters 2012).Google Scholar
Dicey, Morris and Collins, The Conflict of Laws II, 15th ed (Thomson Reuters 2012).Google Scholar
Dickinson, A, The Rome II Regulation (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Staff Working Document on the Applicability of the Existing EU Legal Framework to Telemedicine Services’ SWD(2012) 414 final, 6 December 2012, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SWD:2012:0414:FIN:EN:PDFGoogle Scholar
European Commission, ‘Staff Working Document on Liability for Emerging Digital Technologies’, SWD(2018) 137 final, 25 April 2018, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018SC0137Google Scholar
Fenton, J, Taplin, S, Carney, P and others, ‘Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening Mammography’ (2007) 356(14) New England Journal of Medicine 1399–1409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrera, D and Woodward, M ‘Liability Issues Continue to Evolve in Computer-Assisted Surgery’ MDDI Online, 2020, www.mddionline.com/legal/liability-issues-continue-evolve-computer-assisted-surgery, accessed 9 June 2020.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration, ‘Computer-Assisted Surgical Systems’ 13 March 2019, www.fda.gov/medical-devices/surgery-devices/computer-assisted-surgical-systems, accessed 9 June 2020.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration, ‘Examples of Device Software Functions the FDA Regulates’ 26 September 2019, www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-software-functions-including-mobile-medical-applications/examples-device-software-functions-fda-regulates, accessed 9 June 2020.Google Scholar
Hay, P, Borchers, P, Symeonides, S and others, Conflict of Laws (West Academic 2018).Google Scholar
Health Resources & Services Administration, ‘Office for the Advancement of Telehealth’, www.hrsa.gov/rural-health/telehealth/, accessed 24 May 2021.Google Scholar
Heinze, C and Warmuth, C, ‘Das Sonderprozessrecht der Datenschutz-Grundverordnung’ (2016) 21 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess International 175–98.Google Scholar
Jakobs, I and Huber, F ‘Software als Medizinprodukt: Haftungs-und versicherungsrechtliche Aspekte’ (2019) 1 Zeitschrift Medizin Produkte Recht 1–6.Google Scholar
Kadner, Graziano Th ‘Torts’ in Basedow, J and others (eds), Encyclopedia of Private International Law II (Edward Elgar 2017) 1709–17.Google Scholar
Keysers, D, ‘Implantate – (Produkt-)Haftungsrechtliche Fragestellungen unter Berücksichtigung der Medical Device Regulation (Teil 2)’ (2020) 2 Haftpflicht International 54–61.Google Scholar
Kohler, C, ‘Conflict of Law Issues in the 2016 Data Protection Regulation of the European Union’ (2019) 3 Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale 653–75.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, K-F, Kriegmair, MC and Michel, M-C, ‘Kollaborative Automatisierung und Robotik’ (2019) 37(12) Reinprecht 925–27.Google Scholar
Lehman, C and others ‘Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection’ (2015) 175(11) JAMA Internal Medicine 1828.Google Scholar
Lüttringhaus, J, ‘Art. 1 Rome I Regulation’ in Ferrari, F (ed), Concise Commentary on the Rome I Regulation, 2nd ed (Cambridge University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Lüttringhaus, J, ‘Das internationale Datenprivatrecht: Baustein des Wirtschaftskollisionsrechts des 21. Jahrhunderts – Das IPR der Haftung für Verstöße gegen die EU-Datenschutzgrundverordnung’ (2018) 117(1) Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 50–82.Google Scholar
Marescaux, J, ‘Nom de code: ‘Opération Lindbergh‘ (2002) 127(1) Annals of Surgery 2–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Metz, C ‘India Fights Diabetic Blindness With Help From A.I.’ New York Times, 10 March 2019, www.nytimes.com/2019/03/10/technology/artificial-intelligence-eye-hospital-india.html, accessed 17 June 2020.Google Scholar
Middendorf, M and Wever, C, ‘Telemedicine to the Rescue? Reviewing the Current Liability Picture in Germany’ (2020) 4(2) Haftpflicht International 1–4.Google Scholar
De Miguel Asensio, P, ‘Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in the New EU General Data Protection Regulation’ (2017) 69(1) Revista Española de Derecho Internacional 75–108.Google Scholar
Ortner, R and Daubenbüchel, F‘Medizinprodukte 4.0 – Haftung, Datenschutz, IT-Sicherheit’ (2016) 41 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2918–24.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, M, ‘Europarechtliche Aspekte der Medizinprodukthaftung’ (2019) 3 Haftpflicht International 116.Google Scholar
Pormeister, K, ‘Genetic Research and Applicable Law: The Intra-EU Conflict of Laws as a Regulatory Challenge to Cross-Border Genetic Research’ (2018) 3 Journal of Law and the Biosciences 706–23.Google Scholar
Spickhoff, A, ‘Rechtsfragen der grenzüberschreitenden Telemedizin’ (2008) 36(8) Medizinrecht 535–43.Google Scholar
Wendelstein, C, Kollisionsrechtliche Probleme der Telemedizin (Mohr Siebeck 2012).Google Scholar
Wilderspin, M, ‘Consumer Contracts’ in Basedow, J, Rühl, G, Ferrari, F and others (eds), Encyclopedia of Private International Law I(Edward Elgar 2017) 464–72.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Armenakis, AA and Bedeian, AG, ‘Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s’ (1999) 25(3) Journal of Management 293–315. doi:10.1177/014920639902500303Google Scholar
Atun, R, ‘Transitioning Health Systems for Multimorbidity’ (2015) 386 Lancet 721.Google Scholar
Bacchi, S and others, ‘Machine Learning in the Prediction of Medical Inpatient Length of Stay’ (2020) 52(2) Journal of Internal Medicine 176–85. doi: 10.1111/imj.14962Google Scholar
Bansler, JP, ‘Challenges in User-Driven Optimization of EHR: A Case Study of a Large Epic Implementation in Denmark’ (2021) 148 International Journal of Medical Informatics 104394.Google Scholar
Beede, E and others, ‘A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy’ in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Association for Computing Machinery 2020) 1–12.Google Scholar
Benjamens, S, Dhunnoo, P and Mesko, B, ‘The State of Artificial Intelligence-Based FDA-Approved Medical Devices and Algorithms: An Online Database’ (2020) 3 npj Digital Medicine 118.Google Scholar
Bevan, G, ‘If Neither Altruism nor Markets Have Improved NHS Performance, What Might?’ (2010) 16 Eurohealth 20.Google Scholar
Bevan, G and Wilson, D, ‘Does “Naming and Shaming” Work for Schools and Hospitals? Lessons from Natural Experiments Following Devolution in England and Wales’ (2013) 33 Public Money & Management 245.Google Scholar
Bitterman, DS, Aerts, H and Mak, RH, ‘Approaching Autonomy in Medical Artificial Intelligence’ (2020) 2 Lancet Digital Health e447.Google Scholar
Boonstra, A, Versluis, A and Vos, JF, ‘Implementing Electronic Health Records in Hospitals: A Systematic Literature Review’ (2014) 14 BMC Health Services Research 370.Google Scholar
Braunstein, ML, ‘Healthcare in the Age of Interoperability: The Promise of Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources’ (2018) 9 IEEE Pulse 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brynjolfsson, E and Mcafee, A, ‘The Business of Artificial Intelligence’ (2017) 7 Harvard Business Review 3.Google Scholar
Bughin, J and others, Notes from the AI Frontier: Tackling Europe’s Gap in Digital and AI (McKinsey, 2019).Google Scholar
Buntin, MB and others, ‘The Benefits of Health Information Technology: A Review of the Recent Literature Shows Predominantly Positive Results’ (2011) 30 Health Affairs 464.Google Scholar
Cahan, EM and others, ‘Putting the Data Before the Algorithm in Big Data Addressing Personalized Healthcare’ (2019) 2 npj Digital Medicine 78.Google Scholar
Char, DS, Shah, NH and Magnus, D, ‘Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care – Addressing Ethical Challenges’ (2018) 378 New England Journal of Medicine 981.Google Scholar
Cresswell, K and Sheikh, A, ‘Organizational Issues in the Implementation and Adoption of Health Information Technology Innovations: An Interpretative Review’ (2013) 82 International Journal of Medical Informatics e73.Google Scholar
De Fauw, J and others, ‘Clinically Applicable Deep Learning for Diagnosis and Referral in Retinal Disease’ (2018) 24 Nature Medicine 1342.Google Scholar
Deidda, M, Lupiañez, F and Maghiros, I, ‘European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking Deployment of e-Health Services (2012–2013) – Methodological Report’ IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc, 2013, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC85854/jrc85854.pdfGoogle Scholar
De Nigris, S and others, ‘AI Watch AI Uptake in Health and Healthcare, 2020’ EUR 30478, Publications Office of the European Union, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2760/948860.Google Scholar
Doolin, B, ‘Implementing e-Health’ in Ferlie, E, Montgomery, K and Reff Pedersen, A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Health Care Management (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit, The Automation Readiness Index: Who Is Ready for the Coming Wave of Automation? (Economist Intelligence Unit, 2018).Google Scholar
Eit Health and McKinsey&Company, ‘Transforming Healthcare with AI’ (March 2020), https://eit.europa.eu/library/eit-health-mckinsey-transforming-healthcare-aiGoogle Scholar
Emanuel, EJ and others, ‘Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19’ (2020) 382 New England Journal of Medicine 2049.Google Scholar
Esteva, A and others, ‘Deep Learning-Enabled Medical Computer Vision’ (2021) 4 npj Digital Medicine 5.Google Scholar
Esteva, A and others, ‘Dermatologist-Level Classification of Skin Cancer with Deep Neural Networks’ (2017) 542 Nature 115.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Artificial Intelligence’ 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/artificial-intelligence, accessed 3 February 2021.Google Scholar
European Commission, Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (Publications Office 2019).Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: A European Approach to Excellence and Trust’ 19 February 2020, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence-feb2020_en.pdf, accessed 5 February 2022.Google Scholar
Foley, TJ and Vale, L, ‘What Role for Learning Health Systems in Quality Improvement within Healthcare Providers?’ (2017) 1 Learning Health Systems e10025.Google Scholar
Frey, CB and Osborne, MA, ‘The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?’ (2017) 114 Technological Forecasting and Social Change 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrety, K and others, ‘National Electronic Health Records and the Digital Disruption of Moral Orders’ (2014) 101 Social Science & Medicine 70.Google Scholar
Ghafur, S and others, ‘A Retrospective Impact Analysis of the WannaCry Cyberattack on the NHS’ (2019) 2 npj Digital Medicine 98.Google Scholar
Greco, S and others, ‘On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness’ (2019) 141 Social Indicators Research 61.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T and others, ‘Adoption, Non-adoption, and Abandonment of a Personal Electronic Health Record: Case Study of HealthSpace’ (2010) 341 BMJ c5814.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, T and others, ‘Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies’ (2017) 19 Journal of Medical Internet Research e367.Google Scholar
Grossman, C, Powers, B and McGinnis, JM, Digital Infrastructure for the Learning Health System: The Foundation for Continuous Improvement in Health and Health Care, workshop series summary (National Academies Press 2011).Google Scholar
Grupp, H and Mogee, ME, ‘Indicators for National Science and Technology Policy: How Robust Are Composite Indicators?’ (2004) 33 Research Policy 1373.Google Scholar
‘Health at a Glance: Europe 2018: State of Health in the EU Cycle | en | OECD’ (2020).Google Scholar
Harmon, SA and others, ‘Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of COVID-19 Pneumonia on Chest CT Using Multinational Datasets’ (2020) 11 Nature Communications 4080.Google Scholar
Hawkes, N, ‘NHS Data Sharing Deal with Google Prompts Concern’ (2016) 353 BMJ i2573.Google Scholar
He, J and others, ‘The Practical Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Medicine’ (2019) 25 Nature Medicine 30.Google Scholar
Hertzum, M and Ellingsen, G, ‘The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark’ (2019) 129 International Journal of Medical Informatics 312.Google Scholar
HIMSS, HIMSS Dictionary of Health Information Technology Terms, Acronyms, and Organizations 4th ed (CRC Press 2017).Google Scholar
HIMSS, ‘Interoperability in Healthcare’ 2020, www.himss.org/resources/interoperability-healthcare, accessed 3 February 2021.Google Scholar
HIMSS Analytics, ‘eHealth Trend Barometer: AI Use in European Healthcare’ 2019, www.himssanalytics.org/europe/ehealth-barometer/ehealth-trend-barometer-ai-use-european-healthcareGoogle Scholar
HIMSS Analytics, ‘Enabling Better Health Through Information and Technology’, www.lesiss.org/offres/file_inline_src/445/445_mailing_291018_111749_2.pdf, accessed 30 June 2020.Google Scholar
Hood, C, The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government, Course Book ed. (Princeton University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Iacobucci, G, ‘Patient Data Were Shared with Google on an “Inappropriate Legal Basis,” Says NHS Data Guardian’ (2017) 357 BMJ j2439.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office, ‘Royal Free – Google DeepMind Trial Failed to Comply with Data Protection Law’ 2017, https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/news-and-events/news-and-blogs/2017/07/royal-free-google-deepmind-trial-failed-to-comply-with-data-protection-law/, accessed 3 February 2021.Google Scholar
Jha, S and Topol, E, ‘Adapting to Artificial Intelligence: Radiologists and Pathologists as Information Specialists’ (2016) 316 JAMA 2353.Google Scholar
Karanikolos, M and others, ‘Financial Crisis, Austerity, and Health in Europe’ (2013) 381 Lancet 1323.Google Scholar
Kazley, AS and Ozcan, YA, ‘Organizational and Environmental Determinants of Hospital EMR Adoption: A National Study’ (2007) 31 Journal of Medical Systems 375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Komorowski, M and others, ‘The Artificial Intelligence Clinician Learns Optimal Treatment Strategies for Sepsis in Intensive Care’ (2018) 24 Nature Medicine 1716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovarik, CL, ‘Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence’ (2020) 156 JAMA Dermatology 493.Google Scholar
Krishnan, L, Ogunwole, SM and Cooper, LA, ‘Historical Insights on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the 1918 Influenza Pandemic, and Racial Disparities: Illuminating a Path Forward’ (2020) 173 Annals of Internal Medicine 474.Google Scholar
Kruse, CS and Beane, A, ‘Health Information Technology Continues to Show Positive Effect on Medical Outcomes: Systematic Review’ (2018) 20 Journal of Medical Internet Research e41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kujala, S and others, ‘The Role of Frontline Leaders in Building Health Professional Support for a New Patient Portal: Survey Study’ (2019) 21 Journal of Medical Internet Research e11413.Google Scholar
Legg, S and Hutter, M, ‘A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence’ (2007) 157 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 17.Google Scholar
Limb, M, ‘Controversial Database of Medical Records is Scrapped over Security Concerns’ (2016) 354 BMJ i3804.Google Scholar
Lokuge, S and others, ‘Organizational Readiness for Digital Innovation: Development and Empirical Calibration of a Construct’ (2019) 56 Information and Management 445.Google Scholar
Malin, JL, ‘Envisioning Watson as a Rapid-Learning System for Oncology’ (2013) 9 Journal of Oncology Practice 155.Google Scholar
Manz, CR and others, ‘Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict 180-Day Mortality for Outpatients with Cancer’ (2020) 6(11) JAMA Oncology 1723–30.Google Scholar
McCall, B, ‘COVID-19 and Artificial Intelligence: Protecting Health-Care Workers and Curbing the Spread’ (2020) 2 Lancet Digital Health e166.Google Scholar
Miech, EJ and others, ‘Inside Help: An Integrative Review of Champions in Healthcare-Related Implementation’ (2018) 6 SAGE Open Medicine 2050312118773261.Google Scholar
Mileti, D, Gillespie, D and Haas, J, ‘Size and Structure in Complex Organizations’ (1977) 56 Social Forces 208.Google Scholar
Minor, L, ‘The Rise of the Data-Driven Physician’ Stanford Medicine 2020 Health Trends Report, https://med.stanford.edu/dean/healthtrends.html, accessed 6 February 2022.Google Scholar
Muse, ED and others, ‘Towards a Smart Medical Home’ (2017) 389 Lancet 358.Google Scholar
Nagendran, M and others, ‘Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinicians: Systematic Review of Design, Reporting Standards, and Claims of Deep Learning Studies’ (2020) 368 BMJ m689.Google ScholarPubMed
Nelson, A and others, ‘Predicting Scheduled Hospital Attendance with Artificial Intelligence’ (2019) 2 npj Digital Medicine 26.Google Scholar
Obermeyer, Z and Lee, TH, ‘Lost in Thought – The Limits of the Human Mind and the Future of Medicine’ (2017) 377 New England Journal of Medicine 1209.Google Scholar
OECD, ‘AI Strategies & Public Sector Components – Observatory of Public Sector Innovation’ 2021, https://oecd-opsi.org/projects/ai/strategies/, accessed 3 February 2021.Google Scholar
OECD, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide (OECD Publishing 2008).Google Scholar
OECD, Health at a Glance: Europe 2016: State of Health in the EU Cycle (OECD 2016).Google Scholar
OECD and European Union, Health at a Glance: Europe 2020 (OECD Publishing 2020).Google Scholar
Oxford Insights, ‘Government AI Readiness Index 2020’ 2020, www.oxfordinsights.com/government-ai-readiness-index-2020, accessed 3 February 2021.Google Scholar
Panch, T, Szolovits, P and Atun, R, ‘Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Health Systems’ (2018) 8 Journal of Global Health 020303.Google Scholar
Paré, G and others, ‘Clinicians’ Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change in the Context of Clinical Information System Projects: Insights from Two Cross-Sectional Surveys’ (2011) 6 Implementation Science 15.Google Scholar
Patel, TA and others, ‘Correlating Mammographic and Pathologic Findings in Clinical Decision Support Using Natural Language Processing and Data Mining Methods’ (2017) 123 Cancer 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrault, R and others, Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2019 (Human-Centered AI Institute, Stanford University 2019).Google Scholar
Petkus, H, Hoogewerf, J and Wyatt, JC, ‘What Do Senior Physicians Think about AI and Clinical Decision Support Systems: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Data from Specialty Societies’ (2020) 20 Clinical Medicine 324.Google Scholar
Pettit, L, ‘Understanding EMRAM and How It Can be Used by Policy-Makers, Hospital CIOs and Their IT Teams’ (2013) 49 World Hospitals and Health Services 7.Google Scholar
Piwek, L and others, ‘The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers’ (2016) 13 PLoS Medicine e1001953.Google Scholar
Powles, J and Hodson, H, ‘Google DeepMind and Healthcare in an Age of Algorithms’ (2017) 7 Health Technology 351.Google Scholar
PwC, European Hospital Survey: Benchmarking Deployment of eHealth Services (2012–2013), final report (JCR Scientific and Policy, 2014).Google Scholar
Rajkomar, A and others, ‘Scalable and Accurate Deep Learning with Electronic Health Records’ (2018) 1 npj Digital Medicine 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawson, TM and others, ‘Artificial Intelligence Can Improve Decision-Making in Infection Management’ (2019) 3 Nature Human Behaviour 543.Google Scholar
Rossi, F, Artificial Intelligence: Potential Benefits and Ethical Considerations (2016) Briefing Paper to the European Union Parliament Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/571380/IPOL_BRI(2016)571380_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, A, The Case for 21st Century Learning, Vol. 282 (OECD Observer 2011), www.oecd.org/general/thecasefor21st-centurylearning.htmGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, C, ‘MD Anderson Breaks with IBM Watson, Raising Questions about Artificial Intelligence in Oncology’ (2017) 109 JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx113Google Scholar
Sharpe, A, Literature Review of Frameworks for Macro-Indicators (Centre for the Study of Living Standards 2004).Google Scholar
Shaw, J and others, ‘Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge’ (2019) 21 Journal of Medical Internet Research e13659.Google Scholar
Shortliffe, EH and Sepulveda, MJ, ‘Clinical Decision Support in the Era of Artificial Intelligence’ (2018) 320 JAMA 2199.Google Scholar
Singer, JD and Braun, HI, ‘Testing International Education Assessments’ (2018) 360 Science 38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Somashekhar, SP and others, ‘Watson for Oncology and Breast Cancer Treatment Recommendations: Agreement with an Expert Multidisciplinary Tumor Board’ (2018) 29 Annals of Oncology 418.Google Scholar
Southon, FC, Sauer, C and Grant, CN, ‘Information Technology in Complex Health Services: Organizational Impediments to Successful Technology Transfer and Diffusion’ (1997) 4 Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 112.Google Scholar
Stephani, V, Busse, R and Geissler, A, ‘Benchmarking der Krankenhaus-IT: Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich’ in Klauber, J and others (eds), Krankenhaus-Report 2019: Das digitale Krankenhaus (Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019).Google Scholar
Strickland, E, ‘IBM Watson, Heal Thyself: How IBM Overpromised and Underdelivered on AI Health Care’ (2019) 56 IEEE Spectrum 24.Google Scholar
Thiel, R and others, #SmartHealthSystems – Focus Europe (Bertelsmann Stiftung 2019).Google Scholar
Thunea, T and Mina, A, ‘Hospitals as Innovators in the Health-Care System: A Literature Review and Research Agenda’ (2016) 45 Research Policy 1545.Google Scholar
Ting, DSW and others, ‘Digital Technology and COVID-19’ (2020) 26 Nature Medicine 459.Google Scholar
Topol, EJ, ‘High-Performance Medicine: The Convergence of Human and Artificial Intelligence’ (2019) 25 Nature Medicine 44.Google Scholar
van Limburg, M and others, ‘Why Business Modeling is Crucial in the Development of eHealth Technologies’ (2011) 13 Journal of Medical Internet Research e124.Google Scholar
van Staa, TP and others, ‘Big Health Data: The Need to Earn Public Trust’ (2016) 354 BMJ i3636.Google Scholar
Vayena, E, Blasimme, A and Cohen, IG, ‘Machine Learning in Medicine: Addressing Ethical Challenges’ (2018) 15 PLoS Medicine e1002689.Google Scholar
Wachter, R, Making IT Work: Harnessing the Power of Health Information Technology to Improve Care in England (Department of Health, 2016).Google Scholar
Wadmann, S and Hoeyer, K, ‘Dangers of the Digital Fit: Rethinking Seamlessness and Social Sustainability in Data-Intensive Healthcare’ (2018) 5 Big Data & Society 2053951717752964.Google Scholar
Weng, SF and others, ‘Can Machine-Learning Improve Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Using Routine Clinical Data?’ (2017) 12 PLoS One e0174944.Google Scholar
Wind, A and van Harten, WH, ‘Benchmarking Specialty Hospitals, A Scoping Review on Theory and Practice’ (2017) 17 BMC Health Services Research 245.Google Scholar
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, ‘Core Health Indicators in the WHO European Region 2019. Special focus: Health 2020’ 2019, www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/413239/CHI_2019_EN_WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar
Yusif, S, Hafeez-Baig, A and Soar, J, ‘e-Health Readiness Assessment Factors and Measuring Tools: A Systematic Review’ (2017) 107 International Journal of Medical Informatics 56.Google Scholar
Zeevi, D and others, ‘Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses’ (2015) 163 Cell 1079.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y and others, ‘Artificial Intelligence in COVID-19 Drug Repurposing’ (2020) 2 Lancet Digital Health e667.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Albrecht, U-V (ed), Chances and Risks of Mobile Health Apps (Charisma) (Hannover Medical School 2016).Google Scholar
Andorno, R, ‘The Right Not to Know – An Autonomy-Based Approach’ (2004) 30(5) Journal of Medical Ethics 435–39.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T and Childress, J, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed. (Oxford University Press 2001).Google Scholar
Cate, FH and others, Data Protection Principles for the 21st Century (Maurer Faculty Report 2013).Google Scholar
Chen, JH ‘Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine – Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations’ (2017) 376(26) New England Journal of Medicine 2507–25.Google Scholar
Cole, C and others, ‘“Ethical Responsibility” or “A Whole Can of Worms”: Differences in Opinion on Incidental Finding Review and Disclosure in Neuroimaging Research from Focus Group Discussions with Participants, Parents, IRB Members, Investigators, Physicians and Community Members’ (2015) 41(10) Journal of Medical Ethics 841–47.Google Scholar
Dahi, A and others, ‘Using Patient Avatars to Promote Health Data Sharing Applications: Perspectives and Regulatory Challenges’ (2016) 23(2) European Journal of Health Law 175–94.Google Scholar
Duncan, RE, ‘Predictive Genetic Testing in Young People: When Is It Appropriate?’ (2004) 40(11) Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 593–95.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge University Press 1988).Google Scholar
Epstein, RM and others, ‘Withholding Information from Patients – When Less Is More’ (2010) 362(5) The New England Journal of Medicine 380–81.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Green Paper on Mobile Health (“mHealth”)’ COM(2014) 219 final, 2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/LSU/?uri=celex:52014DC0219Google Scholar
Fry, H, Hello World (Norton 2018).Google Scholar
Gammon, BL and others, ‘Decisional Regret in Women Receiving High Risk or Inconclusive Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Results’ (2020) 33(8) Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 1412–18.Google Scholar
Gilbar, R, ‘Communicating Genetic Information in the Family: The Familial Relationship as the Forgotten Factor’ (2007) 33(7) Journal of Medical Ethics 390–93.Google Scholar
Godard, B and others, ‘Guidelines for Disclosing Genetic Information to Family Members: From Development to Use’ (2006) 5(2) Familial Cancer 103–16.Google Scholar
Laurie, G, ‘In Defence of Ignorance: Genetic Information and the Right not to Know’ (1999) 6(2) European Journal of Health Law 119–32.Google Scholar
Laurie, G, ‘Recognizing the Right Not to Know: Conceptual, Professional, and Legal Implications’ (2014) 42(1) The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 53–63.Google Scholar
Mackie, JL, The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation (Clarendon Press 1980).Google Scholar
Mayer-Schönberger, V and Cukier, K, Big Data (John Murray 2013).Google Scholar
Mill, JS, A System of Logic (John W Parker 1843).Google Scholar
Provost, F and Fawcett, T, Data Science for Business (O’Reilly Media 2013).Google Scholar
Stauch, M, ‘Causation, Risk, and Loss of Chance in Medical Negligence’ (1997) 17(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 205–26.Google Scholar
Teff, H, Causing Psychiatric and Emotional Harm (Hart 2009).Google Scholar
Thorogood, A and others, ‘An Implementation Framework for the Feedback of Individual Research Results and Incidental Findings in Research’ (2014) 15(1) BMC Medical Ethics 1–13.Google Scholar
Wright, RW, ‘Causation in Tort Law’ (1985) 73(6) California Law Review 1735–1828.Google Scholar

Bibliography

23andMe, ‘Privacy Highlights’, www.23andme.com/en-eu/about/privacy/, accessed 19 July 2020. Ancestry, ‘Ancestry Transparency Report’ version 10, July 2020, www.ancestry.com/cs/transparency, accessed 13 July.Google Scholar
Ancestry, ‘Your Privacy’, www.ancestry.com/cs/legal/privacystatement, accessed 19 July 2020.Google Scholar
Article 29 Working Party, ‘Opinion 4/2007 on the Concept of Personal Data Adopted on 20th June’ (WP 136), https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2007/wp136_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Article 29 Working Party, ‘Opinion on Some Key Issues of the Law Enforcement Directive’ (EU 2016/680), Adopted on 29 November 2017 (WP 258), https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/610178Google Scholar
Bates, M, ‘Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: Is the Public Ready for Simple, At-Home DNA Tests to Detect Disease Risk?’ (2018) 9(6) IEEE Pulse Pulse, IEEE 11–14.Google Scholar
Brantemo, A, ‘Linköpings Trauma: Dubbelmördaren höll sig undan i 16 år’ SVT nyheter, 1 October 2020, www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/ost/linkopings-trauma-daniel-nyqvist-gackade-polisen-i-16-ar, accessed 26 June 2021.Google Scholar
Dockser, AM, ‘Customers Handed Over Their DNA. The Company Let the FBI Take a Look’ Wall Street Journal, 22 August 2019, www.wsj.com/articles/customers-handed-over-their-dna-the-company-let-the-fbi-take-a-look-11566491162, accessed 25 July 2020.Google Scholar
Dove, ES and Chen, J, ‘What Does It Mean for a Data Subject to Make Their Personal Data “Manifestly Public?” An Analysis of GDPR Article 9(2)(e)’ (2021) 11(2) International Data Privacy Law ipab005, https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipab005.Google Scholar
Eriksson, B and Snaprud, P, ‘Dna-tekniken som löser dubbelmordet i Linköping’ SVT Nyheter, 9 June 2020, www.svt.se/nyheter/vetenskap/dna-tekniken-som-kan-losa-dubbelmordet-i-linkoping, accessed 21 June 2020.Google Scholar
Esch-Leonhardt and Others v. ECB, T-320/02.Google Scholar
European Commission, ‘Data Protection’, Special Eurobarometer 431, June 2015, https://doi.org/10.2838/552336.Google Scholar
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and Council of Europe, Handbook on European Data Protection Law (2018), the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and Council of Europe, Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
FamilyTreeDNA, ‘FamilyTreeDNA Privacy Statement’, www.familytreedna.com/legal/privacy-statement, accessed 19 July 2020.Google Scholar
Feltzmann, H, ‘“Just a Bit of Fun”: How Recreational is Direct-to-Customer Genetic Testing?’ (2015) 21(1) The New Bioethics 20–32, https://doi.org/10.1179/2050287715Z.00000000062.Google Scholar
Guest, C, ‘DNA and Law Enforcement: How the Use of Open-Source DNA Databases Violates Privacy Rights’ (2019) 68 (3) American University Law Review 1015–52.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office, ‘Special Categories of Personal Data, What Are the Conditions for Processing?’, https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/special-category-data/what-are-the-conditions-for-processing/#conditions5, accessed 25 June 2021.Google Scholar
Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten, ‘Förhandssamråd enligt brottsdatalagen; användning av dna-baserade släktforskningsdatabaser’, reference number: DI-2021-1521.Google Scholar
Kalokairinou, L and others, ‘Legislation of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in Europe: A Fragmented Regulatory Landscape’ (2018) 9(2) Journal of Community Genetics 117–32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0344-2.Google Scholar
Kennett, D, ‘Using Genetic Genealogy Databases in Missing Persons Cases and to Develop Suspect Leads in Violent Crimes’ (2019) 301 Forensic Science International 107–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.016.Google Scholar
Kolata, G and Murphy, H, ‘The Golden State Killer is Tracked Through a Thicket of DNA, and Experts Shudder’ The New York Times, 27 April 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/04/27/health/dna-privacy-golden-state-killer-genealogy.html, accessed 21 June 2020.Google Scholar
Mahmoud-Davis, SA, ‘Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Empowering EU Consumers and Giving Meaning to the Informed Consent Process within the IVDR and GDPR Frameworks’ (2020) 19(1) Washington University Global Studies Law Review 1–52.Google Scholar
Marinova, P, ‘Ancestry CEO on Genetic Data Privacy: Consumers Need to Think About Who They Do Business With’ Fortune, 16 July 2019, https://fortune.com/2019/07/15/dna-testing-privacy-ancestry/, accessed 13 July 2020.Google Scholar
Maximillian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner C–362/14.Google Scholar
MyHeritage, ‘MyHeritage sekretesspolicy’, www.myheritage.com/privacy-policy?lang=SV, accessed 19 July 2020.Google Scholar
Nationellt Forensiskt Centrum, ‘DNA och biologi, faktablad – DNA-undersökning’, https://nfc.polisen.se/kriminalteknik/dna-och-biologi/, accessed 25 July 2020.Google Scholar
Nationellt Forensiskt Centrum, ‘Pilot: Dna-spår och släktforskning, användning av släktforskningsdatabaser I brottsutredande syfte’, reference number: A544.825/2020, https://polisen.se/aktuellt/nyheter/2020/november/dna-baserad-slaktforskning-kan-bli-nationellt-anvand-metod/Google Scholar
Polismyndigheten, ‘Begäran om förhandssamråd – Dna-spår och släktforskning för brottsutredande ändamål’, reference number: A071.932/2021.Google Scholar
Polismyndigheten, ‘Rättsutredning: Dna-spår och släktforskning’, reference number: A637.388/2018.Google Scholar
Swedish Government Bill, 2017/18:269, Criminal Data Act – complementary legislation (Sw. Brottsdatalagen – kompletterande lagstiftning), www.regeringen.se/49dff7/contentassets/560221d124cb46bda169c3e8f0eef2c5/prop-201718-269.pdfGoogle Scholar
TT, ‘Regeringen ska utreda släktforskningsmetoden’ Dagens Nyheter, 12 May 2021, www.dn.se31verigee/regeringen-ska-utreda-slaktforskningsmetoden/, accessed 26 June 2021.Google Scholar
Yaniv, E and others, ‘Identity Inference of Genomic Data Using Long-Range Familial Searches’ (2018) 362(6415) Science 690–94, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau4832Google Scholar
Zhang, S, ‘How a Genealogy Website Led to the Alleged Golden State Killer’ The Atlantic, 27 April 2018, www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/golden-state-killer-east-area-rapist-dna-genealogy/559070/, accessed 12 June 2021.Google Scholar
Zhang, S, ‘How a Tiny Website Became the Police’s Go-To Genealogy Database’ The Atlantic, 1 June 2018, www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/06/gedmatch-police-genealogy-database/561695/, accessed 25 July 2020.Google Scholar

Bibliography

Academy of Medical Sciences, Exploring a New Social Contract for Medical Innovation (Academy of Medical Sciences 2015).Google Scholar
Aitken, M, Porteous, C and others, ‘Who Benefits and How? Public Expectations of Public Benefits from Data-Intensive Health Research’ (2018) 5 Big Data & Society 112.Google Scholar
Aitken, M, Porteous, C and Tully, M and others, ‘Consensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data Intensive Health Research’ (2019) 4 International Journal of Population Data Science 6.Google Scholar
Allen, J, Adams, C and Flack, F, ‘The Role of Data Custodians in Establishing and Maintaining Social License for Health Research’ (2019) Bioethics Online.Google Scholar
Barua, B, Hasan, H and Timmermans, I, Comparing Performance of Universal Health Care Countries, 2017 (Fraser Institute 2017).Google Scholar
Bennett, C, Parsons, C and Molnar, A, ‘Forgetting, Non-Forgetting and Quasi Forgetting in Social Networking: Canadian Policy and Corporate Practice’ in Gutwirth, S, Leenes, R and De Hert, P (eds), Reloading Data Protection: Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges (Springer 2014) 41.Google Scholar
Brownsword, R, ‘The Cult of Consent: Fixation and Fallacy’ (2004) 15 King’s Law Journal 223.Google Scholar
Callahan, E, Hazarian, S and others, ‘Eliminating LGBTIQQ Health Disparities: The Associated Roles of Electronic Health Records and Institutional Culture’ (2014) 44 Hastings Center Report S48.Google Scholar
Carter, P, Laurie, G and Dixon-Woods, M, ‘The Social License for Research: Why Care.Data Ran into Trouble’ (2015) 41 Journal of Medical Ethics 404.Google Scholar
Cate, F, Cullen, P and Mayer-Schönberger, V, ‘Data Protection Principles for the 21st Century: Revising the 1980 OECD Guidelines’ 2014, www.oii.ox.ac.uk/archive/downloads/publications/Data_Protection_Principles_for_the_21st_Century.pdf, accessed 28 July 2021.Google Scholar
Cohen, I, ‘Is There a Duty to Share Healthcare Data?’ in Cohen, I, Fernandez Lynch, H and others (eds), Big Data, Health Law and Bioethics (Cambridge University Press 2018) 209–22.Google Scholar
Cohen, J, ‘Examined Lives: Informational Privacy and the Subject as Object’ (2000) 52 Stanford Law Review 1373.Google Scholar
Colbert, Y, ‘More Than 2,500 Privacy Breaches at NS Health Authority in Recent Years, Report Says’ CBC News, 22 May 2019, www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/privacy-breaches-nsha-privacy-comissioner-1.5138360?cmp=rss, accessed 28 July 2021.Google Scholar
Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada (Queen’s Printer 2002).Google Scholar
Contreras, J, ‘Genetic Property’ (2016) 105 The Georgetown Law Journal 1.Google Scholar
Contreras, J and Nordfalk, F, ‘Liability (and) Rules for Health Information’ (2019) 29 Health Matrix 1.Google Scholar
Council of Canadian Academies, Honesty, Accountability and Trust: Fostering Research Integrity in Canada (Council of Canadian Academies 2010).Google Scholar
Crawford, K and Calo, R, ‘There Is a Blind Spot in AI Research’ (2016) 538 Nature News 311.Google Scholar
Dixon-Woods, M and Ashcroft, R, ‘Regulation and the Social Licence for Medical Research’ (2008) 11 Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 381.Google Scholar
Dove, E and Garattini, C, ‘Expert Perspectives on Ethics Review of International Data-Intensive Research: Working Towards Mutual Recognition’ (2018) 14 Research Ethics 1.Google Scholar
Egan, R, Stockley, D and others, ‘Research Ethics Board (REB) Members’ Preparation for, and Perceived Knowledge of Research Ethics’ (2016) 14 Journal of Academic Ethics 191.Google Scholar
EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (2019), https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai, accessed 28 July 2021.Google Scholar
Evans, B, ‘Barbarians at the Gate: Consumer-Driven Health Data Commons and the Transformation of Citizen Science’ (2016) 42 American Journal of Law & Medicine 651.Google Scholar
First Nations Information Governance Centre, Ownership, Control, Access and Possession (OCAP™): The Path to First Nations Information Governance (2014).Google Scholar
Ford, E, Boyd, A and others, ‘Our Data, Our Society, Our Health: A Vision for Inclusive and Transparent Health Data Science in the UK and Beyond’ (2019) 3 Learn Health Systems 10191.Google Scholar
Gough, C, Cunningham, R and Mander, S, ‘Understanding Key Elements in Establishing a Social License for CCS: An Empirical Approach’ (2018) 68 The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 16.Google Scholar
Hall, M, ‘Property, Privacy and the Pursuit of Interconnected Electronic Health Records’ (2010) 95 Iowa Law Review 631.Google Scholar
Hall, M, and Schulman, K, ‘Ownership of Medical Information’ (2009) 301 JAMA 1282.Google Scholar
Harmon, S, ‘Semantic, Pedantic or Paradigm Shift? Recruitment, Retention and Property in Modern Population Biobanking’ (2008) 16 European Journal of Health Law 27.Google Scholar
Harmon, S, ‘Solidarity: A (New) Ethic for Global Health Policy’ (2006) 14 Health Care Analysis 215.Google Scholar
Harmon, S and McMahon, A, ‘Banking (on) the Brain: From Consent to Authorisation and the Transformative Potential of Solidarity’ (2014) 22 Medical Law Review 572.Google Scholar
Heitmueller, A, Henderson, S and others, ‘Developing Public Policy to Advance the Use of Big Data in Health Care’ (2014) 33 Health Affairs 1523.Google Scholar
Henriksen-Bulmer, J and Jeary, S, ‘Re-Identification Attacks – A Systematic Literature Review’ (2016) 36 The International Journal of Information Management 1184.Google Scholar
Herder, M, ‘When Everyone Is an Orphan: Against Adopting a U.S.-Styled Orphan Drug Policy in Canada’ (2013) 20 Responsibility in Research 227.Google Scholar
Howe, N, Giles, E and others, ‘Systematic Review of Participants’ Attitudes Towards Data Sharing: A Thematic Synthesis’ (2018) 23 Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 123.Google Scholar
Kaplan, B, ‘How Should Health Data Be Used?’ (2016) 25 Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 312.Google Scholar
Kass, N, ‘The Research-Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight’ (2013) 43 Hastings Center Reports S4.Google Scholar
King, M, ‘An Overall Approach to Health Care for Indigenous Peoples’ (2009) 56 Pediatric Clinics 1239.Google Scholar
Knoppers, B, Dove, E and others, ‘A Human Rights Approach to an International Code of Conduct for Genomic and Clinical Data Sharing’ (2014) 133 Human Genetics 895.Google Scholar
Kotecha, J, Manca, D, and others, ‘Ethics and Privacy Issues of a Practice-based Surveillance System: Need for a National-level Institutional Research Ethics Board and Consent Standards’ (2011) 57 Canadian Family Physician 1165.Google Scholar
Kukutai, T and Taylor, J (eds), Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda (ANU Press 2016).Google Scholar
McLeod, C and Sherwin, S, ‘Relational Autonomy, Self-Trust, and Health Care for Patients Who Are Oppressed’ (2000) 345 Philosophy Publications 259.Google Scholar
Mayer-Schonberger, V, Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age (Princeton University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Mayor, F, ‘Preface’ in Proceedings of the First Session of the IBC (UNESCO 1994).Google Scholar
Moffat, K, Lacey, J and others, ‘The Social License to Operate: A Critical Review’ (2016) 89 Forestry 477.Google Scholar
Morley, J and Floridi, L, ‘NHS AI Lab: Why We Need to Be Ethically Mindful About AI for Healthcare’ (2019) SSRN 3445421, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3445421.Google Scholar
NHS Digital, Data Insights and Statistics: Information and Technology for Better Health and Care (2018).Google Scholar
OECD, Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data (2013), www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/privacy.htm, accessed 28 July 2021Google Scholar
Page, S and Nyeboer, J, ‘Improving the Process of Research Ethics Review’ (2017) 2 Research Integrity and Peer Review 14.Google Scholar
Panel on Research Ethics, ‘TCPS2 Tutorial Course on Research Ethics (CORE)’, www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/education/tutorial-didacticiel/, accessed 28 July 2021.Google Scholar
Paul, C, Sanson-Fisher, R and others, ‘Being Sorry Is Not Enough: The Sorry State of the Evidence Base for Improving the Health of Indigenous Populations’ (2010) 38 American Journal of Preventive Medicine 566.Google Scholar
PCC, ‘Appearance Before the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI) Before the International Grand Committee on Big Data, Privacy and Democracy’, 28 May 2019, www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-actions-and-decisions/advice-to-parliament/2019/parl_20190528/, accessed 28 July 2021.Google Scholar
PCC, ‘Guidance on Inappropriate Data Practices: Interpretation and Application of s 5(3) PIPEDA’ 2018, www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/collecting-personal-information/consent/gd_53_201805/, accessed 28 July 2021.Google Scholar
Price, W, ‘Black-Box Medicine’ (2016) 28 The Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 419.Google Scholar
Price, W and Cohen, I, ‘Privacy in the Age of Medical Big Data’ (2019) 25 Nature Medicine 37.Google Scholar
Purtova, N, ‘Do Property Rights in Personal Data Make Sense After the Big Data Turn?’ (2017) 10 Journal of Law & Economic Regulation 208.Google Scholar
Radin, M, ‘Market-Inalienability’ (1987) 100 Harvard Law Review 1849.Google Scholar
Ramon, S and Mohr, A, ‘A Social License for Science: Capturing the Public of Co-Constructing Research?’ (2014) 28 Social Epistemology 258.Google Scholar
Reading, J and Nowgesic, E, ‘Improving the Health of Future Generations: The Canadian Institutes of Health Research Institute of Aboriginal Peoples’ Health’ (2002) 92 American Journal of Public Health 1396Google Scholar
Roberts, J, ‘Progressive Genetic Ownership’ (2018) 93 Notre Dame Law Review 1105.Google Scholar
Rodwin, M, ‘The Case for Public Ownership of Patient Data’ (2009) 302 JAMA 86.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M, ‘Ethical Issues in Big Data Health Research’ (2015) 43 Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 425.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: Gathering Strength (1997).Google Scholar
Rumbold, J and Pierscionek, B, ‘Why Patients Shouldn’t “Own” Their Medical Records’ (2016) 34 Nature Biotechnology 586.Google Scholar
Scassa, T, ‘As Our Economy Becomes More Data Driven, Canadians Need a National Data Strategy that Encourages Innovation and Provides Security and Privacy’, Policy Options, 15 January 2019.Google Scholar
Schwartz, P, ‘Property, Privacy, and Personal Data’ (2004) 117 Harvard Law Review 2056.Google Scholar
Skopek, J, ‘Big Data’s Epistemology and Its Implications for Precision Medicine and Privacy’ in Cohen, I, Fernandez Lynch, H and others (eds), Big Data, Health Law and Bioethics (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Spector-Bagdady, K, DeVries, R and others, ‘Encouraging Participation and Transparency in Biobank Research’ (2018) 37 Health Affairs 1313.Google Scholar
Stahl, B and Wright, D, ‘Ethics and Privacy in AI and Big Data: Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation’ (2018) 16 IEEE Security and Privacy 26.Google Scholar
Terry, N, ‘Protecting Patient Privacy in the Age of Big Data’ (2012) 81 UMKC Law Review 385.Google Scholar
Thaler, R, ‘Show Us the Data (It’s Ours, After All)’ New York Times, 23 April 2011, www.nytimes.com/2011/04/24/business/24view.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rssGoogle Scholar
Townend, D, ‘Conclusion: Harmonisation in Genomic and Health Data Sharing for Research: An Impossible Dream?’ (2018) 137 Human Genetics 657.Google Scholar
Townend, D, ‘Privacy, Politeness and the Boundary Between Theory and Practice in Ethical Rationalism’ in Capps, P and Pattinson, S (eds), Ethical Rationalism and the Law (Hart Publishing 2017) 171–90.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.