Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-846f6c7c4f-k2x4h Total loading time: 0.714 Render date: 2022-07-07T09:05:54.363Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Chapter 6 - A Conspectus on the Status of Tepecik-Çiftlik Excavation (Cappadocia)

Intersite and Regional Outcomes and Prospects

from Part II - Anatolia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2022

Peter F. Biehl
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Eva Rosenstock
Affiliation:
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Get access

Summary

Tepecik-Çiftlik, until now the only tell site excavated in volcanic Cappadocia, was occupied between the beginning of the 8th to the middle of 6th millennium and provides a profound amount of data for the Neolithic and early Chalcolithic periods. Rich and diverse environmental conditions allowed groups in this region to establish flourishing societies. Due to its location close to the Göllüdağ obsidian sources, the site seems to have played an important role in controlling the sources through production and exchange of raw materials and tools. These activities caused the appearance of extroverted and communicative societies, who had interests in and ties to distant territories, to “other worlds,” eventually culminating in a migration of parts of the society to territories situated in the north. To find out what was encouraging this migration, further research in volcanic Cappadocia will be crucial.

Type
Chapter
Information
6000 BC
Transformation and Change in the Near East and Europe
, pp. 83 - 103
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ataman, Kathryn 1988 The Chipped Stone Assemblage from Can Hasan III: A Study in Typology, Technology and Function. Institute of Archaeology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University College, London.Google Scholar
Balkan-Atlı, Nur and Binder, Didier 2001 Les ateliers de taille d’obsidienne: fouilles de Kömürcü-Kaletepe 2000. Anatolia Antiqua 9:193205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkan-Atlı, Nur, Binder, Didier and Kuzucuoğlu, Catherine 1999 L’atelier néolithique de Kömürcü-Kaletepe: fouilles de 1998. Anatolia Antiqua 7:231243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkan-Atlı, Nur, Kuhn, Steven, Astruc, Laurence, et al. 2008 Göllü Dağ 2007 Survey. Anatolia Antiqua 16:293312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkan-Atlı, Nur, Kuhn, Steven, Astruc, Laurence, et al. 2009 Göllü Dağ 2008 Survey. Anatolia Antiqua 17:301315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkan-Atlı, Nur, Kuhn, Steven, Astruc, Laurence, et al. 2010 Göllü Dağ Survey 2009. Anatolia Antiqua 18:191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkan-Atlı, Nur, Kuhn, Steven, Astruc, Laurence, et al. 2011 Göllüdağ Survey 2010. Anatolia Antiqua 19:259278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bıçakçı, Erhan 2001 Tepecik-Çiftlik Höyüğü (Niğde) kazısı ışığında orta Anadolu tarihöncesi kültürleri ile ilgili yeni bir değerlendirme. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 4:2541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bıçakçı, Erhan 2003 Tepecik-Çiftlik: un nouveau site en Anatolie centrale. Dossiers de l’Archéologie 281:4247.Google Scholar
Bıçakçı, Erhan, Algül, Çiler Altınbilek, Balcı, Semra and Godon, Martin 2007 Tepecik-Çiftlik. In Türkiye’de Neolitik Dönem: Anadolu’da uygarlığın doğuşu ve Avrupa’ya yayılımı. yeni kazılar, yeni bulgular, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet and Başgelen, Nezih, pp. 237253. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Bıçakçı, Erhan, Godon, Martin and Çakan, Yasın G. 2012 Tepecik-Çiftlik. In The Neolithic in Turkey, New Excavations and New Research. Volume 3: Central Turkey, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet, Başgelen, Nezih and Kuniholm, Peter, pp. 89134. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Binder, Didier 2002 Stones Making Sense: What Obsidian Could Tell about the Origins of the Central Anatolian Neolithic. In The Neolithic of Central Anatolia: Internal Developments and External Relations during the 9th–6th Millennia cal B.C., edited by Gérard, F., Thissen, L., pp. 7990. Ege Yayınları, İstanbul.Google Scholar
Binder, Didier 2007 PPN Pressure Technology: Views from Anatolia. La diversité des systèmes techniques des communautés du Néolithique pré-céramique, pp. 239247. Éditions APDCA, Antibes.Google Scholar
Büyükkarakaya, Ali Metin, Çakan, Yasin Gökhan, Godon, Martin, Erdal, Yılmaz Selim and Bıçakçı, Erhan in prep. Handling Dead Bodies: Investigating the Formation Process of a Collective Burial from Neolithic Tepecik-Çiftlik, Central Anatolia (Turkey).Google Scholar
Campana, Douglas V., and Crabtree, Pam J. 2018 Bone Implements from Chalcolithic Tepecik-Çiftlik: Traces of Manufacture and Wear on Two Classes of Bone Objects Recovered from the 2013 Excavation Season. Quarternary International 472/2018:7583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cauvin, Marie-Claire and Balkan-Atlı, Nur 1996 Rapport sur les recherches sur l’obsidienne en Cappadoce 1993–1995. Anatolia Antiqua 4:249271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Harold R. 1970 The Palaeoecology of South Central Anatolia. Anatolian Studies 20:119137.Google Scholar
Crabtree, Pam. 2015 Chalcolithic Animal Bones from Tepecik-Çiftlik: Faunal Remains Recovered from the 2013 Season. Unpublished excavation report.Google Scholar
Çakan, Yasin Gökhan 2014 Tepecik-Çiftlik Son Neolitik Dönem Mimarisi. Unpublished MA thesis, İstanbul University Social Sciences Institute.Google Scholar
Esin, Ufuk, Sevil, Gülçur and Emin Özel, M., 1999 Aksaray, Nevşehir, Niğde illeri 1997 ortak yüzey araştırması. 16. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 2:187201.Google Scholar
Godon, Martin 2005 New Results and Remarks about Neolithic Pottery in Central Anatolia: A View from Tepecik-Çiftlik. Colloquium Anatolicum 4:91103.Google Scholar
Godon, Martin 2010 De l’empreinte à l’outil, de la trace à la fonction: exemples d’outils de potiers dans le Néolithique Céramique centro-anatolien (7000–5500 BC cal). In Outils de potiers néolithiques: traditions techniques et organisation des productions céramiques, edited by Julien Vieugué and Yolaine Maigrot. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 107/4:691707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godon, Martin 2012 Cappadocia’s First Pottery Production, Tepecik-Çiftlik Neolithic Earliest Levels. 29. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 3:317339.Google Scholar
Gürel, Ali and Lermi, Abdurrahman 2010 Pleistocene-Holocene Fills of the Bor-Ereğli Plain (Central Anatolia): Recent Geo-archaeological Contributions. In Geo-Archaeological Activities in Southern Cappadocia, Turkey: Proceedings of the Meeting held at Pavia, 20.11.2008, edited by D’Alfonso, Lorenzo, Balza, Maria E. and Mora, Clelia, pp. 51155168. Italian University Press, Milan.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jane 1970 The Economy of Cities. Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
Karakaş, Gamze 2019 Tepecik-Çiftlik Höyüğü’nde Yumuşakça Kabukları. Unpublished MA thesis, İstanbul University Social Sciences Institute.Google Scholar
Lichter, Clemens 2005 Western Anatolia in the Late Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic: The Actual State of Research. In How Did Farming Reach Europe? Anatolian-European Relations from the Second Half of the 7th through the First Half of the 6th Millenium BC, edited by Lichter, Clemens, pp. 5974. Ege Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Özdemir, Kameray, Akyol, Ali Akın and Büyükkarakaya, Ali Metin 2017 Dietary Changes across the Neolithic Levels of the Tepecik-Çiftlik Population. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 16 (3), 594610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, Dixon, John E. and Cann, J. R. 1966 Obsidian and Early Cultural Contact in the Near East. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 32:3072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, Dixon, John E. and Cann, J. R. 1968 Further Analysis of Near Eastern Obsidians. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 34:319331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Řídký, Jaroslav 2009 Fragmentation and Secondary Use of the Manos and Metates from the Tepecik-Çiftlik Site in Central Turkey. In My Things Changed Things: Social Development and Cultural Exchange in Prehistory, Antiquity, and the Middle Ages, edited by Vlčková, Petra Maříková, Mynářová, Jana and Tomášek, Martin, pp. 140149. Charles University, Faculty of Arts, Prague.Google Scholar
Řídký, Jaroslav and Bıçakçı, Erhan 2008 A Part of Stone Artifacts from Tepecik-Çiftlik Site (Central Turkey). Orientalia Antiqua Nova 8:331340.Google Scholar
Řídký, Jaroslav and Bıçakçı, Erhan 2011 Kemenné artefakty odjinud. Živá Archeologie 12:2935.Google Scholar
Slimak, Ludovic, Kuhn, Steven, Roche, Hélène, et al. 2008 Kaletepe Deresi 3 (Turkey): Archaeological Evidence for Early Human Settlement in Central Anatolia. Journal of Human Evolution 54:99111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, Ian 1966 Preliminary Report on a Survey of Neolithic Sites in Central Anatolia. Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi 15/2:103107.Google Scholar
Todd, Ian 1973 The Neolithic Period in Central Anatolia. In Actes du 8ième Congrès International des Sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques, Beograd, 9–15 septembre 1971, Volume II, edited by Garašanin, Milutin, Benac, Alojz and Tasić, Nikola, pp. 214225. Union internationale des sciences préhistoriques et protohistoriques, Beograd.Google Scholar
Todd, Ian 1980 The Prehistory of Central Anatolia I: The Neolithic Period. Åström, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Van de Mieroop, Marc 1999 The Ancient Mesopotamian City. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Woldring, Henk 2002 Climate Change and the Onset of Sedentism in Cappadocia. In The Neolithic of Central Anatolia: Internal Developments and External Relations During the 9th – 6th millennia cal BC, Proceedings of the International CANeW Table Ronde, Istanbul, 23–24 November 2001, edited by Gérard, Frédéric and Thissen, Laurens, pp. 3966. Ege Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Woldring, Henk and Bottema, Sytze 2003 The Vegetation History of East-Central Anatolia in Relation to Archaeology: The Eski Acıgöl Pollen Evidence Compared with the Near Eastern Environment. Palaeohistoria 43–44:134.Google Scholar
Wright, Gary A. 1969 Obsidian Analyses and Prehistoric Near Eastern Trade 7500 to 3500 BC. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×